它是 NFL 的料，还是高中时的巅峰？三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Brand: Samsung

不做需要练习。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 比其他 Tab S 机型便宜得多。它没有 OLED 屏幕，在性能方面也有所缩水。在这里，您可以了解三星这款精简版平板电脑是否仍然物有所值。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/30/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ARM 5G Android Samsung Tablet

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 的评价

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 能给三星粉丝留下深刻印象吗？我们认为可以。以 499 美元到 649 美元的价格，三星提供了一款拥有高品质铝制机身、支持手写笔、配件齐全且更新时间很长的设备。

屏幕给人留下了深刻印象，色彩表现力良好，现在的连接包括 WiFi 6E，尽管这并没有带来非常明显的速度提升。此外，它还有一个 5G 版本，也可用作汽车的 GPS 设备。

此外，这款平板电脑还提供了不错的摄像头、比上一代产品更强大的存储空间以及几乎不明显的温度变化。扬声器也很棒，电池续航时间也相当长。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

就其本身而言，Galaxy Tab S10 FE 是一个不错的选择，但只要看一眼竞争对手的产品，就会很快发现不同的情况：即使是售价不到 400 美元的小米 Pad 7 Pro，其性能也明显要好得多。

我们从未想过Apple 会成为性价比方面的赢家，但 iPad Air 11 的价格只比Galaxy Tab S10 FE 稍高，性能却完全不同。它还配备了带蓝牙功能的手写笔，配置也要高出许多。

考虑到Galaxy Tab S10+ 和Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 极高的价格，Tab S10 FE 在三星的产品组合中似乎并不昂贵，但你必须忍受大幅削减成本的代价。如果你看看竞争对手的产品，会发现有明显更好的优惠。

得益于三星长期以来的更新承诺，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 也是一个强有力的竞争对手，而且其售价已经大大降低。

Pros

+ 现代、制作精良的铝制机身

+ 扬声器声音均衡

+ IP68 认证

+ 提供 WiFi 6E 和 5G

+ 色彩表现准确

+ 无 PWM

+ 承诺 7 年软件更新

+ 配件齐全

+ 附带一支笔

Cons

- 性能低于平均水平

- 充电速度慢

- 蓝牙编解码器数量有限

- 无光线追踪功能

- 缺乏可持续性信息

- 只有 USB 2.0，没有 NFC

- 玩游戏时卡顿

- 笔不支持蓝牙

价格和供应情况

我们的测试机由notebooksbilliger.de提供。

存储容量为 128 GB 的 5G 版本在亚马逊网站上的售价为 550 美元。存储容量为 256 GB 的 WiFi 版在亚马逊的售价为 570 美元。如果想节省 70 美元，也可以选择 128 GB 版本，目前的售价为 499 美元。

$552.54

SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 10.9”128 GB,Android Tablet,(AT&T Network),IP68 Water & Dust-Resistant,Long Battery Life,Powerful Processor,S Pen, 13MP Camera,Lightweight Design,US Version, 2025,Gray

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 的评价
规格
机箱 - 现代金属机箱，无多余装饰
功能 -Galaxy Tab S10 FE 仅支持 USB 2.0
软件 - 带有一系列预装应用程序的 OneUI
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 现配备 6 GHz WiFi
电话功能和语音质量 - 平板电脑可以拨打电话
相机 - 体面的平板电脑照片
配件和保修 - 提供键盘保护套
输入设备和操作 - 包括指纹传感器
显示屏 - Tab S10 FE 配备 IPS 显示屏，无 PWM
性能 - 应该不止于此
游戏 - 中端产品
排放 - 像黄瓜一样凉爽
电池寿命 - 充电器速度慢
Notebookcheck 总评分
Possible alternatives compared

现在，三星为智能手机、耳机和平板电脑等高端三星设备发行 "粉丝版"。这样做的目的也是为了让预算较少的人也能买到高品质的设备。

过去，这些设备所带来的妥协通常是可以接受的。唯一让粉丝们不太满意的是，三星经常使用自己的 Exynos SoC。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 是三星 Tab S10 系列中最经济实惠的平板电脑，旨在弥补中端和高端之间的差距。

有以下型号可供选择：

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 8 GB 内存/128 GB 存储：499 美元
三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE WiFi 12 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间：569 美元
三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 5G 8 GB 内存 / 128 GB 存储空间：552 美元

与三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE.在本次评测中，我们测试了一款欧洲 5G 机型，该机型也提供 256 GB 存储空间。

规格

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 1580 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 540

Memory

12 GB

Display

10.90 inch 16:10, 2304 x 1440 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 210 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 2 TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: compass, acceleration, hall, orientation

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n77/n78), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66), UMTS (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), LTE, 5G

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 254.3 x 165.8

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix video@ UHD 4K (3.840 x 2.160 Pixel), 30fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, pen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 certified, fanless, waterproof

Weight

497 g

Price

779 Euro

Amazon

$552.54

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机箱 - 现代金属机箱，无多余装饰

机身由一整块铝材碾压而成。平板电脑的外观非常简洁，几乎看不出材料的过渡。背面唯一的设计细节是左上角闪亮的三星徽标和色彩对比鲜明的印刷天线。总的来说，它的外观现代而不花哨。

三星提供深灰色或银色两种颜色的平板电脑。一种微妙的蓝色款式应该只在三星的在线商店有售，但其他在线零售商似乎也有出售。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 非常坚固，只有当你试图弯曲它时才会发出轻微的吱吱声。即使用力按压，液晶显示屏也几乎没有明显的变形。

它的重量约为 500 克，与同类平板电脑差不多，比上一代产品轻很多。此外，三星还将平板电脑的厚度降至 6 毫米，与 iPad Air 不相上下。

方便的是，这款平板电脑的防水防尘等级达到 IP68，因此可以在更恶劣的环境中使用。

尺寸比较

Honor Pad V9 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Apple iPad Air 11 2025 DIN A5 ❌

功能 -Galaxy Tab S10 FE 仅支持 USB 2.0

与三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra或 Tab S10+不同，Tab S10 FE 只有一个 USB 2.0 端口，无法通过电缆连接显示器。三星内部的桌面环境解决方案 DeX 即将停产。取而代之的是，你可以使用 Miracast 进行无线屏幕镜像或链接到 Windows。

底部边缘有一个带有三个 Pogo 引脚的基座端口，用于连接键盘盖。遗憾的是，Galaxy Tab S10 FE 没有配备 NFC 功能。

我们的 5G 机型支持 eSIM 卡，但也有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽，因此可以使用双卡。

microSD 读卡器

我们使用我们的参考 microSD 卡 Angelbird V60 对读卡器进行了测试。与前代产品一样，这款平板电脑与 microSD 卡之间的数据传输非常迅速，因此您可以根据需要使用它来存储文件。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	58.36 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580 (Angelbird V60)	57.4 MB/s
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years)	34.8 MB/s -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.8 (28.6-51.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø85.1 (61.1-113.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)

软件 - 带有一系列预装应用程序的 OneUI

这款平板电脑运行Android 15，还采用了三星自己的用户界面 OneUI 7。在测试时，安全补丁的日期是 2025 年 4 月，因此非常及时。三星承诺在 7 年内提供软件更新，最初每季度更新一次，之后每半年更新一次。

用户将不得不忍受多个预装第三方应用程序的存在。如果你想使用其他应用程序，三星自己的一些应用程序（如图库）也不是那么容易删除。

可持续性

平板电脑在生产和使用过程中会产生 124.9 千克二氧化碳当量。这对于平板电脑来说是相当高的。虽然三星声称从三星Galaxy S24 开始将废弃的渔网循环利用到设备的塑料部件中，但这无法具体到某一特定设备。关于测试设备所使用的材料以及回收材料的比例，目前还没有进一步的信息。

三星公司在其网站上提供了许多自行修理小问题的帮助。您还可以购买替换零件和下载某些设备的维修手册。在测试时，德国的Galaxy Tab S10 FE 还不能提供这种服务，但由于目前所有其他三星设备都已在列，我们认为应该很快就能提供。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 现配备 6 GHz WiFi

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 现在也支持 WiFi 6E，让用户可以使用较少使用的 6 GHz 频段。

我们在测试中使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器测得的速度与其他同类产品相比偏低，在 540 到 770 MBit/s 之间。这还不足以充分利用千兆互联网连接，但至少传输速度相当稳定。

我们的 5G 机型支持足够的 5G 和 4G 频率，通常可以让平板电脑在旅行时连接到移动网络。尽管如此，Galaxy Tab S10 FE 仍不能被视为一款完全全球化的设备。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	795 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	847 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼63%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1051 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1336 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼67%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	943 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1400 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1344 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	550 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	541 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1253 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼94%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø642 (539-697)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø746 (680-772)

在室外，经过短暂等待后，该设备对我们的定位精度可达 3 米。不过，与平板电脑通信的卫星数量相对较少。

在定位测试中，我们带着 Tab S10 FE 在城市中骑车。我们还带上了 Garmin Venu 2，这是一款具有相当精确位置跟踪功能的智能手表。

我们的测试设备表现良好，只是偶尔会将我们定位在距离道路一米远的地方。即使在狭窄的老城区街道上，定位也相对准确。

总的来说，如果你不需要在任何情况下都能精确定位，三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 可用于导航。

电话功能和语音质量 - 平板电脑可以拨打电话

平板电脑还可以用来打电话：通过扬声器和内置麦克风或通过连接的耳机。

通话质量很好，对方能听得很清楚。

相机 - 体面的平板电脑照片

在三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 等平板电脑上，摄像头的重要性不如智能手机。三星选择了一个 1300 万像素的传感器作为主摄像头，乍一看照片效果还不错。放大后会发现细节显得比较模糊和失焦。

在光线不足和对比度较高的条件下，动态范围会受到一定影响，尤其是在暗处。测试实验室显示，照片边缘的清晰度有细微下降，色彩略微过饱和。

主摄像头可拍摄 4K 视频，但只能以 30 帧/秒的速度拍摄。自动对焦偶尔会出现故障，但总体来说图像质量不错。

正面还有一个 1200 万像素的自拍摄像头。它拍摄的照片对比度略有降低，但清晰度尚可。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: 7.31 ∆E min: 2.64 - max: 14.89 ∆E

配件和保修 - 提供键盘保护套

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 配备的笔不支持蓝牙与设备连接。某些应用程序（包括笔记或绘图应用程序）经编程后可与笔配合使用。

该设备不附带充电器，但包括一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。

三星在线商店提供多种键盘盖。它们与 Galaxy Tab S9 FE.普通键盘盖售价 200 美元，还包括触摸板。有黑色和白色两种。超薄版只有黑色，售价 140 美元。它不包括触摸板。

如果你只想要一个保护平板电脑的书套，直接从三星购买需要 90 美元；更换一支笔需要 55 美元。

您可以在三星网站上购买各种护理和保修套餐。

输入设备和操作 - 包括指纹传感器

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 90-Hz 显示屏上的触摸屏能快速、准确地响应输入。不过，当手持平板电脑时，需要确保手掌不要直接放在显示屏上。设备并非总能正确识别不需要的输入。

指纹传感器集成在待机键中。它位于平板电脑长边的上方。一旦注册了指纹，就能非常可靠地识别，并直接从待机模式解锁屏幕。不过，在横向和纵向模式下使用时至少要注册两个手指，因为传感器的位置不同，可能不容易接触到。

另外，你也可以通过前置摄像头使用 2D 面部识别技术。由于它不像 iPad 那样使用深度传感器，因此Android 无法将其识别为银行等敏感应用程序的身份验证方法。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - Tab S10 FE 配备 IPS 显示屏，无 PWM

与同价位的大多数平板电脑一样，三星Galaxy S10 FE 没有采用 OLED 显示屏。IPS 屏幕的最大亮度为 667 cd/m²，适合日常使用。较低的黑色值也使得对比度很强。

分辨率为 2304 x 1440 像素，与前代产品相当。竞争对手如小米 Pad 7 Pro等竞争对手的分辨率更为细腻。

我们很高兴地注意到，该显示屏在较低亮度下不使用 PWM，因此适合敏感用户使用。


654 cd/m²	667 cd/m²	604 cd/m²
623 cd/m²	663 cd/m²	561 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	578 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 663 cd/m²
Contrast: 1700:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Honor Pad V9 IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5"	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen		-33%	-7%	-241%	-15%
Brightness middle	663	694 5%	508 -23%	543 -18%	776 17%
Brightness	617	695 13%	497 -19%	501 -19%	750 22%
Brightness Distribution	84	88 5%	93 11%	89 6%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.39	0.66 -69%	0.5 -28%	0.62 -59%	0.58 -49%
Contrast	1700	1052 -38%	1016 -40%	876 -48%	1338 -21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.47	2.1 -43%	1.13 23%	12.4 -744%	1.6 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.14	4.3 -4%	2.49 40%	15.9 -284%	4.5 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	3.3 -136%	1.7 -21%	12.1 -764%	2.5 -79%
Gamma	2.199 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.173 ^101%	0.58 ^379%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6730 ^97%	7010 ^93%	6747 ^96%	6175 ^105%	6892 ^94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8460 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

使用 CalMAN 软件在 "自然 "屏幕色彩模式下进行的分析表明，色彩还原非常准确，与目标色彩空间仅有微小偏差，肉眼几乎无法察觉。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.6 ms rise
47.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

最大亮度足以满足阴天的室外使用，但在晴天，你至少应该移到阴凉处。

由于采用了 IPS 技术，显示屏的可视角度非常广，效果非常出色。

性能 - 应该不止于此

我们以前说过：三星 Exynos SoC 并不是 "粉丝的最爱"，尤其是在价格较高的三星设备上。这是因为它们的性能往往低于高通（Qualcomm）或骁龙（Snapdragon）的同类 SoC，而且在过去不得不面对温度大幅上升的问题。

Galaxy Tab S10 FE 配备了三星 Exynos 1580.这款 SoC 也用于畅销的三星Galaxy A56 5G智能手机中也采用了这一 SoC，因此它承诺的是中档手机的性能，而不是奢华感。

事实上，价格更实惠的小米 Pad 7 Pro在性能方面要优越得多。Galaxy 平板电脑在测试的设备中只能处于中等水平。

不过，它的日常性能足以保证流畅运行，而且许多应用程序也能流畅运行。与功能更强大的平板电脑相比，要求更高的用户在使用该设备进行切割或处理大型图像文件时会发现明显的差异，处理过程略有延迟，偶尔还会出现卡顿现象。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	3019 Points +121%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1973 Points +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (1367 - 1380, n=2)	1374 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	1367 Points
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1359 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=86, last 2 years)	1204 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	1011 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	11773 Points +200%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	5127 Points +31%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4119 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	3921 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (3890 - 3921, n=2)	3906 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=86, last 2 years)	3872 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	2858 Points -27%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	2045290 Points +129%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1133809 Points +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (894364 - 901303, n=2)	897834 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	894364 Points
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=51, last 2 years)	888118 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	573936 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	17996 Points +35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	15743 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (13344 - 14298, n=2)	13821 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	13344 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	11259 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 25683, n=76, last 2 years)	10797 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1123 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	1052 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (1036 - 1052, n=2)	1044 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years)	825 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	673 Points -36%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	8895 Points +47%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	8279 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	6058 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	6058 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 11721, n=61, last 2 years)	4694 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	4424 Points -27%
System
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	11001 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10013 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	10013 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	9937 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	9016 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=61, last 2 years)	7750 Points -23%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	12938 Points +71%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	9693 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	7554 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	7554 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 12938, n=61, last 2 years)	5448 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	4486 Points -41%
Graphics
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	28497 Points +177%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	24738 Points +140%
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=61, last 2 years)	10976 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10293 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	10293 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	7031 Points -32%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1928 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	1730 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	1730 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1546 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	1347 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2056, n=61, last 2 years)	1339 Points -23%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	58543 Points +445%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	14738 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=60, last 2 years)	12142 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (10741 - 11181, n=2)	10961 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	10741 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	6110 Points -43%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet (268 - 499, n=2, last 2 years)	384 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	268 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	268 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet (270 - 497, n=2, last 2 years)	384 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	270 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	270 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Average of class Tablet (634 - 1133, n=2, last 2 years)	884 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	634 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	634 Points 0%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet (101 - 8305, n=6, last 2 years)	2251 Points
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1148 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	3686 Points +1129%
Average of class Tablet (99.7 - 7341, n=9, last 2 years)	1958 Points +553%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1070 Points +257%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288	300 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (n=1)	300 Points 0%

在图形性能方面，Tab S10 FE 的表现甚至更糟，它往往比其他制造商生产的所有同类设备都要慢，甚至比那些便宜得多的设备还要慢。

4K 的渲染性能太低，无法流畅显示，这也适用于屏幕原生分辨率下的复杂图形。在 1080p 分辨率下，性能通常足以流畅播放。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5611 Points +277%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3283 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3001 Points +102%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2594 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1488 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5190 Points +242%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3201 Points +111%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2649 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1519 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points -45%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12074 Points +133%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9759 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5184 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2987 Points -42%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	2088 Points +208%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1093 Points +61%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1075 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	677 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	2572 Points +270%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1137 Points +63%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1098 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	696 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps -8%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -33%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	592 fps +287%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	449 fps +193%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	375 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	153 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	120 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -15%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	450 fps +313%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	267 fps +145%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps -28%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +11%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	238 fps +194%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	183 fps +126%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps -35%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +88%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -34%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	159 fps +246%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +137%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +140%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	64.2 fps +192%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps +141%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +62%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	208 fps +292%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	145 fps +174%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -34%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	35.2 fps +263%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps +147%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6 fps -38%

在浏览互联网时，我们的测试设备在比较领域中名列前茅。网站加载速度很快，图片滚动时延迟很小。

YouTube 上的 4K 视频播放流畅。

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	303.591 Points +79%
Average of class Tablet (152 - 456, n=8, last 2 years)	268 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (169.9 - 173.1, n=2)	171.5 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	169.88 Points
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	151.997 Points -11%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	548 runs/min +182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	194 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (191 - 194, n=2)	192.5 runs/min -1%
Honor Pad V9	192 runs/min -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=65, last 2 years)	156.6 runs/min -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	80.1 runs/min -59%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	34.4 runs/min +180%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=42, last 2 years)	14 runs/min +14%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	12.3 runs/min 0%
Honor Pad V9	12.3 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	12.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (12 - 12.3, n=2)	12.2 runs/min -1%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	155 Points +12%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	148 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	138 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (138 - 138, n=2)	138 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)	119 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	107 Points -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	92645 Points +82%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	65712 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	50864 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (50719 - 50864, n=2)	50792 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	49086 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=94, last 2 years)	34919 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	34739 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=80, last 2 years)	3315 ms * -319%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	1208.7 ms * -53%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	847.4 ms * -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1580 (791 - 793, n=2)	792 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)	790.8 ms *
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	654.56 ms * +17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)	329.7 ms * +58%

* ... smaller is better

与上一代产品相比，三星对存储进行了升级，现在使用的是 UFS 3.1 存储，访问速度明显加快，等待时间也更短。不过，与Android 竞争对手相比，三星在存储速度方面并不领先。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	Honor Pad V9	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-53%	52%	101%	21%	-14%
Sequential Read 256KB	1602.8	526.65 -67%	1921.68 20%	3849.52 140%	1735 ?(950 - 2037, n=105) 8%	1255 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=77, last 2 years) -22%
Sequential Write 256KB	1271.5	282.47 -78%	1767.43 39%	3283.91 158%	1165 ?(452 - 2004, n=105) -8%	890 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=77, last 2 years) -30%
Random Read 4KB	225.1	225.02 0%	343.96 53%	302.34 34%	285 ?(173.5 - 543, n=105) 27%	206 ?(18.4 - 474, n=77, last 2 years) -8%
Random Write 4KB	204.2	68.78 -66%	396.64 94%	346.85 70%	318 ?(132.1 - 499, n=106) 56%	214 ?(8.23 - 668, n=77, last 2 years) 5%

游戏 - 中端产品

玩游戏时，你并不会真正感觉到自己是在使用高端设备。虽然我们在《源氏冲击》中使用高设置达到了 60 fps，但在战斗和快速移动过程中还是会出现明显的卡顿。

在《PUBG Mobile》中，即使使用最低设置，也只能达到 30 帧/秒，但相当稳定。我们使用GameBench 测试了帧率。.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø57 (38-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø57.5 (16-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.7 (27-31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.6 (26-31)

排放 - 像黄瓜一样凉爽

温度

我们说过 Exynos 芯片经常有过热问题吗？Galaxy Tab S10 FE 即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持低温：我们测得的最高表面温度为 40.3 °C。

正如 3DMark 压力测试所显示的那样，超频也不成问题。相反，它们还揭示了其他一些问题：图形单元不支持一些更现代的功能，如光线追踪，这意味着 3DMark Solar Bay 无法执行，尽管它在所有对比设备上都能运行（前代机除外）。

Max. Load

Idle


32 °C	29 °C	28 °C
40.3 °C	33 °C	28.1 °C
39.9 °C	32.7 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 32.4 °C


28.6 °C	28.8 °C	30.9 °C
29.3 °C	29.5 °C	31.5 °C
29.3 °C	30.8 °C	39 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.4 % -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % -10%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.7 % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.3 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.7 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.8 % -8%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84.7 % -13%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	76.4 % -22%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	95.7 %
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81.3 %
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	81.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.1 % -2%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 % -10%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	80 % -19%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.98 (8.89-9.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)

Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.3 (21.8-28.5)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.4 (13.9-16.4)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.8 (31.6-32)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.5 (49.2-56.2)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.6 (48.5-58.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø5.01 (4.99-5.03)

Apple iPad Air 11 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.4 (10.5-13.1)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.35 (7.17-8.06)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)

发言人

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 配备了两个扬声器。它们可以达到不错的音量，尽管其他平板电脑的音量更大。声音均衡、悦耳--即使音量很大，也不会失真，声音依然清晰。

不过，正如三星经常遇到的情况一样，蓝牙编解码器的缺乏令人讨厌。这意味着你在购买前需要检查你的耳机或扬声器是否能以高质量无线连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电器速度慢

能源消耗

三星似乎很好地控制了Galaxy Tab S10 FE 的能源需求。尽管如此，该机型的性能也明显低于其他一些平板电脑，因此必须考虑到这一点，尤其是在评估负载值时。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 25 瓦；平板电脑未随附充电器。

在我们的测试实验室中，即使使用具有适当功率输出的充电器，三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 也并非总能全速充电。看来充电器必须支持 USB Power Delivery 才能实现快速充电。即使这样，也需要近 3 个小时才能为设备充满电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	2.1 / 2.5 / 2.9 Watt
Load	5.8 / 7.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh	Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 1580	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-73%	-52%	-70%	1%	2%	-43%
Idle Minimum *	2.1	1.13 46%	1.6 24%	1.26 40%	0.75 64%	1.41 ?(0.72 - 2.1, n=2) 33%	1.766 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=72, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	2.5	4.81 -92%	2.8 -12%	5.57 -123%	1.5 40%	1.975 ?(1.45 - 2.5, n=2) 21%	3.76 ?(1 - 9.2, n=72, last 2 years) -50%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	4.89 -69%	4.7 -62%	5.61 -93%	1.56 46%	2.2 ?(1.49 - 2.9, n=2) 24%	4.25 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=72, last 2 years) -47%
Load Average *	5.8	15.02 -159%	11.4 -97%	12 -107%	7.92 -37%	7.74 ?(5.8 - 9.68, n=2) -33%	9.51 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=72, last 2 years) -64%
Load Maximum *	7.9	15.22 -93%	16.8 -113%	13.36 -69%	16.5 -109%	10.6 ?(7.9 - 13.4, n=2) -34%	13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=72, last 2 years) -68%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (2.02-11.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.27 (6.81-7.84)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.11 (2.03-2.46)

电池寿命

在我们的实际 WiFi 测试中，8000 毫安时电池可让平板电脑持续工作 14:47 小时。这应该能让你在沙发上度过一天，但如果你经常使用平板电脑，可能需要每晚充电。

在负载情况下，电池可持续使用约 4 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 06min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 8000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 mAh	Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-12%	21%	19%
Reader / Idle	1489		1534 3%
H.264	967		773 -20%
WiFi v1.3	887	872 -2%	703 -21%	1074 21%	1054 19%
Load	246		224 -9%

Notebookcheck 总评分

已评测：三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE。测试设备由 notebooksbilliger.de 提供

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 比其高端产品便宜很多，但在性能方面却走了不少弯路。

考虑到激烈的竞争，这一点尤其成问题，甚至Apple 在这一价格区间也推出了 iPad Air。 iPad Air.

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE - 04/28/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

67 / 80 → 84%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

46 / 69 → 67%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

90%

Display

83%

Games Performance

20 / 65 → 31%

Application Performance

62 / 92 → 68%

AI Performance

18%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

84 / 91 → 92%

Camera

54 / 90 → 60%

Average

70%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
80%

Materials
5%

Packaging
85%

Power Use
95%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 69.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 81.6%	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $552.54 List Price: 779€	497 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI IPS
2. 86.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ , 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $419.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S9 FE w/S... 2. $439.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (SM... 3. $469.79 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 11” ... List Price: 529€	524 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI TFT-LCD
3. 87.4%	Apple iPad Air 11 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: $499.00 List Price: 699€	460 g	128 GB NVMe	10.86" 2360x1640 265 PPI IPS
4. 82.2%	Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 3. $11.90 Case Compatible for Honor Pa... List Price: 500€	475 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI IPS
5. 86.5%	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $519.99 Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $309.50 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... 3. $113.55 Xiaomi Pad 7/7 Pro Keyboard ... List Price: 450€	500 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS

它是 NFL 的料，还是高中时的巅峰？三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 评测

不做需要练习。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 FE 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

机箱 - 现代金属机箱，无多余装饰

尺寸比较

功能 -Galaxy Tab S10 FE 仅支持 USB 2.0

microSD 读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - 带有一系列预装应用程序的 OneUI

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 现配备 6 GHz WiFi

电话功能和语音质量 - 平板电脑可以拨打电话

相机 - 体面的平板电脑照片

配件和保修 - 提供键盘保护套

输入设备和操作 - 包括指纹传感器

显示屏 - Tab S10 FE 配备 IPS 显示屏，无 PWM

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 应该不止于此

游戏 - 中端产品

排放 - 像黄瓜一样凉爽

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

发言人

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE audio analysis

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 - 充电器速度慢

能源消耗

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总评分

Possible alternatives compared

More articles related to this device

Transparency