三星 Galaxy Note 4 (SM-N910F) 智能手机简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 356 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 339 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.77 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.06 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
CCT: 6424 K
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Adreno 420, 805 APQ8084, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6 Plus PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB eMMC Flash | LG G3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Nokia Lumia 1520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | -66% | -12% | -113% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 335 | 519 55% | 417 24% | 421 26% | 702 110% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 339 | 496 46% | 395 17% | 399 18% | 671 98% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 90 -2% | 89 -3% | 86 -7% | 90 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.62 | 0.96 | 0.48 | 0.72 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.77 | 3.67 -107% | 5.67 -220% | 3.28 -85% | 8.92 -404% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.06 | 3.78 -83% | 5.66 -175% | 2.28 -11% | 9.59 -366% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.53 87% | 2.5 88% | 2.75 80% |
| CCT | 6424 101% | 7327 89% | 7741 84% | 6936 94% | 9408 69% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 99 | 59 -40% | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 837 | 434 | 877 | 975 |
* ... smaller is better
GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | 3DMark | Linpack Android / IOS | AnTuTu v4 | AnTuTu v5 | Basemark X 1.1 | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| LG Optimus G Pro Lite Dual D686 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| LG Optimus G Pro Lite Dual D686 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| LG Optimus G Pro Lite Dual D686 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| AnTuTu v4 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| LG Optimus G Pro Lite Dual D686 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 3 SM-N9005 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| LG Optimus G Pro Lite Dual D686 | |
| Sony Xperia Z3 | |
| HTC One M8 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
* ... smaller is better
| BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 ME560CG (K00G) | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W | |
| LG G3 | |
| Nokia Lumia 1520 | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  0.6 / 1.1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Load |
4.3 / 9.4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Adreno 420, 805 APQ8084, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6 Plus PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Nokia Lumia 1520 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z3 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -13% | -13% | -46% | -25% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 27.8 | 23.9 -14% | 24.3 -13% | 14.2 -49% | 20.1 -28% |
| H.264 (h) | 11.7 | 11.3 -3% | 14.6 25% | 4.6 -61% | 11.4 -3% |
| WiFi (h) | 12.4 | 13 5% | 9.7 -22% | 7.5 -40% | 11.2 -10% |
| Load (h) | 5.4 | 3.3 -39% | 3.2 -41% | 3.5 -35% | 2.2 -59% |
三星Galaxy Note 4 (SM-N910F)是一款出色的智能手机。它的材质现在看上去更加美观，且金属边框也让机身整体的设计感更进一步。它的Snapdragon 805处理器速度非常快，但Adreno 420显卡在负载下的降频问题十分烦人。我们十分好奇采用三星的64位处理器Exynos 5433和ARM Mali-T760显卡的SM-N910C机型是否也有同样的问题。
Note 4的QHD分辨率Super AMOLED屏幕可能是现在智能手机中最好的一块屏幕了。它的色域覆盖很广，色彩还原也很准确，同时非常适合户外使用，让人简直无可挑剔。这款旗舰机还配备了手写笔和非常优秀的通信模组，最高支持LTE Cat. 6制式。它的快速充电给我们带来了很大的惊喜而它的电池续航时间也非常优秀。
很遗憾的是它没有采用USB 3.0接口，而是更慢的版本。我们也希望Galaxy Note可以有一直开启的语音控制功能，这项技术在Moto X中已经得到了应用。另外，我们也希望它可以有三防的功能。尽管降频问题有些烦人，但由于大量优秀的功能和S-Pen手写笔，我们仍然给了它一些加分。
如果你在寻找一款在各方面都非常出色的高端智能手机，且愿意承担相应的售价的话，那么三星Galaxy Note 4可能会让你十分满意。如果你需要一款更加实惠的手机的话，它的前代产品同样是一个不错的选择，现在售价约450欧元（约3400人民币）。售价更低的还有缩水版的Note 3 Neo（起价318欧元，约2402人民币）。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
