三星Galaxy Note10+智能手机评测：优化后的SoC保证更好的续航

Name: Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Brand: Samsung

S-Pen和令人惊叹的屏幕素质再次将Galaxy Note与Galaxy S区分开来。今年的Galaxy Note上首次有了比Galaxy S更新的SoC，来看看Exynos 9825相比较Exynos 9820带来了哪些改进。在许多方面，Note 10+都是重新设计的，有些许略微调整和遗漏。继续阅读以了解Note 10+在本次评测中的表现。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 11/17/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy Note Smartphone Phablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Note10 Plus (Galaxy Note Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9825 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.80 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 495 PPI, 电容屏, 10点触控, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, 2.5D Curved, glossy: yes, HDR

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 224.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 最多1 TB microSD卡。支持FAT，FAT 32和exFAT的文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，气压计，陀螺仪传感器，地磁传感器，霍尔，接近度, RGB, MST, Ant+, USB OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, GPRS, Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B34, B39. LTE Cat. 20: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66. TDD: Bands 38, 39, 40 and 41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.3 x 77.2

Battery

16.56 Wh, 4300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3,85 V

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.5/2.4, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 μm) + 12MPix (Telephoto, 2x zoom, f/2.1, 52m m, 1/3.6", 1.0 μm) + 16MPix (f/2.2, 12 mm, 1.0 μm)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 混合立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB Type-C电缆，S-Pen，SIM工具，S-Pen使用指南，USB Type-C耳机，适配器, One UI 1.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证。SAR值：身体– 1.404 W / kg，头部– 0.187 W / kg。, fanless, waterproof

Weight

196 g

Price

7999 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (564^min - 663^max) MBit/s +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	558 (496^min - 582^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	534 (468^min - 587^max) MBit/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	548 (399^min - 599^max) MBit/s -2%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	502 (465^min - 517^max) MBit/s -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	670 (326^min - 802^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	349 (310^min - 384^max) MBit/s -48%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s -7%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	578 (474^min - 617^max) MBit/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	567 (371^min - 667^max) MBit/s -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	566 (514^min - 586^max) MBit/s -16%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s -30%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -44%

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3 / AX12: Ø669 (326-802)

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (310-384)

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø558 (496-582)

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3 / AX12: Ø534 (468-587)

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Overview

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Loop

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10+

Google Pixel 3a XL

Huawei P30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10+

Google Pixel 3a XL

Huawei P30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10+

Google Pixel 3a XL

Huawei P30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10+: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 18.94 ∆E


709 cd/m²	694 cd/m²	706 cd/m²
694 cd/m²	683 cd/m²	696 cd/m²
692 cd/m²	679 cd/m²	692 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 709 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 693.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.61 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 683 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11

	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.80	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.70	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50	Huawei Mate 20 X OLED, 2244x1080, 7.20	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67	LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.20
Screen		-19%	15%	12%	16%	-21%
Brightness middle	683	735 8%	656 -4%	421 -38%	586 -14%	539 -21%
Brightness	694	735 6%	659 -5%	418 -40%	584 -16%	556 -20%
Brightness Distribution	96	94 -2%	88 -8%	96 0%	97 1%	88 -8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.9	3.9 -34%	1.7 41%	1.1 62%	1.39 52%	3.78 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.8	10.9 -127%	2.8 42%	2.2 54%	2.7 44%	6.95 -45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.4 36%	1.7 23%	1.4 36%	1.6 27%	2.2 -0%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.09 ^105%	1.998 ^110%	2.23 ^99%	2.243 ^98%	2.274 ^97%
CCT	6247 ^104%	6549 ^99%	6487 ^100%	6723 ^97%	6672 ^97%	6013 ^108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4549 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3234 Points -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points -24%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3406 Points -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4549 - 4551, n=2)	4550 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	10367 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10489 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9852 Points -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10274 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (10367 - 10484, n=2)	10426 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +35%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	11300 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10192 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5759 Points -49%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points -34%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7442 Points -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (10515 - 11300, n=2)	10908 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points -4%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	11813 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9557 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9867 Points -16%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11890 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (11011 - 11813, n=2)	11412 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +28%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	9027 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7704 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7772 Points -14%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points +10%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9125 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (8801 - 9027, n=2)	8914 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +20%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	54233 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	54087 Points 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +43%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	34035 Points -37%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points +19%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65945 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (53140 - 54233, n=2)	53687 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	66142 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	66990 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +142%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42579 Points -36%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points +62%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97354 Points +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (65614 - 66142, n=2)	65878 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	33268 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32308 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19993 Points -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points -19%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30972 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (31908 - 33268, n=2)	32588 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4502 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points +16%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2567 Points -43%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points +67%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5251 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4502 - 5096, n=2)	4799 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5043 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6058 Points +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2347 Points -53%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points +95%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6122 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (5043 - 5732, n=2)	5388 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3273 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3448 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3816 Points +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points +25%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3505 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (3273 - 3670, n=2)	3472 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4618 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4766 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points +44%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2525 Points -45%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points +72%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5268 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4618 - 5048, n=2)	4833 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5083 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5307 Points +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points +104%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2536 Points -50%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points +105%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6358 Points +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (5083 - 5605, n=2)	5344 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3498 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3513 Points 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2488 Points -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points +24%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3293 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (3498 - 3746, n=2)	3622 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4940 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4579 Points -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -28%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3575 Points -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points +13%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5068 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4940 - 5003, n=2)	4972 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)	2767 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5712 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5152 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3528 Points -38%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points +9%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6040 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (5659 - 5712, n=2)	5686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)	2765 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3353 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3296 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3751 Points +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points +21%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3242 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (3353 - 3559, n=2)	3456 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)	3168 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	5143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4821 Points -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3599 Points -30%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points +22%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4604 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (5143 - 5300, n=2)	5222 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=181, last 2 years)	6766 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	6036 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5418 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4103 Points -32%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points +18%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5184 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (6036 - 6087, n=2)	6062 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=180, last 2 years)	9771 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	3389 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3480 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2517 Points -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points +31%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3309 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (3389 - 3649, n=2)	3519 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=180, last 2 years)	4232 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4713 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4515 Points -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points +5%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3800 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4713 - 4921, n=2)	4817 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)	2684 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	6186 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5565 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points -6%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4236 Points -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (6186 - 6342, n=2)	6264 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)	2866 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	2571 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2720 Points +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points +29%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2794 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (2571 - 2758, n=2)	2665 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)	2678 Points +4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	58 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	59 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +3%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps +3%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (55 - 58, n=2)	56.5 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	95 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	97 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +138%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	119 fps +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps +75%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (50 - 95, n=2)	72.5 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +160%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	56 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +5%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps -2%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (56 - 57, n=2)	56.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +29%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	89 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +20%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	78 fps -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps +13%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	50 fps -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (69 - 89, n=2)	79 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +58%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +64%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	50 fps +39%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (36 - 45, n=2)	40.5 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +69%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	65 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps +7%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	53 fps -18%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps +9%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35 fps -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (47 - 65, n=2)	56 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +52%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +72%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps +17%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	21 fps +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (18 - 21, n=2)	19.5 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +141%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps +54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps +43%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps +50%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (21 - 28, n=2)	24.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +114%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	27 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +74%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps +7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps -15%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (27 - 35, n=2)	31 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)	44.2 fps +64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	48 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps -23%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	30 fps -37%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps -12%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (38 - 48, n=2)	43 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +34%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +89%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	20 fps +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps -12%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	14 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (17 - 29, n=2)	23 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +94%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps -9%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps -11%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8.5 fps -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (18 - 18, n=2)	18 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +43%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	39.13 (10.62^min - 99.35^max) fps
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36.29 fps -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (39.1 - 39.7, n=2)	39.4 fps +1%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	27.47 (12.07^min - 47.94^max) fps
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	22.73 fps -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (27.5 - 37.3, n=2)	32.4 fps +18%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	33.38 (8.52^min - 83.34^max) fps
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	37.3 fps +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (33.4 - 33.7, n=2)	33.6 fps +1%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	347229 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	327454 Points -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	273409 Points -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points +6%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	321145 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (347082 - 347229, n=2)	347156 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4985 Score
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Score 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4985 - 4996, n=2)	4991 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +20%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4637 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4226 Points -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4104 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points +7%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4389 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4637 - 4889, n=2)	4763 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +24%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	7965 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7793 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +47%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7923 Points -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points +15%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8718 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (7965 - 8014, n=2)	7990 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	4646 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4502 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -61%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5700 Points +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points +13%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4324 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (4598 - 4646, n=2)	4622 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	9092 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8981 Points -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +72%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5070 Points -44%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8414 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (9092 - 9465, n=2)	9279 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +55%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288	1374 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1012 Points -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +26%
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1239 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points -1%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1171 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (1374 - 1638, n=2)	1506 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +9%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1425 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 ()	1976 Points
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)	2240 Points

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +149%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points +46%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	53.8 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (42.7 - 48, n=2)	45.3 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)	44.35 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)	42.69 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)	64.1 runs/min
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 ()	59.7 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	57 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	118 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	115 Points -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (97 - 118, n=2)	107.5 Points -9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	107 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	86 Points -27%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +125%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years)	33588 Points +76%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points +29%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	23830 Points +25%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	21208 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	20653 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	19135 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (18908 - 19135, n=2)	19022 Points -1%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)	2528 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (2478 - 2528, n=2)	2503 ms * +1%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	2145 ms * +15%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	2036 ms * +19%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms * +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	1823 ms * +28%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +37%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +76%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Note10+	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	Huawei Mate 20 X	OnePlus 7 Pro	LG G8s ThinQ	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-56%	-11%	-33%	-43%	2%	41%
Sequential Read 256KB	1504	816 -46%	912 -39%	1468 -2%	791 -47%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) 3%	1502 ?(226 - 4512, n=216, last 2 years) 0%
Sequential Write 256KB	588	246.3 -58%	182.7 -69%	387 -34%	182.4 -69%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) -2%	1111 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=216, last 2 years) 89%
Random Read 4KB	196.2	135 -31%	144.4 -26%	174.1 -11%	138 -30%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) 7%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=216, last 2 years) 26%
Random Write 4KB	183.6	23.79 -87%	237.6 29%	24.8 -86%	29.6 -84%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) 3%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=216, last 2 years) 48%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		83.1 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 17%		67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	70.6 ?(34.7 - 82.5, n=5) -1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		72 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 21%		46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -22%	59.8 ?(30.7 - 71.7, n=5) 1%

PUBG Mobile HD

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; 0.14.0: Ø39.9 (37-42)

Asphalt 9 (High Details)

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy Note10+; 4.5.22485: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Max. Load

Idle


32.6 °C	32.8 °C	31.3 °C
34.2 °C	34.1 °C	31.6 °C
33 °C	33.9 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 32.8 °C


30.7 °C	33.7 °C	31.9 °C
31.1 °C	35.5 °C	35.9 °C
31.2 °C	35.4 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 1.81 / 1.92 Watt
Load	7.57 / 9.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9825	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		5%	12%	4%	-8%	-7%	-1%	9%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.66 6%	1 -43%	0.79 -13%	0.9 -29%	1.2 -71%	0.8 ?(0.7 - 0.9, n=2) -14%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.81	1.82 -1%	1.4 23%	1.72 5%	1.8 1%	1.6 12%	1.505 ?(1.2 - 1.81, n=2) 17%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	1.92	1.83 5%	1.7 11%	1.83 5%	2.9 -51%	2 -4%	1.96 ?(1.92 - 2, n=2) -2%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	7.57	6.11 19%	4.6 39%	5.53 27%	5.5 27%	5 34%	7.64 ?(7.57 - 7.7, n=2) -1%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 27%
Load Maximum *	9.34	9.81 -5%	6.7 28%	9.85 -5%	8.2 12%	10 -7%	9.92 ?(9.34 - 10.5, n=2) -6%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		26h 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 9.2)		8h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 05min

	Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh
Battery Runtime		17%	-5%	19%	4%	-4%
Reader / Idle	1585	2340 48%	1305 -18%	1984 25%	1745 10%	1689 7%
H.264	934	1047 12%	801 -14%	986 6%	802 -14%	753 -19%
WiFi v1.3	532	533 0%	742 39%	786 48%	768 44%	693 30%
Load	305	327 7%	223 -27%	300 -2%	236 -23%	203 -33%

Pros

+ 高屏占比

+ 令人印象深刻的OLED面板

+ HDR10 +

+ 有用的S-Pen

+ 强大的相机

+ 好的指纹传感器

+ 可扩展存储

+ 强大SoC

+ UFS 3.0闪存

+ 可选的5G型号

+ 出色的游戏性能

Cons

- 相对较慢的Wi-Fi

- 电池续航时间不足

- 没有3.5毫米耳机插孔

- 没有心率传感器

- 缺乏aptX HD支持

The Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (SM-N975F) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

三星Galaxy Note 10+是一台极具吸引力的手机，但这一切是有代价的，特别是它的价格明显高于其前代产品。超声波指纹传感器和摄像头是相对Note 9的改进，但新的S-Pen手势的实用性值得怀疑。此外，虽然S-Pen很不错，但我们怀疑很少有人会在日常使用中从中获得任何加成。此外，我们无法理解为什么三星选择在其最昂贵的旗舰产品中省略1 TB选项和3D人脸识别功能。

大，强，美-三星Galaxy Note 10+是一款出色的智能手机，但没有提供比上一代Galaxy Note或者Galaxy S10更多的功能。

尽管如此，Note 10+是一款功能齐全的智能手机，除了耳机插孔之外，它包括了所有东西。三星对于支持某些蓝牙编解码器的固执己见也仍然困扰着我们。

尽管Exynos 9825的效率比其前任产品更高，但其优势只有在持续负载下才能体现出来。与我们测试过的先前旗舰三星智能手机一样，Note 10+的电池续航也很短。

总体而言，这是一款出色的旗舰产品，也是你可以买到的最好的智能手机之一。

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 91%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

67 / 70 → 96%

Weight

88%

Battery

87%

Display

91%

Games Performance

47 / 64 → 74%

Application Performance

77 / 86 → 90%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

80%

Average

82%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Note10+智能手机评测：优化后的SoC保证更好的续航

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-11-17 (Update: 2019-11-17)

三星Galaxy Note10+智能手机评测：优化后的SoC保证更好的续航

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile HD

Asphalt 9 (High Details)

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ audio analysis

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare