Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy Note10+智能手机评测:优化后的SoC保证更好的续航

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 11/17/2019
Android ARM Galaxy Note Smartphone Phablet Touchscreen

S-Pen和令人惊叹的屏幕素质再次将Galaxy Note与Galaxy S区分开来。今年的Galaxy Note上首次有了比Galaxy S更新的SoC,来看看Exynos 9825相比较Exynos 9820带来了哪些改进。在许多方面,Note 10+都是重新设计的,有些许略微调整和遗漏。继续阅读以了解Note 10+在本次评测中的表现。

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Galaxy Note Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9825
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Memory
12288 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.8 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 495 PPI, 电容屏, 10点触控, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, 2.5D Curved, glossy: yes, HDR
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, , 224.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 最多1 TB microSD卡。 支持FAT,FAT 32和exFAT的文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,气压计,陀螺仪传感器,地磁传感器,霍尔,接近度, RGB, MST, Ant+, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, GPRS, Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B34, B39. LTE Cat. 20: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66. TDD: Bands 38, 39, 40 and 41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.3 x 77.2
Battery
16.56 Wh, 4300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3,85 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.5/2.4, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 μm) + 12MPix (Telephoto, 2x zoom, f/2.1, 52m m, 1/3.6", 1.0 μm) + 16MPix (f/2.2, 12 mm, 1.0 μm)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 混合立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB Type-C电缆,S-Pen,SIM工具,S-Pen使用指南,USB Type-C耳机,适配器, One UI 1.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证。SAR值:身体– 1.404 W / kg,头部– 0.187 W / kg。, fanless, waterproof
Weight
196 g
Price
7999元 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

174.6 mm 85.4 mm 8.2 mm 232 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.6 mm 77.1 mm 7.9 mm 198 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼100% +79%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼93% +66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼91% +62%
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
566 (min: 514, max: 586) MBit/s ∼91% +62%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼75% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (min: 310, max: 384) MBit/s ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=463)
230 MBit/s ∼37% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 564, max: 663) MBit/s ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼95% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (min: 496, max: 582) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼87% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼79% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=463)
218 MBit/s ∼34% -61%
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
29.1 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
57.2 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
57.9 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10+: 41.84 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 65.15 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
16.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10+: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 18.94 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart in the dark
709
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 709 cd/m² Average: 693.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.61 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 683 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei Mate 20 X
OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-19%
15%
12%
16%
-21%
Brightness middle
683
735
8%
656
-4%
421
-38%
586
-14%
539
-21%
Brightness
694
735
6%
659
-5%
418
-40%
584
-16%
556
-20%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
88
-8%
96
0%
97
1%
88
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.9
3.9
-34%
1.7
41%
1.1
62%
1.39
52%
3.78
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.8
10.9
-127%
2.8
42%
2.2
54%
2.7
44%
6.95
-45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
1.4
36%
1.7
23%
1.4
36%
1.6
27%
2.2
-0%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.09 105%
1.998 110%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
2.274 97%
CCT
6247 104%
6549 99%
6487 100%
6723 97%
6672 97%
6013 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11300 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10192 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5759 Points ∼51% -49%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼66% -34%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (10515 - 11300, n=2)
10908 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10489 Points ∼93% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9852 Points ∼88% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼96% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (10367 - 10484, n=2)
10426 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼42% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼95% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3234 Points ∼68% -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼73% -24%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼71% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4549 - 4551, n=2)
4550 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼30% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7704 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7772 Points ∼78% -14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +10%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼91% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (8801 - 9027, n=2)
8914 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=399)
5379 Points ∼54% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9557 Points ∼80% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9867 Points ∼83% -16%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼99% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (11011 - 11813, n=2)
11412 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=566)
5844 Points ∼49% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2720 Points ∼82% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100% +29%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (2571 - 2758, n=2)
2665 Points ∼80% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=76)
2691 Points ∼81% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5565 Points ∼89% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼92% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (6186 - 6342, n=2)
6264 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=76)
2807 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4515 Points ∼91% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100% +5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4713 - 4921, n=2)
4817 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=76)
2550 Points ∼51% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3480 Points ∼79% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼61% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2517 Points ∼57% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100% +31%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (3389 - 3649, n=2)
3519 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=406)
2002 Points ∼45% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5418 Points ∼76% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4103 Points ∼58% -32%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100% +18%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (6036 - 6087, n=2)
6062 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=406)
1824 Points ∼26% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4821 Points ∼77% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼66% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3599 Points ∼57% -30%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100% +22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼73% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (5143 - 5300, n=2)
5222 Points ∼83% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=407)
1693 Points ∼27% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3513 Points ∼81% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼68% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2488 Points ∼57% -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100% +24%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (3498 - 3746, n=2)
3622 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=435)
1910 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5307 Points ∼51% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2536 Points ∼24% -50%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100% +105%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼61% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (5083 - 5605, n=2)
5344 Points ∼51% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=435)
2432 Points ∼23% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4766 Points ∼60% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼84% +44%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2525 Points ∼32% -45%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100% +72%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼66% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4618 - 5048, n=2)
4833 Points ∼61% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=435)
2040 Points ∼26% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3296 Points ∼81% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼75% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3751 Points ∼92% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼100% +21%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼80% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (3353 - 3559, n=2)
3456 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=486)
1907 Points ∼47% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5152 Points ∼82% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼60% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3528 Points ∼56% -38%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼100% +9%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼97% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (5659 - 5712, n=2)
5686 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=486)
1510 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4579 Points ∼82% -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼64% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3575 Points ∼64% -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼100% +13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4940 - 5003, n=2)
4972 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=487)
1453 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3448 Points ∼84% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼66% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3816 Points ∼93% +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100% +25%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼86% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (3273 - 3670, n=2)
3472 Points ∼85% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=527)
1770 Points ∼43% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6058 Points ∼62% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼72% +40%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼24% -53%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼100% +95%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼62% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (5043 - 5732, n=2)
5388 Points ∼55% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=526)
1982 Points ∼20% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼69% +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼69% +16%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2567 Points ∼34% -43%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100% +67%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼70% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4502 - 5096, n=2)
4799 Points ∼64% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=529)
1708 Points ∼23% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32308 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19993 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼81% -19%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (31908 - 33268, n=2)
32588 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=687)
14357 Points ∼43% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
66990 Points ∼42% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +142%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42579 Points ∼27% -36%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼67% +62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼61% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (65614 - 66142, n=2)
65878 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=685)
22559 Points ∼14% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
54087 Points ∼70% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +43%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
34035 Points ∼44% -37%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼83% +19%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼85% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (53140 - 54233, n=2)
53687 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=685)
18200 Points ∼23% -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
97 fps ∼43% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +138%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
119 fps ∼53% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼73% +75%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼38% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (50 - 95, n=2)
72.5 fps ∼32% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=705)
38.5 fps ∼17% -59%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼97% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (55 - 58, n=2)
56.5 fps ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=714)
28.3 fps ∼47% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼79% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +20%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
78 fps ∼73% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼94% +13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼47% -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (69 - 89, n=2)
79 fps ∼74% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=610)
22.3 fps ∼21% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90% -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼93% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼86% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (56 - 57, n=2)
56.5 fps ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=619)
19.6 fps ∼33% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼98% +7%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
53 fps ∼75% -18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100% +9%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼49% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (47 - 65, n=2)
56 fps ∼79% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=475)
18.2 fps ∼26% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +64%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼85% +39%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼61% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (36 - 45, n=2)
40.5 fps ∼69% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=477)
17 fps ∼29% -53%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +89%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼62% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼47% -12%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼44% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (17 - 29, n=2)
23 fps ∼72% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=198)
10.2 fps ∼32% -40%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼89% -11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼47% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (18 - 18, n=2)
18 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=197)
7.08 fps ∼39% -61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +74%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼62% +7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼49% -15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼47% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (27 - 35, n=2)
31 fps ∼66% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=202)
15 fps ∼32% -44%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼63% -37%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼88% -12%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼46% -54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (38 - 48, n=2)
43 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=202)
16.8 fps ∼35% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% +43%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼65% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98% +50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (21 - 28, n=2)
24.5 fps ∼57% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=400)
12.4 fps ∼29% -56%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼74% +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼100% +72%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼90% +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼68% +17%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼68% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (18 - 21, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼63% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=404)
11.1 fps ∼36% -38%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (min: 8.52, max: 83.34) fps ∼39%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼44% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (33.4 - 33.7, n=2)
33.6 fps ∼39% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=66)
85.4 fps ∼100% +156%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (min: 12.07, max: 47.94) fps ∼44%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼36% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (27.5 - 37.3, n=2)
32.4 fps ∼52% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=59)
62.8 fps ∼100% +129%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (min: 10.62, max: 99.35) fps ∼40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼37% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (39.1 - 39.7, n=2)
39.4 fps ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=56)
97.3 fps ∼100% +149%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
347229 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
327454 Points ∼89% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼82% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
273409 Points ∼74% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼100% +6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼87% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (347082 - 347229, n=2)
347156 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143005 Points ∼39% -59%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼100%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4985 - 4996, n=2)
4991 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=63)
2271 Score ∼46% -54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1012 Points ∼58% -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1239 Points ∼72% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼79% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼68% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (1374 - 1638, n=2)
1506 Points ∼87% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=643)
765 Points ∼44% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8981 Points ∼57% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5070 Points ∼32% -44%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼60% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼54% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (9092 - 9465, n=2)
9279 Points ∼59% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=643)
2116 Points ∼14% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4502 Points ∼79% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼32% -61%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5700 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼92% +13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼76% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4598 - 4646, n=2)
4622 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=643)
1558 Points ∼27% -66%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7793 Points ∼67% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7923 Points ∼68% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼78% +15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼75% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (7965 - 8014, n=2)
7990 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=643)
3039 Points ∼26% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4226 Points ∼85% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼98% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4104 Points ∼82% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼100% +7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
  (4637 - 4889, n=2)
4763 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=643)
1526 Points ∼31% -67%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1425 Points ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
 
1976 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=106)
746 Points ∼31%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100% +46%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼86% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (42.7 - 48, n=2)
45.3 Points ∼72% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)
44.352 Points ∼71% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115)
36.4 Points ∼58% -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼100%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
59.7 runs/min ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
57 runs/min ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=103)
40.2 runs/min ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
115 Points ∼74% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼72% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (97 - 118, n=2)
108 Points ∼70% -8%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼69% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
86 Points ∼55% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=173)
67.4 Points ∼43% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +125%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼57% +29%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼55% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
21208 Points ∼49% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
20653 Points ∼48% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼44%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (18908 - 19135, n=2)
19022 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=702)
6930 Points ∼16% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=726)
10451 ms * ∼100% -313%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9825 (2478 - 2528, n=2)
2503 ms * ∼24% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
2145.4 ms * ∼21% +15%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% +19%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
1823.2 ms * ∼17% +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +76%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note10+Samsung Galaxy S10 5GHuawei Mate 20 XOnePlus 7 ProLG G8s ThinQAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-56%
-11%
-33%
-43%
-9%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
21%
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-21%
64.3 (59.5 - 69.2, n=2)
8%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=438)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.14 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
17%
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
76.7 (71 - 82.5, n=2)
8%
67.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=438)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
183.59
23.79
-87%
237.63
29%
24.8
-86%
29.6
-84%
106 (24.8 - 259, n=7)
-42%
23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
196.22
134.96
-31%
144.44
-26%
174.1
-11%
138
-30%
186 (169 - 226, n=7)
-5%
48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
588.06
246.3
-58%
182.7
-69%
387
-34%
182.4
-69%
453 (387 - 590, n=7)
-23%
99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1503.7
815.56
-46%
911.88
-39%
1468
-2%
791.1
-47%
1525 (1463 - 1781, n=7)
1%
280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762)
-81%
PUBG Mobile HD
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.14.0: Ø39.9 (37-42)
Asphalt 9 (High Details)
010203040Tooltip
; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)
Battle Bay
0102030405060Tooltip
; 4.5.22485: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Max. Load
 32.6 °C32.8 °C31.3 °C 
 34.2 °C34.1 °C31.6 °C 
 33 °C33.9 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
30.7 °C33.7 °C31.9 °C
31.1 °C35.5 °C35.9 °C
31.2 °C35.4 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.62536.436.3312730.34029.328.55038.241.26328.831.58027.527.11002326.312521.234.216018.748.220019.652.325017.955.731517.756.840015.461.250016.663.763015.164.380015.969.5100013.971.9125014.474.6160014.974.3200014.575.1250014.876.5315014.375.8400014.376.2500014.674.1630014.872.5800015.370.91000014.867.9125001559.81600015.156.6SPL27.185.7N0.963.1median 15.1median 67.9Delta1.49.531.137.329.230.42622.323.221.531.931.327.421.72921.624.224.818.4341851.817.450.714.456.115.859.716.360.815.461.114.763.516.265.514.77313.871.61474.314.473.914.176.414.674.114.672.714.470.514.469.214.863.715.259.214.758.614.849.726.984.10.955.6median 14.7median 63.51.49.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note10+Huawei Mate 20 X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.81 / 1.92 Watt
Load midlight 7.57 / 9.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9825
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
12%
4%
-8%
-7%
-1%
11%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.66
6%
1
-43%
0.79
-13%
0.9
-29%
1.2
-71%
0.8 (0.7 - 0.9, n=2)
-14%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=792)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.81
1.82
-1%
1.4
23%
1.72
5%
1.8
1%
1.6
12%
1.505 (1.2 - 1.81, n=2)
17%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=791)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.92
1.83
5%
1.7
11%
1.83
5%
2.9
-51%
2
-4%
1.96 (1.92 - 2, n=2)
-2%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=792)
-6%
Load Average *
7.57
6.11
19%
4.6
39%
5.53
27%
5.5
27%
5
34%
7.64 (7.57 - 7.7, n=2)
-1%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=786)
46%
Load Maximum *
9.34
9.81
-5%
6.7
28%
9.85
-5%
8.2
12%
10
-7%
9.92 (9.34 - 10.5, n=2)
-6%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=786)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 05min
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Battery Runtime
17%
-5%
19%
4%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1585
2340
48%
1305
-18%
1984
25%
1745
10%
1689
7%
H.264
934
1047
12%
801
-14%
986
6%
802
-14%
753
-19%
WiFi v1.3
532
533
0%
742
39%
786
48%
768
44%
693
30%
Load
305
327
7%
223
-27%
300
-2%
236
-23%
203
-33%

Pros

+ 高屏占比
+ 令人印象深刻的OLED面板
+ HDR10 +
+ 有用的S-Pen
+ 强大的相机
+ 好的指纹传感器
+ 可扩展存储
+ 强大SoC
+ UFS 3.0闪存
+ 可选的5G型号
+ 出色的游戏性能

Cons

- 相对较慢的Wi-Fi
- 电池续航时间不足
- 没有3.5毫米耳机插孔
- 没有心率传感器
- 缺乏aptX HD支持
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (SM-N975F) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (SM-N975F) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

三星Galaxy Note 10+是一台极具吸引力的手机,但这一切是有代价的,特别是它的价格明显高于其前代产品。超声波指纹传感器和摄像头是相对Note 9的改进,但新的S-Pen手势的实用性值得怀疑。此外,虽然S-Pen很不错,但我们怀疑很少有人会在日常使用中从中获得任何加成。此外,我们无法理解为什么三星选择在其最昂贵的旗舰产品中省略1 TB选项和3D人脸识别功能。

大,强,美-三星Galaxy Note 10+是一款出色的智能手机,但没有提供比上一代Galaxy Note或者Galaxy S10更多的功能。

尽管如此,Note 10+是一款功能齐全的智能手机,除了耳机插孔之外,它包括了所有东西。三星对于支持某些蓝牙编解码器的固执己见也仍然困扰着我们。

尽管Exynos 9825的效率比其前任产品更高,但其优势只有在持续负载下才能体现出来。与我们测试过的先前旗舰三星智能手机一样,Note 10+的电池续航也很短。

总体而言,这是一款出色的旗舰产品,也是你可以买到的最好的智能手机之一。

Samsung Galaxy Note10+ - 09/27/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
87%
Display
90%
Games Performance
47 / 64 → 74%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
80%
Average
82%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Note10+智能手机评测:优化后的SoC保证更好的续航
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-11-17 (Update: 2019-11-17)