三星 Galaxy Note 5 (SM-N920A) 智能手机简短评测
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A (Galaxy Note Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T760 MP8
Memory
4 GB
, LPDDR4
Display
5.70 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 10点触控，电容式, Super AMOLED, 10点触控，电容式, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 32 GB
Weight
171 g, Power Supply: 40 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 418.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 394.8 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.49 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.98 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6382 K
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | Apple iPhone 6 Plus | Google Nexus 6 | Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | LG G Flex 2 | HTC One M9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -36% | -108% | -10% | -146% | -103% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 394.8 | 519 31% | 274 -31% | 335 -15% | 278 -30% | 474 20% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 397 | 496 25% | 264 -34% | 339 -15% | 274 -31% | 458 15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 90 -1% | 89 -2% | 92 1% | 97 7% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.62 | 0.4 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.49 | 3.67 -146% | 6.99 -369% | 1.77 -19% | 8.03 -439% | 6.32 -324% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.98 | 3.78 -91% | 4.01 -103% | 2.06 -4% | 6.71 -239% | 6.36 -221% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.03 108% | 2.41 91% | 1.89 116% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6382 102% | 7327 89% | 6329 103% | 6424 101% | 7750 84% | 8218 79% |
| Contrast (:1) | 837 | 1185 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 99 | 58.81 |
* ... smaller is better
| AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| LG G4 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| LG G4 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| LG G4 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G4 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| LG G4 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| LG G4 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Apple iPhone 6 Plus | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Google Nexus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
| Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| LG G Flex 2 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| OnePlus One | |
| LG G Flex 2 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| LG G4 | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
| Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 6 Plus 2915 mAh | Google Nexus 6 3220 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 4 3220 mAh | LG G Flex 2 3000 mAh | HTC One M9 2840 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -29% | -46% | -3% | -12% | -34% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 29.6 | 23.9 -19% | 19.2 -35% | 27.8 -6% | 21.2 -28% | 13.4 -55% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.2 | 10.7 49% | 5.8 -19% | |||
| Load (h) | 5.4 | 3.3 -39% | 2.3 -57% | 5.4 0% | 2.4 -56% | 3.9 -28% |
| WiFi (h) | 13 | 10 | 12.4 | 9.6 |
Pros
+ 明亮而更加精确的Super AMOLED 1440p屏幕
+ 相比Galaxy Note 4更加轻薄
+ 按键功能可正常使用
+ 金属边角，坚固机身
+ 高性能Exynos 7420处理器和4 GB内存
+ 优秀的户外实用性，高亮度
+ 出色的固态硬盘性能
+ 指纹传感器和心率计
+ Wi-Fi通话功能
Cons
- 不可更换电池
- 无双SIM卡功能
- 取消了对红外功能的支持
- 取消了对MHL的支持
- 取消了对MicroSD卡的支持
- 非USB Type-C接口
- 塑料后盖
- S Pen在长时间使用时不够顺手
- 和Galaxy Note 4一样的降频问题
- 一般的扬声器
如果你有了Note 4或者Galaxy S6的话还值不值得换Galaxy Note 5呢？支持按键的S Pen十分符合人体工程学的设计不只是一个新功能，加上更加精确的明亮屏幕很容易吸引骨灰级用户。不过对于已经拥有Note 4的用户来说，Note 5更像是横向走了一步而不是一个升级产品，因为它减少了很多功能（ MHL，红外传输，可更换电池，MicroSD读卡器）而增加了一些新功能（指纹识别，按键S Pen，改进的屏幕，更薄的设计）。同时，S6的用户可能会发现它除了屏幕更大之外其他的配置完全一样。这款机型的更准确命名可以叫“Galaxy Note S6”，由于它相比出色的Note 4并没有任何的实质性突破。
对于其他人来说Galaxy Note 5是一款值得试用一下的设备。它的S Pen对一部分用户来说会让日常使用变的得心应手，而对另外一些用户来说这根手写笔可能尺寸过小而让长时间使用变得不舒服。测试编辑就属于后者之一，不过它绚丽的屏幕和实用的S Pen功能仍然不容忽视。
相比前代产品并无实质性突破，Note 5仍然是一款出色的智能手机产品。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
- 04/18/2016 v5 (old)
Allen Ngo
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
