Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机

Name: Fairphone 5
Brand: Fairphone

良心危机 Fairphone 5 希望成为市场上最具可持续性和模块化的智能手机，在尽可能公平的条件下生产。尽管它注重可持续发展，但其目标是提供现代化的用户体验，并在至少八年内接受更新。我们的测试将评估这一理念的执行情况。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/01/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Renewable Smartphone Touchscreen

Fairphone 5 是继 Fairphone 4.

这家荷兰企业在 Fairphone 5 上更进一步，注重更高的调制程度、更公平的贸易和更多的可回收组件。所有这些都旨在使 Fairphone 5 成为世界上最公平、最可持续的智能手机。

它的价格较高，约为 750 美元，但它也拥有更多的技术。请继续阅读，了解 Fairphone 5 在日常生活中的表现。

Test device courtesy of Fairphone Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fairphone 5

Processor

Qualcomm QCM6490 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 643, Core: 812 MHz

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.46 inch 19.9:9, 2700 x 1224 pixel 459 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 226 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, magnetometer, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2 LE, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G, LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.6 x 161.6 x 75.83

Battery

16.25 Wh, 4200 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 3.87 V

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX800, f/1.9, 1.0 µm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Macro/Ultra Wide, IMX858, f/2.2, 0.7 µm) + TOF 3D; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung JN1, f/2.5, 0.74 µm)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 60 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; MIL-STD 810H (Drop test from 1.5m); IP55; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), QZSS (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); Audio Codecs Bluetooth: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless

Weight

212 g

Price

699 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.2 %	12/2023	Fairphone 5 QCM6490, Adreno 643	212 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.46"	2700x1224
88.9 %	11/2023	Google Pixel 8 Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	187 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.20"	2400x1080
90.5 %	03/2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
78.3 %	08/2023	Nokia G42 SD 480+, Adreno 619	194 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.56"	1612x720

外壳 - 回收塑料、怀旧元素和大猩猩玻璃

Fairphone 5 的屏占比高达 83%，也许不会给人留下超现代的印象，但它的设计简洁、美观。磨砂铝边框不易沾染指纹，智能手机有磨砂黑、天蓝和透明三种颜色可供选择。我们的测试设备使用的是透明款。

Fairphone 5 的机身重量减轻了一些，卡扣式机背增添了一丝怀旧感。背面由 18 个小塑料齿固定，需要用力才能松开，并小心地重新锁紧。盖子下面是可更换电池，取下后即可轻松触及。然后才是 nano-SIM 卡插槽和 microSD 卡插槽，这两个插槽都配有弹出机制。

在材料选择方面，Fairphone 5 非常重视可回收材料。值得注意的是，Fairphone 5 中 94% 的铝、82% 的镁、77% 的铟和 69% 的塑料都来自回收材料。锡、铜、镍和稀土的回收比例也相对较高。原材料的来源是另一个关键因素。Fairphone 5 采用的原材料（金：100%；钴：100%；银：100%；锂：99%；钨：99%）均来自非危机地区。供应商必须遵守安全和人道的工作条件标准（SA8000 和 ISO45001），智能手机的制造过程使用 100% 的可再生能源。

对于有兴趣进一步拆卸的用户，拆卸过程非常简单，只需使用十字螺丝，无需胶水。12 颗银色螺丝可以连接 USB 端口、扬声器、摄像头和卡槽。八颗黑色螺丝用于固定正面，在更换显示屏或前置摄像头时需要拧松。这种设计让许多用户可以自己进行常见的维修，提高了可维修性。值得注意的是，这款智能手机并不防水。不过，它的防护等级达到了 IP55，可以从任何角度防止灰尘和水柱的侵入。

连接性 - USB 3.2，支持 microSD

Fairphone 5 拥有标准功能。USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1）的运行速度高达 5 GBit/s，但在复制测试中表现较慢（139.55 MB/s）。在支持 OTG 的同时，该智能手机还支持有线图像输出，但仅限于屏幕镜像。由于 USB 端口不能识别 exFAT 或 NTFS，用户在将外置硬盘连接到智能手机时应确保格式正确。

该手机也没有 UWB 芯片、无线充电或专用安全芯片。

microSD 读卡器

值得注意的是，它还集成了 microSD 卡插槽，树立了典范。虽然它在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现令人印象深刻，但在复制测试中的传输速率却低于平均水平。与 USB 端口不同，microSD 卡插槽支持 exFAT 文件系统。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	57.33 MB/s +211%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.4 MB/s +16%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.45 MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	12.75 MB/s -31%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø22.2 (10.1-39.1)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.4 (32.1-55.6)

Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.9 (22.6-78.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.6 (43.7-98)

软件 - Fairphone 5 的最长更新保证期

Fairphone 5 预装了谷歌Android 13，预计至少在八年内会收到安全补丁和五次重大更新。 Android 因此，18 可以预见。

除谷歌应用程序外，智能手机上只有 "我的 Fairphone"应用程序，该程序收集有关技术状态的基本信息，并提供直接获取支持的途径。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 良好的跟踪性能和 6 GHz 无线局域网

Wi-Fi 6E 可用于家庭 Wi-Fi，也包括使用 6 GHz 频段。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Fairphone 5 不仅实现了很高的传输速率，而且基本稳定。

Fairphone 最多可通过 5G Sub5 接入数据网络，并提供极其广泛的频率支持。在大都市环境中接收特性良好，数据传输速率也达到了预期水平。

Networking
Fairphone 5
iperf3 receive AXE11000	814 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	926 (min: 473) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1845 (min: 1781) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1517 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000	891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia G42
iperf3 receive AXE11000	336 (min: 310) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	362 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼21%
Fairphone 4
iperf3 transmit AX12	327 (min: 315) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	344 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AX12	376 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼100%

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1845 (1781-1909)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1799 (1744-1867)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1515 (1476-1544)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1562-1612)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø813 (774-838)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1603-1686)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Qualcomm Adreno 643; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (473-975)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (1253-1880)

在室外，跟踪非常快速和精确，而在室内，则需要更长的时间，尤其是在 Fairphone 5 确定准确位置之前。不过，一旦确定位置，它就会非常精确。

这些特点在我们的短途试驾中也很明显，因为这款智能手机准确地记录了行驶路线，可与 Garmin Venu 2 直接比较。

电话功能和语音质量

当把 Fairphone 5 放在耳边时，它的语音质量很好，能可靠地过滤掉轻微的背景噪音。如果周围环境变得嘈杂，降噪功能就会达到极限，使说话者的声音大大减弱，并让背景噪音反复穿透。扬声器模式工作正常，只有轻微的混响效果。

Fairphone 有一个实体 nano-SIM 卡空间，也可以安装 eSIM 卡作为替代，以实现双 SIM 卡操作。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

摄像头 - Fairphone 5 配备了带 ToF 功能的出色双摄像头

Fairphone 5 的前置摄像头高达 5000 万像素，但采用了像素分选技术，最终成像只有 1250 万像素。画质尚可，但白天图像锐化严重，暗光下对比度较低。

背面的两个镜头也是各 5000 万像素，但它们的传感器不同。主镜头来自索尼，具有光学防抖功能。它能拍摄出相当不错的照片，尽管图像的动态范围应该更大一些。虽然超广角镜头很早就出现了噪点，但由于分辨率高，它在外围区域的成像性能也很稳定，细节也很丰富。该镜头也可用于微距拍摄，但会出现严重的虚化现象。变焦不是 Fairphone 的强项。

Fairphone 5 能以 30 FPS 的超高清速度录制双面视频。另外，全高清（或高清）也有 60 FPS。遗憾的是，只提供 16:9 格式，而且也不提供 24 FPS 的帧速率。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 注册后可使用五年

免费注册 Fairphone 5 后，智能手机的保修期将从 24 个月延长至五年，这在智能手机领域是绝无仅有的。

除了智能手机外，包装盒里仍然空空如也；甚至连充电线都没有。制造商解释说，大多数人已经拥有了最必要的配件。保护盖（每个约 43 美元）和屏幕保护膜（约 36 美元）可供选择。用户还可以在商店里购买备件，自行更换。

输入设备和操作 - Fairphone 5，最高 300 Hz

Fairphone 5 的电容式触摸屏采样率相对较高，达到 300 Hz，具有良好的滑动性能和可靠的响应。

边框或电源按钮上的指纹传感器确保了生物识别安全。识别率高，解锁速度快。通过前置摄像头进行面部识别的速度明显更快，但安全性也较低。

线性振动电机可提供精确而有吸引力的触觉反馈，声音可闻但不会太大。

显示屏 - 90-Hz OLED，带直流调光功能

Fairphone 5 的 6.49 英寸 OLED 显示屏像素密度高，显示内容清晰。制造商指定的亮度高达 800 cd/m²，但我们在测试中并未达到这一水平，相反，在纯白显示屏上，无论环境光传感器是否激活，平均亮度都为 617 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中，峰值也保持在类似水平；在显示 HDR 内容时，我们只能测量到 721 cd/m²。

最低亮度时，显示屏以 90 Hz 的频率持续闪烁；亮度稍高时，频率会翻倍。不过，频率非常均匀，因此出现投诉的风险很低，但我们不能排除这种可能性。可选的直流调光模式除了使面板变得稍暗之外，没有任何可识别或可测量的效果。事实上，直流调光似乎一直处于激活状态。


609 cd/m²	611 cd/m²	624 cd/m²
613 cd/m²	620 cd/m²	628 cd/m²
613 cd/m²	614 cd/m²	621 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 628 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 617 cd/m² Minimum: 5.91 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.85

	Fairphone 5 OLED, 2700x1224, 6.46	Google Pixel 8 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20	Samsung Galaxy S23 Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.10	Nokia G42 IPS, 1612x720, 6.56	Fairphone 4 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Screen		67%	35%	-40%	-2%
Brightness middle	620	1450 134%	1125 81%	495 -20%	513 -17%
Brightness	617	1410 129%	1122 82%	452 -27%	492 -20%
Brightness Distribution	97	92 -5%	96 -1%	84 -13%	88 -9%
Black Level *				0.5	0.54
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.4	1.1 68%	3.2 6%	6.09 -79%	2.96 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5	4.2 16%	4.9 2%	9.35 -87%	5.55 -11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	2.1 60%	3.3 37%	5.8 -12%	3.6 31%
Gamma	1.85 ^119%	2.24 ^98%	1.97 ^112%	2.325 ^95%	2.321 ^95%
CCT	6390 ^102%	6584 ^99%	6504 ^100%	8169 ^80%	6032 ^108%
Contrast				990	950

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

当我们使用 AMOLED 设置选择高级色彩模式并调整色温时，我们可以获得最佳的色彩表现（见上图）。然后，Fairphone 5 使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间，但灰度显示偏绿。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.884 ms rise
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7695 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.547 ms rise
10.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.37 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外，Fairphone 5 给人的印象不错。在阴天，显示屏更容易阅读，但在夏天，只有少数几个保护区可以使用。

性能 - 配备长寿命 SoC 的 Fairphone 5

Fairphone 5 的 SoC 采用了一种不同寻常的解决方案：高通 QCM6490。高通 QCM6490.这种芯片组实际上是为物联网产品而开发的，与骁龙 778G.QCM6490 的优势在于它是一款长寿命的 SoC，因此高通公司会在更长的时间内提供更新，使 Fairphone 操作系统的长更新周期成为可能。

不过，这款 SoC（2021 年推出）并非全新产品，它属于中高端产品，拥有 8 GB LPDDR4x 内存。从目前的情况来看，这足以让智能手机毫不费力地处理所有日常任务，但集成的 Adreno 643已经意味着在游戏方面必须做出妥协。现在很难预测三年、四年甚至七年后的情况。不过，从可能的长期使用情况来看，性能似乎还算稳定。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1549 Points +78%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1260 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +5%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	870 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	870 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	789 Points -9%
Fairphone 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	632 Points -27%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	554 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	4974 Points +69%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	3395 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2987 Points +1%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	2944 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	2944 Points 0%
Fairphone 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1855 Points -37%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1643 Points -44%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1984 Points +76%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1653 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points +23%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	1129 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	1129 Points 0%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	746 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	5149 Points +72%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4225 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points +28%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	2999 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	2999 Points 0%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1917 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1134684 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +24%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	603046 Points +1%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	597212 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	597212 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	540593 Points -9%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1508318 Points +123%
Average of class Smartphone (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)	1249818 Points +85%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1107295 Points +64%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	676317 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	676317 Points 0%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	15270 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	12699 Points +7%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	11866 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	11866 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	10897 Points -8%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10492 Points -12%
Fairphone 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	8035 Points -32%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1221 Points +54%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	955 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +5%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	794 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	794 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	734 Points -8%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	525 Points -34%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	8830 Points +77%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	6974 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +15%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	4997 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	4997 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4576 Points -8%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3311 Points -34%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	14401 Points +27%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	11327 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	11327 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	9876 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	8251 Points -27%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	6975 Points -38%
Memory
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	9115 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	8871 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5488 Points +7%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	5133 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	5133 Points 0%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3715 Points -28%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	26748 Points +249%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	18975 Points +147%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +85%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	7673 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	7673 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	6632 Points -14%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3826 Points -50%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1779 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1657 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +7%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	1398 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	1398 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1239 Points -11%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1213 Points -13%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	25563 Points +187%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +144%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	19875 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	16702 Points +87%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	8922 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	8922 Points 0%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5126 Points -43%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	25112 Points +3397%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +2384%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1320 Points +84%
Google Pixel 8 Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1136 Points +58%
Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490, Adreno 643, 8192	718 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	718 Points 0%
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	413 Points -42%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3699 Points +317%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2439 Points +175%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	887 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	681 Points -23%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	333 Points -62%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	288 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3857 Points +335%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points +173%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	887 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	687 Points -23%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	340 Points -62%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	294 Points -67%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13911 Points +344%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8977 Points +186%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3135 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2434 Points -22%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1119 Points -64%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	970 Points -69%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8635 Points +178%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3102 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2465 Points -21%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1124 Points -64%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	984 Points -68%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6185 Points +25%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4995 Points +1%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4960 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4897 Points -1%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3583 Points -28%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3359 Points -32%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21767 Points +205%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13546 Points +90%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7131 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5563 Points -22%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2814 Points -61%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2448 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13955 Points +115%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9813 Points +51%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6499 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5341 Points -18%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2955 Points -55%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2605 Points -60%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	108 fps +21%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	89 fps
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	83 fps -7%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps +189%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	317 fps +99%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	159 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	133 fps -16%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	91 fps -43%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +82%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +18%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps +5%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	66 fps
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps -6%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 fps +201%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps +8%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	78 fps -13%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	45 fps -50%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -54%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +145%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +33%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	49 fps 0%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	49 fps
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	30 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186 fps +170%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps +33%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -16%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps -52%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -58%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +289%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +107%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +4%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps 0%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	17 fps -39%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +208%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +85%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -15%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps -52%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +367%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps +167%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -10%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -10%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11 fps -48%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +250%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +106%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -28%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps -59%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.5 fps -64%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +264%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps +127%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -9%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -9%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +188%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +102%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -29%
Fairphone 4 Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -59%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -63%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +266%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps +95%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -28%
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.9 fps -65%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	158.595 Points +37%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)	115.42 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	115.4 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -8%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	104.25 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)	66.879 Points -42%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)	65.687 Points -43%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	146 Points +26%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)	116 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	116 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	94 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)	64 Points -45%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)	63 Points -46%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	59913 Points +54%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	47776 Points +23%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)	38966 Points
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	38966 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)	25439 Points -35%
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)	20689 Points -47%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia G42 (Chrome 115)	2279.9 ms * -107%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)	1742.9 ms * -58%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -45%
Fairphone 5 (Chrome 119)	1102.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm QCM6490 ()	1102 ms * -0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)	998 ms * +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)	701.7 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

	Fairphone 5	Samsung Galaxy S23	Nokia G42	Fairphone 4	Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		45%	-34%	-32%	12%	-4%	33%
Sequential Read 256KB	965.01	3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0) 225% 1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1) 75%	492.5 -49%	917 -5%	1008.77 5%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) -8%	1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years) 56%
Sequential Write 256KB	789.23	844 ?(UFS 4.0) 7% 628.53 ?(UFS 3.1) -20%	461.8 -41%	214.8 -73%	878.9 11%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) -13%	1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years) 41%
Random Read 4KB	226.8	427.61 ?(UFS 4.0) 89% 343.65 ?(UFS 3.1) 52%	183.3 -19%	158.5 -30%	244.85 8%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) -3%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years) 9%
Random Write 4KB	213.44	156.69 ?(UFS 4.0) -27% 130.26 ?(UFS 3.1) -39%	161.1 -25%	168.7 -21%	267.41 25%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) 8%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years) 27%

Gaming

Fairphone 5; Dead Trigger 2; 1.10.0: Ø59.9 (59-60)

Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø53.8 (35-61)

Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø40 (27-58)

Fairphone 5; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø39.8 (21-61)

Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.9.0: Ø59.3 (50-61)

Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.9.0: Ø39.6 (32-41)

Fairphone 5; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放量 - 变热，但保持稳定

温度

在负载情况下，Fairphone 5 的表面温度会变得很高，这是用烧毁基准来模拟的，但它们仍然保持在可接受的范围内。

在压力下，SoC 可以有效散热，防止性能大幅下降。

Max. Load

Idle


47 °C	46 °C	40 °C
48.1 °C	46.6 °C	41 °C
48.2 °C	43 °C	40.2 °C

Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 44.5 °C


38.9 °C	45.4 °C	47.3 °C
40.6 °C	40.9 °C	49.7 °C
36.1 °C	40.8 °C	48.9 °C

Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 43.2 °C

Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.3 %
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % 0%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83.4 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.6 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 % 0%
Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 %
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.8 % -46%

Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.32 (5.32-5.33)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.09 (4.08-4.1)

Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.5 (18.4-18.6)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14.6-14.7)

Fairphone 5 Adreno 643, QCM6490, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø18.7 (18.6-18.8)

发言人

Fairphone 5 的两个扬声器音质适中。中等音量时，音质会显得空洞和尖锐，音量越大，这种情况就越明显，从而导致失真。

要扩大声音输出，建议使用 USB 或蓝牙，后者提供广泛的音频编解码支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Fairphone 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 仅 4,200 毫安时，耗电量大

耗电量

Fairphone 5 在各种情况下都表现出较高的耗电量，这表明它的电池续航能力并不特别突出。

虽然 Fairphone 没有提供有关支持的充电技术的详细信息，但他们提到使用 30 瓦的电源装置可在 20 分钟内将电池电量充至 50%。一个积极的方面是，用户无需工具即可更换电池。遗憾的是，Fairphone 5 不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.44 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	1.42 / 2.43 / 2.47 Watt
Load	8.95 / 9.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fairphone 5 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm QCM6490	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		38%	57%	46%	0%	33%
Idle Minimum *	1.42	0.56 61%	0.57 60%	0.97 32%	1.42 ?() -0%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Average *	2.43	1.08 56%	0.74 70%	1.13 53%	2.43 ?() -0%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Maximum *	2.47	1.17 53%	0.83 66%	1.44 42%	2.47 ?() -0%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 34%
Load Average *	8.95	8.01 11%	4.26 52%	3.26 64%	8.95 ?() -0%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) 38%
Load Maximum *	9.99	8.89 11%	6.16 38%	6.29 37%	9.99 ?() -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 17%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.61 (1.559-10.3)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.56 (0.976-7.72)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.702 (1.62-1.838)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.87 (5.44-7.13)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.66 (3.3-5.13)

Fairphone 5 Qualcomm QCM6490; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.702 (1.62-1.838)

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)

电池寿命

尽管在同类产品中，Fairphone 5 的电池容量并不是最小的，但在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的 WLAN 实际测试中，它的表现却明显落后。

这一点在日常使用中也很明显。电池电量消耗很快，尤其是在使用手机时。不过，Fairphone 5 在待机模式下还是很经济的。可以想象，制造商通过一两次升级就能改善这一状况。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 119)		9h 35min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Fairphone 5 4200 mAh	575 min
Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh	814 min
Samsung Galaxy S23 3900 mAh	926 min
Nokia G42 5000 mAh	933 min
Fairphone 4 3905 mAh	804 min

Pros

+ 人与环境的可持续理念

+ 许多维修工作可以自己完成

+ 长期更新供应

+ 长期保修

+ eSIM、USB 3.2 和 microSD

Cons

- 显示屏的校准可以做得更好

- 扬声器较弱

- 负载时表面温度较高

- 电池运行时间适中

评语 - 无怨无悔的智能手机

Fairphone 5 是目前最具可持续性的智能手机之一，它强调在生产和原材料提取过程中公平对待人类。它承诺采用高比例的可回收元件、五年保修和八年更新，体现了可持续发展的典范。典范！

Fairphone 5 是一款值得称赞的日常伴侣，它融合了社会责任和最小的生态影响。

Fairphone 5 拥有多项技术功能，包括频率范围宽广的 5G、6 GHz WLAN、microSD 和 eSIM 支持。USB 3.2 端口提供有线图像输出，尽管复制速度相对较慢。UWB 和无线充电功能不在其列，而且该设备没有防尘和防水认证。不过，它的模块化设计允许用户在不同区域进行维修。

Fairphone 5 的 OLED 显示屏亮度可略有提高，改进校准可增强其整体性能。视角不同，显示屏会呈现绿色。虽然扬声器可能不是特别令人印象深刻，尤其是在音量较大时，但它们仍能达到目的。考虑到中端芯片组已经使用了两年，八年的跨度可能会带来寿命方面的挑战，人们对 SoC 的评价不一。

如果您的首选是一款公平、可持续生产、100% 可回收的通讯工具，那么 Fairphone 5 将是您的不二之选。只有像素 8的升级幅度更大。三星也非常重视可维修性，已经为 Galaxy S23等设备提供了同等的自修工具包。

价格和供应情况

Fairphone 5 可直接从制造商的在线商店购买。也可从亚马逊购买。

Fairphone 5 - 2023-11-30 11/30/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

55 / 70 → 79%

Weight

88%

Battery

88%

Display

88%

Games Performance

58 / 64 → 91%

Application Performance

80 / 86 → 93%

Temperature

83%

Noise

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

58%

Average

78%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Carmen Pol - Translator - 115 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机

Daniel Schmidt, 2023-12- 1 (Update: 2023-12- 1)

Fairphone 5 评测--8 年更新、5 年保修的可持续智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 回收塑料、怀旧元素和大猩猩玻璃

尺寸比较

连接性 - USB 3.2，支持 microSD

microSD 读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - Fairphone 5 的最长更新保证期

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 良好的跟踪性能和 6 GHz 无线局域网

电话功能和语音质量

摄像头 - Fairphone 5 配备了带 ToF 功能的出色双摄像头

配件和保修 - 注册后可使用五年

输入设备和操作 - Fairphone 5，最高 300 Hz

显示屏 - 90-Hz OLED，带直流调光功能

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备长寿命 SoC 的 Fairphone 5

Gaming

排放量 - 变热，但保持稳定

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Fairphone 5 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 仅 4,200 毫安时，耗电量大

耗电量

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语 - 无怨无悔的智能手机

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare