Notebookcheck Logo

小米Poco X5 Pro评测--拥有108MP和120Hz Flow AMOLED的轻型5G智能手机 (Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition)

同价位段中最好的智能手机? 就X5 Pro而言,波克公司宣传的内容毫不逊色。凭借强大的Snapdragon芯片组、灵活的AMOLED显示屏和108万像素的摄像头,我们对Poco智能手机的测试所有迹象都很好。但是,这是否足以成为对Poco智能手机的购买建议?
5G Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

由于Poco X5 Pro在国际上以Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition的名义销售,因此与Redmi Note 12 Pro兄弟姐妹机型的许多相似之处并不十分令人惊讶。但同样是与处理器相比,除了SoC升级之外,并没有很多名义上的变化。骁龙778G智能手机配备了大而快的6.67英寸120赫兹AMOLED显示屏,使用1/1.52英寸的三星ISOCELL HM2传感器作为主摄像头。

获得杜比视界和杜比全景声认证的Poco X5 Pro的建议零售价为349.90欧元(约384美元),包括6GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 2.2存储。带有8GB+256GB的顶级版本的建议零售价为399.90欧元(约合439美元),尽管在我们测试时,在某些情况下价格已经大幅下降到300欧元大关(约合329美元)。

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Poco X5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G: n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/66(60 MHz), 38/40/41; 3G: 1/2/4/5/8; 2G: 850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.91 x 76.03
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 1/3.06" 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, case, USB cable, charger, info material , MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.99W/​kg head, 0.99W/​kg body, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
181 g, Power Supply: 131 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
181 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.5 %
07/2022
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
205 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
187 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.6 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
155 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.30"2400x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
蓝色的Poco X5 Pro
蓝色的Poco X5 Pro
黄色的Poco X5 Pro
黄色的Poco X5 Pro

Poco X5 Pro有三种颜色:黑色、蓝色和黄色。虽然塑料背面是消光的,但大的相机模块保持着深色的光泽,导致指纹在这个区域迅速聚集。 对于中端智能手机来说,做工和触觉的质量处于坚实的水平,但采用玻璃背面的Redmi Note 12 Pro散发着更多的质量。

这款中端智能手机几乎不重181克(约6.4盎司),不仅比它的前辈更轻,而且外壳厚度不到8毫米(约0.3英寸),也更薄。 这是由Flow Display技术的P-OLED材料实现的。X5 Pro显示屏的显示部件完全由塑料制成,而不是将OLED组件分层在玻璃内。这使得OLED显示屏更加灵活,所以它也可以做得更薄。

Poco智能手机的正面由防刮的大猩猩5号玻璃组成,均匀地过渡到金属框架。显示屏和外壳正面之间的比例为87%。和它的前辈一样,Poco X5 Pro也包括根据IP53的IP认证,提供溅水保护。

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

尺寸比较

164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 205 g162.91 mm 76.03 mm 7.9 mm 181 g162.9 mm 76 mm 7.9 mm 187 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g152.9 mm 71.2 mm 7.75 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--小米智能手机与红外辐射器

X5 Pro 拥有蓝牙5.2、立体声扬声器、红外辐射器和用于非接触式支付的NFC,以及一个3.5毫米音频端口,为中端产品提供了一个全面的设备包。 我们的测试装置包括256GB的UFS 2.2存储空间,但由于操作系统和几个预装的应用程序,实际可用的存储空间要小一些,为224GB。那些需要额外空间存放视频或照片的人可以通过USB OTG将它们存放在外部存储介质上,如U盘。目前的X Pro系列不允许你通过使用micoSD卡来扩展存储空间。

Redmi Note 12 Pro一样来自Poco的兄弟姐妹机型的USB-C连接只支持2.0规格,这意味着你不能用它与中档智能手机进行有线图像输出。在我们用连接的M2固态硬盘(三星980 Pro)进行的拷贝测试中,USB端口的传输速度很低,只有32MB/s。另一方面,你可以通过Miracast使用无线传输显示内容到外部显示器,并通过Widevine L1以高清质量观看流媒体服务的视频内容。

底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽)
顶部(音频端口、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器)
顶部(音频端口、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器)
右侧(按键:音量、开/关)。
右侧(按键:音量、开/关)。
左侧
左侧

软件 - Poco智能手机与Android 12

小米将Android 操作系统和其内部的MIUI用户界面结合起来,推出了Poco 14版本。在我们测试的时候,X5 Pro只使用了Android 12和2023年1月的安全补丁。不幸的是,我们向德国Poco公司提出的关于保证升级期限的问题仍然没有得到答复。Note 12 Pro的兄弟姐妹机型应该会收到两个大的Android ,我们可以假设Poco智能手机也有类似的支持。然而,你应该记住,你已经需要一次重大的操作系统升级,将X5 Pro更新到目前的Android 13,因此,下一个Android 代(Android 14)可能将是X5 Pro的终点。

在我们看来,这家中国制造商在这里不幸地节省了开支,例如,三星表明在软件维护方面,中端产品也可以做得更好。 A Galaxy A34收到四个主要的更新和五年的软件支持。你可能不能指望像Poco X5 Pro的前身那样有超过三年的安全更新。

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

通信和GNSS - 小米智能手机的5G功能

X5 Pro的集成WLAN模块支持Wi-Fi 6和符合IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准的协议。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,Poco在发送时实现了近1000 Mbit/s的传输速率,这在中端产品中是非常好的。 与Wi-Fi 5智能手机相比,如 三星Galaxy A53,这变成了两倍高。

另一方面,在使用移动互联网时,你必须接受一些小的妥协。尽管X5 Pro可以接入5G网络,但其内置的骁龙X53调制解调器只覆盖13个LTE频率。作为对比,Note 12 Pro的兄弟姐妹机型可以接入20个频段。有了这个,由于频率覆盖有限,旅行时使用Poco智能手机可能会成为问题。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 (790min - 837max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
805 (686min - 905max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)
655 MBit/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -57%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (323min - 353max) MBit/s -57%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (124min - 352max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)
692 MBit/s -29%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (346min - 370max) MBit/s -63%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
349 (317min - 362max) MBit/s -64%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -72%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (686-905)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø321 (124-352)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (487-997)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (317-362)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

Poco X5 Pro通过主要的GPS、伽利略、格洛纳斯和北斗卫星系统确定其位置,但只在单频段。另一方面,即使在室内,信号强度也相当高,信噪比值超过30,而且定位精度也非常高,达到3米。

为了评估这款中档智能手机在实践中的定位精度,我们与Garmin Venu 2平行记录了一条路线进行比较。即使我们在Poco智能手机记录的路线细节中看到一些偏差,但路线往往与Gamin智能手表记录的路线相同。在10公里(约6.2英里)的测试路线结束时,两台设备的记录差异只有50米(约164英尺)。因此,X5 Pro非常适用于日常导航任务。

定位:Poco X5 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2
定位:Poco X5 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量--双卡双待的Poco X5 Pro

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

Poco X5 Pro支持两个Nano-SIM卡的双SIM 5G,以及VoLTE标准和WLAN通话,但不支持eSIM。语音质量非常令人满意,声音被清晰地再现出来。我们的对话伙伴描述说,用X5 Pro的两个麦克风进行的语音录制的质量非常清晰。在使用立体声扬声器的视频会议中,声音也是清晰可懂的,而且足够响亮。

照相机 - 小米智能手机,108MP

用1600万像素的前置摄像头拍照模式
用1600万像素的前置摄像头拍照模式
1600万像素前置摄像头的人像模式
1600万像素前置摄像头的人像模式

X5 Pro的主摄像头是基于一个 "老熟人",即三星HM2,它已经被用于 X4 Pro.108万像素的主摄像头(f/1.9)通过9-in-1像素分选记录12万像素的照片,但仍然不提供光学图像稳定,导致照片相当快地变得模糊,特别是在黑暗中。

在光线充足的情况下,照片以非常漂亮的图像清晰度和许多细节给人留下深刻印象。我们也喜欢照片的动态。然而,Poco X5 Pro再现的色彩非常鲜艳,尤其是在绿色调方面,显得略微不自然,比如我们对比照片中的草地。在弱光条件下,Poco智能手机也很快达到了它的极限。一方面,由于它的大光圈,照片看起来没有Pixel 6a的那么暗。 Pixel 6a,而且噪音水平也相当低。另一方面,物体的轮廓看起来非常柔和。

超广角
超广角
广角
广角
2倍变焦
2倍变焦
5倍变焦
5倍变焦
10倍变焦
10倍变焦

超广角镜头的120度相对较窄的视角在这个价格范围内产生了一个体面的图像质量,但800万像素的照片其实并不那么令人愉快。照片显示了许多不规则的地方,只在图像中心提供了坚实的锐度。由于X5 Pro中没有留下任何长焦镜头的空间,所以放大的效果完全是通过数字创建的,而结果也相应地很弱。

与此相反的是X4 Pro最后,Poco中端机也能以UHD分辨率录制视频。如果你想要60帧,你只能使用1080p。108万像素相机的电子防抖功能还不错,在白天的条件下,运动被稳固地记录下来。

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
click to load images

我们分析了三星HM2传感器在受控光线条件下的色彩再现,并与实际参考色彩进行了对比。除了智能手机典型的增亮外,X5 Pro在ColorChecker护照的绿色色调中显示出较大的偏差,考虑到饱和的对比照片,这并不令人惊讶。然而,Poco智能手机总体上 只显示了很少的色彩偏差异常值(>10)。

ColorChecker
13.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: 7.95 ∆E min: 2.32 - max: 17.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
38 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
33 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
28 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
30 ∆E
73 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
75 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: 43.91 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 75.02 ∆E

配件和保修 - Poco智能手机和附带的充电器

Poco X5 Pro的67瓦充电器
Poco X5 Pro的67瓦充电器

这款中档智能手机的包装盒包括一个67瓦的模块化充电器,一条数据和充电线,一个保护套,一个SIM卡工具,以及快速启动说明和保修信息。制造商在其网上商店没有为X5 Pro提供任何特定的配件。

小米在德国为其智能手机提供12个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁的Poco智能手机

6.67英寸大的Flow AMOLED点阵显示屏上的输入,其扫描率为240赫兹,可以快速准确地实现到触摸屏的角落。小米还为其智能手机中端配备了一个有吸引力的振动马达,在日常操作中提供非常准确的触觉反馈

开/关按钮中的主动式指纹传感器很容易触及,并能非常可靠地解锁X5 Pro,而且也相当快。还有不太安全的二维人脸识别,它是基于通过前置摄像头的人脸解锁功能。在日光条件下,它的工作速度同样很快。

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试

显示屏 - 配备OLED的Poco X5 Pro

显示子像素网格
显示子像素网格

Poco X5 Pro的6.67英寸AMOLED显示屏具有2400 x 1,080像素的分辨率,支持最大刷新率达120赫兹。那些想节省一些电池寿命的人也可以在自动模式下使用该显示屏。这里使用的是60和120赫兹的刷新率,在我们的测试中也实现得很好。

在我们的亮度测量中,OLED面板在全区白色显示下平均达到770cd/m²,这对这个价格级别来说是令人满意的,但比Redmi Note 12 Pro要低。在更能代表日常操作的APL18测量中,它在图像中心达到774 cd/m²。

由于采用了OLED面板,PWM技术连同其显示闪烁被用来控制显示亮度。 我们测量到一个恒定的120赫兹,振幅均匀。然而,制造商谈到了1920赫兹的非常高的PWM频率,这将是更舒适的,特别是对于更敏感的用户。最后,我们无法确定这里的差异是由于我们的测量设备造成的,还是这样一种类似于自动直流调光的模式根本没有激活。

769
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
768
cd/m²
770
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
792
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 795 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 778.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 770 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.30
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
6%
32%
1%
-6%
Brightness middle
770
687
-11%
938
22%
984
28%
718
-7%
Brightness
778
694
-11%
939
21%
992
28%
730
-6%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
96
-1%
98
1%
92
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.2
25%
0.9
44%
1.6
-0%
1.62
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
4
-21%
1.6
52%
3.8
-15%
4.21
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1
55%
1
55%
3
-36%
2
9%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.25 98%
2.14 103%
2.156 102%
CCT
6882 94%
6496 100%
6350 102%
6518 100%
6545 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小的显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们使用Calman分析软件评估AMOLED面板的色彩校准。在默认设置(标准配置文件)中,sRGB色彩空间是目标,几乎完全覆盖。在Vivid profile中,我们也只确定了与较大的DCI-P3色彩空间的小偏差。在单独的颜色中几乎没有任何明显的差异。我们测量的DeltaE值显示颜色的偏差非常低(<2)。灰度的显示也只显示了一个小的偏差,保持在目标范围内(<3)。

小米高端Poco X5 Pro提供了三个颜色配置文件,还有一个 "调整 "模式,你可以调整色温以及单一参数,如饱和度或色彩空间。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:鲜艳,温暖)
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:鲜艳,温暖)
灰度(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:生动,温暖)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:生动,温暖)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:生动,温暖)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:生动,温暖)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:鲜艳,温暖)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:鲜艳,温暖)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6325 ms rise
↘ 0.69 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7425 ms rise
↘ 0.827 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

这款中档智能手机证明了自己在户外使用时装备精良,即使反射可能很烦人。由于高亮度和强大的对比度,即使在阳光直射下,内容也能保持足够的可读性。然而,你应该记住,没有激活亮度传感器的最大亮度只有494cd/m²。

视角的稳定性非常好,但在非常陡峭的视角下,亮度会有明显的损失。虽然你几乎看不出颜色有任何变化,但显示屏看起来稍微有点冷。

小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
小米Poco X5 Pro智能手机测试
Poco X5 Pro的可视角度
Poco X5 Pro的可视角度

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米智能手机

在Poco X5 Pro中,一个骁龙778G集成了两个集群的八个核心,并配备了 阿德雷诺642L图形单元。由于内部的RAM扩展技术,高达5GB的可用ROM存储可以转化为虚拟工作存储器,允许你通过这种方式将内部RAM扩展到最大的13GB。

在我们的CPU基准测试包中,Poco智能手机略微领先于Note 12 Pro的兄弟姐妹机型,后者使用的是 联发科Dimensity 1080.特别是在Geekbench的多分数中,由于额外的ARM Cortex A78核心,骁龙778G应该被认为更强大。总的来说,其结果明显高于前代产品的性能水平。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
789 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=11)
781 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
765 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
694 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
666 Points -16%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=11)
2882 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2038 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2035 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1928 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1022 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  ()
1022 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
968 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  ()
2987 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2201 Points -26%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
540593 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 540593, n=11)
501252 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
404846 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
383847 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12699 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11763 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)
11756 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=10)
11553 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10571 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9741 Points -23%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
835 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
734 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
665 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (621 - 734, n=5)
663 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
604 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
574 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4576 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4079 - 5002, n=11)
4549 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4189 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3822 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3794 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -21%
System
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
9876 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=11)
9736 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7950 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7736 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6684 Points -32%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5938 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5488 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=11)
4968 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4593 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4452 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -30%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6594 - 6783, n=11)
6686 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6632 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5093 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4401 Points -34%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4375 Points -34%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1521 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1378 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1155 - 1534, n=11)
1336 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1283 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1239 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -2%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
21997 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19875 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7622 - 19875, n=5)
12471 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7638 Points -62%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7617 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -79%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
25112 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  ()
25112 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8784 Points -65%

我们在图形测试中看到类似的情况,但基准值在这里相差更远。在GFXBench和3DMark测量 Poco X5 Pro比 Note 12 Pro的兄弟姐妹型号领先约20-25%,有时甚至40%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
681 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
371 Points -46%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
643 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points -47%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2287 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1227 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2465 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2273 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1292 Points -48%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1208 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2763 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2736 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2701 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2521 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5311 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4198 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2731 Points -49%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2692 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4276 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3784 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points -17%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2738 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2694 Points -37%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4411 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3241 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -37%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5563 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4387 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points -46%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2967 Points -47%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5341 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4362 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points -42%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3024 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -19%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -39%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -29%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -37%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -34%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -26%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -37%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps -37%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -37%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -40%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -39%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps -41%

小米智能手机同样在浏览器速度方面没有表现出弱点,尽管它在基准测试结果中不再占主导地位。但是,网站的渲染速度仍然很快,而且可以流畅地滚动。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=11)
75.1 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (Chrome 106)
72.259 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71.873 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
66.879 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
64.534 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points -5%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
62.9 runs/min +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=9)
56.2 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
55.8 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
42.4 runs/min -24%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
99.9 Points +56%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
75 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (64 - 74, n=4)
71.3 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
65 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
64 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=10)
107 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
102 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
94 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
31662 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
27593 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=11)
27285 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
25439 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
22938 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
1982.32 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
1766.4 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro (Chrome 111)
1742.9 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=11)
1620 ms * +7%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * +8%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)
1501.9 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面,Poco X5 Pro的UFS存储提供了一个良好的性能。特别是在写入时,AndroBench的结果非常好,与X4 Pro相比,几乎是其两倍 X4 Pro.

Xiaomi Poco X5 ProXiaomi Poco X4 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GMotorola Edge 30 NeoSamsung Galaxy A53Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-43%
-4%
-40%
-30%
-15%
20%
Sequential Read 256KB
1008.77
303.4
-70%
1008.8
0%
498.82
-51%
510.1
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
878.9
483.33
-45%
865.59
-2%
469.52
-47%
486.7
-45%
690 ?(369 - 913, n=22)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
244.85
193.45
-21%
241.83
-1%
180.19
-26%
229.9
-6%
Random Write 4KB
267.41
173.03
-35%
234.21
-12%
169.19
-37%
210.8
-21%

游戏--Poco X5 Pro达到120帧

那些想用智能手机玩一些Play商店的游戏的人,肯定可以用Poco X5 Pro来做。伴随着8GB的工作内存、 Adreno 642L在我们使用GameBench的应用程序的测量中能够达到良好的数值。.

在中等细节(高清模式)下,PUBG手机的帧率保持在40帧。如果我们在测试中减少图形细节,图形单元会达到每秒60帧的恒定水平。要求不高的游戏,如Armajet,能够使用OLED面板的全部120赫兹,至少有时如此。然而,在很短的时间内,帧率下降到约70帧。Note 12 Pro在这里保持更稳定。

PUGB手机
PUGB手机
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro; Armajet: Ø102.9 (69-120)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.1 (55-60)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.8 (36-41)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.7 (36-41)

排放--Poco智能手机保持冷静

温度

在日常操作中,Poco X5 Pro对机箱的表面温度保持了非常好的控制。3DMark的Wild Life压力测试也显示,对于高通SoC来说,系统性能的节流程度很小。高通SoC.然而,我们仍然能够检测到在高负载(游戏)下帧率的降低,例如在Armajet中。

Max. Load
 32.8 °C31.7 °C31.3 °C 
 32.6 °C32.4 °C30.6 °C 
 30.4 °C30.8 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
30.1 °C31.2 °C31.5 °C
29.7 °C30 °C32 °C
29.9 °C29.9 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % -2%
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.09 (4.08-4.1)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.79-3.8)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14.6-14.7)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.24-7.28)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

发言人

在超过90分贝的情况下,Poco X5 Pro的双扬声器系统可以变得非常响亮,由于立体声和均匀的中音和高音,对于一款中端智能手机来说,听起来也很有吸引力。即使这两个扬声器缺乏低音,你仍然可以在声音频谱中听到一些轻微的低音。

耳机可以通过音频端口连接。在我们的测量中,信噪比水平达到了非常好的91dBFS,所以3.5毫米音频端口提供了非常低的噪音连接和高信号质量。那些喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线连接的人还可以使用许多音频编解码器,如SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX adaptive、LDAC和LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.632.2253028.33124.525.44025.8365037.537.46325.234.88020.233.910020.43412517.541.116014.447.920014.348.625015.252.131511.954.240013.55750012.166.563012.467.380011.771.2100011.878.9125011.479.6160012.378.4200012.274.9250012.178.3315012.282.4400012.982.7500013.479630013.279.2800012.978.21000013.676.61250013.469.31600013.264.7SPL24.890.8N0.683.5median 12.9median 74.9Delta0.910.25338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X5 ProSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--带快速充电的Poco X5 Pro

消耗功率

Poco X5 Pro有一个5000毫安时的电池,可以通过有线连接以高达67瓦的速度充电。幸运的是,盒子里还包括一个足够快的充电器。使用内部的 "Turbo Charging "快速充电技术,完全充电大约需要45分钟。不支持无线充电,但Poco智能手机可以作为一个5瓦的电源银行使用。

耗电量不明显。特别是在空闲运行期间,其他同类智能手机的耗电量比Poco X5 Pro大。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.97 / 1.13 / 1.44 Watt
Load midlight 3.26 / 6.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
4020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-28%
-1%
-22%
-42%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.97
1.01
-4%
0.99
-2%
0.9
7%
0.9
7%
1.106 ?(0.78 - 2.5, n=10)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.73
-53%
2.03
-80%
1.55
-37%
1.3
-15%
2.07 ?(1.13 - 5, n=10)
-83%
Idle Maximum *
1.44
1.79
-24%
2.08
-44%
1.56
-8%
1.6
-11%
2.32 ?(1.44 - 5.6, n=10)
-61%
Load Average *
3.26
3.05
6%
3.97
-22%
2.82
13%
5.7
-75%
4.17 ?(3.23 - 7.8, n=10)
-28%
Load Maximum *
6.29
4.91
22%
5.85
7%
4.97
21%
7.3
-16%
7.81 ?(6.29 - 14, n=10)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.56 (0.976-7.72)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.64 (1.076-6.72)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.084-1.374)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.66 (3.3-5.13)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.95 (2.62-3.28)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.824-1.465)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.084-1.374)

电池寿命

在我们的两个现实的电池测试中,为了便于比较,在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下运行,Poco X5 Pro在固定的120Hz显示刷新率下达到了有吸引力的电池寿命。

在我们的WLAN测试中,这款中端智能手机设法持续了近14个小时,在停用WLAN模块的持续视频循环中,它甚至再次持续了4个小时。 与前代产品相比,这是一个轻微的电池寿命增加3-5%。另一方面,在负载情况下,大约5小时后灯就会熄灭。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 11min
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
4020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
9%
-13%
20%
Reader / Idle
1297
1575
21%
1598
23%
2431
87%
H.264
1067
1033
-3%
1043
-2%
1146
7%
WiFi v1.3
827
739
-11%
978
18%
721
-13%
886
7%
Load
311
432
39%
299
-4%
246
-21%

Pros

+ 美丽的OLED显示屏
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的性能
+ 含充电器
+ 广泛的设备(3.5毫米音频端口,nfc,hdr10+,...)。

Cons

- 大量的塑料和外壳不防水
- 软件支持
- 只有少数LTE频率

对Poco X5 Pro的评价

测试Poco X5 Pro。测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。
测试Poco X5 Pro。测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。

对于一款相对实惠的中端智能手机--在我们测试时,价格约为290欧元(约318美元)--Poco X5 Pro几乎带来了价格敏感的买家所期望的一切:强大的硬件,快速的通信模块,以及广泛的设备

那些可以接受较少SoC功率的人将在Note 12 Pro中找到一个有趣的替代品,因为这个兄弟姐妹机型提供了更好的主摄像头和略高的外壳质量。由于其塑料外壳,不幸的是,后者不是Poco X5 Pro的优势之一。

对于那些不喜欢更新的人来说,Poco X5 Pro是一款很棒的300欧元智能手机。然而,X3 Pro的用户肯定会希望有更好的SoC,因为在过去两代X Pro系列的性能方面没有什么变化。

不幸的是,这家中国制造商在软件方面有所节省,确切地说,是在支持方面。对于一个仍然使用Android 12的智能手机来说,只有两个大型的Android 更新,已经不能真正达到当前的标准了。同样,安全更新之间的长间隔也不属于中端产品了。在这里,三星展示了如何通过其 Galaxy A34.

价格和可用性

虽然Poco X5 Pro不能从美国供应商那里买到,但你可以从国际供应商那里得到它,如Aliexpress,价格为284美元。,比如说。小米公司将其列为,价格为369英镑在英国 ,而亚马逊在印度的报价为27,999卢比

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro - 04/17/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
50 / 64 → 78%
Application Performance
84 / 86 → 98%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
67%
Average
80%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Poco X5 Pro评测--拥有108MP和120Hz Flow AMOLED的轻型5G智能手机 (Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition)
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-04-22 (Update: 2023-04-22)