诺基亚 G42 5G 智能手机评测--这款引人注目的手机甚至可以更换电池
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.3 % | 08/2023 | Nokia G42 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 194 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
79.1 % | 03/2023 | Motorola Moto G53 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79.4 % | 05/2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 202 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
81.7 % | 06/2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 需要时非常醒目
当然,你可以选择诺基亚 G42 的 "So Grey "配色版本,这样你就可以得到一款设计相当经典的手机,圆角设计,塑料背壳也含有可回收材料,显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 3 保护。然而,只有选择了紫色的 "So Purple "版本,这款手机才会变得真正令人兴奋:这时,小颗粒会闪闪发光,光反射会在背面闪烁,相机模块的颜色也会与紫色设计相适应。
无论如何,这款 194 克重的手机拿在手上非常舒适,而且无法扭动。不过,你可以把后盖往中间按一点,压力也会传到屏幕的液晶上。诺基亚手机采用无塑料包装,并与 iFixit 合作提供https://store.ifixit.de/collections/nokia-parts相对便宜的替换零件,以及更换电池、屏幕或后盖的说明。这并不是什么巫术,但也不容易到外行都敢做的地步。
手机配备了 NFC 功能,因此可以顺利使用移动支付服务。还可以使用 FM 收音机,这在没有网络连接或不想耗费数据量时非常方便。不过,包装中并没有提供合适的耳机作为天线替代品。
诺基亚 G42 是一款双 SIM 卡手机,但其中一个 SIM 卡插槽也可用作 microSD 插槽,因此您必须决定使用哪个插槽。如果使用 microSD,那么在我们的测试中,该读卡器在与参考 microSD Angelbird V60 的复制测试中被证明有点慢,但在 CPDT 基准测试中再次取得了不错的成绩,因此总体速度适中是意料之中的。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G53 (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Nokia G42 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 船上的现代移动通信
诺基亚 G42 是一款 5G 智能手机,因此您也可以使用最快的移动标准。这款手机提供足够的 LTE 和 5G 频率,可以在国外使用,但您应该事先确认是否可以在现场使用手机上网。在我们的测试阶段,接收强度处于较高水平。
WiFi 5 集成了最快的 WLAN 标准。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中,诺基亚 G42 的传输速率非常稳定,在 317 - 380 Mbps 的标准范围内。虽然千兆线路无法充分利用,但对于快速加载和下载页面仍然足够。
Android 诺基亚 G42 ex-works 上安装了 13 个未作更改的界面,但制造商添加了一些第三方应用程序,例如来自购物门户网站的应用程序。这些应用可以顺利卸载。在测试时,安全更新是从 2023 年 6 月开始的,因此仍然相当及时。制造商承诺,自上市起,3 年内都会进行安全更新,直至 2026 年。操作系统也应该会有两个主要版本,因此手机也应该会收到 15。Android
触摸屏使用起来非常顺手,由于采用了 90 Hz 显示屏,操作看起来更加流畅。外壳右侧是待机键,同时也是指纹传感器。通过它可以对手机进行生物解锁。只需进行一次教导,就能非常可靠地进行解锁,但诺基亚 G42 在解锁屏幕之前偶尔会有短暂的延迟。人脸识别也可以使用。这种方法也能可靠地工作,但由于识别的是二维图像,因此不太安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Nokia G42 | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Nokia G42 |
相机 - 照片清晰度高
背面有三个相机镜头。200 万像素的微距镜头主要用于抓拍,只能在相机软件的特殊模式下使用。深度摄像头只能为人像模糊效果提供额外信息,不能拍摄自己的照片。剩下的主摄像头像素为 5000 万,采用常见的三星 Isocell JN1 传感器。
诺基亚 5G 手机拍摄的照片清晰度不错,但你很快就会发现,雨天的动态范围很小。在更高质量的相机中,细节多样性也更高。在弱光环境下,亮部和暗部都会丢失很多细节,但照明区域的质量还不错。主摄像头在实验室中表现出色,边缘几乎没有锐度损失。
视频可以 1080p 格式录制,最高 30 fps。自动对焦工作迅速,没有抽风现象,亮度调节也相当不错。拍摄出来的影片清晰度不错,但光线要充足,否则会有很多噪点。
前置自拍摄像头采用 800 万像素传感器。在光线充足的情况下,照片效果相当不错。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light

显示屏 - 低分辨率屏幕
遗憾的是,诺基亚 G42 只有 720p 屏幕,在亮度方面也被同价位的其他设备超越。排在前面的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G,它甚至采用了 AMOLED 屏幕。
我们看到显示屏的偏蓝现象比较严重,导致色彩还原失真,照片看起来比较冷。此外,黑色值相当高,对比度也很一般。
至少,我们在低亮度时没有发现恼人的 PWM 闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 495 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.325
Nokia G42 IPS, 1612x720, 6.56 | Motorola Moto G53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -41% | -12% | 96% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.5 ? | 56 ? -58% | 46.48 ? -31% | 1.35 ? 96% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.7 ? | 26.6 ? -23% | 20.21 ? 7% | 1 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 343 | |||
Screen | 32% | -10% | 53% | |
Brightness middle | 495 | 587 19% | 579 17% | 658 33% |
Brightness | 452 | 559 24% | 543 20% | 663 47% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 91 8% | 87 4% | 98 17% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.57 -14% | |
Contrast | 990 | 1468 48% | 1016 3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 2.6 57% | 7.6 -25% | 1.4 77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.35 | 5.62 40% | 12.7 -36% | 2.7 71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 3.3 43% | 8.7 -50% | 1.7 71% |
Gamma | 2.325 95% | 2.463 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 8169 80% | 6288 103% | 9344 70% | 6504 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
18% | -11% /
-11% | 75% /
63% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 10.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise | |
↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 电量充足
骁龙 480 Plus 5G 骁龙 480 Plus 5G骁龙 480 Plus 5G 是 2021 年的产品,虽然已经有些年头,但其性能仍然足以保证系统的流畅运行,而且还能胜任照片编辑等要求较高的任务。虽然诺基亚智能手机使用了高性能的 UFS 2.2 存储,但存储控制器无法充分利用存储可能达到的速度。因此,它的传输速率只能达到同级水平,在数据传输和加载过程中偶尔会出现等待时间。
在较长时间的负载情况下,手机会明显发热,最高温度可达 43.1 °C,但温度上升并不严重。长期测试也证明了这一点,同样的基准测试运行 20 次后,手机的性能与之相差无几。
诺基亚 G42 底部边缘的扬声器在音质方面并不出众,整体听起来有点闷。再次按下音量增大键可以激活 "音频增强 "功能,此时声音会变得更加清晰,但高音也会非常重,甚至有点大。如果您喜欢连接耳机或扬声器,可以找到一个插孔和蓝牙 5.1 接口。在无线音频传输编解码方面,有最重要的标准可供选择:SBC、AAC、LDAC 和一些 aptX 编解码器。
在我们的 WLAN 测试中,诺基亚 G42 5G 的 5,000 毫安时电池可支持 15:33 小时的正常运行。这个价位的手机续航时间要长得多,但这款手机在日常使用中的表现一般都不错,通常可以陪伴你度过一天而无需停止充电。
诺基亚 G42 5G 的充电功率可达 20 瓦,但包装内没有充电器。在电池完全耗尽的情况下,电池电量指示灯恢复到 100%需要 2 个多小时。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (540 - 558, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (1632 - 1661, n=3) | |
Nokia G42 | |
Motorola Moto G53 |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Nokia G42 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7244, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Nokia G42 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 19783, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Nokia G42 | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (9527 - 10492, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Nokia G42 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (19795 - 20938, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G |
Nokia G42 | Motorola Moto G53 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | 27% | 2% | 18% | 82% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 492.5 | 474.6 -4% | 849.3 72% | 520.09 6% | 707 ? 44% | 1284 ? 161% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 461.8 | 243.87 -47% | 469.83 2% | 505.55 9% | 516 ? 12% | 902 ? 95% |
Random Read 4KB | 183.3 | 166.24 -9% | 193.63 6% | 170.61 -7% | 186.9 ? 2% | 225 ? 23% |
Random Write 4KB | 161.1 | 139.83 -13% | 204 27% | 161.26 0% | 179.9 ? 12% | 239 ? 48% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nokia G42 | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Nokia G42 | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G |
发言人
Nokia G42 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Motorola Moto G53 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
Nokia G42 | |
Average of class Smartphone (424 - 1502, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G |
Pros
Cons
结论--需要权衡利弊
诺基亚 G42 确实有一些特别之处:除了大胆的颜色选择之外,该机对于修理工来说相对容易维修,采用了部分可回收材料,而且尽管价格低廉,制造商仍承诺提供更新服务。遗憾的是,诺基亚 G42 目前还不能作为循环套餐的一部分从诺基亚租用。
诺基亚 G42 的处理器速度够快,屏幕足以满足日常使用需求,相机也能拍出不错的照片。不过,诺基亚 G42 5G 在这些方面都无法在同类手机中脱颖而出。电池续航时间和无线局域网速度也是平庸而非领先。
对于日常使用来说,诺基亚 G42 是一款廉价而可靠的伴侣,它应该可以长期更新,而且由于其相对容易维修,还可以持续使用。
在功能方面更有亮点的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G配备 AMOLED 显示屏,但可持续发展方面的优势在这里往往要退居其次。另一款同价位的快速移动通信手机是 三星Galaxy A14 5G.
价格和供应情况
在美国,用户可以通过亚马逊订购这款手机,价格约为 335 美元。
Nokia G42
-
08/09/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.