Notebookcheck Logo

诺基亚 G42 5G 智能手机评测--这款引人注目的手机甚至可以更换电池

修好我 诺基亚的 G42 应要求采用了大胆的紫色配色,据称易于维修,并以低廉的价格提供了 5G 连接,给人带来了惊喜。诺基亚是以回收材料和更新承诺为重要动力,还是只是众多智能手机中的一款?
5G Android ARM Smartphone
诺基亚 G42
Nokia G42 (G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.56 inch 20:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n28/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 165 x 75.8
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP52-certified
Weight
194 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.3 %
08/2023
Nokia G42
SD 480+, Adreno 619
194 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
79.1 %
03/2023
Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
79.4 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
202 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.7 %
06/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 需要时非常醒目

当然,你可以选择诺基亚 G42 的 "So Grey "配色版本,这样你就可以得到一款设计相当经典的手机,圆角设计,塑料背壳也含有可回收材料,显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 3 保护。然而,只有选择了紫色的 "So Purple "版本,这款手机才会变得真正令人兴奋:这时,小颗粒会闪闪发光,光反射会在背面闪烁,相机模块的颜色也会与紫色设计相适应。

无论如何,这款 194 克重的手机拿在手上非常舒适,而且无法扭动。不过,你可以把后盖往中间按一点,压力也会传到屏幕的液晶上。诺基亚手机采用无塑料包装,并与 iFixit 合作提供https://store.ifixit.de/collections/nokia-parts相对便宜的替换零件,以及更换电池、屏幕或后盖的说明。这并不是什么巫术,但也不容易到外行都敢做的地步。

手机配备了 NFC 功能,因此可以顺利使用移动支付服务。还可以使用 FM 收音机,这在没有网络连接或不想耗费数据量时非常方便。不过,包装中并没有提供合适的耳机作为天线替代品。

诺基亚 G42 是一款双 SIM 卡手机,但其中一个 SIM 卡插槽也可用作 microSD 插槽,因此您必须决定使用哪个插槽。如果使用 microSD,那么在我们的测试中,该读卡器在与参考 microSD Angelbird V60 的复制测试中被证明有点慢,但在 CPDT 基准测试中再次取得了不错的成绩,因此总体速度适中是意料之中的。

诺基亚 G42
诺基亚 G42
诺基亚 G42
诺基亚 G42
诺基亚 G42
诺基亚 G42

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 202 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 189 g165 mm 75.8 mm 8.6 mm 194 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 183 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50.48 MB/s +136%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.4 - 77, n=88, last 2 years)
28.9 MB/s +35%
Motorola Moto G53
  (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s +8%
Nokia G42
  (Angelbird V60)
21.4 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø44.4 (30-53.7)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.9 (28.3-49.6)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Nokia G42 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.8 (25.5-84.7)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (26.1-84.4)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)

通信、软件和操作 - 船上的现代移动通信

诺基亚 G42 是一款 5G 智能手机,因此您也可以使用最快的移动标准。这款手机提供足够的 LTE 和 5G 频率,可以在国外使用,但您应该事先确认是否可以在现场使用手机上网。在我们的测试阶段,接收强度处于较高水平。

WiFi 5 集成了最快的 WLAN 标准。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中,诺基亚 G42 的传输速率非常稳定,在 317 - 380 Mbps 的标准范围内。虽然千兆线路无法充分利用,但对于快速加载和下载页面仍然足够。

Android 诺基亚 G42 ex-works 上安装了 13 个未作更改的界面,但制造商添加了一些第三方应用程序,例如来自购物门户网站的应用程序。这些应用可以顺利卸载。在测试时,安全更新是从 2023 年 6 月开始的,因此仍然相当及时。制造商承诺,自上市起,3 年内都会进行安全更新,直至 2026 年。操作系统也应该会有两个主要版本,因此手机也应该会收到 15。Android

触摸屏使用起来非常顺手,由于采用了 90 Hz 显示屏,操作看起来更加流畅。外壳右侧是待机键,同时也是指纹传感器。通过它可以对手机进行生物解锁。只需进行一次教导,就能非常可靠地进行解锁,但诺基亚 G42 在解锁屏幕之前偶尔会有短暂的延迟。人脸识别也可以使用。这种方法也能可靠地工作,但由于识别的是二维图像,因此不太安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (349min - 374max) MBit/s 0%
Nokia G42
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (340min - 380max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G53
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (319min - 374max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (361min - 371max) MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (336min - 351max) MBit/s +3%
Motorola Moto G53
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
345 (317min - 350max) MBit/s +3%
Nokia G42
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
336 (310min - 344max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Nokia G42; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (310-344)
Nokia G42; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (340-380)

相机 - 照片清晰度高

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

背面有三个相机镜头。200 万像素的微距镜头主要用于抓拍,只能在相机软件的特殊模式下使用。深度摄像头只能为人像模糊效果提供额外信息,不能拍摄自己的照片。剩下的主摄像头像素为 5000 万,采用常见的三星 Isocell JN1 传感器。

诺基亚 5G 手机拍摄的照片清晰度不错,但你很快就会发现,雨天的动态范围很小。在更高质量的相机中,细节多样性也更高。在弱光环境下,亮部和暗部都会丢失很多细节,但照明区域的质量还不错。主摄像头在实验室中表现出色,边缘几乎没有锐度损失。

视频可以 1080p 格式录制,最高 30 fps。自动对焦工作迅速,没有抽风现象,亮度调节也相当不错。拍摄出来的影片清晰度不错,但光线要充足,否则会有很多噪点。

前置自拍摄像头采用 800 万像素传感器。在光线充足的情况下,照片效果相当不错。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G42: 5.88 ∆E min: 1.85 - max: 12.54 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
35 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
48 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
52 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
22 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G42: 37.2 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 52.84 ∆E

显示屏 - 低分辨率屏幕

子像素结构
子像素结构

遗憾的是,诺基亚 G42 只有 720p 屏幕,在亮度方面也被同价位的其他设备超越。排在前面的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G,它甚至采用了 AMOLED 屏幕。

我们看到显示屏的偏蓝现象比较严重,导致色彩还原失真,照片看起来比较冷。此外,黑色值相当高,对比度也很一般。

至少,我们在低亮度时没有发现恼人的 PWM 闪烁。

461
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 495 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 451.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 495 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.325
Nokia G42
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Response Times
-41%
-12%
96%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.5 ?(18.6, 16.9)
56 ?(32, 24)
-58%
46.48 ?(20.16, 26.32)
-31%
1.35 ?(0.691, 0.658)
96%
Response Time Black / White *
21.7 ?(11, 10.7)
26.6 ?(12.6, 14)
-23%
20.21 ?(5.638, 14.57)
7%
1 ?(0.523, 0.475)
95%
PWM Frequency
343
Screen
32%
-10%
53%
Brightness middle
495
587
19%
579
17%
658
33%
Brightness
452
559
24%
543
20%
663
47%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
87
4%
98
17%
Black Level *
0.5
0.4
20%
0.57
-14%
Contrast
990
1468
48%
1016
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.09
2.6
57%
7.6
-25%
1.4
77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.35
5.62
40%
12.7
-36%
2.7
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
3.3
43%
8.7
-50%
1.7
71%
Gamma
2.325 95%
2.463 89%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
8169 80%
6288 103%
9344 70%
6504 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / 18%
-11% / -11%
75% / 63%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 10.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.6 ms rise
↘ 16.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 电量充足

骁龙 480 Plus 5G 骁龙 480 Plus 5G骁龙 480 Plus 5G 是 2021 年的产品,虽然已经有些年头,但其性能仍然足以保证系统的流畅运行,而且还能胜任照片编辑等要求较高的任务。虽然诺基亚智能手机使用了高性能的 UFS 2.2 存储,但存储控制器无法充分利用存储可能达到的速度。因此,它的传输速率只能达到同级水平,在数据传输和加载过程中偶尔会出现等待时间。

在较长时间的负载情况下,手机会明显发热,最高温度可达 43.1 °C,但温度上升并不严重。长期测试也证明了这一点,同样的基准测试运行 20 次后,手机的性能与之相差无几。

诺基亚 G42 底部边缘的扬声器在音质方面并不出众,整体听起来有点闷。再次按下音量增大键可以激活 "音频增强 "功能,此时声音会变得更加清晰,但高音也会非常重,甚至有点大。如果您喜欢连接耳机或扬声器,可以找到一个插孔和蓝牙 5.1 接口。在无线音频传输编解码方面,有最重要的标准可供选择:SBC、AAC、LDAC 和一些 aptX 编解码器。

在我们的 WLAN 测试中,诺基亚 G42 5G 的 5,000 毫安时电池可支持 15:33 小时的正常运行。这个价位的手机续航时间要长得多,但这款手机在日常使用中的表现一般都不错,通常可以陪伴你度过一天而无需停止充电。

诺基亚 G42 5G 的充电功率可达 20 瓦,但包装内没有充电器。在电池完全耗尽的情况下,电池电量指示灯恢复到 100%需要 2 个多小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=202, last 2 years)
919 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
558 Points +1%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
554 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (540 - 558, n=3)
551 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
525 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=202, last 2 years)
3043 Points +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1700 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (1632 - 1661, n=3)
1645 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1643 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1632 Points -1%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=117, last 2 years)
1357 Points +82%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
746 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  ()
746 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=117, last 2 years)
3767 Points +97%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1917 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  ()
1917 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=201, last 2 years)
11960 Points +14%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10492 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10093 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (9527 - 10492, n=3)
10037 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8038 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=94, last 2 years)
2719 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2511 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
2505 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2477 - 2511, n=3)
2493 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2492 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2438 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=94, last 2 years)
2713 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
2382 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2363 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2306 - 2363, n=3)
2328 Points +1%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2316 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2282 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3391 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3208 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=94, last 2 years)
3143 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3057 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2398 - 3391, n=3)
3045 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2398 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=172, last 2 years)
7014 Points +169%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
2709 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2638 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2596 - 2638, n=3)
2613 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2546 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=171, last 2 years)
10140 Points +314%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
2590 Points +6%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2412 - 2448, n=3)
2435 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2412 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2347 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=171, last 2 years)
4342 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3618 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3387 Points +1%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3359 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (3311 - 3387, n=3)
3352 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3231 Points -4%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 13896, n=125, last 2 years)
2682 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1191 Points +21%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
984 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
982 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (981 - 984, n=3)
982 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=191, last 2 years)
6568 Points +577%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1139 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
973 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (970 - 974, n=3)
972 Points 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
970 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=194, last 2 years)
1766 Points +501%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
324 Points +10%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
294 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
293 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (293 - 294, n=3)
293 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=190, last 2 years)
1770 Points +515%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
310 Points +8%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
288 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (286 - 288, n=3)
287 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=214, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +51%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
31 fps +3%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
30 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (15 - 31, n=3)
25.3 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
12 fps -60%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=214, last 2 years)
66.3 fps +268%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps +11%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (18 - 18, n=3)
18 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps -22%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=214, last 2 years)
33.5 fps +76%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps +5%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (9.8 - 20, n=3)
16.3 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7.9 fps -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=214, last 2 years)
26.6 fps +309%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8.9 fps +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (6.5 - 8.9, n=3)
7.3 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7.1 fps +9%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.3 fps -18%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=210, last 2 years)
12.7 fps +338%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3.1 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2.9 fps 0%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2.9 - 2.9, n=2)
2.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=208, last 2 years)
33762 Points +63%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20938 Points +1%
Nokia G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20689 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (19795 - 20938, n=3)
20474 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
19867 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15352 Points -26%
Nokia G42Motorola Moto G53Samsung Galaxy A14 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
27%
2%
18%
119%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.5
474.6
-4%
849.3
72%
520.09
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
461.8
243.87
-47%
469.83
2%
505.55
9%
Random Read 4KB
183.3
166.24
-9%
193.63
6%
170.61
-7%
Random Write 4KB
161.1
139.83
-13%
204
27%
161.26
0%
181.1 ?(62.6 - 419, n=64)
12%

温度

Max. Load
 43.1 °C34.7 °C30.9 °C 
 41.6 °C34.8 °C31 °C 
 40.7 °C34.4 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
30 °C35.2 °C42.6 °C
31 °C36.1 °C42.9 °C
32 °C36.3 °C42.3 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图背面
热图背面
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia G42
99.5 (1.744min - 1.754max) %
Motorola Moto G53
98.8 (1.744min - 1.766max) % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
98.4 (1.957min - 1.988max) % -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
% -100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
99.5 (7.18min - 7.21max) % 0%
Nokia G42
99.4 (5.86min - 5.9max) %
Motorola Moto G53
96.9 (5.72min - 5.9max) % -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
% -100%

Legend

 
Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.138.82537.538.73131.4294033.335.25032.133.26326.1318020.227.710016.127.812514.930.11601338.42009.538.925010.541.131511.9444008.150.6500956.563010.26280013.965.9100012.269.1125011.870.4160011.466.1200010.664.8250011.367.131501270.2400012.767.9500013.463.3630014.158.2800014.8591000015.758.51250016.454.71600017.352.6SPL24.978.5N0.639.6median 12.2median 58.5Delta1.911.130.734.720.835.31931.217.134.233.440.120.940.116.638.720.541.416.54214.742.21445.414.349.213.154.613.660.313.267.312.370.212.572.211.979.312.678.812.979.113.379.612.578.813.480.513.98313.983.113.580.713.776.313.977.713.576.413.761.825.391.50.787.4median 13.5median 76.40.79.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia G42Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia G42 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
1035 min +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
1029 min +10%
Nokia G42
5000 mAh
933 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 2844, n=215, last 2 years)
930 min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
645 min -31%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 33min

Pros

+ 纯净Android
+ 更新承诺
+ 维修相对容易
+ 可靠的指纹传感器
+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 显示屏明显偏蓝
- 无广角摄像头
- 背部部分凹陷
- 内存稍慢

结论--需要权衡利弊

评论中:诺基亚 G42。测试设备由以下公司提供
评论中:诺基亚 G42。测试设备由以下公司提供
cyberport.com

诺基亚 G42 确实有一些特别之处:除了大胆的颜色选择之外,该机对于修理工来说相对容易维修,采用了部分可回收材料,而且尽管价格低廉,制造商仍承诺提供更新服务。遗憾的是,诺基亚 G42 目前还不能作为循环套餐的一部分从诺基亚租用。

诺基亚 G42 的处理器速度够快,屏幕足以满足日常使用需求,相机也能拍出不错的照片。不过,诺基亚 G42 5G 在这些方面都无法在同类手机中脱颖而出。电池续航时间和无线局域网速度也是平庸而非领先。

对于日常使用来说,诺基亚 G42 是一款廉价而可靠的伴侣,它应该可以长期更新,而且由于其相对容易维修,还可以持续使用。

在功能方面更有亮点的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G配备 AMOLED 显示屏,但可持续发展方面的优势在这里往往要退居其次。另一款同价位的快速移动通信手机是 三星Galaxy A14 5G.

价格和供应情况

在美国,用户可以通过亚马逊订购这款手机,价格约为 335 美元

Nokia G42 - 08/09/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
20 / 64 → 31%
Application Performance
64 / 86 → 74%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
59%
Average
73%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚 G42 5G 智能手机评测--这款引人注目的手机甚至可以更换电池
Florian Schmitt, 2023-08-11 (Update: 2023-08-11)