Notebookcheck Logo

微星 Cubi NUC 2MG 扬声器较弱,需要升级

微星 NUC 2MG 的集成扬声器在纸面上非常出色,但在实际使用中,其音量对于许多环境来说都太小了(图片来源:Notebookcheck)
微星 NUC 2MG 的集成扬声器在纸面上非常出色,但在实际使用中,其音量对于许多环境来说都太小了(图片来源:Notebookcheck)
迷你 PC 上的扬声器不需要有最好的低音水平或平衡,但至少要足够响亮,以充斥会议室或繁忙的零售环境。微星 Cubi 2MG 的新集成扬声器在这方面显得过于柔和。
Mini PC Lunar Lake Review Snippet MSI

作为一款面向商务的 NUC,微星 Cubi 2MG 集成了一些可能对零售或商务环境有用的功能,包括专用的 Co-Pilot 按钮、有线电源按钮、数字麦克风和单声道扬声器。当然,我们并不指望集成扬声器能产生令人惊叹的低音效果,但其较低的最大音量确实令人失望。

正如我们对微星 Cubi 2MG 的评测和下面的粉红噪声图所示,微星的扬声器最大音量仅为 70 dB(A),而其他迷你 PC 的最大音量分别为 78 dB(A)、81 dB(A) 和 76 dB(A),如 Beelink SER9 Pro, 博弈 M2HP Z2 Mini和 HP Z2 Mini。虽然差别可能只有几个分贝,但它们确实很明显,尤其是当你考虑到分贝标度是对数时。主观而言,微星扬声器的音量不足以让中小型会议室充满音效,尽管它是专为此类专业场景设计的。

2024 Cubi 1M 相比,2025 Cubi 2MG 所取代的 Cubi 1M 还是有所改进的,因为 Cubi 1M 完全没有扬声器。我们希望假想中的第三代型号能配备更大、更响亮的扬声器。

更多信息请参阅我们的 微星 Cubi 2MG 的评测,点击此处.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.532.331.5252230.2223122.928.922.9402128.8215024.630.424.6632529.6258025.529.925.510024.627.824.612530.431.130.416042.422.442.420049.52249.52505122.55131552.122.252.140057.924.157.950066.12766.163066.128.366.18006125.261100048.924.148.9125057.328.457.3160054.72754.7200050.324.750.325005021.950315055.223.955.2400056.619.956.6500055.618.455.6630062.114.962.1800057.914.757.9100005113.2511250043.113.143.11600033.814.833.8SPL70.536.170.5N27.52.327.5median 52.1median 22.5median 52.1Delta6.956.933.533.433.525.326.625.324.621.924.621.620.721.623.723.123.722.621.122.62522.82527.820.727.836.319.536.346.418.946.450.719.750.753.719.553.756.919.756.965.921.365.972.221.872.275.121.675.172.42172.460.218.960.261.22361.263.822.463.857.517.757.561.918.261.967.216.767.260.613.660.65512.55560.111.760.158.21258.258125861.311.961.350.711.350.778.23178.241.31.341.3median 60.1median 18.9median 60.15.83.65.829.234.829.224.426.924.42022.92020.12020.126.222.726.233.320.433.340.92040.944.419.544.446.219.946.250.814.950.852.514.952.55715.75759.417.759.465.617.365.667.812.967.872.514.272.572.618.172.672.513.372.571.613.871.670.613.270.670.51270.568.61368.668.511.668.567.312.967.365.31265.364.312.264.362.312.362.358.512.458.552.212.252.238.412.138.481.225.881.250.90.750.9median 65.3median 13.2median 65.38.61.88.643.542.643.538.240.138.236.840.836.83129.63134.632.534.631.930.631.924.621.524.62419.3242516.52524.714.524.72316.12326.610.326.625.811.825.828.910.328.941.4941.451.18.851.155.69.555.6559.65555.110.455.156.110.856.161.711.961.760.812.460.86413.26462.813.862.864.214.164.272.314.672.367.914.867.964.71564.759.314.859.346.314.446.376.324.976.331.20.631.2median 55.1median 13.2median 55.115.22.215.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MGBeelink SER9 ProBOSGAME M2HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (19.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Beelink SER9 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

BOSGAME M2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 新闻 > 新闻档案 > 新闻档案 2025 10 > 微星 Cubi NUC 2MG 扬声器较弱,需要升级
Allen Ngo, 2025-10- 2 (Update: 2025-10- 2)