作为一款面向商务的 NUC,微星 Cubi 2MG 集成了一些可能对零售或商务环境有用的功能,包括专用的 Co-Pilot 按钮、有线电源按钮、数字麦克风和单声道扬声器。当然,我们并不指望集成扬声器能产生令人惊叹的低音效果,但其较低的最大音量确实令人失望。
正如我们对微星 Cubi 2MG 的评测和下面的粉红噪声图所示,微星的扬声器最大音量仅为 70 dB(A),而其他迷你 PC 的最大音量分别为 78 dB(A)、81 dB(A) 和 76 dB(A),如 Beelink SER9 Pro, 博弈 M2和 HP Z2 Mini和 HP Z2 Mini。虽然差别可能只有几个分贝,但它们确实很明显,尤其是当你考虑到分贝标度是对数时。主观而言,微星扬声器的音量不足以让中小型会议室充满音效,尽管它是专为此类专业场景设计的。
与 2024 Cubi 1M 相比,2025 Cubi 2MG 所取代的 Cubi 1M 还是有所改进的,因为 Cubi 1M 完全没有扬声器。我们希望假想中的第三代型号能配备更大、更响亮的扬声器。
更多信息请参阅我们的 微星 Cubi 2MG 的评测,点击此处.
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (19.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Beelink SER9 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
BOSGAME M2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名