Notebookcheck Logo
Apple iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16 智能手机评测--创新超乎想象

新版本。

更大的电池、更大的内存、新的相机按键、更鲜艳的色彩和更强劲的动力:按照Apple 的标准,iPhone 16 拥有超过平均水平的新功能,使其成为市场上最好的紧凑型智能手机之一。我们的评测揭示了它是否值得购买或升级。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 - 专业型与非专业型仍有严格区分

对于 iPhone 16,Apple ,它可能不会重新发明轮子。不过,与上一代产品相比,它还是在最新版智能手机中加入了大量更新。剩下的都是加分项,如非常优质的制造质量、强大的摄像头、明亮的 OLED 面板和较长的更新周期。

手机 Apple A18使 iPhone 16 的性能明显强于 iPhone 15用户将受益于内存升级到 8 GB,尽管这与备受赞誉的人工智能功能毫无关系。WiFi 7 现在也已进入 "基本 "版 iPhone,不过与 Pro 机型一样,它的带宽仅限于 160 MHz。在日常使用中,增大 6% 的电池容量可确保稍好的电池续航时间。

有了 "动作 "按钮,iPhone 16 不仅继承了过去 Pro 机型才有的功能,而且还取代了经典的摇杆。另一项创新是控制相机的触觉拍照按钮。至于它是否真的有用,那就是另一个问题了。

iPhone 15 上备受诟病的一项功能被延续到了 iPhone 16 上,这也是我们批评的重点之一。虽然这款智能手机的价格几乎达到了四位数,但 OLED 屏幕的运行频率仍然是最新的 60 Hz。此外,你还得忍受没有永远在线显示屏的烦恼。此外,你只能获得 12 个月的保修,它仍然使用缓慢的 USB-C 2.0,充电速度也不是特别快。

iPhone 16 的替代产品之一是 iPhone 15,它现在的价格要便宜得多,功能也非常相似。Android 方面的一个推荐是 6.2 英寸的 三星Galaxy S24和 6.36 英寸的类似小巧的 小米 14.

Pros

+ 优质外壳,通过 IP68 认证
+ 明亮、色彩准确的 oled 显示屏
+ WiFi 7
+ 超宽带、线程网络和双 eSIM 卡
+ 世界电话
+ 精确定位
+ 极高性能超长电池寿命
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 长时间更新

Cons

- 刷新率仅为 60 赫兹
- WiFi 7 最大带宽为 160 MHz
- 蓝牙音频编解码器仅为 AAC
- 只有 USB 2.0
- 保修期仅为 12 个月
- 充电速度相对较慢

价格和供应情况

如果从购买 iPhone 16,起价为 799 美元。Apple我们的 512 GB 评测机型售价 1,099 美元。

Amazon Logo
$22.00
Apple iPhone 16 Silicone Case with MagSafe and Camera Control - Black ​​​​​​​
  • $22.49
    Wireless Charger iPhone Charging Station: 3 in 1 Charger Stand Multiple Devices for Apple - iPhone 16 15 14 Pro Max 13 12 11 - Watch 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 SE and Ultra Series - Airpods 4 3 2 Pro
  • $25.99
    3 in 1 Charging Station for iPhone, Wireless Charger for iPhone 16 15 14 13 12 11 X Pro Max & Apple Watch - Wireless Charging Station for AirPods 4 3 Pro

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

今年的 9 月 7 日对于Apple 的果粉来说是个重要的日子,因为这一天美国制造商发布了最新一代的 iPhone。在对 iPhone 16 Pro,以及 iPhone 16 Pro MaxiPhone 16 Plus现在轮到 iPhone 16 了。

这款最小的新 iPhone 机型的价格与iPhone 15 的价格完全相同。起售价与一年前相同--并不便宜的 799 美元。作为回报,这款配备Apple A18 的 6.1 英寸手机在性能方面实现了飞跃。它配备了一个新的相机按钮,现在可以使用 8 GB 内存,而不是以前的 6 GB。它的电池容量增加了 6%,现在还支持 WiFi 7。

Apple iPhone 16 (iPhone 16 Series)
Processor
Apple A18 6 x - 3.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2556 x 1179 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super Retina XDR OLED, 1600/2000 nits max. brightness (HDR/outdoor), 1 nit min. brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple 512GB NVMe, 512 GB 
, 496 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (850/900/1700/1900/2100 MHz), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/48/53/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/26/28/30/38/40/41/48/53/66/70/75/76/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 147.6 x 71.6
Battery
0 Wh, 3561 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 18
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix fusion camera (26 mm, f/1.6, OIS), 12 MP ultrawide camera (13 mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV); video recording up to 4k@600fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (23 mm, f/1.9, AF), video recording up to 4k@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-eSIM-Support, fanless, waterproof
Weight
170 g
Price
1329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护壳 - iPhone 16 的大胆色彩

除了后置摄像头的布局外,Apple 还采用了 iPhone 15 的iPhone 16 的设计,或多或少地采用了 1:1 的比例。不过,与前代产品不同的是,iPhone 16 首日推出的颜色更加大胆。我们的评测机是茶色,其他颜色有群青、粉色、白色和黑色。

iPhone 16 还采用了时尚的一体式机身外壳,做工精良,手感极佳,而且在我们的测试中,我们试图将其撞凹或扭转,它都表现得异常坚固耐用。机身防尘防水等级达到 IP68。

iPhone 16 采用铝合金边框,后部是磨砂纯色玻璃,除了中间的Apple 徽标外,几乎不会沾染指纹。正面再次使用了 Ceramic Shield 屏幕保护技术。不过,据称其坚固程度比 iPhone 15 要高出 50%。

前代产品的主摄像头和超广角摄像头偏向一侧,而现在它们直接位于彼此的顶部,与 iPhone 16 和 iPhone 16 Plus 相同。 iPhone 16 Plus 一样。.这也意味着这两款设备现在都可以拍摄三维视频。这在 iPhone 或 iPhone 15 Plus由于两个摄像头的对角线位置,这一点在 iPhone 或 iPhone 15 Plus 上都无法实现。

尺寸方面没有任何变化。iPhone 16 的尺寸与 iPhone 15 完全相同,重量却减轻了 1 克。这在日常使用中可能并不明显。

Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16

尺寸比较

154 mm 68 mm 8.6 mm 182 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g147.6 mm 71.6 mm 7.8 mm 170 g147.6 mm 71.6 mm 7.8 mm 171 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Apple iPhone 16 拥有 8GB 内存

为了确保Apple 的新人工智能功能也能在 "最小 "的新款 iPhone 上运行,iPhone 16 配备了 8GB 内存(约合 1.5GB)。iPhone 15:6GB)。不过,从价格上看,与 iPhone 15 相比没有任何变化。可用存储空间也相同:

  • 128 GB 大容量存储:799 美元
  • 256 GB 大容量存储:899 美元
  • 512 GB 大容量存储:1,099 美元

iPhone 16 ProiPhone 16 Pro Max 不同,iPhone 16 的 USB-C 端口在内部使用 USB 2.0 速度连接,而不是 USB 3.2。这使得数据传输速度大大降低,我们使用测试固态硬盘三星 980 Pro(38.9 MB/s)进行的拷贝测试也证实了这一点。

USB-C 端口使用 DisplayPort 协议,这意味着你可以在显示器上镜像 iPhone 的屏幕。要实现这一功能,你还需要一条 USB-C 连接线(USB 3.1 或更高版本)和一个合适的外接显示器。

除了蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC 芯片(仅在读取模式下可用)外,iPhone 16 还配备了超宽带芯片。新增加的功能之一是支持智能家居无线标准 Thread。

在欧洲,Apple 继续为 iPhone 16 提供 nano-SIM 卡插槽。与 eSIM 卡一起使用,可以实现双卡双待。另外,2 个 eSIM 卡也可以使用。

左:操作按钮、音量按钮、nano-SIM 卡
左:操作按钮、音量按钮、nano-SIM 卡
右:触觉拍照按钮、待机按钮
右:触觉拍照按钮、待机按钮
顶部:无端口
顶部:无端口
底部麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

软件 -Apple iPhone 16,搭载 iOS 18,最初没有人工智能功能

iPhone 16 运行全新的 iOS 18。除了全新设计的照片 app 等小改动外,控制中心的可定制性大大增强,并摒弃了死板的 app 网格。现在,应用程序可以放置在主屏幕的任何位置。然而,最重要的是,人工智能功能让新操作系统与 iOS 17 区别开来。

我们已经在以下文章中介绍了人工智能功能(又称Apple Intelligence)。 iPhone 16 Plus评测中介绍过。这些功能包括人工智能生成的表情符号、照片编辑、语音信息转录、网站和其他基于文本的内容,以及更智能的 Siri 语音助手。

不过,由于《数字市场法》(DMA)的数据保护规定,Apple iPhone 智能系统最初不会在欧盟市场上推出。Apple 希望在与欧盟委员会达成协议后尽快赶上,但这可能不会在 2025 年前实现。

Apple 关于 iPhone 16 将在多长时间内获得更新,苹果公司尚未提供任何信息。不过,经验表明,iPhone 16 的更新周期为 5 年。此外,如果需要弥补关键的安全漏洞,旧设备仍会收到更新。

Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16

可持续性

据Apple 报道,iPhone 16 有超过 30% 的材料是回收材料。在金、钴、锂和稀土方面,回收配额甚至达到了 100%。

包装不含任何塑料,100% 由木质纤维组成,这些纤维也都是回收的或来自负责任的森林种植。Apple 在这份报告中提供了的精确信息。.

过去,iPhone 并不以易于维修而闻名。不过,现在这种情况已经大为改观,因为目前的 iPhone 采用了模块化内部设计,可以从两侧打开。此外,iOS 集成的维修助手有助于避免更换部件后出现软件错误。

有经验的用户可以自己修理 iPhone。虽然需要专用工具,但Apple 还提供了详细的维修手册支持。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7,开启手持设备

在 Wi-Fi 网速方面,iPhone 16 与其他所有 iPhone 16 机型不相上下。凭借 WiFi 7 和 2x2 MIMO,它提供了目前最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,还可以接入 6 GHz 频段。

尽管如此,Apple ,由于该智能手机的 WiFi 7 功能带宽仅限于 160 MHz,因此也设置了隐藏的制动器。这就把 Wi-Fi 的速度限制在 WiFi 6E 的水平。不过,与华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器连接后,iPhone 16 的表现还是不错的。它能提供稳定的传输速度,在 6 GHz 频段的峰值为 1,401 MBit/s。

iPhone 16 可以接入多个频段,因此可以在全球范围内轻松使用。对于 5G 和 4G 连接,它使用 4x4 MIMO,即同时在四个发送和接收信道上进行传输。

Networking
Apple iPhone 16
iperf3 receive AXE11000
776 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 1319) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 1214) MBit/s ∼68%
Apple iPhone 15
iperf3 receive AXE11000
691 (min: 617) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
773 (min: 576) MBit/s ∼45%
Google Pixel 9
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼53%
Sony Xperia 5 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18, Apple A18 GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1402 (1319-1418)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18, Apple A18 GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1257 (1214-1281)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18, Apple A18 GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø775 (764-786)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø690 (617-720)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18, Apple A18 GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (893-950)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø773 (576-833)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)

iPhone 16 使用卫星导航服务 GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、QZSS 和北斗来确定其位置。在测试中,无论是在室内还是室外,定位精度都在 4 米左右,在小型自行车旅行中也保持了很高的精度。

Apple 智能手机能够追踪约 10 公里长的自行车之旅,其准确度与作为参照设备的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表不相上下。这意味着我们可以毫无保留地推荐 iPhone 16 执行导航任务。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:环湖航行
GPS 测试:环湖航行
GPS 测试:转折点
GPS 测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

iPhone 16 支持 VoLTE 和 WiFi 通话。除了实体 SIM 卡,你还可以激活 eSIM 卡。如果你不想使用 SIM 卡,也可以使用两个 eSIM 卡。

在我们的测试中,iPhone 16 提供了良好的语音质量。使用手机和座机,我们可以完全听清对方的声音,而接收端也报告了同样的清晰度。在免提模式下,这一点基本上没有改变,只是声音小了一些。

如果手边没有移动网络或 WLAN,iPhone 还可以通过卫星连接拨打紧急电话。一旦激活,该服务在未来两年内都是免费的。不过 永久免费Apple ,如果在紧急情况下由于没有激活订阅服务而不得不启动这项救生功能,那将是非常不利的。

摄像头 - 4800 万像素摄像头,2 倍变焦

自拍相机图像
自拍相机图像

iPhone 16 的自拍摄像头分辨率仍为 1200 万像素,拍摄效果不错,具有漂亮的虚化效果。与主摄像头一样,它也能以 4K 和高达每秒 60 帧的速度录制视频,并在此过程中提供非常好的图像质量。

Apple 关于 iPhone 的主摄像头,我们也没有新的消息。它继续使用 4800 万像素分辨率的图像传感器,并允许你以 1200 万像素或 2400 万像素拍摄照片。只要在设置中激活分辨率控制,就可以使用完整的 4800 万像素。

索尼图像传感器还允许 iPhone 的主摄像头以 1200 万像素拍摄长焦照片,相当于 2 倍变焦。使用主摄像头拍摄的照片在光线条件较差的情况下也能保持较高的图像清晰度和均衡的色彩还原。当你使用 2 倍变焦放大图像时,许多细节仍然清晰可见,但在更高的变焦水平下(数码变焦高达 10 倍),图像很快就会变得模糊不清。

主摄像头能以最高 4K 和每秒 60 帧的速度录制视频,其图像质量与照片一样令人印象深刻。视频非常清晰,自动对焦响应精确,可在明亮和昏暗的主体之间轻松切换。如果使用影院模式,相机会自动对人脸对焦,并保存额外的深度信息,以便日后调整焦距,实现模糊效果。

分辨率为 1200 万像素的超广角摄像头采用了全新的传感器,光圈稍宽(f/2.2)。iPhone 15: f/2.4).在其能力范围内,它能很好地完成任务。拍摄的照片清晰、基本无畸变,但细节不多。

主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
超广角相机图像
超广角相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像
主相机图像(2 倍变焦)
主相机图像(2 倍变焦)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image 1Daylight image 2Ultra-wide-angle5x zoomLowlight image
orginal image
click to load images

在实验室中,我们再次观察了主相机在全棚照明和仅 1 勒克斯照明下的表现。在最佳照明条件下,它能准确捕捉色彩,以高水平的细节和对比度再现测试图。

在较差的照明条件下,清晰度有所下降。不过,测试图仍然完全可辨,色彩与目标值的偏差也相对较小。

ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16: 9.58 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 15.14 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16: 8.36 ∆E min: 3.17 - max: 17.82 ∆E

配件和保修 -Apple iPhone 16 提供 12 个月的保修服务

可选配件,从左至右:30 瓦充电器、MagSafe 充电器、硅胶套
可选配件,从左至右:30 瓦充电器、MagSafe 充电器、硅胶套

Apple 随 iPhone 16 附送了一条 USB-C 连接线(USB 2.0)和一个 SIM 卡工具。薄薄的包装内还有几本小册子,上面印有信息资料。Apple 贴纸不再包括以前的 iPhone 机型。

Apple 苹果公司为其智能手机提供了大量附加配件,其中包括 30 瓦充电器(39 美元https://www.apple.com/de/shop/product/MW2G3ZM/A/30w-usb充电器(39 美元)、MagSafe 适配器(39 美元)和 (39 美元)和带有 MagSafe 功能的硅胶保护套($49).

iPhone 16 提供 12 个月的保修服务。通过AppleCare+可延长保修期,起价为每月 9.99 美元或一次性支付 2 年的 199 美元。如果你还希望提供失窃和遗失保障,价格将增至每月 11.49 美元或一次性支付 219 美元。

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 16 有两个新按键

iPhone 16 的系统运行速度非常快,通过 6.1 英寸屏幕进行输入时几乎没有延迟。FaceID 可用于生物识别解锁。这是通过三维人脸识别技术实现的,具有很高的安全性,而且运行非常快速可靠。振动马达可提供精确的反馈。

由于采用 60 Hz 面板,iPhone 16 的屏幕并不是最流畅的。这一点在滚动菜单和网站时尤为明显。 对于使用 90 Hz 或 120 Hz 面板的用户来说,低帧频是最明显的问题。

几年前,Apple ,有传言称可能会出现无按键 iPhone。与 iPhone 15 相比,iPhone 16 配备了两个新按键,可以说是一种反向运动。 iPhone 15.其中一个按键取代了静音开关,成为以前在 iPhone 15 Pro 上看到的熟悉的操作按键。 iPhone 15 Pro& iPhone 15 Pro Max.

右侧的相机按钮也是新设计的,它负责启动相机应用。在相机 app 中,该按键可用作快门,由于其表面具有触摸感应功能,它还可用于调整其他相机设置,如变焦系数、曝光时间、光圈和音量。这两个按钮在 iPhone 16 Pro 机型中也能找到。

键盘肖像
键盘肖像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 明亮的 60 Hz OLED 面板

子像素
子像素

iPhone 16 的 6.1 英寸 OLED 面板主要基于 iPhone 15.它继续提供 2,556 x 1,179 像素,像素密度为 460 PPI。不过,它的一个新特性是,60 Hz 屏幕现在名义上可以暗淡到只有 1 nit。在我们的测试中,我们录得的亮度为 1.64 cd/m²,与制造商的规格相当接近。

Apple OLED 面板的平均亮度为 1,000 尼特,在 HDR 内容中的最大亮度为 1,600 尼特。在测试中,屏幕的亮度更高一些。在纯白背景下,我们测得的亮度为 1,102 cd/m²。如果切换到图像的较小部分(APL20 测量),OLED 面板会产生更高的亮度。如果是 SDR 内容,亮度可达 2,287 cd/m²,如果是 HDR 内容,亮度可达 2,362 cd/m²。

无论我们测量的亮度水平如何,OLED 面板的闪烁频率都很低,仅为 60 Hz。同时,我们测得的次要频率为 487 赫兹。PWM 闪烁非常均匀,这意味着即使是敏感的用户也不会感到困扰。不过,如果有疑问,你应该在购买前亲自试用一下 iPhone 16。

1096
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1105
cd/m²
1106
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
1097
cd/m²
1107
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
1104
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1107 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1101.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.64 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1101 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Apple iPhone 16
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Apple iPhone 15
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Screen
-41%
22%
-90%
-46%
-28%
Brightness middle
1101
1046
-5%
2063
87%
1349
23%
889
-19%
1043
-5%
Brightness
1102
1019
-8%
1914
74%
1369
24%
898
-19%
1052
-5%
Brightness Distribution
99
94
-5%
84
-15%
97
-2%
97
-2%
96
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.4
-56%
0.7
22%
3.3
-267%
1.4
-56%
1.1
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.5
2.84
-89%
2.2
-47%
5
-233%
4.5
-200%
2.8
-87%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.4
-85%
1.2
8%
2.4
-85%
1
23%
1.9
-46%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.158 102%
2.23 99%
1.97 112%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6480 100%
6410 101%
6524 100%
6635 98%
6456 101%
6740 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 25.75 %
Secondary Frequency: 487 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行的一系列测量 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来非常平)。不过,这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中找到最小亮度下振幅的放大图)。

在色彩还原方面,OLED 面板的画质非常出色。如果你需要尽可能自然的色彩,你应该关闭 "真实色调 "功能。使用该功能时,iPhone 会根据环境光线调整屏幕色彩,因此呈现的色彩会略微不准确。

色彩准确度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
色彩准确度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
色彩空间("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
色彩空间("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
灰度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
灰度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
色彩饱和度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)
色彩饱和度("真实色调 "已停用,目标色彩空间为 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.178 ms rise
↘ 1.136 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.426 ms rise
↘ 1.473 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在室外,即使在明亮的环境光线下,屏幕内容依然清晰可辨。必要时,视角稳定的 OLED 面板会将亮度调节到非常高的水平。不过,在亮度传感器关闭的情况下,最高亮度可达 840 cd/m²。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 -Apple iPhone 16 配备 A18 SoC

iPhone 中的计算任务由 Apple 18.这款高端 SoC 依赖于 6 个处理器内核,其中 2 个为性能内核,运行频率高达 4.04 GHz。在 CPU 基准测试中,iPhone 16 不仅大幅领先于 iPhone 15 而且在大多数测试中都名列前茅。只有 小米 14在 TuTu v10 中速度更快。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
3377 Points
Average Apple A18
  (3149 - 3377, n=2)
3263 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2465 Points -27%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -41%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
8362 Points
Average Apple A18
  (7663 - 8362, n=2)
8013 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6019 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -50%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points +21%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1632305 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -1%
Average Apple A18
  (1419444 - 1632305, n=2)
1525875 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1492 Points
Average Apple A18
  (1407 - 1492, n=2)
1450 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1260 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -22%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points -22%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
951 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -38%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
33181 Points
Average Apple A18
  (32966 - 33181, n=2)
33074 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
26368 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -24%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points -96%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -97%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
871 Points -97%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
4352 Points
Average Apple A18
  (4122 - 4352, n=2)
4237 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=40, last 2 years)
778 Points -82%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
771 Points -82%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
317 Points -93%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
277 Points -94%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
32432 Points
Average Apple A18
  (32120 - 32432, n=2)
32276 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4666 Points -86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=40, last 2 years)
3710 Points -89%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
321 Points -99%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
312 Points -99%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
44657 Points
Average Apple A18
  (44381 - 44657, n=2)
44519 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6451 Points -86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=40, last 2 years)
5338 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1058 Points -98%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
669 Points -99%

Apple A18图形芯片,iPhone 16 明显超越了 iPhone 15在 GPU 基准测试中,它的性能与 iPhone 15 不相上下,但在追赶 骁龙 8 代 3.在某些方面,甚至 骁龙 8 代 2也要稍快一些。不过,正如屏幕上的 GFXBench 测试所显示的那样,总体而言,iPhone 16 是一款非常强大的图形解决方案,但其 60 Hz 屏幕往往会阻碍其性能的发挥。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4142 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2411 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4255 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -40%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2409 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
16523 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13993 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12092 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -46%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7453 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3332 Points -55%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7422 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3229 Points -56%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1569 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -35%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1803 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +102%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps +13%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
477 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
333.7 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +102%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
297 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -3%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
185.4 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +102%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
201 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133.4 fps -34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
58.1 fps -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
139 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
89.6 fps -36%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +55%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +45%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +10%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
59.9 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
58.1 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
52.3 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
46.7 fps -11%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +102%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +97%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +67%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps +25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
165 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
112 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -35%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +25%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
25.5 fps
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
19.8 fps -22%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -25%

在网上冲浪时,iPhone 16 是一股不可忽视的力量。没有其他对比设备能达到如此出色的基准测试结果。 同样,iPhone iPhone 15则更靠后。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
280.143 Points
Average Apple A18 (270 - 280, n=2)
275 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
259.7 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -56%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
539 runs/min
Average Apple A18 ()
539 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
327 runs/min -39%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min -50%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min -51%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min -66%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179 runs/min -67%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -73%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
32.4 runs/min
Average Apple A18 (29.9 - 32.4, n=2)
31.2 runs/min -4%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
14.9 runs/min -54%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min -63%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 122)
11.6 runs/min -64%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
263 Points
Average Apple A18 (263 - 263, n=2)
263 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
171 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -55%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
96054 Points
Average Apple A18 (90158 - 96054, n=2)
93106 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
68554 Points -29%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -435%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * -162%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -148%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -133%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * -119%
Apple iPhone 15 (Chrome 117)
506 ms * -78%
Average Apple A18 (285 - 290, n=2)
287 ms * -1%
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
284.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

在日常情况下,iPhone 16 的 NVMe 存储可确保极短的加载时间。不过,由于 iOS 没有可靠的存储基准,因此无法量化其性能。

游戏 - 限制为 60fps 的游戏平台

iPhone 16 的屏幕运行速度高达每秒 60 帧。在许多游戏中,也能达到这一最高帧数。重磅图形游戏《源氏冲击》就是如此,即使选择了最高图形细节。

PUBG Mobile》在高清设置下的运行帧数也接近每秒 60 帧。在超高清设置下,iPhone 16 的帧数会部分降低至 40fps,然后再次跳升至 60fps。尽管如此,游戏过程依然流畅。

我们使用Gamebench测试工具进行游戏基准测试。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø59.3 (46-60)
Apple iPhone 16; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø57.9 (46-60)
Apple iPhone 16; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø58.1 (44-60)
Apple iPhone 16; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø58.9 (47-60)
Apple iPhone 16; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø43.6 (31-60)

排放 - iPhone 16 配备立体声扬声器

温度

在负载情况下,iPhone 16 会变得非常热。在该设备上运行 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 压力测试一小时后,我们记录的表面温度高达 45.3 °C。相比之下,在正常使用情况下,它的温度仍然很低。

3DMark 压力测试表明,在满载情况下,iPhone 16 只能在相对较短的时间内发挥全部性能,然后 SoC 就会因温度原因而受到限制。在某些情况下,性能会下降近三分之一,但即便如此,仍有充足的电力可供使用。

Max. Load
 43.7 °C43.5 °C40.1 °C 
 44.2 °C43.9 °C39.2 °C 
 41.7 °C42.3 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 42 °C
38.5 °C42.6 °C44.3 °C
37.7 °C42 °C45.3 °C
36.9 °C39.5 °C41.7 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
93.3 %
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
76.3 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % -19%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % -27%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % -44%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
84.3 % +23%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +4%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
68.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -17%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.5 %
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % -2%
Apple iPhone 15
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
68.1 % -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -20%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +8%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.4 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.2 (16.7-24.3)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø12 (11.4-13.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Apple iPhone 16 A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.7 (56.1-60.1)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47.9 (44.8-58.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Apple iPhone 16 A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø70.5 (62.9-98.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Apple iPhone 16 A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (16.7-23)
Apple iPhone 15 A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.41 (8.41-12.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Apple iPhone 16 A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.72 (8.96-12.4)
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16

发言人

iPhone 16 的立体声扬声器可营造出相对均衡的音效,尤其是在声音方面。在高音量时,扬声器不会失真,但听起来确实有些刺耳。

你可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 将外置音频设备连接到智能手机。在无线音频传输方面,iPhone 16 只能访问Apple 的 AAC,因此没有一个经过认证的高音质 BT 编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.52526.8363123.632.34022.334.25027.532.86320.539.18020.737.810019.34312515.752.216013.658.320016.257.525015.557.631515.160.140010.963.45009.968.863012.171.980014.173.6100014.276.3125012.977.7160014.277.2200012.778.8250012.780.8315013.582.5400013.180.6500013.178630013.478.3800012.775.91000013.4761250013.472.11600013.157SPL25.490.4N0.784.2median 13.4median 75.9Delta1.17.836.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 16Samsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - iPhone 16 配备更大的电池

耗电量

空闲运行时,iPhone 16 并不像 iPhone 15 那样经济。 iPhone 15.不过,它的能效更高,耗电量明显低于所有同类设备。

iPhone 16 通过 USB-C 接口充电的最大功率为 20 瓦。在测试中,一个完整的充电周期需要 1 小时 36 分钟,53 分钟后电池电量达到 80%。

通过 MagSafe,充电过程的最高功率可达 25 瓦。通过 Qi 无线充电的功率可达 7.5 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.42 / 1.43 Watt
Load midlight 4.21 / 10.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Apple iPhone 15
3349 mAh
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Average Apple A18
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-37%
-48%
-15%
-5%
-16%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.9
-76%
0.66
-29%
0.42
18%
0.79
-55%
0.51
-0%
0.655 ?(0.51 - 0.8, n=2)
-28%
Idle Average *
1.42
1
30%
1.49
-5%
0.93
35%
1.08
24%
0.89
37%
1.21 ?(1 - 1.42, n=2)
15%
Idle Maximum *
1.43
1.1
23%
1.78
-24%
1.07
25%
1.12
22%
0.92
36%
1.315 ?(1.2 - 1.43, n=2)
8%
Load Average *
4.21
6
-43%
7.44
-77%
15.43
-267%
7.93
-88%
9.08
-116%
6.86 ?(4.21 - 9.5, n=2)
-63%
Load Maximum *
10.96
13.6
-24%
16.64
-52%
16.51
-51%
8.78
20%
9.11
17%
12.3 ?(11 - 13.6, n=2)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.8 (0.822-12.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.85 (1.662-13.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.943 (0.879-1.126)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.37-11.3)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.88 (6.08-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Apple iPhone 15 Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.943 (0.879-1.126)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

电池寿命

iPhone 15iPhone 16 的电池使用时间更长,不仅是因为它的电池容量比 iPhone 15 大 6%。模拟网上冲浪时间超过 18 小时,连续循环播放高清视频时长达 23 小时 7 分钟,在运行时间方面也有更好的表现。在日常使用中,根据不同的使用情况,这一小块电池的优势会非常明显。

在极端情况下,即在 Linpack 应用程序提供的连续计算压力下,智能手机可以持续运行 3 小时 37 分钟,然后才需要再次插入电源。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
46h 12min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Apple iPhone 15
3349 mAh
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
-14%
-18%
17%
14%
Reader / Idle
2772
2698
-3%
2098
-24%
2398
-13%
2788
1%
2926
6%
H.264
1385
1305
-6%
977
-29%
1227
-11%
1493
8%
1674
21%
WiFi v1.3
1096
1002
-9%
990
-10%
880
-20%
952
-13%
1092
0%
Load
217
306
41%
232
7%
159
-27%
371
71%
277
28%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Apple iPhone 16 是一款非常出色的智能手机,它拥有强大的功能和 6.1 英寸的小巧机身,但仍然只能继续依赖 60 Hz 的屏幕。

Apple iPhone 16 - 11/11/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
64 / 69 → 92%
Weight
92%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
86 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
95%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 90 → 94%
Camera
80%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87.2%
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
71%
Software Updates
83.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 80.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone 16 智能手机评测--创新超乎想象
Manuel Masiero, 2024-10-28 (Update: 2024-10-28)