Notebookcheck Logo

2021Apple iPad 10.2(第九代)评论。最实惠的Apple 平板电脑的微妙改进

软体等级。 Apple iPad 2021今年只提供了一个小的升级,主要集中在处理器、存储和前置摄像头上。继续阅读,了解第九代iPad还有哪些创新。
Apple Tablet Touchscreen

第九代iPad通常被称为iPad 9、iPad 10.2(2021),或者干脆称为iPad 2021。但这总是指Apple'的经济型平板电脑,今年的起价也是稳定的MSRP为329美元。

去年的型号,最明显的区别是更大的存储空间,入门级型号的存储空间增加了一倍,达到64GB,而顶级型号则有256GB。也就是说,5G还没有进入iPad,带有蜂窝调制解调器的型号仍然只支持LTE。

iPad (10.2", Wi-Fi, 64 GB) (iPad Series)
Processor
Apple A13 Bionic 6 x - 2.7 GHz, Lightning and Thunder
Graphics adapter
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
10.20 inch 4:3, 2160 x 1620 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive, IPS, True Tone, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB SSD, 64 GB 
, 49.91 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Lightning, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, Lightning
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 250.6 x 174.1
Battery
32.4 Wh, 8686 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.73 V
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4, 31 mm, 1.12 µm)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, 122°)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: on-screen, 20-watt charger, USB-C-to-Lightning cable, sticker, Quick Start guide, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
487 g, Power Supply: 74 g
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
88 %
10/2020
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU
495 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
88.4 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600
83.1 %
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
467 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.4 %
10/2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
655 g7.9 mm11.00"2000x1200

外壳--iPad保留了其铝制一体成型的外壳

Apple iPad 9在视觉上与iPad 8

,但它的重量少了几克。这款平板电脑由完全由回收的铝制成的一体式机身组成,并再次提供银色和太空灰两种颜色。

制造质量是完美的。iPad坚固、纤细,触感很好,显示屏玻璃和外壳之间的过渡非常平滑和流线型。背面的摄像头略微凹陷,这样平板电脑就能绝对平躺在光滑的表面上。

Apple ,通过进一步减少二氧化碳排放量,使其对环境的影响得到了一定的改善。包装中含有更多的回收材料,甚至连稀土元素现在也是100%回收和再利用。

Size comparison

256.8 mm 169 mm 7.9 mm 655 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 7.25 mm 485 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 487 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 495 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g

连接性 - 仍然只有蓝牙4.2

Apple ,在连接方面没有提供任何新功能。iPad 2021仍然有一个Lightning ,一个音频插孔,它可以使用第一代铅笔,并且可以通过针状连接器连接到可选的键盘。不幸的是,Apple ,今年也拒绝更新有些尘封的蓝牙标准。

iPad 9提供以下配置变体。

  • 配备Wi-Fi和64GB的iPad,售价329美元
  • 配备Wi-Fi和256GB的iPad,售价479美元
  • 配备Wi-Fi、LTE和64GB的iPad,售价459美元
  • 配备Wi-Fi、LTE和256GB的iPad,售价609美元
顶部:音频、麦克风、电源
顶部:音频、麦克风、电源
左边:智能键盘的引脚连接器
左边:智能键盘的引脚连接器
右边。音量摇杆
右边。音量摇杆
底部。扬声器,Lightning ,扬声器
底部。扬声器,Lightning ,扬声器

软件--iPadOS 15,改进了多任务处理功能

Apple iPad 10.2(2021)配备了最新的iPadOS 15,主要提供优化的多任务处理,我们已经从iPhone ,以及FaceTime和Widgets的大量增强功能。此外,来自iPad Air

的涂鸦功能现在也可用于iPad。

关于iPadOS 15的新功能的全面概述,请访问Apple's网站。

通信和GNSS--带Wi-Fi 5和可选LTE的iPad

我们的评测样本是Wi-Fi版的iPad 9。Apple 平板电脑支持2.4和5.0GHz以上的Wi-Fi 5,它拥有一个长的范围。与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器相结合的传输速度比上一代产品有所提高,但由于规格保持不变,这更可能是由于软件优化。

iPad可以选择使用LTE调制解调器,但还不支持5G。NFC不可用,而蓝牙4.2现在已经过时了。然而,由于较新产品的向后兼容性,在日常使用中不应该有任何限制。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s ∼65%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
459 (223min - 497max) MBit/s ∼51% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
231 (114min - 380max) MBit/s ∼26% -61%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140 (55min - 209max) MBit/s ∼16% -76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
613 (300min - 633max) MBit/s ∼79% +26%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s ∼62%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
342 (291min - 400max) MBit/s ∼44% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
141 (83min - 201max) MBit/s ∼18% -71%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø478 (191-554)
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (291-400)
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø577 (290-624)
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø452 (223-497)

Apple ,并没有透露iPad 2021除了GPS之外支持的卫星网络。尽管如此,在日常使用中,我们的位置被迅速确定,即使在室内,延迟时间也很短。

在我们的试驾过程中,这款平板电脑必须与Garmin Edge 500保持一致。在长距离行驶中,iPad显示的路线比自行车电脑更详细。

GNSS试骑。湖泊
GNSS试骑。湖泊
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结

摄像头 - 前置摄像头是明星产品

用iPad 9拍摄的自拍
用iPad 9拍摄的自拍

后置主摄像头与过去几年的纸质摄像头相同,它绝对不是一个亮点。然而,它对于简单的照片和捕捉文件来说是绰绰有余的。一个小的辅助LED在这里会很有帮助。视频可以用全高清和25、30或60FPS录制。

Apple ,将前置摄像头的分辨率提高了10倍,以便为所有FaceTime功能提供最佳装备。这也是一个超广角镜头,现在有122度的视野,所以也支持视频通话或集体自拍中的跟拍模式等功能。图像质量相当好,但在低光照条件下噪点会很快出现。使用该镜头还可以录制全高清分辨率的视频,最高可达60FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleZoom (5x)Low light
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 2021: 8.24 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 16.38 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 2021: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修 - 仍包括一个充电器

Apple iPad 9配备了一个模块化的20瓦充电器,它有一个USB-C接口。此外,还包括一条Lightning-to-USB-C电缆,文件和两张Apple 贴纸。

可选的是,Apple ,还提供Pencil输入笔(第一代,99美元),兼容的智能键盘(159美元),以及其他外壳和适配器。

有12个月的保修期,这并不影响零售商的保修。AppleCare+保险套餐可以一次性购买,费用为69美元,或每月仅需3.49美元。它涵盖的期限为两年,每年最多允许两次维修,包括同时购买的铅笔或智能键盘的维修。

输入设备和处理方式--iPad 9的Touch ID

iPad 10.2 (2021)的电容式触摸屏感觉就像的前辈

;它的工作非常可靠,对每个触摸输入都有准确的反应。这款平板电脑还支持铅笔(第一代),在测试中工作顺利,提供了良好的书写体验。然而,略微突出的显示玻璃使书写一开始有点尴尬,因为笔总是在书写表面上方徘徊。

Apple ,预装了内部键盘,但也可以用App Store的其他变体代替。另外,也可以使用智能键盘,求助于以前的模型也不会造成任何问题。

生物识别安全是由集成在Home键上的Touch ID功能提供的。指纹扫描仪在测试中工作得相当快而且非常可靠。

显示器 - iPad 9采用无PWM的IPS面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

Apple

iPad(2021)有一个10.2英寸(25.91厘米,322.2平方厘米)的IPS面板,并没有完全贴合。虽然这使得一开始用铅笔写字时有一种尴尬的空洞感,但在可维修性方面是个优点。

与前代产品相比,亮度略有提高,在使用纯白背景和APL50测量时都是一样的。没有环境光传感器控制的用户仍然可以利用全亮度。黑色水平略微提高到0.5cd/m²,但它仍然足以实现良好的对比度。

在最低亮度下,用示波器可以检测到一种高频闪烁,但这不是传统的PWM,所以不应该有任何不适感。

497
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
506
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 513 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 490.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 507 cd/m²
Contrast: 1014:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 11.00
Screen
-15%
-53%
-54%
-44%
Brightness middle
507
477
-6%
550
8%
503
-1%
380
-25%
Brightness
491
452
-8%
515
5%
477
-3%
376
-23%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
90
0%
91
1%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.5
0.5
-0%
0.96
-92%
0.29
42%
0.24
52%
Contrast
1014
954
-6%
573
-43%
1734
71%
1583
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
2.2
-29%
3.3
-94%
4.4
-159%
4.61
-171%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
5
-28%
7.9
-103%
10.4
-167%
8.77
-125%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
3.3
-38%
4.9
-104%
7.5
-213%
5.1
-113%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.19 100%
2.248 98%
CCT
6923 94%
7019 93%
7288 89%
7700 84%
7966 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 40000 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 40000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 40000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21847 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们用分光光度计和CalMAN分析软件检查了iPad 9的图片质量,发现它总体上是好的。青色是唯一显示出明显偏离目标的颜色,但这在日常使用中不应该是个问题。当 "真实色调 "功能被禁用时,浅色调在灰度方面有点太冷。

灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(目标色彩空间:sRGB
颜色(目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

iPad在户外的阴凉处依然清晰可辨。在阳光直射下,这就比较困难了,因为亮度不是很高,而且突出的显示屏玻璃有利于产生恼人的反射。

iPad 10.2(2021)中的IPS面板的视角稳定性很好。色彩的准确性在任何时候都得到了保留,平视角度下的亮度损失也保持在一定范围内。在我们的测试设备中,我们无法确定发光或鬼影效应。同样,我们也没有注意到任何令人烦恼的屏幕出血现象。

Apple iPad的视角稳定性(2021年)。
Apple iPad的视角稳定性(2021年)。

性能--iPad 2021是同类产品中的王者

安兔兔存储测试
安兔兔存储测试

2021年的Apple ,iPad由2019年的A13 Bionic

,它可以使用3GB的内存。

尽管采用了较旧的SoC,但与竞争对手相比,iPad在基准测试中表现强劲。只有在现在有些过时的3DMark Sling Shot(Extreme)中,我们没有获得第一的结果,或者说MatePad 11(Snapdragon 865)更有优势。在所有其他基准测试中,iPad明显领先。

安兔兔的存储测试让人有点吃惊,因为结果比前代产品要弱。与目前的iPhone 13 Pro 相比,iPad在这项测试中的速度甚至不及一半。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
1342 Points ∼66% +1%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (1326 - 1342, n=4)
1333 Points ∼65% 0%
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points ∼65%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
1116 Points ∼55% -16%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
905 Points ∼44% -32%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=45, last 2 years)
703 Points ∼34% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
483 Points ∼24% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
345 Points ∼17% -74%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3531 Points ∼12% +9%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (3235 - 3531, n=4)
3381 Points ∼12% +5%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3288 Points ∼11% +2%
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points ∼11%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
2772 Points ∼10% -14%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=45, last 2 years)
2388 Points ∼8% -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1593 Points ∼6% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1207 Points ∼4% -63%
Vulkan Score 5.3
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3302 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (90 - 27300, n=26, last 2 years)
2867 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2041 Points ∼1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
10427 Points ∼62%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (9199 - 10699, n=3)
10108 Points ∼60%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9901 Points ∼59%
Average of class Tablet (527 - 13682, n=38, last 2 years)
4613 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3122 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2074 Points ∼12%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
20154 Points ∼47%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (17853 - 20154, n=3)
19381 Points ∼45%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
13005 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (475 - 42751, n=38, last 2 years)
8028 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3055 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2021 Points ∼5%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5394 Points ∼78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3877 Points ∼56%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (3411 - 4052, n=3)
3780 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3346 Points ∼49%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=38, last 2 years)
2953 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2283 Points ∼33%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points ∼0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
8089 Points ∼70% +51%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
6006 Points ∼52% +12%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (5362 - 6067, n=4)
5781 Points ∼50% +8%
Apple iPad 2021
5362 Points ∼47%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
5049 Points ∼44% -6%
Average of class Tablet (305 - 9630, n=40, last 2 years)
3718 Points ∼32% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2609 Points ∼23% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1649 Points ∼14% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021
9773 Points ∼38%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9428 Points ∼37% -4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (7847 - 9773, n=4)
8528 Points ∼33% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
8374 Points ∼33% -14%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
6175 Points ∼24% -37%
Average of class Tablet (258 - 25707, n=40, last 2 years)
5220 Points ∼20% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2476 Points ∼10% -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1528 Points ∼6% -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5403 Points ∼68% +160%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3492 Points ∼44% +68%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3082 Points ∼39% +48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
3018 Points ∼38% +45%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=40, last 2 years)
2934 Points ∼37% +41%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (2078 - 3219, n=4)
2803 Points ∼35% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2280 Points ∼29% +10%
Apple iPad 2021
2078 Points ∼26%
Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021
7457 Points ∼7%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (7245 - 7457, n=3)
7326 Points ∼7% -2%
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=28, last 2 years)
4750 Points ∼4% -36%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3818 Points ∼3% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1363 Points ∼1% -82%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average Apple A13 Bionic (7800 - 8037, n=4)
7927 Points ∼7% +1%
Apple iPad 2021
7858 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
7800 Points ∼7% -1%
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=26, last 2 years)
5581 Points ∼5% -29%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3823 Points ∼3% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1371 Points ∼1% -83%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021
1992 Points ∼4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (1901 - 2080, n=3)
1991 Points ∼4% 0%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=24, last 2 years)
1627 Points ∼3% -18%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1116 Points ∼2% -44%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
372 Points ∼1% -81%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021
1872 Points ∼4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (1402 - 1931, n=3)
1735 Points ∼4% -7%
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=24, last 2 years)
1577 Points ∼3% -16%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1103 Points ∼2% -41%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
376 Points ∼1% -80%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=39, last 2 years)
63.1 fps ∼2% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
60 fps ∼2% 0%
Apple iPad 2021
60 fps ∼2%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (59 - 60, n=5)
59.8 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
58 fps ∼2% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
44 fps ∼1% -27%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
309 fps ∼2% +1%
Apple iPad 2021
307 fps ∼2%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (250 - 322, n=5)
295 fps ∼2% -4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
239 fps ∼2% -22%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
206 fps ∼2% -33%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=39, last 2 years)
171.2 fps ∼1% -44%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
79 fps ∼1% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
48 fps ∼0% -84%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
60 fps ∼16% 0%
Apple iPad 2021
60 fps ∼16%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (60 - 60, n=5)
60 fps ∼16% 0%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
58 fps ∼16% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
58 fps ∼16% -3%
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=38, last 2 years)
48.3 fps ∼13% -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
42 fps ∼12% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
24 fps ∼7% -60%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
168 fps ∼13% +1%
Apple iPad 2021
167 fps ∼13%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (149 - 175, n=5)
163.2 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
131 fps ∼10% -22%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
127 fps ∼10% -24%
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=39, last 2 years)
97.4 fps ∼8% -42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
46 fps ∼4% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
26 fps ∼2% -84%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
60 fps ∼2% +5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (57 - 60, n=5)
59.4 fps ∼2% +4%
Apple iPad 2021
57 fps ∼2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
49.51 fps ∼1% -13%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
45 fps ∼1% -21%
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=39, last 2 years)
34.8 fps ∼1% -39%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
26 fps ∼1% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
14 fps ∼0% -75%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
112 fps ∼2% +2%
Apple iPad 2021
110 fps ∼2%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (93 - 117, n=5)
106.4 fps ∼2% -3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
89 fps ∼2% -19%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
85.8 fps ∼2% -22%
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 229, n=39, last 2 years)
66.6 fps ∼1% -39%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
29 fps ∼1% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
16 fps ∼0% -85%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average Apple A13 Bionic (43 - 60, n=5)
52 fps ∼1% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
49 fps ∼1% +14%
Apple iPad 2021
43 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
31.72 fps ∼1% -26%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
27 fps ∼1% -37%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=39, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼1% -45%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
16 fps ∼0% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.6 fps ∼0% -78%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
69 fps ∼0%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (59 - 73, n=5)
65.4 fps ∼0% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
63 fps ∼0% -9%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
52 fps ∼0% -25%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
51.3 fps ∼0% -26%
Average of class Tablet (2.1 - 153.5, n=39, last 2 years)
41.5 fps ∼0% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
18 fps ∼0% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼0% -86%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average Apple A13 Bionic (35 - 60, n=5)
49.2 fps ∼31% +41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
45 fps ∼29% +29%
Apple iPad 2021
35 fps ∼22%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
25.34 fps ∼16% -28%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
18 fps ∼11% -49%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=43, last 2 years)
16.9 fps ∼11% -52%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
10 fps ∼6% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5.8 fps ∼4% -83%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
31 fps ∼10%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (29 - 33, n=5)
30.6 fps ∼10% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
29 fps ∼9% -6%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
23.09 fps ∼7% -26%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
21 fps ∼7% -32%
Average of class Tablet (0.87 - 70, n=43, last 2 years)
16.1 fps ∼5% -48%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
6.5 fps ∼2% -79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
3.6 fps ∼1% -88%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
57 fps ∼28% +14%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (50 - 60, n=5)
57 fps ∼28% +14%
Apple iPad 2021
50 fps ∼24%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
37.01 fps ∼18% -26%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
29 fps ∼14% -42%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=43, last 2 years)
24.2 fps ∼12% -52%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
17 fps ∼8% -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.7 fps ∼5% -81%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
82 fps ∼11%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (72 - 87, n=5)
78 fps ∼10% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
74 fps ∼10% -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
62.4 fps ∼8% -24%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
54 fps ∼7% -34%
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 191, n=43, last 2 years)
42.8 fps ∼6% -48%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
19 fps ∼3% -77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼1% -88%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
628715 Points ∼53% +1%
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points ∼52%
Average Apple A13 Bionic
622382 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=24, last 2 years)
553815 Points ∼47% -11%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
549549 Points ∼46% -12%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
323166 Points ∼27% -48%

Legend

 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe

你可以用Apple iPad 9快速浏览网页,而且这款平板电脑在基准测试中的表现优于其竞争者。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.2 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (128.5 - 142.2, n=5)
134.5 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
128.5 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
123.8 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=33, last 2 years)
80.5 Points ∼57% -43%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
66.6 Points ∼47% -53%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
35.99 Points ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
27.46 Points ∼19% -81%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
300 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (279 - 302, n=5)
293 Points ∼98% +1%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
291.1 Points ∼97%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
266.8 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=39, last 2 years)
146.2 Points ∼49% -50%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
112.9 Points ∼38% -61%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
69.8 Points ∼23% -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
50.3 Points ∼17% -83%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
183 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (146 - 202, n=5)
179.2 Points ∼89% -11%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
166 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
105 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=40, last 2 years)
104.4 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
54 Points ∼27% -73%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
53 Points ∼26% -74%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min ∼100%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (153 - 171, n=5)
158.4 runs/min ∼93% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
153 runs/min ∼89% -11%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
139 runs/min ∼81% -19%
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=31, last 2 years)
86.4 runs/min ∼51% -49%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
65.5 runs/min ∼38% -62%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
33.5 runs/min ∼20% -80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
29.2 runs/min ∼17% -83%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
49151 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (47288 - 49388, n=5)
48727 Points ∼99% +3%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points ∼96%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
41443 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=38, last 2 years)
25692 Points ∼52% -46%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
24196 Points ∼49% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
15632 Points ∼32% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
9415 Points ∼19% -80%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
4872 ms * ∼100% -794%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
3782 ms * ∼78% -594%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=41, last 2 years)
3626 ms * ∼74% -565%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1933 ms * ∼40% -255%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
653 ms * ∼13% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572 ms * ∼12% -5%
Average Apple A13 Bionic (545 - 573, n=5)
562 ms * ∼12% -3%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
545 ms * ∼11%

* ... smaller is better

游戏 -Apple's A13为玩家提供无限乐趣

Apple A13

在iPad中已经使用了两年,但它仍然提供了巨大的GPU能力,这对于App Store中的所有游戏来说应该是绰绰有余。

尽管它的尺寸很大,但这台平板电脑相当适合游戏,因为它很适合拿在手里,不太重,而且由于边框很宽,可以提供良好的握持感。

当我们用GameBench 检查游戏性能时,我们没有能够确定任何限制。即使是要求很高的游戏,也能在最高的细节设置下顺利运行。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.4.0: Ø59.5 (57-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (49-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.6.0: Ø59.5 (57-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.3 (34-40)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.3 (37-40)

排放 - 不太暖和,声音还算不错

温度

GFXBench电池测试。T-Rex
T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试。曼哈顿
曼哈顿

Apple

iPad 9的表面温度在空闲使用时已经略微升高,但在连续负载时,温度只略有增加。

SoC很好地管理了由此产生的废热。在GFXBench电池测试中,连续30次重复相应的场景,除了记录电池状态外,还记录帧率,该平板电脑基本上保持稳定。虽然T-Rex测试(OpenGL ES 2.0)不构成问题,但在曼哈顿基准测试(Metal)中,性能曲线略有下降,但不到3%,损失非常小。

在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中,iPad的第一次运行特别强大;随后下降了一点,但随后保持在一个持续的高水平。

3DMark Wild Life stress test

0510152025303540Tooltip
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)
Max. Load
 35.5 °C35.6 °C36 °C 
 34.4 °C34.2 °C33.3 °C 
 35.4 °C35.6 °C34.8 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 35 °C
33.2 °C34.3 °C34.4 °C
32.9 °C34.6 °C34.1 °C
32.8 °C34.9 °C33.7 °C
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.

发言人

底部的两个扬声器提供了均衡的声音,包括中等音量下的一些低音。在iPad上调高音量将导致更高的音调输出,有时在音量高峰期会出现失真。

除了通过蓝牙进行无线连接外,还可以通过音频插孔(3.5毫米)将耳机或外部扬声器连接到Apple ,其非常低的噪音输出(信噪比:102.75 dBFS)给人留下深刻印象。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203734.42525.637.43129.137.24023.440.35036.843.26328.441.38024.841.710022.444.312519.246.716016.95820015.655.825013.857.631513.46240013.361.950013.865.86301268.180012.769.8100012.275.912501373.8160013.777.9200013.276.8250013.478.831501380.2400013.381.6500013.682.5630013.385.2800013.883.61000013.778.4125001473.81600013.571.2SPL25.591.9N0.789.5median 13.5median 73.8Delta0.78.435.838.332.228.225.1262129.734.433.62433.528.94922.851.417.657.319.262.515.862.515.565.715.769.71369.712.472.814.47314.774.412.878.214.679.113.578.713.178.213.576.413.466.813.367.913.373.613.472.413.766.913.26813.257.412.255.325.987.20.772.1median 13.5median 69.71.75.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad 2021Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei MatePad 11 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--Apple ,电池寿命长的平板电脑

能源消耗

在大多数方面,耗电量令人惊讶地高于前代产品。附带的20瓦电源适配器的尺寸仍然绰绰有余,但它不支持真正的快速充电,因为它需要近4个小时才能为iPad完全充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 7.5 / 7.58 Watt
Load midlight 10.03 / 10.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
8827 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Power Consumption
-5%
19%
28%
47%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
2.12
-63%
1.33
-2%
1.21
7%
1.2
8%
Idle Average *
7.5
6.43
14%
5.37
28%
4.24
43%
1.5
80%
Idle Maximum *
7.58
6.69
12%
5.41
29%
4.34
43%
1.9
75%
Load Average *
10.03
8.17
19%
6.87
32%
6.99
30%
4.9
51%
Load Maximum *
10.91
11.84
-9%
10.08
8%
8.79
19%
8.8
19%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic: Ø7.02 (2.66-13.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: Ø4.42 (2.21-8.49)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (6.88-12.6)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.24 (3.01-8.63)
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic; Idle 1min: Ø2.87 (2.83-2.97)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; Idle 1min: Ø2.34 (2.28-2.92)

电池寿命

与去年的型号(32.9Wh)相比,iPad 9的电池略微缩水至32.4Wh,但较新的Apple ,平板电脑的运行时间仍然略好,这主要得益于更高效的SoC。只有在视频播放过程中,iPad 8

,才会更持久一点。

在我们调整了显示屏亮度(150cd/m²)的实际Wi-Fi测试中,所有竞争对手都彼此接近,只有Yoga Tab 11,设法突出一点。不过,总的来说,iPad 10.2的电池寿命确实不错。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15)
13h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 13min
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
8827 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-5%
5%
0%
Reader / Idle
2292
2241
-2%
1972
-14%
2120
-8%
1835
-20%
H.264
898
934
4%
864
-4%
950
6%
1115
24%
WiFi v1.3
805
782
-3%
835
4%
792
-2%
891
11%
Load
253
238
-6%
236
-7%
309
22%
216
-15%

Pros

+ 高质量的铝制一体式机身
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速的SoC
+ 广泛的配件种类
+ 长期提供更新

Cons

- 只有蓝牙4.2
- 充电时间长

判决--10周年前的最后一个里程碑

回顾:Apple iPad (2021)
回顾:Apple iPad (2021)

iPad是我们今天所知的第一款平板电脑,虽然我们的评测单位只是Apple ,是这一领域最实惠的入门级产品,但它做得很好,归根结底,是一款非常好的平板。它提供了一流的感觉,高性能和长生命周期。一些制造商可以从Apple"的书中吸取经验。

入门级产品的额外存储早该出现了,而新的SoC是一个合乎逻辑的结果。我们发现摄像头的升级是非常积极的,特别是由于iPad是学校里很受欢迎的平板电脑,因此它是未来视频会议的理想装备。

iPad(2021年)提供了一个强大的整体包装,用户将在很长一段时间内享受。

当然,设计有点老套,存储不能扩展,没有USB接口,这些都是被批评的地方。作为回报,前辈们的配件可以继续使用,价格也一直保持稳定。如果Apple 有为周年纪念版iPad进行更全面升级的计划,这种情况可能在明年发生变化。

在类似的价格范围内,支持手写笔的好的Android 平板电脑是Galaxy Tab S6 Lite华为MatePad 11

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

Apple iPad(2021)的所有颜色和配置可直接从。Apple.你也可以在亚马逊上找到它,百思买,Newegg, 和沃尔玛,例如。

Apple iPad 2021 - 10/15/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 66%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
90%
Display
88%
Games Performance
61 / 78 → 78%
Application Performance
91 / 92 → 99%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
79%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 2021Apple iPad 10.2(第九代)评论。最实惠的Apple 平板电脑的微妙改进
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-10-21 (Update: 2021-10-21)