对摩托罗拉 Moto Pad 60 Pro 的评价
时尚的 Pantone 绿、别致的外壳凹槽设计和闪亮的摩托罗拉标志、坚固的一体式外壳--是的，你可以对摩托罗拉 Moto Pad 60 Pro 的设计如痴如醉。特别是对于一款售价不到 400 美元的平板电脑来说，这绝非理所当然。
然而，对于西方国家的人来说，它很难买到，而且只能更新到Android 16。此外，在平板电脑正式销售的地方也不会出现保修问题。
就其价格而言，摩托罗拉 Moto Pad 60 Pro 提供了强大的功能和快速的屏幕，尽管它可以更亮一些。快速 WLAN 甚至卫星定位也令人满意。
你不得不放弃移动网络选项，而摄像头则更像是一种临时解决方案。此外，平板电脑的重量也相对较大。
总的来说，这是一款物美价廉的平板电脑。
如果你喜欢它的设计，也许值得进口。不过，如果你只看重性价比，联想 Idea Tab Pro 对西方人来说是更好的选择，因为它无需进口费用，还附带保修。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们的设备是从Ebay从印度进口的。除了高昂的运费，我们还不得不面对近一个月的漫长交货期和进口关税。
如果你不太在意外观设计，你也可以购买联想 Idea Tab Pro，它与联想 Idea Tab Pro 几乎完全相同，在普通商店也能买到。例如，amazon.com提供的价格约为 360 美元。
规格
表壳和功能 - 真正的设计师作品
机身上别致的古铜绿色是由 Pantone 选定的，在平板电脑上看起来非常漂亮：既适合商务用途，又能给朋友留下深刻印象。无论如何，金属一体成型机身都能实现这一点。
虽然这款平板电脑与 联想 Idea Tab Pro背面的设计非常独特：中央有一个闪闪发光的摩托罗拉标志，顶部的摄像头模块周围有一个斜条纹图案。
这款平板电脑非常坚固，并通过了 IP52 认证，这意味着它可以防止滴水和灰尘。
Moto Pad 60 Pro 有 8 或 12 GB 内存和 128 或 256 GB 存储空间可供选择。我们测试的是存储容量较小的版本，它使用 UFS 3.1 闪存。USB 端口可以传输高达 5 GBit/s 的数据，还可以通过Display Port 连接显示器。
有一个 microSD 读卡器，运行速度非常快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 58.4, n=55, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 快速 WiFi 6E
Moto Pad 60 Pro 没有连接到移动网络的版本，但你可以获得 WiFi 6E，从而访问较少使用的 6 GHz 频段。我们的测试设备接收和发送数据的速度相当快，可以轻松赶上同价位的其他平板电脑。
144 Hz 显示屏操作流畅。待机键位于机身左侧，并集成了指纹识别器。它可用于可靠、快速地解锁平板电脑。
Moto Pen Pro 包含在供货范围内。除指纹识别器外，它还与联想 Tab Pen Plus 相对应。由于具有 4,096 级压力，它可以进行精确的绘图和书写。如有必要，可将笔用磁铁吸附在平板电脑背面。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor Pad 10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 与联想相比几乎没有差异
该软件与联想 Idea Tab Pro 上的 ZUI 非常相似。 联想 Idea Tab Pro的 ZUI 非常相似；从下面的截图中可以看到直接对比。除了摩托罗拉的启动动画和品牌风格的初始设置外，预装程序也有一些差异。这可能是因为我们的 Moto Pad 60 Pro 来自印度。
软件更新的截止日期是Android 16，因此可能要等到明年。
摩托罗拉 Moto Pad 60 Pro 的包装没有使用塑料。然而，除此之外，几乎没有任何有关可持续发展的信息。
照相机 - 适合日常使用
平板电脑的摄像头更像是一个临时解决方案。后置 1300 万像素镜头拍摄的照片尚可，但在亮部和暗部都会丢失细节。在弱光环境下，图像会变得颗粒感很强，摄像头涂层也无法防止镜头反光。
视频最高分辨率可达 4K，每秒 30 格。
800 万像素前置摄像头拍摄的图像基本可用，但明亮区域很快也会曝光过度。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingMain camera low light
显示屏 - 亮度越高越好
IPS 屏幕直径为 12.7 英寸，分辨率为 2,944 x 1,840 像素。与 Idea Tab Pro的差别很小：它采用了相同的面板和类似的预校准。
虽然 400 cd/m² 左右的亮度在这个级别中是可以接受的，但在明亮的环境中使用通常是不够的，因为显示屏上很快就会出现反光。
即使在亮度很低的情况下，我们也没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 413 cd/m²
Contrast: 918:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.85 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.239
CCT: 7476 K
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Teclast Art Pad Pro IPS, 2176x1600, 12.7" | Honor Pad 10 IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -2% | 11% | -48% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 413 | 409 -1% | 513 24% | 291 -30% | 529 28% |
| Brightness | 394 | 388 -2% | 480 22% | 269 -32% | 499 27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 86 -3% | 82 -8% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.4 11% | 0.4 11% | 0.33 27% | 0.5 -11% |
| Contrast | 918 | 1023 11% | 1283 40% | 882 -4% | 1058 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.85 | 3.46 -21% | 2.82 1% | 7.79 -173% | 2 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.16 | 5.46 11% | 8.83 -43% | 10.97 -78% | 4.79 22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.2 -21% | 2.9 33% | 8 -86% | 3.6 16% |
| Gamma | 2.239 98% | 2.106 104% | 2.265 97% | 2.007 110% | 2.248 98% |
| CCT | 7476 87% | 5823 112% | 7189 90% | 8922 73% | 7398 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8255 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--功率强劲，音质绝佳
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 8300在同价位机型中，它是一款真正的强力产品，能让系统流畅运行，并能使用更复杂的应用程序。
发热量保持在非常合理的水平，在连续负载的情况下，系统只会出现极小的节流。
系统配有四个扬声器，由 JBL 调音。声音强劲有力，低频也清晰可闻。外部音频设备可通过 USB 或蓝牙连接。后者可使用所有重要的音频编解码器。
Moto Pad 60 Pro 配有充电器，最大充电功率为 45 瓦。这意味着 10,200 毫安时电池只需 2 小时 20 分钟即可充满。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款平板电脑的续航时间达到了 13 小时 7 分钟，在这个价位的平板电脑中处于平均水平。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (211 - 1483, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Pad 10 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (154 - 9666, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Pad 10 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Quantized NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (88 - 13178, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Pad 10 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | Teclast Art Pad Pro | Honor Pad 10 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 86% | -42% | -36% | 8% | -29% | -25% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 2123 | 3648.3 72% | 844.9 -60% | 1007.37 -53% | 1918.12 -10% | 1589 ? -25% | 1522 ? -28% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1745 | 3298.5 89% | 705.3 -60% | 873.36 -50% | 1632.94 -6% | 757 ? -57% | 1138 ? -35% |
| Random Read 4KB | 244 | 474.4 94% | 215.5 -12% | 237.46 -3% | 342.88 41% | 242 ? -1% | 225 ? -8% |
| Random Write 4KB | 352 | 668 90% | 231.4 -34% | 215.52 -39% | 375.28 7% | 240 ? -32% | 255 ? -28% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor Pad 10 | |
| Teclast Art Pad Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 10200 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Teclast Art Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Honor Pad 10 10100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | 17% | -23% | 12% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 787 | 798 1% | 924 17% | 608 -23% | 879 12% |
| Reader / Idle | 1523 | 2236 | |||
| H.264 | 1018 | 1052 | |||
| Load | 256 | 245 |
笔记本检查总体评价
摩托罗拉 Moto Pad 60 Pro 看起来非常吸引人，而且物有所值。
不过，鉴于其姊妹机型联想 Idea Tab Pro 的存在，将其进口到欧洲几乎是不值得的，除非你绝对必须拥有这款名牌产品。
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- 09/10/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83%  | Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $16.99 15W Motorola Wireless Charge... 2. $19.49 Case for Motorola Moto Pad 6... 3. $12.98 Case for Motorola Moto Pad 6... List Price: 310€ | 620 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS |
2. 82.3%  | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $359.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 2. $328.28 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, 12.7" 3... 3. $321.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro TB373FU ... List Price: 379€ | 620 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS |
3. 78.7%  | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $286.00 List Price: 380€ | 571 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
4. 75.8%  | Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $239.99 TECLAST Artpadpro Android 15... 2. $18.98 NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Prote... 3. $16.98 NOUKAJU Screen Protector for... List Price: 350 Euro | 674 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.70" 2176x1600 213 PPI IPS |
5. 81.5%  | Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 720 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $36.99 Keyboard Case for Honor Pad ... 2. $16.66 BMPNLSZ TPU Cover for Honor ... 3. $9.99 for Honor pad 10 Tablet Case... List Price: 300 Euro | 525 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
