Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarAcemagic Tank 03 游戏 PC 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 GPU 的小型迷你 PC 也能驾驭当前游戏
凭借 Acemagic Tank03，该制造商首次推出了一款名副其实的强大游戏电脑。结合了 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H与 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑为游戏电脑的成功奠定了坚实的基础。此外，在我们的设备配置中，Tank03 还提供 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1,024 GB SSD。制造商将所有这些都装进了一个时尚的机箱中，比普通台式电脑要小巧得多。另一方面，这些设备的价格也不便宜，我们在这里测试的顶级机型需要支付约 2000 欧元（约合人民币 2,155 元）。另外，Acemagic Tank03 也可以配备 英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H和 英伟达GeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑或 英伟达GeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑.最经济实惠的型号（英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H、NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘）目前在 Acemagic 内部商店的售价为1399 美元。
作为一项特殊功能，Acemagic Tank03 可以将处理器的性能调节到三个不同的级别。通过前面的拨盘可以选择静音、自动或性能模式。这将大大改变处理器的性能和风扇噪音，我们将在测试中继续区分各种性能模式。在我们的对比中，Acemagic Tank03 必须在 Minisforum、Intel 和 Zotac 的竞争对手面前证明自己。您可以在下表中找到对比设备的概览。
Acemagic Tank03 (Performance)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 115 W TDP ( including 115 W Dynamic Boost), Nvidia 537.42
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, 2 of 2 installed, max 64 GB
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
BiWin CE480V6D10H-1TB, 1024 GB
, NVMe, 940 GB free
Weight
2.168 kg, Power Supply: 1.116 kg
Price
2000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.6 % | 11/2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | 1.6 kg | 69.3 mm | |
| 88.4 % | 03/2023 | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon i7-12700H, A770M | 2 kg | 60 mm | |
| 87.1 % | 09/2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 i7-12650H, A730M | 1.7 kg | 66 mm | |
09/2022 | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 393 mm | ||
05/2022 | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 62.2 mm | ||
04/2022 | Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 i9-12900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | 189 mm | |||
12/2021 | Intel Beast Canyon NUC i9-11900KB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | 189 mm | |||
| Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) i7-10700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
王牌魔术师 Tank03 详情
外壳 - 一个带有大量塑料的小方块
Acemagic Tank03 的外观与许多其他迷你 PC 有很大不同。这也是必要的，因为所使用的组件需要相当大的冷却系统。不过，制造商还是设法将巨大的性能挤进了一个非常紧凑的机箱。在测试过程中，我们将看看由此带来的限制。它的占地面积只有 16 × 17.5 厘米（6.3 × 6.9 英寸），高度也只有 16 厘米（6.3 英寸）。设备本身的重量略高于 2.1 千克（约 4.6 磅），但你还必须考虑到巨大的 300 瓦电源，其重量为 1.1 千克（约 2.4 磅）。在材料方面，我们看到了塑料和金属的混合，其中塑料明显占主导地位。Acemagic Tank03 的侧面有两个维护挡板，无需任何工具即可拆卸。这两个挡板都采用金属表面，给人留下了优质的触感。该设备给人的整体印象也是如此：所有表面都显示出整洁的做工，材料的配合也非常出色。
作为视觉亮点，在性能选择转盘周围有一些 RGB 照明。在以后的版本中，这里还将包括一个小型显示屏，用于显示温度等系统信息。
设备
就其尺寸而言，Acemagic Tank03 提供了大量外部连接。迷你电脑由于结构紧凑，通常会面临空间不足的问题。但是，这款迷你型游戏 PC 配备了总共 7 个 USB 端口。此外，制造商还在机身前部配备了一个 Thunderbolt 端口。加上两个 HDMI 端口和 DisplayPort 连接，您可以同时运行多达四个外部显示器。甚至还有一个 SD 读卡器。
SD 读卡器
Acemagic 在 Tank03 中配备了 SD 读卡器。不过，它不适合传输大量数据，依赖它的用户应使用 USB 适配器。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (16.9 - 181.8, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom MiniAir 11 Special Edition (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 200, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom MiniAir 11 Special Edition (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
Acemagic Tank03 包含一个 Realtek（RTL8852BE）无线局域网模块。所使用的型号最多只能使用 5 GHz 频段，在我们的测试中达到了可接受的结果。不过，我们不断遇到一些零星的连接中断问题，只能通过重启来解决。这个问题在测试过程中反复出现。因此，我们决定更换 WLAN 模块。通过更换新的英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX210（价格约为 20 欧元，约合 22 美元），问题得到了解决。由于该机型也能处理更快的 6 GHz 频率，我们还在这里添加了性能数据。但使用速度更快的 WLAN 模块不会对整体评估产生影响，因为我们考虑的是所含机型的性能。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试路由器进行了所有 WLAN 测试。在无线网络连接方面，Acemagic Tank03 提供了两个端口，速度均高达 2.5 Gbit/s。
Acemagic Tank03 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1271 (663-1349)
Acemagic Tank03 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1586 (1490-1629)
Acemagic Tank03 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (927-969)
Acemagic Tank03 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (749-951)
Acemagic Tank03 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø796 (425-877)
Acemagic Tank03 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (448-909)
维护
Acemagic Tank03 有两个维护挡板，一侧一个。它们无需使用工具即可取下，可直接进入工作内存和存储解决方案。在我们的测试设备中，我们还发现了另一个可用的 M.2 插槽。如有必要，还可以更换 WLAN 模块。我们还尝试完全拆开设备，但没有成功。橡胶脚垫下面共有 8 颗螺丝，我们全部拧下。但是，我们仍然无法拆卸任何其他外壳元件。为了避免损坏的风险，我们没有继续拆卸。我们无法理解为什么制造商不允许我们直接进入机箱内部，因为机箱可能需要清洁，或者风扇在长时间使用后需要更换。
性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H，14 个内核，20 个线程
我们测试的 Acemagic Tank03 配置基于 英特尔酷睿 i7-12900H与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop 图形芯片相结合。这代表了 Acemagic Tank03 的顶级配置。此外，这款游戏电脑还可配备 英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H也可选择稍低的 3D 性能。在这方面，您可以选择 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 笔记本电脑或 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑。有了这些硬件，Acemagic Tank03 完全可以在游戏 PC 领域大显身手。
测试条件
在该设备的所有性能测试中，我们都使用了 "高性能 "Windows 电源配置文件。唯一的例外是根据我们的测试标准进行的功耗和噪音测量。此外，Acemagic Tank03 可以使用三种不同的性能模式运行：通过前面的拨盘，您可以选择静音模式（35 瓦）、自动模式（45 瓦）或高性能模式（65 瓦），甚至还可以在运行时进行切换。我们在三种模式下运行了下面所有的 CPU 基准测试，以找出性能差异。
处理器
英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 是一款基于英特尔 Alder Lake 架构的移动高端 SoC。该处理器的最大功耗限制为 65 瓦，因此其充分发挥潜力的能力受到了限制。在性能模式下，SoC 只能持续提供 45 瓦的功率。由于功耗限制过于保守，我们的测试设备无法与英特尔 NUC12 Serpent Canyon 保持同步。采用英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H 的竞争对手以 8 个百分点的优势领先于我们的测试设备。不过，这种性能差异并不明显。为了明确三种模式之间的差异，我们还在 "自动 "和 "静音 "模式下运行了所有的 CPU 基准测试。就性能差异而言，在静音模式下会损失约 16% 的性能，而在奥多模式下仅损失 2%。不过，根据不同的基准测试，两者的差异也会明显增大，但有时你也可以选择省电模式，而不会有太大的性能损失。
其他处理器基准测试
这里.Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Blender | wPrime 2.10 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | WinRAR | TrueCrypt | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark 11 | 7-Zip 18.03 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | R Benchmark 2.5 | LibreOffice | WebXPRT 3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | 3DMark
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Cinebench R15 多重循环中的 Acemagic Tank03
在 Cinebench R15 恒定循环期间，英特尔酷睿 i7-12900H 英特尔酷睿 i7-12900H在 Cinebench R15 恒定循环中，Acemagic Tank03 的英特尔酷睿 i7-12900H 只能短暂使用 Turbo。第一次运行后，我们发现三种模式下的性能都明显下降。在接下来的测试中，SoC 的性能保持相对稳定。对遥测数据的评估清楚地显示了各种性能模式造成的性能限制。
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance), Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1779 (1736.94-2045.09)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto), Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1407 (1375.09-1723.99)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent), Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø889 (858.98-1345.62)
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G Neptune Series HX77G, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2215 (2150.88-2285.58)
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon, Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2410 (2386.63-2623.64)
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673, Intel Core i7-12650H, Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1339 (1313.59-1376.89)
Minisforum NUCX i7 Minisforum NUCXi7, Intel Core i7-11800H, Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1825 (1783.96-2050.55)
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, Intel Core i7-11800H, Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1562 (1536.63-1683.86)
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060, Intel Core i9-12900, Intel Core i9-12900: Ø2592 (2433.39-3346.44)
Intel Beast Canyon NUC Intel NUC 11 Extreme Kit – Beast Canyon, Intel Core i9-11900KB, Intel Core i9-11900KB: Ø1800 (1776.75-1859.25)
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C), Intel Core i7-10700, Intel Core i7-10700: Ø1338 (1184.66-1454.54)
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中，尽管功耗有限，Acemagic Tank03 仍能达到相对可接受的数值。另一方面，Crossmark 要求更高的 CPU 性能，这带来了负面影响，导致我们的测试设备排名最后。正如我们在 AIDA64 基准测试中看到的那样，为 Tank03 配备 DDR5 内存是一个正确的决定。我们的测试机能以明显的优势名列前茅，甚至连 Minisforum HX77G也能以约 20 个百分点的优势超越。
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=26) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 70620, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=26) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 71285, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=26) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 154.6, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=25) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在使用 Microsoft Edge 打开多个浏览器标签页时，Acemagic Tank03 已经出现了明显的延迟现象。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时，iGPU 的使用率和加载率高达约 25%。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
我们的 Acemagic 测试机配备了来自 BiWin 的 1,024GB SSD。固态硬盘支持 PCIe 3.0 速度，基准测试也证实了这一点。在直接对比中，我们的测试机在与竞争对手的竞争中遇到了一些困难。固态硬盘的摆放位置也不尽人意，因为我们发现在持续负载的情况下性能会明显下降。侧面的盖子下面几乎没有空气流通，而这本来可以帮助固态硬盘散热。Tank03 共可安装两个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘。
BiWin CE480V6D10H-1TB
Sequential Read:
1502 MB/s
Sequential Write:
435.6 MB/s
512K Read:
1019 MB/s
512K Write:
445.1 MB/s
4K Read:
49.98 MB/s
4K Write:
245.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
559.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
342.4 MB/s
| Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance), Acemagic Tank03, BiWin CE480V6D10H-1TB | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto), Acemagic Tank03, | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent), Acemagic Tank03, | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G Neptune Series HX77G, Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon, Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS500G | Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673, Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Minisforum NUCX i7 Minisforum NUCXi7, Minisforum NUCX i7, | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S | Intel Beast Canyon NUC Intel NUC 11 Extreme Kit – Beast Canyon, Intel Beast Canyon NUC, Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB | Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C), Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C), Phison 512GB PA6620060U | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Performance Rating | |||||||||||
| Percent | 42.3 | 53.8 27% | 53.5 26% | 82.8 96% | 95.5 126% | 76.7 81% | 40.1 -5% | 45.9 9% | 69.9 65% | 47.2 12% | 48.2 14% |
| DiskSpd | 1% | -1% | 137% | 174% | 87% | -1% | 9% | 29% | -4% | 19% | |
| seq read | 2241 | 2260 1% | 2130 -5% | 2572 15% | 3630 62% | 3266 46% | 1620 -28% | 2008 -10% | 1936 -14% | 824 -63% | 2030 ? -9% |
| seq write | 2770 | 2761 0% | 2674 -3% | 3553 28% | 3870 40% | 3385 22% | 1707 -38% | 1701 -39% | 1744 -37% | 665 -76% | 2052 ? -26% |
| seq q8 t1 read | 3393 | 3406 0% | 3088 -9% | 4822 42% | 7038 107% | 4810 42% | 2308 -32% | 2599 -23% | 4996 47% | 2635 -22% | 3172 ? -7% |
| seq q8 t1 write | 2851 | 2841 0% | 2744 -4% | 3545 24% | 3876 36% | 3368 18% | 1843 -35% | 1988 -30% | 2524 -11% | 2002 -30% | 2233 ? -22% |
| 4k q1 t1 read | 50.6 | 51 1% | 49.9 -1% | 70.2 39% | 86.6 71% | 81.7 61% | 38.9 -23% | 68.2 35% | 45.7 -10% | 42.2 -17% | 51.5 ? 2% |
| 4k q1 t1 write | 232 | 232 0% | 235 1% | 277 19% | 347 50% | 375 62% | 187.4 -19% | 251 8% | 320 38% | 120 -48% | 185.7 ? -20% |
| 4k q32 t16 read | 655 | 694 6% | 759 16% | 1944 197% | 1948 197% | 1938 196% | 786 20% | 656 0% | 970 48% | 1311 100% | 1092 ? 67% |
| 4k q32 t16 write | 411 | 418 2% | 416 1% | 3402 728% | 3830 832% | 1425 247% | 1032 151% | 933 127% | 1119 172% | 937 128% | 1088 ? 165% |
| AS SSD | 64% | 65% | 165% | 214% | 122% | 24% | 14% | 147% | 81% | 46% | |
| Score Total | 2266 | 4302 90% | 4276 89% | 6881 204% | 8314 267% | 5890 160% | 1054.23 -53% | 2237 -1% | 6467 185% | 4893 116% | 3560 ? 57% |
| Score Read | 974 | 1791 84% | 1777 82% | 2371 143% | 2781 186% | 2316 138% | 895 -8% | 824 -15% | 2462 153% | 1911 96% | 1354 ? 39% |
| Score Write | 805 | 1590 98% | 1584 97% | 3324 313% | 4185 420% | 2420 201% | 1556 93% | 1022 27% | 2827 251% | 2041 154% | 1564 ? 94% |
| Seq Read | 2888 | 2982.4 3% | 2977 3% | 4152 44% | 5339 85% | 4096 42% | 1613 -44% | 2822 -2% | 4274 48% | 2361 -18% | 2820 ? -2% |
| Seq Write | 2368 | 2780.85 17% | 2765 17% | 3272 38% | 3480 47% | 2994 26% | 1468 -38% | 2044 -14% | 2382 1% | 1690 -29% | 1970 ? -17% |
| 4K Read | 52.4 | 72.46 38% | 74.8 43% | 87 66% | 99.7 90% | 101.8 94% | 54.25 4% | 37.9 -28% | 83.9 60% | 38.25 -27% | 55.5 ? 6% |
| 4K Write | 193.9 | 174.32 -10% | 164.4 -15% | 246 27% | 239 23% | 305 57% | 129.81 -33% | 173.69 -10% | 308.4 59% | 100.2 -48% | 168.3 ? -13% |
| 4K-64 Read | 633 | 1419.98 124% | 1404 122% | 1869 195% | 2148 239% | 1805 185% | 679.23 7% | 503.52 -20% | 1950 208% | 1637 159% | 1016 ? 61% |
| 4K-64 Write | 374 | 1137.84 204% | 1143 206% | 2750 635% | 3598 862% | 1815 385% | 1279.71 242% | 643.35 72% | 2281 510% | 1772 374% | 1199 ? 221% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.143 | 0.13 9% | 0.113 21% | 0.049 66% | 0.085 41% | 0.192 -34% | 0.092 36% | 0.063 56% | 0.071 50% | 0.099 31% | 0.1025 ? 28% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.201 | 0.098 51% | 0.098 51% | 0.031 85% | 0.017 92% | 0.031 85% | 0.079 61% | 0.027 87% | 0.012 94% | 0.035 83% | 0.1297 ? 35% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 31% /
37% | 30% /
37% | 133% /
150% | 171% /
194% | 97% /
106% | 6% /
13% | 11% /
11% | 80% /
96% | 30% /
44% | 26% /
34% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Acemagic Tank03 BiWin CE480V6D10H-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2763 (386.86-3127.27)
Acemagic Tank03 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3319 (3021.96-3351.04)
Acemagic Tank03 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2334 (253.34-2775.37)
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0: Ø3367 (1610.33-4824.5)
Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS500G: Ø7000 (6488.14-7039.72)
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0: Ø4806 (4536.35-4816.74)
Minisforum NUCX i7 : Ø2309 (2137.76-2318.4)
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S: Ø2440 (1786.98-2501.9)
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S: Ø3896 (225.06-5002.7)
Intel Beast Canyon NUC Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB: Ø3896 (225.06-5002.7)
图形卡
我们的 Acemagic Tank03 测试设备使用了 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU.基本上，您应该了解移动显卡的功率限制在 80 瓦到 150 瓦之间。因此，如果我们只看各种设备的规格，是无法做出任何概括性说明的。Acemagic 允许功耗高达 115 瓦的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU.在与 Minisforum 的直接竞争对手 (NUCXi7在与 Minisforum 的直接竞争对手（NUCXi7）的比较中，Tank03 无法以更好的性能说服我们。Zotac 还能用 Magnus EN173070C.我们本以为会有更好的结果，因为考虑到散热系统，Tank03 也应该能够管理 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU 的更高功耗。移动GeForce RTX 3080 在 Tank03 上的最大优势是大容量 VRAM。制造商提供了 16 GB 的 GDDR6，而基于移动GeForce RTX 3070 的竞争对手只能使用 8 GB 的 GDDR6。
您可以在 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 上找到更多基准测试。 的其他基准测试.
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) | |
| ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Performance) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Auto) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Silent) | |
| Minisforum NUCXi7 | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| Intel NUC 11 Extreme Kit – Beast Canyon | |
| Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Auto) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Performance) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Silent) | |
| ZBOX Magnus EN173070C | |
| Minisforum NUCXi7 | |
| Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
| Intel NUC 11 Extreme Kit – Beast Canyon | |
| Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | ComputeMark v2.1 | Affinity Photo 2 | Premiere Pro PugetBench | Photoshop PugetBench
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Performance) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Auto) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Silent) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon | |
| Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
| Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Performance) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Auto) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 (Silent) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon | |
| Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G Neptune Series HX77G, R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon, i7-12700H, A770M | Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673, i7-12650H, A730M | Minisforum NUCX i7 Minisforum NUCXi7, i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Rating | |||||||||
| Percent | 25.8 | 26 1% | 25.4 -2% | 33.8 31% | 18.7 -28% | 15.8 -39% | 25.1 -3% | 25.9 0% | 10.6 -59% |
| SPECviewperf 12 | |||||||||
| 1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 217 | 219 1% | 214 -1% | 246 13% | 150 -31% | 121 -44% | 230 6% | 233 7% | 71 ? -67% |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 111 | 113 2% | 112 1% | 248 123% | 144 30% | 130 17% | 108 -3% | 115 4% | 62.6 ? -44% |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 62.5 | 62.8 0% | 61 -2% | 109 74% | 37.7 -40% | 37 -41% | 55.4 -11% | 59 -6% | 34.7 ? -44% |
| 1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 31.3 | 2.13 | 1.84 | 12.1 | 12.8 | 13 ? | |||
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 183 | 184 1% | 164 -10% | 198 8% | 136 -26% | 127 -31% | 199 9% | 212 16% | 61 ? -67% |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 97.6 | 40.4 | 35.3 | 55.7 | 57.2 | 26.2 ? | |||
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 125 | 125 0% | 122 -2% | 120 -4% | 104 -17% | 81.4 -35% | 138 10% | 136 9% | 34.9 ? -72% |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 75.3 | 76.4 1% | 69.8 -7% | 214 184% | 61.1 -19% | 58.8 -22% | 68.6 -9% | 79.4 5% | 69.7 ? -7% |
| SPECviewperf 13 | |||||||||
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 215 | 215 0% | 216 0% | 246 14% | 149 -31% | 122 -43% | 233 8% | 235 9% | 70.9 ? -67% |
| Catia (catia-05) | 159 | 159 0% | 159 0% | 381 140% | 211 33% | 194 22% | 155 -3% | 163 3% | 91.5 ? -42% |
| Creo (creo-02) | 215 | 216 0% | 216 0% | 273 27% | 77.6 -64% | 72.9 -66% | 215 0% | 225 5% | 70.1 ? -67% |
| Energy (energy-02) | 24.6 | 24.6 0% | 24.6 0% | 41.8 70% | 19.2 -22% | 8.06 -67% | 24.5 0% | 25.5 4% | 17.7 ? -28% |
| Maya (maya-05) | 304 | 310 2% | 311 2% | 340 12% | 281 -8% | 230 -24% | 333 10% | 337 11% | 94.7 ? -69% |
| Medical (medical-02) | 58.9 | 58.9 0% | 59 0% | 130 121% | 70.4 20% | 61.1 4% | 67.2 14% | 69.5 18% | 33 ? -44% |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | 120 | 120 0% | 120 0% | 121 1% | 105 -12% | 83 -31% | 138 15% | 135 13% | 34.5 ? -71% |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | 98.6 | 102 3% | 101 2% | 201 104% | 66.2 -33% | 63.8 -35% | 104 5% | 111 13% | 74.4 ? -25% |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | |||||||||
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 10.4 | 10.5 1% | 10.5 1% | 20.7 99% | 15.6 50% | 11.9 14% | 10.8 4% | 11 6% | 7.2 ? -31% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 186 | 186 0% | 189 2% | 162 -13% | 149 -20% | 125 -33% | 206 11% | 210 13% | 57.9 ? -69% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 29.6 | 29.6 0% | 29.5 0% | 19.1 -35% | 14.1 -52% | 17.2 -42% | 20.1 -32% | 19.7 -33% | 11 ? -63% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 76.8 | 78.5 2% | 75.7 -1% | 88.4 15% | 45.5 -41% | 41.7 -46% | 75.5 -2% | 78.3 2% | 29.8 ? -61% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 38 | 38.1 0% | 37.7 -1% | 55.1 45% | 36 -5% | 26.4 -31% | 36.4 -4% | 37 -3% | 19 ? -50% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 86.8 | 87.5 1% | 87 0% | 42.5 -51% | 40.1 -54% | 25.8 -70% | 72.1 -17% | 76.4 -12% | 21.4 ? -75% |
3DMark Results - Acemagic Tank03 (Performance)
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 57262 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 44856 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 81653 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 30079 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 81732 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 43765 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22794 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 12489 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10231 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
Acemagic Tank03 所使用的组件明显属于游戏 PC 的范畴，而这款小巧的电脑也绝对称得上是游戏 PC 中的佼佼者。尽管与Minisforum NUCXi7 的差距微乎其微，但还是可以超越竞争对手。Acemagic Tank03 只能在少数情况下受益于更大的 VRAM。在性能方面，如果你想达到平均每秒 60 帧的速度，你应该满足于当前游戏中的 1080p。不过，有时您也可以享受到更高分辨率的游戏。下表概述了使用 Acemagic Tank03 测试的所有游戏。
要了解所有测试游戏与其他机型相比的性能，请参阅我们的
GPU 游戏列表.Performance Rating | GTA V | Far Cry 5 | Far Cry New Dawn | F1 2020 | Strange Brigade | Borderlands 3 | Metro Exodus | F1 2021 | F1 22 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | God of War | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Callisto Protocol | Dead Space Remake | GRID Legends | A Plague Tale Requiem
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| F1 22 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| God of War - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| Dead Space Remake - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| GRID Legends - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| A Plague Tale Requiem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
| Acemagic Tank03 | |
| Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 181.7 | 179.4 | 172.2 | 111.1 | 96.3 | 98.2 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 400 | 313 | 196.4 | 102.4 | 79 | 69.4 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.4 | 152.6 | 147.4 | 138.7 | 117.1 | |||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 149 | 126 | 118 | 102 | 82 | 52 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 196 | 140.8 | 107.1 | 79.7 | 45 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 146.1 | 128.9 | 102.3 | 88 | ||||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 166 | 141 | 135 | 126 | 104 | 54 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 387 | 260 | 213 | 186.1 | 136.7 | 80.5 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 162.6 | 143.2 | 136.7 | 129.1 | 89.1 | 48.1 | ||
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 219 | 193 | 187 | 158 | 130 | 87 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 134 | 122 | 104 | 78 | 59 | 43 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 142 | 123 | 118 | 106 | 96 | 58 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 193 | 126.3 | 96.1 | 75.8 | 59.4 | 36.8 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 134.9 | 126 | 105.2 | 59 | 56.5 | 50 | ||
| Control (2019) | 239 | 124.7 | 91.3 | 58.2 | 29.1 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 158.7 | 135.2 | 109.2 | 90 | 64.4 | 36 | ||
| F1 2020 (2020) | 301 | 251 | 221 | 160.7 | 120.9 | 69.3 | ||
| Death Stranding (2020) | 167.9 | 146.5 | 141.5 | 138 | 107.4 | 59.6 | ||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 157 | 137 | 124 | 109 | 87 | 66 | 48 | |
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 112 | 110 | 97 | 75 | 56 | 33 | ||
| Dirt 5 (2020) | 205.8 | 152.4 | 123.4 | 95.2 | 77.5 | 49.6 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 162 | 115 | 96 | 84 | 65 | 39 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 344 | 280 | 235 | 123.7 | 90.4 | 51.5 | ||
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 148.8 | 126.5 | 111.9 | 104 | 78.2 | 44.9 | ||
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 138 | 138 | 137 | 135 | 103 | 56 | ||
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 207 | 149 | 136 | 84 | 71 | 49 | ||
| God of War (2022) | 131.7 | 112.3 | 91 | 65.3 | 55.6 | 37.6 | ||
| GRID Legends (2022) | 154.5 | 139.9 | 131 | 115.8 | 97.7 | 64.6 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 115.7 | 96.2 | 83.4 | 75.6 | 47.9 | 23 | ||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 161.9 | 154.6 | 152.9 | 147.8 | 94.8 | 47.1 | ||
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 205 | 167.9 | 113.2 | 88.3 | 62.9 | 34 | ||
| F1 22 (2022) | 247 | 245 | 195.4 | 65.2 | 42 | 20.1 | ||
| The Quarry (2022) | 152.5 | 116.8 | 96.6 | 77.9 | 54.3 | 29.8 | ||
| A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 113.7 | 87.2 | 64.3 | 49.1 | 35.8 | 20.3 | ||
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 82.7 | 80.4 | 75.9 | 73 | 57.2 | 32.1 | ||
| Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 123.7 | 118.2 | 109.8 | 101 | 79.6 | 63.9 | ||
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 149.2 | 127.9 | 121.4 | 83.6 | 63 | 38.9 | ||
| Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 146.1 | 133.8 | 110.8 | 109.6 | 79.3 | 43.2 | ||
| High On Life (2023) | 204 | 177.2 | 133 | 109.8 | 67 | 28.8 | ||
| The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 198.1 | 164.9 | 137.1 | 110 | 82.1 | 46.4 | ||
| Dead Space Remake (2023) | 88.6 | 85.6 | 74.7 | 73.6 | 51.1 | 26.7 | ||
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 113.3 | 101.2 | 76.5 | 68.4 | 48.2 | 26.3 | ||
| Returnal (2023) | 102 | 98 | 89 | 77 | 58 | 33 | ||
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 174.7 | 138.5 | 84.8 | 66.5 | 51 | 30.8 | ||
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 161.6 | 145 | 114.4 | 113.6 | 85.7 | 50.6 | ||
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 81.9 | 80.5 | 76.7 | 75.6 | 63.3 | 38.7 | ||
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 139.6 | 103.7 | 94.4 | 70.8 | 52.6 | 30.9 | ||
| The Last of Us (2023) | 99.4 | 82.8 | 75.6 | 64.8 | 43.4 | 33.7 | 20.9 | |
| Dead Island 2 (2023) | 187 | 178.4 | 158.2 | 123.3 | 85.7 | 43.8 | ||
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 83.5 | 73 | 68.1 | 65.3 | ||||
| Diablo 4 (2023) | 223 | 203 | 186.8 | 158.1 | 105.5 | 56.5 | ||
| F1 23 (2023) | 240 | 243 | 184.4 | 59.9 | 38.6 | 33 | 18.6 | |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 113.8 | 100.6 | 81.6 | 72.3 | 65.9 | 62.3 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 121 | 102.9 | 90.2 | 88.4 | 59.7 | 52.2 | 32 | |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 135.3 | 126.7 | 116.9 | 97 | 67.4 | 39.5 | ||
| Immortals of Aveum (2023) | 62.7 | 54.3 | 48.3 | 33.6 | 17.9 | |||
| Starfield (2023) | 75.4 | 62.6 | 51.7 | 46.9 | 37.6 | 23.4 | ||
| Lies of P (2023) | 173.4 | 151.1 | 130.6 | 117.9 | 78.3 | 63.4 | 41.3 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 117.9 | 99.8 | 86.3 | 74.4 | 45.8 | 20.8 | ||
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 225 | 213 | 186.5 | 127.6 | 105.6 | 60.9 | ||
| EA Sports FC 24 (2023) | 194.2 | 174.2 | 148.6 | 145.6 | 124.1 | 77.1 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 103 | 96 | 89 | 73 | 59 | 51 | 40 | |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 349.9 | 220.3 | 133.8 | 103.5 | 78.6 | 42.1 | ||
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 65.9 | 61.6 | 55.1 | 39.1 | 20 | |||
| EA Sports WRC (2023) | 125.1 | 95 | 87.6 | 81.1 | 61.2 | 50 | 35 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 134 | 119 | 94 | 93 | 89 | 67 | ||
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 75 | 70 | 60 | 46 | 30 | 26 | 15 | |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 147.8 | 138.2 | 120.5 | 82.3 | 82 | 38 | ||
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 333 | 307 | 300 | 256 | 176 | |||
| Palworld (2024) | 119.9 | 116.4 | 102.5 | 93.1 | 65.5 | 47.4 | 35.2 | |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 74 | 64.8 | 55.3 | 48.1 | 37.2 | 34.3 | 33.1 | 23.1 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 125.9 | 95.2 | 85.6 | 86.3 | 64.7 | 37.6 | ||
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 97 | 90 | 73 | 57 | 45 | 43 | 39 | 30 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 179.4 | 172.8 | 167.5 | 127.9 | 83 | 40.6 | ||
| Alone in the Dark (2024) | 165.1 | 157 | 155 | 103.2 | 50.7 | 40.3 | 55.9 | 20.2 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 100.7 | 93 | 62.7 | 62.6 | 47.9 | 40.8 | 38.8 | 28.9 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 61.5 | 60.8 | 53.6 | 40.7 | 36.7 | 32.1 |
排放物 - 性能卓越，清晰可闻
噪音水平
噪音测量结果显示，三种性能模式之间存在明显差异。在静音模式下，Acemagic Tank03 确实相当安静，即使在游戏时仍能达到 42.5 分贝（A）。在性能模式下，这款紧凑型游戏电脑的噪音短暂达到 53.1 dB(A)，明显高于竞争对手。噪音的最大来源是 CPU 风扇。在自动模式下，可以实现很好的折衷。虽然在最大 46 分贝（A）的情况下，设备的噪音仍然清晰可闻，但这并不令人讨厌。主观上，我们认为冷却专用显卡的风扇噪音更舒适。由于各种性能模式只对 CPU 功耗有影响，因此使用静音模式玩游戏也不会造成较大的性能损失。
Acemagic Tank03 - 性能
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.6 / 26.7 / 26.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47.3 / 53.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
Acemagic Tank03 - Auto
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.5 / 26.5 / 26.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.3 / 46 dB(A) |
|
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
王牌魔术坦克 03 - 无声
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.4 / 26.4 / 26.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.5 / 41.1 dB(A) |
|
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent), i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G Neptune Series HX77G, R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon Intel NUC 12 Kit - Serpent Canyon, i7-12700H, A770M | Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673, i7-12650H, A730M | Minisforum NUCX i7 Minisforum NUCXi7, i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C ZBOX Magnus EN173070C, i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060, i9-12900, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C), i7-10700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 10% | 7% | -10% | -3% | 1% | -11% | -10% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 30.3 -21% | 25.2 -1% | 29.5 -18% | 30.7 -23% | 30.2 -21% | 30 -20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26.6 | 26.5 -0% | 26.4 1% | 27.5 -3% | 31.8 -20% | 33 -24% | 29.5 -11% | 32.7 -23% | 30.2 -14% | 33.58 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 26.7 | 26.5 1% | 26.4 1% | 27.5 -3% | 31.9 -19% | 33.1 -24% | 29.5 -10% | 32.8 -23% | 30.4 -14% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 26.7 -0% | 26.5 1% | 27.5 -3% | 32 -20% | 33.1 -24% | 29.5 -10% | 32.8 -23% | 30.8 -15% | |
| Load Average * | 47.3 | 41.3 13% | 30.5 36% | 38.5 19% | 44.4 6% | 39.8 16% | 32.8 31% | 41.7 12% | 44.25 6% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.3 | 44.9 5% | 42.5 10% | 39.58 16% | 40.5 14% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 53.1 | 46 13% | 41.1 23% | 40.7 23% | 44.5 16% | 40.6 24% | 40.8 23% | 45.4 15% | 45.1 15% | 48.72 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Acemagic Tank03 的机箱在空载运行时甚至在负载情况下的温度都很低。我们在背面风扇通风口区域测得的温度略高，但仍在极限范围内。我们看到侧盖下方的温度明显更高。由于热量无法散发，内存、固态硬盘和 WLAN 模块都变得非常热。这也是固态硬盘在负载情况下性能下降的原因。在左侧，Acemagic 额外安装了一个小风扇，用于将工作内存的热量排出机箱。然而，这个小风扇并没有产生明显的气流，因此它的作用仍然值得怀疑。
在处理器本身，我们测得的最高温度为 96 °C（205 °F）。因此，SoC 的运行温度达到了英特尔为处理器规定的热极限。专用显卡的负载温度稍好一些，在压力测试期间，我们在NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU 只测出约 73 °C（163 °F），但热点温度略高于 80 °C（176 °F）。
Heat Distribution at the Top and Bottom - Performance mode
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.1 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 26 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 26 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
Acemagic Tank03 在空闲运行时效率并不高。不过，与采用专用英特尔图形处理器的两款竞争对手相比，我们仍然看到了明显的优势。在平均负载情况下，我们的测量设备仅显示 101 瓦，而在负载情况下，性能模式下的最大功耗略高于 250 瓦。不过，最大值并不是一直达到的，从表格下方的图表中就可以看出。巨大的电源最高可达到 300 瓦，在为 Acemagic Tank03 提供足够的电力方面从未出现过任何问题。
Acemagic Tank03 - 性能
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.98 / 2.8 Watt |
| Idle | 27.5 / 30.1 / 38.1 Watt |
| Load |
101 / 252 Watt |
   
| |
Acemagic Tank03 - Auto
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.98 / 2.8 Watt |
| Idle | 27.3 / 28.9 / 40 Watt |
| Load |
106.6 / 206 Watt |
|
| |
王牌魔术坦克 03 - 无声
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.98 / 2.8 Watt |
| Idle | 27.3 / 29.4 / 33.7 Watt |
| Load |
92.2 / 186.7 Watt |
|
| |
| Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Acemagic Tank03 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M | Intel NUC 12, NUC12SNKi72_Serpent Canyon i7-12700H, A770M | Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673 i7-12650H, A730M | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 10% | 30% | -30% | -33% | 7% | -29% | 13% | 60% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.5 | 27.3 1% | 27.3 1% | 16.5 40% | 28.8 -5% | 45.7 -66% | 28.2 -3% | 31.3 -14% | 19.6 ? 29% | 9.75 ? 65% |
| Idle Average * | 30.1 | 28.9 4% | 29.4 2% | 21.5 29% | 39.3 -31% | 47.5 -58% | 29.9 1% | 35.1 -17% | 24.1 ? 20% | 11.7 ? 61% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38.1 | 40 -5% | 33.7 12% | 24.4 36% | 57.1 -50% | 47.5 -25% | 36.2 5% | 41.6 -9% | 33.3 ? 13% | 14.7 ? 61% |
| Load Average * | 101 | 106.6 -6% | 92.2 9% | 77.2 24% | 158.7 -57% | 129.6 -28% | 83.2 18% | 214 -112% | 107.9 ? -7% | 51.9 ? 49% |
| Load Maximum * | 252 | 206 18% | 186.7 26% | 193.3 23% | 270.9 -8% | 226 10% | 215.7 14% | 231 8% | 230 ? 9% | 86 ? 66% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 167 | 193.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.7 (104.7-141.9)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø87.9 (81.2-106.4)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67 (62.3-82.3)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124 (121.7-129.8)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø98.6 (95.9-100.1)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø74.6 (69.7-79.7)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø164.8 (153.8-185)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø167.4 (156.1-206)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø168.2 (155.8-186.7)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø202 (198.1-207)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø185.6 (177-204)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø168.2 (158-173.5)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø32.3 (31-38.1)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø96.8 (94.3-98.6)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø32.5 (31.5-33.8)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø122.8 (118.1-126.3)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø99 (94.3-101.4)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.1 (35.9-81.3)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø67.7 (55.7-80.7)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø66.2 (57.7-81)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø55.7 (48.3-75.3)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø101.2 (83.3-126.9)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø87 (49.8-126.4)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø92.3 (81.2-104.3)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Performance); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø201 (129.4-252)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Auto); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø106.8 (101.3-111)
Acemagic Tank03 Acemagic Tank03 (Silent); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø89.2 (74-115.1)
Pros
+ 设计
+ 三种性能模式（静音、自动、高性能）
+ 良好的 CPU 性能
+ 32GB DDR5 内存
+ 两个维护挡板（仅用于内存、固态硬盘和无线局域网）
+ GeForce 配备 16GB VRAM 的 RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU
+ 适当的游戏性能
+ 多个外部连接
+ 2x 2.5 Gbit LAN
Cons
- 高 DPC 延迟
- 固态硬盘性能不稳定
- 专用 GPU 仅支持 115 瓦 BIOS
- Turbo 性能较低的 SoC
- 明显的 CPU 风扇（性能模式）
- 缓慢的 SD 读卡器
结论 - 表现出色，但浪费了一些潜力
Acemagic Tank03 是一款迷你 PC，作为游戏 PC，它的组件甚至可以流畅地玩最新的游戏。它采用英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H，由于使用了散热系统，因此无法充分发挥其潜能。在 3D 计算方面，它采用了 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU但也受限于保守的 TDP 设置。因此，Acemagic Tank03 在与 Minisforum NUCXi7 的竞争中遇到了一些困难。就我们测得的温度而言，制造商本可以为专用显卡提供更大的性能空间。但至少 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU在 Tank03 中配备了高容量的 16 GB VRAM。
Acemagic Tank03 是一款小巧的游戏电脑，具有不错的游戏性能。但由于价格不菲，Acemagic Tank03 可能仍然不会出现在你的购物卡中。
Acemagic Tank03 对得起它游戏电脑的标签，几乎可以让你在 1080p 下玩所有游戏。与此同时，您还必须注意到 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080 笔记本电脑 GPU已不再是最新的型号之一。这也意味着不支持 Nvidia 的帧生成。尽管做工不错，但在选材方面还无法与 Minisforum 的高品质机型相媲美。不过，基本上没有太多抱怨的理由。连接设备也不错，提供了足够数量的端口来连接外围设备。我们只在测试机的无线局域网模块上遇到了一些问题，但我们认为这不是普遍问题。换上另一个无线局域网模块后，问题就解决了。我们非常喜欢在运行时调整性能的选项。但遗憾的是，这只会影响处理器的性能。我们还是看到了性能模式之间的一些明显差异，而且选择模式对性能和噪音水平都有明显的影响。
遗憾的是，散热系统实施得并不完美，固态硬盘和工作内存的温度都很高。这导致固态硬盘在负载情况下性能下降。我们还不得不提到价格，因为 Acemagic Tank03 将近 2000 欧元（约合 2155 美元）的价格并不便宜。
价格和供应情况
Acemagic Tank03 可直接从制造商商店购买。虽然顶级型号目前无货，但 Tank03 的售价为 1399 美元（英特尔酷睿 i7-12700H、NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘）。
Acemagic Tank03
-
12/12/2023 v7
Sebastian Bade
Mini PC - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
