Notebookcheck Logo
The best Android tablet - Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

最好的Android 平板电脑并非来自三星--小米 Pad 7 Ultra 评测

改变小米游戏规则

14 英寸 Pad 7 Ultra 是一款超级平板电脑，抢尽了Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的风头。出色的 OLED 面板采用可选的磨砂表面，为手写笔移动使用提供了完美的条件。但是，新的 XRing O1 能跟上骁龙 8 精英的步伐吗？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Touchscreen Tablet Android

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 评测

小米新 SoC 的首次亮相令人印象深刻，如果考虑到谷歌在 Tensor 芯片上的努力，骁龙 8 Elite 的首次亮相并不一定在意料之中。这使得 Pad 7 Ultra 的速度明显快于Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra。但是，即使在 XRing O1 之外，小米的旗舰平板电脑也没有理由躲避三星和Apple 的同行--恰恰相反。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Pad 7 Ultra 做工精良，重量比 iPad Air 13 轻，但显示屏更大，电池容量更高。说到电池续航时间，小米平板电脑也给人留下了深刻印象。在我们的测试中，虽然 14 英寸 OLED 面板没有达到广告宣传的峰值亮度，但亮度仍然极具竞争力。再加上强大的校准和高频 PWM 调光功能，该屏幕几乎没有任何值得批评的地方。

对于一款高端设备来说，更新的可用性是一个重要的考虑因素，但由于小米方面缺乏相关信息，我们对 Pad 7 Ultra 产生了一些疑问。缺乏 5G 和 GNSS 选项，以及在中国以外地区的供应有限，也是必须考虑的主要缺点。

Pros

+ 高级外壳
+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 超长运行时间
+ 强大的 SoC
+ 高级一致性

Cons

- 没有更新承诺
- 功能集存在空白（无 IP 等级......）。
- 可用性有限
- 没有带全球导航卫星系统的 5G 选项

价格和供应情况

Pad 7 Ultra 已在中国上市，基本机型配备 12GB LPDDR5T 内存和 256GB UFS 4.1 存储空间，售价 5699 元（约合 795 美元）。顶级机型（16 GB、1 TB 存储空间）售价 7399 元（约合 1030 美元）。在深圳贸易公司，进口价格约为 1,010 美元。有关可能在国际市场上推出的详细信息仍未确定。

与 15S Pro智能手机的同时，小米还发布了新款旗舰平板电脑 Pad 7 Ultra。这款高端平板电脑采用了该公司最新的 XRing O1芯片组，这家中国制造商希望凭借该芯片组在高端市场一争高下。这使小米的 Ultra 机型成为三星 Tab S10 Ultra 的直接竞争对手。 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra或 Apple iPad Pro 13.

Pad 7 Ultra 配上铝键盘盖和单独提供的触控笔，可完全替代笔记本电脑。HyperOS 2 还提供了新的多任务优化功能。

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 规格

Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (Pad Series)
Processor
Xiaomi Xring O1 10 x 1.8 - 3.9 GHz, Cortex-X925, A725, A520
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5T
Display
14.00 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 275 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, touch rate up to 1.600 Hz, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 233 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.1 x 305.8 x 207.5
Battery
12000 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", Video 4K@60fps)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 19 mm, 1/3.6",FF, Video 1080p@30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, HyperOS 2 , 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
609 g
Price
870 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Android 平板电脑，边框纤薄

蓝色小米 Pad 7 Ultra
蓝色小米 Pad 7 Ultra

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 的优质外观以及金属和玻璃的高品质材料组合给人留下了深刻印象。边框由铝合金制成，使这款 XXL 平板电脑具有一定的坚固性。不过，它没有 IP 防护等级，这意味着它既不防水也不防尘。

显示屏由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护，确保了高耐用性，同时还提供纳米软涂层版本。表面结构采用蚀刻工艺，可减少反光并提供纸张般的书写手感。不过，我们的评测样品并没有这种防反射涂层。

小米平板电脑的屏占比高达 92%，感觉非常现代，这主要归功于功能完善的掌托。极窄的显示屏边框仅约 4 毫米。虽然使用凹槽有些争议，但它能有效利用空间，而无需在显示屏周围使用宽边框。顶部是一个磁性接触面，可以为小米 Focus 笔充电和配对。

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 非常纤薄，这也体现在它的重量上：这款 14 英寸平板电脑仅重 609 克，与重 100 克的 Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra.

尺寸比较

❌
326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.4 mm 718 g305.8 mm 207.5 mm 5.1 mm 609 g290.9 mm 188.3 mm 6.69 mm 640 g289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.1 mm 616 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 小米 Pad 7 Ultra 使用 USB 3.2

Pad 7 Ultra 配备了快速 USB 3.2（第 2 代）端口，最大数据传输速度可达 10 Gbps。该端口还支持有线视频输出。用户还可以通过红外线端口将小米平板电脑用作遥控器，使 Pad 7 Ultra 成为电视和其他设备的控制中心。

内置的 NFC 芯片允许在平板电脑和小米手机之间传输文件和照片。还可无线传输数据到Apple 产品。此外，Pad 7 Ultra 还可以通过 Miracast 作为 Windows 或 macOS 设备的第二屏幕。

背面的金属触点可作为选配键盘盖的连接元件。不过，需要注意的是，即使有了这个端口，也无法通过 microSD 卡扩展内存。USB OTG 可用于其他外部存储设备。

机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器、麦克风、扬声器）
机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器、麦克风、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器）
机壳顶侧（麦克风、音量按钮、麦克风）
机壳顶侧（麦克风、音量按钮、麦克风）

软件 - 小米平板电脑配备Android 15

Pad 7 Ultra 预装了Android 15，在此基础上，制造商运行自己的 HyperOS 2.0 用户界面。在测试时，安全补丁是最新的（截至 2025 年 4 月），但官方没有透露这款高级平板电脑将在多长时间内接受更新。

HyperOS 2 采用类似桌面的系统界面和公司专有的人工智能，但在德语国家几乎无法使用。谷歌的 "搜索圈"（Circle to Search）功能在全球设备上都找不到。虽然已经预装了谷歌框架，但开箱即不支持谷歌服务。这使得用户可以通过该公司自己的应用商店手动安装 Play Store。不过，除中文和英文外，无法选择德语语言包。

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测

可持续性

小米尚未提供有关所用材料及其回收率的准确信息，但该制造商提供了一般性指导：小米致力于增加再生材料的使用。使用生物基高分子材料和再生塑料也是为了尽量减少生态足迹。

包装似乎是无塑料的，设备本身是用纸包装的。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Android 平板电脑缺乏 5G 功能

在家庭网络环境中，Pad 7 Ultra 使用快速 WiFi 7 标准，但只使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段建立连接。使用我们的 WiFi 6E 路由器，在不使用 6 GHz 频段的情况下，我们仍然取得了超过 1,500 Mbps 的惊人传输速度。总的来说，华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的通信速度并不稳定。

正如在 Pad 7和 Pad 7 Pro和 Pad 7 Pro 的情况一样，小米的高端平板电脑不提供使用移动数据或通过卫星系统定位设备的选项，这让人有些失望。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
741 (min: 557) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1487 (min: 1246) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1598 (min: 1108) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
960 (min: 700) MBit/s ∼52%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
941 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 1014) MBit/s ∼76%
Global Average -3
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
979 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1061 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1362 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1455 (min: 390) MBit/s ∼79%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
548 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
572 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1226 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1400 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼76%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1888 (1860-1922)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1809 (940-1895)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra  ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø741 (557-928)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (496-1009)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra  ; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1487 (1246-1616)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (909-991)

摄像头 - 小米 Pad 7 Ultra 使用三星传感器

与 Pad 7 Ultra 自拍
与 Pad 7 Ultra 自拍

在设备正面，小米为其高端平板电脑配备了 3200 万像素超广角镜头。Omnivision (OV32D) 传感器采用像素融合技术，仅限于 1080p 拍摄。Pad 7 Ultra 的 3200 万像素图像坚若磐石，细节相当丰富。机身背面是一个 5000 万像素自动对焦传感器。三星 JN1 支持 4K60 视频，并能拍摄出质量上乘的照片，与旗舰手机（如 iPhone 16 Pro三星 JN1 支持 4K60 视频，并能拍摄出质量上乘的照片，与 iPhone 16 Pro 等旗舰手机相比具有惊人的竞争力。

使用小米平板电脑数字化笔记或文档非常简单。由于 Pad 7 Ultra 体积庞大，几乎没有人会想将ƒ/1.8 光圈用于其他用途。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
0 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra: 4.87 ∆E min: 0 - max: 8.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
91 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra: 46.87 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 90.97 ∆E

配件和保修 -Android 平板电脑配有充电器

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 的键盘盖
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 的键盘盖

包装包括一个 120 瓦快速充电电源适配器、一条数据/充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）和一本快速入门指南。我们的贷方深圳贸易公司还扩大了中国版的供货范围，为充电器提供了欧盟适配器和 USB OTG 适配器。Pad 7 Ultra 的可选配件包括 Focus Pen（约 100 美元）和键盘盖。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月 保修.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑配备了指纹传感器

Pad 7 Ultra 的电容式多点触摸屏在所有区域都非常精确。输入处理无延迟，采样率高达 1,600 Hz。不过，手指触摸默认使用 240 Hz。

除了手指操作外，你还可以使用 15 克重的小米 Focus 触控笔，它可提供 8,192 级压力。高达 120 Hz 的刷新率可确保图像流畅运行，即使是 3K 分辨率也不例外。值得一提的是，小米在 Ultra 机型上安装了振动电机（Z 轴）。

采用的 3:2 格式更接近经典的纸张格式，而不是平板电脑的 16:10 格式，如 Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra更适合阅读电子书或 PDF 文件。由于增加了垂直空间，更高的纵横比还可以在浏览器中显示更多内容。

主动式指纹传感器位于平板电脑左侧的电源按钮上。食指可轻松触及传感器区域。解锁可靠而快速。还可通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别。

小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Ultra 平板电脑评测

显示屏 - XXL 平板电脑使用 OLED 面板

子像素排列
子像素排列

显示屏的技术指标非常出色。2,136p 的面板对角线长达 14 英寸，使 Pad 7 Ultra 的像素密度达到了令人满意的 275 PPI，尽管这还没有达到神奇的 300 PPI 上限。刷新率为 60 和 120 Hz。我们更希望采用采用 LTPO 技术的 AMOLED，但面板制造商三星和其他公司可能还没有提供这种尺寸的面板。

在亮度方面，小米承诺可达到 1,600 尼特，但在我们的测试中并未实现。在全屏白色显示的情况下，我们测得的亮度为 566 cd/m²。缩小白色区域（APL18）的峰值亮度为 802 cd/m²，不过在播放 HDR 视频时，OLED 通常还有一定的提升空间。

相比之下 OPPO Pad 4 Pro相比，Pad 7 Ultra 采用了 PWM 技术。不过，根据制造商的说法，所实现的 PWM 调光以 4800 Hz 的极高频率运行。这使得小米平板电脑比 Galaxy 平板电脑 S10 Ultra.我们测得的基线闪烁频率为 120 Hz。

562
cd/m²		548
cd/m²		523
cd/m²
548
cd/m²		566
cd/m²		559
cd/m²
512
cd/m²		503
cd/m²		536
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 566 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 539.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x2136, 14"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Screen
-69%
-78%
-106%
-39%
Brightness middle
566
605
7%
672
19%
726
28%
607
7%
Brightness
540
603
12%
652
21%
691
28%
576
7%
Brightness Distribution
89
98
10%
93
4%
91
2%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.46
0.55
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.91
2.6
-186%
3.18
-249%
4.67
-413%
1.52
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.59
5.4
-240%
4.84
-204%
5.6
-252%
3.5
-120%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
2.2
-57%
1.8
-29%
2.2
-57%
Gamma
2.251 98%
2.08 106%
2.396 92%
2.249 98%
2.197 100%
CCT
6703 97%
6405 101%
7070 92%
6382 102%
6929 94%
Contrast
1461
1320
1214

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.8 Hz
Amplitude: 30 %

The display backlight flickers at 119.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.8 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

12 位面板提供 HDR 10+、HDR Vivid，甚至杜比视界，还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证。

色彩显示设置也很丰富。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。我们使用Original Pro配置文件实现了最精确的色彩还原。在这里，与参考色几乎没有明显的差异。

色彩准确度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

在户外，小米 Ultra 机型的表现非常出色。购买了防反射显示屏玻璃的用户不会遇到任何反光问题。不过，我们这款采用亮面屏幕的手机亮度有限。

在广视角下，我们没有发现任何色彩变化，而且视角稳定性整体上非常好。

性能 -Android 平板电脑配备小米 SoC

Pad 7 Ultra 所搭载的 SoC 是一款令人兴奋的 3 纳米 ARM 芯片，共有 10 个处理器内核，其中包括两个 Cortex X925 Prime 处理单元（主频：3.7 GHz）。 XRing O1的单核心性能明显优于 Dimensity 9400.这并不奇怪，因为联发科只使用一个 Cortex X925 内核。

鉴于谷歌在其 Tensor SoC.与 骁龙 8 精英相比 XRing O1不仅在 Geekbench CPU 测试中表现出色，而且在人工智能测试中也不遑多让。 Dimensity 9400表现更佳。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3188 Points +17%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2994 Points +10%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2718 - 2985, n=2)
2852 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2718 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2192 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=92, last 2 years)
1230 Points -55%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11752 Points +29%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9218 Points +1%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (9097 - 9250, n=2)
9174 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
9097 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7327 Points -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=92, last 2 years)
3916 Points -57%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2854581 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2599957 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2487133 - 2599957, n=2)
2543545 Points -2%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2147386 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2033124 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1891925 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=56, last 2 years)
931372 Points -64%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16743 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
16503 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (15446 - 16503, n=2)
15975 Points -3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14862 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=82, last 2 years)
10923 Points -34%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2155 - 2276, n=2)
2216 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2155 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1431 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1367 Points -37%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1172 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=69, last 2 years)
843 Points -61%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11721 Points +3%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (11376 - 11988, n=2)
11682 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
11376 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10865 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=67, last 2 years)
4858 Points -57%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16435 Points +7%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (15399 - 15799, n=2)
15599 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
15399 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15124 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
7972 Points -48%
Memory
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (17036 - 20652, n=2)
18844 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
17036 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points -31%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11132 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10000 Points -41%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5696 Points -67%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
56004 Points +99%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42342 Points +51%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points +20%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (28099 - 28402, n=2)
28251 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
28099 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
11405 Points -59%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2273 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2232 - 2273, n=2)
2253 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2051 Points -10%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2007 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1369 Points -40%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74437 Points +222%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
23087 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (21087 - 23087, n=2)
22087 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points -22%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17934 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years)
12119 Points -48%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
55794 Points +2573%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=57, last 2 years)
6674 Points +220%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
2087 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1982 - 2087, n=2)
2035 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1458 Points -30%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1236 Points -41%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
1698 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1678 - 1698, n=2)
1688 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=14, last 2 years)
1185 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1108 Points -35%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
589 Points -65%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=14, last 2 years)
887 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
762 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (715 - 762, n=2)
739 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -37%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
278 Points -64%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
765 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (722 - 765, n=2)
744 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=14, last 2 years)
419 Points -45%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
298 Points -61%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8305 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3377 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)
1944 Points
Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12784 Points +1992%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7341 Points +1101%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=13, last 2 years)
2401 Points +293%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (611 - 668, n=2)
640 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 12288
611 Points

图形芯片采用 16 核 Immortalis G925.与 Dimensity 9400的直接对比可以看出 XRing 01由于多了四个内核，因此速度也更快。但是，与 Adreno 830的 OPPO Pad 4 Pro时，Pad 7 Ultra 的定位非常准确。在 4K High Tier 测试中，高达 55fps 的速度是一项相当不错的成绩，即将上市的Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 也将不负众望。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6546 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5527 Points -16%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5145 Points -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
7031 Points +8%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6509 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21789 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18628 Points -15%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11992 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9983 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
9843 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8402 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4769 Points -52%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11932 Points +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
11435 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8498 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4808 Points -52%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2601 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2595 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
1938 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1917 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
935 Points -64%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2634 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2517 Points -4%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2060 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1920 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
948 Points -64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
866 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
809 fps -7%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -18%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
500 fps -42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
494 fps +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
411 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
347 fps -16%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
334 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -31%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
230 fps -31%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -18%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
57 fps -21%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
204 fps +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
182 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
171 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -16%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps -19%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
51 fps -24%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -22%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
71 fps -38%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
98 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -39%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -39%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
287 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps -27%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
205 fps -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps -42%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
55 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps -22%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
32 fps -42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -45%

在浏览器性能方面，Pad 7 Ultra 表现出色，但不得不承认输给了 Apple iPad Air 13.

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (256 - 265, n=2)
261 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
256 Points
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=13, last 2 years)
221 Points -14%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
33.9 runs/min +101%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (Chrome 137)
16.9 runs/min
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
16.5 runs/min -2%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (14.5 - 16.9, n=2)
15.7 runs/min -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
14.8 runs/min -12%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=46, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min -18%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (Chrome 137)
198 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (196 - 198, n=2)
197 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
193 Points -3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=77, last 2 years)
120.1 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
93681 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (Chrome 137)
81322 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (81076 - 81322, n=2)
81199 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
71054 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points -14%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=100, last 2 years)
35443 Points -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=86, last 2 years)
3173 ms * -476%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms * -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
632.4 ms * -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (Chrome 137)
551.34 ms *
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (502 - 551, n=2)
527 ms * +4%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
322.8 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

借助现代 UFS 4.1 存储系统，小米平板电脑的定位非常准确，尤其是在读写小数据块时。

Xiaomi Pad 7 UltraSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraOppo Pad 4 ProLenovo Yoga Tab PlusAverage 256 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-19%
-26%
0%
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
3782.3
3912.45
3%
3801.54
1%
3868
2%
3782 ?(n=1)
0%
1326 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=82, last 2 years)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
3098.21
2963.58
-4%
3334.62
8%
3047.6
-2%
3098 ?(n=1)
0%
936 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=82, last 2 years)
-70%
Random Read 4KB
445.76
342.97
-23%
297.28
-33%
241.2
-46%
446 ?(n=1)
0%
210 ?(20.1 - 474, n=82, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Write 4KB
667.18
554.76
-17%
335.89
-50%
290.9
-56%
667 ?(n=1)
0%
216 ?(8.23 - 668, n=82, last 2 years)
-68%

游戏 - 小米 Pad 采用光线追踪技术

我们使用GameBench应用程序来了解这款高级平板电脑及其 Immortalis G925是否也适合 HFR 游戏：在最高图形设置下，《源氏冲击》等高要求游戏在 14 英寸 3.2K 屏幕上以稳定的 60fps 显示--这是目前Android 上这款游戏的最高帧率。

但在《PUBG Mobile》中，我们只能获得 60fps 的帧率，小米平板电脑不支持该射击游戏的 120fps 选项。不过，像《死亡扳机》这样的老游戏却能达到原生帧率，平均帧率为 120fps。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra; Dead Trigger 2: Ø119.6 (115-121)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra; Genshin Impact: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (45-61)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (57-61)

排放 -Android 平板电脑非常凉爽

温度

Pad 7 Ultra 的发热问题较少。机箱的大表面积意味着即使在负载情况下，温度也几乎不明显。

在稳定性方面，这也是一个巨大的优势。 XRing O1在 3DMark 压力测试中几乎不影响性能。高负载下的帧速率仅降低了约 8%，但小米也没有为其 XXL 平板电脑选择额外的性能模式，这与 15S Pro.

Max. Load
 33.5 °C41.2 °C42.5 °C 
 31.3 °C35.2 °C35 °C 
 31 °C30.7 °C31.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
36.4 °C42.2 °C44.5 °C
33.1 °C37.1 °C36 °C
31.7 °C33.1 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92.3 %
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.5 %
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.6 % -5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 % -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -23%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
98.7 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % -7%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.4 % -10%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.7 % -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 % -20%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
99.4 %
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 % -7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.6 % -13%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.1 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.7 % -19%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø37.6 (36.4-38.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25.5 (23.3-32.6)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø107 (102.7-111.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø79.1 (73.6-101.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø98.7 (86.9-111.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø23.4 (21.7-29.1)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø34.8 (34.6-35.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.3 (22.3-28.3)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.5 (11.6-14.4)

发言人

Pad 7 Ultra 的立体声扬声器系统位于机身两侧，具有四个低音单元和四个高音单元。我们的测量结果显示，小米平板电脑的中高音频率响应类似波浪。不过，混音中的低音还是很明显的。

要通过无线或有线耳机获得音频体验，这款高级平板电脑使用蓝牙 5.4 和 USB-C 端口，没有配备 3.5 毫米插孔。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.838.62535.5303130.325.24037.227.65032.634.36318.246.38018.351.510021.158.212518.662.21601665.120016.266.125018.366.731517.872.140014.267.350014.970.363018.87480020.374.1100016.881.2125014.881.816001778.220001473.9250012.677.331501275.4400011.866.150001263.1630012.165.280001267.4100001268.61250011.875.21600011.473.4SPL27.188N0.973median 14.8median 72.1Delta34.449.352.141.741.332.2333335.236.540.123.933.119.741.420.747.51953.22156.119.861.518.462.319.56518.563.419.371.223.276.223.876.921.176.618.977.320.775.220.772.317.871.117.567.618.164.323.271.520.275.123.671.417.86818.866.518.468.732.985.51.866.4median 19.5median 68.71.54.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 7 UltraOppo Pad 4 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Pad 4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 小米 Pad 7 Ultra 的充电功率为 120 瓦。

耗电量

集成电池容量为 12,000 mAh，充电速度非常快，最高可达 120 瓦。不过，如果您赶时间，就需要激活 "增强模式"，以确保快速充满电。

在我们的测试中，我们花了大约 75 分钟才给 Pad 7 Ultra 充满电。如果不想使用随附的 CN HyperCharge 电源适配器，也可以使用普通的 PD3.0 快速充电协议。

虽然不支持无线充电，但可以使用 7.5 瓦的有线反向充电。

负载情况 XRing O1 的功耗似乎介于不起眼和有点高之间，特别是考虑到 OPPO Pad 4 Pro.空载时的功耗接近 5 瓦，仍有优化的余地。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.5 / 4.8 / 5.2 Watt
Load midlight 11.9 / 15.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
12000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh		Average Xiaomi Xring O1
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
3%
53%
35%
-18%
31%
27%
Idle Minimum *
4.5
3.34
26%
1.5
67%
1.5
67%
2.1
53%
2.65 ?(0.8 - 4.5, n=2)
41%
1.828 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=77, last 2 years)
59%
Idle Average *
4.8
5
-4%
1.8
62%
1.8
62%
8.3
-73%
3.1 ?(1.4 - 4.8, n=2)
35%
3.77 ?(1 - 9.2, n=77, last 2 years)
21%
Idle Maximum *
5.2
5.11
2%
2.2
58%
2.3
56%
8.5
-63%
3.45 ?(1.7 - 5.2, n=2)
34%
4.25 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=77, last 2 years)
18%
Load Average *
11.9
12.77
-7%
5.8
51%
11.1
7%
11.9
-0%
9.1 ?(6.3 - 11.9, n=2)
24%
9.45 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years)
21%
Load Maximum *
15.7
15.94
-2%
11.4
27%
18.5
-18%
16.9
-8%
12.4 ?(9.1 - 15.7, n=2)
21%
13.3 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=77, last 2 years)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Xiaomi Xring O1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø15.4 (13.8-15.6)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.09 (3.65-11.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.26 (4.95-5.59)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Xiaomi Xring O1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.5 (15.5-15.5)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.8-11.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.26 (4.95-5.59)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

电池寿命

在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，该储能设备在 Wi-Fi 测试中的续航时间超过 21 小时，在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下连续播放视频的续航时间接近 22 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 34min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
21h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 44min
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
12000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh
Battery Runtime
-36%
22%
-18%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1474
935
-37%
2589
76%
1422
-4%
1529
4%
H.264
1305
721
-45%
1287
-1%
998
-24%
829
-36%
WiFi v1.3
1281
585
-54%
1077
-16%
768
-40%
794
-38%
Load
224
207
-8%
292
30%
219
-2%
298
33%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米的新旗舰是目前市场上最好的Android 平板电脑，这部分归功于它自己的 SoC。

不过，你必须接受中国版本的限制。

Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra - 06/23/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 74%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
57 / 65 → 87%
Application Performance
79 / 92 → 86%
AI Performance
47%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 94%
Camera
70 / 90 → 77%
Average
67%
90%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
92.2%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 44.5%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 最好的Android 平板电脑并非来自三星--小米 Pad 7 Ultra 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-06-27 (Update: 2025-06-27)