关于一加平板 4 的总结
一加正逐步退出欧美市场，但它为我们留下了Pad 4这一精美的临别礼物： 这款大尺寸平板性能强劲，电池续航持久，屏幕亮度高且无PWM闪烁，网络速度快，支持快充，而且——理论上——配件也很出色，不过遗憾的是这些配件很难买到。
其软件操作非常直观，非常适合多任务处理以及与其他设备连接。纤薄且做工精良的机身外观吸引人，握持手感也很舒适。
令我们不太满意的是，一加并未承诺具体的软件支持期限。因此，你只能寄希望于几年后仍能收到安全更新。
扬声器的音量也可以再大一些；在如此宽大的机身内，完全有空间容纳真正出色的扬声器。 缺少指纹传感器这一点，与完全没有蜂窝网络选项一样令人费解。
不过总体而言，我们非常喜欢一加 Pad 4，因为它以合理的价格提供了强大的性能和高质量的用户体验。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
由于一加正在放缓其业务运营，在许多国家，一加平板 4 并不容易买到。
如果您找到零售商，合理的价格应在 650 至 750 美元左右。
规格
案例——纤薄、高品质，但易受压力影响
尽管配备了超过 13,000 mAh 的超大电池，一加 Pad 4 却依然是一款非常轻薄的平板电脑；不过，其 1.482 磅（675 克）的重量让人明显感觉到这块强劲电池的存在。 同类设备则轻得多。
这款平板的设计与我们近期评测过的Oppo Pad 5 Pro相同，不过提供了浅绿色和棕色两种配色。官方未提及 IP 防护等级，因此为安全起见，应避免平板接触灰尘和水。
平板本身做工精良，不同材质之间的衔接非常自然。不过，LCD屏幕的液晶层即使受到轻微压力也会留下可见痕迹。
屏幕周围的窄边框让这款平板看起来非常现代。
功能——包含一个对接端口
一加平板 4 的背面设有三个 Pogo 触点，可让您无需使用蓝牙即可连接键盘保护套。
欧洲版标配 12 GB 内存；国际版还提供 8 GB 内存的机型。这些机型均配备 256 GB 或 512 GB 存储空间；在测试时，两者的价格差约为 100 美元。
软件——不明确的更新政策
基于 Android 16 的 OxygenOS 16 已预装在设备中。OnePlus Pad 4 没有明确的系统更新承诺；通常情况下，OnePlus 表示将为平板电脑提供至少三年的安全更新。EPREL 数据库中没有相关记录；实际上，欧盟要求制造商提供更长的更新周期。
总体而言，用户界面看起来非常简洁；值得庆幸的是，几乎没有预装冗余软件，且多任务处理能力非常强大。
可持续发展
更新情况不明，这当然会影响该平板电脑的长期使用体验。此外，该设备仍包裹在塑料薄膜中；而大多数其他制造商至少已迈出一步，开始采用更环保的替代方案。
通信与GNSS——既非蜂窝网络，亦非GPS
这款大屏平板搭载了先进的 Wi-Fi 7 技术，在我们的测试中展现了极快的数据传输速率。虽然信号接收稳定性稍显不足，但测得的数值对于千兆互联网连接甚至高速家庭网络而言绰绰有余。
遗憾的是，该平板没有蜂窝网络版本，也无法通过卫星定位来确定其位置。
| Networking | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——一加平板电脑的拍照效果不错
尺寸与一加Pad 4相当的平板电脑几乎不适合拍照，原因很简单——它不像智能手机那样便于携带或握持。正因如此，尽管该设备的SoC实际上具备非常出色的图像处理能力，但制造商并未过多强调其摄像头性能。
主摄像头搭载 1300 万像素传感器，拍摄效果不错；即使在低光环境下，照片曝光也恰到好处，清晰度也相当不错。视频甚至可以以每秒 30 帧的速率录制 4K 视频。
前置摄像头拍摄的自拍照尚可，不过清晰度仅属中等。
相机应用中设有专门的文档模式，可让你轻松将笔记或收据数字化，且成像质量不错。
配件与保修——提供笔架和键盘
惊喜：一加 Pad 4 在欧洲版中甚至配备了一个 80 瓦的充电器。除此之外，包装盒内仅附带一条 USB 数据线。
您需要单独购买 OnePlus Stylo Pro——这是一款具备 16,000 级压力感应和可更换笔尖的主动式触控笔。它支持触控和手势操作以实现各种快捷功能，若不慎遗失，还可通过铃声定位。不过，该产品在欧洲仅通过少数几家零售商有售。
OnePlus Pad 4 智能键盘同样如此，它通过平板背面上的弹针与设备连接，既可作为保护套，又能充当键盘使用。
对于在欧盟购买的设备，一加提供 24 个月的保修服务。
输入设备与操作——更快、更精准的平板电脑触摸屏
屏幕每秒检测540次触控输入——不过仅在特定情况下；大多数时候，240 Hz的采样率已足够。这依然足以实现非常流畅的输入，而屏幕每秒最高可显示144帧的性能则确保了极快的响应速度。
遗憾的是，该设备未配备指纹传感器，但至少可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。不过，该功能仅采用2D扫描方式，因此安全性稍逊一筹。
显示屏——大尺寸、高亮度且无闪烁
虽然一加 Pad 4 的 IPS 屏幕亮度略逊于荣耀 MagicPad 4 的 OLED 屏幕，但在光线传感器激活时，其约 900 cd/m² 的亮度足以满足阴天户外使用需求。
我们非常欣赏这款13.2英寸显示屏在“Pro”色彩配置文件下的精准色彩还原，以及其采用的无PWM亮度调节技术，这使得专业人士和对光线敏感的用户都能舒适地使用这款平板电脑进行工作。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 901 cd/m²
Contrast: 1060:1 (Black: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.63 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.292
CCT: 6806 K
| OnePlus Pad 4 IPS, 3392x2400, 13.2" | Oppo Pad 5 Pro LCD, 3000x2120, 13.2" | Honor MagicPad 4 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 IPS, 3504x2109, 13" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 197% | -19% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 924 | 911 -1% | 2337 153% | 751 -19% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 906 | 903 0% | 3084 240% | 738 -19% |
| Response Times | 43% | 76% | 49% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 37.3 ? | 27.2 ? 27% | 16.6 ? 55% | 22.8 ? 39% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 32.6 ? | 13.4 ? 59% | 0.91 ? 97% | 13.6 ? 58% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16.05 | |||
| Screen | -0% | 17% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 901 | 899 0% | 829 -8% | 618 -31% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 862 | 865 0% | 827 -4% | 599 -31% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 94 1% | 90 -3% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.85 | 0.9 -6% | 0.5 41% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1060 | 999 -6% | 1236 17% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.63 | 1.74 -7% | 0.9 45% | 1.59 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 3.56 15% | 1.7 60% | 3.79 10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.5 -0% | 1.3 13% | 1.7 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.292 96% | 2.229 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.399 92% |
| CCT | 6806 96% | 6693 97% | 6601 98% | 6583 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
7% | 97% /
65% | 10% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7757 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
其响应时间明显长于OLED显示屏。不过，得益于高分辨率，尽管尺寸较大，该显示屏仍能呈现非常清晰、精准的图像。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
性能——速度再快不过了
高通骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 作为系统级芯片（SoC），是当前性能最强大的移动处理器之一。它能轻松应对最耗资源的应用程序，在导航过程中更是从未出现过卡顿现象。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.x | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7084 - 27428, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3195208 - 4273120, n=10) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (522205 - 4184631, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24487, n=12) | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3564 - 76852, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=11) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 22476, n=36, last 2 years) | |
该GPU也是目前市场上速度最快的Android平板电脑GPU之一。这意味着游戏运行流畅，尽管只有少数几款游戏支持最高144 Hz的刷新率。因此，用户通常只能满足于非常稳定的60 fps。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
一加平板 4 在浏览互联网时也表现得非常快，且能稳定加载网页。
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 147) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 409, n=9) | |
| Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 420, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=15) | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 (Chrome 150) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=41, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=15) | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 (Chrome 150) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (1633 - 138481, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 16233, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 (Chrome 150) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=19) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
* ... smaller is better
UFS 4.1 存储速度极快，可实现短加载时间和快速数据传输。
| OnePlus Pad 4 | Oppo Pad 5 Pro | Honor MagicPad 4 | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | -28% | -41% | -11% | -50% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3997.64 | 4032.65 1% | 1978.75 -51% | 1912.4 -52% | 3537 ? -12% | 2073 ? -48% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3702.2 | 3687.21 0% | 1752.63 -53% | 1852.7 -50% | 3223 ? -13% | 1667 ? -55% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 472.13 | 471.09 0% | 513.85 9% | 347.8 -26% | 432 ? -8% | 275 ? -42% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 700.22 | 699.38 0% | 574.85 -18% | 438.3 -37% | 614 ? -12% | 324 ? -54% |
排放量——性能仅略有下降
温度
尽管平板电脑的中上部区域明显存在发热现象，但通常这并不构成问题，至少在适中的环境温度下是如此。
在3DMark压力测试中，性能出现轻微波动，但总体而言，即使经过长时间使用，性能仍基本保持稳定。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Pad 5 Pro | |
发言人
这款配备八个扬声器的音响系统，低音效果确实还有待加强。目前听起来中频偏重，音质尚可，但绝称不上出色。
扬声器和有线耳机均可通过USB接口连接。该设备支持蓝牙6.0进行无线音频传输，并兼容最常见的音频编解码器。
OnePlus Pad 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicPad 4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
电池续航——高效且持久
能量摄入
在待机模式下，功耗相当低；即使在满载运行时，这款配备大屏幕且性能强劲的平板电脑耗电量也不算太大。总体而言，一加平板 4 的能效表现相当出色。
它支持最高 80 瓦的充电功率，充满电大约需要 85 分钟。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.3 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
| Load |
6.9 / 12.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus Pad 4 13380 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 Pro 13380 mAh | Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -103% | 17% | -68% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.3 | 1.4 -8% | 3.53 -172% | 0.869 ? 33% | 2.21 ? -70% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.8 | 1.7 6% | 4.77 -165% | 1.321 ? 27% | 4.01 ? -123% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.2 | 2.1 5% | 4.86 -121% | 1.526 ? 31% | 4.4 ? -100% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.9 | 6.7 3% | 11.21 -62% | 7.71 ? -12% | 8.92 ? -29% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 12.1 | 12.1 -0% | 11.67 4% | 11.1 ? 8% | 14.4 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
这款电池容量高达 13,380 mAh，性能非常强劲，与Oppo Pad 5 Pro 一样，证明了它拥有极长的续航时间：在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，续航时间达到了 25 小时 16 分钟，这证实了在适度使用的情况下，这款平板电脑很可能能够持续使用两个工作日。
如此大的电池容量，即使身边没有电源插座，也能让你在沙发上轻松度过一天，尽情观看流媒体视频。
| OnePlus Pad 4 13380 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 Pro 13380 mAh | Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 10200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -1% | -48% | -44% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 25.3 | 25.1 -1% | 13.1 -48% | 14.2 -44% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 26 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.3 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
一加 Pad 4 很可能是该品牌在欧洲正式发布的最后几款平板电脑之一。
这令人遗憾，因为它以合理的价格提供了出色的续航能力、强劲的性能和明亮的屏幕。
OnePlus Pad 4
- 07/22/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可选方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.8%  | OnePlus Pad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 799€ | 672 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI IPS |
2. 88.1%  | Oppo Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $24.95 BoxWave Keyboard Compatible ... 2. $10.99 BMPNLSZ [2-Pack] for Oppo Pa... 3. $14.29 BMPNLSZ TPU Cover for Oppo P... List Price: 700€ | 672 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 13.20" 3000x2120 278 PPI LCD |
3. 89.6%  | Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $289.99 HONOR Pad 10 (12.1 inch, Wi-... 2. $292.23 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 8GB ... 3. $683.00 Honor MagicPad3 Wi-Fi Tablet... List Price: 600€ | 450 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED |
4. 86.5%  | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 529€ | 598 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.00" 3504x2109 315 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
