Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone 13 Pro评测--有小缺点的爆炸性智能手机

13是魅力所在! iPhone带着120赫兹的面板、更大的电池和改进的相机系统进入下一轮比赛。在我们的审查中，iPhone 13 Pro不仅赢得了超级赞誉，也赢得了一些批评的观点。
5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

Apple iPhone 13 Pro和 iPhone 12 Pro有很多相似之处。然而，在举起iPhone 13 Pro时，额外的重量和相机镜头尺寸的增加是立即可以看到的。

iPhone 13 Pro配备了Apple A15 Bionic，更大的电池和更明亮的OLED显示屏，具有自适应刷新率功能。此外，iPhone 13 Pro支持高达120赫兹的刷新率。128GB入门级机型的价格仍然是1149欧元（约1332美元）。1TB顶级型号的建议零售价为1729欧元（约合人民币2005元）。

阅读这篇评论，了解iPhone 13 Pro的潜在买家应该注意的创新和妥协。

Apple iPhone 13 Pro (iPhone Series)
Processor
Apple A15 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.10 inch 19.48:9, 2532 x 1170 pixel 457 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, Super Retina XDR Display with ProMotion, OLED, DolbyVision, True Tone, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
, 240.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Digital Compass, Magnetometer, Barometer, Three-Axis gyro, Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Face ID
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.65 x 146.7 x 71.5
Battery
11.97 Wh, 3095 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.87 V
Charging
wireless charging
Operating System
Apple iOS 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.5, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide/Macro, f/1.8, 120°) + 12 MPix (3x optical Zoom, f/2.8) + LiDAR-Scanner; 4k-HDR-Video with Dolby Vision
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, Lightning-to-USB Cable, Sticker, Quick Start Guide, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo, QZSS and BeiDou; Wireless Charging up to 15 W, MagSafe; Body-SAR: 0.98 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg; IP68; UWB, fanless, waterproof
Weight
203 g
Price
1269 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.8 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core		203 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
89.8 %
10/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14, A14 Bionic GPU		189 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
88.7 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core		173 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
90.4 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14		227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
89.2 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660		234 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88.9 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660		193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
87.2 %
06/2021
Sony Xperia 1 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660		186 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
iPhone 13 Pro - 颜色方案
iPhone 13 Pro - 颜色方案

Apple iPhone 13 Pro的中框是由不锈钢制成的，背面是由磨砂玻璃制成的。该设备的正面由Apple's Ceramic Shield玻璃保护，这应该比任何其他智能手机中的玻璃更坚固。然而，我们无法证实这一说法，特别是考虑到我们的iPhone 13 Pro的屏幕在仔细使用几天后就出现了一些微型划痕。iPhone 13 Pro最值得注意的地方之一是它的重量。13 Pro的重量为203克，拿在手里感觉有点重。

制造质量简直是一流的。没有任何缝隙或锯齿状的边缘，SIM卡插槽感觉完全与框架平齐。iPhone 13 Pro一点也不弯曲。此外，该设备通过了IP68认证，这意味着它是防尘和防水的。

凹槽已经缩小了（水平方向）。现在，它的面积只有2.16平方厘米。凹槽的宽度减少了0.78厘米。然而，其高度增加了0.4厘米。背面有一个非常明显的摄像头凸起，现在有3.75毫米的高度。12 Pro的摄像头凸起仅从背面伸出1.75毫米。

iPhone 13 Pro有以下配色。塞拉蓝（也就是我们评测设备的颜色），银色，金色和石墨色。

Size Comparison

❌
165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 186 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 234 g163.6 mm 74 mm 8.26 mm 193 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.7 mm 173 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.65 mm 203 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.4 mm 189 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 不是所有的iPhone型号都支持ProRes

不出所料，iPhone 13 Pro仍然采用Lighting端口，这并不以快速的数据传输速度而闻名。然而，它已经存在了多年，这就是为什么这个端口的存在确保了与各种配件的高度兼容。

iPhone 13 Pro还具有蓝牙5.0、NFC、MagSafe和UWB。背面的磁铁阵列（MagSafe）允许用户将各种各样的配件连接到iPhone上。

iPhone 13 Pro的内部存储器不可扩展，而且仍然没有耳机插孔。有4种存储选项。

  • 128 GB - 1149欧元（约1332美元
    ）256 GB - 1269欧元（约1472美元


  • 512GB--1499欧元（约合人民币1738元）。
  • 1024 GB - 1729欧元（~2005美元

买家应该注意，128GB版本不适合录制ProRes视频，因为ProRes镜头的比特率非常高。

返回顶部
返回顶部
左侧。SIM卡插槽，音量减低按钮，音量增加按钮，静音开关
左侧。SIM卡插槽，音量减低按钮，音量增加按钮，静音开关
右侧。电源按钮
右侧。电源按钮
底部。扬声器、Lightning 端口、麦克风
底部。扬声器、Lightning 端口、麦克风

软件 - iPhone 13 Pro运行iOS 15

在我们审查期间，我们的iPhone 13 Pro被更新到iOS 15.0.2。这次更新带来了新的Focus功能和扩大的主屏幕定制。

Apple ，还改进了天气和导航应用程序。此外，iPhone现在可以在数字钥匙的帮助下解锁汽车和门，这些钥匙可以存储在钱包应用程序中。有听力障碍的人现在可以对音频配置文件进行调整，以提高他们的听力能力。有关完整的变化清单，请访问：https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-15/features/。

通信和GNSS--iPhone 13 Pro没有新功能

Apple iPhone 13 Pro支持Wi-Fi 6（双频：2.4和5 GHz）。通过我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX 12，iPhone能够实现稳定的数据传输率。然而，鉴于iPhone 13 Pro采用了MIMO天线阵列，数据传输率应该是两倍。矛盾的是，iPhone 13 Pro的速度比普通版iPhone 13慢。更重要的是，今年的iPhone没有配备Wi-Fi 6E，它首次提供三频支持。

iPhone 13 Pro支持所有最新的移动通信标准。然而，目前在德国不支持超高速的毫米波5G。新的iPhone又支持两个2个LTE频段和一个5G频段，这使得它在全球范围内更加可用。Apple ，并没有说明5G网络的最大数据传输速率。然而，iPhone 13 Pro中的高通骁龙X60 5G调制解调器理论上可以实现高达7.5 Gb/s的下载速度和高达3 Gb/s的上传速度。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1281 (635min - 1400max) MBit/s +84%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1190 (1121min - 1230max) MBit/s +70%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s -9%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
736 (667min - 787max) MBit/s +5%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
698 (632min - 775max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
676 (632min - 694max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s -74%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (806min - 865max) MBit/s +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
779 (363min - 824max) MBit/s +18%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
697 (500min - 767max) MBit/s +6%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
660 (599min - 698max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
527 (457min - 562max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -43%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (599-698)
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 4-Core; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (672-723)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø698 (632-775)
Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 4-Core; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (794-859)

Apple ，没有说明iPhone 13 Pro中的GNSS模块是否为双频和三频。对于地理定位，我们的评测设备依赖于以下全球导航卫星系统。GPS、GLONASS、北斗、QZSS和Galileo。iPhone 13 Pro在接收我们的位置方面没有问题。

事实证明，在我们骑车的过程中，iPhone 13 Pro与我们的专业导航仪Garmin Edge 500一样准确。

GNSS自行车骑行。环湖骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。环湖骑行
GNSS自行车骑行。拐弯处
GNSS自行车骑行。拐弯处
全球卫星导航系统自行车骑行。测试结果
全球卫星导航系统自行车骑行。测试结果

电话和通话质量

电话应用

iPhone 13 Pro的通话质量处于非常好的水平，至少在安静的环境中是如此。在室外，iPhone 13 Pro有时会努力抑制环境噪音。Apple，其降噪算法会使用户在室外打电话时听起来很有鼻音。iPhone 13 Pro的特点是支持VoLTE、WiFi通话和双SIM卡功能（由于支持eSIM）。

在扬声器模式下，Apple，只要你保持相对较近的距离，智能手机就不难接收到声音。

摄像机--全面升级的三层摄像机系统

用iPhone 13 Pro拍摄的自拍
用iPhone 13 Pro拍摄的自拍

iPhone 13 Pro采用了与iPhone 11 Pro和iPhone 12 Pro相同的前置传感器，这就是为什么它产生的照片看起来非常相似。总而言之，图像看起来很自然，而低光性能仍然相对较差。只要有足够的光线，人像拍摄的效果就很好。自拍相机能以60 FPS的速度录制4K视频，采用DolbyVision。Apple，其新的电影模式也适用于前置相机。

后置摄像头系统由三个1200万像素的图像传感器组成。它在今年进行了升级。现在，专业机型之间没有区别。所有三个镜头都非常强大。iPhone 13专业版提供3倍光学变焦。超宽镜头现在可以用来拍摄微距照片和录制微距视频。iPhone 13 Pro在低光环境下产生的图像明显更清晰。日光下的照片显得色彩准确、锐利和曝光良好。不幸的是，低分辨率的图像传感器不能总是提供与其他智能手机中非常高的分辨率传感器相同的清晰度。

今年，Apple ，推出了电影模式，目前只在专业机型上提供。电影模式允许用户在拍摄视频时创造虚化效果。专业机型也应该得到更新，这将使它们能够以高质量的ProRes编解码器录制视频。然而，要录制4K30 ProRes视频，用户将需要一个至少有256GB存储空间的iPhone 13 Pro。拥有128GB内部内存的机型，只能以30FPS的速度拍摄1080p。此外，iPhone 13 Pro可以用25 FPS拍摄PAL视频（但不能用50 FPS）。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angle5X zoomUltra wide-angleLow-light photography

在受控的照明条件下，iPhone 13 Pro的摄像头能产生非常详细和色彩准确的图像。然而，绿色和皮肤色调的预生产肯定可以改进。

ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 13 Pro: 7.4 ∆E min: 2.51 - max: 13.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
29 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
59.6 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
68.8 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
49 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 13 Pro: 43.07 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 68.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - 新的AppleCare+产品

Apple Care+
关怀+
Apple Care+ with theft protection
护理+

iPhone 13 Pro的包装盒内容与前代机型相同。13 Pro带有一个Apple 贴纸，信息手册，一个SIM卡拆卸工具和一条USB-C到Lightning 的电缆。Apple ，为iPhone 13 Pro提供许多配件，如充电器和保护壳。

iPhone 13 Pro有一年的制造商保修期（在欧洲有两年的销售商保修期）。还有各种AppleCare+产品（保修套餐），可以购买这些产品来延长保修时间。Apple 还通过其Apple Care+计划提供失窃和意外损坏保护。

输入设备和操作--终于为iPhone提供了ProMotion

Apple iPhone 13 Pro的触摸屏有一个非常光滑的表面，对输入的反应迅速而准确。由于采用了ProMotion显示屏，iPhone 13 Pro的反应速度令人难以置信。Apple，其默认键盘可以用App Store中的任何键盘替换。

iPhone 13 Pro可以通过Face ID进行解锁，工作迅速而可靠。与iPad Air不同，iPhone 13 Pro没有将指纹传感器集成到电源按钮中。鉴于Face ID在戴着面具的情况下并不总是有效，能够通过Touch ID解锁iPhone就更好了。

背面的苹果标志仍然可以通过双击或三击来执行某些操作。这一功能在与单手模式结合时特别有用，通过这种方式可以非常快速地启动。然而，这一功能必须在设置中启用。

带有自适应刷新率和直流调光的120-Hz显示器

像素排列
像素排列

Apple iPhone 13 Pro采用6.1英寸（15.49厘米，91.41平方厘米）OLED显示屏，分辨率为FHD Plus。亮度有了明显的提高，在启用环境光传感器的情况下，现在达到了1050cd/m²--这是相当多的。在APL50测试中，峰值亮度基本保持不变（APL50：1062 cd/m²）。在禁用环境光传感器的情况下，亮度峰值为855 cd/m²。Apple ，规定HDR峰值亮度为1200 cd/m²。

iPhone 13 Pro和更大的Max型号是首批采用ProMotion屏幕的两款iPhone，其自适应刷新率可在10至120赫兹之间。

不幸的是，OLED面板有PWM闪烁的问题（亮度为10%及以下时的闪烁频率。240赫兹；高于10%亮度时。 446.4-510.2赫兹）。)然而，Apple ，在iPhone 13 Pro中整合了一个直流调光模式。总而言之，iPhone的屏幕在改善OLED闪烁方面做了相当多的工作。

1057
cd/m²		1067
cd/m²		1063
cd/m²
1052
cd/m²		1050
cd/m²		1060
cd/m²
1057
cd/m²		1062
cd/m²		1056
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Super Retina XDR Display with ProMotion tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1067 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1058.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1050 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10		Apple iPhone 12 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10		Apple iPhone 13
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10		Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80		Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.81		Oppo Find X3 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70		Sony Xperia 1 III
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Screen
-22%
6%
-34%
-27%
-4%
-165%
Brightness middle
1050
822
-22%
831
-21%
910
-13%
891
-15%
759
-28%
537
-49%
Brightness
1058
820
-22%
830
-22%
913
-14%
888
-16%
776
-27%
539
-49%
Brightness Distribution
98
99
1%
98
0%
98
0%
99
1%
94
-4%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
0.77
23%
2
-100%
1.9
-90%
0.8
20%
4.78
-378%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
3.5
-46%
1.52
37%
3.1
-29%
3.7
-54%
1.8
25%
7.83
-226%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.8
-20%
1.2
20%
2.2
-47%
1.3
13%
1.6
-7%
5.8
-287%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.209 100%
2.06 107%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.363 93%
CCT
6504 100%
6337 103%
6501 100%
6512 100%
6527 100%
6512 100%
7982 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 510 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

iPhone 13 Pro的屏幕色彩非常准确（禁用True Tone）。只有白平衡有一丁点偏差。

启用True Tone后，在黑暗环境中，屏幕会产生较少的蓝光以保护用户的眼睛。然而，这导致了不正确的白平衡。

灰度（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
灰度（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
色彩准确性（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
色彩准确性（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
色彩空间覆盖（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
色彩空间覆盖（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB
饱和度（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（关闭真实色调，色彩空间：sRGB）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外，iPhone 13 Pro令人印象深刻。即使在极其明亮的环境中，屏幕也清晰可辨，部分原因是非常有效的防反射涂层。

OLED面板的可视角度是非常好的。尽管在非常尖锐的角度下，亮度略有下降，颜色也显得有点冷。

Apple iPhone 13 Pro的可视角度
Apple iPhone 13 Pro的可视角度

性能 -Apple A15提供一个小的提升

安兔兔。内存测试
安兔兔。内存测试

今年的专业机型采用的是 A15 Bionic带有五核GPU。我们的评测机型配备了6GB的内存（LPDDR4x）。

在基准测试中，与A14相比，A15的单核性能高出9%，多核性能高出16%。在旧的3DMark序列的物理部分，A14 Bionic A14 Bionic实际上比A15 Bionic快，可能是因为后者节流了。在生产力基准测试中，额外的GPU核心并没有提高性能。

iPhone 13 Pro配备了非常快的内部存储，这就是为什么它能够实现非常好的数据传输率。

Geekbench 5.5 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Antutu v9 | AImark | Basemark GPU 1.2
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1749 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1604 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
989 Points -43%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1123 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1134 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1755 Points 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1590 - 1755, n=9)
1723 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -48%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4829 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
4160 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3462 Points -28%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3535 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3629 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4820 Points 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (4559 - 4914, n=9)
4755 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points -38%
Metal Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
14115 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
9172 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
10572 Points -25%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (10572 - 14115, n=8)
12625 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12441 - 20198, n=5, last 2 years)
15299 Points +8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
7773 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
9094 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9245 Points +19%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8768 Points +13%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10642 Points +37%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  ()
7773 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
31940 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
20511 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
13273 Points -58%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13647 Points -57%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15592 Points -51%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  ()
31940 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2130 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3084 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4483 Points +110%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3895 Points +83%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5041 Points +137%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  ()
2130 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5956 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6903 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points +40%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9540 Points +60%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6110 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
5713 Points -4%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (5713 - 6175, n=5)
5870 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)
6737 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
16221 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
10348 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points -33%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12394 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10037 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9878 Points -39%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (9878 - 16221, n=5)
13743 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)
9723 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1852 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3187 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points +151%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5283 Points +185%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
2579 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2307 Points +25%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1852 - 2307, n=5)
2027 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)
4224 Points +128%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
9386 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
6627 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5689 Points -39%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5657 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5851 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
8788 Points -6%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (8357 - 9680, n=6)
9139 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)
2555 Points -73%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
11700 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
8672 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5734 Points -51%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5721 Points -51%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5850 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9979 Points -15%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (8909 - 11779, n=8)
10800 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)
6280 Points -46%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3059 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1871 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1552 Points -49%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1497 Points -51%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2470 Points -19%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (2243 - 3080, n=8)
2759 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=207, last 2 years)
1689 Points -45%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2864 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1758 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1498 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1423 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2313 Points -19%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1877 - 2864, n=8)
2528 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1698 Points -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps +73%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.8 - 60.1, n=8)
60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
417 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
318 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps -63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
281 fps -33%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
230 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
416.3 fps 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (358 - 447, n=8)
413 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
98 fps +63%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.2 fps 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.8 - 60.2, n=8)
60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +20%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
229 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
180 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
177 fps -23%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
127 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
217.4 fps -5%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (165.9 - 253, n=8)
221 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.3 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
62 fps +3%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps -40%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.8 - 60.1, n=8)
60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +2%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
151 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
109.9 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
121 fps -20%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
93 fps -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
138.6 fps -8%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 172.4, n=8)
139.6 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps -34%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
51.8 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
35 fps -42%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps -53%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
58.5 fps -2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (53.2 - 60, n=8)
57.8 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -28%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
95 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
71 fps -25%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
96.6 fps +2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (68.8 - 105.2, n=8)
92.9 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps -37%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
58.6 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps -38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps -27%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
38 fps -37%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
53 fps -12%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.1 - 60.1, n=7)
59.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)
44 fps -27%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
119 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
84.1 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps -42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
85 fps -29%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
72 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
112.9 fps -5%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (95.9 - 122.2, n=8)
110.1 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)
64.3 fps -46%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
47.5 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps -57%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
26 fps -57%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
25 fps -58%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
37 fps -38%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
54.9 fps -8%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (49.4 - 60, n=8)
55.6 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)
32.8 fps -45%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39 fps
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
31.2 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps -28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
30 fps -23%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps -28%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps -31%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
37.2 fps -5%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (34.6 - 41.2, n=8)
38.4 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)
25.6 fps -34%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800608 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
749520 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
801983 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
813876 Points +2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (722973 - 832548, n=8)
788523 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -8%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
105536 Points
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
92916 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
241222 Points +129%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
262983 Points +149%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
105623 Points 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (104532 - 107460, n=5)
105796 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -80%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
98.8 (21.37min - 228.87max) fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.65 - 13860, n=54, last 2 years)
329 fps
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
59.8 (16.66min - 145.51max) fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 9309, n=53, last 2 years)
239 fps
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
84.4 (17.95min - 272.19max) fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.51 - 15712, n=55, last 2 years)
406 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
52.1 (22.24min - 74.36max) fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 14706, n=54, last 2 years)
339 fps
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
219.6 (65.28min - 811.03max) fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
212.9 fps -3%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (203 - 220, n=3)
212 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (232 - 258, n=5, last 2 years)
248 fps +13%
Metal Medium Native (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
164.7 (70.67min - 643.09max) fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
155.4 fps -6%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (155.4 - 167.9, n=3)
162.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (157.8 - 192.5, n=6, last 2 years)
174.8 fps +6%

iPhone 13 Pro提供了一个很好的互联网浏览体验。在浏览器基准测试中，iPhone完全压倒了竞争对手。

Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A15 Bionic (173.5 - 189.9, n=8)
182.1 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
181.6 Points
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
180 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
161.4 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
94.3 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.6 Points -58%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.7 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (383 - 414, n=6)
401 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
399.8 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
342.7 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
160.9 Points -61%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
139.4 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.3 Points -69%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -75%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A15 Bionic (228 - 347, n=8)
266 runs/min +9%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
244 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
243 runs/min
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
196 runs/min -19%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -56%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
98 runs/min -60%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min -65%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Apple A15 Bionic (219 - 279, n=8)
254 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
248 Points
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
219 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
193 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
141 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points -47%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
129 Points -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
64222 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (57143 - 65969, n=8)
63305 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
62664 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
58488 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
33423 Points -48%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
27914 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1786 ms * -332%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
1782 ms * -331%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
1646 ms * -298%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -286%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro (Safari Mobile 14)
460.4 ms * -11%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (414 - 507, n=8)
456 ms * -10%
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * -0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

游戏--高刷新率的游戏还不是一个东西

不幸的是，在我们审查的时候，GameBench并不能与iOS 15一起工作，这就是为什么我们无法提供游戏基准。我们将在晚些时候提供游戏基准测试。

iPhone 13 Pro有一个非常有能力的GPU，应该能够处理所有现代游戏。在游戏时，凹槽偶尔会因为遮挡抬头显示器而碍事。

14.10.2021更新。增加了游戏基准测试。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
沥青9: 传说
沥青9: 传说
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; 3.1.2: Ø58.6 (47-60)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (56-60)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (58-60)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (56-60)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.6.0: Ø41.2 (37-57)

排放 - 内部温度高，影响性能

温度

GFXBench。T-Rex
T-Rex
GFXBench。曼哈顿
曼哈顿

闲置时，iPhone 13 Pro在亮度达到最大时变得相当热。在满负荷状态下，表面温度略有上升。然而，iPhone 13 Pro的温度并不像更便宜的 iPhone 13.

我们使用GFXBenchmark来测试负载下的系统稳定性。在这里，我们连续三次运行每个序列。电池状态和帧率都被记录下来。在T-Rex（OpenGL ES 2.0）和Manhattan（Metal）基准测试中，iPhone 13 Pro表现非常好。然而，在3DMark Wild Life中，性能有所下降。不过，即使在节流的情况下，iPhone 13 Pro中的A15的表现与 Exynos 2100中的 Galaxy S21 Ultra在其最佳状态下的表现。

Max. Load
 34.7 °C34.2 °C34.2 °C 
 35.1 °C34.7 °C34 °C 
 33.5 °C32.8 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 34 °C
34.2 °C34.7 °C35 °C
33.2 °C35.8 °C35.6 °C
32.7 °C35.6 °C33.4 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.7 (47.5-58.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø25.4 (22.3-34.4)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.1-18.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.98 (7.01-11.7)

发言人

就像 12专业版iPhone 13 Pro的扬声器位于听筒内和底部。音质有一定程度的改善，特别是在中端，这就是为什么iPhone 13 Pro听起来更清晰一些。在全音量下，iPhone 13 Pro不会产生大量的低音，清晰度也不高。

用户可以通过Lightning 端口连接有线耳机。不过，必须单独购买一个适当的适配器。无线耳机可以通过蓝牙5.0连接到iPhone 13 Pro上。然而，不支持Hi-Res编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203734.52525.636.33129.1354023.431.65036.840.46328.436.28024.837.510022.437.712519.244.116016.955.420015.655.725013.855.531513.461.340013.361.450013.864.36301268.280012.770.3100012.272.212501374.7160013.777.4200013.279.2250013.479.731501380.2400013.379.2500013.679.5630013.380.7800013.879.81000013.780.2125001472.91600013.564.8SPL25.590.2N0.782median 13.5median 72.9Delta0.79.530.825.822.62619.223.721.424.132.83618.624.218.123.715.427.710.739.41756.114.954.313.25812.562.311.565.710.566.89.968.311.971.110.676.213.676.81471.212.972.511.773.512.978.913.180.113.377.113.873.21479.513.574.414.272.51763.425880.675median 13.2median 72.51.27hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 13 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--iPhone 13 Pro非常节能

能源消耗

iPhone 13 Pro的峰值耗电量比前代产品高。更亮的屏幕可能是造成这种情况的原因。在最低亮度下，13 Pro更节能，可能是由于Apple"自适应刷新率技术"。在设定的显示亮度下，iPhone 13 Pro被证明是一款非常节能的智能手机，不仅因为它的耗电量非常小，而且还因为它的性能超过了其他竞争对手。

使用有线PD充电器，iPhone 13 Pro的充电功率最高可达20W。通过无线方式，它可以用Qi充电器以7.5瓦充电，用MagSafe充电器以15瓦充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt
Load midlight 3.06 / 4.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh		Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh		Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh		Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh		Average Apple A15 Bionic
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
-17%
-61%
-65%
-61%
-30%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.64
-25%
0.6
-18%
1.06
-108%
1.13
-122%
0.93
-82%
0.66 ?(0.51 - 1.1, n=8)
-29%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-76%
Idle Average *
1.54
1.22
21%
1
35%
1.19
23%
1.67
-8%
1.54
-0%
1.303 ?(0.8 - 2.2, n=8)
15%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.24
21%
1.3
17%
1.2
24%
1.69
-8%
1.69
-8%
1.748 ?(1 - 4.2, n=8)
-11%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-4%
Load Average *
3.06
3.04
1%
4.5
-47%
6.46
-111%
5.17
-69%
6.38
-108%
4.85 ?(2.65 - 6.7, n=8)
-58%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-81%
Load Maximum *
4.59
3.86
16%
7.8
-70%
10.76
-134%
9.9
-116%
9.58
-109%
7.77 ?(3.56 - 11.4, n=8)
-69%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-81%

* ... smaller is better

Power Draw: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.98 (0.783-10.2)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.28 (1.358-11.1)

Power Draw: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.84 (3.75-9.01)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.5-10.9)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.641-0.717)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.377 (1.201-1.729)

电池寿命

iPhone 13 Pro拥有3095毫安时的电池，与竞争对手相比，它看起来很小。然而，iPhone 13 Pro配备的电池比前代产品更大，因此提供了更长的电池运行时间。Apple"的智能手机具有令人难以置信的能源效率，这就是为什么它在竞争中表现非常好。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 34min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15)
16h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 33min
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh		Apple iPhone 12 Pro
2815 mAh		Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh		Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 III
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-5%
-24%
-36%
-24%
-46%
Reader / Idle
2614
2091
-20%
2734
5%
1408
-46%
1108
-58%
H.264
1493
1117
-25%
1224
-18%
1310
-12%
1006
-33%
WiFi v1.3
993
781
-21%
1019
3%
702
-29%
650
-35%
757
-24%
534
-46%
Load
333
311
-7%
299
-10%
304
-9%
276
-17%

Pros

+ 反应灵敏的系统
+ 杰出的120-Hz OLED显示屏
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 良好的三合一摄像系统
+ 准确的地理定位
+ 支持许多LTE和5G的频率

Cons

- 沉重的
- 欧洲没有5G-毫米波
- 缓慢的Wi-Fi 6
- 有限的NFC功能
- 电话中的降噪效果差

评语--有很多优质的东西，有一些小瑕疵

Apple iPhone 13 Pro的评论
Apple iPhone 13 Pro的评论

今年的iPhone 13 Pro并没有提供大量的设计变化。相反，Apple"的高端智能手机终于获得了120-Hz的屏幕。iPhone 13 Pro的显示屏很有可能是目前市场上最好的智能手机显示屏。120-Hz的OLED面板提供了非常高的亮度，非常准确的色彩和直流调光。然而，我们确实要注意到，Apple ，在这个特殊的聚会上有点晚。

凭借大电池，iPhone 13 Pro能够实现创纪录的电池运行时间。只有强大变焦镜头的爱好者才能在Android ，找到比iPhone更好的东西。说到摄像，iPhone是国王。

Apple iPhone 13 Pro在某些方面有改进，但没有新的突破性功能。

鉴于iPhone 13 Pro可能会持续很多很多年，届时mmWave 5G将变得非常重要，在德国缺乏对mmWave 5G的支持是相当恼人的。扬声器在全音量时表现不佳，而且不支持高清晰度蓝牙编解码。此外，现在是时候了Apple ，升级相机算法，改善电话通话中的降噪。

基于Android 的强大竞争对手包括 三星Galaxy S21 Ultra，以及 小米11 Ultra和 奥普Find X3 Pro.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

iPhone 13 Pro目前在Apple "的网站上有售。.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
61 / 70 → 87%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
94%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
81%
Average
85%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 13 Pro评测--有小缺点的爆炸性智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-10-19 (Update: 2021-10-19)