Notebookcheck Logo

小米MIX 4智能手机评测--带隐形自拍镜的高端产品

诺奇,不,谢谢。 Mix 4是小米的第一款在显示屏下有前置摄像头的智能手机。这款玻璃和陶瓷包覆的6.67英寸智能手机以其高端的骁龙888+系统芯片、高达12GB的内存、AMOLED面板和108MP的三摄系统提供了额外的购买论据。此外,还有120瓦的快速充电,在30分钟内完成电池充电。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

通过Mix 4,小米推出了一款新的高端智能手机,其硬件设备听起来令人印象深刻。6.67英寸的Mix 4拥有最快的移动SoC之一的 骁龙888+ 5G.此外,还有120赫兹的AMOLED面板,高达12GB的内存和512GB的存储空间,120瓦的充电器提供快速充电,以及50瓦的无线充电。相机也显示了一些高端的野心,108MP的三星Isocell HMX1作为主要传感器。

但这还不是全部,相机提供了另一个有趣的细节。Mix 4是小米第一款拥有隐藏在屏幕下的前置摄像头的智能手机。它的分辨率为2000万像素,完全没有任何凹槽或弹出式机械装置。然而,这并不是一个全新的功能,因为其他智能手机,如三星Galaxy Fold 3和 中兴通讯Axon 30也提供了一个显示器下的摄像头。

官方称,小米MIX 4只在中国销售,但你也可以在德国从TradingShenzhen等进口商那里得到它,他们为我们提供了测试装置。在这次测试中,我们发现Mix 4与目前的高端竞争对手相比表现如何,以及它的屏下摄像头在实践中是否也做得不错。

Xiaomi Mix 4 (Mix Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, 480 Hz scan rate, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (850/1900/2100 MHz), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28), 5G (N1/N3/N5/N8/N28/N41/N77/N78/N79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.02 x 162.65 x 75.35
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung ISOCELL HMX, OIS, f/1.95, 24mm, 1/1.33", 0.8µm) + 8MP (OIS, 5x optical zoom, f/4.1, 120mm) + 13MP Ultrawide (f/2.2, 12mm, 1/3.06", 1.12µm)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix under-display, 27mm, 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Additional features
Speakers: Harman Kardon dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 120 W charger, USB cable, protective case, MiUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
225 g, Power Supply: 185 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.7 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Mix 4
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
225 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
90.8 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
203 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
88.9 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
90.4 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
87.2 %
06/2021
Sony Xperia 1 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644

外壳--由于采用了弧形显示屏,所以采用了无边框设计

小米将Mix 4包裹在由玻璃和陶瓷制成的一体成型的外壳中。设计和做工都非常有吸引力,外壳看起来就像由一体成型的。虽然它的重量为225克(约8盎司),不是最轻的6.67英寸智能手机之一,但稍高的重量也强调了高质量的印象。

AMOLED显示屏受到大猩猩玻璃Victus的保护,其谨慎的圆形长边与金属框架融为一体。在侧面和顶部,边框只有几毫米宽,但它们仍然足以防止在120赫兹显示屏上的非故意输入。只有底部边框变的稍宽,但仍有一个几乎无边框设计的整体印象。显示器占据了约88%的字体面积。

闪亮的陶瓷背面使Mix 4相当引人注目,因为后盖的反射率比显示屏高。不幸的是,这也将背面变成了指纹磁铁。由于拿在手里也相当滑,建议使用Mix 4的透明保护套。

如果你不考虑其闪亮的表面,后盖的设计很简单。唯一突出的是底部边缘的垂直小米字样和顶部巨大的相机模块,它从后盖伸出几毫米。虽然相机系统始终保持黑色,但你可以在黑色、白色或灰色中选择机箱盖的颜色。

Size Comparison

165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 186 g163.6 mm 74 mm 8.26 mm 193 g162.65 mm 75.35 mm 8.02 mm 225 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.65 mm 203 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--混合4中高达12GB的内存和512GB的存储。

小米MIX 4有8或12GB LPDDR5-RAM和128、256或512GB UFS-3.1存储。提供四种不同的存储组合:8/128 GB、8/256 GB、12/256 GB和12/512 GB。例如,最小版本的Mix 4在TradingShenzhen的价格约为600欧元(约合675美元),而你必须支付约790欧元(约合889美元)来购买拥有12/512 GB存储的顶级版本。没有microSD插槽。

Mix 4的其余设备包括NFC、红外辐射器和5G的双SIM卡。USB-C端口只支持USB-2.0速度,但也可以用其OTG兼容性来连接外围设备。由于没有专门的音频端口,它也必须履行音频输出的作用。然而,你必须自己购买一个适配器,因为这并不包括在内。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
顶部:红外辐射器,麦克风
顶部:红外辐射器,麦克风
底部:双SIM卡、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、扬声器
底部:双SIM卡、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、扬声器

软件--Google Play以后可以轻松安装

Mix 4包括Android 11和小米的MIUI 12.5用户界面。小米通常以3个月的间隔为其当前的智能手机型号提供更新,因此,Android 安全补丁也应始终保持最新。在我们测试的时候(11月底),它们处于10月1日的水平,所以在我们的测试设备上,MIUI-Version 12.5.12仍然相当新鲜。

由于你目前只能通过进口来获得Mix 4,所以也只有一个英文/中文的ROM。Google Play也没有安装。然而,由于所有必要的服务都已经预装在Mix 4上,你可以在以后使用APK文件轻松安装Google Play。

通信和GNSS - 快速的WiFi 6E和精确的GPS

Mix 4支持NFC和蓝牙5.2。移动通信频率范围涵盖2G和3G,以及14个4G频段和9个5G频段。支持的频段还包括所有在德国很重要的4G频段(3、7、20频段),以及所有德国5G供应商使用的n78 5G频段。

在无线局域网方面,Mix 4与WiFi 6E进行通信,显示出非常快的速度,同时传输率保持非常稳定。结合我们的Linksys Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,发送时的传输率在我们的对比设备中获得了第一名,勉强超过了三星Galaxy S21 Ultra 。在接收数据时,只有Oppo Find X3 Pro ,但也快了不少。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1281 (635min - 1400max) MBit/s +47%
Xiaomi Mix 4
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (423min - 910max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s -27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
698 (632min - 775max) MBit/s -20%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
676 (632min - 694max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mix 4
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
938 (470min - 957max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s -82%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (806min - 865max) MBit/s -11%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
697 (500min - 767max) MBit/s -26%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
660 (599min - 698max) MBit/s -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -60%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix 4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (470-957)
Xiaomi Mix 4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø856 (423-910)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

小米4在GPS(L1,L5)、Glonass(L1)、Galieo(E1,E5a)、北斗(B1,B1c,B2a)和QZSS(L1,L5)卫星导航系统的帮助下找到其当前位置。在我们的测试中,它在户外和室内都很成功,精确度高达4米(约13英尺)。

在实践中,定位精度往往可以变成甚至略好。最好的例子是我们10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车之旅,小米MIX 4记录的整个路线实际上与我们用来比较的Garmin Edge 500专业导航设备一样准确。

GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:概述
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:环湖
GPS测试:转折点
GPS测试:转折点

电话功能和语音质量

小米MIX 4的语音质量非常好。麦克风捕捉的声音很容易理解,在扬声器模式下也做得令人满意。只要服务供应商配合,Mix 4都支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

照相机 - 隐藏在显示屏下的2000万像素自拍相机

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
在常规操作中,Mix 4的显示屏下的摄像头仍然是不可见的。
在常规操作中,Mix 4的显示屏下的摄像头仍然是不可见的。
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

小米MIX 4的一个有趣的设备特征是其显示屏下的自拍相机,提供2000万像素的分辨率。它隐藏得很好,所以你在日常操作中几乎注意不到它。为了能够看到它,你必须使用一些技巧,比如用手电筒从侧面照到显示屏上。

由于摄像头必须通过显示屏拍照,所以图像质量还算不错,但并不突出。虽然它能够从物体中提取一些细节,但照片总是显得略微模糊。该相机也根本不喜欢逆光拍照。然而,它仍然是你能得到的最好的显示屏下的前置摄像头。那些只是偶尔用它进行视频聊天的人应该对它的性能相当满意。

背面的三摄像头包括一个108MP的主摄像头,带有光学图像稳定器(OIS)和三星Isocell HMX1图像传感器。此外,还有一个具有120°视角的1300万像素广角镜头和一个具有OIS和5倍光学变焦的800万像素长焦镜头。

我们已经知道108MP的主摄像头来自小米11 。小米继续优化Mix 4的软件,因为它产生的颜色和灰度比它的兄弟姐妹更准确。 然而,与这个价格级别的其他智能手机的成就相比,我们仍然没有完全被其性能所说服。在白天,Mix 4能够拍出真正好的照片,并获得很多动态的分数。但有些地方的颜色显得太冷了,有些地方的细节水平还可以更高。在周围光线较弱的情况下,这一点变得特别明显,尽管大型传感器仍然可以在这里提取大量的图像信息。

广角镜头提供了良好的图像质量,拍摄的照片细节丰富,但边缘略显模糊和颗粒感。长焦镜头做得很好,它的5倍光学变焦和光学图像稳定器使它仍能对较远的物体拍摄出清晰的照片。最大变焦水平为50倍。

Mix 4能够以4K和每秒60张图片的速度录制视频。8K记录也是可能的,但只有在24FPS下。也支持HDR。视频质量总体上相当好。通过调整变焦系数,你可以在录制时在主镜头和广角镜头之间切换。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用广角镜头拍摄的照片
用广角镜头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLowlight recording
click to load images

在受控的光线条件下拍照时,可以看出主相机能够相当准确地再现色彩,除了一些绿色和蓝色的色差。在低光照条件下,准确性明显受到影响(底色卡在1Lux的情况下),测试图只重现得相当模糊。

ColorChecker
16.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix 4: 10.09 ∆E min: 2.73 - max: 19.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.2 ∆E
47 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
35 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
43 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
57 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
57.1 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
46.4 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix 4: 39.47 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 58.61 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括120瓦的充电器

小米MIX 4的包装盒包括一个带CN插头的120瓦充电器,重量为185克(约6.5盎司),几乎和智能手机一样重。此外,还有一条USB线(Type-C-to-A),一个SIM卡工具,以及一个透明的保险套。还包括一份快速入门手册,但它要求你懂中文。

我们测试设备的供应商TradingShenzhen还包括一个免费的欧盟插头适配器与小米MIX 4。你还可以选择Flip Buds Pro蓝牙耳机或80W无线充电站等其他配件。

TradingShenzhen对小米MIX 4提供12个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 在任何时候都能顺利显示

小米MIX 4的操作是绝对流畅的。它的120赫兹面板将运动的模糊性降到最低,并创造了非常有吸引力的图像再现,整体上很容易让人感到满意。

由于Mix 4目前没有在欧洲市场提供,在 "Baidu IME for MIUI"、"iFlytek for MIUI "和 "Sagou Keyboard for MIUI "中,所有预装的键盘都只为中国用户优化。然而,一旦你通过APK文件安装了Google Play,你也可以用谷歌的Gboard等标准键盘替换中文键盘,不会有任何麻烦。在这一点上,你也可以用Chrome或Firefox等替代品替换小米浏览器。

你可以使用隐藏在AMOLED显示屏下的指纹传感器,或通过面部解锁对Mix 4进行生物识别解锁。这两种方法都能非常快速可靠地工作。然而,如果你使用面部解锁,你必须确保周围的光线足够明亮,因为否则认证可能会失败。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏 - 明亮的AMOLED面板,色彩非常准确

子像素网格
子像素网格
直流调光
直流调光

6.67英寸AMOLED显示屏具有2400 x 1080像素的分辨率,平均亮度达到808 cd/m²(APL50:最大803 cd/m²)。如果不激活亮度传感器,最大为485 cd/m²,我们在最低亮度设置下测量到约2.2 cd/m²。

AMOLED面板使用脉宽调制(PWM)来控制亮度,这对敏感用户来说可能会成为问题。在显示亮度高于88%时,PWM频率为恒定的60赫兹。在较低的亮度水平(<88%),它在163.4和510.2 Hz之间变化。

对于那些对PWM敏感的人,小米还提供了一个减少闪烁的功能(直流调光)。这在显示设置中被称为 "防闪烁模式",它将闪烁降低到恒定的60赫兹。

806
cd/m²
809
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
813
cd/m²
817
cd/m²
800
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
817
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 817 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 808 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 817 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Xiaomi Mix 4
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Oppo Find X3 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Sony Xperia 1 III
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Screen
11%
6%
-23%
-154%
Brightness middle
817
1050
29%
759
-7%
910
11%
537
-34%
Brightness
808
1058
31%
776
-4%
913
13%
539
-33%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
94
-4%
98
0%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1
-0%
0.8
20%
2
-100%
4.78
-378%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.4
-9%
1.8
18%
3.1
-41%
7.83
-256%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.5
17%
1.6
11%
2.2
-22%
5.8
-222%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.06 107%
2.363 93%
CCT
6511 100%
6504 100%
6512 100%
6512 100%
7982 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

你可以通过选择 "鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "原色 "色彩方案来调整Mix 4的色彩再现,还可以选择调整色彩空间和RGB平衡。然而,你并不真的需要那么多的微调,因为选择 "原色 "方案就已经足够了。然后,Mix 4将显示灰度和特别的颜色,几乎与原始色调一样,色温将遵循理想线,色彩平衡将几乎完美。

色彩准确性("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩准确性("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
饱和度("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
饱和度("原色 "方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外,Mix 4自然得益于其高显示亮度。尽管有一些反射,但即使在阳光直射下,你也可以很容易地看到显示内容,在阴暗处也完全没有问题。

在阴天的情况下户外使用
在阴天的情况下户外使用
在阴天的情况下户外使用
在阴天的情况下户外使用

Mix 4的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在非常陡峭的视角下,你也能轻易看到内容。作为典型的OLED面板,颜色可能会稍微偏向绿色或蓝色,但这对可读性没有影响。

性能--小米MIX 4搭载骁龙888+处理器

Mix 4在性能方面使用了重磅炸弹,因为其 骁龙888+ 5G属于最快的移动Mobil SoCs。此外,高端的Adreno 660图形芯片和12GB的LPDDR5-RAM也确保没有性能瓶颈。如果你购买存储量较小的Mix 4版本,如8GB内存和128GB存储的型号,你也可以这样认为。

在合成基准测试中,小米MIX 4和其他可比的智能手机之间只有很小的差别。的 奥普Find X3 Pro(骁龙888 5G)和 三星Galaxy S21 Ultra与它的 三星Exynos 2100 5G性能几乎与骁龙888+处于同一水平。其他配备骁龙888+的智能手机,如华硕ROG Phone 5s和 努比亚RedMagic 6S Pro在一些基准测试中表现更好。

在浏览器性能方面,Mix 4能够获得小的优势,但这也可能是由于谷歌浏览器的最新版本。然而,Mix 4无法超越 Apple iPhone 13 Pro.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1749 Points +55%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1123 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1134 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1076 - 1170, n=6)
1143 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -19%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3613 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4829 Points +34%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3535 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3629 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (3286 - 3675, n=6)
3572 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -17%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6211 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4415 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6252 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4124 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (3646 - 6664, n=6)
5544 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points -32%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4848 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4656 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
7400 Points +53%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4662 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4158 - 4865, n=6)
4681 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points -16%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14214 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14339 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11705 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (12136 - 18567, n=6)
15268 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9174 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
7773 Points -15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8768 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9245 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10642 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (9174 - 11389, n=5)
10572 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13387 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
31940 Points +139%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13647 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
13273 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
15592 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (13387 - 17018, n=5)
15530 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4365 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2130 Points -51%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3895 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4483 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5041 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4365 - 5293, n=5)
4994 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7906 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5956 Points -25%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9540 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6110 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (7906 - 9553, n=6)
8770 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6789 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10256 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
16221 Points +58%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12394 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10037 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (10256 - 12752, n=6)
11447 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)
9811 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4387 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1852 Points -58%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5283 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
2579 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4387 - 5260, n=6)
4898 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)
4236 Points -3%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4285 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
9386 Points +119%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5657 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points +34%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5851 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4285 - 5895, n=6)
5536 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=134, last 2 years)
2569 Points -40%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4274 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
11700 Points +174%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5721 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points +37%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5850 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (4274 - 5875, n=6)
5541 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=202, last 2 years)
6307 Points +48%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1161 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3059 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1871 Points +61%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1497 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1161 - 1564, n=6)
1475 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=206, last 2 years)
1697 Points +46%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1147 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2864 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1758 Points +53%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1423 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1147 - 1532, n=6)
1447 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=201, last 2 years)
1705 Points +49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
120 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (91 - 121, n=3)
110.7 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps -29%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
197 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
417 fps +112%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
230 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (161 - 197, n=3)
184 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +25%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
113 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -47%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (81 - 127, n=4)
102.5 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps -36%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
134 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
229 fps +71%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
127 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (92 - 141, n=4)
124 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +5%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
83 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -28%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (54 - 94, n=4)
76.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
88 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
151 fps +72%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
93 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (62 - 95, n=4)
83.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
52 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps +15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (35 - 53, n=4)
45.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -17%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
95 fps +73%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (42 - 62, n=4)
52.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +9%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
38 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
53 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (42 - 65, n=6)
56.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44 fps -28%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
65 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
119 fps +83%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
72 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps +6%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (39 - 81, n=6)
65.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -1%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
37 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps +62%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
25 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
37 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (31 - 41, n=6)
36.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 118, n=225, last 2 years)
32.9 fps -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
24 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39 fps +63%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps +17%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (19 - 30, n=6)
24.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +7%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
815115 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800608 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
749520 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (794271 - 829929, n=3)
813105 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -9%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
712952 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
673630 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
633158 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (695964 - 725649, n=3)
711522 Points 0%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28727 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
105536 Points +267%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
241222 Points +740%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (27321 - 286905, n=3)
114318 Points +298%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6412 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
0 Points -100%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6822 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (5711 - 7123, n=4)
6407 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10746 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11438 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (8546 - 11096, n=4)
10063 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7461 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8220 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (5648 - 7941, n=4)
6905 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points -16%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11374 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14211 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (11374 - 15524, n=4)
13894 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +24%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mix 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1853 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1621 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
  (1665 - 1882, n=4)
1782 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -19%


Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
181.6 Points +45%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
125.4 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (75.9 - 125.4, n=4)
98.4 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.6 Points -39%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.7 Points +90%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
218.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (108.5 - 218, n=3)
159.8 Points -27%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
139.4 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.3 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
243 runs/min +113%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
114 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (79.8 - 114, n=3)
91.5 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min -26%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
248 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
165 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (120 - 165, n=3)
144 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points -20%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
129 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
64222 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
49046 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (28695 - 49046, n=4)
38237 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points -31%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
27914 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1786 ms * -55%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
1646 ms * -43%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G (1118 - 1443, n=4)
1267 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Mix 4 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1149 ms *
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

小米MIX 4的UFS-3.1存储实现了整个读写速度非常高。然而,小米MIX 4的 三星Galaxy S21 Ultra还是快了一点。

Xiaomi Mix 4Oppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 UltraSony Xperia 1 IIIAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
15%
6%
21%
6%
Sequential Read 256KB
1938
1779
-8%
1710
-12%
1948
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
751
759
1%
1077
43%
742
-1%
Random Read 4KB
242.1
273.3
13%
316.7
31%
267.8
11%
Random Write 4KB
284.2
267.1
-6%
279.5
-2%
316.8
11%

游戏--120赫兹的屏幕没有自动优势

120赫兹的显示屏,丰富的性能,以及双扬声器,使小米MIX 4基本上成为游戏的好选择。虽然游戏在高细节水平下也能顺利运行,但并不总能保证其运行速度达到120帧/秒。如果我们以PUBG Mobile为例,在相对温和的HD/High设置下,即使刷新率设置为120Hz,也不可能超过30FPS。

我们用Gamebench确定帧率.不幸的是,除了《PUBG Mobile》之外,其他游戏无法用该工具进行测试。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix 4; 1.7.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放--混合4中的混合双扬声器

温度

小米MIX 4在运行过程中保持凉爽,即使经过一个小时的压力测试,表面也只升温到最高30.4℃(87°F)。

这款智能手机也能很好地控制其内部温度。在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中,Mix 4取得了接近100%的成绩,而且在整个测试过程中,基准结果几乎总是保持不变。我们还想分析一下GFXBench的压力测试,但该应用程序总是在显示结果之前崩溃。

Max. Load
 31 °C31 °C29.4 °C 
 30.8 °C30.6 °C28.9 °C 
 30.4 °C30.5 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 31 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
29.2 °C30.2 °C30.2 °C
28.4 °C29 °C30.4 °C
26.7 °C27.8 °C30.4 °C
Maximum: 30.4 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  24.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix 4
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 (25.5min) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix 4
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 (7.17min) %
0510152025Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix 4; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.19 (7.17-7.23)
Xiaomi Mix 4; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.5-25.8)

演讲者

从Mix 4的外观来看,它似乎只有一个扬声器。然而,实际上你会得到一个立体声,因为位于显示屏下方的听筒被用作第二个扬声器。有了这个,Mix 4产生的声音在低音方面很差,但总体上非常清晰和平衡。只有在最大音量时才会有轻微失真。你可以通过蓝牙5.2或USB-C适配器连接外部音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.836.82524303116.130.34027.628.55032.333.16323.427.1802227.51002227.51252130.916017.945.720013.348.125015.250.931513.25840011.557.950012.266.963012.372.180013.374.4100014.576.1125012.275.1160011.276.2200011.778.3250012.179.4315012.781.7400013.678.9500013.174.9630013.672.1800013.169.51000013.667.11250013.663.71600013.558.5SPL2588.8N0.672.6median 13.3median 72.1Delta1.39.130.825.822.62619.223.721.424.132.83618.624.218.123.715.427.710.739.41756.114.954.313.25812.562.311.565.710.566.89.968.311.971.110.676.213.676.81471.212.972.511.773.512.978.913.180.113.377.113.873.21479.513.574.414.272.51763.425880.675median 13.2median 72.51.27hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix 4Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix 4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 25分钟后完全充电

消耗功率

小米MIX 4可以使用附带的120瓦充电器进行充电。它的重量为185克(约6.5盎司),几乎和智能手机一样重。然而,不仅是重量令人印象深刻,而且充电功率也很高。

在我们的测试中,空的电池只用了36分钟就被完全充电到100%。如果你激活 "提升充电速度 "选项,速度会更快,充电时间会减少到25分钟,几乎在12分钟后已经达到50%的电量,19分钟后达到80%。当充电助推器被激活时,智能手机会明显发热,但绝不会出现令人不舒服的温度。

在小米MIX 4的充电过程中,我们没有发现任何明显的行为。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.12 / 1.04 / 1.23 Watt
Load midlight 3.04 / 7.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mix 4
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-72%
-178%
-189%
-106%
-162%
Idle Minimum *
0.12
0.51
-325%
0.93
-675%
1.06
-783%
0.65 ?(0.12 - 1.05, n=4)
-442%
Idle Average *
1.04
1.54
-48%
1.54
-48%
1.19
-14%
1.353 ?(0.9 - 1.75, n=4)
-30%
Idle Maximum *
1.23
1.57
-28%
1.69
-37%
1.2
2%
1.565 ?(1.23 - 1.78, n=4)
-27%
Load Average *
3.04
3.06
-1%
6.38
-110%
6.46
-113%
4.03 ?(2.76 - 7, n=4)
-33%
Load Maximum *
7.84
4.59
41%
9.58
-22%
10.76
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G: Ø4.68 (0.1307-10.4)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.98 (0.783-10.2)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.33 (3.57-7.13)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.84 (3.75-9.01)
Xiaomi Mix 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.943 (0.827-1.677)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.641-0.717)

电池寿命

超过15小时的网上冲浪和超过16小时的视频播放,Mix 4实现了非常好的电池寿命。除了 Apple iPhone 13 Pro耐力冠军,没有一个高端竞争对手能够跟上小米的步伐。

像往常一样,我们在亮度调整到150cd/m²的情况下进行电池测试,但我们也激活了120-Hz的屏幕刷新率。如果刷新率为60赫兹,电池寿命应该会更好。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
41h 59min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 26min
Xiaomi Mix 4
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 III
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
21%
-18%
-6%
-42%
Reader / Idle
2519
2614
4%
1408
-44%
H.264
1005
1493
49%
1310
30%
WiFi v1.3
925
993
7%
757
-18%
702
-24%
534
-42%
Load
266
333
25%
304
14%

Pros

+ 高品质玻璃和陶瓷外壳
+ 显示屏下的摄像头
+ 快速的无线局域网
+ 非常快的SoC
+ 明亮的amoled面板,120赫兹
+ 良好的立体声
+ 120瓦的充电器
+ 充电时间极短
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 自拍相机只有平均水平
- 没有音频接口
- 没有microSD插槽
- 骁龙888+在其他智能手机中速度更快

对小米MIX 4的评判

测试小米MIX 4。测试装置由TradingShenzhen提供。
测试小米MIX 4。测试装置由TradingShenzhen提供。

通过Mix 4,小米提供了一个非常好的高端智能手机。在我们的测试中,它以非常高的系统性能、120赫兹的明亮AMOLED显示屏、坚实的108万像素摄像头,以及配备快速WiFi 6E和5G双SIM卡的良好通信模块而给人留下深刻印象。凭借其高质量的玻璃/陶瓷一体式机身,Mix 4在视觉外观方面也处于第一阵营。

两个设备特性也使该智能手机在高端系列中与众不同。首先,是显示屏下的摄像头,这使得Mix 4对所有不喜欢摄像头缺口的用户都有吸引力。隐藏在显示屏下的2000万像素摄像头做得很好,但其质量并不像普通自拍相机那样高。

小米MIX 4目前只有进口货,是一款功能强大的高端智能手机,以其屏下摄像头和极快的充电速度区别于竞争对手。

第二个特点是使用120瓦的充电器进行极速充电,这也是小米11T Pro附带的。使用这个,在我们的测试中,Mix 4只需25分钟就能完全充电到100%。有了这样一个疯狂的充电速度,你既不需要给手机充电过夜,也不需要等待很长时间,直到电池有足够的电量用于日常使用。

Mix 4的缺点不多。如前所述,自拍相机的质量可以更好,但目前的屏下技术水平显然不允许在这一点上有更大的作为。缺少的音频端口可以通过USB-C适配器取代。但由于缺乏microSD插槽,你无法扩展存储。

小米MIX 4的替代品是奥普Find X3 Pro,以及三星Galaxy S21 Ultra,以及小米11T Pro等。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米MIX 4目前只能通过进口商购买,如:TradingShenzhenGiztop8GB内存和128GB存储的型号起价699美元,顶级型号(12/512GB)起价919美元。

Xiaomi Mix 4 - 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
63 / 64 → 99%
Application Performance
88 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Camera
73%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米MIX 4智能手机评测--带隐形自拍镜的高端产品
Manuel Masiero, 2021-12- 8 (Update: 2021-12- 8)