Notebookcheck

红米10X 5G智能手机评测：比肩三星S20 Ultra?

千元级双5G支持。 Redmi 10X是一款经济实惠的中端智能手机，具有漂亮的AMOLED面板和快速的联发科Dimensity 820处理器。 光学屏下指纹传感器的可靠速度令我们感到非常惊讶，该传感器在这个价格范围内非常出色，其响应速度丝毫不比三星Galaxy S20智能手机中的超声波解决方案慢。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Redmi 10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 820 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.57 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, 屏幕键盘, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频端口, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 接近传感器，加速度传感器，陀螺仪，电子罗盘, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: n1 / n3 / n41 / n78 / n79; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8 CDMA EVDO: BC0; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 CDMA 1X: BC0, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.99 x 164.2 x 75.8
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1.6 um (4 in 1), FOV 79 °) + 8 MP (telephoto, OIS) + 8 MP (wide-angle, FOV 119 °) + 5 MP (macro)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, 22.5 W充电器，USB电缆，保护套, MiUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, fanless
Weight
208 g, Power Supply: 89 g
Price
220 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5		208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2		152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.10"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3		172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
76 %
07/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610		185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G smartphone
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (495min - 650max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=657)
295 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
145 (20min - 215max) MBit/s ∼23% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Mali-G57 MP5, Dimensity 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (642min - 704max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=657)
281 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Nokia 5.3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (25min - 258max) MBit/s ∼24% -76%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (495-650)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø687 (642-704)
Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Main camera
Main camera
2x zoom
2x zoom
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
32 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 31.4 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 47.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G: 7.11 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 13.63 ∆E
598
cd/m²		601
cd/m²		605
cd/m²
599
cd/m²		608
cd/m²		611
cd/m²
608
cd/m²		620
cd/m²		622
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² Average: 608 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.57		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67		Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10		realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60		Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40		Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Screen
24%
19%
-30%
-27%
-39%
Brightness middle
608
610
0%
554
-9%
442
-27%
594
-2%
523
-14%
Brightness
608
579
-5%
559
-8%
419
-31%
613
1%
482
-21%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
92
-4%
90
-6%
89
-7%
86
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.99
1.8
55%
2
50%
6.1
-53%
6.1
-53%
6.22
-56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.65
3
74%
7.7
34%
9.7
17%
10.6
9%
10.56
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.5
24%
1.6
52%
5.9
-79%
7
-112%
8
-142%
Gamma
2.291 96%
2.31 95%
2.11 104%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.226 99%
CCT
7023 93%
6864 95%
6589 99%
7631 85%
7370 88%
8856 73%
Contrast
1649
1195
1137

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.3 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3009 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100% +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3009 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=75)
2062 Points ∼37% -31%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2456 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100% +95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2456 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=77)
1819 Points ∼38% -26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
2678 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼43% -54%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼62% -34%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼52% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼50% -47%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼47% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼65% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2856 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼98% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
2678 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=182)
1939 Points ∼68% -28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
652 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼38% -45%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼60% -13%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼34% -51%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼30% -57%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points ∼33% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼66% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
742 Points ∼79% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
652 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=182)
560 Points ∼60% -14%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
8214 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4073 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
8214 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=367)
4937 Points ∼60% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
10658 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5097 Points ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼100% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
10658 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14895, n=434)
5074 Points ∼40% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3022 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1711 Points ∼34% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼71% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100% +64%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3022 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 5099, n=434)
1551 Points ∼31% -49%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
11263 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼57% -40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼86% -10%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6775 Points ∼57% -40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼77% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
11263 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=580)
6148 Points ∼52% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
16302 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼85% -15%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8538 Points ∼52% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼89% -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
16302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=728)
6781 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3168 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼83% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼69% -28%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼78% -19%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼70% -27%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2321 Points ∼71% -27%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼84% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼95% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3168 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=224)
2632 Points ∼80% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4427 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼35% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼16% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼35% -49%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼17% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
995 Points ∼16% -78%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼49% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼90% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼100% +44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4427 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=224)
3010 Points ∼47% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4069 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼45% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼22% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼45% -43%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼24% -69%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼22% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼95% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼100% +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4069 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=224)
2650 Points ∼51% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3969 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼76% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼57% -39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼72% -23%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼61% -34%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼56% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼77% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3969 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=587)
2308 Points ∼54% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4798 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼31% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼31% -47%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼13% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼43% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼86% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼100% +72%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4798 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=587)
2344 Points ∼28% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4497 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼39% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼17% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼39% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼17% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼51% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼87% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼100% +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4497 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=588)
2154 Points ∼32% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4169 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼59% -41%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼63% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼57% -43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼99% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4169 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=614)
2211 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5991 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼37% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼14% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼37% -36%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼17% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼16% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼52% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼93% +59%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5991 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=616)
3162 Points ∼31% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5469 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼22% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼25% -66%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼24% -67%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼99% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5469 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=616)
2596 Points ∼35% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3963 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼63% -36%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼61% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3963 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=663)
2166 Points ∼53% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4769 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼29% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼12% -79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼29% -50%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼14% -77%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼12% -79%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼78% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼100% +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4769 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=663)
1909 Points ∼23% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4568 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼17% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼38% -45%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼19% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼17% -75%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼83% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼100% +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4568 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=664)
1810 Points ∼27% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3745 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼57% -42%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼67% -31%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼65% -34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼100% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3745 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=706)
2042 Points ∼53% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5996 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼36% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼11% -82%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼37% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼18% -71%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼17% -72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼95% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5996 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=705)
2563 Points ∼26% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
5267 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼49% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼27% -64%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼25% -66%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼64% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼100% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
5267 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=708)
2184 Points ∼30% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32166 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼50% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼43% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼37% -54%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼62% -24%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼51% -37%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼49% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼64% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼100% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32166 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=851)
16090 Points ∼41% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
38974 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼49% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼21% -43%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼50% +38%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼22% -41%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼14% -60%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼65% +79%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼79% +117%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
38974 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=849)
29337 Points ∼28% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
37153 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼31% -44%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼50% -9%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼35% -37%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼36% -35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼66% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼92% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼100% +82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
37153 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=849)
22458 Points ∼33% -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
115 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼23% -66%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼51% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼87% +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
115 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=842)
49.5 fps ∼30% -57%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
60 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼34% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
60 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=851)
32.9 fps ∼30% -45%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
71 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼41% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼96% +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
71 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=747)
29.6 fps ∼30% -58%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
57 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼43% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼22% -65%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼42% -33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼56% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼67% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
57 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 119, n=755)
24.2 fps ∼27% -58%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
52 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼19% -75%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% -42%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼55% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼94% +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
52 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=610)
23.6 fps ∼34% -55%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
44 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼21% -70%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼44% -39%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼56% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼100% +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
44 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=612)
21 fps ∼34% -52%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
18 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14% -73%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼32% -39%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼13% -75%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼26% -51%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼71% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
18 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=379)
12 fps ∼35% -33%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
12 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼31% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼32% -42%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼13% -76%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼13% -77%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼39% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼73% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼100% +83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
12 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=377)
8.36 fps ∼38% -30%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼35% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼15% -74%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼29% -52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼43% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼76% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼100% +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 64, n=383)
17.9 fps ∼37% -38%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
32 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼42% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼17% -77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼44% -41%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼20% -72%
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼19% -74%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼56% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼95% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼100% +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
32 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=383)
20.5 fps ∼48% -36%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
29 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼19% -72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼43% -38%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼90% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
29 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=535)
15.7 fps ∼37% -46%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
25 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼45% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼20% -69%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% -36%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼89% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
25 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=539)
13.8 fps ∼36% -45%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
401419 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼52% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼30% -61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼52% -31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
440822 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼100% +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
401419 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 700592, n=159)
330483 Points ∼63% -18%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4420 Score ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1164 Score ∼23% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4420 Score ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=102)
2592 Score ∼52% -41%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
1407 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼74% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼86% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼100% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
1407 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=772)
847 Points ∼59% -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
4264 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼35% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼10% -74%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼35% -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼49% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼87% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼100% +150%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
4264 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=772)
2674 Points ∼25% -37%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3996 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼92% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼44% -46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼94% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼78% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3996 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=772)
2009 Points ∼41% -50%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
7258 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼57% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼74% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼94% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼100% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
7258 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=772)
3631 Points ∼40% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5, 8192
3636 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼40% -48%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼73% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼82% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 
3636 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=772)
1870 Points ∼39% -49%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼100% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
45 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
44.974 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=234)
43.3 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼68% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
86.647 Points ∼97%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
86.6 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼62% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=666)
50.8 Points ∼57% -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
47.6 runs/min ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
47.6 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212)
45.5 runs/min ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼58% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=304)
71.4 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼99% +9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
65 Points ∼91%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
65 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼73% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
18974 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
18974 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼91% -9%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼55% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=837)
8521 Points ∼45% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=863)
9434 ms * ∼100% -211%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼40% -25%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼32% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85)
3032.1 ms * ∼32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
3032 ms * ∼32% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼30% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy A41realme 6 ProOppo A91Nokia 5.3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-44%
-31%
-43%
-45%
-31%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42)
-7%
51.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=572)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42)
-10%
69.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=572)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
289.64
112.93
-61%
72.53
-75%
154
-47%
28.55
-90%
45.2
-84%
115 (18.2 - 290, n=74)
-60%
41.8 (0.14 - 319, n=947)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
239.4
122.58
-49%
84
-65%
158.66
-34%
145.64
-39%
109.1
-54%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=74)
-40%
64.5 (1.59 - 325, n=947)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
479.45
171.09
-64%
211.05
-56%
203.28
-58%
185.26
-61%
243.2
-49%
250 (182 - 511, n=74)
-48%
144 (2.99 - 1321, n=947)
-70%
Sequential Read 256KB
999.36
498.15
-50%
299.89
-70%
512.61
-49%
505.44
-49%
299.5
-70%
779 (427 - 999, n=74)
-22%
371 (12.1 - 2037, n=947)
-63%
PUBG mobile
010203040506070Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-61)
; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
; HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø60.3 (59-61)
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Max. Load
 43.5 °C41.3 °C37.4 °C 
 42.6 °C41 °C37.4 °C 
 41.3 °C39.7 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
32.8 °C39.2 °C40.7 °C
33.7 °C39.2 °C40 °C
34.2 °C39 °C39.5 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.538.52536.236.63127.326.44033.536.35033.434.56323.524.68022.619.81002223.112520.824.416017.936.920013.341.425012.24531512.249.940012.455.150013.459.863013.464.980017.666.5100016.670.6125014.369.1160012.569.720001367.7250013.864.4315014.857.2400016.661.6500017.367.5630018.271.980001975.31000019.668.31250019.655.51600020.352.3SPL57.366.228.380.5N11.119.5146.9median 16.6median 61.6Delta2.710.734.829.419.626.323.92524.324.730.533.418.726.820.422.518.621.417.517.419.532.919.239.416.448.315.254.314.25714.760.413.862.514.66714.168.613.568.414.473.113.976.513.878.413.873.714.772.414.275.414.473.714.974.61563.415.152.315.350.126.585.50.859.7median 14.7median 63.40.813.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 10X 5GSamsung Galaxy A41
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 5.1 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
4520 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh		realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Oppo A91
4025 mAh		Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 820
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
33%
13%
32%
0%
21%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.75
53%
0.96
40%
0.92
42%
0.82
49%
1.6
-0%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=936)
44%
Idle Average *
1.9
2.19
-15%
1.57
17%
1.79
6%
1.73
9%
1.9
-0%
1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=935)
8%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.24
-7%
1.61
23%
1.88
10%
1.75
17%
2.1
-0%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=936)
3%
Load Average *
5.1
3.88
24%
2.93
43%
5.41
-6%
2.33
54%
5.1
-0%
4.14 (0.8 - 10.8, n=930)
19%
Load Maximum *
8.9
5.97
33%
4.97
44%
7.59
15%
5.97
33%
8.9
-0%
6.15 (1.2 - 14.2, n=930)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 24min
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
4520 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh		realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Oppo A91
4025 mAh		Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
804
1175
46%
650
-19%
1031
28%
605
-25%
876
9%

Pros

+ 快速指纹读取器
+ 明亮的OLED面板
+ 快速SoC
+ 快速WLAN
+ 做工
+ 续航时间长
+ 快速的UFS存储

Cons

- 进口限制
- 轻微降频
- 只有60 Hz的面板

总结——一台优秀的红米手机：

Testing the Redmi 10X 5G. Test unit provided by tradingshenzhen.
Testing the Redmi 10X 5G. Test unit provided by tradingshenzhen.

由于采用了联发科Dimensity 820，Redmi 10X的5G版本是一款价格较低的中端智能手机。 Redmi智能手机的起步价目前为200欧元（约233美元），具有相对较高的性能，快速的存储和快速的WLAN。 此外，还配有优秀的屏下指纹，并且是同类价格中可能是最快的指纹传感器之一。

Redmi 10X是一款出色的200欧元（〜233美元）智能手机。

不幸的是，Redmi 10X 5G不太可能找到进入欧洲的正式途径，从而迫使您接受进口和中文版MiUI的限制。

Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - 09/18/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
87%
Games Performance
44 / 64 → 69%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 74%
Camera
69%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 红米10X 5G智能手机评测：比肩三星S20 Ultra?
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-02- 2 (Update: 2021-02- 2)