红米10X 5G智能手机评测:比肩三星S20 Ultra?
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (FOV 78.5 °)
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 02/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2400x1080 | |
83 % | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79 % | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2 | 152 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 | |
80 % | 06/2020 | realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
79 % | 01/2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
76 % | 07/2020 | Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.55" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=657) | |
Oppo A91 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Oppo A91 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=657) | |
Nokia 5.3 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel

|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 608 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.57 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10 | realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60 | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40 | Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.55 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 24% | 19% | -30% | -27% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 608 | 610 0% | 554 -9% | 442 -27% | 594 -2% | 523 -14% |
Brightness | 608 | 579 -5% | 559 -8% | 419 -31% | 613 1% | 482 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 92 -4% | 92 -4% | 90 -6% | 89 -7% | 86 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.46 | |||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 3.99 | 1.8 55% | 2 50% | 6.1 -53% | 6.1 -53% | 6.22 -56% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 11.65 | 3 74% | 7.7 34% | 9.7 17% | 10.6 9% | 10.56 9% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.3 | 2.5 24% | 1.6 52% | 5.9 -79% | 7 -112% | 8 -142% |
Gamma | 2.291 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.226 99% |
CCT | 7023 93% | 6864 95% | 6589 99% | 7631 85% | 7370 88% | 8856 73% |
Contrast | 1649 | 1195 | 1137 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 227.3 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms). |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7514, n=75) | |
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6524, n=77) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo A91 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=182) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo A91 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=182) |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=367) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14895, n=434) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 5099, n=434) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo A91 | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=580) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=728) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=842) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=851) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=747) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 119, n=755) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=610) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=612) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=102) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=234) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=666) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=212) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=304) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=837) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=863) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A41 | realme 6 Pro | Oppo A91 | Nokia 5.3 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -41% | -44% | -31% | -43% | -45% | -31% | -55% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -15% | 67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4% | 63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2% | 60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7% | 60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6% | 60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42) -7% | 51.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=572) -20% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9% | 83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2% | 86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -9% | 77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8% | 76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42) -10% | 69.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=572) -18% |
Random Write 4KB | 289.64 | 112.93 -61% | 72.53 -75% | 154 -47% | 28.55 -90% | 45.2 -84% | 115 (18.2 - 290, n=74) -60% | 41.8 (0.14 - 319, n=947) -86% |
Random Read 4KB | 239.4 | 122.58 -49% | 84 -65% | 158.66 -34% | 145.64 -39% | 109.1 -54% | 144 (92.6 - 239, n=74) -40% | 64.5 (1.59 - 325, n=947) -73% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 479.45 | 171.09 -64% | 211.05 -56% | 203.28 -58% | 185.26 -61% | 243.2 -49% | 250 (182 - 511, n=74) -48% | 144 (2.99 - 1321, n=947) -70% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 999.36 | 498.15 -50% | 299.89 -70% | 512.61 -49% | 505.44 -49% | 299.5 -70% | 779 (427 - 999, n=74) -22% | 371 (12.1 - 2037, n=947) -63% |
PUBG mobile
Dead Trigger 2
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | 33% | 13% | 32% | 0% | 21% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.75 53% | 0.96 40% | 0.92 42% | 0.82 49% | 1.6 -0% | 0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=936) 44% | |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 2.19 -15% | 1.57 17% | 1.79 6% | 1.73 9% | 1.9 -0% | 1.757 (0.6 - 6.2, n=935) 8% | |
Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.24 -7% | 1.61 23% | 1.88 10% | 1.75 17% | 2.1 -0% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=936) 3% | |
Load Average * | 5.1 | 3.88 24% | 2.93 43% | 5.41 -6% | 2.33 54% | 5.1 -0% | 4.14 (0.8 - 10.8, n=930) 19% | |
Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 5.97 33% | 4.97 44% | 7.59 15% | 5.97 33% | 8.9 -0% | 6.15 (1.2 - 14.2, n=930) 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 804 | 1175 46% | 650 -19% | 1031 28% | 605 -25% | 876 9% |
Pros
Cons
总结——一台优秀的红米手机:
由于采用了联发科Dimensity 820,Redmi 10X的5G版本是一款价格较低的中端智能手机。 Redmi智能手机的起步价目前为200欧元(约233美元),具有相对较高的性能,快速的存储和快速的WLAN。 此外,还配有优秀的屏下指纹,并且是同类价格中可能是最快的指纹传感器之一。
Redmi 10X是一款出色的200欧元(〜233美元)智能手机。
不幸的是,Redmi 10X 5G不太可能找到进入欧洲的正式途径,从而迫使您接受进口和中文版MiUI的限制。
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - 09/18/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich