小米红米10C智能手机评测--入门级手机的色彩还原度很高

Name: Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Brand: Xiaomi

还是你更喜欢Redmi Note 11？ 红米10C再次明显比具有相同SoC的Redmi Note 11便宜。是值得节省几欧元，还是应该投资于更昂贵的红米？我们在对红米10C的评测中找到答案。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/22/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 10C (Redmi 10 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.71 inch 20.6:9, 1650 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

, 55 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, light sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 169.6 x 76.6

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, 10 Watt charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, fanless

Weight

190 g

Price

150 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
76.6 %	07/2022	Xiaomi Redmi 10C SD 680, Adreno 610	190 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.71"	1650x720
75.1 %	05/2022	Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320	185 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
80 %	05/2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SD 680, Adreno 610	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
75.8 %	07/2022	Samsung Galaxy M13 Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1	192 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
73.8 %	02/2022	Xiaomi Redmi 9C Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320	196 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	1600x720

外壳和功能 - 受大猩猩玻璃保护

尽管红米10C目前几乎在所有地方都有折扣，但制造商的建议零售价如下。

64GB大容量存储/3GB内存：169.90欧元
64GB大容量存储/4GB内存：179.90欧元
128GB大容量存储/4GB内存：199.90欧元

在测试时，最大的版本只在网上零售商如amazon.de提供。，而64GB的版本也是直接从小米公司https://www.mi.com/de/product/redmi-10c/?skupanel=1.价格上的差异与Redmi Note 11同样的内存配置，价格相差20至30欧元。

红米10C采用塑料外壳，其笨重的相机模块也给人留下了相当深刻的印象，尽管这里有很多展示，因为小米红米10C实际上只包括一个摄像头。一个在触觉上也很明显的对角线图案贯穿了磨砂光泽的背面，它相当巧妙地隐藏了指纹，至少在我们的蓝色测试设备中是这样。其他颜色选择是绿色和灰色。

外壳建造得非常坚固，缝隙很小，大猩猩3号玻璃保护着屏幕。对外壳的压力只能部分地传到屏幕上，否则，智能手机看起来很耐看。

用于移动支付服务的NFC，以及蓝牙5.0都已安装。除了2张SIM卡之外，还可以使用microSD读卡器。在我们用参考的microSD Angelbird V60进行的测试中，该智能手机表现得相当好，对卡的读写速度非常快。

尺寸比较

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C (Angelbird V60)	34.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Angelbird V60)	28.5 MB/s -18%
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years)	28.4 MB/s -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	24.74 MB/s -29%
Motorola Moto G22 (Angelbird V60)	24.3 MB/s -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C (Angelbird V60)	21.15 MB/s -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)

Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.4 (25.6-49.1)

Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31 (18.9-38.9)

Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (26-47.6)

Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)

Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.4 (38.4-81.8)

Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.7 (31.5-53.6)

Xiaomi Redmi 9C PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (15.2-76.3)

通信、软件和操作 - 更新至2025年

WiFi 5已经上马，这对这个价格范围来说是很平常的。与前代产品相比，红米10C现在在WLAN速度上有明显的优势，超过了红米9C，以及该价格范围内的其他设备，如摩托G22，传输数据甚至更快一些。

可用的4G频率足以在欧洲国家旅行，但红米10C不能用于全球移动互联网。在我们的测试中，接收效果一般，不能总是跟上高端智能手机。5G通常只适用于MSRP超过200欧元（约200美元）的手机，所以红米10C也不得不没有它。

基于Android 11的MIUI 13已经预装在红米10C上。安全补丁是从2022年6月初开始的，因此仍然是相当最新的。 Android 12应该还是会在今年到来。将会有另一个Android 版本，每90天进行一次安全更新，直到2025年2月。

60赫兹的屏幕很容易使用，在角落里也很敏感。指纹传感器不同寻常地集成在相机模块中。左撇子用食指接触它比右撇子要困难一些。即使在待机状态下，扫描仪也能在短暂的等待后可靠地解锁智能手机。二维面部识别也可用于解锁。该软件解决方案在光线较弱的环境中也能很好地工作，但它可以被欺骗，从而使它不那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 802.11 b/g/n	47.7 (14^min - 69^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 802.11 b/g/n	35.8 (19^min - 52^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G22 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	370 (351^min - 376^max) MBit/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy M13 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	328 (286^min - 348^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	322 (162^min - 386^max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	315 (269^min - 336^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto G22 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	326 (305^min - 332^max) MBit/s +47%
Samsung Galaxy M13 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	325 (301^min - 333^max) MBit/s +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	298 (198^min - 345^max) MBit/s +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	222 (194^min - 242^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi 10C; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø222 (194-242)

Xiaomi Redmi 10C; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (269-336)

照相机 - 只有一个可用的镜头

主摄像头的5000万像素传感器是三星的ISOCELL JN1，它也被用于 Redmi Note 11.红米10C没有广角摄像头，前代产品的微距镜头也被省略了。只有一个支持拍摄人像景深的镜头仍然可用。

红米10C的照片有点缺乏动态，所以明亮的地方很快就会过亮，而照片在恶劣的天气下看起来很暗。在非常低的光线下，红米10C确实能做到体面的增亮，但代价是严重的图像噪音。放大后的细节看起来相当粗糙。

视频最多能以1080p和30帧录制。亮度调节工作略微延迟，但总体上很好。自动对焦的效果也很好，但需要进行一些调整。

前置摄像头的分辨率为500万像素，拍摄的照片还不错，即使不放大也显得有点粗糙。你可以看到表面的细节有明显的颗粒感，在黑暗区域几乎看不到任何精细的结构。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

显示 - 只有720p和60 Hz，但没有PWM

IPS屏幕的分辨率为720p。多花一点钱，你可以得到 Redmi Note 11已经有一个1080p的OLED屏幕，而 Galaxy M13也能以更高的分辨率大放异彩，但它也依赖于LCD屏幕。

红米10C的屏幕亮度足以满足日常使用，当你选择 "标准 "作为配色方案时，你甚至可以在屏幕上获得非常准确的颜色。响应时间对游戏玩家来说会太长，但至少我们没有测量到任何PWM闪烁，这是一个问题，在 Redmi Note 11是存在的。


485 cd/m²	501 cd/m²	465 cd/m²
478 cd/m²	511 cd/m²	452 cd/m²
478 cd/m²	501 cd/m²	429 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 511 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 477.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.57 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 511 cd/m²
Contrast: 1217:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.266

	Xiaomi Redmi 10C IPS, 1650x720, 6.71	Motorola Moto G22 IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Samsung Galaxy M13 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi 9C IPS, 1600x720, 6.53
Response Times		-51%	95%	26%	-72%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	33 ?(17, 16)	46 ?(25, 21) -39%	1.135 ?(1.121, 1.148) 97%	27 ?(14, 13) 18%	60 ?(27, 33) -82%
Response Time Black / White *	21 ?(9, 12)	34 ?(19, 15) -62%	1.635 ?(0.831, 0.8045) 92%	14 ?(9, 5) 33%	34 ?(17, 17) -62%
PWM Frequency			171.4		17120
Screen		-86%	33%	-66%	-74%
Brightness middle	511	451 -12%	702 37%	481 -6%	467 -9%
Brightness	478	431 -10%	701 47%	444 -7%	417 -13%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	98 17%	85 1%	83 -1%
Black Level *	0.42	0.5 -19%		0.43 -2%	0.53 -26%
Contrast	1217	902 -26%		1119 -8%	881 -28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.51	5.82 -285%	1 34%	4.55 -201%	4.14 -174%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.53	9.3 -268%	2.3 9%	7.86 -211%	8.49 -236%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	5 -72%	1.4 52%	5.5 -90%	6 -107%
Gamma	2.266 ^97%	2.776 ^79%	2.2 ^100%	2.233 ^99%	2.291 ^96%
CCT	6443 ^101%	7683 ^85%	6520 ^100%	7969 ^82%	7536 ^86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-69% / -79%	64% / 48%	-20% / -47%	-73% / -74%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 充电器太弱

在性能方面，红米10C与它的前辈相比可以有很大的飞跃。一方面，这是由于更快的UFS 2.2内存，缩短了充电和等待时间，另一方面，该机的骁龙680，为这个价格范围提供了良好的性能。由于显示屏的分辨率较低，在游戏方面甚至有优势，所以你能得到的帧数比在 Redmi Note 11中，它也配备了骁龙680.

总的来说，你不应该期望在日常使用中出现奇迹，但它通常足以让系统平稳运行。然而，由于60赫兹的屏幕，你必须在操作的感知反应性方面做出一些让步。即使在连续负载的情况下，智能手机也几乎不发热。

底部边缘的小型单声道扬声器很难再现低中音，但即使在最大音量下，它在高音区也相当平衡，所以你绝对可以听音乐。有一个用于耳机的3.5毫米接口，以及蓝牙5.0，它可以使用各种编解码器，包括LHDC和aptX TWS+。

该智能手机可以处理18瓦的充电功率，但不幸的是，包装中只包括一个10瓦的充电器。这是小米的弱点，如果客户想在此基础上购买一个更快的充电器，可能会产生额外的电子垃圾。使用随附的充电器，充满5000毫安时的电池也需要远远超过2:30小时；使用更快的充电器，你可以将充电时间减少到2小时左右。

在电池充满的情况下，在手机不得不再次插电之前，可以在WLAN上冲浪约15小时。这是同类产品的典型值，与前代产品的水平非常相似。根据使用情况，2天不充电似乎是现实的。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	377 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	172 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	384 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	119 Points -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	149 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 384, n=14)	373 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +142%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1644 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	947 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1738 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	519 Points -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	538 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=14)	1580 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +82%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5884 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4922 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7694 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	4894 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	5208 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=14)	6497 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points +100%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2185 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	921 Points -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2085 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	843 Points -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (975 - 2254, n=10)	2051 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +328%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2054 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	851 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1931 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	799 Points -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1425 - 2187, n=10)	1990 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +696%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2810 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1292 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2589 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1043 Points -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (463 - 2866, n=10)	2480 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1353 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	453 Points -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1365 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	887 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	445 Points -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1231 - 1441, n=13)	1342 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1177 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	383 Points -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1188 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	768 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	377 Points -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1077 - 1273, n=13)	1170 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2831 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1265 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2683 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1930 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1194 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2301 - 2930, n=13)	2708 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1350 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	536 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1372 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	920 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	491 Points -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (267 - 1429, n=14)	1264 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +399%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1175 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	460 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1199 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	793 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	425 Points -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (240 - 1309, n=14)	1130 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +727%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2825 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1283 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2573 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2084 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1073 Points -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (441 - 2853, n=14)	2386 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +50%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	450 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	447 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	507 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (437 - 589, n=14)	461 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)	2555 Points +468%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	438 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	435 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	509 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (417 - 574, n=14)	448 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)	6280 Points +1334%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	127 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	139 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (22 - 130, n=15)	115.6 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 5226, n=207, last 2 years)	1689 Points +1284%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	124 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	139 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (112 - 130, n=13)	122.4 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)	1698 Points +1292%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	17 fps
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	7 fps -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	8.8 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	5.3 fps -69%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	7.5 fps -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=14)	9.51 fps -44%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +159%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	9.5 fps
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4 fps -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	9.8 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	6.1 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.1 fps -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=14)	9.08 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +577%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	10 fps
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	5 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	3.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.8 fps -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=14)	5.65 fps -43%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +228%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3.2 fps
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1.5 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	2.2 fps -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 9C Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1.5 fps -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=14)	3.07 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +700%

	Xiaomi Redmi 10C	Motorola Moto G22	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11	Samsung Galaxy M13	Xiaomi Redmi 9C	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-79%	7%	-71%	-67%	-5%	82%
Sequential Read 256KB	927.7	215.45 -77%	895.34 -3%	264.5 -71%	263.1 -72%	758 ?(485 - 940, n=17) -18%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 63%
Sequential Write 256KB	510.2	112.78 -78%	519.23 2%	193.5 -62%	208.4 -59%	400 ?(120.6 - 519, n=17) -22%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 119%
Random Read 4KB	120.2	39.32 -67%	172.95 44%	42.5 -65%	54.5 -55%	154.9 ?(88.5 - 220, n=17) 29%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 105%
Random Write 4KB	195.2	16.34 -92%	163.29 -16%	30.3 -84%	39.7 -80%	176.3 ?(95.4 - 216, n=17) -10%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 39%

温度

Max. Load

Idle


37.7 °C	32.8 °C	31.7 °C
37.2 °C	33.3 °C	32.1 °C
36.5 °C	32.7 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 34 °C


30.4 °C	32.4 °C	35.5 °C
30.4 °C	32.8 °C	37.1 °C
31 °C	32.7 °C	38.7 °C

Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 33.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy M13 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G22 5000 mAh	1101 min +21%
Average of class Smartphone (424 - 2844, n=228, last 2 years)	914 min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C 5000 mAh	908 min
Xiaomi Redmi 9C 5000 mAh	905 min 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13 5000 mAh	895 min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	842 min -7%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		15h 08min

Pros

+ 稳定的外壳，良好的设计

+ 快速的microSD读卡器

+ 许多蓝牙音频编解码器

+ 承诺的长更新周期

+ 良好的性能值

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 盒子里的充电器很弱

- 只有720p的屏幕

- 预装了臃肿的软件

- 低照度照片的图像噪音严重

结论 - 节省设备

小米红米10C是一款低于200欧元（约200美元）的廉价智能手机，在同类产品中具有相当高的系统性能。电池的运行时间让我们信服。此外，即使在负载情况下，手机也几乎不发热，在正确的设置下可以在屏幕上显示相当准确的颜色。

令人讨厌的是，小米包括一个弱的充电器，预装了许多广告应用程序，并且只安装了60赫兹的面板。在这个价格范围内有更好的例子。

小米红米10C是一款适合预算买家的手机，功能有些简陋。然而，性能和电池寿命是令人信服的。

是的，与红米10C相比，你可以节省几欧元。 Redmi Note 11.但如果你不介意AMOLED屏幕的闪烁，你将得到一个广角摄像头，更高的显示分辨率，更快的帧速率，更快的充电，以及更快的Wi-Fi。

价格和可用性

在小米的网上商店你可以买到64GB版本的手机，在测试时的零售价上有20欧元的折扣，即分别约为150和160欧元。

在测试时，互联网上也有类似的优惠，例如，在我们的借阅处notebooksbilliger.de或amazon.de

带有128GB数据存储的变体可从不同的互联网零售商处获得，价格约为160欧元，例如，amazon.de.

Xiaomi Redmi 10C - 2022-07-21 07/21/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 65%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

88%

Games Performance

15 / 64 → 23%

Application Performance

63 / 86 → 73%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

60 / 90 → 67%

Camera

48%

Average

71%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米红米10C智能手机评测--入门级手机的色彩还原度很高

Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-22 (Update: 2022-07-22)

小米红米10C智能手机评测--入门级手机的色彩还原度很高

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和功能 - 受大猩猩玻璃保护

尺寸比较

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

通信、软件和操作 - 更新至2025年

照相机 - 只有一个可用的镜头

显示 - 只有720p和60 Hz，但没有PWM

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 充电器太弱

温度

演讲者

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy M13 audio analysis

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 节省设备

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare