Oppo Find X2 Neo
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4 Blende, 5P
Price comparison
Average of 27 scores (from 37 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo Find X2 Neo
The Find X2 Neo is almost identical to another model from Oppo. Both have a nice look and mid-range hardware, and an ambitious price tag. Find out how the Oppo smartphone performs in our test here.
Source: DxOMark
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Oppo earned itself a very decent Video score of 97. When shooting 4K video at 30 fps (the settings used in testing), exposure is generally accurate, but as with stills, the Find X2 Neo underexposes in low light. Dynamic range is limited, so expect clipping in high-contrast scenes; scenes with wide dynamic range also push the phone to underexpose. Our testers also noticed exposure instabilities across all conditions. Detail is fairly high in bright light and in typical indoor light, but detail drops in low light, sometimes because of underexposure. Noise is well controlled except when light levels get low.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2020
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Oppo Find X2 Neo has a charming in-hand feel, versatile cameras, great speakers, and a screen worth bragging about. With its competition offering more raw power at a lower price however, it falls just short of being ideal for everyone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOne of the world's thinnest 5G phones, you'd be forgiven for mistaking the Find X2 Neo for a fully-fledged flagship; with a stunning display, versatile cameras, great fast-charging and more. Considering what else is out there, it's a little on the pricey side, but if it's a thin, stylish design you're after the Neo should serve you well for a long time.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf what you're after in a smartphone is something that's elegant and reliable, with a more-than-good-enough display and fluid performance, you'll find the Neo will more than meet your needs. Compared to the premium devices out there it'll save you a packet too.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/31/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Oppo Find X2 Neo is a well balanced phone with a pleasingly skinny form factor and an excellent 90Hz display. It’s a thoroughly decent and dependable mid-range effort, though you can get better performance and software for a similar price from the OnePlus 8.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIt's great that the Reno3 Pro 5G has that flagship feel, it offers 5G connectivity, and the overall camera performance is more than just good but it's just not enough to make it stand out. There has to be a dramatic price correction for the phone to stay relevant in this cut-throat upper mid-range market where even last year's flagships are well within reach.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Good Gear Guide
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Find X2 Neo is an incredibly compelling sub-flagship option for those who don’t care that much about wireless charging or having a camera with 10x hybrid zoom. It’s got 5G. It’s got great battery life and it feels more pricey that it actually is.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Techtest.org
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2020
Source: Chinahandys.net
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: PCtipp.ch
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Area DVD
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2020
Source: Nextpit Germany
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Nextpit Germany
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Focus Online
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2020
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/18/2020
Source: Teltarif
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 84% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: MobiFlip
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2020
Source: Xataka
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 88% display: 90% mobility: 83% workmanship: 88%
Source: Computerhoy
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: El Androide Libre
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/03/2020
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2020
Source: Techzilla.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 79% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 86%
Source: Want.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 100%
Source: CNet France
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Journal du Geek
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 88% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Fredzone
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2020
Source: Phonandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 765G:
具有8个CPU Kryo 475内核的快速中端ARM SoC(一个主频为2.4 GHz的高速ARM Cortex-A76主核,一个主频为2.2 GHz的A76中核和六个主频为1.8 GHz的ARM Cortex-A55小核)。作为首批SoC之一,它还集成了5G调制解调器(Snapdragon X52下行和上传速度高达3.7 / 1.6 Mbps,支持mmWave和Sub-6)。该处理器在采用三星高效的7纳米EUV工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.