Notebookcheck

小米9智能手机评测

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), 06/05/2019
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

廉价旗舰机。 小米9让不可能成为了可能,至少从其他制造商的角度来看的确如此。小米9仅售2999元起,但它是目前最好的旗舰智能手机之一。它的4800万像素三摄,UFS 2.1闪存,高端做工和AMOLED显示器只是该设备脱颖而出的几个原因,其全新的骁龙 855 SoC也是如此。我们在详细评测中对Mi 9进行了测试,看看它是如何与其他旗舰智能手机相媲美的。

Xiaomi Mi 9 (Mi 9 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x, 2133 MHz双通道
Display
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, oleophobic coating, anti-fingerprint, NTSC 103.8%, 90.7% screen-to-body ratio, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, , 50.51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器,加速传感器, 距离传感器, 指南针, 陀螺仪, USB Type-C, aptX, aptX-HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi 2x2 MIMO, MU-MIMO, Google Pay
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. UMTS: B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34, 39. LTE: B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40. 4x4 MIMO antenna. SAR values: Body – 1.301 W/kg, Head - 1.389 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.61 x 157.5 x 74.67
Battery
3300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quick Charge 4.0, 20 W wireless charging, 27 W wired fast charging
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , Sony IMX586,f / 1.75,1 / 2“,0.8μm.16Mix广角摄像头:f / 2.2,13 mm,1 / 3.0”,1.0μm。 12 MP长焦相机:f / 2.2,54 mm,1 / 3.6“,1.0μm,2倍光学变焦。照片最高可达4K,视频最高可达8,000 x 6,000。
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f /2.0,0.9μm,HDR,高达1080p @ 960 FPS慢动作,4K @ 60 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 模块化电源,USB Type-C到A型电缆,保护盖,SIM工具,快速入门指南,保修卡,, MIUI 10, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
173 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
517 (min: 477, max: 528) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=463)
230 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +24%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
644 (min: 578, max: 672) MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼77%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼62% -20%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼43% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=463)
218 MBit/s ∼31% -59%
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Corners
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Corners
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Roundabout
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Roundabout

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
568
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 601 cd/m² Average: 586.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 593 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone XR
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Honor View 20
LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen
-18%
-22%
-79%
-58%
-113%
-157%
Brightness middle
593
672
13%
576
-3%
492
-17%
437
-26%
710
20%
430
-27%
Brightness
587
641
9%
582
-1%
475
-19%
442
-25%
721
23%
434
-26%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
90
-4%
94
0%
95
1%
97
3%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.35
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.9
1.3
-44%
1.3
-44%
2.4
-167%
2.21
-146%
3.7
-311%
5.09
-466%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2
2.7
-35%
3.5
-75%
5.2
-160%
4.27
-114%
10.3
-415%
8.05
-303%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
2.2
-47%
1.6
-7%
3.2
-113%
2.1
-40%
1.5
-0%
3.3
-120%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.3 96%
2.18 101%
2.06 107%
2.307 95%
2.1 105%
2.257 97%
CCT
6548 99%
6868 95%
6561 99%
7125 91%
6353 102%
6611 98%
7026 93%
Contrast
1920
1230

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
21070 Points ∼100% +182%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼42% +19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼43% +21%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼63% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼48% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼63% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=11)
7603 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼22% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11276 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼89% -9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼88% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼80% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼79% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=13)
10960 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼42% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4750 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼71% -4%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼70% -6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼50% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼51% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=13)
3486 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼30% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼96% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼96% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼88% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼81% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=17)
9650 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=401)
5392 Points ∼56% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼98% +14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=17)
12152 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=568)
5857 Points ∼46% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3030 Points ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼84% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼67% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4576, n=17)
3845 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=408)
2012 Points ∼46% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5061 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼60% -40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=17)
6772 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=408)
1834 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4405 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼72% -28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=17)
5759 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=409)
1703 Points ∼29% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2880 Points ∼65% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼70% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼49% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=16)
3824 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=437)
1920 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
14085 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼38% -48%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼32% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼38% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=16)
9490 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=437)
2444 Points ∼17% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7555 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼72% -27%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼67% -32%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼84% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼53% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=16)
7096 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=437)
2052 Points ∼27% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3121 Points ∼75% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼100% +11%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼85% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼71% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼51% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4429, n=17)
3918 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=488)
1915 Points ∼46% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3806 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼66% -34%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=17)
6242 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=488)
1519 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3629 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼76% -24%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=17)
5498 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=489)
1461 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2960 Points ∼70% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼98% +15%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼68% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼50% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4540, n=16)
3864 Points ∼92% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=529)
1778 Points ∼42% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7806 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=16)
9255 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=528)
1993 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5724 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼70% -30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=16)
7039 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=531)
1719 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
27413 Points ∼74% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼99% +45%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼94% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼87% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼75% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=16)
31794 Points ∼86% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=689)
14382 Points ∼39% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
162695 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼42% -36%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼41% -37%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼52% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼43% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼47% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=15)
105649 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=687)
22643 Points ∼14% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
77597 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼74% -8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼71% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=15)
68785 Points ∼89% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=687)
18264 Points ∼24% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
232 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼52% -28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼51% -29%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼66% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼41% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼52% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=18)
153 fps ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=707)
38.7 fps ∼17% -77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼94% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼96% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼94% 0%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼94% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼91% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼94% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=18)
63.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=716)
28.4 fps ∼45% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
132 fps ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼55% -27%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼45% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼51% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=18)
92.5 fps ∼70% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=612)
22.4 fps ∼17% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼70% -30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=18)
60.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=621)
19.7 fps ∼33% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
88 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼33% -58%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼57% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼67% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼53% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=18)
62.1 fps ∼71% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=477)
18.3 fps ∼21% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼43% -55%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼75% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=18)
48.3 fps ∼81% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=479)
17.1 fps ∼29% -71%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼41%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +146%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼32% -21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼37% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼37% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=17)
21.7 fps ∼37% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=200)
10.3 fps ∼17% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼65% -19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼70% -12%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=18)
16.5 fps ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=199)
7.13 fps ∼36% -55%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -51%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼53% -16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼58% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼44% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=17)
33.8 fps ∼57% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=204)
15.1 fps ∼26% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
63 fps ∼100% +54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼52% -20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼54% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼59% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼73% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼54% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=18)
40.3 fps ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=204)
16.9 fps ∼27% -59%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
54 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼57% -26%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼59% -24%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼65% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼48% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=18)
39.4 fps ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=402)
12.4 fps ∼23% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
58 fps ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼28% -58%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼48% -26%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼40% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼48% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=18)
32.3 fps ∼56% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=406)
11.2 fps ∼19% -71%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼44%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼34% -22%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼41% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼38% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=66)
85.4 fps ∼100% +128%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼51%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼27% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼47% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼43% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼44% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=59)
62.8 fps ∼100% +95%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼26% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼34% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼40% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼33% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=56)
97.3 fps ∼100% +173%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼80% -20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=16)
354450 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼38% -62%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
257246 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼92% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points ∼92% -2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼84% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
234421 Points ∼86% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (239512 - 268271, n=12)
255436 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼32% -66%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼94% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=63)
2271 Score ∼45% -54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
1722 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼83% +3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼82% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼81% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=17)
1344 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=644)
766 Points ∼44% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
15969 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼39% -32%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼47% -19%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼53% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼49% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=17)
9197 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=644)
2125 Points ∼13% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3263 Points ∼52% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +56%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼89% +39%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼69% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼52% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=17)
5010 Points ∼80% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=644)
1563 Points ∼25% -61%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11946 Points ∼100% +42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼72% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼68% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼70% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼55% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=17)
8548 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=644)
3048 Points ∼26% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5721 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼82% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼83% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=17)
4768 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=644)
1531 Points ∼27% -67%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2754 Points ∼100% +95%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points ∼57% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼70% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=4)
1334 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=106)
746 Points ∼27% -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
267.84 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=15)
110 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼41% -1%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
108.07 Points ∼40% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
75.483 Points ∼28% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=542)
42.7 Points ∼16% -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
42897 Points ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=18)
23212 Points ∼54% -5%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼49% -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼35% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=703)
6943 Points ∼16% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=728)
10429 ms * ∼100% -457%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼27% -50%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼22% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=17)
2133 ms * ∼20% -14%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼20% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼19% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼18% +1%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
610.3 ms * ∼6% +67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
161 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼71% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=18)
106 Points ∼66% -2%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points ∼61% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼52% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=175)
67.8 Points ∼42% -37%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
343 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
314 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (260 - 316, n=2)
288 Points ∼84%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
263 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
245 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=333)
122 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Points ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9Huawei Mate 20 ProHonor View 20OnePlus 6TSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusXiaomi Mi 8Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-3%
-33%
-28%
-35%
-29%
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.1 (17.1 - 71.9, n=28)
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=438)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.4 (18 - 86.6, n=28)
67.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=438)
Random Write 4KB
165.32
157.84
-5%
138.85
-16%
22
-87%
22.7
-86%
21
-87%
60.1 (8.77 - 165, n=38)
-64%
23.4 (0.14 - 259, n=763)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
149.36
157.42
5%
168.91
13%
138.5
-7%
135.16
-10%
136.3
-9%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=38)
-10%
48.7 (1.59 - 226, n=763)
-67%
Sequential Write 256KB
388.27
196.39
-49%
250.06
-36%
204.4
-47%
249.06
-36%
207.8
-46%
199 (133 - 388, n=38)
-49%
99.6 (2.99 - 590, n=763)
-74%
Sequential Read 256KB
666.06
853.28
28%
847.48
27%
735.3
10%
811.17
22%
693.2
4%
711 (484 - 895, n=38)
7%
281 (12.1 - 1781, n=763)
-58%
Max. Load
 31 °C31.8 °C30 °C 
 31.8 °C30.7 °C30.1 °C 
 31.3 °C31.4 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.8 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
28.8 °C30.3 °C30.5 °C
28.5 °C30 °C30.8 °C
29 °C30.2 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 30.9 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.432.92528.325.43118.726.54026.725.95033.229.46322.622.78021.822.210024.43112523.839.216018.550.420017.149.125017.853.831515.556.140014.162.55001467.963013.869.180014.773.5100015.477125015.276.6160014.376.5200014.574.9250013.971.7315014.675.9400014.178.1500014.374.3630014.574.6800014.875.71000014.8751250014.864.4160001558.2SPL26.887.1N0.871.4median 14.8median 71.7Delta1.51042.737.742.136.430.529.133.632.738.134.830.431.825.224.825.524.9262921.538.920.144.618.947.817.85418.35819.162.619.565.217.366.515.767.214.369.615.87114.874.915.470.714.766.814.361.314.768.414.870.714.267.51462.214.554.914.347.568.82881.222.2147.9median 15.7median 62.62.310.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9Xiaomi Mi 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.26 / 1.29 Watt
Load midlight 3.71 / 9.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-35%
-58%
-11%
-30%
-76%
-26%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.61
9%
0.95
-42%
0.97
-45%
0.7
-4%
0.73
-9%
1.5
-124%
0.967 (0.6 - 1.96, n=17)
-44%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=792)
-32%
Idle Average *
1.26
2.67
-112%
2.17
-72%
2.58
-105%
1.1
13%
1.53
-21%
2.2
-75%
1.519 (0.85 - 2.8, n=17)
-21%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=791)
-38%
Idle Maximum *
1.29
2.69
-109%
2.25
-74%
2.63
-104%
2.1
-63%
2.07
-60%
2.6
-102%
1.841 (1 - 2.9, n=17)
-43%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=792)
-57%
Load Average *
3.71
4.34
-17%
4.47
-20%
5.24
-41%
4.2
-13%
6.03
-63%
6.1
-64%
4.6 (3.64 - 5.8, n=17)
-24%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=786)
-10%
Load Maximum *
9.3
5.66
39%
6.15
34%
8.73
6%
8.3
11%
9.18
1%
10.9
-17%
9.1 (7.49 - 11.9, n=17)
2%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=786)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 14min
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
47%
19%
25%
25%
-8%
9%
Reader / Idle
1650
2969
80%
1747
6%
1928
17%
1936
17%
1560
-5%
1634
-1%
H.264
1008
1011
0%
854
-15%
932
-8%
903
-10%
921
-9%
897
-11%
WiFi v1.3
546
910
67%
767
40%
969
77%
865
58%
483
-12%
736
35%
Load
194
270
39%
282
45%
222
14%
261
35%
187
-4%
215
11%

Pros

+ 优质玻璃外壳
+ 快速的WiFi
+ 精确的GPS
+ 双SIM卡
+ Widevine DRM L1认证
+ 优秀的三后置摄像头
+ 快速指纹传感器
+ 快速面部识别
+ 令人印象深刻的AMOLED显示
+ 强大的SoC
+ UFS 2.1闪存
+ 无线充电
+ 快充4.0

Cons

- 机身很容易沾染指纹
- 不防水或防尘
- 由于其三后置摄像头,该设备不能平放
- 没有microSD卡插槽
- TypeC端口仅支持USB 2.0
- 没有耳机插孔
- PWM
- 电池续航一般
小米9智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
小米9智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

小米9是一款出色的智能手机,其物超所值的程度足以让其他旗舰手机感到羞耻。基本型号具有6 GB RAM和64 GB存储空间,标准配备齐全。但是,对于许多人来说,128 GB型号可能是更好的选择,因为Mi 9不支持可扩展存储。

小米为所有Mi 9型号配备了出色的三后置摄像头和明亮的AMOLED屏幕,具有典型的色彩精确度,所有这些都装在一个时尚的高品质玻璃外壳里。全新的高通骁龙855 SoC也使Mi 9成为目前性能最强的智能手机之一。

如果您追求的是旗舰体验,但预算有限,小米9是您应该购买的智能手机。它提供了竞争对手所做的一切,但无需花费太多

虽然我们有一些抱怨,例如缺少耳机插孔和没有microSD卡支持,但Mi 9与很多竞争对手都一样缺乏这些功能。优雅的玻璃外壳也容易出现指纹,三后置摄像头外壳使设备在桌面上无法平放,但这些缺点并没有减损2019年初最物美价廉的旗舰智能手机之一。

Xiaomi Mi 9 - 09/27/2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
90%
Battery
88%
Display
90%
Games Performance
55 / 64 → 86%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
70%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米9智能手机评测
Manuel Masiero, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 5)