判决
RedMagic 11 Pro 是同性能级别智能手机中为数不多的提供不间断显示屏和完全省略摄像头凸起的手机。它的性能一流，游戏功能也确实令人印象深刻。
缺点也不容忽视。该设备的表面会变得非常热，而且内部风扇的声音可能会非常大。此外，它还没有 Wi-Fi 7、现代蓝牙 6.0 和 eSIM 支持。
如果这些限制和较短的软件更新政策不会让你感到困扰，而原始性能又是你的首要考虑因素，那么这款设备就是你的不二之选。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
这款游戏智能手机可直接从RedMagic 购买或通过亚马逊（德国）订购。
RedMagic 11 Pro 继承了 RedMagic 10s Pro脱颖而出，主要归功于其更新的 SoC 和焕然一新的设计。电池容量也大幅增加，并新增了多项人工智能功能。
RedMagic 11 Pro 的基本存储配置起价为 799 欧元，但高容量版本可能会攀升至 999 欧元。
规格RedMagic 11 Pro
外壳和功能 - RedMagic 11 Pro 没有凹槽，也没有摄像头凸起
RedMagic 11 Pro 有 Cryo（亚光黑）、Nightfreeze（透明黑）和 Subzero（透明银）三种颜色。并非每种存储配置都提供每种颜色。基本机型配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 内部存储空间，还有 16/512 GB 和 24/1,024 GB 版本可供选择。
该机的制造质量很高，公差很小，采用坚固的铝制框架。该设备采用未指定版本的大猩猩玻璃保护，防水等级为 IPX8。
RedMagic 11 Pro 的一个突出特点是没有摄像头凸起；摄像头模块位于后玻璃下方。正面同样简洁，既没有凹槽，也没有冲孔。自拍摄像头隐身于显示屏下方。
除了快速 USB 3.2 端口外，手机还包括多个可配置的 LED 元件。在有线音频方面，提供了一个低噪音 3.5 毫米插孔（信噪比：96.6 dBFS）和一个 USB-C 端口。
通信和操作 - RedMagic 11 Pro 依赖于 Wi-Fi 6E
RedMagic 11 Pro 提供可靠的移动网络支持，但缺少几个频段，这限制了真正无限制的国际使用。这款手机还跳过了现代的 Wi-Fi 7，坚持使用 Wi-Fi 6E。
与前代产品一样，该手机的两个肩部按键表现出色，并提供了丰富的自定义选项。在生物识别安全方面，显示屏下的超声波指纹传感器响应速度快、准确度高。线性振动电机可提供精确、有力的触觉反馈。
| Networking | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 更新前途未卜
这款智能手机运行谷歌Android 16 和 RedMagic UI，看起来很现代，包括自己的启动器和一些人工智能功能。遗憾的是，RedMagic 没有提供有关长期软件支持的具体信息。
在可持续性方面也有改进的余地。没有备件，没有维修指南，包装也严重依赖塑料。
相机 - 变焦不足，缺乏亮点
RedMagic 11 Pro 的前置摄像头位于显示屏下方，没有开孔。虽然这带来了不间断的观看体验，但图像质量却很一般。照片和视频看起来对比度较低，有些失色。
主摄像头的成像效果明显更好，甚至能在弱光环境下拍摄出清晰的照片。不过，超广角摄像头尽管分辨率很高，但提供的细节有限，变焦也仅限于数字变焦。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 明亮易见
RedMagic 11 Pro 的 6.85 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏可提供无间断的观看体验和出色的亮度。即使在全白屏幕上，它也几乎达到了制造商宣称的 1,800 cd/m²，而在较小的白色窗口（APL18）上，它可以轻松超过这一数值。我们测得的亮度高达 2,375 cd/m²。HDR 亮度略低，但并不支持所有 HDR 标准。
在示波器下可以看到典型的 OLED 闪烁，显示出相对较低的 120 Hz 基本频率。不过，高频 PWM 调光和较浅的振幅曲线有助于减轻视觉疲劳。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1711 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
CCT: 6478 K
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro AMOLED, 2688x1216, 6.8" | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9" | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 0% | -34% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1711 | 1099 -36% | 1357 -21% | 1846 8% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1715 | 1067 -38% | 1350 -21% | 1850 8% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 95 6% | 94 4% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.05 38% | 3.1 -82% | 1.2 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.38 5% | 4.7 -88% | 2.9 -16% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 2.2 4% | 2.3 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.232 99% | 2 110% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6478 100% | 6779 96% | 6391 102% | 6707 97% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 17 % Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6065 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.644 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6065 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7155 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--烫手山芋
RedMagic 11 Pro 采用骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 处理器，在主动散热系统的帮助下，无可争议地实现了高性能。内部风扇的转速可达 24,000 RPM，当它运转时，你肯定能听到它的声音。
尽管有散热功能，但表面温度仍会急剧上升，在长时间游戏时会让人感到不舒服。
电池续航时间总体来说非常不错，尽管大幅增大的电池容量让我们期待更长的续航时间。在测试中，智能手机只用了 67 分钟就充满了电。
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -26% | -19% | -19% | -46% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 4035.9 | 3971.4 -2% | 3823.28 -5% | 4002.68 -1% | 3789 ? -6% | 2232 ? -45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3728.82 | 3899.9 5% | 3361.24 -10% | 3464.43 -7% | 3201 ? -14% | 1842 ? -51% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 575.62 | 548.4 -5% | 287.85 -50% | 311.24 -46% | 377 ? -35% | 295 ? -49% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 537.11 | 561.3 5% | 331.61 -38% | 411.78 -23% | 422 ? -21% | 335 ? -38% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.1 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
RedMagic 11 Pro 是一款具有实用附加功能的高性能游戏智能手机。 前代产品的潜在高热量问题。
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
- 11/24/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.7%  | Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Nubia RedMagic 1... 2. $9.90 Anbzsign 2 Pack for ZTE Nubi... 3. $9.99 Case for Nubia RedMagic 11 P... List Price: 799€ | 230 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.84" 2688x1216 431 PPI AMOLED |
2. 89%  | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.19 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen... 2. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 3. $14.53 INIU for iPhone 17 Charger, ... List Price: 940€ | 219 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED |
3. 89.4%  | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25... 2. $908.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... 3. $1,120.00 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ... List Price: 1449€ | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
4. 85.3%  | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $579.99 XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $11.99 Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P... List Price: 800€ | 212 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.67" 3200x1440 526 PPI Flow AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
