Realme GT 8 Pro 的评价
GT 8 Pro 承诺提供最好的硬件，但在价格方面却没有进入绝对的高端市场。然而，我们的测试报告却揭示了一些意想不到的弱点，除了一些设备缺陷（如快速 USB 端口）外，这些弱点在数据表中并不明显。其中包括显示屏在短时间后会变暗，或者原本功能强大的骁龙 8 精英 5 代会出现非常高的节流现象，尽管后者不太可能对日常使用造成严重影响。
可控的照片质量，尤其是变焦后的照片质量，更贴近日常生活，这也是一个惊喜，因为 Realme 从今年开始就与理光合作开发相机。
如果你正在寻找一款电池续航时间长的高性能智能手机，GT 8 Pro 仍能让你满意。Realme 手机具有高品质的感觉，提供了有趣的设计理念和一些设备亮点，如快速超声波指纹传感器或 120 瓦快速充电。
Pros
Cons
Realme GT 8 Pro 的规格
外壳和功能 - 防水防尘Android 手机
GT 8 Pro 是 Realme 手机中最特别的一款 GT 系列制造商在设计方面的突破。相机模块有一个盖子，用户可以更换。用户可以选择 圆形或矩形摄像头盖板以及无盖的 "机器人 "设计。
GT 8 Pro 的重量为 214 克（约 7.6 盎司），当然算不上轻巧。不过，考虑到 Realme 为其旗舰手机配备了 7,000 毫安时电池，这款 8.3 毫米（约 0.3 英寸）薄的智能手机还是非常方便的。
这款手机通过了 IP68/IP69 防水认证，正面采用康宁大猩猩 7i 玻璃，背面则是塑料质地，Realme 称这种质地让人联想到纸张。如果你愿意，还可以购买阿斯顿-马丁的 F1 版，其背面由芳纶纤维制成。
Realme 手机的 USB 接口令人失望。2026 年，慢速 2.0 标准将很难在高端智能手机中发挥作用，因为现在对接口在速度和功能（图像输出、快速数据传输......）方面的要求已大大提高。
通信和操作 -Android 带面部解锁功能的智能手机
虽然 Realme 旗舰版配备了 Wi-Fi 7，但在我们的测量中，它的速度并不快。原因是不支持 6 GHz 频段。不过，我们只在华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 上使用了 Wi-Fi 6E 路由器。不过，在日常使用中，超过 800 MBit/s 的速度对大多数用户来说应该绰绰有余。
除了两张 nano-SIM 卡外，GT 8 Pro 还可以使用 eSIM 卡。听筒的语音质量不错。
在生物识别安全方面，显示屏集成了快速超声波指纹传感器，识别率很高。还可通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别、
| Networking | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 -Android 16 和 5 年更新
Realme 保证为欧洲地区提供五次主要的Android 升级，并在五年内提供新的安全更新。在测试期间，Realme GT 8 Pro 配备了Android 16 和 Realme UI 7.0。补丁的日期仍然是 2025 年 12 月，这意味着它们可能每季度才会推出一次（最多）。
那些对 GT 8 Pro 感兴趣的人对其可持续性还一无所知。不过，外包装似乎是无塑料的。
照相机 -Android-Handy 200 MPix
直到现在 GT 系列在此之前，Realme 的 GT 系列往往代表着强大的性价比或高端游戏，但现在随着理光的合作，这种情况将得到改变。现在，后置三摄像头的拍照质量也将成为一大亮点。
Realme 配备了一枚 50-MPix 主摄像头，带有 OIS，但传感器相对较小，只有 1/1.56 英寸。在日光下效果很吸引人，色彩看起来也很自然。不过，GT 8 Pro 的锐度稍有欠缺，尤其是图像边缘。在弱光环境下，噪点表现和照度都不理想。
潜望镜长焦摄像头采用 1/1.56 英寸传感器，像素为 200 万像素，还提供无损三倍变焦。但其清晰度却出奇地差，在 5 倍变焦时几乎无法识别任何细节。我们更喜欢 5000 万像素的超广角镜头，尽管这对于高端智能手机来说并无特别之处。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltrawideZoom 5x
显示屏 - 配备超大 OLED 屏幕的顶级智能手机
GT 8 Pro 采用 1440p AMOLED 面板，帧频为 144 Hz，峰值亮度高达 7000 尼特。我们也可以确认后者（峰值：6963 cd/m²），至少在开发者设置的特殊模式下是如此。在更日常的测试中，如 APL18 或 HDR 内容（2,078 cd/m²），我们无法（甚至无法接近）达到这些值。此外，在日常使用中，最大亮度在很短时间后就会降低到 1,000 cd/m² 以下。
不需要高频 PWM 调光，频率非常高，为 2,160 Hz。
在专业模式下，我们可以获得最佳的色彩显示效果。灰阶也非常准确。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1896 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6594 K
| Realme GT 8 Pro AMOLED, 3136x1440, 6.8" | Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Vivo iQOO 15 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9" | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | -21% | 7% | -39% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1896 | 1537 -19% | 1137 -40% | 1717 -9% | 1371 -28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1891 | 1523 -19% | 1113 -41% | 1721 -9% | 1370 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 96 0% | 96 0% | 98 2% | 96 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.4 -27% | 1.52 -38% | 1 9% | 2.7 -145% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 2.6 16% | 3.05 2% | 2.2 29% | 4.2 -35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.1 -0% | 2.3 -10% | 1.7 19% | 2 5% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.265 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 6594 99% | 6754 96% | 6560 99% | 6574 99% | 6450 101% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz Amplitude: 13.95 % Secondary Frequency: 2173 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8002 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3925 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.355 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4665 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 -Android-配备高端芯片组的手机
多亏了 骁龙 8 第五代精英版的 Adreno 840Realme 手机提供了真正的旗舰级性能，而自制的 R1 芯片也旨在减少显示屏的输入延迟。
无论是 CPU 还是 GPU 测试，基准测试的数值都非常不错。不过，芯片组在负载情况下的节流非常明显，在 3DMark 压力测试中有时几乎达到 70%。
扬声器的音效非常震撼，我们的粉红噪声测量显示中音明显增加。
GT 8 Pro 在欧洲还配备了 7,000 毫安时电池，可通过 USB-C 充电，最大功率为 120 瓦，无线充电功率为 50 瓦。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Realme 手机可以持续使用一整天。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=8) | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=65, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Realme GT 8 Pro | Vivo X300 | Vivo iQOO 15 | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -22% | -16% | -25% | -18% | -48% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 4087.51 | 2056.87 -50% | 2556.87 -37% | 3959.14 -3% | 4057.35 -1% | 3456 ? -15% | 2140 ? -48% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3324.21 | 1997.76 -40% | 2589.26 -22% | 3833.02 15% | 3311.02 0% | 2953 ? -11% | 1841 ? -45% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 488.38 | 332.61 -32% | 453.54 -7% | 309.91 -37% | 294.51 -40% | 398 ? -19% | 294 ? -40% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 871.05 | 654.09 -25% | 689.01 -21% | 521.31 -40% | 351.16 -60% | 635 ? -27% | 346 ? -60% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
Realme GT 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Realme 的 GT 8 Pro 做得很好，但在许多方面（亮度调光、USB 2.0、照片质量......）不得不忍受批评。
Realme GT 8 Pro
- 02/26/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.1%  | Realme GT 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1000€ | 214 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.79" 3136x1440 508 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.9%  | Realme GT7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: List Price: 999€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED |
3. 88.6%  | Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 580€ | 215 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.85" 3168x1440 508 PPI AMOLED |
4. 88.4%  | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 1149 Euro | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
5. 88.2%  | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 900€ | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
