Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic4 Pro 5G评测--功能多样的摄像智能手机,功能丰富

强势复出。 Honor Magic4 Pro是一款具有多种功能的高端智能手机,是前华为子公司被收购后的第一款机型。由于没有贸易限制,它提供了一个伟大的功能集,重点是相机设置。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

尽管Honor Magic系列在去年得到了恢复,但我们测试设备的前辈魔法3 Pro由于持续的贸易限制而没有进入欧洲。现在,这个前华为子公司已被出售给一个 中国投资集团Honor ,不再属于美国的制裁范围,因此能够采购现代芯片组、5G无线电和谷歌移动服务(GMS)。

Honor Magic4 Pro与前代产品差别不大,采用相同的设计语言。然而,显示屏的尺寸略有增加,SoC和相机传感器都得到了升级。方便的是,现在有了IP认证和大功率有线和无线充电。此外,Magic4 Pro是少数利用3D面部识别的Android 智能手机之一。

Honor Magic4 Pro (Magic Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.81 inch 19.54:9, 2848 x 1312 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, OLED, LTPO: 1 to 120 Hz, 1920 Hz DC-Dimming, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235.05 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 26, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.15 x 163.6 x 74.7
Battery
4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm) + 50 MP (ultrawide, 122°, f/2.2, 1/2.5") + 64 MP (3.5x optical zoom, f/3.5, 90 mm, 1/2.0", 0.7 µm); Ultra HD video @ 60 FPS; Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, 1.22 µm) + TOF 3D
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 100W charger, bumper, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, Magic UI 6, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, body SAR: 1.25 W/kg, head SAR: 0.74 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g, Power Supply: 175 g
Price
1100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.4 %
07/2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312
87.4 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.9 %
06/2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
200.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89.3 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
90.4 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
238 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
89 %
04/2022
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440

Honor Magic4 Pro有黑色和青色两种颜色,另外还有白色、金色和橙色版本,可能会根据地区的不同而不同。我们的测试设备是一个青色型号,根据数据表,其厚度为9.15毫米(约0.36英寸)。我们测量了9.45毫米(约0.37英寸)。由于相机设置占用了很多空间,智能手机在平坦的表面上放置时不会左右摇晃。1.7毫米(约0.07英寸),摄像头的凸起不是太明显。

我们对其做工非常满意。纤细的金属框架使其具有坚固和优质的外观。玻璃显示屏与框架平齐,略微倾斜的玻璃边缘使Honor ,看起来几乎没有框架,93%的屏占比进一步加强了这种印象。虽然间隙紧密而均匀,但Magic4 Pro在从四角扭转时有明显的吱吱声。

框架内有一个凹陷的SIM卡托盘盖,颜色相同,正面是金属。托盘本身由黑色塑料组成,可接受两张纳米SIM卡。电池是固定的,用户不能更换。Honor Magic4 Pro通过了IP68认证,既防水又防尘。

尺寸比较

163.9 mm 75.9 mm 8.9 mm 210 g163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 200.5 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g

连接性 -Honor 带有USB 3.2和红外辐射器的智能手机

尽管Honor Magic4 Pro的USB 3.2端口(第1代)能够以高达5Gb/s的速度传输数据,但包装中只包括一条USB 2.0电缆。该接口既支持OTG,也支持视频输出到HDMI和DisplayPort设备。在这里,用户能够选择简单的屏幕镜像或使用集成的桌面模式。

扩展存储空间是不可能的。也没有FM接收器或通知LED。不过,如果需要的话,后者可以被永远在线的显示屏的功能所取代。Honor 手机的连接性非常好,有现代蓝牙5.2、NFC和一个可用于控制多媒体设备、相机或空调的红外辐射器。

顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外线
顶部:扬声器、麦克风、红外线
左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
对。体积、功率
对。体积、功率
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡

软件 - 谷歌Android 12,包括桌面模式

Android 12是选择的操作系统,上面有制造商自己的Magic UI 6.0层。熟悉过去 智能手机的用户将感到宾至如归。由于谷歌的应用和服务不再缺失,Play商店和谷歌支付都再次可用。Honor

Magic4 Pro上只有几个预装的第三方应用程序,包括Netflix和TikTok,它们可以很容易地被卸载。在写这篇文章时,安全补丁可以追溯到2022年5月1日,因此它们是相当新的。Honor ,承诺进行两次主要的Android 版本更新,因此可以达到Android 14,安全补丁可以使用4年。

如果智能手机通过可选的电缆连接到显示器或电视上,可以使用集成的桌面模式。虽然在我们的测试中工作良好,但我们无法在这种模式下访问Play Store或Chrome。其他浏览器的工作没有任何问题。

通信和GNSS - Magic4 Pro,带5G和Wi-Fi 6

在通信方面,Honor Magic4 Pro有一个小小的缺点,因为不支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准,因此不能使用6-GHz。相比之下,Honor 确实支持VHT160,使其与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000之间的传输速度不仅一致,而且即使在5-GHz网络中也非常快。

蜂窝网络的所有主要标准,包括5G sub6都可以使用。由于支持的频率数量很高,用户应该能够从世界上大多数国家访问网络。

Networking
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1465 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1214 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼71%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
944 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
893 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AX12
875 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
718 (min: 707) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1736 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1710 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
615 (min: 44.3) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
645 (min: 61.4) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1339 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1283 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AX12
484 (min: 5.59) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AX12
467 (min: 15.5) MBit/s ∼65%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1344 (720-1445)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1499 (1195-1604)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)
GPS测试。室外
户外活动
GPS测试:室内
在室内
GPSTest。全球导航卫星系统
全球导航卫星系统

出于地理定位的目的,Magic4 Pro可以接入广泛的卫星网络,甚至可以实现三重连接。在户外,卫星上行链路迅速建立,即使在室内,智能手机也能在短短几秒钟内定位我们。

我们将Magic4 Pro与 Garmin Venu 2在我们的小型测试跑道上进行比较。记录的距离只有20米(约65.6英尺),总距离不到10公里(约6.21英里)。仔细看一下详细的路线,证明了Honor 智能手机的精确地理定位能力。

GNSS测试轨道。湖泊
GNSS测试轨道。湖泊
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。转弯
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。转弯
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。摘要
全球导航卫星系统测试轨道。摘要

电话和通话质量

Magic4 Pro支持常见的电话功能,如VoLTE、VoWi-Fi,甚至支持eSIM,而不是次要的物理nano SIM卡。然而,Honor 操作系统不包括SIP账户管理。

当举起耳朵时,通话质量听起来非常自然,不值得批评;即使是轻微的环境或静态背景噪音也被可靠地过滤掉。不幸的是,当使用免提电话时,这种情况就改变了。尽管音量保持一致,而且麦克风捕捉声音的范围也很好,但用户听起来有些空洞和沉闷。

摄像机--多功能的三摄像头,有轻微的视频卡顿问题

魔法4专业版自拍
魔法4专业版自拍

Honor Magic4Pro的正面有一个1200万像素的前置摄像头和一个3D ToF,位于显示屏的一个切口内。在良好的照明条件下,照片看起来相当不错,而自动HDR模式可以平衡逆光拍摄。此外,这款智能手机还配备了虚化模式和高度可定制的美容模式。视频记录可以以高达超高清和30FPS的速度创建。

背面的三摄像头的主要传感器是一个50MP的传感器。虽然Honor 没有详细说明其来源,但数据表指出是索尼IMX766传感器。白天的照片闪耀着良好的对比度和许多细节。同样,Magic4 Pro的动态范围也使其拍摄的照片很吸引人。虽然颜色被提亮了很多,但它们看起来并没有过度饱和。我们对这款Honor 智能手机的整体图像构图非常满意。也就是说,低光照情况下会导致明显的浑浊区域。在这里,Honor ,可能最好减少增亮,以利于捕捉更多细节。

虽然超宽传感器也有5000万像素的分辨率,但它比主传感器小。在日光下,它能捕捉到具有足够景深和没有色差的吸引人的照片。潜望镜光学系统提供3.5倍光学变焦,以及高达100倍的数字变焦。图片在大约10倍变焦之前仍然可以接受,更高的变焦水平在清晰度和细节方面放弃了太多。

视频录制也是Honor Magic4 Pro的主要焦点之一。普通视频模式支持高达30或60 FPS的超高清分辨率,长宽比为16:9或21:9。切换到电影模式,用户可以在30和24 FPS(UHD)、可选的HDR10+模式和LOG模式(60 FPS)之间选择。LOG模式提供了一个特别高的比特率(Rec.709格式,10比特,IMAX增强型),并承诺了更多的后期处理灵活性。尽管我们对视频的视觉效果很满意,但平移仍会导致轻微的卡顿--我们希望Honor ,在未来的更新中解决这个问题。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,测试图表图片中心的细节水平并不理想。至少,在接近边缘的地方,性能并没有明显下降。

ColorChecker显示,深绿色和深色皮肤的色调被过度提亮。同时,青色略微过饱和。

ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic4 Pro: 8.7 ∆E min: 1.78 - max: 20.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
26 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic4 Pro: 17.57 ∆E min: 2.23 - max: 26.68 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括100瓦的充电器

Honor Magic4 Pro的包装包括一个强大的100瓦充电器,一条合适的USB线(Type-A到Type-C),一个SIM卡工具,以及一个透明的硅胶套。一个无线100瓦充电站约100美元和一个黑色PU壳约20美元的黑色PU保护套也可提供。

Honor 根据购买地点的不同,提供长达2年的有限保修。

输入设备和处理 - 带有安全生物识别技术的Magic4 Pro

Honor Magic4 Pro有一个电容式触摸屏,能够同时检测多达十个输入。它配备了一个工厂安装的屏幕保护膜,具有良好的滑行性能。虽然边缘的过渡有些粗糙,但这可以通过使用附带的保险杠轻松补救。

以前型号的指关节手势再次可用,还有一些额外的功能,如多窗口和智能感应,可以从设置中启用。单手模式也可以启用,尽管它可能需要一些与手势控制相结合的练习。

生物识别安全功能是高科技。这是少数具有3D面部识别(ToF)的Android 智能手机之一。与通过前置摄像头进行的二维认证相比,这种认证不仅快速,而且更安全。同样,显示屏下的指纹传感器是一个超声波模型,它通过保存的指纹快速而可靠地解锁手机。总共可以保存五个指纹。

显示屏 -Honor 智能手机,采用明亮的LTPO OLED和120赫兹。

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Honor Magic4 Pro配备了6.81英寸LTPO OLED面板,提供高像素密度和独特的分辨率,介于全高清和QHD+之间。该系统能够在1至120赫兹之间自动调整刷新率,或者用户可以选择一个固定的60、90或120赫兹的刷新率。支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,用于显示HDR内容。

启用环境光传感器后,纯白图像的亮度达到956尼特。OLED面板在APL测量中产生类似的结果。当手动控制亮度时,可以达到573尼特。不幸的是,最低亮度有些高。

虽然Magic4 Pro像所有其他OLED一样存在屏幕闪烁的问题,但Honor 承诺提供频率为1920赫兹的直流调光模式,以明显减少眼疲劳。在我们的测量中,这表现为一个稳定的周期,其频率与刷新率一致。

941
cd/m²
955
cd/m²
989
cd/m²
939
cd/m²
956
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
925
cd/m²
955
cd/m²
983
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 989 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 959 cd/m² Minimum: 4.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 956 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.81
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Google Pixel 6 Pro
LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Screen
23%
26%
34%
39%
24%
24%
Brightness middle
956
959
0%
793
-17%
1077
13%
1049
10%
794
-17%
746
-22%
Brightness
959
977
2%
776
-19%
1093
14%
1060
11%
801
-16%
744
-22%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
95
1%
97
3%
98
4%
97
3%
97
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
1.1
54%
0.79
67%
1.2
50%
0.78
67%
0.9
62%
0.9
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.2
3.1
40%
1.93
63%
2
62%
1.72
67%
2.2
58%
1.6
69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
1.9
42%
1.3
61%
1.3
61%
0.8
76%
1.5
55%
1.6
52%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.223 99%
2.37 93%
2.181 101%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6804 96%
6498 100%
6624 98%
6526 100%
6559 99%
6654 98%
6499 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.9 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
闵行区。
25%的亮度
25 %
50%的亮度
50 %
75%的亮度
75 %
100 %的亮度
100 %

在一个固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行测量

虽然Honor Magic4 Pro的面板可以产生良好的图像,但这需要我们调整设置,将其限制在较小的sRGB色彩空间。奇怪的是,我们不得不选择色温设置。默认设置下的色彩平衡比较暖和,并受到绿色色调的影响,这使屏幕内容看起来有些病态。

虽然Honor 智能手机做得很好,但它的色彩准确度还不如同价位的竞争对手。

灰度(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(配置文件:正常,色温:冷,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.629 ms rise
↘ 0.559 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.484 ms rise
↘ 0.523 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Honor Magic4 Pro在户外表现良好,屏幕内容始终保持清晰可辨。环境光传感器反应灵敏,能迅速调整面板的亮度以适应照明条件。

多云的天空
阴凉处

我们对这款Honor 智能手机的可视角度非常满意。虽然在极端角度下可以观察到微弱的绿色色调,并且感知亮度下降,但这并不明显影响日常使用。

Honor Magic4 Pro 5G的可视角度
Honor Magic4 Pro 5G的可视角度

性能 - 配备骁龙8代的Magic4 Pro

Honor Magic4 Pro依赖于一个强大的 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 1芯片,这是继全新的骁龙8+第1代 - 是目前最快的Android SoC。此外,Honor ,该手机获得了8GB的LPDDR5内存,在某些零售商处有12GB的版本。

Magic智能手机带有一个所谓的性能模式,对CPU和系统性能几乎没有影响。Geekbench的结果保持在同一水平,而人工智能和系统性能则上升了几个百分点。对于日常任务来说,伴随而来的耗电量增加并不是一个值得的交易。然而,在禁用性能模式的情况下,基准测试结果与我们的预期有些差距。尽管Geekbench的单核性能保持不变,但全核性能下降了约10%。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points ∼100% +42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points ∼72% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=20)
1234 Points ∼71% +1%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points ∼70% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼68% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼66% -6%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
1057 Points ∼61% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
687 Points ∼39% -44%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼76% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼72% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=20)
3554 Points ∼72% +5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points ∼72% +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points ∼71% +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points ∼69%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
2941 Points ∼60% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼45% -34%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points ∼95% +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=17)
930046 Points ∼92% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points ∼85% -9%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800222 Points ∼79% -15%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
720905 Points ∼71% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points ∼70% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=126, last 2 years)
556641 Points ∼55% -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=20)
13251 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points ∼85% -15%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
11605 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼71% -29%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1169 Points ∼100% +8%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (749 - 1169, n=13)
993 Points ∼85% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points ∼82% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points ∼81% -13%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
906 Points ∼78% -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
811 Points ∼69% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=67, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼63% -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
8124 Points ∼100% +7%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=14)
6923 Points ∼85% -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points ∼84% -10%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points ∼78% -16%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
6053 Points ∼75% -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points ∼74% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=176, last 2 years)
4356 Points ∼54% -42%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
19657 Points ∼100% +79%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points ∼53% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points ∼53% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=14)
10239 Points ∼52% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points ∼51% -9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points ∼51% -10%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
9009 Points ∼46% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=176, last 2 years)
7717 Points ∼39% -30%
Memory
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=14)
6794 Points ∼87% -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points ∼84% -16%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
6336 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=176, last 2 years)
4981 Points ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3612 Points ∼46% -54%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
25642 Points ∼100% +18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points ∼86% +1%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=14)
20257 Points ∼79% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points ∼67% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points ∼59% -30%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
13319 Points ∼52% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=176, last 2 years)
7789 Points ∼30% -64%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2392 Points ∼100% +36%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
1765 Points ∼74% 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points ∼70% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=14)
1650 Points ∼69% -6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points ∼64% -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points ∼60% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=176, last 2 years)
1391 Points ∼58% -21%
AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
107460 Points ∼100% +1528%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points ∼68% +999%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=146, last 2 years)
55254 Points ∼51% +737%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5783 - 96317, n=13)
18331 Points ∼17% +178%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points ∼6% -6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6121 Points ∼6% -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points ∼6% -9%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
5782 Points ∼5% -12%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
80599 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (61568 - 81722, n=7)
72053 Points ∼89% -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63613 Points ∼79% -21%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288
27946 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 82801, n=74, last 2 years)
18314 Points ∼23% -77%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points ∼13% -87%

Magic4 Pro的 Adreno 730提供了大量的图形性能,基准测试结果大多符合我们对这个图形芯片的期望。然而,正如GFXBench的屏幕外结果所显示的那样,经常有未开发的潜力,表明该SoC的冷却解决方案不具备支持持续高性能水平的条件。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2817 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2568 Points ∼91% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points ∼90% -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points ∼89% -3%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1998 Points ∼71% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points ∼68% -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3080 Points ∼100% +17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2637 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points ∼85% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points ∼84% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points ∼66% -23%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1973 Points ∼64% -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11688 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points ∼89% +1%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points ∼88%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10282 Points ∼88% 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points ∼87% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points ∼62% -29%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7057 Points ∼60% -32%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10034 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9927 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
9680 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points ∼72%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6516 Points ∼65%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4150 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points ∼96% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points ∼95% +4%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3919 Points ∼94% +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼94% +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3801 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
1902 Points ∼46% -50%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19283 Points ∼100% +4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18581 Points ∼96%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points ∼94% -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
16202 Points ∼84% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13950 Points ∼72% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points ∼67% -30%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10733 Points ∼56% -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10323 Points ∼100% +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points ∼97% 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9968 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9149 Points ∼89% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points ∼83% -14%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7742 Points ∼75% -22%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
5782 Points ∼56% -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points ∼100% +5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11556 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11411 Points ∼94% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10958 Points ∼90% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10415 Points ∼86% -10%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9654 Points ∼80% -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25324 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25242 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20842 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18689 Points ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15556 Points ∼61% -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4147 Points ∼97% +4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4120 Points ∼96% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4085 Points ∼95% +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3981 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3922 Points ∼91% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼100% +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps ∼98% -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼83% -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
409.6 fps ∼93% -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
368 fps ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼69% -31%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
125 fps ∼28% -72%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps ∼100% +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps ∼92% -6%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼56% -43%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼51% -48%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼51% -48%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼51% -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps ∼100% +38%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
227.9 fps ∼91% +25%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
204 fps ∼81% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps ∼75% +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps ∼73%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps ∼72% -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼35% -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼59% -41%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼59% -41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼55% -45%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼42% -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps ∼100% +12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps ∼89%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
144 fps ∼85% -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps ∼78% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼75% -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps ∼66% -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼38% -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
53.2 fps ∼89% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼65% -33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼65% -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼50% -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼70% -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps ∼65% -35%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54.8 fps ∼96% +22%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps ∼79%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼63% -20%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼56% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼54% -31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼47% -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼93% -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
37.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼65% -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.1 fps ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼66% -34%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼63% -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
108 fps ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼89% -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼81% -19%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼60% -40%

虽然与我们比较中的其他设备相比,网络浏览性能是最低的,但主观体验仍然很好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.8 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 130.2, n=15)
106.1 Points ∼58% +37%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points ∼57% +33%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points ∼56% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points ∼53% +25%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
91.7 Points ∼50% +19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points ∼46% +9%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years)
65 Points ∼36% -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min ∼100% +269%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min ∼53% +97%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
111 runs/min ∼46% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min ∼45% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=15)
104.9 runs/min ∼43% +60%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min ∼43% +59%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min ∼30% +12%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min ∼27%
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
63 runs/min ∼26% -4%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points ∼100% +146%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
193 Points ∼78% +91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=14)
140.6 Points ∼57% +39%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points ∼54% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points ∼50% +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points ∼48% +18%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
105 Points ∼42% +4%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
101 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 265, n=184, last 2 years)
95.1 Points ∼38% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points ∼100% +130%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points ∼77% +78%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
44034 Points ∼69% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=16)
42169 Points ∼66% +52%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points ∼60% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points ∼53% +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points ∼47% +7%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=191, last 2 years)
24476 Points ∼38% -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 14832, n=189, last 2 years)
2906 ms * ∼100% -102%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * ∼50%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * ∼46% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * ∼43% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * ∼39% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=15)
1020 ms * ∼35% +29%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)
915 ms * ∼31% +36%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * ∼28% +43%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * ∼14% +71%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (68 - 119, n=3)
86 Points ∼100% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 142, n=18, last 2 years)
76.1 Points ∼88% +7%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points ∼83%

* ... smaller is better

8GB的内存和256GB的内部UFS 3.1存储,Magic4 Pro的内存配置还算不错。然而,从价格上看,至少内存容量可以更高。在中国,还有两种内存配置。12/256 GB和12/512 GB。

我们对所安装内存的速度没有任何抱怨,它可以实现快速的数据传输。

Honor Magic4 ProXiaomi 12 ProOnePlus 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GGoogle Pixel 6 ProOppo Find X5 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
10%
-11%
-10%
-51%
-34%
-15%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
1868.5
1620
-13%
1602.12
-14%
1653
-12%
1560
-17%
1410
-25%
1774 ?(1330 - 2037, n=53)
-5%
944 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
1367.48
1465
7%
1253.34
-8%
1074
-21%
242.5
-82%
894
-35%
975 ?(452 - 1559, n=53)
-29%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=260, last 2 years)
-63%
Random Read 4KB
268.76
324.9
21%
284.34
6%
322.3
20%
129.4
-52%
183.7
-32%
266 ?(181 - 345, n=53)
-1%
171.2 ?(13.5 - 345, n=260, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
366.13
448.9
23%
264.45
-28%
273.1
-25%
178.5
-51%
210.4
-43%
277 ?(197.5 - 458, n=54)
-24%
167.6 ?(30.3 - 475, n=261, last 2 years)
-54%

游戏 -Honor 具有大量游戏能力的智能手机

虽然我们想在这里展示我们的GameBench游戏基准,但帧率并没有被记录下来,即使Gamebench似乎开始记录FPS。我们无法确定原因,并就这一问题与GameBench联系,希望将来能附加上结果。

Adreno 730提供了快速的游戏性能,并以最大的细节顺利地运行所有的游戏。PUBG移动版允许选择超高清设置,不会出现卡顿现象。要求不高的游戏,如Armajet,允许不设上限的帧率。因此,120 FPS在理论上是可能的,但根据我们的经验,不太可能。然而,类似的帧率在其他HFR游戏中肯定是可以实现的。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
No graph data

排放 - 体面的立体声扬声器

温度

Honor Magic4 Pro 5G的表面温度在所有情况下都保持在较低的水平,便于操作。

SoC温度的情况则相反。在这里,Honor 智能手机的节流相当早,但仍然设法在相同的范围内,作为其骁龙8代1竞争对手的范围内,而小米12 Pro则在长期性能方面 小米12 Pro是唯一的例外,因为它的节流现象比较严重。

Max. Load
 34.4 °C34.7 °C34.4 °C 
 33.8 °C34.4 °C34.4 °C 
 32.5 °C34.3 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 34 °C
31.6 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C
31.7 °C32.9 °C33 °C
31.7 °C33.2 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 32.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 (41.6min) % ∼87% +6%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 (38.3min) % ∼82%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (37.2min) % ∼78% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 (25.9min) % ∼73% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % ∼59% -28%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.4 (17.4min) % ∼54% -34%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 (11.3min) % ∼95% +17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (9.64min) % ∼81% 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 (9.89min) % ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 (7.76min) % ∼80% -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 (5.37min) % ∼57% -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% ∼0% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.1 (9.89-15.8)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.7 (38.3-58.6)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

发言人

Honor Magic4 Pro的两个扬声器提供了相当体面的声音,虽然缺乏低音,但听起来相当悦耳,特别是在中等音量水平。在较高的音量下,高音变得有些压抑,整体声音有些空洞。

由于没有耳机插孔,有线耳机和耳麦只能通过USB连接。当然,也可以用一个适配器来代替。Magic4 Pro为无线音频做了充分准备,支持所有主要的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203937.82524.4263120.424.74018.322.25030.731.46325.525.88023.925.610018.124.21252032.216025.246.820016.848.625014.452.53151755.440011.857.850012.958.363014.656.780013.666.8100012.270.9125013.673.2160013.875.8200013.477.4250013.479.6315013.479.6400013.580.1500013.478.6630013.574.5800013.273.51000013.570.91250013.668.71600013.372SPL25.988.5N0.768.6median 13.5median 70.9Delta1.610.53533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 69.31.111.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic4 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 在高达100瓦的情况下快速充电

能源消耗

Magic4 Pro在最大亮度下的耗电量在空闲时略显过高。有了LTPO面板,这款智能手机的能源效率应该明显提高。同样,在我们的GFXBench测试中,Honor ,手机在较低的亮度设置下会消耗大量的电力。

使用附带的100瓦SuperCharge充电器,Magic4 Pro可以在20分钟内完全充电。还支持高达100瓦的无线充电。此外,Magic4 Pro还可以通过反向充电为其他具备Qi功能的设备充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.04 / 2.26 Watt
Load midlight 4.97 / 7.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Google Pixel 6 Pro
5003 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
2%
11%
30%
11%
12%
-16%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.94
-8%
0.7
20%
0.58
33%
0.6
31%
0.7
20%
1.24
-43%
1.295 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=14)
-49%
0.896 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=199, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Average *
2.04
1.24
39%
1.1
46%
0.71
65%
1.5
26%
1
51%
1.39
32%
2.09 ?(1.1 - 4.38, n=14)
-2%
1.651 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=199, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
1.34
41%
1.7
25%
1.16
49%
1.6
29%
1.04
54%
1.42
37%
2.28 ?(1.34 - 4.45, n=14)
-1%
1.87 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=199, last 2 years)
17%
Load Average *
4.97
5.7
-15%
6.4
-29%
7.07
-42%
3.5
30%
6.87
-38%
3.58
28%
5.58 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=14)
-12%
4.43 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=199, last 2 years)
11%
Load Maximum *
7.46
8.12
-9%
11.3
-51%
11.32
-52%
4.8
36%
9.87
-32%
6.99
6%
8.82 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=14)
-18%
7.29 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=199, last 2 years)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

012345678910Tooltip
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.84 (0.1246-10.8)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (0.511-12.8)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (6.94-8.13)
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø1.397 (1.254-1.8)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø0.977 (0.881-1.647)

电池寿命

Honor Magic4 Pro使用4600毫安时的电池,导致整体运行时间相当长。然而,我们的真实世界Wi-Fi测试(150尼特)似乎对智能手机的负担特别大,在这种情况下,它没有像大多数竞争对手那样持续很长时间,而是落在了与 Pixel 6 Pro.也就是说,电池寿命仍然很好,足以应付一整天的使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 102)
11h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 29min
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Google Pixel 6 Pro
5003 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
3%
21%
59%
-3%
5%
Reader / Idle
1346
2036
51%
1617
20%
1973
47%
2846
111%
1269
-6%
H.264
995
788
-21%
1121
13%
1078
8%
1522
53%
1142
15%
WiFi v1.3
687
766
11%
767
12%
844
23%
1067
55%
667
-3%
788
15%
Load
389
337
-13%
255
-34%
410
5%
452
16%
367
-6%

Pros

+ 明亮的120-Hz OLED显示屏
+ 极速充电
+ 带有VHT160的Wi-Fi 6
+ 非常精确的地理定位
+ IP68认证
+ 超声波指纹传感器和3D面部识别

Cons

- 没有Wi-Fi 6E
- 没有可选的存储扩展
- 尽管有LTPO,但有时会出现高消耗

结论 -Honor ,强势复出

在审查中。 Honor Magic4 Pro 5G。测试设备由Honor 。
在审查中。 Honor Magic4 Pro 5G。测试设备由Honor 。

通过Magic4 Pro,Honor ,试图通过向我们展示一款装备精良的高端智能手机来重温并不遥远的光辉岁月,它不需要躲避其竞争对手。

主要焦点在于相机设置,在我们的测试中产生了良好的效果,在视频拍摄能力方面似乎也取得了很大的进步。也就是说,在写这篇文章时,录制视频仍然不是一个完全流畅的体验。然而,我们相信视频卡顿的问题将在下一次更新中得到解决。

Honor Magic4 Pro是一款高端智能手机,具有良好的功能,能够以良好的相机、IP68认证、极快的充电速度和吸引人的设计而大放异彩。

凭借其明亮的LTPO显示屏、快速的Wi-Fi、IP68认证、快速的有线和无线充电、带桌面模式的USB 3.2以及快速的处理器,Honor 设备几乎没有留下任何不足之处。在Wi-Fi连接方面有一些小缺点,它不包括6GHz的频率。此外,显示屏的峰值亮度还可以再高一点。

如果你需要一个具有更大亮度的显示屏,可以选择 Galaxy S22 Ultra可能值得关注,因为它还具有更长的保证更新期。这款像素6 Pro是另一个潜在的选择,它有一个好的摄像头和一个低价格。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

对于非美国的客户,Honor Magic4 Pro在Honor "自己的商店 "上的售价约为1100欧元(建议零售价)。 并经常附带一些额外的产品,如外壳、智能手表或充电站。另外,这款智能手机还可以在非美国的在线零售商,如Amazon.co.uk和进口商店,如Tradingshenzhen分别售价约800英镑和975美元。

Honor Magic4 Pro - 07/11/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
69 / 70 → 98%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
88 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
78%
Average
83%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor Magic4 Pro 5G评测--功能多样的摄像智能手机,功能丰富
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-07-14 (Update: 2022-07-14)