Notebookcheck Logo

realme C31评测 - 低成本智能手机的旗舰?

价格低廉的中档产品。 如果你的预算不多,直到现在你还很难负担得起手机中的快速内存。realme C31在这里做了开创性的工作,以很低的价格带来了中档设备。然而,一些缺点仍然存在。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone
realme C31
realme C31 (C Series)
Processor
UNISOC T612 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 32 GB 
, 19 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 164.7 x 76.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10 watt charging
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.8, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @720p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB cable, charger, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.866 W/kg (head), 0.934 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
197 g
Price
139 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.9 %
05/2022
realme C31
T612, Mali-G52 MP1
197 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
73.6 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
196 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77.1 %
11/2021
Motorola Moto E40
Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳和功能 - 做工良好,有真实感

realme希望在2022年的低价手机领域获得成功,并为200欧元以下的价格区间带来了一些不久前你还只能梦想的功能。

realme C31是中欧地区目前最便宜的产品。它有两个存储版本。

  • realme C31 32GB大容量存储/3GB内存:140欧元
  • realme C31 64GB大容量存储/4GB内存:160欧元

我们得到了32GB的realme C31,用于测试浅银色,这是与深绿色一起的两种颜色变体之一。这两种色调的背面都有轻微的纹理,巧妙地增强了外观,给人一种塑料面板的愉快感觉。折射光线的射线效果,使其似乎从相机模块发出,也相当漂亮--realme称之为动态纹理设计。

手机做工非常好,在我们的测试中,外壳本身也被证明是非常稳定的:正面的压力只能通过屏幕上的液晶,而手机几乎不能被扭曲。

32GB的大容量存储并不完全是慷慨的,但在这个价格范围内并不罕见。存储空间可以通过专用的microSD插槽扩展,如果需要,甚至可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在我们用参考的microSD卡Angelbird V60进行的拷贝测试中,microSD读卡器被证明是相当慢的,但在CPDT基准测试中,它在同类产品中表现良好。

日常使用中令人讨厌的是:realme C31没有NFC功能,所以不能使用非接触式支付服务。

realme C31
realme C31
realme C31
realme C31
realme C31

尺寸比较

166.5 mm 75.9 mm 9.2 mm 196 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 9.1 mm 198 g164.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  (Angelbird V60)
50 MB/s ∼100% +227%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=77, last 2 years)
25.7 MB/s ∼51% +68%
realme C35
  (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼41% +34%
realme C31
  (Angelbird V60)
15.3 MB/s ∼31%
Motorola Moto E40
  (Angelbird V60)
11.8 MB/s ∼24% -23%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø30.7 (19.8-43.9)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø31.4 (18.7-39.4)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø24.6 (14.6-35.2)
realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø74.9 (58.6-79.3)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)
Samsung Galaxy A03s PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø55.2 (10.2-58.9)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø77.2 (42-85.8)

通信、软件和操作 - 无5GHz无线局域网

realme C31理论上支持WiFi 5,但没有5GHz频段,所以在我们使用参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的测试中,传输速率明显低于 realme C35:大约70-80MBit/s在这个级别中不是一个糟糕的速率,但它也不突出。

在移动通信方面,只有4G,而且只支持最必要的频率。因此,你应该检查你是否还能在东道国使用智能手机进行移动互联网,以便进一步旅行。在我们的简短样本中,事实证明,在接收强度方面,该智能手机在其价格范围内是相当可以的,但它不能跟上高端智能手机。

手机上的realme UI是基于Android 11,安全补丁是2022年4月的,因此在测试时是最新的。这对于这样一款廉价的手机来说是非常令人高兴的。预装的第三方应用程序被控制在一定范围内,这意味着如果你想要一个纯粹的系统,你几乎不必卸载任何东西。然而,令人讨厌的是,realme没有做任何DRM认证,所以你只能用SD观看许多大型门户网站的流媒体内容。

指纹传感器被整合到外壳右侧的待机按钮中。它可以用来直接从待机状态下解锁智能手机,但有一点延迟。在我们的测试中,手指总是被可靠地识别。如果需要,也可以通过面部识别来解锁手机。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
86.9 (78min - 93max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
802.11 b/g/n
52.5 (42min - 65max) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
87.2 (46min - 105max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
802.11 b/g/n
55.5 (50min - 63max) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100% +343%
realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
78.3 (73min - 92max) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼100% +237%
realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
72.5 (34min - 78max) MBit/s ∼30%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø72.5 (34-78)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø78.4 (73-92)

照相机--在给定的价格范围内质量正常

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

realme C31有一个1300万像素的主摄像头,采用索尼IMX258传感器。因此,这款智能手机在其价格范围内是一个很好的公司,即使是 摩托罗拉Moto E40其像素排列的相机名义上提供了更高的分辨率和更多的灵活性。

照片的颜色看起来有点苍白,细节也不是特别丰富。物体周围强烈的轮廓也时常可见。然而,这款智能手机可以用于快照。在弱光下,黑暗区域的细节几乎不可见,但你仍然可以识别图像内容。

该相机由一个200万像素的镜头支持,负责景深计算。还有一个微距相机,也是200万像素,用于极端特写。

用主摄像头拍摄的视频最大可以达到1080p和30fps。细节还不错,但自动对焦总是给自己一秒钟的思考时间,然后在对焦时轻微地跳动。

前面的自拍相机没有特别高的分辨率--500万像素。照片的细节看起来相当模糊,但如果你不那么仔细看,图片质量在这个价格范围内是可以的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C31: 12.63 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 23.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
27 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
36 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
90 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C31: 46.47 ∆E min: 13.11 - max: 89.97 ∆E

显示 - 正常分辨率,无PWM

子像素结构
子像素结构

在150欧元以下的智能手机中配备高清显示屏是很常见的,但你必须要有高于60赫兹的帧率。该显示屏在同级别的产品中具有最高413cd/m²的亮度传感器,但在户外非常明亮的日子里可能还是太少。至少亮度分布是相当均匀的。

在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,我们注意到显示屏上有相当强烈的蓝色偏光。此外,特别是黑暗区域的颜色变化相当强烈,这取决于观察角度。我们没有检测到PWM。

390
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 413 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 394.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 413 cd/m²
Contrast: 1033:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
Gamma: 2.395
realme C31
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A03s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Motorola Moto E40
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
24%
10%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
62 ?(33, 29)
50 ?(29, 21)
19%
54 ?(27, 27)
13%
44 ?(23, 21)
29%
Response Time Black / White *
34 ?(21, 13)
24 ?(9, 13)
29%
32 ?(17, 15)
6%
32 ?(15, 17)
6%
PWM Frequency
807 ?(10)
Screen
1%
-6%
7%
Brightness middle
413
585
42%
383
-7%
452
9%
Brightness
394
558
42%
354
-10%
431
9%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
88
-3%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.4
0.6
-50%
0.34
15%
0.46
-15%
Contrast
1033
975
-6%
1126
9%
983
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.89
4.4
10%
5.09
-4%
4.15
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.35
8.77
-5%
9.25
-11%
6.47
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
5.9
-20%
6.5
-33%
4
18%
Gamma
2.395 92%
2.228 99%
2.261 97%
2.157 102%
CCT
7598 86%
8001 81%
8152 80%
7557 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 6%
2% / -3%
13% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 快速内存

Unisoc Tiger T612作为SoC,realme C31在同类产品中装备精良,有足够的能力满足日常使用。它并不总是能够顺利地浏览菜单--特别是当更复杂的应用程序在后台运行时。在图形密集型的应用程序中, 摩托罗拉Moto E40在图形密集型应用中略有优势,因为它可以使用其芯片中的第二个图形核心。

在网上冲浪时,你还必须忍受等待时间。尤其是大型网站上的图片,需要时不时地等待一下,直到滚动后加载完毕。

谈到存储,realme将UFS 2.2内存带入其中,从而为加载时间提供了提升,也使系统整体上更顺畅一些。我们的测试设备没有达到realme C35的巨大传输率。 realme C35,至少在我们测试的32GB版本中没有。

在满负荷的情况下,最高温度为40℃,机箱的发热完全不是问题。

背面的小扬声器做得相当差,听起来相当重的高音,有时在最大音量下听起来很不舒服。如果你想连接外部音频设备,你可以通过3.5毫米或蓝牙5.0来实现。然而,最新的aptX编解码器,如aptX Adaptive或aptX LowLatency,则无法使用。

5000毫安时的电池现在是这个级别的标准,realme C31在我们的WLAN测试中实现了类似昂贵设备的典型运行时间,约为16小时。这通常对日常使用来说是绰绰有余的,即使在密集使用期间,你也经常可以在没有电源插座的情况下管理两天的时间。然而,由于realme C31的充电功率最大只有10瓦,所以给电池充电需要一段时间。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
346 Points ∼53%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼46% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
172 Points ∼27% -50%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
356 Points ∼55% +3%
Average UNISOC T612
 
346 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
649 Points ∼100% +88%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1322 Points ∼62%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼55% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼41% -33%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1393 Points ∼65% +5%
Average UNISOC T612
 
1322 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2142 Points ∼100% +62%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7776 Points ∼77%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼80% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5059 Points ∼50% -35%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8743 Points ∼87% +12%
Average UNISOC T612
 
7776 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=132, last 2 years)
10102 Points ∼100% +30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1527 Points ∼32%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1710 Points ∼36% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
877 Points ∼18% -43%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2202 Points ∼46% +44%
Average UNISOC T612
 
1527 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=241, last 2 years)
4806 Points ∼100% +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1343 Points ∼20%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1518 Points ∼23% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
809 Points ∼12% -40%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2052 Points ∼31% +53%
Average UNISOC T612
 
1343 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=241, last 2 years)
6602 Points ∼100% +392%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2942 Points ∼92%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3063 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1243 Points ∼39% -58%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼92% +1%
Average UNISOC T612
 
2942 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=239, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼100% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
989 Points ∼39%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1103 Points ∼43% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
457 Points ∼18% -54%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼58% +50%
Average UNISOC T612
 
989 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=195, last 2 years)
2566 Points ∼100% +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
834 Points ∼31%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
935 Points ∼35% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
387 Points ∼14% -54%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1309 Points ∼49% +57%
Average UNISOC T612
 
834 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=195, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼100% +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2832 Points ∼96%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2959 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1238 Points ∼42% -56%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2821 Points ∼95% 0%
Average UNISOC T612
 
2832 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=195, last 2 years)
2862 Points ∼97% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
988 Points ∼25%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1109 Points ∼28% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
522 Points ∼13% -47%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1554 Points ∼40% +57%
Average UNISOC T612
 
988 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=245, last 2 years)
3932 Points ∼100% +298%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
829 Points ∼17%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
939 Points ∼19% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
447 Points ∼9% -46%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points ∼28% +65%
Average UNISOC T612
 
829 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=245, last 2 years)
4831 Points ∼100% +483%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2990 Points ∼93%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3036 Points ∼94% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1259 Points ∼39% -58%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points ∼92% -1%
Average UNISOC T612
 
2990 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=245, last 2 years)
3213 Points ∼100% +7%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
411 Points ∼13%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
463 Points ∼14% +13%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
729 Points ∼22% +77%
Average UNISOC T612
 
411 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=170, last 2 years)
3262 Points ∼100% +694%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points ∼12%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
464 Points ∼14% +13%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
722 Points ∼22% +76%
Average UNISOC T612
 
410 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=168, last 2 years)
3351 Points ∼100% +717%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
117 Points ∼12%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
129 Points ∼13% +10%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
184 Points ∼18% +57%
Average UNISOC T612
 
117 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=122, last 2 years)
995 Points ∼100% +750%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points ∼11%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
126 Points ∼13% +14%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
183 Points ∼19% +65%
Average UNISOC T612
 
111 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=119, last 2 years)
973 Points ∼100% +777%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps ∼36%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.4 fps ∼19% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.5 fps ∼27% -25%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼69% +90%
Average UNISOC T612
 
10 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=259, last 2 years)
27.7 fps ∼100% +177%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps ∼16%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼18% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼12% -23%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼33% +108%
Average UNISOC T612
 
5.3 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=260, last 2 years)
33.1 fps ∼100% +525%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps ∼34%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3.4 fps ∼18% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼25% -27%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼63% +88%
Average UNISOC T612
 
6.4 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=260, last 2 years)
19 fps ∼100% +197%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C31
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps ∼15%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps ∼12% -21%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps ∼29% +95%
Average UNISOC T612
 
1.9 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=260, last 2 years)
12.7 fps ∼100% +568%
realme C31realme C35Samsung Galaxy A03sMotorola Moto E40Average 32 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
122%
-31%
-29%
0%
134%
Sequential Read 256KB
478.8
907.1
89%
279.8
-42%
265
-45%
479
0%
891 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
86%
Sequential Write 256KB
131.9
271.1
106%
86.8
-34%
156.3
18%
131.9
0%
430 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=260, last 2 years)
226%
Random Read 4KB
89
137.8
55%
64
-28%
56
-37%
89
0%
158.5 ?(13.5 - 325, n=260, last 2 years)
78%
Random Write 4KB
61.5
206.4
236%
48.7
-21%
30.7
-50%
61.5
0%
151.3 ?(5.5 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
146%

温度

Max. Load
 40 °C37.7 °C36.7 °C 
 39.8 °C37.3 °C37.8 °C 
 39.7 °C38 °C37.3 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
34.5 °C38.3 °C39.3 °C
35.2 °C38.2 °C40.3 °C
35.7 °C38.6 °C40.9 °C
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs205353.42544.544.63133.731.74033.4345035.837.36330.128.78021.323.81002123.512516.325.516014.730.520012.934.725014.340.93151342.840010.847.850012.356.263013.56380019.567.210001572.6125014.171.9160014.968.8200011.966.5250012.867315015.464.7400016.564.6500016.764.5630017.268.980001872.91000017.974.91250017.671.11600018.357.2SPL2881N0.947.2median 15median 64.6Delta2.111.945.541.542.240.533.834.539.139.444.143.434.436.325.62624.226.120.227.921.232.917.332.518.139.816.145.715.453.816.463.817.167.720.872.820.977.517.976.218.173.8187118.86819.865.320.571.520.871.521.674.722.372.22374.523.871.224.76832.384.71.659.6median 20.2median 68211.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme C31Motorola Moto E40
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme C31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

realme C31
5000 mAh
realme C35
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A03s
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto E40
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
947
958
1%
1193
26%
995
5%
904 ?(438 - 1953, n=268, last 2 years)
-5%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 47min

Pros

+ 稳定的住房
+ 运行时间长
+ 快速的内存
+ 当前的安全补丁

Cons

- 无DRM L1
- 没有NFC
- 平庸的扬声器

结论 - 低价格范围内的独特功能

评测中:realme C31。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
评测中:realme C31。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

realme将UFS存储整合到一部部分价格低于150欧元的智能手机中,这是个小小的轰动。这种快速的存储,别致而稳定的外壳,以及良好的电池运行时间,都对整体印象产生了积极影响。

相机不能从大量的廉价手机中脱颖而出,但在类似的钱中肯定有更慢的手机。事实上,安全补丁显然是不断更新的,这在低于200欧元的价格范围内不一定常见,但对于realme C31来说仍然是这样。

一款非常便宜的手机,拥有快速的内存。

如果允许我们表达对下一代的愿望,我们会希望有NFC、DRM认证、改进的相机和90赫兹的屏幕。即便如此,realme C31在入门级类别中也是一款装备精良的手机。

如果你想用很少的钱买一个90赫兹的屏幕,你应该看看 摩托罗拉Moto E40.如果你再加几欧元,你会得到一个很好的价格,那就是 真格C35它有更快的内存,更快的WLAN,以及更明亮的屏幕。

价格和可用性

realme C31可直接从制造商处购买。价格为140欧元起。在测试的时候,这款手机在互联网上甚至更便宜,例如在我们的合作伙伴amazon.deCyberport.

realme C31 - 05/05/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
40 / 70 → 58%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
10 / 64 → 15%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 90 → 58%
Camera
47%
Average
70%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 233204 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme C31评测 - 低成本智能手机的旗舰?
Florian Schmitt, 2022-05- 7 (Update: 2022-05- 7)