Xiaomi Mi5s
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 36 scores (from 66 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Mi5s
Source: Android Central
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAs the Mi 5s has been in the market for a few months now, it has picked up a price cut that brings the cost of the phone down to under $300. As you can't buy it directly from Xiaomi, you'll have to rely on resellers. GearBest is selling it for $289 after entering code Mi5GSB. If you're in a market where LTE connectivity is available, the Mi 5s is a no-brainer for the cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Fudzilla
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Mi5s is an evolution of the Mi5, and it’s better than its predecessor in almost every respect. However, it’s not that much better, because it’s almost the same phone, updated with a new SoC and camera module. In other words, nobody who owns a Mi5 or a different Snapdragon 820 device will be interested in the Mi5s.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Mobile Choice
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionXiaomi's revised Mi 5 adds in some key areas, like camera quality, while leaving us wanting more in others. Built quality is suspect, and that much-hyped fingerprint scanner truly is one of the worst we've used - it only worked about 60% of the time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 100% mobility: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWe cannot recommend the Xiaomi Mi5s enough. This is the smartphone every 2016 flagship wanted to be, and it comes with a price tag half that of theirs. Fantastic build quality, fantastic performance, fantastic storage, battery and connectivity options - the Xiaomi Mi5s gets a big thumbs-up from us.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90%
Source: Androidbeat
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Mi 5s is the perfect ‘s’ upgrade to the Mi 5. It improves in all key areas — build quality, camera, and performance — to deliver a vastly improved experience than its predecessor. Ideally, the Mi 5s is what the Mi 5 should have originally been. Nonetheless, if you have been holding out on buying the Mi 5 for some reason, go ahead and just buy the Mi 5s. It can hold its own against many other newer flagships and is a great phone for the price it commands. It truly is a shame that Xiaomi will not be bringing the Mi 5s to India where it could have been a formidable competitor to the likes of OnePlus 3 and Moto Z Play.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionXiaomi Mi 5s is a great flagship with excellent build quality, performance, battery life, and imaging skills. It makes a few notable upgrades over the Mi 5 predecessor - a metal unibody, a bigger battery, a more power-efficient chipset, and a capable main camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Yugatech
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNubia Z11 Mini S and Xiaomi MI5S can have nice similarity in camera, design, and battery, but in terms of hardware, Xiaomi MI5S can win over Nubia Z11 Mini not only in terms of antutu. But considering the price, Nubia Z11 Mini S RAM 4GB ROM 64GB version sells at 1499 yuan, $250, RAM 4GB ROM 128GB black golden advanced version at 1899 yuan, $316, but Xiaomi MI5S RAM 3GB ROM 64GB at 1999 yuan, $330, and RAM 4GB ROM 128GB version at 2299 yuan, $383. Therefore, if you don’t pursue too high-end performance, Nubia Z11 Mini S is enough to use, but you are a game lover, we highly recommend choosing Xiaomi MI5S.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Igeekphone
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn all, Xiaomi MI5S can compare with Galaxy S7 with the good performance to prove Xiaomi has entered into the International market to compete with Samsung and Apple. Personally, we think we don’t have to spend much money on a smartphone.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Igeekphone
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAlthough Xiaomi MI5S and ZUK Z2 Pro has different processor, according to real test, they have no large gap in hardware, however, in design and camera, ZUK Z2 Pro can win over Xiaomi MI5S. Therefore, we still think ZUK Z2 Pro is more beautiful, especially back design. Just share more with us.
User Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: Igeekphone
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAccording to teardown, Xiaomi MI5S internal design has nice layout, the back metal cover has used Injection molding with exquisite processing for better cooling, such as the graphite stickers, in order to keep the phone’s thickness, it uses shield to ditch the OIS and Infrared function. The overall tear down is not so difficult, but about the maintenance, if the ultrasonic fingerprint scanner is broken, it is a little difficult to repair or change.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 94% features: 58% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Welt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 96% features: 93% display: 97% mobility: 98%
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 93% display: 92% mobility: 88%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Andro Asia
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 85%
Source: Profesional Review
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Xataka
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Profesional Review
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Andro 4 All
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: El Sabio Informatico
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2016
Source: El Confidencial
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: 4G News
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/10/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 84% mobility: 84% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 84% mobility: 84% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% features: 93% display: 93% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Panorama
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Clubic
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: One Tech
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: Spiders Web
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir
TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tekno Seyir
TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 100% display: 88% mobility: 78%
Source: Ferra.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: AndroidInsider.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Portal
SK→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
820 MSM8996:
整合四核处理器(两颗2.15GHz高速核心以及两颗1.6GHz节能核心)和Adreno 530显卡的高端ARM系统芯片。使用14纳米HPM技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.