Notebookcheck

华硕Zenbook 14X OLED预生产单元回顾。这是很有冲击力的颜色!

迷人的颜色,时尚的外壳,伟大的声音 华硕的14英寸笔记本电脑结合了令人惊叹的OLED显示屏和一流的外壳,既结实又高质量。由于MX450和来自英特尔的Tiger Lake SoC,性能也应该很好。继续阅读,了解我们对预产型号的喜欢和不喜欢之处。
Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Tiger Lake Thunderbolt Windows
华硕Zenbook 14X--优雅的副笔记本在外观和内部都留下了良好的印象。
华硕Zenbook 14X--优雅的副笔记本在外观和内部都留下了良好的印象。

华硕已将亮度作为2021年的首要任务。其许多笔记本电脑系列现在将默认配备OLED显示屏。这将OLED技术和3K/4K分辨率带入较低的价格范围。中端客户将开始认真考虑购买OLED面板,现在与没有OLED的设备的差异不再是500欧元(约581美元),而是只有200至300欧元(约232美元至约349美元)。

也就是说,华硕的Zenbook 14X并没有提供中档的硬件和做工。机箱具有高于平均水平的坚固性和质量。包括ScreenPad(ClickPad=第二块显示屏)在内的输入设备都是一流的,使用Core i7和GeForce MX450的性能在次笔记本联盟中几乎是顶级的。

然而,竞争对手也不甘示弱,提供了一个强大的对手,例如戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED 。唯一的区别是没有DGPU吗?我们对Zenbook 14X只有赞美之词,还是有一些批评之处?请在我们的评论中找出答案。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E (Zenbook 14X Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 4.7 GHz, 61 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake UP3
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB, Core: 1575 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, 32 W TDP, GDDR6, TU117M, 462.59, Iris Xe Graphics GT2 96EUs
Memory
16384 MB 
, quad-channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, Samsung SDC4154, OLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB 
, NVMe v1.3, 870 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.0 (Dual band) 2*2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.9 x 311.2 x 221.2
Battery
63 Wh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p with e-shutter
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.4 kg, Power Supply: 407 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
10/2021
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.4 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
88 %
06/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.40"3456x2160
09/2021
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8 R4000
1.1 kg14.8 mm13.30"1920x1080
86.5 %
02/2021
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
85.3 %
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg17 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.1 %
02/2021
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.2 %
04/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm14.00"3840x2160
82.2 %
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

外壳 - 高品质的笔记本电脑

这款14英寸的笔记本电脑的厚度为16.9毫米,当然不是最薄的笔记本电脑。
这款14英寸的笔记本电脑的厚度为16.9毫米,当然不是最薄的笔记本电脑。

仅仅是机箱就已经相当令人印象深刻了。华硕并没有追求最轻的机箱,但作为回报,它实现了一个特别抗扭的机箱。当施加正常的力量时,盖子不能被压入!这是很罕见的--即使是在最高质量的笔记本中。这是非常罕见的--即使是在最高质量的副笔记本中。盖子的铝背与集成的显示面板(非触摸)形成了一个似乎坚不可摧的单元。

严格的质量也延伸到了铰链。关闭的位置通过磁力固定在底座上,然后用一根手指就可以打开盖子。在这之后,铰链提供了一个牢固的抓地力,在携带或举起设备时,一切都能保持原位。

完全由铝制成的底座也不例外。它只能在某些地方从下面压进去一点。键盘在任何时候都不会弯曲,而底座本身也完全牢固。

Zenbook的重量为1.4公斤,是较重的机型之一。只有HP Envy 14-eb0010nr,超过了1.6公斤。与较轻的14英寸和13英寸设备的平均值相比,差距为100克。然而,你会得到一个更坚固的底盘作为回报。在我们的比较中,最薄的型号是戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED,14.8毫米,只有1.2公斤。

Size comparison

319 mm 199 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg319 mm 219 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg318 mm 200.9 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg313.1 mm 224 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg311.2 mm 221.2 mm 16.9 mm 1.4 kg307 mm 195 mm 17 mm 1.3 kg304.2 mm 203 mm 14.8 mm 1.1 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.2 kg

连接性 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的华硕设备

华硕提供了两个Type-C Thunderbolt 4端口。它们可以输出图像信号(DisplayPort),也可以用来连接电源适配器(100瓦)。包括HDMI,可以连接三个显示器。然而,在实践中,如果同时使用Type-C充电器,它将被限制为两个。

左边:USB 3.1 Gen 2
左边:USB 3.1 Gen 2
右边。读卡器:microSD,2个Thunderbolt USB 3.2 Gen 2x2,3.5毫米组合音频插孔,HDMI 2.0b
右边。读卡器:microSD,2个Thunderbolt USB 3.2 Gen 2x2,3.5毫米组合音频插孔,HDMI 2.0b

SD卡阅读器

和它的同类产品一样,这个微型SD读卡器的表现一般,但不是很好。我们用128GB的AV PRO V60 microSD进行测试。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
164.4 MB/s ∼100% +118%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
79.2 MB/s ∼48% +5%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
  (AV Pro V60)
76.6 MB/s ∼47% +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.9 - 195, n=53, last 2 years)
76.1 MB/s ∼46% +1%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
75.9 MB/s ∼46% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
75.4 MB/s ∼46%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
24.9 MB/s ∼15% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
173.9 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.2 MB/s ∼50% +2%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
  (AV Pro V60)
86 MB/s ∼49% +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.3 - 206, n=52, last 2 years)
86 MB/s ∼49% +2%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
85.3 MB/s ∼49% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.7 MB/s ∼49%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
24.2 MB/s ∼14% -71%

沟通

Wi-Fi模块 - 已焊接
Wi-Fi模块 - 已焊接

英特尔AX201 Wi-Fi芯片集成在设备中,所以它不能被替换。在我们的测试中,传输速率多次明显低于平均水平,所以它们并不代表AX201通常的能力。我们将此归因于我们的预生产样品中的次优驱动配置,并期望在生产模型中获得更好的结果。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (1280min - 1509max) MBit/s ∼100% +74%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1365 (1309min - 1394max) MBit/s ∼96% +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1347 (1144min - 1451max) MBit/s ∼94% +64%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1336 (1053min - 1440max) MBit/s ∼94% +63%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1192 (526min - 1384max) MBit/s ∼84% +45%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=296)
1158 MBit/s ∼81% +41%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (49.8 - 1614, n=109, last 2 years)
937 MBit/s ∼66% +14%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
821 (773min - 874max) MBit/s ∼58%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
617 (220min - 685max) MBit/s ∼43% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1459 (1045min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +119%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (1278min - 1503max) MBit/s ∼97% +113%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1229min - 1441max) MBit/s ∼97% +112%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (681min - 1483max) MBit/s ∼94% +105%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1336 (1246min - 1419max) MBit/s ∼92% +100%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1313 (1251min - 1558max) MBit/s ∼90% +97%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=296)
1254 MBit/s ∼86% +88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (240 - 1658, n=111, last 2 years)
1047 MBit/s ∼72% +57%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
667 (634min - 690max) MBit/s ∼46%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (634-690)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1458 (1045-1609)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1420 (1278-1503)
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø821 (773-874)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1427 (1280-1509)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (1144-1451)

网络摄像头

我们评测样品中的网络摄像头没有反应,电子快门(摄像头前面的橙色快门)对相应的Fn键没有反应。我们推测这是个生产前的错误。

在我们的预生产设备中,e-shutter网络摄像头没有反应。
在我们的预生产设备中,e-shutter网络摄像头没有反应。

维护

打开Zenbook的过程很复杂,因为有隐藏在橡胶脚下的螺丝。之后,盖子可以很容易地被掀开。然而,这里没有什么可维护的,因为Wi-Fi模块和RAM都是焊接的(没有插座)。

在橡胶脚下隐藏着一些螺丝。
在橡胶脚下隐藏着一些螺丝。
此后,掀开底盖很容易。
此后,掀开底盖很容易。
SSD存储采用M.2 2260格式
SSD存储采用M.2 2260格式

安全问题

指纹传感器集成在电源按钮中
指纹传感器集成在电源按钮中

电源键上有一个指纹传感器,非常不显眼:你可以通过物理传感器快速登录,而且没有为单独的指纹识别模块浪费空间。主板上的TPM(可信平台模块)固件已经成为标准,是Windows 11的基本要求。在某些方面,这个加密处理器的行为就像一张永久安装的智能卡,但它与本地计算机而不是用户捆绑在一起。

担保

Zenbook 14X在德国的商店里还没有上市。华硕在德国通常提供两年的提货和退货保证。

输入设备 - 生产性的双显示器

哑光的防滑键有一个明显的压力点,行程适中,键程牢固。打字时几乎无声。由于采用了三段式白色背光,在较暗的环境中工作是可能的。

总的来说,宽大的键盘上有大的Shift、Ctrl和方向键,使用户能够快速打字。按笔记本电脑的标准,按键之间的间距相当大(2.5毫米)。键盘的稳固底座是一个非常积极的方面。在任何时候都不会有任何弯曲。

键盘的整个区域都有一个坚实的基础。因此,敲击键盘的声音很坚定。
键盘的整个区域都有一个坚实的基础。因此,敲击键盘的声音很坚定。

触摸板

ClickPad对边缘很敏感,并提供一个短的行程。它的操作有一种沉闷的、安静的噪音。哑光表面相当光滑,但不滑溜。它为手指的滑动提供了一个舒适的表面。我们发现短行程不令人满意,但这是个人品味的问题。

当需要时,垫子可以变成一个显示屏。垫子功能可以通过覆盖物即时使用,或者通过停用显示功能(Fn+F6)来长时间使用。

ScreenPad 2.0是哑光的,分辨率为全高清+(2160x1080)。这是一块IPS面板。在Windows中,副显示屏作为一个扩展桌面运行,就像任何HDMI连接的显示器一样。你可以将窗口拖入其中,例如Steam应用、编辑器或Photoshop的工具。

数字签名在ScreenPad上进行,因为OLED面板毕竟是非触摸的。华硕在ScreenPad上预装了组。每个组都可以用在小显示屏上有用的应用程序来填充。例如,手写、数字键盘、应用商店、计算器或Spotify。

12.7厘米宽的ClickPad有一个清晰的压力点和一个短的行程。
12.7厘米宽的ClickPad有一个清晰的压力点和一个短的行程。
ClickPad可以根据需要变成一个显示器。
ClickPad可以根据需要变成一个显示器。
例如,这允许用户的Steam账户保持可见。
例如,这允许用户的Steam账户保持可见。

显示

三星SDC4154 OLED面板的像素网格
三星SDC4154 OLED面板的像素网格

购买Zenbook 14X的主要理由是其14英寸OLED面板。三星提供了一个WQXGA+面板,像素为2880x1800(16:10)。刷新率为90赫兹,响应时间为0.2毫秒,这个充满活力的显示屏胜过任何IPS型号。

它还承诺100%的DCI-P3色域,我们可以通过测量证实这一点。华硕表示,亮度达到500尼特;我们平均测量了381cd/m²,最大为401cd/m²。尼特和cd/m²是1:1转换的,这意味着我们无法测量制造商宣传的亮度。亮度的分布是均匀的。

无论如何,高亮度对OLED显示器是有害的,所以它们不应该被长期使用。关于烧毁的问题,华硕用一个不能被禁用的OLED屏保来回应。它在15分钟后激活,对保护面板很重要。根据制造商的说法,用户可以在被告知相关风险(警告信息)后禁用屏保。这应该可以通过个人的MyAsus设置(需要账户)。我们在Windows 10的显示设置中没有找到关闭屏幕保护程序的选项。

屏占比为92%,这是一个非常窄的边框,围绕着大量的显示屏。三星的面板利用直流调光来降低亮度。

华硕在Zenbook 14X的阵容中有三种面板选择:与我们的评测单元一样的WQXGA+(2880x1800)非触摸版本,同样的面板但有触摸功能,以及4K触摸(3840x2400)选项。诸如HDR真黑600、100% DCI-P3和92%的屏占比等规格在所有变体中都是相同的。

382
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC4154
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 381.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 379 cd/m²
Contrast: 3790:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.42
ΔE Greyscale 2.12 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Samsung SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Au Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
B140ZAN01.7, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
Display
1%
-28%
-53%
-14%
-9%
Display P3 Coverage
100
99.67
0%
60.88
-39%
39.9
-60%
77.11
-23%
87.37
-13%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
90.37
-10%
58.8
-41%
99.81
0%
99.92
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96
97.68
2%
62.25
-35%
41.2
-57%
76.66
-20%
81.13
-15%
Response Times
-10%
-1575%
-925%
-2580%
-2040%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
-10%
39 ?(20, 19)
-1850%
25 ?(11, 14)
-1150%
61.2 ?(30, 31.2)
-2960%
48.4 ?(26.4, 22)
-2320%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
-10%
28 ?(17, 11)
-1300%
16 ?(9, 7)
-700%
46 ?(24, 22)
-2200%
37.2 ?(20.8, 16.4)
-1760%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(51)
92 ?(10)
Screen
-32%
-84%
-61%
-25%
-66%
Brightness middle
379
384
1%
323
-15%
347
-8%
412
9%
475.8
26%
Brightness
381
387
2%
313
-18%
311
-18%
392
3%
463
22%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
80
-14%
81
-13%
81
-13%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.1
0.36
-260%
0.12
-20%
0.32
-220%
0.44
-340%
Contrast
3790
897
-76%
2892
-24%
1288
-66%
1081
-71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
4.56
-98%
4.86
-111%
5.05
-120%
1.88
18%
3.81
-66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.16
7.27
-75%
7.52
-81%
16.98
-308%
3.06
26%
6.96
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.42
4.52
-87%
3.64
-50%
1.96
19%
2.55
-5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.12
1.5
29%
4.83
-128%
1.63
23%
2.2
-4%
4.1
-93%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.26 97%
2.64 83%
2.3 96%
2.1 105%
2.14 103%
CCT
6219 105%
7405 88%
6666 98%
6650 98%
6564 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.1
57.5
38
68.7
72.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
90.3
58
99.8
99.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -20%
-562% / -285%
-346% / -192%
-873% / -388%
-705% / -336%

* ... smaller is better

正如人们所期望的那样,OLED显示屏具有出色的对比度(3,790:1);黑色很深,颜色很鲜艳。作为典型的OLED,其响应时间也很好。用于降低亮度的PWM在50%及以下的亮度水平上设置,使显示器以362Hz的频率闪烁。敏感的用户可能会受此影响,尽管我们在实践中很少将亮度调整到50%以下。在日光下的正常办公室使用中,我们在60-70%的水平上操作。

我们测量了校准前的灰度和彩色DeltaE值,分别为2.4和2.3,这是非常好的数值,因为它们低于3.0。校准改善了灰度(1.8),但色彩变得更糟(2.4)。简而言之:你可以跳过校准,因为出厂时校准的面板不能被改善。

AdobeRGB覆盖率为100%
AdobeRGB覆盖率为100%
sRGB覆盖率为100%
sRGB覆盖率为100%
P3的覆盖率为96%。
P3的覆盖率为96%。
卡尔曼--饱和度P3
卡尔曼--饱和度P3
卡尔曼--已校准的饱和度P3
卡尔曼--已校准的饱和度P3
卡尔曼-格雷斯卡尔P3
卡尔曼-格雷斯卡尔P3
卡尔曼--已校准的灰度P3
卡尔曼--已校准的灰度P3
卡尔曼--颜色 P3
卡尔曼--颜色 P3
卡尔曼--颜色P3已校准
卡尔曼--颜色P3已校准

光滑的表面(非触摸)在户外受到反射的影响,而高亮度在这里没有什么帮助。该面板可以在阴暗的地方很好地使用,部分原因是在电池供电的情况下亮度不会降低(显示屏中心的亮度为379 cd/m²)。

反射是一个问题。
反射是一个问题。
由于亮度高,在户外的阴凉处也能很好地工作。
由于亮度高,在户外的阴凉处也能很好地工作。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 50 % brightness setting

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20894 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

毫无疑问,OLED面板提供了最好的可视角度。即使从平坦的角度看,颜色仍然稳定,亮度也不会失去强度。

无论从哪个角度看,OLED面板都很不错。
无论从哪个角度看,OLED面板都很不错。

性能 - 有瓶颈的MX450

冷却系统不得不用一个风扇来解决。
冷却系统不得不用一个风扇来解决。

华硕选择了Tiger Lake 28瓦的英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7(2.8GHz),集成英特尔Iris Xe G7显卡(12代)。后者由Nvidia英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7 补充,可以禁用(Optimus)。对价格敏感的买家来说,将有一个配备i5-1135G7(2.4 GHz)的变体,这也将与MX450 。目标群体包括专业用户,他们正在寻找一款令人尊敬的、具有高端显示屏和全面性能的便携式笔记本电脑,用于工作和娱乐。

HWiNFO摘要
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
gpu-z mx450 tu117m
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics GT2 96EUs

处理器

Core i7-1165G7(2.8 GHz)的PL1为50瓦,PL2(短期)为61瓦。实际上,处理器只在61瓦的情况下运行了几秒钟,当Cinebench R15运行一次(100%的CPU负载)时,PL2值短暂地触及60瓦的大关。PL1值也只在短时间内维持在50瓦,在五秒钟内下降到28瓦。CPU包的平均消耗量为35瓦,开始时的峰值高达45瓦。

这种情况在电池供电时发生了变化,PL1/PL2值根本没有被使用;CPU包的功耗短暂地刮到了20瓦的大关,然后以7瓦的速度持续运行。其结果是。在R15测试中,没有达到951分,而只有284分(30%)。

该循环显示,Zenbook 14X的Turbo稳定性不理想,这与其他i7-1165G7设备基本一致。正如我们经常看到的那样,Ryzen 7 5700U在这方面发挥的作用完全不同,但它的Turbo在第一次运行后也会减弱。

在所有Cinebench测试中,i7-1165G7在多核情况下落后于Ryzen 7 5700U,差距很大(-24%)。在单核模式下情况正好相反,i7以很大的优势领先(+17%)。总而言之,与具有相同芯片组的其他型号相比,该SoC的性能略高于平均水平。

在Cinebench R15单次运行期间,PL1、PL2、温度、封装功率
在Cinebench R15单次运行期间,PL1、PL2、温度、封装功率
Cinebench R15 单一的电池电量
Cinebench R15 单一的电池电量

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø854 (813.17-950.82)
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1197 (1162.76-1405.04)
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø695 (607.28-765.86)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø603 (589.73-747.11)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø771 (684.76-915.3)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø687 (682.5-699.4)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø699 (656.49-769.7)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
7697 Points ∼100% +31%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6136 (5867.5min - 6136.37max) Points ∼80% +4%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5876 Points ∼76%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (965 - 12181, n=62, last 2 years)
5591 Points ∼73% -5%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5590 Points ∼73% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5302 (4859.81min - 5301.57max) Points ∼69% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (3037 - 6862, n=56)
5102 Points ∼66% -13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5013 (4398.92min - 5012.66max) Points ∼65% -15%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4301 Points ∼56% -27%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4266 Points ∼55% -27%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1525 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1476 Points ∼97%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1457 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1196 - 1539, n=51)
1425 Points ∼93% -3%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1397 Points ∼92% -5%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1337 Points ∼88% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (409 - 1624, n=60, last 2 years)
1331 Points ∼87% -10%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1261 Points ∼83% -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
2765 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2398 Points ∼87%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2382 Points ∼86% -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2108 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1189 - 2657, n=73)
1963 Points ∼71% -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1873 Points ∼68% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (110 - 4704, n=117, last 2 years)
1805 Points ∼65% -25%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1679 Points ∼61% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1611 Points ∼58% -33%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1452 Points ∼53% -39%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
571 Points ∼98%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
556 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (467 - 589, n=73)
552 Points ∼95% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
548 Points ∼94% -4%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
544 Points ∼94% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
516 Points ∼89% -10%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
503 Points ∼87% -12%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
493 Points ∼85% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (73 - 620, n=117, last 2 years)
454 Points ∼78% -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1405 (1162.76min - 1405.04max) Points ∼100% +48%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
951 (813.17min - 950.82max) Points ∼68%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
925 (891.54min - 924.6max) Points ∼66% -3%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
915 Points ∼65% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (599 - 1027, n=78)
847 Points ∼60% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (82.3 - 2024, n=123, last 2 years)
829 Points ∼59% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
770 (656.49min - 769.7max) Points ∼55% -19%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
766 (607.28min - 765.86max) Points ∼55% -19%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Points ∼53% -21%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
699 (682.5min - 699.4max) Points ∼50% -26%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
221 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (158 - 230, n=70)
214 Points ∼97% +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
210 Points ∼95% +11%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
206 Points ∼93% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
203 Points ∼92% +7%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
202 Points ∼91% +6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
198 Points ∼90% +4%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
190 Points ∼86%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
185 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 239, n=114, last 2 years)
178 Points ∼81% -6%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4.2 - 6277, n=111, last 2 years)
840 Seconds * ∼100% -60%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
692 Seconds * ∼82% -32%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
686 Seconds * ∼82% -31%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
637 Seconds * ∼76% -21%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (468 - 958, n=72)
613 Seconds * ∼73% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
585 Seconds * ∼70% -11%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
543 Seconds * ∼65% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
525 Seconds * ∼63%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
499 Seconds * ∼59% +5%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
401.6 Seconds * ∼48% +24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
35971 MIPS ∼100% +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
24500 MIPS ∼68% +8%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24188 MIPS ∼67% +6%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
24151 MIPS ∼67% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (15347 - 27405, n=72)
22925 MIPS ∼64% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22747 MIPS ∼63%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3267 - 54374, n=112, last 2 years)
22149 MIPS ∼62% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
21119 MIPS ∼59% -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
18812 MIPS ∼52% -17%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
18588 MIPS ∼52% -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5348 MIPS ∼100% +16%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5225 MIPS ∼98% +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5209 MIPS ∼97% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (4625 - 5507, n=72)
5197 MIPS ∼97% +12%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5045 MIPS ∼94% +9%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4694 MIPS ∼88% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4625 MIPS ∼86%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4476 MIPS ∼84% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 5800, n=112, last 2 years)
4429 MIPS ∼83% -4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
3678 MIPS ∼69% -20%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6733 Points ∼100% +21%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5771 Points ∼86% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5637 Points ∼84% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5574 Points ∼83%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5310 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (3872 - 5926, n=68)
5230 Points ∼78% -6%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4899 Points ∼73% -12%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4695 Points ∼70% -16%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4693 Points ∼70% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (591 - 7590, n=112, last 2 years)
4494 Points ∼67% -19%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1569 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1541 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1530 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1302 - 1595, n=68)
1527 Points ∼97% +1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1514 Points ∼96% 0%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1507 Points ∼96%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points ∼95% -1%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1406 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (293 - 1740, n=112, last 2 years)
1222 Points ∼78% -19%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1181 Points ∼75% -22%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8.61 fps ∼100% +24%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
7.6 fps ∼88% +9%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.97 fps ∼81%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.9 fps ∼80% -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.73 fps ∼78% -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.34 fps ∼74% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1.39 - 8.47, n=72)
6.33 fps ∼74% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.65 - 14.8, n=107, last 2 years)
5.86 fps ∼68% -16%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.64 fps ∼66% -19%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.38 fps ∼62% -23%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.9 - 281, n=105, last 2 years)
66.3 s * ∼100% -30%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
59.7 s * ∼90% -17%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
55 s * ∼83% -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
54.2 s * ∼82% -6%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.4 s * ∼78% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
50.9 s * ∼77%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
49.6 s * ∼75% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
49.3 s * ∼74% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (21.5 - 88.1, n=70)
48.8 s * ∼74% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
43.2 s * ∼65% +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.501 - 2.21, n=111, last 2 years)
0.722 sec * ∼100% -16%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.634 sec * ∼88% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.62 sec * ∼86%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.606 sec * ∼84% +2%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.601 sec * ∼83% +3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.594 sec * ∼82% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (0.552 - 1.002, n=72)
0.592 sec * ∼82% +5%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.585 sec * ∼81% +6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.571 sec * ∼79% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.571 sec * ∼79% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
951 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Help

系统性能

根据PCMark 10,Zenbook 14X在应用性能方面处于领先地位,特别是在生产力方面。该基准测试在这里利用了超快的SK Hynix固态硬盘的优势。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5410 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4823 - 5814, n=8)
5321 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5234 Points ∼97%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5226 Points ∼97% 0%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5160 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5150 Points ∼95% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4982 Points ∼92% -5%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4823 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (790 - 6414, n=109, last 2 years)
4372 Points ∼81% -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
10492 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9883 Points ∼94% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8088 - 9955, n=8)
9136 Points ∼87% +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9079 Points ∼87% +3%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9047 Points ∼86% +3%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
9036 Points ∼86% +3%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8774 Points ∼84%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2544 - 10836, n=109, last 2 years)
8713 Points ∼83% -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8088 Points ∼77% -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8762 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (7826 - 9292, n=8)
8574 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8386 Points ∼96% -4%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
8342 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8312 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7826 Points ∼89% -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
6964 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6719 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1304 - 9852, n=109, last 2 years)
6474 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5701 Points ∼100% +13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5304 Points ∼93% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4812 - 5878, n=8)
5228 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5064 Points ∼89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5055 Points ∼89% 0%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4960 Points ∼87% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points ∼85% -4%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4812 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 6709, n=109, last 2 years)
4098 Points ∼72% -19%
PCMark 10 Score
5234 points
Help

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),Zenbook出现了延迟升高的问题。这是由内核模式的驱动程序造成的。现有的驱动配置不适合实时音频应用。在视频播放过程中,有56个丢帧。

DPC延时监控
DPC延时监控
DPC 延迟 YouTube 4K
DPC 延迟 YouTube 4K
DPC延时 高DPC
DPC延时 高DPC
DPC延时监控器驱动程序
DPC延时监控器驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3239 μs * ∼100% -61831%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1059 μs * ∼33% -20149%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
975.4 μs * ∼30% -18550%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
973 μs * ∼30% -18504%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
910 μs * ∼28% -17300%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
370.7 μs * ∼11% -6988%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5.23 μs * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

储存

1TB的SK海力士并没有让人失望,因为它在我们的比较中几乎超过了所有竞争者。只有Zenbook 14 UX435EG中的三星PM981a快了大约25%。在实践中,无论如何,这些差异是无法感知的;你只能通过测量来识别它们。开箱后大约有870GB的容量。

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-20%
20%
-19%
-33%
-11%
-3%
Write 4K
121.6
156.8
29%
211.8
74%
236.2
94%
133.5
10%
131.5
8%
146 ?(116 - 183, n=10)
20%
Read 4K
57.91
39.66
-32%
50.11
-13%
47.53
-18%
39.66
-32%
36.83
-36%
58.9 ?(44.7 - 73.2, n=10)
2%
Write Seq
18545
853.8
-95%
2938
-84%
974.4
-95%
906.71
-95%
1614
-91%
4318 ?(1916 - 18545, n=8)
-77%
Read Seq
2085
2167
4%
2639
27%
1043
-50%
1480.65
-29%
2030
-3%
2131 ?(1991 - 2358, n=8)
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
414
441.1
7%
656.1
58%
603.1
46%
446.2
8%
515.9
25%
464 ?(390 - 525, n=10)
12%
Read 4K Q32T1
401
395.5
-1%
722.5
80%
299.3
-25%
335.15
-16%
419.7
5%
435 ?(346 - 473, n=10)
8%
Write Seq Q32T1
2790
857.5
-69%
3022
8%
974.1
-65%
975.4
-65%
2705
-3%
2832 ?(1390 - 3166, n=10)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3219
3258
1%
3561
11%
1983
-38%
1874
-42%
3390
5%
3523 ?(3219 - 3607, n=10)
9%
AS SSD
-15%
29%
-40%
-50%
-22%
7%
Seq Read
2637
2694.05
2%
2861.17
9%
1610.39
-39%
1608
-39%
2068.46
-22%
2834 ?(2635 - 3133, n=12)
7%
Seq Write
1243
1407.23
13%
2837.42
128%
931.07
-25%
659
-47%
1414.14
14%
1797 ?(1243 - 2969, n=12)
45%
4K Read
54.73
54.44
-1%
60.27
10%
36.18
-34%
51.27
-6%
46.99
-14%
53.5 ?(39.7 - 61.6, n=12)
-2%
4K Write
128.36
195.82
53%
164.18
28%
170.51
33%
151.81
18%
211.94
65%
128 ?(69 - 160, n=12)
0%
4K-64 Read
1011
1091.98
8%
1598.14
58%
457.29
-55%
322.06
-68%
1026.71
2%
1325 ?(1011 - 1891, n=12)
31%
4K-64 Write
1432
1269.15
-11%
1572.1
10%
914.19
-36%
799.71
-44%
977.77
-32%
1900 ?(1342 - 2216, n=12)
33%
Access Time Read *
0.031
0.064
-106%
0.046
-48%
0.092
-197%
0.077
-148%
0.057
-84%
0.0468 ?(0.028 - 0.093, n=12)
-51%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.062
-121%
0.021
25%
0.019
32%
0.046
-64%
0.066
-136%
0.048 ?(0.028 - 0.109, n=12)
-71%
Score Read
1330
1416
6%
1945
46%
655
-51%
534
-60%
1281
-4%
1663 ?(1330 - 2259, n=12)
25%
Score Write
1685
1606
-5%
2020
20%
1178
-30%
1018
-40%
1331
-21%
2208 ?(1638 - 2508, n=12)
31%
Score Total
3637
3692
2%
4966
37%
2144
-41%
1797
-51%
3243
-11%
4676 ?(3615 - 5630, n=12)
29%
Copy ISO MB/s
1781.85
2413.8
1276.99
960.8
1891.4
1913 ?(1277 - 2649, n=7)
Copy Program MB/s
1022.95
574.69
438.41
753.06
604.17
715 ?(373 - 964, n=7)
Copy Game MB/s
1147.89
1407.96
976.56
896.21
1421.91
1382 ?(943 - 1855, n=7)
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -17%
25% / 25%
-30% / -31%
-42% / -43%
-17% / -18%
2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3219 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 401 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 414 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2085 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 18545 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.91 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 121.6 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

MX450安装的(图灵TU117M)是第二个最强大的变体,即N18S-G5,它提供了一个64位的连接和1,395至1,575 MHz以及GDDR6。它的运行功率高达25瓦。尽管如此,制造商避免使用第二个风扇。

  • N18S-G5-B:GBD-128封装,1,395-1,575 MHz,GDDR6 5,001 MHz,28.5 W
  • N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1,395-1,575MHz,GDDR6 5,001MHz,25W
  • N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1,395-1,575MHz,GDDR5 3,501MHz,25W
  • N18S-LP:GB2E-64封装,720-930 MHz,GDDR6 5,001 MHz,12 W

除了GeForce MX450GPU,你还可以得到集成的英特尔Iris Xe 96EUs图形。MX450在合成基准测试中名列前茅,它与Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs相当,或者在某些情况下比它高出近10%。MX450,比Vega 8(ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA)高出约40-50%。

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7
8131 Points ∼100% +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5335 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5274 Points ∼65%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5191 Points ∼64% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4336 - 5573, n=14)
4761 Points ∼59% -10%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4689 Points ∼58% -11%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4571 Points ∼56% -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4371 Points ∼54% -17%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3751 Points ∼46% -29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (313 - 11055, n=110, last 2 years)
3324 Points ∼41% -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i5-1135G7
2982 Points ∼100% +77%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1968 Points ∼66% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (1086 - 2300, n=13)
1713 Points ∼57% +1%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1688 Points ∼57%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1682 Points ∼56% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1566 Points ∼53% -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1382 Points ∼46% -18%
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1128 Points ∼38% -33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (116 - 4721, n=94, last 2 years)
1115 Points ∼37% -34%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4892 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1810 points
Help

游戏性能

在真正的游戏基准测试中,MX450表现适中。在《TheWitcher 3Ultra中,该dGPU的表现低于平均水平。微星Modern 14 B11SB-085 和配备相同dGPU的惠普Envy 13-ba1475ng领先约20%,甚至Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs有时也会快一点(戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED )。

MX450《Far Cry 5》、《Strange Brigade》和《New World》中运行得更好,它甚至比Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs高出50%(Strange Brigade)。我们缺乏在《远征5》中的对比率,但MX450,在这里的表现比它自己的平均水平要好。最近的《新世界》在全高清分辨率和中等细节的情况下还只是可以玩32FPS,但你不能切换到3K。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
53.6 (50min) fps ∼100% +91%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
35 fps ∼65% +25%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 (14.9min, 15.6P0.1, 16P1) fps ∼62% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.7 (30min) fps ∼61% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (21 - 42.8, n=13)
32.7 fps ∼61% +16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32 (29min) fps ∼60% +14%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
30.8 fps ∼57% +10%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
28.1 fps ∼52%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9.3 - 73, n=71, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼46% -12%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
36 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (24 - 41, n=6)
33.3 fps ∼93% -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 (26min) fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7 - 71, n=36, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼60% -40%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
62.2 (48.5min, 50P1) fps ∼100% +39%
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.8 fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (19.2 - 46.7, n=9)
37.9 fps ∼61% -15%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
35.6 (29.8min, 30.9P1) fps ∼57% -21%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
29.7 (10.1min, 11.4P1) fps ∼48% -34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13.3 - 89.4, n=34, last 2 years)
29.5 fps ∼47% -34%
New World - 1920x1080 Medium Video Quality
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
32 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25.9 - 32, n=2)
29 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.5 - 32, n=3, last 2 years)
22.3 fps ∼70% -30%

我们在超级设置(全高清)下看了《Witcher 3》。FPS从18FPS一直跳到26FPS,间隔时间相等,在每个水平上停留了将近2分钟。视频时钟速率和温度在同一周期内同步上升。温度管理显然允许dGPU在温度低于65℃(约149°F)一定时间内从1300MHz跳到1575MHz。而GPU温度的快速上升又导致时钟速率分两阶段下降(1,450,1,250 MHz)。单个风扇和没有分离的热管的热能似乎没有达到最佳工作状态,因为我们很少观察到时钟速度如此突然的增加和减少。

这似乎是一个孤立的案例,因为在新世界(中,全高清)中,热能和视频时钟速率没有显示任何异常的变化。见Logviewer。

TheWitcher 3 Ultra中的Logviewer
TheWitcher 3 Ultra中的Logviewer
新世界中的Logviewer全高清
新世界中的Logviewer全高清

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram