华硕VivoBook 15 KM513笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen和OLED的好处是不会破坏银行的利益

Name: Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS
Brand: Asus

为我们其他人提供OLED。 随着新的VivoBook K系列的推出，华硕旨在以更容易接受的价格带来一些通常在高端ZenBook产品中发现的功能。华硕VivoBook 15 KM513提供AMD Ryzen 5 5500U APU和充满活力的三星OLED HDR面板，起价为62,990美元（846）。虽然这肯定是一个诱人的提议，但VivoBook系列以其闻名的一些问题仍然存在。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/26/2021 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

AMD Lucienne (Zen 2) Laptop / Notebook

华硕VivoBook系列传统上是针对家庭和工作的休闲计算。与VivoBook Pro不同的是，传统的VivoBooks不具备专用图形。然而，最近的 VivoBook 15 K系列的推出带来了一些有趣的前景，包括英特尔和AMD的味道。

VivoBook 15 K系列以可承受的起价带来了OLED的好处，同时还有几个CPU、内存和存储选项。我们的测试单元是VivoBook 15 KM513，采用了AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAPU，配备8GB内存。该设备还配备了256GB NVMe SSD和1TB HDD。华硕目前在印度以62,990英镑（846美元）提供这种配置。

在这篇评论中，我们对华硕VivoBook 15 KM513进行了测试，看看它是否有潜力成为你的下一个中档多媒体笔记本电脑。

看看我们最近的其他华硕VivoBook评论如下。

Test device courtesy of Asus India

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VivoBook 15 KM513 (VivoBook 15 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U 6 x 2.1 - 4 GHz, 40 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Lucienne-U (Zen 2)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, Core: 1800 MHz, Memory: 1600 MHz, Adrenalin 20.40.64

Memory

8 GB

, 4 GB soldered + 4 GB Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE SO-DIMM Timings: 22-22-22-52 at 1600 MHz

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, No, Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 178° Wide-viewing angle, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, 256 GB

, Secondary HDD: Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172: 931 GB free, 199 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt/Raphael - HD Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 1, Card Reader: microSD card reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.6 x 359.8 x 235.3

Battery

42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3S1P, 3-cell, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8.5 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: Harman/Kardon-tuned stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet keyboard with 1.4 mm key travel, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.8 kg

Price

715 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.5 %	11/2021	Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.8 kg	18.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
76.9 %	09/2021	HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
83.5 %	08/2021	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.7 kg	19.1 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.6 %	11/2021	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 %		Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA R7 5700U, Vega 8	1.8 kg	16.1 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
88.5 %	06/2021	Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S R7 5800U, Vega 8	1.2 kg	13.9 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
82.9 %		Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 R5 4500U, Vega 6	1.8 kg	21.7 mm	16.00"	1920x1080
81.2 %	04/2021	Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.8 kg	17.94 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳。坚固的塑料，有一些弯曲

机箱结构是华硕ZenBook和VivoBook系列的主要区别之一。与大多数VivoBooks一样，VivoBook 15 KM513也是以塑料结构为主的。因此，在键盘甲板区域有一定程度的弯曲是可以预期的。也就是说，这种弯曲只有在过度的压力下才会明显，所以在日常使用中应该不会有任何影响。

盖子可以用一个手指打开，有一个铝合金的表面和一个浮雕的 "华硕VivoBook "品牌，给它带来一些档次。铰链足够紧密，在正常使用中几乎看不出显示屏的晃动，除非故意摇晃。

虽然整体结构不错，但由于没有涉及到专用的GPU，1.8公斤的重量对于2021年末的设备来说感觉有点偏高。

Size Comparison

Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F HP 14s-fq1357ng Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S DIN A4 ❌

连接性。残缺的USB-C型

在典型的VivoBook时尚中，华硕为VivoBook 15 KM513赋予了一个体面的端口选择，但也有一些不足之处。

在左边，我们有两个USB 2.0 Type-A。在右边，我们可以看到一个USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A和USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C端口，一个HDMI 1.4输出，一个3.5毫米组合音频插孔，以及一个microSD卡插槽。

不幸的是，USB-C端口不支持DisplayPort-out和Power Delivery，这意味着你不能使用你现有的USB-C 65 W适配器为笔记本电脑充电。

此外，HDMI 1.4输出只适合1080p60输出。4K输出是可能的，但在8位色彩下只限于30帧。

右边：microSD读卡器，3.5毫米组合音频插孔，USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C，USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A，HDMI 1.4输出，DC输入

SD卡阅读器

内置的microSD读卡器肯定比同级别的其他笔记本电脑要慢。也就是说，各种文件的复制与这个价格段的竞争对手持平或更好，而连续读取则有些偏低。

当完全插入时，microSD卡几乎与机箱平齐。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s +169%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	35 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	34.7 (32.97^min - 34.77^max) MB/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	34 MB/s -2%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ (AV Pro V60)	33.4 MB/s -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.2 MB/s -19%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	21.32 MB/s -39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)	122.6 MB/s +261%
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	37.3 MB/s +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	36.9 MB/s +9%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ (AV Pro V60)	36.7 MB/s +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36.5 MB/s +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	33.96 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.59 MB/s -16%

沟通

在我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试中，我们能够接近或超过1.5Gbps的吞吐量（发送和接收），参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120路由器在距离笔记本电脑1米的直接视线范围内。

Wi-Fi性能是一致的，没有太多的节流现象。它甚至比英特尔的变种好，即 VivoBook 15 K513EQ它的特点是英特尔Wi-Fi AX201芯片组。

虽然AX200卡支持蓝牙5.2，但华硕在VivoBook 15 KM513中只提供蓝牙5.0。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1433 (1388^min - 1510^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1138 (844^min - 1286^max) MBit/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1112 (914^min - 1232^max) MBit/s -22%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	890 (431^min - 988^max) MBit/s -38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	676 (338^min - 691^max) MBit/s -53%
Average of class Multimedia (285 - 998, n=2, last 2 years)	642 MBit/s -55%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	604 (417^min - 698^max) MBit/s -58%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	287 (152^min - 308^max) MBit/s -80%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1558 (792^min - 1588^max) MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1364 (761^min - 1472^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (1017 - 1675, n=2, last 2 years)	1346 MBit/s -14%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1285 (1029^min - 1399^max) MBit/s -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1276 (1239^min - 1312^max) MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	621 (506^min - 708^max) MBit/s -60%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	593 (296^min - 599^max) MBit/s -62%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	296 (271^min - 305^max) MBit/s -81%

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (792-1588)

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1285 (1029-1399)

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (1388-1510)

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø604 (417-698)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头是我们在绝大多数笔记本电脑上发现的标准的720p费用。由于颜色偏差大，可感知的纹理和清晰度降低，只要有足够的环境照明，它就足以满足偶尔的视频通话。

没有用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头。也没有物理隐私快门，但网络摄像头可以通过按Fn+F10切换开/关。

ColorChecker Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS: 13.49 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.35 ∆E

安全问题

华硕为VivoBook 15 KM513配备了一个嵌入触摸板的指纹传感器。指纹传感器很容易设置，而且一般能快速识别指纹。

有一个专门的TPM 2.0模块。这款笔记本电脑已经为Windows 11做好准备，事实上，在我们测试期间，已经通过Windows Update提供下载。

辅料

除了65瓦的充电器和通常的文书工作外，盒子里没有其他附件。

维护

没有专门的维修舱口。底部面板可以通过卸下10颗Torx螺钉来撬开，露出内部结构。

WLAN卡、NVMe固态硬盘和2.5英寸SATA硬盘都是可以更换的。内存可以扩展到16GB的DDR4-3200内存；根据配置，最多有8GB的内存被焊接在电路板上。

担保

在印度，华硕为VivoBook 15 KM513提供了一年的标准保修。买家可以进一步延长保修期，增加一年（99英镑）或两年（999英镑）。此外，一年的本地意外损坏保护也可以利用₹499。

输入设备。体面的键盘，但触摸板很拥挤

键盘

键盘是标准的VivoBook类型，并没有带来任何比迄今为止在这个系列中所看到的更少的功能。1.4毫米的键程很好，但触感有些模糊。此外，那些习惯于没有数字键盘的中央键盘的人可能需要一些时间来适应这种布局。回车键是VivoBook标志性的黄色色块。

有一个三段式背光。然而，我们拥有的透明银色选项提供了黑色字体的按键。这使得在低背光水平下查看按键有些困难，特别是在有一些环境光的情况下。

触摸板

VivoBook 15 KM513的尺寸约为7.2毫米×10.5毫米，与我们看到的竞争对手相比，它的触摸板面积有些狭窄。也就是说，表面滑行起来很流畅，完全支持WindowsPrecision 手势。整个表面就像一个鼠标按钮，点击它是相当容易的，尽管有些人可能不喜欢这种浅浅的点击和低触感。

触摸板上没有花哨的ScreenPad功能，这在一些触摸板中没有像一些VivoBook S15模型中看到的那样。

显示屏。三星OLED面板，具有直流调光和HDR功能

我们的测试装置配备了15.6英寸1080p的三星ATNA56YX03-0 OLED面板。我们以前在其他几款VivoBook笔记本电脑中见过这种面板，包括 VivoBook 15 Pro和 VivoBook 15 K513EQ.如下图所示，这款三星面板具有出色的色彩和亮度特性，没有背光渗漏。

华硕表示，VivoBook 15 KM513的面板经过VESA DisplayHDR 600 True Black认证，峰值亮度为600尼特。

在我们的测试中，我们发现该显示器在SDR模式下提供高达407尼特的亮度分布，达到98%。在HDR模式下，我们记录的峰值亮度接近545尼特，白色图像达到100%。


404 cd/m²	399 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
403 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	403 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	405 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung ATNA56YX03-0 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 402.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 401 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.13
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3)

	Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Samsung (SDC4158), OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F LG Philips 156WFF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-51%	1%	1%	-22%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9		99.9 0%	99.9 0%	67.4 -33%
sRGB Coverage	100	59 -41%	100 0%	100 0%	97.2 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	96.7	38 -61%	99.9 3%	99.7 3%	68.7 -29%
Response Times		-1919%	-58%	-141%	-3623%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.89 ?(0.86, 0.03)	29 ?(13, 16) -3158%	2.2 ?(1.1, 1.1) -147%	4 ?(2.4, 1.6) -349%	52.4 ?(29.2, 23.2) -5788%
Response Time Black / White *	2.31 ?(1.39, 0.92)	18 ?(9, 9) -679%	2.9 ?(1.1, 1.8) -26%	4 ?(2, 2) -73%	36 ?(22.8, 13.2) -1458%
PWM Frequency	60 ?(100)		59.5 ?(100) -1%	60 ?(100) 0%
Screen		-71%	10%	-13%	-23%
Brightness middle	401	376 -6%	384.5 -4%	370 -8%	289.8 -28%
Brightness	403	341 -15%	388 -4%	378 -6%	274 -32%
Brightness Distribution	98	78 -20%	98 0%	96 -2%	92 -6%
Black Level *		0.66		0.05	0.31
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.24	6.4 -98%	2.53 22%	4.33 -34%	3.75 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.42	20.45 -219%	6.16 4%	7.04 -10%	7.01 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.13			4.14 -94%	1.52 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	4.59 -70%	1.6 41%	0.92 66%	5.3 -96%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.26 ^97%	2.24 ^98%	2.38 ^92%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6374 ^102%	6819 ^95%	6464 ^101%	6394 ^102%	5810 ^112%
Contrast		570		7400	935
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		38		89.4	62.9
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		59		100	97
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-680% / -437%	-16% / -9%	-51% / -39%	-1223% / -622%

* ... smaller is better

MyAsus应用程序提供了几个选项，如自动屏幕保护程序和像素移动模式，同时显示静态图像，以防止损坏OLED面板。像素移动在正常使用中几乎不可见，如果需要，可以停用。

华硕没有提供在MyAsus应用程序中切换色彩空间的方法。然而，华硕Splendid选项，如正常、鲜艳、手动和护眼，都是可用的。因此，我们在正常模式下针对默认的DCI-P3标准进行了所有色彩测量和校准。

VivoBook 15 KM513的显示屏在色域方面取得了全垒打的成绩，在sRGB和DCI-P3的覆盖率为100%，在AdobeRGB的覆盖率为96.7%。这意味着这块面板不仅非常适合各种多媒体消费，而且也非常适合专业的照片和视频编辑工作流程。

色彩准确度在开箱后还算不错，灰度的平均Delta E为2.7，ColorChecker为3.24。根据DCI-P3对显示器进行校准后，灰度的Delta E为0.7，ColorChecker为2.13，有了明显的改善。与红色和绿色相比，显示器在蓝色方面的偏差似乎更大。

正如大多数OLED面板的特点一样，我们在VivoBook 15 KM513上记录了非常低的响应时间，特别是在50%的灰色到80%的灰色转换中。

华硕使用直流调光来调整背光灯的强度。60赫兹的直流调光在50%至100%的亮度范围内是有效的。在49%和以下，PWM启动，频率约为490.63 Hz。

这两个频率都相当低，所以对PWM敏感的用户在长时间使用屏幕时应该谨慎。

欲了解更多信息，请查看我们的文章，"为什么脉宽调制（PWM）是一个令人头痛的问题"和"分析。直流调光与PWM--你能在没有闪烁的情况下调光AMOLED显示器吗？".你也可以在我们专门的 "PWM排名表 "中获得所有被评测设备的PWM测量概况。 PWM排名表.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.39 ms rise
2.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.92 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.86 ms rise
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.03 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

VivoBook K15的光面屏幕在阳光直射下观看时确实带来了一些不便，需要使用高亮度水平。该面板提供178°宽的视角，但像许多OLED一样，它受到颜色偏移的影响，从极端角度看时，会出现绿色的色调。

性能。Ryzen 5具有良好的持续多核性能

我们的华硕VivoBook 15 KM513是由 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U与集成 Radeon RX Vega 7图形。买家可以选择一个 Ryzen 7 5700U华硕为我们的审查样本提供了总共8GB的双通道DDR4-3200内存，其中4GB焊接在主板上，另外4GB通过三星SO-DIMM。

MyAsus应用程序提供了三种华硕智能性能技术（AIPT）模式供用户选择：平衡、性能和低语。虽然PL2在所有模式下都保持40W不变，但PL0，也称为皮肤温度感知电源管理（STAPM），和PL1的变化如下。

AIPT模式	PL0 / STAPM限制(W)	PL1限制(W)	PL2限制(W)
低音	15	25	40
平衡模式	20	25	40
性能	28	35	40

我们在平衡模式下运行所有的基准测试，因为这是默认的，最适合大多数的使用情况。我们在适当的地方显示了平衡模式和性能模式之间的性能差异。有趣的是，我们注意到性能模式偏重于CPU性能，而牺牲了GPU的得分。

处理器

VivoBook 15 KM513中的AMD Ryzen 5 5500U提供良好的持续性能

VivoBook 15 KM513中的AMD Ryzen 5 5500U提供6个内核和12个线程，基本时钟为2.1GHz，提升到4GHz。我们发现，在我们的Cinebench R15多循环测试中，这个AMD APU提供了非常好的持续性能。

尽管平衡模式提供了体面的持续多核性能，只有在第五轮之后才会出现轻微的下滑，但用户可以在性能模式下获得11%的分数增长，甚至更好的持续性能。

我们观察到，性能模式总体上有利于多核测试，根据工作负载的不同，总体效益可以在2%到14%之间。

总的来说，VivoBook 15的CPU性能与其他采用相同APU的笔记本相当，甚至可以与英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U; Performance: Ø1182 (1166.66-1226.69)

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U; Balanced: Ø1051 (1030.98-1103.84)

HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø996 (940.2-1110.59)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1208 (1173.12-1266.74)

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø851 (831.5-866.44)

Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: Ø1437 (1387.54-1534.27)

Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1209 (1163.3-1526.78)

Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U: Ø906 (866.27-966.32)

Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø815 (792.91-822.98)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	86.2 pt
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	63.5 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	59.5 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ ^-2! Intel Core i7-1165G7	51 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	49.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	49.3 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	49.1 pt
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	46.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F ^-1! Intel Core i5-1135G7	45.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	44.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14189 Points +98%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	9051 Points +27%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	8154 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6030 - 8565, n=19)	7280 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7221 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	7151 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	6496 Points -9%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	6394 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	5920 (5646.52^min - 5919.93^max) Points -17%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	5609 (5443.41^min - 5609.45^max) Points -22%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	5504 (5079.81^min - 5504.22^max) Points -23%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1713 Points +45%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	1480 Points +26%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1427 Points +21%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1264 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	1179 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	1173 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1149 - 1183, n=18)	1173 Points -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1167 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	1152 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1149 Points -3%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5352 Points +95%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	3536 Points +29%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	3303 Points +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (2223 - 3316, n=20)	2784 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2758 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	2738 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	2517 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	2440 Points -11%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2223 Points -19%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	2182 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	2067 Points -25%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	646 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	565 Points +24%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	555 Points +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	522 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	490 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	457 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	454 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (449 - 461, n=19)	457 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	456 Points 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	452 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	451 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points +89%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1535 Points +25%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1522 Points +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1267 (1173.12^min - 1266.74^max) Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	1227 (1166.66^min - 1226.69^max) Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	1104 (1030.98^min - 1103.84^max) Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (995 - 1412, n=20)	1223 Points 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1112 (946.23^min - 1112.47^max) Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	966 (866.27^min - 966.32^max) Points -21%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	866 (831.5^min - 866.44^max) Points -29%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	823 (792.91^min - 822.98^max) Points -33%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points +42%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	227 Points +28%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	225 Points +27%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	201 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	188 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	177 Points 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	177 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	177 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	177 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	176 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (170 - 179, n=18)	176 Points -1%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	567 Seconds * -25%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	542 Seconds * -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	533 Seconds * -18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	490 Seconds * -8%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	453.5 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	407.2 Seconds * +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (358 - 490, n=18)	419 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	418 Seconds * +8%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	372.7 Seconds * +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	323 Seconds * +29%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	265 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57411 MIPS +69%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	42760 MIPS +26%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	41574 MIPS +23%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	33890 MIPS
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	32335 MIPS -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	33768 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (29585 - 36896, n=18)	33723 MIPS 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	31060 MIPS -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	25891 MIPS -24%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	25242 MIPS -26%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	23708 MIPS -30%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5639 MIPS +30%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	5359 MIPS +23%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	5308 MIPS +22%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	4794 MIPS +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	4588 MIPS +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	4352 MIPS
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	4331 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4323 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4321 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4174 - 4378, n=19)	4304 MIPS -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4268 MIPS -2%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11372 Points +110%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	7026 Points +30%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	6254 Points +16%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5523 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	5409 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	5268 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5367 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4063 - 5917, n=20)	5231 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4747 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	4640 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1758 Points +57%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1450 Points +29%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	1419 Points +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1191 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	1123 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	1122 Points 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1119 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1116 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	1104 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1070 - 1126, n=20)	1104 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.6 fps +78%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	10.6 fps +21%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	10.2 fps +17%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	8.75 fps
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	7.69 fps -12%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6.7 - 9.74, n=20)	8.49 fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	8.24 fps -6%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.27 fps -17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7.23 fps -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	7.16 fps -18%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.88 fps -21%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	67.3 s * -6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	67.3 s * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (60 - 80.7, n=17)	66.1 s * -4%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	63.3 s *
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	58.8 s * +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	57.2 s * +10%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	54.8 s * +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	50 s * +21%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	48 s * +24%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	46.9 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.635 sec * -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	0.634 sec * -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (0.607 - 0.67, n=19)	0.631 sec * -0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Balanced)	0.628 sec *
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (Performance)	0.617 sec * +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.626 sec * -0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.622 sec * +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	0.585 sec * +7%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.563 sec * +10%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	0.544 sec * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4811 sec * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1227 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

67.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177 Points

Help

... in comparison

下图说明了在Cinebench R15循环过程中，三种性能模式之间的时钟、温度和功率的比较差异。从下面的图表中可以看出，Whisper模式只需要10W的功率，只有从1.9GHz到3.5GHz以上的间歇性、短暂的时钟峰值，这导致相当低的封装温度为62℃，最高为70℃。

平衡模式将功率限制提高到25W，这使得Ryzen 5 5500U可以在更高的3GHz时钟下运行，并罕见地提升到3.8GHz。这种情况下的核心温度徘徊在90℃左右。

性能模式将功率封套略微提高到30W，与平衡模式相比，它提供了稍高的3.2GHz时钟，偶尔会提升到3.9GHz。这导致核心温度在每个循环过程中接近95℃，而在休息期间下降到78℃。

因此，平衡模式应该足以满足大多数使用情况。那些需要运行CPU密集型应用程序的用户最好使用性能模式，其副作用是排放量较高。

在可用的AIPT模式下进行Cinebench R15循环时，CPU的时钟、温度和封装功率。(红色--性能，绿色--平衡，蓝色--低语)

Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	97 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	83.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	67.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	67.2 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	62.1 pt
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	60.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	58.9 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	57 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)	12788 KRay/s +60%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	11097 KRay/s +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (7222 - 10680, n=18)	8931 KRay/s +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	8628 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	8612 KRay/s +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	7994 KRay/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	7628 KRay/s -5%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	7197 KRay/s -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)	65480 Points +46%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	62186 Points +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (41815 - 58107, n=18)	49490 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	49306 Points +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	47941 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	44706 Points
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41815 Points -6%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	30646 Points -31%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)	3047 MB/s +111%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	2076 MB/s +44%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	2039 MB/s +41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	1670 MB/s +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1354 - 1907, n=18)	1639 MB/s +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	1445 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	1442 MB/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	1354 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	92131 Points +31%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)	92085 Points +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	72332 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (68235 - 74033, n=18)	72280 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	70197 Points
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	68309 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	50250 Points -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	43496 Points -38%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	12997 Points +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	10108 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (9007 - 10446, n=18)	10035 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	9382 Points
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)	9055 Points -3%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	9007 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	6691 Points -29%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	4790 Points -49%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)	33558 Points +44%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	32615 Points +40%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (21894 - 30659, n=18)	26247 Points +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	26138 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	25846 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	23375 Points
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	21894 Points -6%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	18672 Points -20%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)	76070 MB/s +72%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	73387 MB/s +65%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	61705 MB/s +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	50257 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (31792 - 54455, n=18)	48011 MB/s +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	46236 MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	44346 MB/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41342 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)	868 MB/s +76%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	681 MB/s +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	565 MB/s +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (234 - 614, n=18)	537 MB/s +9%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	492 MB/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	478 MB/s -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	404 MB/s -18%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	391 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)	6829 KRay/s +57%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	6088 KRay/s +40%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (3943 - 5717, n=18)	4844 KRay/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	4703 KRay/s +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	4466 KRay/s +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	4352 KRay/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	4183 KRay/s -4%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	3902 KRay/s -10%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)	36824 MPixel/s +118%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	21625 MPixel/s +28%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	19463 MPixel/s +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	19067 MPixel/s +13%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	16888 MPixel/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	16576 MPixel/s -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	16149 MPixel/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (7765 - 22932, n=18)	15767 MPixel/s -7%

查看我们专门的 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U页面了解更多信息和基准测试。

系统性能

与其他Ryzen 5 5500U笔记本电脑相比，PCMark 10的性能没有出现任何惊喜，也与Ryzen 7 5700U相当。该系统在日常使用中反应相当灵敏，在Edge中打开大量标签或观看4K YouTube视频时，我们没有发现什么问题。

AIDA64内存测试结果与基于Ryzen 5 5500U的典型系统的预期一致。我们建议根据要求和可行性，为设备配备更大的内存容量。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points +29%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	5890 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	5402 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	5218 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	5121 Points
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5120 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4626 - 5301, n=13)	5059 Points -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4809 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	4784 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	4524 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9917 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9551 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	9524 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	9270 Points +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	9242 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	9182 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	9125 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8390 - 9789, n=13)	9112 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	8905 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9410 Points +24%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8721 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	8111 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	7942 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	7579 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6262 - 7958, n=13)	7478 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	7096 Points -6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	6622 Points -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	6251 Points -18%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points +66%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	5945 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	5691 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	5320 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	5239 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4513 - 5540, n=13)	5171 Points -1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4934 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	4704 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4373 Points -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	4222 Points -19%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4476 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5321 points
PCMark 10 Score		5121 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)	61455 MB/s +76%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	39127 MB/s +12%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	35627 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	34927 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	34718 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	34196 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (19083 - 40547, n=18)	31948 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	27294 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)	60555 MB/s +41%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	47024 MB/s +10%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	43983 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	43584 MB/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	42872 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	42816 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (23005 - 47024, n=18)	38947 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	32558 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)	63628 MB/s +64%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	43873 MB/s +13%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	41223 MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	39295 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	38867 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (20150 - 42337, n=18)	33552 MB/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	31943 MB/s -18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	31041 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)	102.3 ns * -7%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	99.9 ns * -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	99.4 ns * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (87.3 - 119, n=18)	98.3 ns * -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, Vega 8	96.1 ns * -0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7	96 ns *
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, Vega 6	94 ns * +2%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350	84.5 ns * +12%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在打开我们网站的多个标签并在YouTube上播放我们的4K视频样本后，我们测得845.10微秒的最高中断到处理延迟。YouTube上的4K播放很流畅，几乎没有丢帧。

然而，在混合中加入Prime95原地大型FFTs压力10秒后，延迟测量值增加到1079.80微秒，表明用户在实时音频和视频编辑工作流程中可能会遇到障碍。Windows内核执行程序（ntoskrnl.exe）似乎是导致延迟增加的原因。

请查看我们专门的 DPC延时排名页面了解更多的延迟比较。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4888 μs * -353%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2489 μs * -130%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1857 μs * -72%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	1080 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	874 μs * +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	853 μs * +21%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	587 μs * +46%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	395.4 μs * +63%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的设备配备了Western Digital PC SN530 256 GB NVMe SSD和1TB希捷5400 RPM SATA HDD。如果需要的话，可以将硬盘换成2.5英寸的固态硬盘。

读取速度在预期范围内，但写入速度似乎受到了影响，特别是在较低的队列深度。考虑到AS SSD和DiskSpd的累积分数，我们单位的NVMe SSD总体上与其他笔记本电脑的相同驱动器的平均评级相当。

更高容量的西部数据SN530硬盘可以提供显著的性能优势。我们观察到，在队列深度为8的情况下连续运行DiskSpd读取循环时，没有任何节流现象。

更多存储性能的比较可以在我们的 SSD和HDD基准测试页中找到更多的存储性能比较。

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	94.6 pt
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	78.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	74.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	62.4 pt
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	54.6 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	44.7 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	44.2 pt
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	42.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	36.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	23.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s +80%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2076 (2064.65^min - 2075.93^max) MB/s +30%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1821 (1812.78^min - 1820.54^max) MB/s +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1684 (1321.21^min - 1684.01^max) MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	1600 (1586.91^min - 1599.92^max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (1215 - 1793, n=6)	1557 MB/s -3%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1527 (1517.61^min - 1527.15^max) MB/s -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1458 (1429^min - 1457.96^max) MB/s -9%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1391 (1369.23^min - 1391.19^max) MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	500 (497.23^min - 500.17^max) MB/s -69%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s +210%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2359 (2323.61^min - 2359.19^max) MB/s +146%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1939 (1916.53^min - 1939.03^max) MB/s +102%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1498 (987.97^min - 1497.52^max) MB/s +56%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1297 (927.18^min - 1297.09^max) MB/s +35%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (942 - 1788, n=6)	1094 MB/s +14%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1058 (1034.94^min - 1058.01^max) MB/s +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	960 (959.66^min - 960.29^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	897 (879.46^min - 896.63^max) MB/s -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	451 (442.92^min - 450.89^max) MB/s -53%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)	5217 MB/s +111%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3607 (3276.17^min - 3606.89^max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	2659 (2544.63^min - 2659.19^max) MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	2467 (2257.58^min - 2466.67^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	2462 (2341.89^min - 2461.64^max) MB/s 0%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (2223 - 2492, n=6)	2439 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	2297 (2049.22^min - 2296.8^max) MB/s -7%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1909 (1605.3^min - 1908.62^max) MB/s -23%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1576 (1400.27^min - 1576.42^max) MB/s -36%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	551 (460.2^min - 550.55^max) MB/s -78%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s +310%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2955 (2654.16^min - 2955.1^max) MB/s +207%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1967 (1958.53^min - 1966.92^max) MB/s +104%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1603 (1311.14^min - 1603.48^max) MB/s +66%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1434 (780.77^min - 1434.1^max) MB/s +49%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1137 (1124.34^min - 1137.08^max) MB/s +18%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (959 - 1831, n=6)	1108 MB/s +15%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	964 (961.3^min - 964.44^max) MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	963 (959.06^min - 962.8^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	502 (501.64^min - 502.27^max) MB/s -48%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s +82%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	63.9 (62.84^min - 63.93^max) MB/s +80%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	60.2 (60.01^min - 60.16^max) MB/s +70%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	54.9 (54.55^min - 54.85^max) MB/s +55%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	51.1 (45.49^min - 51.05^max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	46 (45.57^min - 46.04^max) MB/s +30%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	40.2 (39.26^min - 40.24^max) MB/s +13%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (25.5 - 47.8, n=6)	36.6 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	35.5 (34.08^min - 35.5^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	34.3 (34.23^min - 34.28^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	200 (53.88^min - 200.47^max) MB/s +100%
Average of class Multimedia (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)	178.7 MB/s +79%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	148 (142.91^min - 147.87^max) MB/s +48%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	142 (139.45^min - 142.06^max) MB/s +42%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	135 (133.49^min - 135.4^max) MB/s +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	128 (127.16^min - 128.1^max) MB/s +28%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (44.4 - 190, n=6)	122.6 MB/s +23%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	99.9 (99.22^min - 99.93^max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	94.8 (76.99^min - 94.75^max) MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	61.2 (59.86^min - 61.16^max) MB/s -39%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1455 (1440.14^min - 1455.31^max) MB/s +108%
Average of class Multimedia (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)	1350 MB/s +93%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1120 (1057.46^min - 1120.06^max) MB/s +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1068 (1065.87^min - 1067.86^max) MB/s +53%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (391 - 1312, n=6)	728 MB/s +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	704 (686.03^min - 703.98^max) MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	698 (696.16^min - 698.26^max) MB/s
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	649 (645.63^min - 648.52^max) MB/s -7%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	345 (344.78^min - 345.19^max) MB/s -51%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	283 (281.07^min - 282.84^max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1625 (1621.37^min - 1625.26^max) MB/s +172%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1174 (961.12^min - 1174.48^max) MB/s +96%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)	1067 MB/s +78%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	598 (301.66^min - 598.4^max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (217 - 1277, n=6)	578 MB/s -3%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	503 (493.05^min - 503.32^max) MB/s -16%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	452 (438.46^min - 452.17^max) MB/s -24%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	389 (380.92^min - 388.74^max) MB/s -35%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	385 (364.45^min - 385.39^max) MB/s -36%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	261 (260.82^min - 261.24^max) MB/s -56%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)	5067 Points +205%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4451 Points +168%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	3845 Points +132%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	3398 Points +105%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2469 Points +49%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1754 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1714 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	1659 Points
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (1209 - 2212, n=6)	1529 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	553 Points -67%
Score Read
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)	1695 Points +122%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1383 Points +81%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1359 Points +78%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1292 Points +69%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	980 Points +28%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	819 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	765 Points
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (622 - 1009, n=6)	747 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	515 Points -33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	230 Points -70%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)	2567 Points +364%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2452 Points +343%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1898 Points +243%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1351 Points +144%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1263 Points +128%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	993 Points +80%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	553 Points
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (330 - 704, n=6)	450 Points -19%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	283 Points -49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	202 Points -63%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)	4005 MB/s +86%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2916 MB/s +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	2549 MB/s +18%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	2155 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	2082 MB/s -3%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (1796 - 2159, n=6)	2000 MB/s -7%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1784 MB/s -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1470 MB/s -32%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1402 MB/s -35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	458.9 MB/s -79%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s +174%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1844 MB/s +98%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1571 MB/s +69%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1566 MB/s +68%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	931 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (358 - 1753, n=6)	837 MB/s -10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	742 MB/s -20%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	643 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	338.1 MB/s -64%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	324.2 MB/s -65%
4K Read
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s +57%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	58.3 MB/s +46%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	56 MB/s +40%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	52.4 MB/s +31%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	44.33 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	41.92 MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	39.89 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	37.25 MB/s -7%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (22.3 - 39.9, n=6)	33.9 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	24.8 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)	188.5 MB/s +37%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	159.8 MB/s +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	157.5 MB/s +15%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	141.9 MB/s +3%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	140.8 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	137.2 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (51.3 - 195.5, n=6)	124 MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	110.3 MB/s -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	98 MB/s -29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	39.48 MB/s -71%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)	1231 MB/s +142%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1086 MB/s +113%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1039 MB/s +104%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1011 MB/s +99%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	796 MB/s +56%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	582 MB/s +14%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (391 - 762, n=6)	513 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	509 MB/s
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	322.3 MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	159.1 MB/s -69%
4K-64 Write
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2136 MB/s +561%
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s +557%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	1556 MB/s +382%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	1083 MB/s +235%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	1047 MB/s +224%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	788 MB/s +144%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	323.1 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (103.9 - 395, n=6)	243 MB/s -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	152.6 MB/s -53%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	129.1 MB/s -60%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	0.146 ms * -19%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (0.072 - 0.284, n=6)	0.138 ms * -12%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	0.123 ms *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	0.119 ms * +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	0.089 ms * +28%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.072 ms * +41%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)	0.0578 ms * +53%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.052 ms * +58%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	0.05 ms * +59%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.028 ms * +77%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	0.577 ms * -1031%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.135 ms * -165%
Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G (0.051 - 0.189, n=6)	0.1202 ms * -136%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07	0.066 ms * -29%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	0.065 ms * -27%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)	0.05992 ms * -17%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	0.051 ms *
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	0.046 ms * +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05	0.034 ms * +33%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.028 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2482 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 976 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 479.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 349.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1461 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 979 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 36.65 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 98.7 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 454.4 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 587 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS: Ø2475 (2329.1-2478.83)

GPU性能

在3DMark等合成基准测试中，该GPU的性能符合预期，并与使用相同APU的联想IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 发布的分数持平。我们看到，在3DMark中，Radeon RX Vega 7比Iris Xe Graphics G7 80 EUs ，在戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一，有大约7%的整体优势。

有趣的是，我们看到VivoBook 15 KM513在整个3DMark测试中也比VivoBook S15 D533UA 快10%，后者采用Radeon RX Vega 8 。

在电池上，我们观察到3DMarkTime Spy 总分和GPU分数减少了约8%，测试的CPU部分则明显减少了31%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	33.1 pt
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	32 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	28.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	28.7 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	27 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	26.7 pt
HP 14s-fq1357ng ^-1! AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	24.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA ^-1! AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	24.7 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	22.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points +260%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6293 Points +20%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	5870 Points +12%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5731 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	5667 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5431 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5257 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5253 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (3353 - 6249, n=58)	5054 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4210 Points -20%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 150699, n=60, last 2 years)	58293 Points +133%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	28491 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	25036 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	24916 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	24343 Points -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (13713 - 31437, n=43)	23324 Points -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	20755 Points -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	20611 Points -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points +316%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	4496 Points +34%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	3861 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	3430 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3395 Points +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3383 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3365 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3195 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1772 - 4037, n=62)	3189 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	2656 Points -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points +394%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1333 Points +24%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U	1082 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1075 Points
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1064 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1059 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1057 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U	1040 Points -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (496 - 1249, n=57)	991 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	783 Points -27%

3DMark 11 Performance		5409 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		100387 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18472 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3074 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1369 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1218 points
Help

... in comparison

在各种AIPT模式之间的转换确实对3DMarkTime Spy 和Fire Strike 得分产生了可感知的影响。以Balanced profile为参考，我们看到Whisper模式导致Time Spy 总分中大约20%的性能下降。在性能模式下，Time Spy 图形的得分减少了5%，而在Time Spy CPU上的差异则在误差范围之内。

在Fire Strike ，我们再次看到Whisper模式在测试的图形部分造成了高达15%的损失，而CPU的分数则下降了27%。虽然性能模式在图形方面没有任何明显的区别，但它在Fire Strike 物理学方面提供了轻微的5%的优势，这在很大程度上是对CPU的依赖。

因此，越来越明显的是，改变AIPT模式的最大影响是在CPU方面，而不是iGPU。用户可以根据自己的工作流程要求，选择所需的AIPT模式。

3DMark测试	Whisper	Balanced	Performance
Time Spy Score	965 (-20%)	1218	1148 (-5%)
Time Spy 图形	853 (-20%)	1075	1012 (-5%)
Time Spy cpu	3809 (-23%)	5001	4909 (-1.84%)
Fire Strike 分数	2513 (-18%)	3074	3016 (-1.89%)
Fire Strike 图形	2855 (-15.15%)	3365	3341 (-0.71%)
Fire Strike 物理	11604 (-27%)	15913	16738 (+5.18%)

游戏性能

VivoBook 15 KM513并不是一台游戏笔记本电脑。集成的Radeon RX Vega 7 iGPU只适合于在低设置下玩旧游戏。可以注意到，AMD卡不再支持1366x768这样的分辨率。iGPU的性能与其他搭载Ryzen 5 5500U的设备相当，而且明显好于戴尔Inspiron 15 7506二合一中的Iris Xe Graphics G7 80 EUs。

The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=64, last 2 years)	205 fps +247%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	86 (81^min) fps +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	66.1 (60^min) fps +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	59.4 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	59.1 (52^min, 52^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (25.5 - 105.8, n=50)	58.1 fps -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	54 (32.2^min, 32.6^P0.1, 38^P1) fps -9%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	52 fps -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	41.9 (32^min) fps -29%
1920x1080 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (24.5 - 231, n=11, last 2 years)	100.8 fps +358%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (22 - 27.6, n=4)	24.6 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	22 (19^min, 19.59^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years)	93.9 fps +416%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	29.9 (27^min) fps +64%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	19.8 (18^min) fps +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	19.6 (15^min, 15.3^P0.1, 16.1^P1) fps +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	18.5 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	18.2 (15^min, 15^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8.96 - 26.2, n=49)	18.1 fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	15.7 (13^min) fps -14%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	14.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +292%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	16.7 (14^min) fps +29%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	13.4 (8.64^min, 9.14^P0.1, 10.9^P1) fps +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	12.9 fps 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	12.9 (11^min, 11^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6.5 - 15.8, n=42)	11.9 fps -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	10 (8^min) fps -22%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	10 fps -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	9.68 (8^min) fps -25%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 211, n=73, last 2 years)	99.5 fps +208%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	48.6 fps +50%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	34.9 fps +8%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	34.8 fps +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	33.5 fps +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	32.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (17.1 - 41.1, n=40)	30.4 fps -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	29.2 fps -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	25.4 (19^min) fps -21%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Multimedia (9.75 - 162.4, n=84, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +305%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	23 fps +42%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	17.4 fps +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	17.3 fps +7%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	16.9 fps +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	16.2 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8.9 - 20.3, n=40)	15.4 fps -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	15 fps -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	12.3 (9^min) fps -24%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +356%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	14.5 fps +31%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	11.7 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	11.6 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	11.1 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	10.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (5.85 - 14.3, n=37)	10.5 fps -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	4.82 fps -57%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average of class Multimedia (37.2 - 215, n=87, last 2 years)	140.8 fps +49%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	126 (109.8^min) fps +33%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	111.1 (95.5^min) fps +17%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (32.9 - 137.7, n=58)	99 fps +4%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	98.7 (85.1^min) fps +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	98.2 (85.7^min) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	97 (84.9^min) fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	94.8 (82.3^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	90.1 (79.3^min) fps -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	78.2 (50.6^min) fps -18%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average of class Multimedia (36.7 - 192.8, n=87, last 2 years)	123 fps +63%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	119 (102.7^min) fps +58%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	87.9 (72.3^min) fps +17%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	84.5 (66.4^min) fps +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	77.1 (64^min) fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (32.7 - 107.8, n=58)	76.7 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	75.8 (64.7^min) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	75.4 (59.2^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	70.5 (58.4^min) fps -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	54.4 (40.8^min) fps -28%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia (28 - 184.4, n=90, last 2 years)	109.2 fps +133%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	80.4 (66.9^min) fps +71%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	53 (46.4^min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	48.9 (44.8^min) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	48.8 (44^min) fps +4%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	47.2 (40.4^min) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	46.9 (42.3^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (25.1 - 62.1, n=58)	44.8 fps -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	42.4 (38.6^min) fps -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	36.3 (26.2^min) fps -23%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)	101.6 fps +131%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	73.4 (61.5^min) fps +67%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	48.3 (42.5^min) fps +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	45.6 (41^min) fps +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	45.5 (42^min) fps +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	44 (40^min) fps
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	43.7 (37^min) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (23.3 - 58.2, n=58)	41.9 fps -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	39.8 (36.6^min) fps -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	34.1 (24.1^min) fps -22%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Multimedia (32.9 - 181.6, n=92, last 2 years)	99.3 fps +167%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	66.7 fps +79%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	44.7 fps +20%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	42.2 fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	40.8 fps +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (24.7 - 53.4, n=56)	39.3 fps +6%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	38.8 fps +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	37.7 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	37.2 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	23.6 fps -37%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Multimedia (25.6 - 164.3, n=92, last 2 years)	82.4 fps +182%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	62.7 fps +115%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	33.9 fps +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	33.1 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	32.4 fps +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	31.3 fps +7%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (19.3 - 40.3, n=56)	30.5 fps +4%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	29.7 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	29.2 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	28.9 fps -1%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)	68.4 fps +165%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	53.9 fps +109%
Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	32.8 fps +27%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	29.9 fps +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	29.5 fps +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	28.9 fps +12%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (17.4 - 35.7, n=56)	27.2 fps +5%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	26.4 fps +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	26.2 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	25.8 fps

Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Multimedia (39.7 - 460, n=77, last 2 years)	231 fps +213%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	92.7 (72^min, 76.8^P1) fps +25%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	76.6 (43.3^min, 65.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	73.9 (42.6^min, 65.8^P1) fps
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	72.3 (43^min, 47.8^P1) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (34.8 - 95.3, n=41)	70.4 fps -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	59.6 (40.1^min, 52.7^P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Multimedia (15.2 - 300, n=81, last 2 years)	116.8 fps +306%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	32.3 (27.7^min, 28.5^P1) fps +12%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	30.5 (24.7^min, 26.7^P1) fps +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	29 (20.3^min, 25.2^P1) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	28.8 (20.1^min, 25.9^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (13.4 - 36.1, n=41)	27.1 fps -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	22.9 (14.4^min, 20^P1) fps -20%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Multimedia (12.8 - 244, n=85, last 2 years)	101.5 fps +321%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	25.3 (18.3^min, 19.7^P1) fps +5%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	25 (20.5^min, 21.4^P1) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	24.6 (18.4^min, 19.2^P1) fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	24.1 (17.4^min, 19.2^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (11.5 - 30.1, n=41)	22.7 fps -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	19.3 (7.7^min, 15.3^P1) fps -20%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)	89.9 fps +330%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	21.1 (15.4^min, 16.7^P1) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	20.9 (5.4^min, 16.2^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (9.9 - 25.5, n=39)	19.4 fps -7%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	18.8 (14.8^min, 15.1^P1) fps -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	16.7 (7.5^min, 13.7^P1) fps -20%

Witcher 3 FPS检查

用TheWitcher 3在1080p Ultra下进行压力测试，表明在大多数情况下帧率是稳定的，但我们确实看到偶尔的节流。

Witcher 3 FPS Check

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS R5 5500U, Vega 7: Ø12.6 (6-14)

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	153.6			26.92
The Witcher 3 (2015)	59.1		18.2	12.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	94.8	75.4	46.9	44
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	32.3	16.2	11.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	37.2	29.2	25.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	39	18	17	16
Strange Brigade (2018)	73.9	28.8	24.1	20.9

查看我们专门的 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7页面了解更多信息和性能基准。

排放。单一热管-风扇组合被推向极限

系统噪音

单风扇单热管的安排意味着冷却系统必须努力工作以控制温度并尽量减少节流。我们观察到，即使在看似轻松的工作负荷中，风扇也会启动。

在压力下，我们记录到的风扇噪音水平接近43 dB(A)，特别是在安静的环境中工作时，这是很容易辨别的。

我们没有观察到任何杂乱的噪音，如线圈啸叫或压力下的随机咔嚓声。所提供的硬盘似乎也没有造成任何可察觉的噪音。

	Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Noise		0%	4%	6%	-2%	-3%	4%
off / environment *	28.28	26 8%	26 8%	23.4 17%	26 8%	29.6 -5%	27.1 4%
Idle Minimum *	28.28	26 8%	26 8%	23.6 17%	26 8%	30.5 -8%	27.1 4%
Idle Average *	28.28	26 8%	26 8%	23.6 17%	26 8%	30.5 -8%	27.1 4%
Idle Maximum *	28.28	31.6 -12%	26 8%	23.6 17%	28.8 -2%	30.5 -8%	27.1 4%
Load Average *	35.76	41 -15%	42.6 -19%	41 -15%	45 -26%	35.7 -0%	31.5 12%
Witcher 3 ultra *	42.79			42.9 -0%			37.4 13%
Load Maximum *	42.67	41 4%	37.4 12%	47 -10%	45 -5%	37.2 13%	47.2 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		28.28 / 28.28 / 28.28 dB(A)
Load		35.76 / 42.67 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.28 dB(A)

温度

当处于空闲状态或系统没有受到太多压力时，表面温度是可以容忍的。铰链完全挡住了左上角唯一的风扇排气口，这导致了该区域的热量积聚，你可以在下面的热成像中看到。

在压力下，我们发现通常是设备的中间和右边部分发热。触摸板和掌托区域保持相对凉爽。

对于大多数常规的生产力任务，如网络浏览或办公，该设备可以在膝上使用，没有问题。然而，我们不建议在紧张的情况下在腿上使用该设备，因为在高负荷的情况下，底盖可能会超过42℃的大关。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38.8 °C	41.8 °C	45 °C
36.2 °C	43 °C	43.8 °C
28.2 °C	29.4 °C	30.6 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 37.42 °C


42.2 °C	39.8 °C	41.2 °C
40.6 °C	40.2 °C	37.6 °C
30.6 °C	29.2 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 36.77 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31.6 °C	33.4 °C	33 °C
30.6 °C	32.2 °C	31.6 °C
27.6 °C	28.4 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 30.84 °C


32.4 °C	32.6 °C	30.6 °C
30.8 °C	31.2 °C	28.6 °C
29 °C	29.4 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 30.33 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.8 °C	43 °C	43.8 °C
36 °C	42.6 °C	41.6 °C
28 °C	29.6 °C	30.6 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 37.22 °C


41.8 °C	38.8 °C	40.4 °C
39.4 °C	38.6 °C	36.6 °C
30 °C	29.6 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 36.04 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.42 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.84 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.22 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).

压力测试

在Prime95压力测试中，我们发现CPU的时钟在很短的时间内达到4GHz，然后平均在2.8GHz左右。在这段时间内，核心温度可以达到近77℃，整个压力期间的总体平均温度约为63℃。

加入FurMark后，由于与现在以900MHz运行的iGPU共享电源，最初的CPU峰值时钟刚刚达到约3.2GHz，然后稳定在约2.8GHz。CPU核心温度可以上升到74℃，平均约为67℃。另一方面，GPU的温度峰值约为72℃，而平均温度接近63℃。

压力测试	CPU时钟（GHz）	GPU时钟（MHz）	CPU平均温度（℃）	GPU平均温度（℃）。
系统空闲	2.2	400	41	39.6
Prime95	2.81	200	62.7	59.2
Prime95 + FurMark	2.81	940	66.7	63.3
Witcher 3	1.39	1662	66.3	63.3

我们在平衡和性能AIPT模式下进行了TheWitcher 3压力测试。在平衡模式下，早先分配给GPU核心的平均功率约为16W，现在得到了约20W。这有助于将GPU时钟提高到约1662MHz，其结果是CPU时钟降低到约1.4GHz。

改变到性能模式再次有利于CPU的性能，尽管GPU的性能没有受到很大影响。我们看到CPU时钟现在在2.5GHz和3GHz之间震荡，而功率包络从20W增加到25W。GPU核心功率也得到了增加，但分配非常不稳定，不像CPU使用的25W那样稳定。

发言人

华硕VivoBook 15 KM513提供一对底部发射的立体声扬声器。在最大音量时约为76.83 dB(A)，在环境噪音最小的封闭空间里，它们听起来相当响亮。

扬声器对于一般的听觉是很好的，但缺乏任何形式的低音。然而，中音和高音则要好得多。在最大音量下没有可察觉的失真。只要你离设备不是太远，内置的麦克风就能带来体面的通话体验。

华硕包括一个DTS音频处理应用程序，提供一些音频预设，并允许基本的定制。那些希望获得更好的音频质量的人最好通过3.5毫米组合音频插孔或蓝牙来实现。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。消耗经济，但电池寿命差

消耗功率

VivoBook 15 KM513的功耗总体上与我们观察到的其他Ryzen 5 5500U驱动的笔记本电脑相同。这惠普14s-fq13357ng具有类似规格的惠普14s-fq13357ng似乎更经济20%。虽然华硕ZenBook 13 UM325S虽然华硕ZenBook 13 UM325S在负载测试中抽出的电量要少得多，但VivoBook 15在空闲功耗方面的表现相对较好。

华硕没有在VivoBook 15上提供USB Type-C充电，所以在移动时，你只能依靠提供的充电器。箱内的65瓦电源适配器即使在压力下也能为设备提供足够的电力。

Prime95和FurMark在10s的时候一起开始。消耗量很快就在~60W附近达到峰值，然后下降到~55W，最后降到~47W

Witcher 3 ，在10s的时候开始。消耗量上升到~52W，然后平均为39W

Power Consumption

Idle	4.96 / 7.38 / 7.79 Watt
Load	41.77 / 50.95 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Vega 7, R5 5500U	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00	Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Power Consumption		20%	-1%	-16%	-17%	-18%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	4.96	4.2 15%	3.7 25%	3.7 25%	5 -1%	7.4 -49%	3.9 21%
Idle Average *	7.38	6.3 15%	7.9 -7%	6.3 15%	7.7 -4%	10.4 -41%	6.9 7%
Idle Maximum *	7.79	7 10%	9.3 -19%	9.7 -25%	12.2 -57%	11.1 -42%	8.5 -9%
Load Average *	41.77	27.7 34%	41 2%	59 -41%	41 2%	35.7 15%	30.5 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	38.2	27.7 27%	41 -7%	51.4 -35%	43 -13%		42.6 -12%
Load Maximum *	50.95	42 18%	52.2 -2%	67.7 -33%	65 -28%	37.2 27%	69.7 -37%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.2 (7.93-52.5)

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø50.8 (10.1-60.6)

电池寿命

尽管采用了低功耗的APU和OLED面板，但电池寿命是VivoBook 15 KM513的一个主要缺陷。捆绑的42Wh电池只能提供平均的空闲运行时间。我们在150cd/^m2亮度下进行的标准化Wi-Fi 1.3网络浏览测试中，只差6.5小时，而当亮度全部调高时，则降至4小时22分。任何过度的负载都会使电池寿命大打折扣。

我们觉得3芯电池的配置本可以用来提供更大的容量。对于那些需要更大容量电池的人来说，让2.5英寸的存储空间成为可选项也将是一个受欢迎的选择。

附带的适配器可以在大约1.5小时内将笔记本从0充电到100%。华硕并没有宣传VivoBook 15 KM513有任何形式的快速充电功能。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 22.9min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		4h 19.4min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 53min

	Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS R5 5500U, Vega 7, 42 Wh	HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7, 41 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7, 70 Wh	Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 42 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA R7 5700U, Vega 8, 50 Wh	Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S R7 5800U, Vega 8, 67 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 P97F i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 53 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		14%	136%	18%	41%	161%	47%	55%
Reader / Idle	709	675 -5%		799 13%		1394 97%	1127 59%	933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years) 32%
WiFi v1.3	382.9	507 32%	839 119%	361 -6%	538 41%	551 44%	499 30%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) 49%
Load	53		134 153%	78 47%		234 342%	80 51%	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years) 84%
Witcher 3 ultra		89	110					81.8 ?(57 - 104, n=5, last 2 years)
H.264			925			592		710 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 良好的无线网络速度

+ 可扩展的内存和存储

+ 明亮的OLED面板，100%的DCI-P3覆盖率，支持直流调光和HDR

+ 良好的持续CPU性能，可选择性能模式

+ 可容忍的表面温度

Cons

- 塑料结构中有些弯曲

- USB Type-C不支持电源传输或DisplayPort输出

- 狭窄的触摸板

- 单一的热管-风扇组合导致了更高的排放

- 整体电池寿命不佳

评语。提高了对中档产品的期望值

长期以来，OEM厂商和终端用户都满足于中端市场上平庸的显示屏。任何对OLED或高色域显示器的渴望都意味着要为类似的内部设备付出不成比例的超额费用。

华硕的VivoBook产品与更高端的ZenBook系列相比，传统上被认为是事后的产物。新的华硕VivoBook K系列试图改变这些模式。

VivoBook 15 KM513仍然选择了一个主要的塑料结构。虽然弯曲度很小，但随着Realme和小米的许多预算产品越来越多地选择全金属底盘，VivoBook系列急需重新设计底盘。连接选项是体面的，但华硕似乎通过提供USB Type-C而没有充分利用它的潜力，留下了一个悬而未决的胡萝卜。

三星OLED面板无疑是VivoBook 15 KM513的主要USP，它具有出色的色彩再现，良好的亮度水平，原生HDR支持，低响应时间，以及良好的可视角度。虽然直流调光是PWM的一个更好的选择，但希望将亮度降低到50%以下的用户将不得不与低PWM频率作斗争。

华硕VivoBook 15 KM513提高了人们对一台价格为62,990（846美元）的中档笔记本电脑的期望。凭借出色的显示屏和稳定的APU性能，如果你能接受一些连接和电池寿命方面的妥协，VivoBook 15 KM513是一款容易推荐的一般生产力。

华硕似乎没有以任何方式削弱AMD Ryzen 5500U的性能，甚至提供三种性能模式供用户选择。也就是说，该设备的排放是一个值得关注的领域。我们观察到明显响亮的风扇噪音和糟糕的电池寿命。VivoBook 15的主要竞争对手，如HP 14s-fq1357ng ，Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 ，华硕自己的ZenBook 13 UM325S ，甚至Tiger Lake- poweredDell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 在这方面都表现得更好，给或取几个百分比。

华硕可能在小心翼翼地保持价格的竞争力，但对USB-C充电和更大的电池等基本功能的期望，在2021年末肯定不会超过这个水平。希望华硕能在即将到来的VivoBook迭代中建立这种势头。

价格和可用性

华硕VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS目前已通过Flipkart在印度上市。.买家可以利用几个折扣和返现选项，以及在标准和无成本的EMI计划中购买的设施。全球供货情况尚不清楚。

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

78 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

50 / 80 → 63%

Weight

65 / 20-72 → 87%

Battery

71 / 95 → 75%

Display

88%

Games Performance

62 / 90 → 69%

Application Performance

90 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

93 / 95 → 98%

Audio

71%

Camera

25 / 85 → 29%

Average

67%

81%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Vaidyanathan Subramaniam - Managing Editor - 1901 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @Geeky_Vaidy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕VivoBook 15 KM513笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen和OLED的好处是不会破坏银行的利益

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2021-11-26 (Update: 2021-11-26)

华硕VivoBook 15 KM513笔记本电脑评测。Ryzen和OLED的好处是不会破坏银行的利益

Potential competitors in comparison

外壳。坚固的塑料，有一些弯曲

Size Comparison

连接性。残缺的USB-C型

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备。体面的键盘，但触摸板很拥挤

键盘

触摸板

显示屏。三星OLED面板，具有直流调光和HDR功能

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能。Ryzen 5具有良好的持续多核性能

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS检查

Witcher 3 FPS Check

排放。单一热管-风扇组合被推向极限

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus VivoBook 15 KM513UA-L503TS audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

能源管理。消耗经济，但电池寿命差

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语。提高了对中档产品的期望值

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare