惠普14s with Ryzen in review:廉价的笔记本电脑让人看到了潜力

作为一个主流平台,惠普14s配备了制造商所有可以想象的变体的硬件。无论是英特尔还是AMD芯片,大的和小的硬盘,最小的或慷慨的工作内存配置。因此,从280欧元(约333美元,不含Windows系统)到近850欧元(约1010美元,英特尔高端),每个人都有自己的选择。
我们的测试模型处于较低的中场,价格为530欧元(约630美元,不含Windows),但理论上可以通过Ryzen 5000 SoC跟上英特尔的高端产品。你可以在评论中找到我们不推荐该机型的原因。
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.9 % | 09/2021 | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
79.1 % | HP 14s-dq1431ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
86.3 % | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.9 % | 05/2021 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能。可升级的子笔记本
由于底座上有薄薄的铝板,塑料底盘看起来很悦目,但这对稳定性没有帮助。轻巧的底盘只具有相当的抗扭性,铰链上的运动会使结构的邻近区域变形。键盘的弯曲度很大,底座可以在有限的范围内从下面弯曲。显示屏上的压力导致了亮度的变化(在黑色图像中可以识别)。
该机型可以升级,有两个内存插槽,一个M.2 2280插槽用于SSD,一个M.2 2230用于WiFi芯片。由于测试结果不佳,我们会先抛出后者。SD卡读卡器也很慢,但幸运的是你并不经常需要它。弹出机制的缺失很令人讨厌。SD卡被简单地卡在插槽中,我们不得不用指尖在只伸出4毫米的卡上挣扎。
至少1.4公斤(约3.1磅)的重量是可敬的,联想的竞争对手更重更厚。端口在右边,而且距离很近,这可能会给USB加密狗带来问题,例如用于以太网。Type-C USB不能用于充电,也不适合作为DisplayPort输出--至少它拒绝与我们的Type-C转HDMI线一起工作。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14.9 - 194.7, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 239, n=41, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (54.8 - 339, n=21) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (86 - 348, n=21) |

输入设备。惠普笔记本电脑被证明是弱点
显示屏:不是一个最佳的笔记本显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 220 cd/m²
Contrast: 978:1 (Black: 0.225 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.16 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
39.37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE NVM140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP 14s-dq1431ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 69% | 5% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.11 | 37.47 -2% | 64.8 70% | 40.3 6% | 38.42 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 57 | 56 -2% | 96.3 69% | 59.5 4% | 57.7 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.37 | 38.71 -2% | 66.1 68% | 41.7 6% | 39.71 1% |
Response Times | -2% | 27% | 17% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 41 ? -0% | 31.2 ? 24% | 35.2 ? 14% | 41 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 28 ? -4% | 19.2 ? 29% | 21.6 ? 20% | 25 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 29800 | ||||
Screen | -7% | 20% | -3% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 220 | 357 62% | 341 55% | 341 55% | 305 39% |
Brightness | 223 | 315 41% | 313 40% | 327 47% | 264 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 82 -4% | 87 2% | 90 6% | 81 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.225 | 0.455 -102% | 0.27 -20% | 0.26 -16% | 0.16 29% |
Contrast | 978 | 785 -20% | 1263 29% | 1312 34% | 1906 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.16 | 3.98 4% | 1.76 58% | 5.1 -23% | 5.44 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.43 | 6.92 7% | 4.85 35% | 17.6 -137% | 20.42 -175% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 3.33 -42% | 3.3 -40% | 2.1 11% | 3.23 -37% |
Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.47 89% | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6389 102% | 6138 106% | 7233 90% | 6755 96% | 7035 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 66 | 37 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 89 | 58 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 4.4 | 4.72 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-5% | 39% /
32% | 6% /
2% | -1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19947 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
色彩也没有给14s带来提升;sRGB只覆盖了57%。如果你想在这个价格范围内寻找一个真正好的显示器,你最好选择 Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7它能覆盖96%的sRGB,而且亮度更高。至少灰度再现得相当好(没有明显的偏蓝),而且在降低亮度时没有PWM。
性能。AMD的笔记本处理器没有达到最高水平
Ryzen 5 5500U5700U和3500U是市场上可能的AMD配置,Athlon的变种也可能提供(在德国没有)。英特尔的姐妹们从赛扬N4500开始,到酷睿i3-1115G4,最后到i7-1165G7。AMD机型大多提供16GB内存,英特尔则提供8GB。
处理器
Ryzen 5 5500U ,涡轮增压高达4GHz,基础时钟为2.1GHz。六个Zen核心在芯片中工作,并增加了一个最高频率为1800 MHz的Radeon RX Vega图形单元。APU的图形和处理器部分都会根据散热条件改变其时钟。如果SoC上的温度过高,它就会节制时钟,直到废热沉降到一定限度以下。这在惠普14s中刚刚超过60度。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
芯片 Ryzen 5 5500U不能永久地运行其4000MHz的Turbo,而只是几秒钟。在R15中,时钟在4秒后已经回到2500兆赫,然后稳定在3000兆赫以下。因此,在前七次运行中,分数悠然下降,但随后让步了一些,保持在950分的水平。A 联想ThinkPad E14 G3采用了相同的SoC,表明在长期使用中可以达到1160分。我们的 Ryzen 5 5500U在启动时(-11%)和加载时(-19%)比较弱。2100MHz的基础时钟没有被削弱。
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (409 - 1796, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1149 - 1183, n=15) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6030 - 8565, n=16) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (965 - 12181, n=89, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (157 - 690, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (452 - 461, n=16) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (2223 - 3316, n=17) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (376 - 4741, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (70.1 - 256, n=104, last 2 years) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (170 - 179, n=15) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (995 - 1412, n=17) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 2057, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (253 - 2650, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (358 - 490, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2145 - 5800, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4174 - 4378, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (31060 - 36896, n=14) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5832 - 54374, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (293 - 1937, n=101, last 2 years) | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1088 - 1123, n=16) |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1024 - 9817, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4645 - 5917, n=16) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (7.23 - 9.74, n=16) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.02 - 14.8, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (60 - 80.7, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (12.9 - 157, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4612 - 1.728, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (0.607 - 0.642, n=15) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark在所有学科中都低于平均水平,但是-5到-15%不应该被高估。该系统在任何时候都能顺利工作,20个浏览器标签和几个程序并没有立即使惠普14s陷入困境。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4787 - 5218, n=11) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1671 - 6414, n=96, last 2 years) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4599 - 10836, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8715 - 9789, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6262 - 7942, n=11) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2797 - 9852, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4774 - 5540, n=11) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (973 - 7298, n=96, last 2 years) | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
PCMark 10 Score | 4809 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH | Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 57% | 89% | 37% | 20% | 17% | 45% | |
Write 4K | 94.8 | 93.3 -2% | 223.7 136% | 83.3 -12% | 142.8 51% | 153.1 ? 61% | 148.7 ? 57% |
Read 4K | 48.93 | 38.87 -21% | 51.2 5% | 46.84 -4% | 167.4 242% | 64.6 ? 32% | 53.3 ? 9% |
Write Seq | 1059 | 2834 168% | 2579 144% | 2195 107% | 232.1 -78% | 1125 ? 6% | 1978 ? 87% |
Read Seq | 1620 | 2452 51% | 2553 58% | 2112 30% | 1128 -30% | 1808 ? 12% | 1922 ? 19% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 400 | 386.6 -3% | 671 68% | 439.7 10% | 438 10% | 367 ? -8% | 427 ? 7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 377.2 | 495.5 31% | 761 102% | 391.1 4% | 491.2 30% | 507 ? 34% | 459 ? 22% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1136 | 2981 162% | 2721 140% | 2484 119% | 622 -45% | 1138 ? 0% | 2329 ? 105% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2073 | 3566 72% | 3358 62% | 2995 44% | 1566 -24% | 1997 ? -4% | 3256 ? 57% |
AS SSD | 58% | 79% | 46% | -49% | -3% | 20% | |
Seq Read | 1784 | 2645 48% | 3021 69% | 2596 46% | 677 -62% | 1885 ? 6% | 2543 ? 43% |
Seq Write | 742 | 2627 254% | 2341 215% | 1460 97% | 194.7 -74% | 998 ? 35% | 1515 ? 104% |
4K Read | 58.3 | 55.2 -5% | 47.9 -18% | 48.62 -17% | 58.1 0% | 62.2 ? 7% | 52.3 ? -10% |
4K Write | 141.9 | 119.4 -16% | 186.7 32% | 113.4 -20% | 124.1 -13% | 162 ? 14% | 146.9 ? 4% |
4K-64 Read | 582 | 1308 125% | 1472 153% | 1419 144% | 219.6 -62% | 585 ? 1% | 996 ? 71% |
4K-64 Write | 1047 | 1816 73% | 1829 75% | 1840 76% | 638 -39% | 863 ? -18% | 1215 ? 16% |
Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.057 -10% | 0.06 -15% | 0.049 6% | 0.109 -110% | 0.07329 ? -41% | 0.07747 ? -49% |
Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.031 33% | 0.021 54% | 0.032 30% | 0.065 -41% | 0.04957 ? -8% | 0.06984 ? -52% |
Score Read | 819 | 1628 99% | 1822 122% | 1727 111% | 345 -58% | 836 ? 2% | 1303 ? 59% |
Score Write | 1263 | 2198 74% | 2249 78% | 2099 66% | 782 -38% | 1125 ? -11% | 1513 ? 20% |
Score Total | 2469 | 4667 89% | 4973 101% | 4658 89% | 1305 -47% | 2366 ? -4% | 3442 ? 39% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1067 | 1476 38% | 1168 9% | 1191 ? 12% | 1540 ? 44% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 597 | 538 -10% | 590 -1% | 477 ? -20% | 511 ? -14% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1019 | 1185 16% | 1148 13% | 857 ? -16% | 1008 ? -1% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 58% /
58% | 84% /
83% | 42% /
43% | -15% /
-20% | 7% /
4% | 33% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous power reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于集成了Radeon RX Vega 7 SoC显卡,惠普14s有其局限性;这款14英寸的产品并非为游戏而设计。我们的游戏表立即显示了这一点。那里的游戏是3-5年前的,最多只能在中等设置下玩。如果你认真考虑目前的游戏,你应该寻找一个替代品
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (410 - 16128, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (3372 - 5731, n=37) | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (315 - 11055, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1772 - 3778, n=41) | |
HP 14s-dq1431ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (116 - 4721, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (496 - 1152, n=37) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5982 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3073 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1203 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
如果你用Ultra设置推动图形,你会遇到热限制,正如我们用Witcher 3 Ultra的测试所显示的那样。FPS保持在25分钟,然后与CPU和GPU时钟一起下降到10-11。在这里,GPU时钟从1800降到1200MHz,CPU时钟从3500降到1500MHz。这一切都发生在保持SoC的温度低于60摄氏度(140华氏度)。这对低废热很有好处,但却泄露了Radeon Vega RX的性能,然后低于平均值。
在测试中,中等程度的硬件密集型游戏和3DMarks并没有受到影响。与竞争对手相比,惠普14s的性能并不差,在某些情况下甚至领先于其他Vega RX 7s。带有iGPU Iris Xe的英特尔竞争产品大多被打败,即使有强大的Core i7 (Honor Magicbook 14i7).