惠普14s with Ryzen in review:廉价的笔记本电脑让人看到了潜力

14英寸的主流产品，没有亮点。 slim 14s是制造商的一个面包和黄油模型。它可以配备从廉价到昂贵的硬件。我们看一下2021年的机型，配备流行的Ryzen 5000芯片。我们是否发现当前AMD一代的优势在这里也得到了证实？部分是的，部分不是。

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 09/05/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Windows Laptop / Notebook

作为一个主流平台，惠普14s配备了制造商所有可以想象的变体的硬件。无论是英特尔还是AMD芯片，大的和小的硬盘，最小的或慷慨的工作内存配置。因此，从280欧元（约333美元，不含Windows系统）到近850欧元（约1010美元，英特尔高端），每个人都有自己的选择。

我们的测试模型处于较低的中场，价格为530欧元（约630美元，不含Windows），但理论上可以通过Ryzen 5000 SoC跟上英特尔的高端产品。你可以在评论中找到我们不推荐该机型的原因。

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
76.9 %	09/2021	HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
79.1 %		HP 14s-dq1431ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	1.5 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
86.3 %		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.4 kg	19.1 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.9 %	05/2021	Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
86.7 %	08/2021	Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE R5 5500U, Vega 7	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

外壳和功能。可升级的子笔记本

由于底座上有薄薄的铝板，塑料底盘看起来很悦目，但这对稳定性没有帮助。轻巧的底盘只具有相当的抗扭性，铰链上的运动会使结构的邻近区域变形。键盘的弯曲度很大，底座可以在有限的范围内从下面弯曲。显示屏上的压力导致了亮度的变化（在黑色图像中可以识别）。

该机型可以升级，有两个内存插槽，一个M.2 2280插槽用于SSD，一个M.2 2230用于WiFi芯片。由于测试结果不佳，我们会先抛出后者。SD卡读卡器也很慢，但幸运的是你并不经常需要它。弹出机制的缺失很令人讨厌。SD卡被简单地卡在插槽中，我们不得不用指尖在只伸出4毫米的卡上挣扎。

至少1.4公斤（约3.1磅）的重量是可敬的，联想的竞争对手更重更厚。端口在右边，而且距离很近，这可能会给USB加密狗带来问题，例如用于以太网。Type-C USB不能用于充电，也不适合作为DisplayPort输出--至少它拒绝与我们的Type-C转HDMI线一起工作。

Size comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE HP 14s-fq1357ng Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 ❌

连接设备

音频组合，3 x USB 3.0，一次为C型，两次为A型，HDMI 1.4b，空心插座（电源接口）。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook (14.9 - 194.7, n=42, last 2 years)	79.3 MB/s ∼100% +133%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE	77.5 MB/s ∼98% +128%
HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36.4 MB/s ∼46% +7%
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	34 MB/s ∼43%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 239, n=41, last 2 years)	88.6 MB/s ∼100% +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE	85.9 MB/s ∼97% +130%
HP 14s-dq1431ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	38.7 MB/s ∼44% +4%
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	37.3 MB/s ∼42%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 (1117^min - 1459^max) MBit/s ∼100% +381%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1352 (674^min - 1509^max) MBit/s ∼98% +371%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	870 (441^min - 906^max) MBit/s ∼63% +203%
HP 14s-dq1431ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	663 (431^min - 696^max) MBit/s ∼48% +131%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	287 (152^min - 308^max) MBit/s ∼21%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (54.8 - 339, n=21)	278 MBit/s ∼20% -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1392 (1295^min - 1594^max) MBit/s ∼100% +370%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1191 (1067^min - 1275^max) MBit/s ∼86% +302%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE	790 (405^min - 842^max) MBit/s ∼57% +167%
HP 14s-dq1431ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	632 (615^min - 642^max) MBit/s ∼45% +114%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	296 (271^min - 305^max) MBit/s ∼21%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (86 - 348, n=21)	270 MBit/s ∼19% -9%

HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø295 (271-305)

HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1391 (1295-1594)

Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1190 (1067-1275)

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (405-842)

HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø631 (615-642)

HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (152-308)

HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE HP 14s-fq1357ng Realtek RTL8821CE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1380 (1117-1459)

Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1329 (674-1509)

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø856 (441-906)

HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (431-696)

ColorChecker HP 14s-fq1357ng: 19.99 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 31.2 ∆E

输入设备。惠普笔记本电脑被证明是弱点

该输入法因其屈服的子结构而受到影响。在打字时，按键会屈服，导致打字时有一种海绵状的感觉，没有什么乐趣。平滑的按键有清晰的行程，而且很安静。没有照明，而且字迹可以更强，符合我们的口味。很少需要的F键被设计成Fn辅助键。

宽大的点击板对边缘很敏感，只比掌托略低，有一个清晰的压力点。然而，行程很小。事实证明，穿透力很强的点击噪音是令人讨厌的。

显示屏：不是一个最佳的笔记本显示屏

友达显示器配备了1920 x 1080像素，抗反射能力较弱，这意味着存在某种丝滑的光泽，这在阳光下也是令人讨厌的。平均223cd/m²的亮度对此无能为力。

对比度为978:1，这个数值几乎是英特尔姐妹产品的两倍，尽管根据命名法，它是相同的AUO面板类型。原因是黑值略低（0.22而不是0.16），英特尔姐妹的亮度更高。AMD Vari Bright没有激活，该设备没有像通常的AMD笔记本电脑那样与相应的Radeon软件一起工作。


227 cd/m²	216 cd/m²	205 cd/m²
226 cd/m²	220 cd/m²	232 cd/m²
217 cd/m²	242 cd/m²	222 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO403D

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 242 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 223 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 220 cd/m²
Contrast: 978:1 (Black: 0.225 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.16 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
39.37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE NVM140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP 14s-dq1431ng AUO403D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display		-2%	69%	5%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	38.11	37.47 -2%	64.8 70%	40.3 6%	38.42 1%
sRGB Coverage	57	56 -2%	96.3 69%	59.5 4%	57.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.37	38.71 -2%	66.1 68%	41.7 6%	39.71 1%
Response Times		-2%	27%	17%	4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(19, 22)	41 ?(18, 23) -0%	31.2 ?(14.8, 16.4) 24%	35.2 ?(17.2, 18) 14%	41 ?(20, 21) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(15, 12)	28 ?(15, 13) -4%	19.2 ?(10.8, 8.4) 29%	21.6 ?(12.4, 9.2) 20%	25 ?(14, 11) 7%
PWM Frequency		29800
Screen		-7%	20%	-3%	-8%
Brightness middle	220	357 62%	341 55%	341 55%	305 39%
Brightness	223	315 41%	313 40%	327 47%	264 18%
Brightness Distribution	85	82 -4%	87 2%	90 6%	81 -5%
Black Level *	0.225	0.455 -102%	0.27 -20%	0.26 -16%	0.16 29%
Contrast	978	785 -20%	1263 29%	1312 34%	1906 95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.16	3.98 4%	1.76 58%	5.1 -23%	5.44 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.43	6.92 7%	4.85 35%	17.6 -137%	20.42 -175%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.35	3.33 -42%	3.3 -40%	2.1 11%	3.23 -37%
Gamma	2.62 ^84%	2.47 ^89%	2.26 ^97%	2.11 ^104%	2.45 ^90%
CCT	6389 ^102%	6138 ^106%	7233 ^90%	6755 ^96%	7035 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		36	66		37
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		56	89		58
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			1.01	4.4	4.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -5%	39% / 32%	6% / 2%	-1% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19947 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

色彩也没有给14s带来提升；sRGB只覆盖了57%。如果你想在这个价格范围内寻找一个真正好的显示器，你最好选择 Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7它能覆盖96%的sRGB，而且亮度更高。至少灰度再现得相当好（没有明显的偏蓝），而且在降低亮度时没有PWM。

性能。AMD的笔记本处理器没有达到最高水平

Ryzen 5 5500U5700U和3500U是市场上可能的AMD配置，Athlon的变种也可能提供（在德国没有）。英特尔的姐妹们从赛扬N4500开始，到酷睿i3-1115G4，最后到i7-1165G7。AMD机型大多提供16GB内存，英特尔则提供8GB。

处理器

Ryzen 5 5500U ，涡轮增压高达4GHz，基础时钟为2.1GHz。六个Zen核心在芯片中工作，并增加了一个最高频率为1800 MHz的Radeon RX Vega图形单元。APU的图形和处理器部分都会根据散热条件改变其时钟。如果SoC上的温度过高，它就会节制时钟，直到废热沉降到一定限度以下。这在惠普14s中刚刚超过60度。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø996 (940.2-1110.59)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1156 (1134.46-1251.72)

Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø870 (762.33-887.51)

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U: Ø1207 (1162.45-1245.1)

HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø373 (322.23-600.93)

芯片 Ryzen 5 5500U不能永久地运行其4000MHz的Turbo，而只是几秒钟。在R15中，时钟在4秒后已经回到2500兆赫，然后稳定在3000兆赫以下。因此，在前七次运行中，分数悠然下降，但随后让步了一些，保持在950分的水平。A 联想ThinkPad E14 G3采用了相同的SoC，表明在长期使用中可以达到1160分。我们的 Ryzen 5 5500U在启动时（-11%）和加载时（-19%）比较弱。2100MHz的基础时钟没有被削弱。

Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (409 - 1796, n=87, last 2 years)	1357 Points ∼100% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1183 Points ∼87% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1178 Points ∼87% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1149 - 1183, n=15)	1173 Points ∼86% +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1167 Points ∼86%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7469 Points ∼100% +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6030 - 8565, n=16)	7228 Points ∼97% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	6964 Points ∼93% +9%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	6394 Points ∼86%
Average of class Subnotebook (965 - 12181, n=89, last 2 years)	6310 Points ∼84% -1%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	577 Points ∼100% +28%
Average of class Subnotebook (157 - 690, n=107, last 2 years)	498 Points ∼86% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	461 Points ∼80% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	459 Points ∼80% +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (452 - 461, n=16)	457 Points ∼79% +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	452 Points ∼78%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	428 Points ∼74% -5%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	428 Points ∼74% -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2886 Points ∼100% +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (2223 - 3316, n=17)	2762 Points ∼96% +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2570 Points ∼89% +16%
Average of class Subnotebook (376 - 4741, n=106, last 2 years)	2299 Points ∼80% +3%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	2242 Points ∼78% +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	2223 Points ∼77%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1210 Points ∼42% -46%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1210 Points ∼42% -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	227 Points ∼100% +28%
Average of class Subnotebook (70.1 - 256, n=104, last 2 years)	195.8 Points ∼86% +11%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	177 Points ∼78%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	176 Points ∼78% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (170 - 179, n=15)	175.8 Points ∼77% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	172 Points ∼76% -3%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	170 Points ∼75% -4%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1252 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1245 (1162.45^min - 1245.1^max) Points ∼99% +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (995 - 1412, n=17)	1219 Points ∼97% +10%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1112 (946.23^min - 1112.47^max) Points ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 2057, n=112, last 2 years)	1030 Points ∼82% -7%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	888 (762.33^min - 887.51^max) Points ∼71% -20%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	606 Points ∼48% -46%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1002 Seconds * ∼100% -104%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1002 Seconds * ∼100% -104%
Average of class Subnotebook (253 - 2650, n=103, last 2 years)	631 Seconds * ∼63% -29%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	528 Seconds * ∼53% -8%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	490 Seconds * ∼49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	447 Seconds * ∼45% +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (358 - 490, n=14)	416 Seconds * ∼42% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	393 Seconds * ∼39% +20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5382 MIPS ∼100% +26%
Average of class Subnotebook (2145 - 5800, n=100, last 2 years)	4696 MIPS ∼87% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4341 MIPS ∼81% +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4174 - 4378, n=15)	4306 MIPS ∼80% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4285 MIPS ∼80% 0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	4268 MIPS ∼79%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	4231 MIPS ∼79% -1%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	4231 MIPS ∼79% -1%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	34899 MIPS ∼100% +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (31060 - 36896, n=14)	34346 MIPS ∼98% +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	31686 MIPS ∼91% +2%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	31060 MIPS ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook (5832 - 54374, n=100, last 2 years)	26990 MIPS ∼77% -13%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	25506 MIPS ∼73% -18%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	13236 MIPS ∼38% -57%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	13236 MIPS ∼38% -57%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1573 Points ∼100% +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (293 - 1937, n=101, last 2 years)	1359 Points ∼86% +21%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1219 Points ∼77% +9%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	1219 Points ∼77% +9%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1119 Points ∼71%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1118 Points ∼71% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1109 Points ∼71% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1088 - 1123, n=16)	1109 Points ∼71% -1%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5523 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5468 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (1024 - 9817, n=101, last 2 years)	5457 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4645 - 5917, n=16)	5408 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5360 Points ∼97% -3%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5089 Points ∼92% -8%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	3858 Points ∼70% -30%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	3858 Points ∼70% -30%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	8.77 fps ∼100% +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (7.23 - 9.74, n=16)	8.69 fps ∼99% +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	8.08 fps ∼92% +12%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	7.23 fps ∼82%
Average of class Subnotebook (1.02 - 14.8, n=94, last 2 years)	7.2 fps ∼82% 0%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.06 fps ∼81% -2%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	3.32 fps ∼38% -54%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	3.32 fps ∼38% -54%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	70.9 s * ∼100% -5%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	70.9 s * ∼100% -5%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	67.3 s * ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (60 - 80.7, n=13)	66.1 s * ∼93% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	62 s * ∼87% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	61.9 s * ∼87% +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (12.9 - 157, n=99, last 2 years)	60.4 s * ∼85% +10%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	47.4 s * ∼67% +30%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	0.736 sec * ∼100% -18%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Core i5-1035G1	0.736 sec * ∼100% -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4612 - 1.728, n=99, last 2 years)	0.659 sec * ∼90% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.625 sec * ∼85% -0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (0.607 - 0.642, n=15)	0.625 sec * ∼85% -0%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.622 sec * ∼85%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	0.614 sec * ∼83% +1%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.552 sec * ∼75% +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1112 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

66 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

PCMark在所有学科中都低于平均水平，但是-5到-15%不应该被高估。该系统在任何时候都能顺利工作，20个浏览器标签和几个程序并没有立即使惠普14s陷入困境。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5193 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	5097 Points ∼98% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4787 - 5218, n=11)	5077 Points ∼98% +6%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5036 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1671 - 6414, n=96, last 2 years)	4835 Points ∼93% +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4809 Points ∼93%
HP 14s-dq1431ng UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	3676 Points ∼71% -24%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9985 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (4599 - 10836, n=96, last 2 years)	9308 Points ∼93% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9303 Points ∼93% +1%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	9242 Points ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8715 - 9789, n=11)	9164 Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	9154 Points ∼92% -1%
HP 14s-dq1431ng UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	8322 Points ∼83% -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	7819 Points ∼100% +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	7717 Points ∼99% +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6262 - 7942, n=11)	7470 Points ∼96% +13%
Average of class Subnotebook (2797 - 9852, n=96, last 2 years)	6932 Points ∼89% +5%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6802 Points ∼87% +3%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	6622 Points ∼85%
HP 14s-dq1431ng UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	5483 Points ∼70% -17%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5297 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4774 - 5540, n=11)	5202 Points ∼98% +5%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5103 Points ∼96% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	5023 Points ∼95% +2%
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	4934 Points ∼93%
Average of class Subnotebook (973 - 7298, n=96, last 2 years)	4824 Points ∼91% -2%
HP 14s-dq1431ng UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	2954 Points ∼56% -40%

PCMark 10 Score		4809 points
Help

DPC延迟

在使用LatencyMon的测试中，惠普14s显示中断时间增加，ACPI和网络驱动造成的延迟最高。因此，我们的测试配置不适合实时应用或类似的应用，但这可能随着未来的更新而改变。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	2489 μs * ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	1229 μs * ∼49% +51%
HP 14s-dq1431ng UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	887 μs * ∼36% +64%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	592 μs * ∼24% +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	474.4 μs * ∼19% +81%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

这里安装的容量为512GB的PCIe固态硬盘美光2210（M.2 2280）在存储基准中实现了低于平均水平的写入和读取率。与WDC、三星和SK Hynix的竞争对手在这里更快。然而，采用英特尔Optane内存的姐妹产品惠普14s-dq1431ng（英特尔）却很容易被打败。

	HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH	Average Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD	Average of class Subnotebook
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		57%	89%	37%	20%	17%	45%
Write 4K	94.8	93.3 -2%	223.7 136%	83.3 -12%	142.8 51%	153.1 ?(94.8 - 259, n=7) 61%	148.7 ?(63.9 - 324, n=81, last 2 years) 57%
Read 4K	48.93	38.87 -21%	51.2 5%	46.84 -4%	167.4 242%	64.6 ?(48.9 - 79.4, n=7) 32%	53.3 ?(22.2 - 94.1, n=81, last 2 years) 9%
Write Seq	1059	2834 168%	2579 144%	2195 107%	232.1 -78%	1125 ?(1059 - 1154, n=6) 6%	1978 ?(198 - 18545, n=72, last 2 years) 87%
Read Seq	1620	2452 51%	2553 58%	2112 30%	1128 -30%	1808 ?(1620 - 1990, n=6) 12%	1922 ?(373 - 4560, n=72, last 2 years) 19%
Write 4K Q32T1	400	386.6 -3%	671 68%	439.7 10%	438 10%	367 ?(64.7 - 539, n=7) -8%	427 ?(117.3 - 707, n=81, last 2 years) 7%
Read 4K Q32T1	377.2	495.5 31%	761 102%	391.1 4%	491.2 30%	507 ?(377 - 555, n=7) 34%	459 ?(135.2 - 951, n=81, last 2 years) 22%
Write Seq Q32T1	1136	2981 162%	2721 140%	2484 119%	622 -45%	1138 ?(1095 - 1158, n=7) 0%	2329 ?(173 - 5233, n=81, last 2 years) 105%
Read Seq Q32T1	2073	3566 72%	3358 62%	2995 44%	1566 -24%	1997 ?(1668 - 2248, n=7) -4%	3256 ?(437 - 7113, n=81, last 2 years) 57%
AS SSD		58%	79%	46%	-49%	-3%	20%
Seq Read	1784	2645 48%	3021 69%	2596 46%	677 -62%	1885 ?(1473 - 2036, n=7) 6%	2543 ?(426 - 5546, n=94, last 2 years) 43%
Seq Write	742	2627 254%	2341 215%	1460 97%	194.7 -74%	998 ?(742 - 1109, n=7) 35%	1515 ?(114 - 3955, n=94, last 2 years) 104%
4K Read	58.3	55.2 -5%	47.9 -18%	48.62 -17%	58.1 0%	62.2 ?(54.9 - 73.9, n=7) 7%	52.3 ?(8.95 - 84.8, n=94, last 2 years) -10%
4K Write	141.9	119.4 -16%	186.7 32%	113.4 -20%	124.1 -13%	162 ?(127 - 232, n=7) 14%	146.9 ?(48 - 294, n=94, last 2 years) 4%
4K-64 Read	582	1308 125%	1472 153%	1419 144%	219.6 -62%	585 ?(581 - 589, n=7) 1%	996 ?(122.9 - 2938, n=94, last 2 years) 71%
4K-64 Write	1047	1816 73%	1829 75%	1840 76%	638 -39%	863 ?(196.4 - 1047, n=7) -18%	1215 ?(125.7 - 2732, n=94, last 2 years) 16%
Access Time Read *	0.052	0.057 -10%	0.06 -15%	0.049 6%	0.109 -110%	0.07329 ?(0.035 - 0.117, n=7) -41%	0.07747 ?(0.023 - 0.5, n=93, last 2 years) -49%
Access Time Write *	0.046	0.031 33%	0.021 54%	0.032 30%	0.065 -41%	0.04957 ?(0.039 - 0.092, n=7) -8%	0.06984 ?(0.013 - 0.703, n=94, last 2 years) -52%
Score Read	819	1628 99%	1822 122%	1727 111%	345 -58%	836 ?(791 - 865, n=7) 2%	1303 ?(179 - 3512, n=94, last 2 years) 59%
Score Write	1263	2198 74%	2249 78%	2099 66%	782 -38%	1125 ?(539 - 1358, n=7) -11%	1513 ?(251 - 3101, n=94, last 2 years) 20%
Score Total	2469	4667 89%	4973 101%	4658 89%	1305 -47%	2366 ?(1817 - 2644, n=7) -4%	3442 ?(545 - 7939, n=94, last 2 years) 39%
Copy ISO MB/s	1067	1476 38%		1168 9%		1191 ?(982 - 1413, n=7) 12%	1540 ?(142.7 - 3306, n=70, last 2 years) 44%
Copy Program MB/s	597	538 -10%		590 -1%		477 ?(228 - 782, n=7) -20%	511 ?(60.6 - 1087, n=70, last 2 years) -14%
Copy Game MB/s	1019	1185 16%		1148 13%		857 ?(632 - 1052, n=7) -16%	1008 ?(126.6 - 1988, n=70, last 2 years) -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		58% / 58%	84% / 83%	42% / 43%	-15% / -20%	7% / 4%	33% / 29%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2073 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1136 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 377.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1620 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1059 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.93 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.8 MB/s

Continuous power reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

由于集成了Radeon RX Vega 7 SoC显卡，惠普14s有其局限性；这款14英寸的产品并非为游戏而设计。我们的游戏表立即显示了这一点。那里的游戏是3-5年前的，最多只能在中等设置下玩。如果你认真考虑目前的游戏，你应该寻找一个替代品

见：哪些游戏能在笔记本显卡上顺利运行？

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6194 Points ∼100% +8%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5731 Points ∼93%
Average of class Subnotebook (410 - 16128, n=92, last 2 years)	5590 Points ∼90% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5255 Points ∼85% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	5118 Points ∼83% -11%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (3372 - 5731, n=37)	5016 Points ∼81% -12%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	2443 Points ∼39% -57%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (315 - 11055, n=99, last 2 years)	3994 Points ∼100% +18%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	3988 Points ∼100% +18%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3383 Points ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3325 Points ∼83% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	3253 Points ∼81% -4%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1772 - 3778, n=41)	3202 Points ∼80% -5%
HP 14s-dq1431ng Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1	1550 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (116 - 4721, n=95, last 2 years)	1274 Points ∼100% +20%
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1269 Points ∼100% +19%
HP 14s-fq1357ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1064 Points ∼84%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G3-20Y7003SGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	1009 Points ∼79% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U	985 Points ∼77% -7%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (496 - 1152, n=37)	979 Points ∼77% -8%

3DMark 11 Performance		5982 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3073 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1203 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

如果你用Ultra设置推动图形，你会遇到热限制，正如我们用Witcher 3 Ultra的测试所显示的那样。FPS保持在25分钟，然后与CPU和GPU时钟一起下降到10-11。在这里，GPU时钟从1800降到1200MHz，CPU时钟从3500降到1500MHz。这一切都发生在保持SoC的温度低于60摄氏度（140华氏度）。这对低废热很有好处，但却泄露了Radeon Vega RX的性能，然后低于平均值。

在测试中，中等程度的硬件密集型游戏和3DMarks并没有受到影响。与竞争对手相比，惠普14s的性能并不差，在某些情况下甚至领先于其他Vega RX 7s。带有iGPU Iris Xe的英特尔竞争产品大多被打败，即使有强大的Core i7 (Honor Magicbook 14i7).

惠普14s with Ryzen in review:廉价的笔记本电脑让人看到了潜力

Possible competitors in comparison

外壳和功能。可升级的子笔记本

Size comparison

连接设备

输入设备。惠普笔记本电脑被证明是弱点

显示屏：不是一个最佳的笔记本显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能。AMD的笔记本处理器没有达到最高水平

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Continuous power reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram