Notebookcheck

联想 ThinkPad X1 平板电脑简短评测

Surface的潜力…… 联想的第一台Surface风格ThinkPad设备有很多巧妙的点子。这可以带来一台平衡、实用的商务设备吗?
Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows Convertible / 2-in-1 Business
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (ThinkPad X1 Series)
Processor
Intel Core m7-6Y75 2 x 1.2 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 1000 MHz, 10.0.10586.0
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3 1866 MHz
Display
12.00 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 216 PPI, 多点触控, native pen support, INT3470, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Storage
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: 陀螺仪,加速传感器
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 13 x 289 x 216
Battery
37 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, 位于侧面, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.048 kg, Power Supply: 184 g
Price
1549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

324 mm 226 mm 12.3 mm 1.2 kg309 mm 215 mm 21 mm 1.5 kg303 mm 209 mm 13.1 mm 1.2 kg289 mm 216 mm 13 mm 1 kg292 mm 202 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg291 mm 193 mm 8 mm 1.3 kg
Top: power button
Top: power button
Bottom: cover release switch, keyboard base port
Bottom: cover release switch, keyboard base port
Left: 3.5 mm combo audio, volume buttons, Kensington Lock port
Left: 3.5 mm combo audio, volume buttons, Kensington Lock port
Right: USB Type-C, USB 3.0, Mini-DisplayPort - (Not shown: microSD card)
Right: USB Type-C, USB 3.0, Mini-DisplayPort - (Not shown: microSD card)
322.7
cd/m²
315.9
cd/m²
289.9
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
342.4
cd/m²
295.3
cd/m²
314.2
cd/m²
341.3
cd/m²
302.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
INT3470
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 342.4 cd/m² Average: 315.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.167 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 342.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 460:1 (Black: 0.744 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.33 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.36 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
12.00, 2160x1440
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
12.50, 3840x2160
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
12.00, 1920x1080
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
13.30, 3200x1800
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
12.50, 1920x1080
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
12.30, 2736x1824
Response Times
75%
-57%
152%
-72%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
36 (19, 17)
-27%
47 (16, 31)
-65%
38 (24, 14, Spikes in between)
-34%
46 (17.2, 28.8)
-62%
Response Time Black / White *
17.6 (3.6, 14)
35 (8, 27)
-99%
26 (5, 21)
-48%
27 (13, 14, Spikes in between)
-53%
31 (6, 25.2)
-76%
PWM Frequency
222.2 (49)
1000 (20)
350%
1429 (20)
543%
50 (50)
-77%
Screen
42%
7%
15%
-8%
44%
Brightness middle
342.4
437
28%
353
3%
390
14%
342
0%
389.2
14%
Brightness
315
399
27%
347
10%
352
12%
301
-4%
392
24%
Brightness Distribution
85
81
-5%
91
7%
81
-5%
76
-11%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.744
0.35
53%
0.44
41%
0.69
7%
0.393
47%
0.27
64%
Contrast
460
1249
172%
802
74%
565
23%
870
89%
1441
213%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.33
3.56
33%
6.09
-14%
3.04
43%
9.69
-82%
3.61
32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.25
9.3
-1%
7.01
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.36
2.67
50%
6.24
-16%
2.88
46%
9.27
-73%
3.8
29%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.17 101%
2.41 91%
2.43 91%
2.95 75%
2.16 102%
CCT
7671 85%
6681 97%
7238 90%
6848 95%
6010 108%
5969 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
86
51%
46
-19%
55
-4%
40.4
-29%
63
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
100
8%
71
-24%
85
-9%
97
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
59% / 49%
-25% / -5%
84% / 47%
-8% / -8%
-14% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 222.2 Hz ≤ 49 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 222.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 49 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 222.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9672 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1.08 Points ∼34%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
0.98 Points ∼31% -9%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
0.94 Points ∼30% -13%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
1.28 Points ∼41% +19%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
1.15 Points ∼37% +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
0.98 Points ∼31% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2.62 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
2.19 Points ∼4% -16%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
2.15 Points ∼4% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2.47 Points ∼5% -6%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
2.14 Points ∼4% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2.27 Points ∼5% -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
119 Points ∼44%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
104 Points ∼38% -13%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
80 Points ∼29% -33%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
100 Points ∼37% -16%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
97 Points ∼36% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
88 Points ∼32% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
234 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
196 Points ∼4% -16%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
177 Points ∼4% -24%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
214 Points ∼5% -9%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
190 Points ∼4% -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
206 Points ∼5% -12%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
698 s * ∼8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
787.585 s * ∼9% -13%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
640 s * ∼3%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
1248 s * ∼6% -95%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
774.479 s * ∼3% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
898 s * ∼4% -40%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
25.87 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
119 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
234 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.37 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4058 Points ∼59%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
3084 Points ∼45% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
4078 Points ∼60% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3472 Points ∼51% -14%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
3936 Points ∼58% -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points ∼47% -21%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3583 Points ∼31%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
2903 Points ∼25% -19%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
3362 Points ∼29% -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
3298 Points ∼28% -8%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
3263 Points ∼28% -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2968 Points ∼25% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2976 Points ∼47%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
2277 Points ∼36% -23%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
2675 Points ∼43% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
2614 Points ∼42% -12%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
2816 Points ∼45% -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼39% -18%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2976 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3583 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4058 points
Help
AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD Copy Benchmark
AS SSD Copy Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Transfer Rate Minimum: 314.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 408.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 401.9 MB/s
Access Time: 0.1 ms
Burst Rate: 114 MB/s
CPU Usage: 4 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1179 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
1007 Points ∼4% -15%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
1007 Points ∼4% -15%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
1006 Points ∼4% -15%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
677 Points ∼3% -43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1370 Points ∼6% +16%
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
1154 Points ∼2%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
1008 Points ∼2% -13%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
996 Points ∼2% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
1083 Points ∼2% -6%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
693 Points ∼1% -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1206 Points ∼2% +5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
762 Points ∼2%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
606 Points ∼1% -20%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
725 Points ∼1% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
507 Points ∼1% -33%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
511 Points ∼1% -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
810 Points ∼2% +6%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
5769 Points ∼3%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4362 Points ∼2% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
6298 Points ∼3% +9%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
4286 Points ∼2% -26%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
4441 Points ∼2% -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
6597 Points ∼3% +14%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
18749 Points ∼3%
3DMark 06 Standard
7515 points
3DMark 11 Performance
1283 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
46344 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4474 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
697 points
Help
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
6 fps ∼2%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4.67 (2.53min - 27.13max) fps ∼2% -22%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
20 fps ∼5%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
20.1 (6.67min - 32.43max) fps ∼5% +1%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
15.1 fps ∼4% -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
22.66 fps ∼6% +13%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
25 fps ∼6%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
17.37 (7.16min - 64.81max) fps ∼4% -31%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
20.1 fps ∼5% -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
26.93 fps ∼6% +8%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
44 fps ∼8%
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
33.28 (13.97min - 61.13max) fps ∼6% -24%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
39.7 fps ∼8% -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
52.42 fps ∼10% +19%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 44 25 20 6 fps
Max. Load
 33.8 °C38 °C39.2 °C 
 36.4 °C45.6 °C44.4 °C 
 40.6 °C51.2 °C50.2 °C 
Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 42.2 °C
40 °C39.6 °C35.4 °C
45.2 °C44.6 °C37.6 °C
50.2 °C53.2 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 53.2 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-22.6 °C / -40.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
Power Consumption
-34%
-4%
-6%
17%
Idle Minimum *
5.87
5.4
8%
4.5
23%
4.2
28%
2.4
59%
Idle Average *
6.05
10.2
-69%
7.7
-27%
8.4
-39%
4.6
24%
Idle Maximum *
6.13
12.5
-104%
8.3
-35%
8.9
-45%
5.6
9%
Load Average *
21.27
21.4
-1%
19.8
7%
15.9
25%
15.6
27%
Load Maximum *
23.03
24.4
-6%
20.6
11%
22.5
2%
30.7
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.27 / 1.92 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.87 / 6.05 / 6.13 Watt
Load midlight 21.27 / 23.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Battery Runtime
-27%
38%
50%
168%
35%
Reader / Idle
628
370
-41%
954
52%
1013
61%
1616
157%
791
26%
WiFi v1.3
300
243
-19%
361
20%
402
34%
760
153%
488
63%
Load
118
93
-21%
166
41%
182
54%
348
195%
138
17%
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 58min

Pros

+ 全新的支架设计方便放在腿上使用
+ 优秀的无线模组
+ 舒适易用的键盘
+ 宽阔准确的触控板,优秀的内置按键
+ 屏幕色彩绚丽,色域覆盖合理
+ 快速的系统性能
+ 单独销售的拓展模组
+ 打开后盖可以维护升级部件

Cons

- 机身仅管坚固,但抗扭折能力相比Surface Pro和其他竞争机型较弱
- 打开时不易于一只手握持
- 一般的亮度和对比度
- 在亮度设置一半以下时屏幕闪烁
- 持续负载下的处理器/显卡性能受到散热限制;几乎是立刻就会降频
- 显卡性能低于Surface Pro m3机型
- 在负载下十分烫,待机时温热
- 扬声器最多算是一般
- 电池续航低于平均水平
- 价位高
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet. Test model provided by Lenovo US.
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet. Test model provided by Lenovo US.

联想曾经是变形本市场的先驱之一,不过X1 Tablet(测试机型售价1549美元)标志着这家生产商首次为ThinkPad系列采用微软Surface式设计。这台设备旨在为商务用户提供一个除Surface Pro之外的选择,在很多方面它都做得十分成功。X1 Tablet的舒适输入设备是我们所熟悉的ThinkPad风格,提供了舒适、易用的体验。同时它作为被动散热机型,提供了出色的设备,可维护性和升级空间(这大概会受到大企业IT部门的欢迎),和一系列单独销售的模块化拓展设备,帮助提供更多功能和接口。它改进的支架设计让我们印象深刻,它相比Surface Pro更适合于放在腿上使用。

尽管有一些弱点,X1 Tablet仍然是联想对Surface Pro 4的强力挑战,感兴趣的用户在使用后可能会十分满意。

用户在选购之前也需要考虑它的一些缺点。例如,尽管它是一台ThinkPad,可开启的后盖设计和一些塑料机身结构让它相比一体式镁铝合金机身(如Surface Pro)抗弯折能力较弱。同时这台设备发热量较大(至少我们的测试机型),这可能会给长时间握持使用带来不便。尽管我们测试的是顶配的酷睿m7机型,我们对这个配置选项的实际意义有些怀疑,因为相比m3机型它十分昂贵(需额外支出350美元),而散热的限制让它相比m5和m3并没有实际的优势。最后,它的电池续航时间相比直接竞争对手也略逊一筹,甚至相比一些大尺寸主动散热的超极本也较短。

可能选择酷睿m3或m5的机型会改进以上的一些问题,而不会牺牲很多实际性能——同时也能节省不少的预算。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet - 06/02/2016 v5.1(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
61 / 80 → 76%
Weight
74 / 35-78 → 91%
Battery
82%
Display
81%
Games Performance
56 / 68 → 82%
Application Performance
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperature
76%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
67 / 85 → 79%
Average
73%
81%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Steve Schardein
Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012
contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 ThinkPad X1 平板电脑简短评测
Steve Schardein, 2016-06- 3 (Update: 2020-06- 8)