富士通 Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) 平板电脑简短评测

Name: Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Brand: Fujitsu

攻坚利器。富士通用这些辞藻来推广它的工业级平板电脑 Stylistic V535。8.3英寸机身，包含许多种通信功能，内存容量大，拥有64位的中央处理器。这些规格看群里很优秀，而实际情况却是：被动冷却功能阻碍了原本的计划。

Nino Ricchizzi, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 08/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Bay Trail Business

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Stylistic Series)

Processor

Intel Atom Z3795 4 x 1.6 - 2.4 GHz, Bay Trail-T

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 778 MHz

Memory

4 GB

, dual channel

Display

8.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive multi-touch, LG Philips LGD0000, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Bay Trail Host Bridge

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass

Networking

Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4, 4G/LTE module, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 12.5 x 227.8 x 150.1

Battery

17.7 Wh, 4425 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, 2 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP front camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus, flash

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized

Weight

550 g, Power Supply: 90 g

Price

1300 Euro

Links

Fujitsu homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2 Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA DIN A5 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	618 MBit/s +1407%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	440 MBit/s +973%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter	41 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	586 MBit/s +1263%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	577 MBit/s +1242%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter	43 MBit/s


292 cd/m²	326 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
302 cd/m²	314 cd/m²	307 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD0000 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 344 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 309.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 717:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 LG Philips LGD0000, , 1920x1080, 8.30	Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2 1280x800, 7.00	HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA OspresCR PO, , 1280x800, 8.00	Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 MS 9001, , 1920x1200, 8.00	Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 LFP14, , 1280x800, 7.00
Display			12%	3%	-13%
Display P3 Coverage	49.67		56.6 14%	50.9 2%	42.73 -14%
sRGB Coverage	72.6		80 10%	75.3 4%	64.2 -12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	51.4		58 13%	52.7 3%	44.17 -14%
Response Times			-32%	4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	29 ?(13, 16)		26 ?(9, 17) 10%	28 ?(10, 18) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	19 ?(10, 9)		33 ?(13, 20) -74%	18 ?(5, 13) 5%
PWM Frequency			378 ?(40)
Screen		-72%	9%	-28%	-16%
Brightness middle	344	540 57%	347 1%	279 -19%	561 63%
Brightness	310	498 61%	333 7%	255 -18%	528 70%
Brightness Distribution	83	85 2%	91 10%	85 2%	86 4%
Black Level *	0.48	0.32 33%	0.11 77%	0.2 58%	0.77 -60%
Contrast	717	1688 135%	3155 340%	1395 95%	729 2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.98	23.34 -683%	5.45 -83%	7.64 -156%	5.55 -86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.11		9.42 -54%	15.3 -150%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.26	6.82 -109%	10.63 -226%	6.22 -91%	7.04 -116%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.21 ^100%	1.34 ^164%	2.17 ^101%	2.46 ^89%
CCT	6106 ^106%	6334 ^103%	6404 ^101%	6798 ^96%	6323 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	47		52 11%	49 4%	41 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	72		80 11%	71 -1%	64 -11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-72% / -72%	-4% / 4%	-7% / -17%	-15% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	119 Points +213%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +132%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 Intel Core i5-4302Y	65 Points +71%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	38 Points
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356 Intel Atom Z3795	37 Points -3%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2 Intel Atom Z3795	36 Points -5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	35 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	234 Points +98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +75%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 Intel Core i5-4302Y	185 Points +57%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2 Intel Atom Z3795	134 Points +14%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356 Intel Atom Z3795	131 Points +11%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	118 Points
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	73 Points -38%

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	2976 Points +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points +113%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB	1426 Points +25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1139 Points
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1106 Points -3%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3736F, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1104 Points -3%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1139 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		1227 points
Help

	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 128 GB eMMC Flash	HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA 64 GB eMMC Flash	Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Hynix HCG8E 64 GB	Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-3%	-18%	442%
Read Seq	164.3	114.8 -30%	125.9 -23%	503 206%
Write Seq	61.1	55.3 -9%	58.4 -4%	138 126%
Read 512	156.3	118 -25%	101.9 -35%	422.7 170%
Write 512	42.27	63.5 50%	43.9 4%	137.8 226%
Read 4k	15.75	17.4 10%	13.6 -14%	34.19 117%
Write 4k	12.04	8.719 -28%	8.2 -32%	92.6 669%
Read 4k QD32	29.17	38.77 33%	26.2 -10%	364.4 1149%
Write 4k QD32	13.97	10.39 -26%	10 -28%	135.8 872%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

128 GB eMMC Flash

Sequential Read: 164.3 MB/s

Sequential Write: 61.1 MB/s

512K Read: 156.3 MB/s

512K Write: 42.27 MB/s

4K Read: 15.75 MB/s

4K Write: 12.04 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 29.17 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 13.97 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8500	305 Points +60%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795	197 Points +3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795	191 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 10 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795	181 Points -5%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3736F	175 Points -8%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795	173 Points -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		218 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	8.4	3.5

Max. Load

Idle


32.2 °C	34 °C	40.8 °C
34.2 °C	32.6 °C	42.5 °C
33.3 °C	33.9 °C	40.9 °C

Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 36 °C


42.9 °C	33.9 °C	32.3 °C
44.9 °C	34.1 °C	33 °C
42.5 °C	34 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.9 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Idle	4.9 / 7.4 / 7.5 Watt
Load	11.8 / 8.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh	Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2 N2930, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh	HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 18 Wh	Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 18.3 Wh	Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1 4302Y, HD Graphics 4200, 22 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	252	300 19%	491 95%	320 27%	246 -2%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		4h 12min

Pros

+ 坚实打造品质

+ 全高清显示

+ 许多可选配件

+ 64位Windows系统

Cons

- 空闲时发热

- 空闲时中央处理器利用率高

- 没有哑光显示

- Wi-Fi性能较差

- 电池续航短

In review: Fujitsu V535. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany.

用于高端工业要求的平板电脑。富士通Stylistic V535 平板电脑面向那些需要在恶劣环境中使用可靠平板电脑的用户。为了实现这一目标，8.3英寸平板电脑满足了多项标准，如MIL STD 810测试。此外，制造商为各种使用场景提供了附件，例如对接解决方案、坚固的框架和皮带。当我们的测试机提供多种通信选项时，Wi-Fi通信速度非常慢。可惜的是，显示效果也落后于我们的期望。远远达不到400 cd /m²的指定亮度。由于行业设备也将在室外使用，所以低亮度可能会是不购买此平板电脑的原因。

我们对该设备的性能表现也不满意:测试机通常显得被过度扩展。长时间的延迟和卡顿并不罕见。完全成熟的Windows系统对于Stylistic来说似乎太吃力了。这点也体现在温度的升高方面。在环境温度为23℃的空闲模式下，甚至可以观察到温度的升高。而容易于更换的电池和4小时以上的电池续航则是它的优势。

Stylistic V535 是一台这样的机器：适用于那些正在寻找拥有多种通信模式和开放性Windows操作系统的工业级平板电脑的用户。

无论如何，它的竞争对手都值得被考虑：松下 Toughpad 拥有一个更亮的哑光屏幕，以及安卓系统。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 - 2017-07-24 07/24/2017 v6^(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis

86%

Connectivity

39 / 65 → 59%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 88%

Games Performance

11 / 68 → 15%

Application Performance

30 / 76 → 40%

Temperature

70%

Noise

100%

Audio

30 / 91 → 33%

Camera

76 / 85 → 90%

Average

62%

73%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 富士通 Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) 平板电脑简短评测

Nino Ricchizzi, 2017-08-23 (Update: 2017-08-23)