Notebookcheck

富士通 Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) 平板电脑简短评测

Nino Ricchizzi (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 08/23/2017
Bay Trail Business

攻坚利器。富士通用这些辞藻来推广它的工业级平板电脑 Stylistic V535。8.3英寸机身,包含许多种通信功能,内存容量大,拥有64位的中央处理器。这些规格看群里很优秀,而实际情况却是:被动冷却功能阻碍了原本的计划。

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Stylistic Series)
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) - 4096 MB, Core: 778 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
, dual channel
Display
8.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive multi-touch, LG Philips LGD0000, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Bay Trail Host Bridge
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4, 4G/LTE module, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.5 x 227.8 x 150.1
Battery
17.7 Wh, 4425 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, 2 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP front camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus, flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
550 g, Power Supply: 90 g
Price
1300 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼100% +1263%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼98% +1242%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
43 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼100% +1407%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼71% +973%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
41 MBit/s ∼7%
292
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 344 cd/m² Average: 309.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 717:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | - Ø
72% sRGB (Argyll) 47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.42
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
LG Philips LGD0000, , 1920x1080, 8.3
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
1280x800, 7
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
OspresCR PO, , 1280x800, 8
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
MS 9001, , 1920x1200, 8
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
LFP14, , 1280x800, 7
Response Times
-32%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29 (13, 16)
26 (9, 17)
10%
28 (10, 18)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
19 (10, 9)
33 (13, 20)
-74%
18 (5, 13)
5%
PWM Frequency
378 (40)
Screen
-94%
18%
-13%
-26%
Brightness
310
498
61%
333
7%
255
-18%
528
70%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
91
10%
85
2%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.48
0.32
33%
0.11
77%
0.2
58%
0.77
-60%
Contrast
717
1688
135%
3155
340%
1395
95%
729
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.98
23.34
-683%
5.45
-83%
7.64
-156%
5.55
-86%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.26
6.82
-109%
10.63
-226%
6.22
-91%
7.04
-116%
Gamma
2.42 99%
2.21 109%
1.34 179%
2.17 111%
2.46 98%
CCT
6106 106%
6334 103%
6404 101%
6798 96%
6323 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
47
52
11%
49
4%
41
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
72
80
11%
71
-1%
64
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-94% / -94%
-7% / 8%
-5% / -10%
-26% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
119 Points ∼61% +213%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼45% +132%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
65 Points ∼33% +71%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points ∼19%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
37 Points ∼19% -3%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
36 Points ∼18% -5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
35 Points ∼18% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
234 Points ∼11% +98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼10% +75%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
185 Points ∼9% +57%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
134 Points ∼6% +14%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
131 Points ∼6% +11%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points ∼5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
73 Points ∼3% -38%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2976 Points ∼50% +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼41% +113%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
1426 Points ∼24% +25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼19%
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1106 Points ∼19% -3%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3736F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1104 Points ∼18% -3%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1139 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1227 points
Help
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
128 GB eMMC Flash
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
64 GB eMMC Flash
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-3%
-18%
442%
Write 4k QD32
13.97
10.39
-26%
10
-28%
135.8
872%
Read 4k QD32
29.17
38.77
33%
26.2
-10%
364.4
1149%
Write 4k
12.04
8.719
-28%
8.2
-32%
92.6
669%
Read 4k
15.75
17.4
10%
13.6
-14%
34.19
117%
Write 512
42.27
63.46
50%
43.9
4%
137.8
226%
Read 512
156.3
118
-25%
101.9
-35%
422.7
170%
Write Seq
61.07
55.32
-9%
58.4
-4%
138
126%
Read Seq
164.3
114.8
-30%
125.9
-23%
502.8
206%
128 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 164.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 61.07 MB/s
512K Read: 156.3 MB/s
512K Write: 42.27 MB/s
4K Read: 15.75 MB/s
4K Write: 12.04 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 29.17 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 13.97 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8500
305 Points ∼1% +60%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
197 Points ∼0% +3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
191 Points ∼0%
Lenovo ThinkPad 10
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
181 Points ∼0% -5%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3736F
175 Points ∼0% -8%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
173 Points ∼0% -9%
3DMark 11 Performance
218 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 8.43.5fps
Max. Load
 32.2 °C34 °C40.8 °C 
 34.2 °C32.6 °C42.5 °C 
 33.3 °C33.9 °C40.9 °C 
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 36 °C
42.9 °C33.9 °C32.3 °C
44.9 °C34.1 °C33 °C
42.5 °C34 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.9 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.435.340.42533.934.633.93134.732.234.74034.532.334.55036.43136.46337.429.837.48037.427.237.410038.527.338.512540.325.240.316040.82440.820042.123.942.125045.422.845.431548.922.148.940052.220.852.25005520.35563057.819.557.880061.41961.4100063.217.763.2125066.617.466.6160068.816.868.8200069.316.869.3250069.816.669.8315068.416.668.4400066.816.666.8500065.616.665.6630061.316.761.3800055.716.755.71000064.816.964.81250067.716.967.71600061.516.861.5SPL78.529.978.5N39.71.339.7median 61.4Fujitsu Stylistic V535median 17.4median 61.4Delta8.82.38.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.9 / 7.4 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 11.8 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
N2930, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 18 Wh
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 18.3 Wh
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
4302Y, HD Graphics 4200, 22 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
252
300
19%
491
95%
320
27%
246
-2%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
4h 12min

Pros

+ 坚实打造品质
+ 全高清显示
+ 许多可选配件
+ 64位Windows系统

Cons

- 空闲时发热
- 空闲时中央处理器利用率高
- 没有哑光显示
- Wi-Fi性能较差
- 电池续航短
In review: Fujitsu V535. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany.
In review: Fujitsu V535. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany.

用于高端工业要求的平板电脑。富士通Stylistic V535 平板电脑面向那些需要在恶劣环境中使用可靠平板电脑的用户。为了实现这一目标,8.3英寸平板电脑满足了多项标准,如MIL STD 810测试。此外,制造商为各种使用场景提供了附件,例如对接解决方案、坚固的框架和皮带。当我们的测试机提供多种通信选项时,Wi-Fi通信速度非常慢。可惜的是,显示效果也落后于我们的期望。远远达不到400 cd /m²的指定亮度。由于行业设备也将在室外使用,所以低亮度可能会是不购买此平板电脑的原因。

我们对该设备的性能表现也不满意:测试机通常显得被过度扩展。长时间的延迟和卡顿并不罕见。完全成熟的Windows系统对于Stylistic来说似乎太吃力了。这点也体现在温度的升高方面。在环境温度为23℃的空闲模式下,甚至可以观察到温度的升高。而容易于更换的电池和4小时以上的电池续航则是它的优势。

Stylistic V535 是一台这样的机器:适用于那些正在寻找拥有多种通信模式和开放性Windows操作系统的工业级平板电脑的用户。

无论如何,它的竞争对手都值得被考虑:松下 Toughpad 拥有一个更亮的哑光屏幕,以及安卓系统。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 - 07/24/2017 v6
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
0 / 80 → 
Pointing Device
Connectivity
39 / 65 → 59%
Weight
82 / 88 → 88%
Battery
76%
Display
86%
Games Performance
11 / 68 → 15%
Application Performance
30 / 76 → 40%
Temperature
70%
Noise
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Camera
76 / 85 → 90%
Average
62%
73%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 富士通 Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) 平板电脑简短评测
Nino Ricchizzi, 2017-08-23 (Update: 2017-08-23)