惠普 ElitePad 1000 G2 (F1Q77EA) 平板电脑简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics (AUO1AD8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 308 cd/m²
Contrast: 963:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.89 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.34
CCT: 6546 K
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ElitePad 1000 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E145-20BC000UGE | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP ElitePad 1000 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E145-20BC000UGE | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
128 GB eMMC Flash
Transfer Rate Minimum:
32.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
67.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
55.4 MB/s
Access Time:
0.5 ms
Burst Rate:
23.6 MB/s
CPU Usage:
10.5 %
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| HP ElitePad 1000 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 10 | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2627 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1297 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1208 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 2065 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 233 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 16363 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 18 | 7.5 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  2.7 / 4.2 / 4.4 Watt |
| Load |
5.5 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
需要一款经典的商务笔记本的替代品的用户可能会对惠普ElitePad 1000 G2感到有些失望：很少的接口，不足的性能，欠缺的功能——它的缺点可以列出很多。
这款平板产品的初衷并不是用于替代笔记本电脑。我们认为这款ElitePad是个非常便携的（辅助）设备，它最适合于会议或旅行中使用。从这个角度来看，它全面的表现是一个很大的优势：整体上，它的性能可以满足一般的办公软件使用；额外的接口可以通过连接拓展坞或转接头获得。不过如果没有这些配件，它的实际用途可能会受到很大限制。
除此之外，惠普都做得不错：除了一些细节，它的生产工艺和质量都近乎无暇；散热设计（不像其他的生产商）让系统可以在满负荷下运行。如果它会有下一代产品的话，我们希望会有更明亮的屏幕，更好的摄像头和更长一些的电池续航。它的价格可能会随着更多竞争者进入市场而下降——即使是现在售价750欧元（约987美元）、配置较低的入门型号（仅64GB eMMC存储空间，无移动网络模组）也称不上是个划算的选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
