戴尔 Venue 8 Pro 5855 平板电脑简短评测
5855-9576 (Venue Series)
Processor
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 4 x 1.4 - 2.2 GHz, Cherry Trail
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 646 MHz
Memory
4 GB
, DDR3-1600 (双通道), 板载
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel, 10点触控, native pen support, MS 9001, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cherry Trail
Storage
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB, 64 GB
Weight
377 g
Price
449 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MS 9001 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 279 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 254.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 279 cd/m²
Contrast: 1395:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.64 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.22 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
49% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
75.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
50.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
CCT: 6798 K
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 IPS, 1920x1200 | Dell Venue 8 Pro IPS, 1280x800 | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA IPS, 1280x800 | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 IPS, 1920x1200 | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 IPS, 1920x1200 | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) IPS, 1280x800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 2% | 25% | -8% | -2% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 279 | 380.2 36% | 347 24% | 207 -26% | 389 39% | 234 -16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 255 | 365 43% | 333 31% | 205 -20% | 371 45% | 229 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 85 | 86 1% | 91 7% | 89 5% | 88 4% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.2 | 0.312 -56% | 0.11 45% | 0.14 30% | 0.25 -25% | 0.22 -10% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1395 | 1219 -13% | 3155 126% | 1479 6% | 1556 12% | 1064 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.64 | 7.03 8% | 5.45 29% | 7.98 -4% | 10.28 -35% | 6.2 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.3 | 9.42 38% | 17.5 -14% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.22 | 7.12 -14% | 10.63 -71% | 8.36 -34% | 9.65 -55% | 5.9 5% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 1.59 138% | 1.34 164% | 2.21 100% | 1.25 176% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 6798 96% | 6988 93% | 6404 101% | 7768 84% | 6657 98% | 7678 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 49 | 53.88 10% | 52 6% | 41 -16% | 51 4% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 71 | 80 13% | 64 -10% | 77.7 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
3DMark | 3DMark 11 | PCMark 8 | CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 | |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 | |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 Z3745, HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -6% | -11% | 11% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39 | 40.4 -4% | 44.7 -15% | 47.6 -22% | 35.1 10% | 47 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 46.8 | 48 -3% | 48.5 -4% | 47.6 -2% | 44.5 5% | 49 -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32.4 | 32.3 -0% | 31.2 4% | 35 -8% | 26.3 19% | 30 7% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29.2 | 29.2 -0% | 31.4 -8% | 32.4 -11% | 26.3 10% | 27 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.3 / 0.32 Watt |
| Idle |  2.4 / 4 / 4.2 Watt |
| Load |
8.8 / 9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 Intel Atom Z3735G | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA Intel Atom Z3736F | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Intel Atom Z3735F | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 Intel Atom Z3745 | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -34% | -65% | -0% | 15% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.4 | 4 -67% | 5.6 -133% | 1.8 25% | 1.3 46% | 1.7 29% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4 | 6.4 -60% | 7.4 -85% | 3.2 20% | 3.2 20% | 1.7 57% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 4.2 | 6.6 -57% | 7.6 -81% | 4.4 -5% | 3.4 19% | 3.3 21% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 8.8 | 8.6 2% | 8.6 2% | 10.8 -23% | 8.6 2% | 7.4 16% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 9 | 8.1 10% | 11.5 -28% | 10.6 -18% | 10 -11% | 12.1 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855 18.3 Wh | Dell Venue 8 Pro 3845 18 Wh | HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA 18 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 39 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 8 24 Wh | Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -10% | 55% | 49% | -3% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 14.3 | 11.9 -17% | 17.8 24% | 13.8 -3% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 5.2 | 6.1 17% | 3 -42% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.3 | 8.2 55% | 10 89% | 3.6 -32% | ||
| Load (h) | 3.1 | 2.2 -29% | 4.2 35% | |||
| WiFi (h) | 6.7 | 6.1 |
Pros
+ 硬件性能高
+ 搭载Windows 10专业版
+ 优秀的机身品质
Cons
- 屏幕较暗
- 一般的电池续航
- 接口较少
戴尔的Venue 8 Pro毫无疑问是一台优秀的平板电脑。戴尔利用英特尔Cherry Tail平台中实现的性能让人惊喜。
搭配4 GB双通道内存的配置保证了相比许多竞争对手的明显性能优势。搭配Windows 10专业版和64 GB高性能eMMC闪存，Venue 8 Pro十分适合日常工作。
它的高分辨率屏幕并不出色，尽管提供了锐利的显示和丰富的色彩，它的亮度只能算一般。平板的接口十分少，用户需要购买拓展坞。而缺少键盘底座让它无法作为变形本使用，特别是如果底座中提供第二块电池，将可以缓解它电池续航时间较短的问题。
整体上，戴尔Venue 8 Pro的整体表现优秀。正在寻找小巧而高性能的Windows平板电脑的用户可能选择不多。基于酷睿m处理器的变形本，如微软Surface Pro 4，提供了更强的性能，不过相比也更笨重（当然也相比这台仅售450美元的测试机更贵）。
我们目前最大的希望就是这台新机型可以尽快上市销售。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
- 04/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
