对 Poco Pad M1 的评价
事实证明，小米 Poco Pad M1 是一款可靠的中端平板电脑，在日常使用中优势明显。做工精良、铝合金一体成型机身、12.1 英寸大屏幕液晶显示屏（色彩准确、无闪烁、自适应 120 Hz），使其成为媒体消费和日常工作的好伙伴。
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 的性能确保了大部分操作的流畅性，并在比较中脱颖而出，而包括 33 瓦充电在内的出色电池续航能力则进一步强调了它适合日常使用。
四扬声器的音效一般、室外亮度平庸、摄像头功能一般，这些都必须接受。积极的一面是，Wi-Fi 6E、microSD 支持、耳机插孔、手写笔兼容性以及较长的更新时间（虽然更新时间不一致）都值得注意。
Pros
Cons
- $339.99XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 12.1" 2.5K Octa Core 4 Speakers Global ROM 12000mAh Bluetooth Wi-Fi 6 8MP Model 2509ARPBDG (Blue, 256GB + 8GB)
- $339.50XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) 12.1" 2.5K Octa Core 4 Speakers Global ROM 12000mAh Bluetooth Wi-Fi 6 8MP Model 2509ARPBDG (Gray, 256GB + 8GB)
- $17.99Ibywind for Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro/Redmi Pad 2 Pro/Poco Pad/Poco Pad M1 Screen Protector,2 Pack,9H Hardness Tempered Glass with Alignment Frame,Full Coverage,Bubble Free,Fingerprint Unlock,Scratch Resistant
Poco Pad M1 是红米 Pad 2 Pro 的姊妹机型。 红米 Pad 2 Pro在数据表上非常相似。我们的测试澄清了两者之间的差异，以及哪款小米平板电脑更值得购买。
规格小米 Poco Pad M1
外壳和功能 - Poco Pad M1 配备 microSD 和音频插孔
小米 Poco Pad M1 有蓝色和灰色两种颜色，厚度为 7.5 毫米。它重 610 克，并不轻巧，但双手握持时几乎感觉不到重量。这款平板电脑采用铝合金一体成型机身，表面光滑整洁，给人以坚固耐用的印象。
Pad M1 仅配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 内部 UFS 2.2 存储空间。与红米 Pad 2 Pro 不同，Poco 平板电脑缺少 5G 选项，但它也支持 microSD 并配有音频插孔。
缺少 NFC 和振动马达也不是问题。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
通信和操作 - 配备 Wi-Fi 6E 和面部识别功能的 Poco 平板电脑
小米 Poco Pad M1 仅支持 Wi-Fi 6，但与 红米 Pad 2 Pro一样，在我们的测试中也显示支持 6 GHz 频段。数据传输速率也相应较高。
Pad M1 的触摸屏功能完善，可同时识别多达十个输入，还可与选配的 Poco 智能笔配合使用。如果你已经拥有一支红米智能笔，也可以使用它。
除了 PIN 和密码保护外，还可通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，以确保安全，不过只能存储两张面孔。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - Poco Pad M1 的简短更新
Poco Pad M1 采用无塑料包装，也是完全收缩包装。遗憾的是，小米没有提供任何关于产品可持续性的信息。
根据小米社区中的一个帖子，这款平板电脑将在 2029 年 9 月之前接受更新。直到 2029 年 9 月。在 EPREL 数据库中，该产品的更新期限为五年，至少到 2030 年。
摄像头 - 前后均为 800 万像素
就其价格范围而言，小米 Poco Pad M1 拍出的照片相当不错，但难以与相当现代的智能手机相提并论。不过，它的性能足以满足视频会议和简单文档记录的需要。
视频可以以 30 FPS 的 720p 或全高清格式双向录制。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 采用无闪烁液晶屏的 Poco Pad
Poco Pad M1 的液晶显示屏不仅对角线长达 12.1 英寸（30.7 厘米），尺寸非常大，而且在测试中的测量值也给人留下了深刻印象。色彩还原准确，相当低的黑阶带来了清晰的对比度。
面板不使用 PWM。可惜只支持一种 HDR 标准。系统可在 30 至 120 Hz 之间调节刷新率。
只有在室外，亮度并不总是足够，而且显示屏反光很厉害。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 620 cd/m²
Contrast: 1676:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6615 K
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 TFT-LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro TFT-LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Lenovo Idea Tab Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | -41% | -157% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 620 | 582 -6% | 633 2% | 537 -13% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 578 | 553 -4% | 622 8% | 514 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 87 1% | 95 10% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.37 | 0.33 11% | 0.54 -46% | 0.35 5% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1676 | 1764 5% | 1172 -30% | 1534 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 0.8 27% | 1.81 -65% | 5.24 -376% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.9 | 2.2 -16% | 2.98 -57% | 10.83 -470% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.6 -60% | 2.5 -150% | 4.9 -390% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.21 100% | 1.934 114% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 6615 98% | 6294 103% | 6853 95% | 7637 85% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8039 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.474 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.45 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.95 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间--Poco Pad M1 依靠骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器
Poco Pad M1 的 骁龙 7S 第 4 代骁龙 7S Gen 4 定位中端，能让平板电脑流畅运行。虽然它在使用复杂应用程序时也会达到极限，但在同类产品中可以明显脱颖而出。
表面温度始终保持在安全范围内，即使在压力测试中，SoC 也不会出现节流现象。
尽管有四个支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器，但音效相当一般，中等音量时已显得有些空洞。
电池续航能力非常出色。电池容量为 12,000 毫安时，充电功率高达 33 瓦，2 小时 45 分钟即可充满（50%：77 分钟；80%：132 分钟）。
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (522205 - 2274547, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro | Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -15% | -7% | 58% | -5% | 45% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 999.46 | 983.31 -2% | 526.82 -47% | 1990.9 99% | 909 ? -9% | 1868 ? 87% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 997.79 | 915.09 -8% | 527.26 -47% | 1645.1 65% | 733 ? -27% | 1422 ? 43% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 202.19 | 150.42 -26% | 271.5 34% | 249.4 23% | 224 ? 11% | 252 ? 25% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 230.68 | 180.77 -22% | 304.01 32% | 332 44% | 247 ? 7% | 287 ? 24% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
小米 Poco Pad M1 是一款做工精良、经久耐用的中端平板电脑，配备 120 Hz 无闪烁大显示屏，性能稳定，但在音效、摄像头和舒适性功能方面尤其打了折扣。
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- 01/30/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 80.7%  | Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $339.99 XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi... 2. $339.50 XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi... 3. $17.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi Redmi Pad... | 610 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI TFT-LCD |
2. 81.2%  | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $309.50 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... 2. $266.00 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... 3. $260.00 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... List Price: 300€ | 610 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI TFT-LCD |
3. 78.9%  | Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $248.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Plus - Light... 2. $321.76 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 3. $19.88 Vakarey for Lenovo Idea Tab ... List Price: 299 Euro | 530 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
4. 78.4%  | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: $309.99 List Price: 269€ | 482 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 11.00" 1920x1200 206 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
