Notebookcheck Logo
Poco M7 Pro 5G smartphone review (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)

支持长时间更新的入门级产品 - 小米 Poco M7 Pro 5G 评测

不到 200 欧元的超亮 OLED 屏幕

尽管价格低廉,但 Poco M7 Pro 的性价比却令人印象深刻。3.5 毫米耳机插孔和 microSD 卡插槽以及 IP 认证,这些功能在这个价位的手机中几乎闻所未闻,但在这里,它们都是标配。AMOLED 显示屏带有 PWM 调光功能,性能之强在同类手机中令人惊讶。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

判决

Poco M7 Pro 是一个真正的惊喜--而且是一个令人愉快的惊喜。这款小米的入门级手机拥有长达六年的软件更新,其运行性能几乎与Galaxy A26 相当,而且还具有一些优势,如现代的设计、更亮的带 PWM 调光功能的 OLED 面板和更长的电池续航时间。就这个价位而言,前后摄像头的质量也出人意料地不错。

但是,小米在其 Poco 设备上做了哪些妥协呢?入门级联发科 SoC 让人对 M7 Pro 的预算根基毫无疑问,其日常性能始终无法让人感到精致。虽然小米承诺提供长期的软件支持,但这款手机搭载的是过时版本的Android 和第一代 HyperOS,这样的组合并不能让人对它的未来充满信心。

不过,如果你不为没有超广角摄像头或 eSIM 支持而感到失望,这款智能手机还是物有所值的。作为替代,几乎相同的Redmi Note 14 5G 也值得一看。

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 明亮的 OLED 面板,带 PWM 调光功能
+ 功能齐全
+ 软件更新周期长
+ 发热量极低

Cons

- 只有 Wi-Fi 5
- 低性能 SoC
- Android 版本过时
- 不支持 eSIM

价格和供应情况

Poco M7 Pro 5G 的建议零售价(RRP)从 240 欧元(约合 260 美元)起,但它已经可以在部分零售商(包括亚马逊)以低于 200 欧元(约合 215 美元)的厂商早鸟价买到。

这款手机有三种颜色可供选择:月光尘埃、薰衣草霜和橄榄暮色。

Amazon Logo
$11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 6.67"(2 Pack),9H Hardness Tempered Glass,With 1Pc Camera Lens Protector,1Pc Back Carbon Fiber Film,Easy to Install
  • $8.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
  • $7.99
    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Screen Protector Tempered Glass,Case Friendly [Hardness 9H ][High definition] [Anti Scratch]

小米推出的 Poco M7 Pro 5G 是一款入门级智能手机,旨在将性能、功能和令人印象深刻的拍照功能融为一体。采用 密度 7025这款 Poco 设备为摄影爱好者提供了索尼 IMX882 传感器、大光圈和光学防抖功能。microSD 卡插槽和 3.5 毫米耳机插孔的加入也反映了当今智能手机市场已基本消失的一系列硬件功能。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 规格

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Poco M7 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
IMG BXM-8-256
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 2160 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.99 x 162.4 x 75.7
Battery
5110 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5, OIS, 26 mm, Videos @1080p/​30fps) + 2 MPix (f/2.4, depth sensor), Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/​60fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, USB cable, info material, sim tool, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.958W/​kg Head, 0.993W/​kg Body; HDR: HD10, HLG, Dolby Vision, BT: SBC, AAC, LDAC, ASHA, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 1.0, LHDC 2.0, LHDC 3.0, LHDC 4.0, LHDC 5.0, LC3, Auracast, Charging: QC 2.0, PD2.0, PD3.0, PPS. QC 3.0, QC 3+, QC 4, QC 4+, UFCS, MI FC 2.0, fanless, waterproof
Weight
190 g
Price
240 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 - 保护小米手机

Poco M7 Pro 5G 的颜色选择
Poco M7 Pro 5G 的颜色选择

Poco M7 Pro 厚度仅为 8 毫米,重 190 克,是市场上最轻的智能手机之一。不过,重量轻也带来了一些手感上的妥协:小米手机既没有采用高级玻璃后壳,也没有采用金属边框。尽管如此,它拿在手里的感觉并不廉价,磨砂表面也有助于防止指纹沾染。

Poco M7 Pro 还获得了官方 IP64 等级认证,确保机身既能防尘又能防水溅。

在正面,小米采用了康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃。外形尺寸与前代产品几乎相同但边框略微纤薄,屏占比提高到 87.4%。整体做工扎实,面板缝隙干净整齐。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机 图片来源:Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希

尺寸比较

166.1 mm 77.2 mm 8.3 mm 205 g164 mm 77.5 mm 7.7 mm 200 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.4 mm 185.5 g162.4 mm 75.7 mm 7.99 mm 190 g162.4 mm 75.7 mm 7.99 mm 190 g161.1 mm 74.95 mm 7.98 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Poco M7 Pro 限于 USB 2.0

Poco M7 Pro 有 8 或 12 GB LPDDR4X 内存可选,并配备 256 或 512 GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。内存最高可扩展至 12 GB,根据小米的说法,在最佳条件下最多可同时运行 42 个应用程序。不过,这种扩展是通过内部存储中的交换文件实现的,运行速度明显慢于实际内存。

正如这个价位段的产品所预期的那样,这款中端智能手机配备了一个基本的 USB 2.0 端口,不支持有线视频输出。不过,它支持 USB-OTG,以及 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。在我们使用 三星固态硬盘 T7在使用三星固态硬盘 T7 进行的文件复制测试中,USB 端口的传输速度缓慢,仅为 24 MB/s。

尽管使用了 OLED 显示技术,但 Poco M7 Pro 并不提供始终在线的通知显示功能。不过,它确实包含了一系列附加功能,如 NFC、Miracast 和红外线发射器,使小米手机可以用作兼容设备的遥控器。

机箱左侧
机箱左侧
机箱右侧(按钮:音量、电源)
机箱右侧(按钮:音量、电源)
机箱底部(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、SIM/MicroSD 托盘)
机箱底部(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、SIM/MicroSD 托盘)
机箱顶部(3.5 毫米耳机插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风)
机箱顶部(3.5 毫米耳机插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风)

microSD 读卡器

内部 UFS 存储空间可通过混合插槽的 microSD 卡扩展至 2 TB。M7 Pro 还支持 exFAT 文件系统。

在我们的测试中,数据传输速率明显高于 Poco M6 Pro.与 Angelbird AV PRO V60 搭配使用时,我们测得的传输速度接近 60 MB/s。Poco M7 Pro 在 CPD 测试中也取得了优异的成绩。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.86 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
54.66 MB/s -7%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
36.9 MB/s -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
30.6 MB/s -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s -49%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s -62%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.1 (26.6-46.5)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (28.8-46.3)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.6 (14.8-83.3)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.4 (40.3-78.4)

软件 - Poco M7 Pro 预装Android 14

Poco M7 Pro 预装了Android 14 和较旧的 HyperOS 1。预装的广告推送通知可能是个小麻烦,但可以在隐私和安全设置中禁用。

Poco M 系列的新优势之一是其长期的软件支持。M7 Pro 已经符合欧盟要求制造商为新智能手机和平板电脑提供至少五年软件更新的指令。

根据小米德国公司的声明,这款入门级手机将在六年内收到安全补丁和四个主要的Android 更新。不过,在测试时,这些补丁已经过时,最新的补丁是 2025 年 2 月的。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机图片来源
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机图片来源
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机图片来源

可持续性

小米公司强调,其所有智能手机普遍使用回收材料和生物基高分子材料以及再生塑料。不过,该公司并未提供有关所用材料、回收率或二氧化碳消耗数据的具体细节。Poco M7 Pro 的包装似乎不使用塑料,但使用了保护膜来保护设备。

根据新的欧盟指令理论上,Poco M7 Pro 的更换部件可使用长达七年。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 5 的小米智能手机

在连接性方面,Poco M7 Pro 的优势和劣势并存。这款入门级手机支持 5G 标准的移动数据,提供广泛的频率范围。4G 频段支持在同价位手机中也相当出色,德语地区的所有相关频率都包括在内。

不过,小米手机的 WiFi 5 标准缺乏面向未来的功能,只有一个发射和接收通道(1x1 MIMO)。在使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中,我们记录到的速度仅为 370 Mbps 左右。好的一面是,数据传输速率在整个测试过程中基本保持稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
351 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
354 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
348 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼48%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼53%
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
614 (min: 224) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1434 (min: 1076) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
357 (min: 59) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
390 (min: 366) MBit/s ∼54%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
348 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
728 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
718 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1433 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1363 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼95%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø373 (359-383)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (59-385)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (359-367)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø377 (366-387)
户外位置跟踪
户外位置跟踪
室内位置跟踪
室内位置跟踪

为了测试 Poco M7 Pro 定位跟踪的准确性,我们用它进行了一次散步,并将记录的数据与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。定位非常准确,精度为 1 米。不过,信号强度很弱。Poco 手机的路线数据偏差也相当明显。由于 Poco M7 Pro 只支持单频 GNSS,因此往往会缩短距离。尽管如此,车载导航仍然可以正常使用。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 对比 Garmin Venu 2
Poco M7 Pro 5G 对比 Garmin Venu 2

手机功能和语音质量 - 双卡双待的小米手机

Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机

Poco M7 Pro 的语音质量令人印象深刻。没有恼人的噪音,通话者的声音传输清晰。在 5G 和 4G 网络上进行语音通话时,支持 VoNR 和 VoLTE。此外,VoWi-Fi 支持通过 Wi-Fi 进行通话。

如果需要,Poco M7 Pro 可以配备两个 nanoSIM 卡插槽,实现 5G 双卡双待功能,但这意味着要牺牲存储扩展能力。

摄像头 - Poco M7 Pro 使用 OIS

与 Poco M7 Pro 自拍
与 Poco M7 Pro 自拍

Poco M7 Pro 的前置摄像头采用 2000 万像素 OmniVision 广角镜头,能在光线充足的条件下捕捉到许多细节。曝光效果也不错。遗憾的是,该传感器仅支持每秒 30 帧的 1080p 视频。这一限制也适用于主摄像头,这令人失望,因为同类机型 X7 Pro 的索尼 IMX882 能够拍摄 4K60 视频。

好的一面是,Poco M7 Pro 的 5000 万像素主摄像头配备了 f/1.5 光圈和光学防抖功能。在日常使用中,它能拍摄出令人印象深刻的日光照片,清晰度均衡,动态范围高。不过,边缘会出现明显的模糊。令人惊讶的是,这款入门级手机在弱光环境下的表现也很出色。大光圈可让大量光线进入相对较小的 1/1.95 传感器,从而获得出色的照明效果和相对较低的模糊度。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20x
20x

除了主摄像头外,Poco 手机几乎不提供其他功能。它只支持数码变焦,在拍照模式下最多可放大 20 倍,但质量很低。小米还在这款入门级智能手机上省略了超广角镜头或微距摄像头。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下,我们分析了色彩表现与实际参考色彩的比较。Poco M7 Pro 显示出明显的偏差,但总体而言,就其价格范围而言,相机软件对色彩的计算还是相当不错的。在 ColorChecker Passport 上看不到明显的色彩保真度异常值(>15)。

ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G: 6.96 ∆E min: 2.51 - max: 11.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
26 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
53 ∆E
22 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
58.8 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
46 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G: 37.68 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 58.82 ∆E

配件和保修 - Poco-Phone 不含充电器

Poco M7 Pro 充电器必须单独购买
Poco M7 Pro 充电器必须单独购买

这款入门级手机随附一条 USB-C 数据线、一个保护套和一个 SIM 卡工具。此外,还预装了屏幕保护膜。不过,缺少配套的 45 瓦充电器。

手机保修在德国的保修期为 12 个月,可通过内部保险套餐延长保修期,涵盖意外损坏和盗窃,起价为 39 欧元(建议零售价)。

输入设备和操作 - Poco M7 Pro 响应迅速

6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏上的输入可精确记录到触摸屏的所有边缘。手机支持高达 240 Hz 的触摸采样率,在 Game Turbo 模式下更可提高到 2160 Hz。小米专有的 Wet-Touch 技术还允许在潮湿或湿手的情况下进行操作,在日常使用中效果出奇的好。

得益于高达 120 Hz 的高刷新率,系统可以流畅地呈现动画,虽然 联发科 SoC有时会出现延迟。触觉反馈也不是 Poco M7 Pro 的强项。振动马达产生的振动很不明显,而且声音比较大。

在生物识别解锁方面,有一个显示屏内传感器,最多支持五个手指。在测试中,小米手机的光学指纹识别功能运行可靠,但速度不快。此外,还有一个不安全的基于人工智能的面部识别功能,依靠前置摄像头进行二维识别。

Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机
Poco M7 Pro 5G 测试智能手机

显示屏 - 120 赫兹的小米手机

OLED 显示屏使用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏使用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个矩阵由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

小米为其入门级手机配备了三星提供的 AMOLED 面板,具有 1080p 分辨率和 8 位色深。该面板支持 120 Hz 的最大刷新率,可自适应降至 60 Hz。根据规格表,它的峰值亮度为 2,100 尼特。此外,它还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证(无闪烁、低蓝光和昼夜节律友好)。

在实际使用中,与日常亮度相关的 APL18 模式产生了 1,163 cd/m² 的出色结果,非常接近小米宣称的 1,200 尼特等级。在显示 HDR 内容时,亮度甚至可以更高,Poco M7 Pro 可以达到 2,118 cd/m²。该显示屏支持 HDR10+、杜比视界(Dolby Vision)和高动态范围视频内容的 HLG。

1138
cd/m²
1129
cd/m²
1144
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
1157
cd/m²
1162
cd/m²
1153
cd/m²
1160
cd/m²
1163
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1163 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1150.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1157 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G75
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-24%
-101%
-5%
-51%
2%
Brightness middle
1157
1147
-1%
735
-36%
1156
0%
947
-18%
1016
-12%
Brightness
1151
1146
0%
731
-36%
1150
0%
946
-18%
1016
-12%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
99
2%
98
1%
95
-2%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.6
-45%
3.8
-245%
1.1
-0%
2.53
-130%
1.1
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
3.7
-54%
5.8
-142%
3.1
-29%
4.91
-105%
1.9
21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
2.3
-44%
4
-150%
1.6
-0%
2.1
-31%
1.3
19%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
1.98 111%
2.22 99%
2.237 98%
2.28 96%
CCT
6622 98%
6368 102%
6628 98%
6304 103%
6733 97%
6420 101%
Contrast
2059

* ... smaller is better

为了控制屏幕亮度,Poco M7 Pro 采用了 PWM 调制方式,这可能会导致屏幕闪烁。我们测得的高频率为 952 Hz,与 Poco 手机的规格表(960 Hz)一致。除了高频 PWM 调光外,用示波器测量的调制深度约为 14%,相对来说比较养眼。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 13.77 %
Secondary Frequency: 952 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

固定变焦和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦,但这是缩放造成的。在信息框中,可以看到最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

我们使用分析软件 Calman 检查色彩校准的偏差。在 "标准 "配置文件中,单个颜色的差异几乎不明显,测得的 DeltaE 值也很低。HyperOS 的设置选项也足够全面。有三种颜色配置文件可供选择,每种都有可调节的色温设置。

色彩准确度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.743 ms rise
↘ 0.726 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9665 ms rise
↘ 0.955 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

小米手机在户外给人留下了深刻的印象。即使在阳光直射下,显示内容依然清晰可见。不过,如果你不使用亮度传感器,就应该注意亮度被限制在 473 cd/m²。在可视角度方面没有什么可批评的。即使在急剧倾斜的情况下,OLED 面板的色彩也依然鲜艳。

性能 - Poco M7 Pro 依靠联发科技术

Poco M7 Pro 配备了 密度 7025-Ultra,尽管贴有 "Ultra "标签,但其性能并没有真正超越联发科 SoC 的标准版本。事实上 摩托 G55在 Geekbench 测试中的表现略胜一筹。不过,小米手机在同价位的基准测试中表现相当不错。手机 Dimensity 7300Poco X7的 Dimensity 7300 性能更强,但单核性能的差异并不是特别大。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=206, last 2 years)
1544 Points +61%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1011 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1008 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (947 - 1013, n=3)
973 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
959 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=206, last 2 years)
4400 Points +91%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2887 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2857 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (2299 - 2370, n=3)
2324 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
2299 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points -13%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +160%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
620511 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
583142 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
500994 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (469182 - 500994, n=2)
485088 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
421861 Points -16%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years)
13984 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
13807 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13404 Points +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (10629 - 13548, n=3)
11770 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
11134 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points -5%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
737 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
646 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
597 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (585 - 597, n=2)
591 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
568 Points -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=156, last 2 years)
6777 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4829 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4545 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
3875 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (3678 - 3875, n=2)
3777 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3041 Points -22%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=156, last 2 years)
10615 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9006 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8316 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
7621 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (7104 - 7621, n=2)
7363 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6208 Points -19%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=156, last 2 years)
7498 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7059 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
5276 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (4735 - 5276, n=2)
5006 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4554 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3732 Points -29%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=156, last 2 years)
19261 Points +371%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +110%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
7298 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7019 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
4087 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (4058 - 4087, n=2)
4073 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2959 Points -28%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=156, last 2 years)
1611 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1425 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
1367 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (1341 - 1367, n=2)
1354 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1320 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1247 Points -9%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +184%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9416 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9164 Points +43%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
6394 Points
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
6320 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (5946 - 6394, n=2)
6170 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points -7%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
27735 Points +2611%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
1023 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (1019 - 1023, n=2)
1021 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
729 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
595 Points -42%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
499 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=43, last 2 years)
443 Points -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (245 - 499, n=2)
372 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
245 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
211 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
194 Points -61%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
137 Points -73%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=42, last 2 years)
986 Points +102%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
489 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (276 - 489, n=2)
383 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
359 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
276 Points -44%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
212 Points -57%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
136 Points -72%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=42, last 2 years)
1660 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
967 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (187 - 967, n=2)
577 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
516 Points -47%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
512 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
397 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
187 Points -81%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=37, last 2 years)
908 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (n=1)
67.3 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=46, last 2 years)
4075 Points +1426%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
328 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288
267 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (212 - 267, n=2)
240 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points -21%

袩褉芯懈蟹胁芯写褋褌胁械薪薪褘械 img bxm-8-256 GPUPoco M7 Pro 的 GPU 性能明显弱于 Galaxy A26Poco X7.事实上,Poco X7 在 GFXBench 中的每秒帧数比同类机型高出一倍多,这要归功于它的 Mali-G615 MP2.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +71%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +48%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +59%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps +55%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
74 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +27%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +25%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps +16%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +66%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +60%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +49%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +63%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +56%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +44%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -19%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +61%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +73%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +117%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps +88%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +58%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +47%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +100%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -30%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps +124%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.8 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4486 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3437 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3423 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5024 Points +122%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2440 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2277 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2265 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4894 Points +99%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2634 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2462 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2455 Points

浏览网页时,没有什么大的意外。网站加载速度相当快,不过图片在滚动时有时需要一些时间才能显示出来。浏览器基准测试的结果也很稳定,符合我们对入门级手机的预期。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
126.402 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
121.837 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (108.8 - 111.1, n=2)
109.9 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
108.784 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
73.5 Points -32%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=147, last 2 years)
168.6 runs/min +51%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
127 runs/min +13%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
112 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 runs/min -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min -4%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
105 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
65.46 runs/min -42%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +69%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
8.27 runs/min +11%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
7.45 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6.79 - 7.45, n=2)
7.12 runs/min -4%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
6.97 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -9%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
140 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
116 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
107 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Chrome 122)
81 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years)
43062 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
38939 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
37483 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
36734 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (34723 - 36734, n=3)
35943 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
22678 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
1932.3 ms * -71%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -21%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -16%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G (Chrome 135)
1131.86 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (1131 - 1132, n=2)
1131 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -0%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
1077.4 ms * +5%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
975.3 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

在速度方面,Poco 手机的 UFS 存储系统性能稳定。作为一款入门级手机,Androbench 基准测试的结果完全可以接受。

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GSamsung Galaxy A26 5GXiaomi Poco X7Motorola Moto G75Xiaomi Poco M6 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-6%
-52%
-20%
5%
-5%
-11%
56%
Sequential Read 256KB
987.81
950.62
-4%
528.54
-46%
947.4
-4%
1023.1
4%
973.53
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
943.43
792.56
-16%
251.43
-73%
915.23
-3%
868.4
-8%
910.9
-3%
734 ?(369 - 943, n=42)
-22%
Random Read 4KB
243.98
257.91
6%
219.57
-10%
100.16
-59%
285.3
17%
236.72
-3%
Random Write 4KB
265.26
245.16
-8%
61.8
-77%
226.88
-14%
279.5
5%
228.61
-14%

游戏 - 小米手机不是游戏手机

为了更好地评估内置 IMG GPU我们与GameBench 合作,对 Play Store 中的两款游戏进行了测试。.我们测量了每款游戏的精确帧率。

Poco M7 Pro 确实具备游戏能力,至少在最低设置下是如此。在《源氏冲击》中,我们测得的帧数约为 35 FPS,而在《PUBG Mobile》中,平均帧数约为 40 FPS。然而,在更高的图形设置下,Poco 手机就会陷入困境,无法再获得流畅的帧率。对于大逃杀游戏,甚至无法解锁高细节设置(UHD)。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø35.2 (21-60)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø23.8 (7-32)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.7 (28-41)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø30 (29-31)

排放 - Poco M7 Pro 保持凉爽

温度

Poco M7 Pro 能很好地控制外壳的表面温度。因为 IMG BXM-8-256由于与 Vulkan 不兼容,不支持 3DMark 压力测试,GFXBench 电池测试也不提供结果,因此我们无法提供节流的精确值。与其他入门级 SoC 一样,Poco M7 Pro 的节流应该小于 2%。

Max. Load
 41.4 °C40.6 °C36.2 °C 
 40 °C38.5 °C35.9 °C 
 40.7 °C39.9 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
36.1 °C38.2 °C39.8 °C
35.6 °C37.1 °C39.2 °C
34.7 °C36.6 °C37.3 °C
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

发言人

小米入门级智能手机配备了两个扬声器,低音和中音都很突出。考虑到价格,其音质令人印象深刻。对于那些追求更丰富低音的用户,3.5 毫米耳机插孔可用于有线聆听,不过它的噪音水平相当高,为 42 dBFS。此外,还可通过蓝牙 5.3 串流无线音频,蓝牙 5.3 支持多种编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.839.92528.137.93124.439.64020.541.55029.544.36318.940.68017.743.110015.844.412513.445.116013.946.720011.248.325010.452.431511.757.140010.158.75008.864.66308.967.78009.272.510009.878.9125010.382.5160010.881.2200011.883.7250011.383.331501282.340001375.7500012.675.6630012.879.2800012.975.51000013.374.21250013.568.71600013.663.8SPL23.891.9N0.585.8median 11.8median 74.2Delta1.511.335.838.138.239.332.932.733.531.537.53827.12821.119.92424.721.727.419.538.616.847.61356.615.561.714.164.415.764.920.360.622.668.919.27716.174.114.376.812.375.61570.619.968.721.76624.173.523.275.426.973.925.76919.169.82459.833.585.21.761.6median 19.5median 68.747.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5GMotorola Moto G75
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G75 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 小米智能手机瞬间充满电

耗电量

Poco M7 Pro 的聚合物锂离子电池容量为 5,110 mAh,充电功率可达 45 瓦。充电时间约为 60 分钟。遗憾的是,这款入门级手机不支持无线充电,但支持多种快速充电协议。无论是在空闲状态还是在负载情况下,功耗都很低。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.14 / 1.3 / 1.34 Watt
Load midlight 2.96 / 8.18 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-39%
-1%
-37%
-16%
-6%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.15
-1%
1.17
-3%
1.09
4%
0.8
30%
1
12%
1.145 ?(1.14 - 1.15, n=2)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.55
-19%
1.94
-49%
1.28
2%
1.1
15%
1.19
8%
1.425 ?(1.3 - 1.55, n=2)
-10%
Idle Maximum *
1.34
1.57
-17%
2.03
-51%
1.31
2%
1.5
-12%
1.33
1%
1.455 ?(1.34 - 1.57, n=2)
-9%
Load Average *
2.96
3.87
-31%
4.31
-46%
3.25
-10%
8.7
-194%
6.27
-112%
3.42 ?(2.96 - 3.87, n=2)
-16%
Load Maximum *
8.18
7.66
6%
11.79
-44%
8.62
-5%
10.1
-23%
7.19
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.35 (1.069-6.18)
Motorola Moto G75 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.48 (0.817-7.45)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.05 (1.015-1.394)
Motorola Moto G75 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.778-2.26)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.07 (2.77-4)
Motorola Moto G75 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.68 (9.16-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.05 (1.015-1.394)
Motorola Moto G75 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.778-2.26)

电池寿命

Poco M7 Pro 的电池续航能力令人印象深刻。在无休止的视频循环测试中,通信模块的能耗通常较高,但并不明显。续航时间为 23 小时,比我们的 Wi-Fi 电池测试多出约 5.5 小时,这两项测试都是在校准显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下进行的。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 44min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 9min
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
-18%
0%
13%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2084
1800
-14%
1987
-5%
3022
45%
H.264
1376
1019
-26%
1122
-18%
1332
-3%
WiFi v1.3
1046
773
-26%
739
-29%
1049
0%
1174
12%
845
-19%
Load
309
361
17%
249
-19%
302
-2%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Poco M7 Pro 的更新支持时间出奇地长,因此 200 欧元(约合 215 美元)以下的价格几乎毫无悬念。

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G - 05/16/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
45 / 69 → 66%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
7 / 55 → 13%
Application Performance
58 / 85 → 68%
AI Performance
31%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
67%
Average
63%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
78%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.2%

可比较的替代品

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 支持长时间更新的入门级产品 - 小米 Poco M7 Pro 5G 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-05-20 (Update: 2025-05-20)