Notebookcheck

小米Pad 5平板电脑评论 -Android- 最便宜的iPad的替代品

强大的中产阶级。 大量的性能,120赫兹的显示屏和Apple iPad Air风格的别致设计。11英寸的小米Pad 5以400欧元(约450美元)的价格提供所有这些,因此是Apple iPad 2021的一个有趣的替代品,后者是这个价格范围内最好的平板电脑之一。我们将在审查中发现,Pad 5是否真的能与Apple 的对手竞争。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

廉价和便宜或昂贵和非常好的装备 - 因为许多平板电脑的范围在这些极端之间,当涉及到中档模型时,没有太多的选择。然而,现在这种情况随着小米Pad 5的推出而增加,它的售价为400欧元(约450美元)。

11英寸的小米Pad 5配备了快速的 骁龙 860并得到6GB内存和128GB存储的支持。其他功能包括一个名义上500cd/m²的明亮IPS显示屏,分辨率为2560 x 1600像素,帧率为120赫兹。此外,还有4个扬声器和一个8720毫安时的电池电池。

我们将在评论中了解Pad 5与竞争对手的比较。

Xiaomi Pad 5 (Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive, IPS, WQHD+, 500 Nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.85 x 254.69 x 166.25
Battery
8720 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix videos up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 22.5W Charger, USB-C cable, Quick start guide, Warranty card , MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
511 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.6 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5
SD 860, Adreno 640
511 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
88.4 %
09/2021
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
SD 865, Adreno 650
485 g7.25 mm10.95"2560x1600
83.4 %
10/2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
655 g7.9 mm11.00"2000x1200
83.1 %
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
467 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
88.7 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
515 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600

保护壳 - Design modelApple iPad Air

在价格方面,小米Pad 5接近于 Apple iPad 2021,但其设计是基于更昂贵的平板电脑,如 Apple iPad Air 4.然而,它的重量为511克(约1.1磅),比Apple 竞争对手要重一些,而且只有不到7毫米(约0.28英寸),它不太薄。

小米Pad 5有珍珠白和宇宙灰两种颜色,它的外壳与它的姐妹机型相同 小米Pad 5 Pro.加分项是坚固的铝制框架和带有丝质表面处理的哑光后盖,这使它看起来和感觉都很高端。与Pad 5 Pro不同的是,音量摇杆和电源按钮没有指纹传感器,它们被牢牢地固定在机身上,并有一个清晰的压力点。底部有一个磁力基座,用于安装可选的键盘盖。

与小米Pad 5 Pro相同的地方也在机箱的减分名单上。Pad 5缺乏大猩猩玻璃作为面板保护,也没有IP等级,背面只是用塑料制成。

Size comparison

256.8 mm 169 mm 7.9 mm 655 g254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 511 g254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 515 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 7.25 mm 485 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 487 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g

设备 - 只提供WiFi版本

小米只提供一种配置的Pad 5:配备6GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 3.1存储空间,遗憾的是,由于缺乏microSD插槽,它无法扩展。因为Pad 5,与 Pad 5 Pro相比,Pad 5只有Wi-Fi版本,它也缺乏GPS模块。

Pad 5的USB-C端口以USB 2.0速度运行,支持通过USB OTG连接键盘或鼠标等外围设备。由于缺乏3.5毫米插孔,USB-C端口也取代了音频插孔,但小米在其平板电脑中没有包括相应的适配器。这款平板电脑支持DRM Widevine L1,因此可以播放高清质量的流媒体。

Pad 5是结构相同的Pad 5 Pro的小兄弟。专业版机型有高达8GB的内存和256GB的存储空间,提供可选的5G手机,并使用 骁龙870一个更快的SoC。还有8个扬声器而不是4个,一个指纹传感器和67瓦的充电。Pad 5被限制在33瓦特。

左边:电源按钮,扬声器
左边:电源按钮,扬声器
右边。扬声器,USB-C 2.0
右边。扬声器,USB-C 2.0
顶部:音量摇杆
顶部:音量摇杆
底部。可选键盘盖的磁性底座
底部。可选键盘盖的磁性底座

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12.5用于Pad 5

Pad 5运行Android 11,小米将其内部用户界面MIUI 12.5重叠在一起。在测试时(12月中旬),Android 安全更新是从10月1日开始的,因此仍然相当及时。

128GB的存储空间中,约有106GB是在工厂新鲜或重置状态下免费的。小米几乎完全省略了其平板电脑中的第三方工具。只有Netflix和WPS Office被安装,但它们可以很容易地被卸载。

通信和GNSS - WiFi 5和蓝牙5.0,但没有GPS

小米Pad 5的通信模块很快就被列出,因为它们仅限于蓝牙5.0和WiFi 5又称WLAN 802.11ac。该平板电脑不支持NFC。蜂窝和GPS模块也不在其曲目范围内。

Pad 5在WLAN中提供了良好的传输速率,但在接收方向上有时会出现明显的波动。当连接到我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12时,它可以以微弱优势击败 Apple iPad 2021在传输和接收性能方面,它可以勉强击败iPad 2021,但在比较设备中,它不能超过中档位置。的 小米Pad 5 Pro的速度明显更快。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
902 (886min - 925max) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (829min - 888max) MBit/s ∼96% +36%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
635 (320min - 652max) MBit/s ∼70%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
231 (114min - 380max) MBit/s ∼26% -64%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140 (55min - 209max) MBit/s ∼16% -78%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
827 (708min - 899max) MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (635min - 867max) MBit/s ∼94% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
613 (300min - 633max) MBit/s ∼74% +14%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
538 (317min - 618max) MBit/s ∼65%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s ∼59% -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
141 (83min - 201max) MBit/s ∼17% -74%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø538 (317-618)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø624 (320-652)

摄像机 - 适合视频聊天

用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

相机在平板电脑中通常扮演着从属的角色,因为它们很少用于拍照,这与智能手机不同。小米Pad 5的相机模块很快就被涵盖在技术规格中。1300万像素的主摄像头以30帧/秒的速度录制高达4K的视频,自拍摄像头的分辨率为800万像素,以30帧/秒的速度录制最高1080p的视频,没有更多信息。同样的相机设置也可以在 小米Pad 5 Pro.

Pad 5的相机模块做得比稀少的技术规格让我们相信或担心的要好。然而,相机设置只提供最低限度的选项。只有几个图片模式,而且还缺少一个用于手动调整图片参数的专业模式。相机软件提供了HDR、闪光灯、定时器功能等标准,以及用于自动图像优化的AI模式。

自拍相机实现了稳定的图片质量,在视频聊天中也有不错的表现。想用主摄像头拍照的用户也不会对Pad 5感到失望,只要他们不期望有更多好的快照。这款平板电脑在白天通过其1300万像素的传感器拍摄出相当详细和生动的照片,但它们在色调方面有时有点偏离轨道,通常有点过于鲜艳。只要你不把照片放大太多,变焦拍摄是可以的。在低光照条件下,该相机明显耗尽了能量,因为此时被摄对象只会显得模糊不清。

用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用自拍相机拍摄
用自拍相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄
用主相机拍摄

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 25x ZoomLow light

我们再仔细看看主摄像头在受控照明条件下的表现。在理想的照明条件下,它能相当准确地打出明亮和深灰色调,但在深绿色和蓝色调方面缺乏精确度。在低光照条件下(1勒克斯下的低色图),显示的颜色与原图没有任何共同之处,除了深灰色调,你无法看到测试图的任何东西。

ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 5: 10.16 ∆E min: 4.04 - max: 20.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
38 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
94.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 5: 47.84 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.85 ∆E

配件和保修 - 只包括一个22.5瓦的电源

包括22.5瓦的电源装置
包括22.5瓦的电源装置

小米包括一个22.5瓦的电源,一条USB线(C型到A型),一个快速入门指南,以及一个带有保修信息的小册子,与欧盟版本的Pad一起。33瓦的电源只在全球版本中提供。

你可以选择购买手写笔小米智能笔(100欧元/~112美元)。然而,在测试时,没有看到磁力对接的键盘盒。

Pad 5有12个月的保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 由于120赫兹的屏幕,非常流畅

由于其快速的八核SoC,6GB的内存和120Hz的显示屏,小米Pad 5可以非常流畅地操作。与之不同的是 小米Pad 5 Pro,Pad 5的电源键上没有指纹传感器,只剩下面部识别作为唯一的生物识别方法。由于缺乏红外传感器,它在黑暗中无法工作,但即使在低残光和/或低显示屏照明下,它的识别率也很高。

键盘横向
键盘横向
键盘高
键盘高

显示器 - 良好的IPS面板,无PWM

子像素
子像素

Pad 5的IPS显示屏的分辨率为2560 x 1600像素,由于没有PWM闪烁,所以很适合敏感用户使用。刷新率可以设置为60或120赫兹。支持HDR10和Dolby Vision,但由于面板的亮度,它们无法显示得很吸引人。

Pad 5的平均亮度为472.7 cd/m²,最大亮度为497 cd/m²,基本符合制造商在纯白背景下500 cd/m²的规范。在APL50测量中,明亮和黑暗的图像区域均匀分布,最大亮度为470 cd/m²。在没有亮度传感器的情况下,这款平板电脑可以管理到490cd/m²。最低亮度为2.43cd/m²。

452
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 472.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.43 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 564:1 (Black: 0.87 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Pad 5
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.95
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 11.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
21%
-27%
-15%
-20%
30%
Brightness middle
491
507
3%
550
12%
380
-23%
503
2%
497
1%
Brightness
473
491
4%
515
9%
376
-21%
477
1%
475
0%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
90
-1%
89
-2%
91
0%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.87
0.5
43%
0.96
-10%
0.24
72%
0.29
67%
0.42
52%
Contrast
564
1014
80%
573
2%
1583
181%
1734
207%
1183
110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
1.7
11%
3.3
-74%
4.61
-143%
4.4
-132%
1.4
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.1
3.9
5%
7.9
-93%
8.77
-114%
10.4
-154%
3
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
2.4
20%
4.9
-63%
5.1
-70%
7.5
-150%
2.3
23%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.248 98%
2.19 100%
2.25 98%
CCT
7182 91%
6923 94%
7288 89%
7966 82%
7700 84%
6744 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20917 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在显示设置中,你可以从 "鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "标准 "三种颜色方案中进行选择。颜色也可以根据环境光线进行调整("自适应颜色"),色温可以通过色轮或预设进行设置。当平板电脑被设置为 "标准 "图片模式,而其他设置被简单地忽略时,可以获得最佳的图片质量。在这种情况下,Pad 5并没有提供Delta E值最高为3、色温为7182 K、伽玛为2.2的杰作,但它实现了相当中性的显示效果。

色彩精度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩精度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
色彩空间(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)。
灰度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩方案标准,目标色彩空间sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

只要避免阳光直射,该平板电脑在户外表现良好。在可视角度的稳定性方面完全没有限制。内容保持完全可见,即使从非常平坦的侧面看,也不会改变其颜色。

阴天时户外使用(最大亮度)
阴天时户外使用(最大亮度)
在阴天条件下的户外使用(自动亮度)。
在阴天条件下的户外使用(自动亮度)。
观点
视角稳定

性能 - 日常使用时有足够的动力

八核SoC 骁龙860与其集成的图形芯片 阿德雷诺640加上6GB LPDDR4X内存和128GB UFS 3.1存储,小米Pad 5的系统性能很容易满足日常任务的需要。

正如预期的那样,小米平板电脑在基准测试中无法与它的姐妹机型 Pad 5 Pro竞争,后者配备了更快的SoC。从Android 阵营来看,它的表现要优于 华为MatePad 11 2021,在性能方面最接近。该 Apple iPad 2021有时与Pad 5非常接近,甚至可以在GFXBench中击败它。尽管如此,Apple 的对手几乎总是领先一些,在浏览器基准测试中不给任何Android 平板电脑机会。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points ∼65% +69%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1019 Points ∼50% +30%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
905 Points ∼44% +15%
Xiaomi Pad 5
784 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (728 - 784, n=2)
756 Points ∼37% -4%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1716, n=43, last 2 years)
616 Points ∼30% -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
483 Points ∼24% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
345 Points ∼17% -56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
3317 Points ∼12% +20%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3288 Points ∼11% +19%
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points ∼11% +17%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2768 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (2657 - 2768, n=2)
2713 Points ∼9% -2%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=43, last 2 years)
2165 Points ∼8% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1593 Points ∼6% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1207 Points ∼4% -56%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (735 - 5353, n=3, last 2 years)
2522 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1477 Points ∼1%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=3, last 2 years)
2119 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1081 Points ∼1%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
11694 Points ∼67% +3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11610 Points ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Pad 5
11318 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (11153 - 11318, n=2)
11236 Points ∼64% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
8435 Points ∼48% -25%
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 11694, n=16, last 2 years)
8147 Points ∼46% -28%
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (10095 - 11699, n=3)
11164 Points ∼73% +11%
Xiaomi Pad 5
10095 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10060 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Tablet (4454 - 12603, n=24, last 2 years)
6681 Points ∼44% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5518 Points ∼36% -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10486 Points ∼62% +21%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9901 Points ∼59% +14%
Xiaomi Pad 5
8661 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7752 - 8661, n=2)
8207 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Tablet (527 - 13682, n=36, last 2 years)
3872 Points ∼23% -55%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3122 Points ∼19% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2074 Points ∼12% -76%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
14054 Points ∼33% +17%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
13005 Points ∼30% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (12007 - 12070, n=2)
12039 Points ∼28% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5
12007 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (475 - 42751, n=36, last 2 years)
6452 Points ∼15% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3055 Points ∼7% -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2021 Points ∼5% -83%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
5552 Points ∼81% +27%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5394 Points ∼78% +23%
Xiaomi Pad 5
4385 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (3442 - 4385, n=2)
3914 Points ∼57% -11%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3346 Points ∼49% -24%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=36, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼40% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2283 Points ∼33% -48%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8844 Points ∼82% +27%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
8089 Points ∼75% +16%
Xiaomi Pad 5
6981 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (6871 - 6981, n=2)
6926 Points ∼65% -1%
Apple iPad 2021
5362 Points ∼50% -23%
Average of class Tablet (305 - 9630, n=38, last 2 years)
3098 Points ∼29% -56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2609 Points ∼24% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1649 Points ∼15% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10563 Points ∼41% +29%
Apple iPad 2021
9773 Points ∼38% +19%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9428 Points ∼37% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (8202 - 8218, n=2)
8210 Points ∼32% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5
8202 Points ∼32%
Average of class Tablet (258 - 25707, n=38, last 2 years)
4190 Points ∼16% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2476 Points ∼10% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1528 Points ∼6% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
5634 Points ∼71% +23%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5403 Points ∼68% +18%
Xiaomi Pad 5
4590 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (4367 - 4590, n=2)
4479 Points ∼56% -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3492 Points ∼44% -24%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=38, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼35% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2280 Points ∼29% -50%
Apple iPad 2021
2078 Points ∼26% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (5000 - 5406, n=2)
5203 Points ∼38% +4%
Xiaomi Pad 5
5000 Points ∼37%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2681 Points ∼20% -46%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=29, last 2 years)
2004 Points ∼15% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1543 Points ∼11% -69%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (6876 - 6987, n=2)
6932 Points ∼26% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
6876 Points ∼26%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=29, last 2 years)
2804 Points ∼11% -59%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2537 Points ∼10% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1437 Points ∼5% -79%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (2558 - 3017, n=2)
2788 Points ∼53% +9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2738 Points ∼52% +7%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2558 Points ∼49%
Average of class Tablet (533 - 3285, n=29, last 2 years)
2294 Points ∼44% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2076 Points ∼39% -19%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021
7457 Points ∼7% +118%
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=20, last 2 years)
4524 Points ∼4% +32%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
4273 Points ∼4% +25%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3818 Points ∼3% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (3428 - 3488, n=2)
3458 Points ∼3% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
3428 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1363 Points ∼1% -60%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021
7858 Points ∼7% +129%
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=18, last 2 years)
5180 Points ∼5% +51%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
4290 Points ∼4% +25%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
3823 Points ∼3% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (3436 - 3455, n=2)
3446 Points ∼3% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5
3436 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1371 Points ∼1% -60%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021
1992 Points ∼8% +102%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=16, last 2 years)
1581 Points ∼6% +61%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1228 Points ∼5% +25%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1116 Points ∼4% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (985 - 987, n=2)
986 Points ∼4% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5
985 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
372 Points ∼1% -62%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021
1872 Points ∼7% +93%
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=16, last 2 years)
1559 Points ∼6% +61%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1235 Points ∼5% +27%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1103 Points ∼4% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (970 - 974, n=2)
972 Points ∼4% 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5
970 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
376 Points ∼1% -61%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
119 fps ∼4% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (112 - 119, n=2)
116 fps ∼3% +4%
Xiaomi Pad 5
112 fps ∼3%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
60 fps ∼2% -46%
Apple iPad 2021
60 fps ∼2% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
58 fps ∼2% -48%
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=36, last 2 years)
56.2 fps ∼2% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
44 fps ∼1% -61%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
307 fps ∼2% +67%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
229 fps ∼2% +24%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
206 fps ∼2% +12%
Xiaomi Pad 5
184 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (184 - 184, n=2)
184 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=36, last 2 years)
139 fps ∼1% -24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
79 fps ∼1% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
48 fps ∼0% -74%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (65 - 103, n=2)
84 fps ∼23% +29%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
81 fps ∼22% +25%
Xiaomi Pad 5
65 fps ∼18%
Apple iPad 2021
60 fps ∼16% -8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
58 fps ∼16% -11%
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=35, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼12% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
42 fps ∼12% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
24 fps ∼7% -63%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
167 fps ∼13% +53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
137 fps ∼11% +26%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
127 fps ∼10% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (109 - 110, n=2)
110 fps ∼9% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
109 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=36, last 2 years)
79.2 fps ∼6% -27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
46 fps ∼4% -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
26 fps ∼2% -76%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
57 fps ∼2% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (40 - 74, n=2)
57 fps ∼2% +43%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
50 fps ∼1% +25%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
45 fps ∼1% +13%
Xiaomi Pad 5
40 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=36, last 2 years)
30.6 fps ∼1% -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
26 fps ∼1% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
14 fps ∼0% -65%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
110 fps ∼2% +41%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
96 fps ∼2% +23%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
89 fps ∼2% +14%
Xiaomi Pad 5
78 fps ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (77 - 78, n=2)
77.5 fps ∼2% -1%
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 227, n=36, last 2 years)
53.7 fps ∼1% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
29 fps ∼1% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
16 fps ∼0% -79%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
43 fps ∼1% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (25 - 44, n=2)
34.5 fps ∼1% +38%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
31 fps ∼1% +24%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
27 fps ∼1% +8%
Xiaomi Pad 5
25 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=36, last 2 years)
20.7 fps ∼1% -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
16 fps ∼0% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.6 fps ∼0% -62%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
69 fps ∼0% +47%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
58 fps ∼0% +23%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
52 fps ∼0% +11%
Xiaomi Pad 5
47 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (46 - 47, n=2)
46.5 fps ∼0% -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.1 - 150, n=36, last 2 years)
33.6 fps ∼0% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
18 fps ∼0% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼0% -79%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
35 fps ∼22% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (17 - 29, n=2)
23 fps ∼15% +35%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
21 fps ∼13% +24%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
18 fps ∼11% +6%
Xiaomi Pad 5
17 fps ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=40, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼9% -16%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
10 fps ∼6% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
5.8 fps ∼4% -66%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
31 fps ∼10% +72%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
23 fps ∼7% +28%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
21 fps ∼7% +17%
Xiaomi Pad 5
18 fps ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (17 - 18, n=2)
17.5 fps ∼6% -3%
Average of class Tablet (0.87 - 70, n=40, last 2 years)
12.8 fps ∼4% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
6.5 fps ∼2% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
3.6 fps ∼1% -80%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
50 fps ∼24% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (26 - 45, n=2)
35.5 fps ∼17% +37%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
33 fps ∼16% +27%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
29 fps ∼14% +12%
Xiaomi Pad 5
26 fps ∼13%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=40, last 2 years)
21.1 fps ∼10% -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
17 fps ∼8% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
9.7 fps ∼5% -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
82 fps ∼11% +74%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
60 fps ∼8% +28%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
54 fps ∼7% +15%
Xiaomi Pad 5
47 fps ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (46 - 47, n=2)
46.5 fps ∼6% -1%
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 191, n=40, last 2 years)
34.9 fps ∼5% -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
19 fps ∼3% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 fps ∼1% -79%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
704209 Points ∼69% +22%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
628715 Points ∼62% +9%
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points ∼61% +8%
Xiaomi Pad 5
575553 Points ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (563850 - 575553, n=2)
569702 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 776812, n=15, last 2 years)
472872 Points ∼46% -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
323166 Points ∼32% -44%
AImark - Score v2.x
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
119152 Points ∼45% +157%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
118331 Points ∼45% +155%
Xiaomi Pad 5
46413 Points ∼18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (46152 - 46413, n=2)
46283 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=15, last 2 years)
36140 Points ∼14% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
13045 Points ∼5% -72%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
6139 Points ∼73% +19%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5276 Points ∼62% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (5154 - 5224, n=2)
5189 Points ∼61% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
5154 Points ∼61%
Average of class Tablet (637 - 6164, n=24, last 2 years)
2943 Points ∼35% -43%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2690 Points ∼32% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
637 Points ∼8% -88%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
10171 Points ∼52% +16%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
9624 Points ∼49% +9%
Xiaomi Pad 5
8805 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (8549 - 8805, n=2)
8677 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10489, n=24, last 2 years)
5511 Points ∼28% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
4657 Points ∼24% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
4193 Points ∼21% -52%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8167 Points ∼90% +41%
Xiaomi Pad 5
5788 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (5716 - 5788, n=2)
5752 Points ∼64% -1%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
5388 Points ∼60% -7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3765 Points ∼42% -35%
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=24, last 2 years)
3470 Points ∼38% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1670 Points ∼18% -71%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
12118 Points ∼42% +18%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
11366 Points ∼39% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (10293 - 10549, n=2)
10421 Points ∼36% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
10293 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (542 - 12350, n=24, last 2 years)
4508 Points ∼16% -56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3694 Points ∼13% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
2154 Points ∼7% -79%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1411 Points ∼59% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (1346 - 1445, n=2)
1396 Points ∼58% +4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1353 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5
1346 Points ∼56%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
1314 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1544, n=24, last 2 years)
1095 Points ∼46% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
10 Points ∼0% -99%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.216 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
80.006 Points ∼56% +10%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 183, n=33, last 2 years)
74.1 Points ∼52% +2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
72.984 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (62 - 73, n=2)
67.5 Points ∼47% -8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
66.572 Points ∼47% -9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
35.985 Points ∼25% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
27.459 Points ∼19% -62%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
291.11 Points ∼100% +127%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
134.71 Points ∼46% +5%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 403, n=37, last 2 years)
130 Points ∼45% +1%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
128.11 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (110 - 128, n=2)
119 Points ∼41% -7%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
112.87 Points ∼39% -12%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
69.786 Points ∼24% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
50.255 Points ∼17% -61%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points ∼100% +110%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
121 Points ∼60% +26%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
105 Points ∼52% +9%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
96 Points ∼48%
Average of class Tablet (24 - 246, n=40, last 2 years)
95.2 Points ∼47% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (90 - 96, n=2)
93 Points ∼46% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
54 Points ∼27% -44%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
53 Points ∼26% -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min ∼100% +179%
Average of class Tablet (12.2 - 228, n=31, last 2 years)
76.9 runs/min ∼45% +25%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
68.9 runs/min ∼40% +12%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
65.5 runs/min ∼38% +7%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
61.3 runs/min ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (59 - 61.3, n=2)
60.2 runs/min ∼35% -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
33.5 runs/min ∼20% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
29.2 runs/min ∼17% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
30367 Points ∼64% +7%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
28456 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (23902 - 28456, n=2)
26179 Points ∼55% -8%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
24196 Points ∼51% -15%
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 62946, n=38, last 2 years)
22808 Points ∼48% -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
15632 Points ∼33% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
9415 Points ∼20% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
4871.7 ms * ∼100% -204%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=39, last 2 years)
4244 ms * ∼87% -165%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
3782.41 ms * ∼78% -136%
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1932.6 ms * ∼40% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (1603 - 2155, n=2)
1879 ms * ∼39% -17%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1603.3 ms * ∼33%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1446.5 ms * ∼30% +10%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
544.6 ms * ∼11% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Pad 5确保了较短的加载时间和较高的连续读取率。 然而,其他速率在某种程度上低于UFS 3.1存储的平均水平。

Xiaomi Pad 5Huawei MatePad 11 2021Lenovo Yoga Tab 11Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 LiteXiaomi Pad 5 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
16%
-29%
-37%
44%
25%
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1459.39
1468.24
1%
503.37
-66%
483.72
-67%
1684.48
15%
1560 ?(1030 - 1790, n=27)
7%
581 ?(123 - 2031, n=35, last 2 years)
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB
534.19
708.37
33%
374.36
-30%
219.34
-59%
772.29
45%
733 ?(233 - 1095, n=27)
37%
305 ?(67.4 - 1559, n=35, last 2 years)
-43%
Random Read 4KB
208.7
190.66
-9%
136.84
-34%
119.84
-43%
289.31
39%
231 ?(126 - 317, n=27)
11%
108 ?(10.1 - 310, n=35, last 2 years)
-48%
Random Write 4KB
158.95
217.51
37%
182.23
15%
195.78
23%
281.45
77%
228 ?(121 - 306, n=27)
43%
93.1 ?(4.27 - 370, n=35, last 2 years)
-41%

游戏 - 即使在高细节设置下也能流畅运行

小米Pad 5拥有反应灵敏的120赫兹显示屏和4个Dolby Atmos扬声器,是游戏的最佳选择。由于采用了 阿德雷诺640图形芯片,这款平板电脑在渲染PUBG Mobile等图形要求高的游戏时也没有问题。然而,我们在测试中安装的任何游戏都无法达到每秒30帧以上,即使是理论上没有帧数限制的Armajet也不行。

我们用工具Gamebench来确定游戏帧率.

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (30-30)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.7.0: Ø30 (29-31)

排放 - 4个扬声器发出的杜比全景声

温度

在操作过程中,小米Pad 5保持凉爽,即使在永久负载下,最高温度值为33.6℃(92.48°F)。然而,正如我们用GFXBench进行的测试所显示的,内部肯定会出现节流现象。

虽然图形上比较简单的T-Rex场景连续运行30次,性能没有明显下降,但在要求更高的曼哈顿场景中,平板电脑在运行17次后就踩下了刹车。另一方面,3DMark的压力测试也相对稳定。因此,这款平板电脑在日常使用中肯定会降低其性能,但在大多数情况下你应该不会注意到。

GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿
GFXBench电池测试 曼哈顿

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.7 (22.7-22.9)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.05-8.11)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (25.4-25.6)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø6.66 (6.65-6.67)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.29-2.31)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.36 (7.35-7.37)
Max. Load
 30.5 °C29.5 °C32.1 °C 
 30.9 °C30.6 °C32.6 °C 
 30.8 °C29.8 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
28.8 °C30.3 °C32.4 °C
28.8 °C30.3 °C33.6 °C
28.1 °C30.9 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 33.6 °C
Average: 30.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.

演讲者

小米Pad 5有4个支持Dolby Atmos的扬声器,成对分布在平板电脑的两个短边。在声音设置中可以选择四个Atmos预置。"动态"、"视频"、"音乐 "和 "语音"。然而,在测试中,Atmos四重奏只有部分具有说服力。

与智能手机相比,Pad 5产生的声音更加丰满,特别是在中音和高音部分非常平衡。然而,无论我们选择哪种预设,低音在声音组合中的代表性不足,这就是为什么Atmos声音听起来总体上有点薄。与iPad 2021的声音对比 Apple iPad 2021的比较以平局告终。Apple 平板电脑只有2个扬声器,但它在中频和高频段的表现更好一些。作为回报,它在低音范围内比Pad 5要弱。

耳机和外部扬声器可以通过USB-C适配器与Pad 5连接,该适配器不包括在平板电脑中。无线连接可以通过蓝牙5.0实现。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.837.6252422.83116.123.74027.625.25032.337.66323.430.2802236.61002239.51252146.316017.954.820013.355.925015.259.831513.260.940011.563.250012.269.963012.372.180013.372.1100014.571.2125012.274.7160011.272200011.770.2250012.168.5315012.767.2400013.672.3500013.176630013.677.3800013.170.71000013.661.21250013.655.11600013.560.7SPL2584.4N0.663.1median 13.3median 68.5Delta1.273734.425.637.429.137.223.440.336.843.228.441.324.841.722.444.319.246.716.95815.655.813.857.613.46213.361.913.865.81268.112.769.812.275.91373.813.777.913.276.813.478.81380.213.381.613.682.513.385.213.883.613.778.41473.813.571.225.591.90.789.5median 13.5median 73.80.78.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 5Apple iPad 2021
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电源管理 - 刹车充电电源

能量吸收

Pad 5在运行中消耗的电量与 小米Pad 5 Pro而且在耗电方面表现得相当经济。然而,联想 联想Yoga Tab 11需要的能量要少得多。

尽管Pad 5的充电功率可达33瓦,但小米只在欧盟版平板电脑上配备了一个22.5瓦的电源适配器。33瓦的电源只适用于中国版本。尽管充电功率低了1/3,但小米Pad 5的充电速度相当快。在测试中,大约需要2个小时,直到空电池再次完全充满。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 4.2 / 4.22 Watt
Load midlight 7.88 / 10.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Power Consumption
-44%
-14%
31%
0%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
1.3
-31%
1.33
-34%
1.2
-21%
1.21
-22%
1.14
-15%
Idle Average *
4.2
7.5
-79%
5.37
-28%
1.5
64%
4.24
-1%
4.3
-2%
Idle Maximum *
4.22
7.58
-80%
5.41
-28%
1.9
55%
4.34
-3%
4.31
-2%
Load Average *
7.88
10.03
-27%
6.87
13%
4.9
38%
6.99
11%
8.09
-3%
Load Maximum *
10.63
10.91
-3%
10.08
5%
8.8
17%
8.79
17%
10.32
3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860: Ø5.81 (2.06-10.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865: Ø4.42 (2.21-8.49)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.83 (4-8.78)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.24 (3.01-8.63)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860; Idle 1min: Ø1.88 (1.838-2.2)
Huawei MatePad 11 2021 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; Idle 1min: Ø2.34 (2.28-2.92)

电池寿命

通过12:13小时的网上冲浪和16:40小时的视频播放,Pad 5实现了稳固的电池运行时间。小米 小米Pad 5 Pro使用更节能的Wi-Fi模块,因此实现了更好的网上冲浪性能。在这些对比设备中,只有 三星Galaxy Tab S6 Lite能与这两款小米平板电脑竞争。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 17min
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Huawei MatePad 11 2021
7250 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-8%
-3%
1%
10%
Reader / Idle
2641
2292
-13%
1972
-25%
1835
-31%
2120
-20%
3013
14%
H.264
1000
898
-10%
864
-14%
1115
12%
950
-5%
1009
1%
WiFi v1.3
733
805
10%
835
14%
891
22%
792
8%
921
26%
Load
257
253
-2%
236
-8%
216
-16%
309
20%
255
-1%

Pros

+ 高质量的工艺
+ 快速的SoC
+ 120赫兹的IPS面板
+ 支持笔
+ HDR10、Dolby Vision、Dolby Atmos
+ 良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 没有IP认证
- 没有音频插孔
- 没有microSD插槽
- 只提供WiFi版本
- 只包括一个22.5瓦的电源

关于小米Pad 5的结论

在审查中。小米Pad 5。测试设备由以下单位提供
在审查中。小米Pad 5。测试设备由以下单位提供

小米Pad 5是一款快速的平板电脑,价格非常有吸引力。由于采用了 骁龙 860它为日常任务提供了足够的性能,再加上 阿德雷诺640GPU,即使在高细节设置下,它也能流畅地运行当前的游戏。有了6GB的内存,在多任务处理时应该不会有任何瓶颈。只是这款平板电脑的128GB存储空间可能过于紧张,这取决于使用情况,还因为没有通过microSD卡扩展存储的选项。

价格便宜,功能可靠,设计现代。在中档价格范围内寻找一款好的平板电脑的用户会发现小米Pad 5是一个有趣的购买对象。

小米Pad 5的IPS屏幕在120赫兹下工作,具有稳定的亮度,并且没有PWM闪烁,这让它获得了进一步的加分。4个带Dolby Atmos的扬声器听起来有点低音不足,但仍然比绝大多数智能手机的扬声器产生更好的声音。相机模块的性能一般,但对于偶尔的快照和视频聊天来说,效果不错。只是遗憾的是,小米只为欧盟版的Pad 5提供了22.5瓦的电源,尽管它可以用高达33瓦的电源充电。2小时的充电时间还是可以的,就像电池的运行时间一样。

例如,Pad 5的一个替代品是 华为MatePad 11,它的价格类似,也有一个120赫兹的屏幕。在Apple , iPad 2021将是一个选择,这也是因为这里的应用程序通常比Android ,对平板电脑的优化更好。小米也在与自己竞争,因为 Pad 5 Pro是Pad 5的姐妹机型,配置甚至更好。它是基于 骁龙870它有8个扬声器,一个指纹传感器,可选择5G,并能以高达67瓦的功率充电。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米Pad 5在小米网店的价格是400欧元(约450美元)。在测试时,它在其他在线零售商处的价格也不低,例如我们的贷款人Notebooksbilliger.

Xiaomi Pad 5 - 12/13/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
41 / 70 → 58%
Weight