Huawei P10 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 62 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P10 Lite
明智选择。 华为P10 Lite中端智能手机售价只有搭配徕卡镜头的华为P10的一半,不过除此之外可以提供接近高端的硬件配置。我们的测试将会分析它和P10机型的区别,以及如何在两台设备之间作出选择。
Source: Laptop Media
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHuawei’s P lineup has a yet another mid-range representative in the face of P10 Lite. This time, however, in addition to the capabilities, the company has paid attention to the elegant appearance achieved with the help of the glass back and pleasantly curved edges. This, of course, hasn’t prevented the fingerprint sensor from being available again. The display is 5.2″ with Full HD resolution, which is not a change compared to P9 Lite, but in the menu we find a special Eye comfort mode limiting blue light. Additionally, the battery offers reasonable durability, although in some of our tests the results were lower than those of P9 Lite. On the other hand, its charging is fast and for 10 minutes in the plug, you can get around 2 hours of video playback.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Stuff TV
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNeither of those changes make it a bad phone. If you’re after something with style, that comes in at half the price of a flagship phone, it’s still a great choice - just be aware that a little extra cash buys you a lot more phone, and the cheaper competition is basically on par when it comes to screen and CPU.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P10 Lite handset is powered by a non-removable Li-Polymer battery. This has a capacity of 3000 mAh. Running my usual continuous movie playing test, I was able to get 7 hours 5 minutes of viewing time before the handset closed itself down. I was rather disappointed with the battery performance especially when compared with the handset’s other facilities.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Nave
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, I think the P10 lite is another great smartphone for phoneography, especially with the given Portrait and Selfie Superstar mode. With the Sapphire Blue design, the demographic for this device is probably for the young and trendy millennials who really likes taking photos, especially Huawei's blurred background portrait selfie shots.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P10 Lite may be quite a few features short of the flagship P10, but that's actually fine. We expected lower specs and we got them but the internals are not bottom-of-the-barrel either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFuture talk aside, let's get back to the real question – Should you buy the P10 Lite? If you like and can handle EMUI and you do prefer Huawei's design over its rivals, by all means yes. This is one complete phone that offers great value for your money, so we can't help but give it the thumbs up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone World
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHuawei P10 lite is perfect device with light weight. It has 32GB ROM and 4GB RAM moreover it has 3000 mAh battery. All the features are excellent and it is totally providing us full entertainment in affordable price range. P10 lite can give the tough time to its competitors like Samsung, QMobile and many others. We have tested the P10 lite and it has given us best results in every field.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P10 lite certainly ticks a lot of the right boxes for a mid-range device. It’s thin, has a good sized battery, and offers reasonable performance, all on a budget. Also the ability to enable an app drawer should help EMUI find greater acceptance. The software offers some good extra features and having 4 GB of RAM is nice. While it doesn’t have a dual camera setup, the included camera is certainly usable especially in good lighting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Technik Surfer
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% features: 87% display: 86% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: n-tv
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 86% mobility: 85%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: PC Guia
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 72% features: 79% display: 85% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Esperienza Mobile
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2017
Source: Antyweb
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Helpix
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 88% mobility: 62%
Source: Yamobi
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Zing
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Portal
SK→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Arena IT
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Playtech.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 658: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.