Notebookcheck

华硕 ZenFone 3 ZE552KL 智能手机简短评测

设计师的理想。 华硕在赋予5.5寸的ZenFone 3高端外观的同时保持了性能和配置。结果得到了一台优秀而且负担得起的中档智能手机,并且它在测试中几乎没有表现出任何的缺点。
Manuel Masiero, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang),
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Zenfone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506, Core: 650 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
Display
5.5 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 十指触摸屏,手套模式, IPS, 蓝光滤镜, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大2TB micro-SD储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度传感器, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘, Wi-Fi 直链, USB-OTG, DLNA, Miracast, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, ​900, ​1900, ​2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), 最大下载速率 150 MBit/s, 最大上传速率上传 50 MBit/s, 比吸收率: 0.493 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 152.6 x 77.4
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 双LED闪光灯, 自动对焦, HDR, 光学图像稳定器, 4K 录像 (3840 x 2160 Pixel)/1080p/720p @ 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 最大录像质量 1080p @ 30 fps
Additional features
Speakers: 单个, Keyboard: 虚拟, Keyboard Light: yes, USB Type-C 线缆, 模块化电源适配器, 入耳式耳机, 快速入门指南, Asus ZenUI 3.0, 24 Months Warranty, USB Type-C, fanless
Weight
155 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
359 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +924%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼95% +873%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼100% +935%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼92% +855%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼10%
Asus Zenfone 3: Total route
Asus Zenfone 3: Total route
Asus Zenfone 3: Turning point
Asus Zenfone 3: Turning point
Asus Zenfone 3: Bridge
Asus Zenfone 3: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
635
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 658 cd/m² Average: 633.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 658 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Black: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.26
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-9%
18%
-6%
-18%
Brightness middle
658
419
-36%
378
-43%
451
-31%
328
-50%
Brightness
633
431
-32%
380
-40%
443
-30%
334
-47%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
91
-2%
93
0%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.66
0.4
39%
Contrast
997
1128
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
4.1
16%
1.95
60%
5.4
-10%
4.6
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.1
12
-32%
3.09
66%
9.9
-9%
14.7
-62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
3.3
43%
1.86
68%
6.7
-16%
2.8
52%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.1 105%
2.13 103%
2.33 94%
2.29 96%
CCT
7840 83%
6550 99%
6376 102%
8262 79%
6612 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼21%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼42% +96%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼32% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼14% -33%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼48% +127%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼9% -4%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼13% +36%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼10% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼20% +56%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼27% +110%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼28% +114%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼42%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼22% -48%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼51% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼29% -30%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼35% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼6%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼37% +542%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼9% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼2% -62%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼37% +544%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼28% +220%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼13% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼4% -60%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼36% +307%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼18%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼24% +28%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼18% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼11% -41%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼25% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼4% +81%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼4% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼1% -44%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼6% +153%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼6%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼9% +67%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼8% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼3% -43%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼12% +117%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼1% +283%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼0% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼0% -39%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼1% +287%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼2% +152%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼1% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼0% -33%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼2% +186%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼6% +294%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼8% +375%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +189%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -61%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +374%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼1% +400%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼0% +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼1% +400%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼0% +162%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼0% +80%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼1% +392%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼34%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼25% -27%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼34% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼20% -41%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼36% +5%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼35%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼47% +37%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼49% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼36% +6%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼55% +58%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼16% +354%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼6% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼2% -52%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼17% +372%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼12%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼18% +43%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼30% +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼7% -47%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼24% +97%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼18%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼20% +13%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼24% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼13% -26%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼21% +21%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼14%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼26% +78%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼24% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼10% -33%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼30% +105%

Legend

 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼9%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points ∼17% +87%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points ∼7% -26%
Honor 8
10692 Points ∼20% +118%
ZTE Axon 7
8062 Points ∼15% +64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼14%
OnePlus 3
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * ∼20% -48%
Honor 8
2979 ms * ∼5% +63%
ZTE Axon 7
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +61%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼10%
OnePlus 3
122 Points ∼15% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points ∼8% -24%
Honor 8
138 Points ∼17% +64%
ZTE Axon 7
111 Points ∼14% +32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼9%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points ∼15% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points ∼6% -29%
Honor 8
64.046 Points ∼18% +106%
ZTE Axon 7
44.754 Points ∼13% +44%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
50.07 MB/s ∼57%
Honor 8
23.59 MB/s ∼27% -53%
ZTE Axon 7
51.34 MB/s ∼59% +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
79.22 MB/s ∼82%
Honor 8
53.68 MB/s ∼56% -32%
ZTE Axon 7
78.39 MB/s ∼81% -1%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼2%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s ∼6% +146%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s ∼4% +51%
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s ∼10% +326%
ZTE Axon 7
16.22 MB/s ∼5% +119%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼23%
OnePlus 3
137.62 MB/s ∼42% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s ∼7% -69%
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s ∼11% -54%
ZTE Axon 7
121.07 MB/s ∼37% +64%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼21%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s ∼17% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s ∼7% -68%
Honor 8
119.25 MB/s ∼13% -37%
ZTE Axon 7
150.92 MB/s ∼17% -20%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼16%
OnePlus 3
408.71 MB/s ∼23% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s ∼12% -26%
Honor 8
247.46 MB/s ∼14% -12%
ZTE Axon 7
406.49 MB/s ∼23% +44%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Max. Load
 37.8 °C38.2 °C38.6 °C 
 37.3 °C36.8 °C37.9 °C 
 36 °C36.3 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 37.3 °C
34.6 °C36.2 °C39.1 °C
35.1 °C35.9 °C38 °C
34.5 °C34.9 °C36 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 36 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.52525.432.93125.334.14032.932.95033.635.96331.633.68028.430.7100272612520.826.81602229.520021.336.925020.846.931521.251.840019.456.950019.561.663017.76480017.969.3100017.869.5125017.372.9160017.471.1200016.770.6250017.268.9315018.273.8400017.976500017.669.4630017.771.6800017.873.51000017.971.11250018.170.41600018.268.2SPL3083.7N1.356.5median 17.9median 69.3Delta1.310.131.636.725.432.825.32932.935.233.649.731.632.328.429.32725.720.8282239.121.346.820.855.621.259.419.463.219.569.417.772.517.973.717.875.117.375.917.476.116.777.917.277.518.277.717.976.517.673.717.768.217.861.217.953.518.156.118.2513087.11.366.1median 17.9median 68.21.311.731.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9median 61.11.310.736.634.435.736.63032.332.43031.235.627.531.230.530.927.530.537.739.235.437.733.240.129.733.228.53029.228.526.32725.326.324.42724.124.430.926.42330.939.222.923.139.247.927.618.547.955.633.520.555.655.837.918.755.862.444.618.162.469.250.618.269.271.255.719.171.272.356.31772.371.156.617.371.172.753.317.472.775.95217.575.979.155.617.379.174.452.417.274.4714817.27171.348.217.271.382.458.717.682.478.555.317.778.573.849.817.873.866.543.11866.572.248.817.972.287.76629.987.768.919.11.368.9median 71.1median 48.8median 17.9median 71.19.710.31.59.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLZTE Axon 7Honor 8Samsung Galaxy A5 2016OnePlus 3
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.11 / 2.12 Watt
Load midlight 3.41 / 5.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Power Consumption
-12%
9%
-7%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.57
31%
0.96
-16%
0.78
6%
0.64
23%
Idle Average *
2.11
1.24
41%
1.64
22%
1.89
10%
0.84
60%
Idle Maximum *
2.12
1.36
36%
1.71
19%
2.02
5%
0.87
59%
Load Average *
3.41
5.92
-74%
2.98
13%
5.28
-55%
6.02
-77%
Load Maximum *
5.46
10.53
-93%
5.08
7%
5.44
-0%
10.45
-91%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 52min
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
11%
-27%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1502
1338
-11%
2323
55%
1487
-1%
1735
16%
H.264
905
847
-6%
672
-26%
526
-42%
704
-22%
WiFi v1.3
797
840
5%
626
-21%
499
-37%
411
-48%
Load
352
268
-24%
483
37%
255
-28%
245
-30%

Pros

+ 高制造质量
+ 指纹识别器
+ 高亮度全高清屏幕
+ Android 6.0
+ USB Type-C 接口
+ LTE 和双SIM卡
+ 长续航时间
+ 出色的相机
+ Quick Charge 3.0

Cons

- 糟糕的WIFI表现
- LTE 非全速
- 过多无用应用
- 无App2SD
- 无NFC
- Android按键无背光
In review: Asus Zenfone 3. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany
In review: Asus Zenfone 3. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

华硕在入门级产品线上提供了一台非常时尚的5.5寸手机,而且它的内在也是令人满意的。凭借着高通骁龙625八核处理器以及4GB运行内存,它拥有充足的性能来运行最新的应用和游戏。而且,它的全高清屏有着高亮度和广视角的特性,1600W像素的相机能够拍出令人满意的相片。它优秀的配置同样也包括了LTE,双SIM卡槽,带有QC技术的Type-C可反插USB接口,指纹识别。最新的安卓6.0.1 Marshmallow 操作系统,带有华硕新版ZenUI界面,使得这台成功的设备更加完美。不能不提的是它很好的电池续航能力以及较低的日常使用升温。

华硕的ZenFone 3是设计师的理想,这台中端手机看上去远远要比它的实际售价贵。

对于这台手机我们没有很多好去批评的。在屏幕的下方按键没有背光,Wi-Fi的速度偏慢。华硕对于软件的配置有些过多了,在手机中预装了很多没有必要的应用。在我们的测试中,我们无法将应用移动到micro-SD 卡中因为它们没法被格式化为内置存储。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL - 10/21/2016 v5.1(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
72 / 75 → 96%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
46 / 60 → 76%
Weight
92%
Battery
96%
Display
85%
Games Performance
32 / 63 → 51%
Application Performance
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
72%
Average
76%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ZenFone 3 ZE552KL 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2016-11-15 (Update: 2016-11-15)