华硕 ZenFone 3 ZE552KL 智能手机简短评测

Name: Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Brand: Asus

设计师的理想。 华硕在赋予5.5寸的ZenFone 3高端外观的同时保持了性能和配置。结果得到了一台优秀而且负担得起的中档智能手机，并且它在测试中几乎没有表现出任何的缺点。

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 11/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Zenfone Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 506, Core: 650 MHz

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR3

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 十指触摸屏，手套模式, IPS, 蓝光滤镜, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大2TB micro-SD储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度传感器, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘, Wi-Fi 直链, USB-OTG, DLNA, Miracast, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), 最大下载速率 150 MBit/s, 最大上传速率上传 50 MBit/s, 比吸收率: 0.493 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 152.6 x 77.4

Battery

3000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 双LED闪光灯, 自动对焦, HDR, 光学图像稳定器, 4K 录像 (3840 x 2160 Pixel)/1080p/720p @ 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 最大录像质量 1080p @ 30 fps

Additional features

Speakers: 单个, Keyboard: 虚拟, Keyboard Light: yes, USB Type-C 线缆, 模块化电源适配器, 入耳式耳机, 快速入门指南, Asus ZenUI 3.0, 24 Months Warranty, USB Type-C, fanless

Weight

155 g, Power Supply: 35 g

Price

359 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s +935%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +855%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +924%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s +873%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


635 cd/m²	634 cd/m²	651 cd/m²
630 cd/m²	658 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
625 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	620 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 658 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 633.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 658 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Black: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Screen		-9%	18%	-6%	-18%
Brightness middle	658	419 -36%	378 -43%	451 -31%	328 -50%
Brightness	633	431 -32%	380 -40%	443 -30%	334 -47%
Brightness Distribution	93	84 -10%	91 -2%	93 0%	88 -5%
Black Level *	0.66			0.4 39%
Contrast	997			1128 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.9	4.1 16%	1.95 60%	5.4 -10%	4.6 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.1	12 -32%	3.09 66%	9.9 -9%	14.7 -62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	3.3 43%	1.86 68%	6.7 -16%	2.8 52%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.1 ^105%	2.13 ^103%	2.33 ^94%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	7840 ^83%	6550 ^99%	6376 ^102%	8262 ^79%	6612 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points +96%
Honor 8	94671 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points -33%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +127%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points -4%
Honor 8	5481 Points +36%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points +56%
Honor 8	1726 Points +110%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points +114%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points +67%
Honor 8	20235 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points -43%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +117%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points +81%
Honor 8	22157 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points -44%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +153%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points +28%
Honor 8	15531 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points -41%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points +220%
Honor 8	1273 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points -60%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +307%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points +542%
Honor 8	1112 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points -62%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points +544%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points -48%
Honor 8	2587 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points -30%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps +152%
Honor 8	43 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -33%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +186%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps +283%
Honor 8	41 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -39%
OnePlus 3	89 fps +287%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps +189%
Honor 8	19 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -61%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +374%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps +294%
Honor 8	19 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -62%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +375%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.1 fps
ZTE Axon 7	16 fps +162%
Honor 8	11 fps +80%
OnePlus 3	30 fps +392%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	31 fps +400%
Honor 8	10 fps +61%
OnePlus 3	31 fps +400%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points -27%
Honor 8	6735 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points -41%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points +78%
Honor 8	2034 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points -33%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +105%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points +13%
Honor 8	3952 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points -26%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +21%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points +43%
Honor 8	2556 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points -47%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +97%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points +354%
Honor 8	1703 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points -52%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +372%
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points +37%
Honor 8	994 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points +6%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +58%

Legend

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3611 Points -26%
Honor 8	10692 Points +118%
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points +64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms *
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * +64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11887 ms * -48%
Honor 8	2979 ms * +63%
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms * +61%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	84 Points
OnePlus 3	122 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	64 Points -24%
Honor 8	138 Points +64%
ZTE Axon 7	111 Points +32%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22 Points -29%
Honor 8	64 Points +106%
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points +44%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s
OnePlus 3	408.7 MB/s +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	209.4 MB/s -26%
Honor 8	247.5 MB/s -12%
ZTE Axon 7	406.5 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	60.4 MB/s -68%
Honor 8	119.3 MB/s -37%
ZTE Axon 7	150.9 MB/s -20%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s
OnePlus 3	137.6 MB/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22.9 MB/s -69%
Honor 8	34.16 MB/s -54%
ZTE Axon 7	121.1 MB/s +64%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s +146%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11.2 MB/s +51%
Honor 8	31.5 MB/s +326%
ZTE Axon 7	16.22 MB/s +119%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s
Honor 8	53.7 MB/s -32%
ZTE Axon 7	78.4 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s
Honor 8	23.59 MB/s -53%
ZTE Axon 7	51.3 MB/s +2%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

Max. Load

Idle


37.8 °C	38.2 °C	38.6 °C
37.3 °C	36.8 °C	37.9 °C
36 °C	36.3 °C	36.4 °C

Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 37.3 °C


34.6 °C	36.2 °C	39.1 °C
35.1 °C	35.9 °C	38 °C
34.5 °C	34.9 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.24 Watt
Idle	0.83 / 2.11 / 2.12 Watt
Load	3.41 / 5.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh
Power Consumption		-12%	9%	-7%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	0.83	0.57 31%	0.96 -16%	0.78 6%	0.64 23%
Idle Average *	2.11	1.24 41%	1.64 22%	1.89 10%	0.84 60%
Idle Maximum *	2.12	1.36 36%	1.71 19%	2.02 5%	0.87 59%
Load Average *	3.41	5.92 -74%	2.98 13%	5.28 -55%	6.02 -77%
Load Maximum *	5.46	10.53 -93%	5.08 7%	5.44 -0%	10.45 -91%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		25h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 52min

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh
Battery Runtime		-9%	11%	-27%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1502	1338 -11%	2323 55%	1487 -1%	1735 16%
H.264	905	847 -6%	672 -26%	526 -42%	704 -22%
WiFi v1.3	797	840 5%	626 -21%	499 -37%	411 -48%
Load	352	268 -24%	483 37%	255 -28%	245 -30%

Pros

+ 高制造质量

+ 指纹识别器

+ 高亮度全高清屏幕

+ Android 6.0

+ USB Type-C 接口

+ LTE 和双SIM卡

+ 长续航时间

+ 出色的相机

+ Quick Charge 3.0

Cons

- 糟糕的WIFI表现

- LTE 非全速

- 过多无用应用

- 无App2SD

- 无NFC

- Android按键无背光

In review: Asus Zenfone 3. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

华硕在入门级产品线上提供了一台非常时尚的5.5寸手机，而且它的内在也是令人满意的。凭借着高通骁龙625八核处理器以及4GB运行内存，它拥有充足的性能来运行最新的应用和游戏。而且，它的全高清屏有着高亮度和广视角的特性，1600W像素的相机能够拍出令人满意的相片。它优秀的配置同样也包括了LTE，双SIM卡槽，带有QC技术的Type-C可反插USB接口，指纹识别。最新的安卓6.0.1 Marshmallow 操作系统，带有华硕新版ZenUI界面，使得这台成功的设备更加完美。不能不提的是它很好的电池续航能力以及较低的日常使用升温。

华硕的ZenFone 3是设计师的理想，这台中端手机看上去远远要比它的实际售价贵。

对于这台手机我们没有很多好去批评的。在屏幕的下方按键没有背光，Wi-Fi的速度偏慢。华硕对于软件的配置有些过多了，在手机中预装了很多没有必要的应用。在我们的测试中，我们无法将应用移动到micro-SD 卡中因为它们没法被格式化为内置存储。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL - 2016-10-21 10/21/2016 v5.1^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

72 / 75 → 96%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

46 / 60 → 76%

Weight

92%

Battery

96%

Display

85%

Games Performance

32 / 63 → 51%

Application Performance

52 / 70 → 74%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 91 → 80%

Camera

72%

Average

76%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 ZenFone 3 ZE552KL 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero, 2016-11-15 (Update: 2016-11-15)