英特尔 NUC X15 LAPAC71H 评测:配备英特尔 Arc A730M 的多媒体笔记本电脑,售价 1,050 美元起
英特尔 NUC X15 是一款面向游戏玩家和创作者的笔记本电脑,在宣布于 2022 年秋季上市后,一年后终于迎来了曙光。这应该主要是一个处理货物的案例:X15 以及整个 NUC 系列已经被英特尔停产。申克分销的笔记本电脑的酷睿 i7-12700H, Arc A730M和 FHD 面板已设定,内存和固态硬盘也可选择。
竞争对手包括Asus TUF A15 FA507,Gigabyte G5 KE,MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF,Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 和Asus VivoBook Pro 16 等设备。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.4 % | 10/2023 | Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H i7-12700H, A730M | 2.2 kg | 26.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | 06/2023 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.8 % | 04/2023 | Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.1 % | 08/2023 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.3 % | 05/2023 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.4 % | 04/2023 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接性 - Intel NUC 配备 Thunderbolt 4
盖子的背面和黑色磨砂外壳的顶部由铝制成,显示屏边框的底部由塑料制成。我们没有注意到任何制造问题。英特尔依靠光滑、简洁的外壳,在专业环境中应该不会引起太多注意。拆开机箱底部后,你可以看到电池(用螺丝固定,不是粘上去的)以及笔记本电脑的其他内部结构。
LAPAC71H 配备了三个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 1)和一个 USB-C 端口(Thunderbolt 4/USB 4)。后者不支持 Power Delivery,但可以输出 DisplayPort 信号。这款笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出端口(1x HDMI、1x DP)。英特尔没有为该设备配备 SD 卡读卡器。它的网络摄像头(0.9MP,最大 1,280 x 720 像素,无遮挡)提供了相当标准的效果。
在最佳条件下(附近没有 WiFi 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离较短),它可以实现出色的 WiFi 数据传输速率。笔记本电脑使用的是 WiFi 6E 芯片(英特尔 AX201)。有线连接也由英特尔控制器(I225-V;2.5 GBit/s)负责。
输入设备 - 带有 RGB 灯光的键盘
笔记本电脑的 Chiclet 键盘(RGB 照明)没有数字键盘,尽管有足够的空间放置数字键盘。键盘均匀、平滑,键程适中,按压点清晰。按键阻力可能会更小一些。在键盘上打字时,键盘不会变形。总的来说,英特尔提供了一款适合日常使用的键盘。安装了一块点击板(约 13.3 x 8.3 厘米)作为鼠标的替代品,它的特点是键程较短,按压点清晰。
显示屏 - LAPAC71H 采用高对比度 FHD 面板
宽高比为 16:9 的 144 Hz 快速反应面板在任何亮度水平下都不会出现 PWM 闪烁。15.6 英寸显示屏(1,920 x 1,080 像素)的亮度和对比度均达到目标(大于 300 cd/m² 和 1.000:1)。其相对较高的对比度值值得一提。没有其他显示屏可供选择。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 366 cd/m²
Contrast: 2147:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.83 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 LG Philips 160WQ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -36% | 8% | 30% | -34% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.9 | 64.9 0% | 40.7 -37% | 70.1 8% | 98.5 52% | 42.3 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 96.5 4% | 61 -34% | 99.6 8% | 99.9 8% | 62.6 -32% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 66.6 0% | 42.1 -37% | 72.3 9% | 86.1 30% | 43.7 -34% |
Response Times | -238% | -199% | -291% | 32% | -137% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.8 ? | 30.4 ? -290% | 26.64 ? -242% | 35 ? -349% | 2 ? 74% | 22 ? -182% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.3 ? | 20.8 ? -185% | 18.65 ? -155% | 24.2 ? -232% | 8 ? -10% | 14 ? -92% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 13% | -67% | -10% | 5% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 365 | 288 -21% | 269 -26% | 299.4 -18% | 504 38% | 247 -32% |
Brightness | 356 | 271 -24% | 248 -30% | 290 -19% | 465 31% | 234 -34% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 85 -1% | 92 7% | 87 1% | 89 3% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.17 -0% | 0.5 -194% | 0.21 -24% | 0.35 -106% | 0.25 -47% |
Contrast | 2147 | 1694 -21% | 538 -75% | 1426 -34% | 1440 -33% | 988 -54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.51 | 1.9 46% | 4.54 -29% | 4.25 -21% | 1.83 48% | 3.78 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.37 | 3.3 48% | 17.28 -171% | 6.71 -5% | 5.51 14% | 6.42 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.88 | 0.9 52% | 3.34 -78% | 0.52 72% | 1.34 29% | 3.94 -110% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.83 | 2.7 30% | 3.8 1% | 5.5 -44% | 3.02 21% | 2.16 44% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.17 101% | 2.35 94% | 2.39 92% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7362 88% | 6535 99% | 7408 88% | 6368 102% | 6688 97% | 6906 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -75% /
-25% | -101% /
-79% | -98% /
-46% | 22% /
14% | -66% /
-44% |
* ... smaller is better
Ex 工作时,显示屏显示的颜色相对较好:偏差约为 3.5,刚刚达到目标(DeltaE < 3)。对屏幕进行校准后,偏差降至 1.9,灰阶色调更加均衡。该面板几乎可以完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间,但无法覆盖 AdobeRGB 或 DCI P3。大多数竞争对手的面板都能呈现类似的效果。只有VivoBook的显示屏可以覆盖 P3 色彩空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.3 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.9 ms rise | |
↘ 3.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
视角稳定的 IPS 面板在任何角度都清晰易读。在室外,只要阳光不是太强烈,您就可以阅读显示屏上的内容。
性能 - 英特尔团队为游戏笔记本电脑提供动力
A酷睿 i7-12700H和 Arc A730M为游戏玩家和创作者设计的 Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H 提供动力。其他选项不详。这款笔记本电脑目前的售价约为 1,050 美元。目前的变体成本约为 1,280 美元。您可能需要考虑 Windows 许可证的额外费用。
测试条件
英特尔 NUC 软件工作室(控制中心)提供了三个配置文件来影响其性能和风扇控制(见表)。本测试使用了 "性能"(基准测试)和 "省电模式"(电池测试)配置文件。只有激活 "基准测试模式 "选项后,才能获得最高性能。不过,风扇也会长期全功率运行。
性能 | 平衡 | 省电模式 | 基准模式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 45 瓦 | 35 瓦 | 35 瓦 | 45 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 90 瓦 | 80 瓦 | 65 瓦 | 90 瓦 |
TGP (电弧控制) | 75 瓦 | 65 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 85 瓦 |
处理器
酷睿 i7-12700H 的 14 个 CPU 内核(6P、8E)的最大时钟频率分别为 4.7 GHz(P)和 3.5 GHz(E)。连续的多线程性能(CB15 Loop)导致涡轮时钟在第一次运行到第二次运行时下沉。之后,它保持稳定。
连接电源时,基准测试结果略高于 CPU 平均值。在电池模式下,其相关的单线程性能(213 点)下降幅度小于多线程性能(1012 点)。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
系统性能
运行流畅的系统并不缺乏计算能力。笔记本电脑在处理游戏、流媒体和渲染时没有任何问题。内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-4800 内存的正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (6830 - 6845, n=2) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (10529 - 11116, n=2) | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (7070 - 7260, n=2) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (10714 - 11691, n=2) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M () | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M () | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6845 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
标准延迟监控测试(网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)未发现任何异常。该系统似乎适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进,甚至降低性能。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
笔记本电脑可容纳两个 M.2-2280 SSD(1 个 PCIe 4.0、1 个 PCIe 3.0/SATA)。支持 RAID-0/1。我们测试设备中的三星固态硬盘(1 TB、PCIe 4、M.2-2280)具有出色的传输速率。正面:没有出现热节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
弧形Arc A730M- 英特尔第二强大的移动 DGPU - 最大 TGP 为 85 瓦,依靠超快的 GDDR6 显存(12,288 GB),最高时钟频率可达 2.05 GHz。该图形核心适用于中高设置下的全高清游戏。要求不高的游戏允许更多。
图形处理器的性能很大程度上取决于使用哪种性能模式:性能 "配置文件导致基准测试结果低于(合成基准测试)或与之前确定的 GPU 平均值相当(游戏实践)。当 "基准模式 "激活时,性能达到最高(TGP:85 瓦)。总而言之,GPU 的性能介于GeForce RTX 3050和RTX 3060之间。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 -1! | |
Average Intel Arc A730M | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 23160 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 46415 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17884 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7653 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Arc A730M (39.8 - 49.4, n=2) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Arc A730M (40.1 - 43.1, n=3) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Arc A730M (41.1 - 49.7, n=3) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Average Intel Arc A730M (116.6 - 137.7, n=3) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H | |
Average Intel Arc A730M (80.4 - 91.9, n=3) |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 177.4 | 170.6 | 94.3 | 40.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 267.3 | 190.3 | 106.9 | 39.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.2 | 101.6 | 96.8 | 91.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 98.5 | 67.9 | 41.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 70.7 | 55.8 | 47.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 377 | 167.8 | 140 | 116.6 |
Control (2019) | 145.7 | 66 | 51.1 | |
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 69.3 | 44.2 | 33.7 | 25.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 70.5 | 57.5 | 50.4 | 47 |
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 31.3 | 35.3 | 27.6 | 26.7 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 77 | 65 | 56 | 55 |
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 60.5 | 58 | 53.4 | 51.4 |
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 80.2 | 72.6 | 67.9 | 47.5 |
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 59.8 | 52.5 | 44.7 | 37.9 |
High On Life (2023) | 147.9 | 110.1 | 80.9 | 64.7 |
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 126.2 | 102.8 | 51.2 | 44.4 |
Dead Space Remake (2023) | 48.2 | 46.7 | 42.2 | 41.3 |
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 69.6 | 48.6 | 43.7 | 34.3 |
Returnal (2023) | 55 | 53 | 49 | 41 |
Atomic Heart (2023) | 100.1 | 73.3 | 51.1 | 37.5 |
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 111.3 | 90.6 | 74 | 72.8 |
Sons of the Forest (2023) | 53.1 | 35.2 | 34.9 | 34.2 |
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 86.4 | 64.9 | 60 | 41.3 |
The Last of Us (2023) | 34.3 | 32.2 | 31.3 | 28.7 |
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 44 | 39.4 | 36.7 | 34.7 |
Diablo 4 (2023) | 129.7 | 115.6 | 104.5 | 87.8 |
F1 23 (2023) | 164.9 | 150.3 | 109.6 | 33.1 |
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 55.4 | 50.7 | 42.5 | 42.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 74.6 | 63 | 55.1 | 52.8 |
Atlas Fallen (2023) | 78 | 74.1 | 70.4 | 59.2 |
Starfield (2023) | 34 | 30.1 | 24.8 | 22 |
The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 60 | 57 | 50 | 46 |
Lies of P (2023) | 97 | 85.8 | 75.1 | 67 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 71.6 | 57 | 50 | 47.7 |
EA Sports FC 24 (2023) | 121.8 | |||
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 60 | 55 | 55 | 44 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 207.4 | 121.7 | 74.9 | 60.9 |
Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 45.1 | 40.1 | 36.8 | 35.4 |
排放与功耗 - NUC X15 的运行时间很短
噪音排放
玩游戏时,笔记本电脑的噪音最高可达 51 dB(A)("性能模式")。在 "基准模式 "下,由于风扇持续全速运转,噪音会更大。在闲置模式和日常使用(办公、上网)中,NUC 的噪音要小得多。不过:两个风扇中的一个始终以低速运行。通过激活 NUC 软件工作室中的 "被动冷却模式 "设置,可以避免这种情况。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 50.61 / 50.89 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | -15% | 4% | -10% | -28% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 19.52 15% | 23.2 -1% | 25.2 -10% | 27 -17% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 31.05 -35% | 23.2 -1% | 25.2 -10% | 27 -17% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.3 3% | 31.05 -29% | 23.2 3% | 25.2 -5% | 37.5 -56% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 23.3 3% | 31.05 -29% | 23.2 3% | 25.2 -5% | 38 -58% |
Load Average * | 50.61 | 29.6 42% | 55.66 -10% | 35.1 31% | 55.1 -9% | 56.3 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.65 | 43 15% | 55.7 -10% | 52.5 -4% | ||
Load Maximum * | 50.89 | 43 16% | 55.51 -9% | 52.5 -3% | 61.5 -21% | 56.3 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
高负载(压力测试、 Witcher 3测试)会导致笔记本电脑某些区域明显发热。总之,这些数值从未达到临界水平。在日常使用中(办公、上网),机箱温度保持在绿色区域内。
压力测试(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)模拟了极端情况,以测试系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 和 GPU 的时钟频率在平均范围内波动。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | -12% | -2% | -6% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 59 | 48.9 17% | 52.6 11% | 47.8 19% | 44.2 25% | 47.5 19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 44.6 13% | 62.4 -22% | 42.2 17% | 53 -4% | 35.5 30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 27.1 3% | 33.6 -20% | 35.2 -26% | 32.1 -15% | 27.7 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 27.5 8% | 34.8 -16% | 35 -17% | 38.4 -28% | 29.5 2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效,但几乎没有低音。
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
笔记本电脑的功耗符合所安装硬件的预期水平。压力测试和 Witcher 3测试时,功耗水平(略有)波动。附带的电源(230 瓦)功率足够大。
从单位瓦数性能来看,该设备非常耗电。作为对比:微星微星 Cyborg在负载情况下仅需一半左右的功率,但游戏性能却明显更高。该显卡GeForce RTX 4060在微星笔记本电脑中的工作效率要比 Arc 730M 高得多,后者的 TGP 限制为 45 瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.01 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 11.9 / 13.9 Watt |
Load |
137 / 203 Watt |
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | -1% | -18% | 1% | 32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 8 -7% | 7.66 -2% | 15.6 -108% | 8.7 -16% | 6 20% |
Idle Average * | 11.9 | 12.1 -2% | 10.3 13% | 17.7 -49% | 13.1 -10% | 8.8 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.9 | 12.5 10% | 16.05 -15% | 20.6 -48% | 18.3 -32% | 11.9 14% |
Load Average * | 137 | 74.9 45% | 115.8 15% | 87.4 36% | 116 15% | 89 35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 166 | 136.6 18% | 168.7 -2% | 121.7 27% | 117.6 29% | 90.3 46% |
Load Maximum * | 203 | 185 9% | 234.6 -16% | 138 32% | 162 20% | 99 51% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款 15.6 英寸设备在我们的实际无线局域网测试(使用脚本调用网页时的负载映射)中的运行时间为 5:44 h,虽然还算不错,但并不出色。
Pros
Cons
结论--这里没有讨价还价的余地
英特尔的 NUC X15 面向游戏玩家和创意工作者。这意味着视频和图像编辑、流媒体、渲染和游戏都属于这款笔记本电脑的使用范围。A酷睿 i7-12700H和Arc A730M提供了必要的动力--两款芯片都能以稳定的高时钟频率运行。
英特尔 NUC X15 既没有给人留下深刻印象,也没有让人失望。不过,考虑到其 CPU 性能和高功耗,这款笔记本电脑的价格实在太高了。
与同类竞争产品相比,其低效的 Arc GPU 每瓦性能较低。与目前所有的 GPU(RX7000、RTX 4000)一样,A730M 拥有光线追踪内核和 AV1 支持(解码和编码)--这些都是创造者笔记本电脑所必需的功能。
该设备的排放量在同类产品中属于典型水平。实际运行时间接近 6 小时,可以说是相当不错。它的 USB-C 端口(Thunderbolt 4)不支持 Power Delivery,但可以输出 DisplayPort 信号。此外,这款笔记本电脑还提供扩展选项(扩展坞解决方案、外置 GPU)。总而言之,它配备的 FHD 显示屏(15.6 英寸、IPS、144 Hz)给我们留下了良好的印象。
另一个选择可能是华硕 VivoBook Pro 16:它的总体计算性能略低,但运行时间更长、Power Delivery 和 16:10 屏幕使其受益匪浅。Aorus 15 9KF-E3DE383SH 可能是一款不错的预算替代产品。由于采用了GeForce RTX 4060(TGP:140 瓦),它的游戏性能比 X15 好得多。目前,这款产品的网上售价约为 1,040 美元。我们已经测试过更强大的版本的 Aorus 15。
价格和供应情况
英特尔 NUC X15 LAPAC71H 可通过Schenker 在线商店进行单独配置和订购。.目前的测试设备售价约为 1,280 美元。基本型号(16 GB 内存、500 GB 固态硬盘)的价格约为 1,050 美元。
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H
-
10/13/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.