关于摩托罗拉 Moto G67 的结论
摩托罗拉 Moto G67 是一款纤薄的智能手机,但电池容量相对较大,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中续航时间超过 20 小时。这款手机轻巧、时尚、做工精良,目前已在德国上市,售价不到 200 欧元。
它配备了一个超广角摄像头和一个稳定的主摄像头,自拍摄像头甚至能拍出相当不错的照片。
不过,它最大的亮点是非常明亮、色彩准确的 AMOLED 显示屏,还能正常显示 HDR 内容。唯一的缺点是会出现 90 Hz 的闪烁,这可能是 PWM 的缘故。
在性能方面,摩托罗拉需要提供更多才能脱颖而出,用户偶尔不得不忍受卡顿。与其他制造商相比,四年的软件更新也让人感觉相当有限。
总的来说,Moto G67 是一款时尚的中低端智能手机,其突出之处主要在于明亮的显示屏。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在德国,Moto G67 已在网上广泛销售,售价低于 200 欧元,包括Amazon Germany 等零售商。.其他市场的供货情况和价格可能有所不同。
规格
外壳和连接:包括 eSIM 支持
与目前几乎所有的摩托罗拉智能手机一样,Moto G67 的后面板也是软塑料材质,具有类似皮革的质感。手感纤薄舒适,做工精良。相机模块通过优雅的曲线与后面板无缝集成。有浅绿色和蓝灰色两种颜色可供选择。
该手机有 128 GB 或 256 GB 两种存储容量可供选择。两款机型均配备 4GB RAM,容量相当有限。内存容量有限很可能是受当前内存价格的影响。
除了 nano-SIM 卡插槽外,该手机还支持 eSIM 卡。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G67 (Angelbird V60) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通讯和操作:适合国际使用
Wi-Fi 的速度不是特别快,但发送和接收方向的传输速率都在 300 Mbps 左右,而且连接稳定,对于大多数家庭网络来说完全足够。
Moto G67 有多种移动频率可供选择,因此在国外旅行时也可以使用它来访问移动互联网。不过,在我们的测试中,接收有时有些不稳定。
得益于高达 120 Hz 的刷新率,触摸屏反应灵敏,运行稳定。指纹传感器集成在电源按钮上,解锁速度快,识别准确率高。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G67 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
软件和可持续性:少量更新
Android 摩托罗拉预装了 16 项软件,软件更新将持续到 2030 年。这个期限并不算长,尤其是考虑到欧盟的相关规定,而摩托罗拉似乎对其几乎所有的设备都置若罔闻。
包装不含塑料,但没有关于该设备可持续性的其他信息。
相机:令人惊喜的自拍相机
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera

显示屏:几乎各方面都非常出色
亮丽的 AMOLED 显示屏无疑是 Moto G67 的亮点之一:全屏亮度超过 1,400 cd/m²,在显示 HDR 内容或较小的图像区域时,亮度会更高。色彩还原也非常准确,分辨率明显高于同类手机。
对于敏感的用户来说,唯一的烦恼就是 PWM 闪烁,我们测得的频率为 90 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1423 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.84 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.258
CCT: 6467 K
| Motorola Moto G67 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G77 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | -22% | -102% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1423 | 1558 9% | 979 -31% | 691 -51% | 1315 -8% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1380 | 1526 11% | 969 -30% | 672 -51% | 1300 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 96 3% | 95 2% | 92 -1% | 97 4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.84 | 0.79 6% | 1.3 -55% | 3.15 -275% | 1.22 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.77 | 2.97 -7% | 2.6 6% | 4.41 -59% | 2.7 3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.3 -0% | 1.6 -23% | 3.6 -177% | 2 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.258 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.041 108% | 2.258 97% |
| CCT | 6467 101% | 6489 100% | 6688 97% | 6507 100% | 6503 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G67 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Motorola Moto G67 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz Amplitude: 12 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7904 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命:请提供更多动力
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6300联发科 Dimensity 6300 并不是最快的处理器,这一点在日常使用中显而易见:偶尔的卡顿和等待时间在 Moto G67 上是正常的。例如,三星和小米的手机在价格相近的情况下速度明显更快。
UFS 2.2 存储器的速度可以接受,但其他制造商在这方面也提供了更多。
在压力测试中,这款手机的性能相当稳定,在负载情况下也不会过热。
扬声器的声音非常中重,但音量相当大。虽然没有 3.5 毫米音频插孔,但蓝牙支持包括相当广泛的无线音频传输编解码器。
电池容量略大于大多数同类设备,摩托罗拉为其配备了一块 5,200 毫安时的电池。因此,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款手机的续航时间超过了 20 小时,与同类产品相比表现非常出色。在正常使用情况下,两天不充电是现实的。充满电大约需要 1.5 小时。
| Motorola Moto G67 | Motorola Moto G77 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 5 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 45% | -46% | 57% | 5% | 170% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 543.2 | 522.1 -4% | 911.87 68% | 528.2 -3% | 1235 127% | 739 ? 36% | 2207 ? 306% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 503.1 | 494.6 -2% | 867.34 72% | 170.7 -66% | 795 58% | 539 ? 7% | 1883 ? 274% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 220.1 | 217.2 -1% | 222.77 1% | 134.7 -39% | 222 1% | 194.9 ? -11% | 302 ? 37% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 215.6 | 206.2 -4% | 302.72 40% | 56.4 -74% | 302 40% | 188 ? -13% | 354 ? 64% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| Motorola Moto G67 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G67 | |
| Motorola Moto G77 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
Motorola Moto G67 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G67 5200 mAh | Motorola Moto G77 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G 5520 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 2% | -16% | -25% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 48.3 | 50 4% | 36.6 -24% | 33.7 -30% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 20.4 | 20 -2% | 19 -7% | 13.2 -35% | 16.9 -17% |
| Load (h) | 5 | 5.2 4% | 4.2 -16% | 4.5 -10% | |
| H.264 (h) | 21.1 | 17.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Motorola Moto G67
- 04/14/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Moto G67 Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 239€ | 182 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Moto G77 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 300€ | 182 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $259.50 List Price: 300€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 5G Samsung Exynos 1330 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: List Price: 209€ | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: List Price: 349€ | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































