关于摩托罗拉 Moto G87 的结论
与摩托罗拉 Moto G87 一起度过日常生活是一件多么惬意的事情：时尚的外壳、良好的做工，包括对外界环境的保护。重量轻，运行可靠。microSD 读卡器和亮丽的屏幕使其更加完美。
唯一的问题是，与前代产品相比，Moto G87 的性能下降了很多，现在配备的 SoC 通常只适用于价格便宜一半的设备。
四年的更新时间还算可以，但考虑到竞争对手更长的承诺和当前的欧盟指令，这还远远不够。
在我们推荐摩托罗拉 Moto G87 之前，它的价格必须大幅下降。这是一个遗憾，因为这款中档手机实际上做了很多正确的事情，但由于成本削减的限制和激烈的竞争而失败了。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Moto G87 可在欧洲各地的在线零售商处购买。
。
- $269.69Motorola Moto G Power - 2026 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/128GB | 50MP Camera | Pantone Evening Blue | AI Camera System, Military Grade, Ram Boost
- $229.50Motorola Moto G86 Dual-SIM 256GB ROM + 8GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Pantone Spellbound) - International Version
- $215.00Motorola Moto G86, 8/256 GB, Golden Cypress
规格
表壳和功能 - 仿皮表背
目前，几乎所有的摩托罗拉智能手机都提供 Pantone 颜色的高品质人造皮革机背，Moto G87 也不例外：背部的 Ouverture 和 Blue Atoll 两种颜色可选，深蓝色或浅蓝色均可，边框也相应调整。
摄像头模块与材质融为一体，略带弧度，非常优雅。外壳采用了优质、坚固的表面处理，并通过了 IP68/IP69 认证，这意味着它也可以被带入浅水中。
USB 端口只能使用 USB 2.0 连接，不能输出图像信号。在内存方面，它有 256 GB 和 8 GB 内存，可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展，不过在我们的测试中，读卡器的速度并不快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Motorola Moto G87 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 适合日常使用的无线局域网
Moto G87 是一款 5G 手机，其移动频率足以满足许多国家的需求。
不过，WiFi 调制解调器仅提供 WiFi 5 作为最快标准，这意味着在我们的测试中只能达到约 250 - 360 MBit/s 的数据传输速率。这对于大多数日常活动来说应该足够了，但要求较高的用户可以从其他制造商那里获得更快的 Wi-Fi。
120 Hz 的屏幕可以快速、精确地操作。指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后面。它能快速、可靠地解锁手机，但位置太低，不符合我们的口味。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Moto G86 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续性--2030 年前的安全
Android 16 预装在设备上。摩托罗拉将自己的所有功能都外包给了一个应用程序，以便更方便地安装更新。
安全更新是从 3 月 1 日开始的，在测试时已经有些旧了。摩托罗拉每三个月发布一个新版本。
更新将持续到 2030 年，即四年，外加三个主要Android 版本。
包装是无塑料的，但除此之外没有关于该设备可持续性的信息。
相机 - 部分锐度适中
2 亿像素的主摄像头不会让你眼花缭乱：在日常使用中，它通常只能拍摄 1250 万像素的照片。
不过，这通常绰绰有余，更重要的是图像的清晰度，在我们的测试图像中，清晰度从相当好到相当差不等。黑暗环境下的亮度也很一般。
广角摄像头拍摄的快照还算合格，但放大后几乎看不出任何细节。
自拍摄像头的表现更令人信服：图像相当清晰，而且可以很好地放大。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
显示屏 - 美观明亮
AMOLED 屏幕可以变得非常明亮，并提供良好的色彩还原。在户外使用也没有任何问题。
在最低亮度下，我们测得的 PWM 闪烁频率相当高，约为 360 Hz。不过，敏感的人在购买前应先试用一下屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1850 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.21 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229
CCT: 6439 K
| Motorola Moto G87 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G86 P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Nothing Phone (4a) AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | -31% | -50% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1850 | 1456 -21% | 1536 -17% | 1155 -38% | 1754 -5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1813 | 1362 -25% | 1538 -15% | 1136 -37% | 1748 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 89 -7% | 97 1% | 97 1% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.21 | 1.08 11% | 2.6 -115% | 2.42 -100% | 1.5 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.01 | 2.21 45% | 5.7 -42% | 5.63 -40% | 3.5 13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.4 30% | 2 -0% | 3.7 -85% | 2.4 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.229 99% | 2.234 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.246 98% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6439 101% | 6405 101% | 6878 95% | 7263 89% | 6358 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 361.6 Hz Amplitude: 13 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 361.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 361.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7837 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 耗电量更少
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6400对于一款售价 450 美元左右的智能手机来说，联发科 Dimensity 6400 是一个令人吃惊的选择：它实际上被用于价格低廉得多的智能手机，但内存危机和其他成本削减的影响在这里可能显而易见。
在菜单中通常可以流畅操作，但即使是稍微复杂一点的应用程序也会明显超出处理器的负荷。
内存也可以更快，因此你不得不忍受稍长的加载时间。
至少，负载下的发热量很低，SoC 在长时间负载的情况下只会出现轻微的节流。
摩托罗拉 Moto G87 配备了立体声扬声器，不过两个扬声器中有一个是听筒。在最大音量下，高音被过分强调，听起来往往令人不悦。如果稍稍降低音量，声音会变得更加悦耳，但低频仍然听不到。
电池容量与上一代产品 Moto G86 相比没有增加，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，续航时间也非常接近：17:30 小时左右，还算不错，在不充电的情况下应该足够使用一个工作日。不过，同价位的其他手机的续航时间要长得多。
电池充电功率可达 30 瓦。我们需要大约 1:30 小时才能充满电。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (94.3 - 100.3, n=5) | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | Motorola Moto G86 | Nothing Phone (4a) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | Honor Magic8 Lite | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | 64% | 1% | 87% | -6% | 89% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 987.6 | 980.4 -1% | 2003.93 103% | 945 -4% | 1948.54 97% | 901 ? -9% | 2241 ? 127% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 701.3 | 687.1 -2% | 1596.2 128% | 837.4 19% | 1828.13 161% | 732 ? 4% | 1923 ? 174% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 224.6 | 219.3 -2% | 263.22 17% | 184 -18% | 344.19 53% | 225 ? 0% | 307 ? 37% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 302.6 | 295.2 -2% | 325.75 8% | 326.1 8% | 412.87 36% | 250 ? -17% | 360 ? 19% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Motorola Moto G86 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Moto G86 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G86 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
Motorola Moto G87 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G86 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G87 5200 mAh | Motorola Moto G86 5200 mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) 5080 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -1% | 3% | 75% | 32% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 17.4 | 17.3 -1% | 18 3% | 30.5 75% | 23 32% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 34.4 | 39.2 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 20.1 | 31.7 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.9 | 5.2 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Moto G87 可能是一款拥有明亮屏幕的出色手机，但就其价格而言，性能并不突出。
如果你喜欢它的外观，你可以花更少的钱从摩托罗拉买到非常相似的智能手机。
Motorola Moto G87
- 05/22/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 74.6%  | Motorola Moto G87 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 183 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 75.9%  | Motorola Moto G86 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: List Price: 299€ | 185 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED |
3. 78.6%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 429€ | 204.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2720x1224 440 PPI AMOLED |
4. 77.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
5. 78%  | Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
