Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

全新Galaxy A 智能手机为中端手机带来了一股清新之风：三星Galaxy A26 5G 评测

软件更新至 2031 年。

新款Galaxy A 智能手机来了，其中Galaxy A26 5G 是 2025 年最实惠的机型。与上一代产品相比，它拥有更好的处理器、防水外壳、人工智能功能，现在还能享受 6 年更新。其价格为 300 美元，有很强的下降趋势。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Galaxy A Samsung Smartphone Touchscreen

三星Galaxy A26 5G 的评价

三星Galaxy A26 5G 具有很高的性价比。它功能强大，通过了 IP67 认证，采用 Knox Vault 安全架构，更新至 2031 年，采用明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕，这些都是这款时尚、高品质中端智能手机的优势所在。其 Exynos 1380 处理器可为日常使用提供足够的动力，也适合游戏。该手机的主摄像头能拍摄出该价位手机所能拍摄的照片。

另一方面，其经济实惠的价格也意味着一些妥协。它的电池续航能力一般，但足以满足一天的高强度使用。它不支持 eSIM 或无线充电，使用过时的 WiFi 5，无线局域网速度也不是最高的。此外，与Galaxy A25 5G 相比，三星取消了手机的立体声扬声器和 3.5 毫米插孔，令人感到遗憾。

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板
+ 时尚设计
+ 丰富的功能
+ 6 年更新
+ 配备 OIS 的出色主摄像头
+ 低废热
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少
- 只有 WiFi 5
- 不支持 eSIM
- PWM 闪烁
- 不含电源
- 无无线充电
- 无 3.5 毫米耳机插孔
- 单声道扬声器

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，您可以在亚马逊上以 229.50 美元的价格购买 256GB 版本的三星Galaxy A26 5G。

三星更新了其广受欢迎的中端Galaxy A 系列。共有三款新机型：Galaxy A26 5G、 Galaxy A36 5G和Galaxy A56 5G。2025 系列中最经济实惠的入门机型是Galaxy A26 5G。

与上一代产品相比，Galaxy A26 5G 在许多方面都有所改进。这款新型中端智能手机的外壳质量更高、更耐用，采用了大猩猩玻璃Victus+和IP67防护等级，并被赋予了一些人工智能功能，三星将其概括为 "Awesome Intelligence"（超强智能）。

规格

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Galaxy A20 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 16 mio. colors, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 99.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung SmartThings, Camera2 API Limited, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 164 x 77.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, charging speed up to 25W
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF, OIS, up to 10x digital zoom) + 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2) + 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED flash, video recording up to FullHD@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: single speaker, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick Start guide, Warranty information, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.414 W/kg, Body SAR 0.962 W/kg; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC (Samsung Seamless Codec); GPS: GPS (L1), Galileo (E1), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1I, B1C), QZSS (L1), fanless, waterproof
Weight
200 g
Price
299 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 - 防水防尘Galaxy A 手机

与前代 6.5 英寸产品相比，A25 5G Galaxy A25 5GGalaxy A26 5G 的尺寸增加到了 6.7 英寸，但重量几乎没有变化。它的重量仅增加了 3 克，达到 200 克，这意味着新的Galaxy A 机型再次给人一种拿在手上很轻的感觉。同时，它比 8.3 毫米的Galaxy A25 5G 更纤薄，厚度仅为 7.7 毫米。

Galaxy A26 5G 在外壳材料方面实现了最大的飞跃。它的边框由塑料制成，但正面和背面现在都由大猩猩玻璃 Victus+ 保护。Galaxy A26 5G 还通过了 IP67 认证，具有防尘防水功能。

在欧盟，三星Galaxy A26 5G 有黑色、白色和薄荷绿三种颜色。在印度和菲律宾等国家，这款智能手机还有粉红色。

三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A26 5G（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.35 mm 201 g164 mm 77.5 mm 7.7 mm 200 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.55 mm 190 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.4 mm 185.5 g161 mm 76.5 mm 8.3 mm 197 g161 mm 73 mm 8 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 -Galaxy A26 5G，UFS 3.1 存储容量高达 256 GB

三星Galaxy A26 5G 配有 128 或 256 GB 存储空间。在本次测试所在的 DACH 地区，小容量版本配备 6 GB 内存，256 GB 版本配备 8 GB 内存。根据国家和地区的不同，该智能手机还提供其他存储配置。

  • 6/128 GB 存储空间：约 300 美元
  • 8/256 GB 存储空间：约 400 美元

Galaxy A26 5G 具有一系列可靠的连接选项，包括蓝牙 5.3、NFC、混合双卡双待和 USB-C 2.0。此外，它还支持三星的安全解决方案 Knox Vault，可以加密存储密码和其他敏感信息。

不过，前代产品的两项功能被取消了：3.5 毫米插孔没有了，立体声扬声器也没有了，只能发出单声道的声音。与前代机型的硬件接近传感器不同，Galaxy A26 5G 采用了虚拟传感器，通过陀螺仪和加速计获取数据。

Galaxy A26 5G 可通过 Miracast 将屏幕内容无线传输到外部显示器或电视。DRM 还支持 Widevine L1，可播放受拷贝保护的高清网络流。与我们的三星 980 Pro 测试固态硬盘连接后，USB 端口的数据吞吐量达到了 25.5 MB/s，这是 USB 2.0 的典型速度。

左：SIM/microSD 插槽（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
左：SIM/microSD 插槽（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
上图：麦克风（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
上图：麦克风（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

microSD 读卡器

Galaxy A26 5G 支持最大 2 TB 的 microSD 卡，可使用 exFAT 文件格式进行格式化。使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡，microSD 阅读器在我们的复制测试中实现了 54.7 MByte/s 的良好数据吞吐量。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
54.66 MB/s
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird V60)
37.9 MB/s -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
30.6 MB/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280 (Angelbird V60)
27.4 MB/s -50%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40.4 (29.2-54.9)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.7 (16.1-45.5)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (17.6-53.8)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80.2 (49.3-105.5)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (54.8-83.8)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (39.1-107.7)

软件 -Android 15，人工智能功能和更新至 2031 年

Galaxy A26 5G 运行Android 15 和三星 OneUI 7 用户界面。制造商承诺自上市起 6 年内进行软件更新，即直到 2031 年 3 月。在此期间，除季度安全更新外，还将进行多达 6 次操作系统升级。Android 安全更新。

由于硬件配置的原因，Galaxy A26 5G 不支持 OneUI 7 的大部分 AI 功能，包括锁屏界面上的每日简报小部件。不过，谷歌圈搜索和照片应用中的对象橡皮擦功能还是包含在内的。

三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G

可持续性

Galaxy A26 5G 采用无塑料包装。制造商在其网站上提供了生命周期评估，列出了每款智能手机在生产、使用和处置过程中对环境的影响。Galaxy A26 5G 的排放量为 33.6 千克 CO₂当量（生产）和 41.7 千克 CO₂当量（配送、使用和废弃）。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy A26 5G 上只有 WiFi 5

Galaxy A26 5G 具有良好的蜂窝频率支持，在欧洲应该不会出现任何接收问题。不过，在旅行时，您应该事先检查智能手机是否支持目的地国家所需的频率。

三星智能手机使用的是现已过时的 WiFi 5，但当连接到我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 时，Galaxy A26 5G 提供了稳定的传输速率。峰值约为 350 MBit/s，与大多数竞争对手不相上下，尽管大多数竞争对手已经使用 WiFi 6。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
354 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
348 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼42%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
403 (min: 383) MBit/s ∼48%
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
304 (min: 288) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
339 (min: 325) MBit/s ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼45%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
348 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø354 (332-368)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø393 (196-413)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (343-351)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø374 (361-380)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Galaxy A26 5G 使用单频卫星导航系统 GPS、Glonass、北斗、伽利略和 QZSS 确定位置。在我们的测试中，室内定位耗时较长，结果也不是特别准确。而在室外，手机的定位要准确得多。

在穿过绿地和建筑密集区的 4 公里步行路程中，Galaxy A26 5G 的定位精度几乎与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相当。因此，这款智能手机非常适合用于导航任务。即便如此，你也不得不接受它有时会与你的实际位置相差几米的事实。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：路线
GPS 测试：路线
GPS 测试：池塘
GPS 测试：池塘

电话功能和通话质量 - 混合双卡，但无 eSIM 卡

Galaxy A26 5G 在我们的测试通话中提供了良好的通话质量，即使在嘈杂的环境中也能可靠地过滤掉环境噪音。这款三星智能手机支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。其卡槽可容纳两张 SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。

摄像头 - 三摄像头设置，5000 万像素和 OIS

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

自拍摄像头的分辨率为 1300 万像素，采用固定对焦，在日光下能拍摄出曝光和清晰度均衡的优质照片。视频最高可录制 4K，每秒 30 帧。

背面的三摄像头由 5000 万像素主摄像头、800 万像素超广角摄像头和 200 万像素微距摄像头组成。三星没有提供任何关于使用哪种相机传感器的信息。

得益于 5000 万像素分辨率、f/1.8 快速光圈和光学防抖功能的组合，主摄像头能拍摄出细节丰富、清晰锐利的照片。照片对色彩的描绘比较中性，放大后会显得有些颗粒感。自动对焦并不总是完美的。但总的来说，在这个价位的手机中，它的成像质量还是相当不错的。

放大 2 倍的照片看起来还可以接受，即使在环境光线较暗的情况下，照片仍然可以使用。

手机的超广角摄像头拍摄的快照色彩均衡，但比主摄像头略暗，图像噪点较多。200 万像素的微距摄像头可以放在一边，因为主摄像头的变焦几乎总是能拍出更好的照片。

主摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的优质视频。切换到超广角摄像头时，最高只能拍摄每秒 30 帧的全高清视频。视频防抖动功能也只能在 30 帧/秒的全高清模式下工作。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylight photoUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在光线最佳的测试实验室中，主摄像头非常精确地捕捉到了 Colorchecker 色度表的参考色。在光线极弱的情况下，它的表现也很出色，因为色卡和测试色卡仍然完全可辨。

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: 4.48 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 7.91 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A26 5G: 33.88 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 49.54 ∆E

附件和保修 -Galaxy A26 5G 不带电源

Galaxy A26 5G 随附一条 USB-C 电缆和一个 SIM 卡工具。三星在其网上商店出售配套的 25 瓦电源适配器（如 EP-T2510N）以及其他可选配件。

Galaxy A26 5G 享有 12 个月的标准保修期。保修期可通过三星 Care+ 保险延长，该保险可为智能手机提供长达两年的防损坏和防盗保护。根据套餐的不同，费用在 40 美元到 110 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 - 响应式触摸屏

Galaxy A26 5G 对 120 Hz 屏幕上的输入作出了准确的响应，没有任何明显的延迟。OneUI 7 大部分时间都运行得非常流畅，但我们注意到在运行要求特别高的应用程序时会出现一些短暂的延迟。ERM 振动电机的强度可以微调。

集成在设备电源按钮上的指纹传感器在我们的测试中表现出色，识别率很高，并能快速解锁智能手机。在环境光线充足的情况下，使用自拍摄像头进行的生物特征 2D 面部识别（虽然不那么安全）也同样可靠。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 -Galaxy A26 5G 配备 Super AMOLED 屏幕

子像素
子像素

Galaxy A26 5G 的 Super AMOLED 屏幕尺寸比 A25 5G 增加了 0.2 英寸。 Galaxy A25 5G但分辨率仍为 2340 x 1080 像素。像素密度从 396 PPI 略微降低到 385 PPI，但显示效果依然清晰。其刷新率默认设置为 120 Hz，也可切换为 60 Hz。

在我们的测试中，当显示全白背景时，屏幕的平均亮度为 731 cd/m²，略低于Galaxy A25 5G。但是，当显示均匀分布的亮暗区域时（APL18 测量），亮度增加到 1112 cd/m²，与前代产品相当。在显示 HDR 内容时，亮度最高可达 1265 cd/m²。关闭光线传感器后，亮度最高可达 349 cd/m²。

Super AMOLED 屏幕不使用高频 PWM 调光，在我们测量的所有亮度水平下，闪烁频率都很低，只有 240 Hz。对于敏感的人来说，这可能会导致不适，如灼伤眼睛。

727
cd/m²		737
cd/m²		731
cd/m²
727
cd/m²		735
cd/m²		729
cd/m²
728
cd/m²		732
cd/m²		729
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 737 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 730.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.31 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.98
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7"		Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"		Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
49%
27%
40%
49%
49%
Brightness middle
735
1281
74%
1287
75%
912
24%
1156
57%
1138
55%
Brightness
731
1281
75%
1274
74%
928
27%
1150
57%
1137
56%
Brightness Distribution
99
94
-5%
97
-2%
96
-3%
98
-1%
97
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
1.47
61%
1.9
50%
1.09
71%
1.1
71%
1.1
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
3.14
46%
8.7
-50%
2.26
61%
3.1
47%
2.6
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
2.2
45%
3.4
15%
1.6
60%
1.6
60%
1.6
60%
Gamma
1.98 111%
2.062 107%
2.26 97%
2.251 98%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6628 98%
6628 98%
7072 92%
6491 100%
6304 103%
6284 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 17.81 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8445 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用照片光谱仪和 Calman 软件进行分析后发现，屏幕的色彩还原并不太精确。如果将预设色彩配置文件从 "鲜艳"切换到"自然"，显示屏的色彩表现最为准确，但仍高于色彩和灰度的 Delta-E < 3 的理想范围。虽然在日常使用中您应该不会注意到太多，但这些偏差仍然值得一提，因为它们代表着一种倒退，而 Galaxy A25 5G对色彩的还原要精确得多。

色彩准确度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩准确度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（屏幕模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.091 ms rise
↘ 0.911 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.97 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.023 ms rise
↘ 0.951 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Galaxy A26 5G 在户外表现出色。只要避免阳光直射，其视角稳定的显示屏即使在明亮的环境中也能轻松阅读。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角

性能 - 三星手机的 Exynos 1380

Galaxy A26 5G 配备了为 A35 5G 预留的中端处理器。 Galaxy A35 5GGalaxy 的中端处理器，即 Exynos 1380.

与 Galaxy A25 5GA25 5G 相比，其性能提升仍然很小，但八核 SoC 提供的动力足以轻松处理日常任务。它与 联发科 Dimensity 7300大致相当。 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion, 小米 Poco X7和 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G.

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points +53%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1052 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1008 - 1023, n=5)
1014 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1008 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
976 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points +54%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3032 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (2857 - 2906, n=5)
2877 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2857 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2152 Points -25%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +124%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points +36%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
652828 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
583142 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (434759 - 602612, n=5)
558136 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
474853 Points -19%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15563 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
13748 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13404 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (11259 - 13488, n=6)
12707 Points -5%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +53%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
708 Points +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (637 - 703, n=6)
662 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
646 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
598 Points -7%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6801 Points +41%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
5117 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4829 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4416 - 4829, n=6)
4556 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10640 Points +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (8316 - 9016, n=6)
8830 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8825 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8316 Points
Memory
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7516 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7059 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6297 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4301 - 7059, n=6)
5016 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points -33%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19418 Points +177%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8611 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (7019 - 7126, n=6)
7063 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7019 Points
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1612 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1433 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1320 - 1533, n=6)
1394 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1320 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
26724 Points +323%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +188%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points +36%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
6320 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (5835 - 6320, n=6)
6063 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4988 Points -21%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
27735 Points +4561%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (545 - 647, n=6)
603 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
595 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=42, last 2 years)
442 Points +128%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
194 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
194 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
141 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
137 Points -29%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=41, last 2 years)
998 Points +178%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
359 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
359 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
138 Points -62%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
136 Points -62%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=41, last 2 years)
1677 Points +225%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
542 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
516 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
516 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
406 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
397 Points -23%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
100 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=44, last 2 years)
4248 Points +1195%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points +323%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
577 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
328 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (n=1)
328 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points -29%

三星 三星 Exynos 1380依赖于 ARM Mali-G68 MP5GPU 作为图形处理器。因此，在我们的测试中，Galaxy A26 5G 取得了极具竞争力的成绩，再次接近 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Fusion, 小米 Poco X7和 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G及其 联发科 Dimensity 7300.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
783 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
631 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
860 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
640 Points -20%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3167 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3130 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3129 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2723 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2401 Points -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
87 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
87 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -13%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
114 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -20%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -15%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -19%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +13%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -23%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -23%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +21%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -18%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps +28%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps +12%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.5 fps -22%

使用Galaxy A26 5G 上网既快捷又方便。网站加载速度很快，很快就能显示出来。在浏览器基准测试中，三星智能手机是对比设备中速度最快的，但部分原因是其浏览器版本较新。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
121.837 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 121.8, n=6)
109.7 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
97.837 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
85.453 Points -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min +39%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
169 runs/min +33%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
130 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
127 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 127, n=5)
94.8 runs/min -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
77.4 runs/min -39%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
74.3 runs/min -41%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +52%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min +35%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
8.27 runs/min
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
8.19 runs/min -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (5.81 - 8.27, n=2)
7.04 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min -21%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
116 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
114 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=6)
110.7 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
109 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
38939 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
37452 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 38939, n=6)
35734 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
32736 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms * -39%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
1243.5 ms * -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (975 - 1209, n=6)
1128 ms * -16%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (Chrome 135)
1066.4 ms * -9%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (Chrome 135.0.7049.111)
975.3 ms *
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

尽管拥有 UFS 3.1 存储，但Galaxy A26 5G 并不是我们测试中速度最快的中端设备之一，这也是竞争对手在存储基准测试中遥遥领先的原因。但实际上，应用程序和游戏的加载速度仍然相对较快。

Samsung Galaxy A26 5GMotorola Edge 60 FusionNothing Phone (3a)Xiaomi Poco X7Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
183%
192%
139%
167%
174%
328%
Sequential Read 256KB
528.54
967.4
83%
1031.34
95%
947.4
79%
1009.67
91%
1585 ?(529 - 3134, n=61)
200%
2054 ?(270 - 4384, n=186, last 2 years)
289%
Sequential Write 256KB
251.43
908.8
261%
1001.28
298%
915.23
264%
833.64
232%
740 ?(233 - 1332, n=61)
194%
1667 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=186, last 2 years)
563%
Random Read 4KB
219.57
272.1
24%
245.48
12%
100.16
-54%
248.81
13%
243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=61)
11%
286 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years)
30%
Random Write 4KB
61.8
286.9
364%
285.24
362%
226.88
267%
266.92
332%
241 ?(61.8 - 503, n=61)
290%
327 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years)
429%

游戏 -Galaxy A26 5G 也能运行游戏

接下来，我们使用Gamebench 测试工具，测试了当前游戏在Galaxy A25 5G 上的运行情况。测试工具，这款智能手机的表现相当不错。对图形要求较高的冒险角色扮演游戏《源氏冲击》即使使用最高图形设置，每秒帧数也徘徊在 30 帧以上。平均帧数为每秒 34.1 帧，但帧数波动很大。另一方面，在运行图形较为简单的战术射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》时，情况看起来要稳定得多，在高清设置下，手机几乎能保持每秒 40 帧的帧率。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø56 (45-60)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø34.1 (25-42)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.7.0: Ø59.8 (56-60)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.7.0: Ø39.9 (35-41)

排放 - 不再有立体声扬声器

温度

即使在极端负荷下，我们使用 Burnout 基准模拟了 1 小时的压力测试，Galaxy A26 5G 也没有明显发热。正如 3DMark 压力测试所显示的，这款智能手机几乎可以在任何时候发挥其全部性能。

Max. Load
 42.9 °C41.6 °C37.7 °C 
 43.3 °C43 °C36.5 °C 
 43.2 °C42.8 °C35.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
36.2 °C40.8 °C43 °C
36.3 °C39.3 °C42.8 °C
34.6 °C40.1 °C41.4 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.1 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
%
0510152025Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.78 (4.76-4.79)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.18 (5.17-5.19)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.28 (6.27-6.29)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.86 (3.85-3.88)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5.05-5.07)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.03 (5.01-5.04)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.5 (16.4-16.7)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.6-18.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.8-23.9)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.9 (13.8-14)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.3-18.6)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.2 (16.1-16.3)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.7-25)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.58 (2.57-2.59)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.81 (2.8-2.81)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.53 (2.5-2.54)
三星Galaxy A26 5G
三星Galaxy A26 5G

发言人

Galaxy A26 5G 在一些方面比 Galaxy A25 5G.遗憾的是，扬声器并不是其中之一，因为 USB-C 端口旁边的扬声器不再受设备听筒的支持，这意味着不再能提供立体声音效。不过，单个扬声器还是能很好地完成其工作，并能以非常不同的方式再现语音和音乐。

外置扬声器或耳机可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.3 连接。它支持的蓝牙编解码器并不多，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC（三星无缝编解码器）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.842.42528.139.53124.435.34020.541.35029.541.46318.941.78017.740.210015.844.812513.445.816013.949.420011.251.325010.453.331511.757.840010.158.75008.863.96308.962.68009.270.610009.875.6125010.377.6160010.878200011.876.9250011.379.231501284.540001385500012.680.7630012.879.9800012.979.71000013.376.61250013.570.31600013.668.6SPL23.892.1N0.585.8median 11.8median 75.6Delta1.59.93340.927.536.622.83926.33936.437.721.137.320.739.219.641.412.643.116.350.316.35113.153.512.458.31062.110.870.912.473.211.975.811.681.312.483.411.679.111.379.811.977.612.17913.182.913.180.913.78013.375.113.670.613.772.814.268.824.691.50.689.5median 12.6median 75.11.19hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A26 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Galaxy A26 5G 配备 5000 毫安时电池

耗电量

Galaxy A26 5G 的 5000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 25 瓦，但您必须自行购买合适的电源。我们使用的是 100 瓦的 Anker 317 电源。在我们的测试中，一个完整的充电周期正好需要 80 分钟。充电到 50% 需要 28 分钟，充电到 80% 需要 49 分钟。

三星智能手机的耗电量并不明显，但与技术上相似的中端对比设备相比，它的耗电量要高一些。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.17 / 1.94 / 2.03 Watt
Load midlight 4.31 / 11.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
5200 mAh		Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
31%
25%
15%
26%
21%
-36%
4%
Idle Minimum *
1.17
1
15%
0.93
21%
1
15%
1.09
7%
1.17
-0%
1.085 ?(0.75 - 1.37, n=6)
7%
0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=159, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Average *
1.94
1.3
33%
1.67
14%
1.5
23%
1.28
34%
1.38
29%
2.85 ?(1.5 - 5.37, n=6)
-47%
1.415 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
1.6
21%
1.68
17%
1.7
16%
1.31
35%
1.41
31%
2.99 ?(1.62 - 5.44, n=6)
-47%
1.556 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years)
23%
Load Average *
4.31
2.9
33%
3.69
14%
4.6
-7%
3.25
25%
3.58
17%
8.03 ?(3.6 - 15.8, n=6)
-86%
7.04 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=150, last 2 years)
-63%
Load Maximum *
11.79
5.6
53%
4.75
60%
8.3
30%
8.62
27%
8.44
28%
12.5 ?(8.93 - 15.9, n=6)
-6%
10.6 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=150, last 2 years)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.98 (1.395-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.14 (0.99-8.34)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.51 (1.223-7.48)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.483 (1.467-1.616)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.165 (0.999-1.832)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.43 (4.06-5.75)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.48 (4.2-5.28)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.19-3.82)
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.483 (1.467-1.616)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.165 (0.999-1.832)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.958-2.99)

运行时间

Galaxy A26 5G 一次充电可使用一整天，即使在高强度使用的情况下也是如此。即便如此，它的电池测试结果仍无法接近竞争对手的数值。不过，在模拟网上冲浪超过 12 小时、播放高清视频近 19 小时的情况下，Galaxy A26 5G 的续航时间比 A25 5G 稍长。 Galaxy A25 5G.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 07min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 9min
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
5200 mAh		Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
32%
-8%
42%
18%
Reader / Idle
1987
1966
-1%
2567
29%
1763
-11%
1754
-12%
H.264
1122
1161
3%
1610
43%
941
-16%
1423
27%
WiFi v1.3
739
1023
38%
1233
67%
770
4%
1049
42%
1206
63%
Load
249
329
32%
218
-12%
228
-8%
236
-5%

Notebookcheck 总评分

三星Galaxy A26 5G 是一款不错的中端智能手机，因其强大的功能和长期的软件支持而备受好评。尽管存在一些小缺点，但它仍能为日常使用提供良好的性能。

Samsung Galaxy A26 5G - 05/13/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
12 / 55 → 21%
Application Performance
60 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
72%
Average
73%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
91.7%
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 81.5%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.6%
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $2.94
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Samsung ...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 299€		200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
2.
77.1%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Anoowkoa 2 pack for Moto Edg...
2. $9.88
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr...
3. $8.99
QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Motoro...
List Price: 329€		178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1200
445 PPI
P-OLED
3.
79.2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
2. $4.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
201 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
387 PPI
AMOLED
4.
84.5% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon: $259.99
List Price: 299€		197 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"
2340x1080
396 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $6.79
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Poco X7 ...
3. $6.64
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi Poc...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
6.
77.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
3. $4.73
Aiziki 2 Pack for Redmi Note...
List Price: 400€		190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 全新Galaxy A 智能手机为中端手机带来了一股清新之风：三星Galaxy A26 5G 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-05-13 (Update: 2025-05-13)