华为MatePad Paper评测--E Ink平板电脑可以处理Android 应用程序

Name: Huawei MatePad Paper
Brand: Huawei

Papier很有耐心。 MatePad Paper是一款与众不同的平板电脑。黑白的E Ink显示屏确保了这一点。然而，你也可以安装Android 应用程序。我们在测试中评估MatePad Paper是否适合日常使用。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/02/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Tablet Touchscreen

能够像在纸上写字一样，但使用一个数字平板电脑，你也可以用来冲浪，而且也非常适合阅读文本：这正是华为MatePad Paper的概念，它配备了一个E Ink Carta显示屏。

由于屏幕只能显示16级灰色，而且反应相当慢，MatePad Paper不是所有使用场景的最佳选择。然而，从理论上讲，你可以在该平板电脑上运行许多应用程序。

这是一个有趣的概念。我们将在测试中仔细观察，评估它是否适合日常使用。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MatePad Paper (MatePad Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 820e 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP6

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.30 inch 4:3, 1872 x 1404 pixel 227 PPI, E-Ink, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: position sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.65 x 225.2 x 182.7

Battery

3625 mAh Lithium-Ion, 22.5 Watt charging

Operating System

Huawei HarmonyOS

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers, charger, digitizer pen, folio cover, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

360 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.4 %	08/2022	Huawei MatePad Paper Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6	360 g	6.65 mm	10.30"	1872x1404
82.5 %	07/2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	465 g	7.45 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
87.6 %	12/2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
88.5 %	10/2021	Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	487 g	7.5 mm	10.20"	2160x1620

外壳 - E Ink平板电脑中经济实惠的塑料

华为将10.3英寸的E Ink显示屏放在一个塑料外壳中。虽然这不一定是件坏事，但我们并不喜欢在这种情况下选择塑料。虽然背面提供了一个轻微的表面结构，但它并不显得质量特别高，而且也相当滑溜。同时，我们可以感觉到一些明显的尖锐边缘，当你把平板电脑拿在手里阅读时，会变得特别不舒服。

重量在这里也起到了一定的作用。尽管MatePad Paper的重量为360克（约12.7盎司），对于一个10.3英寸的平板电脑来说是比较轻的，但如果你连续看几个小时的书，你在购买之前就应该意识到，你必须要比小的电子阅读器承受更多的重量。MatePad Paper一侧的屏幕周围有一个稍大的边框。这确实是有道理的，因为你希望能够像书一样把它举起来，而不至于经常意外地触发触摸屏。

这款箱子的稳定性令人信服。尽管它的尺寸很大，但它几乎不能被扭曲，也不会吱吱作响。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Pad 5 Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Apple iPad 2021 Huawei MatePad Paper DIN A5 ❌

设备 - 适当的储存

64GB的存储空间应该可以容纳大量的电子书，但也可以容纳一些应用程序。由于你不能用它来拍照，而且视频在黑白显示屏上也没有意义，所以存储空间应该足以满足日常使用。

没有微型SD卡读卡器。

软件 - 可以安装Android 应用程序

MatePad Paper使用HarmonyOS 2.1.0，当然是调整后的版本。例如，有一个特殊的开始屏幕，主要强调平板电脑的电子书功能，并提供对调整后的应用程序的快速访问。最初，选择范围相当小，仅限于一些大型日报的应用和办公应用。对于讲德语的用户来说，Tolino应用程序也是一种奖励。

由于美国的贸易限制，华为仍然无法使用谷歌服务，即使HarmonyOS是基于Android ，许多谷歌应用也无法在平板电脑上运行。虽然其他一些Android ，但你可以相当容易地使用另一个应用程序商店，如APKPure，安装它们。例如，我们能够让大部分的基准测试运行，没有任何问题，亚马逊Kindle应用程序也可以安装。然而，在法律方面，制造商在一个灰色地带运作，所以用户应该意识到这一点。

还有一个集成的书店，你可以使用华为的账户购买书籍。虽然实际上有德语和英语书籍可供选择，也有许多免费书籍，但你会徒劳地寻找一些真正的大片，如《哈利-波特》。畅销书列表看起来也有点奇怪，并没有真正反映当前的图书市场。

你可以把你的书以pdf或epub的形式存储在你自己的独立书架上，没有任何麻烦。还有一个集成的翻译工具，可以选择将文本翻译成相应的语言。虽然这并不完美，就像机器翻译的通常情况一样，但它仍然工作得足够好。

那些也有华为宇宙的其他设备的人也可以相当容易地从智能手机或MateBook中传输内容，例如。在我们测试的时候，系统软件的安全补丁处于2022年5月1日的水平，所以它们不再是完全最新的。不幸的是，目前没有关于未来更新的信息。

通信和GNSS - MatePad中的快速WLAN

不幸的是，你不得不在MatePad Paper中没有移动通信连接。相反，你得到了快速的WiFi 6，相应的调制解调器实现了非常好的传输速率，在我们使用华硕ROG AXE11000参考路由器的测试中也保持不变。在实践中，我们也可以证明使用华为平板电脑的下载速度非常快。

E Ink平板电脑无法确定其位置，甚至无法向应用程序提供一个大致的位置。我们还安装了华为的花瓣地图，它不使用谷歌服务，但这也无法确定自己的位置。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	635 (320^min - 652^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	587 (290^min - 624^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	538 (317^min - 618^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	485 (191^min - 554^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	928 (812^min - 949^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	347 (335^min - 351^max) MBit/s -63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	945 (826^min - 958^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 (167^min - 354^max) MBit/s -63%

Huawei MatePad Paper; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (812-949)

Huawei MatePad Paper; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø945 (826-958)

附件和保修 - 包括大量的附件

华为MatePad Paper包括M-Pencil输入笔和一个折叠盖。然而，该笔套可以更好地固定MatePad Paper，并且不提供站立位置。

盒子里还包括一条USB线、两个替换笔尖和一个22.5瓦的充电器。想购买额外输入笔的人必须在华为支付99欧元（约101美元）。

在欧盟内部，华为为平板电脑提供24个月的保修期，如果出现制造故障，你可以在头6个月内申请充电器的保修事件。

输入设备和操作 - 带有指纹传感器

MatePad Paper提供了一个经典的触摸屏，也可以使用附带的M-Pencil输入笔来操作。电子墨水显示屏的一个很大的缺点是它的反应时间慢，而且输入的延迟时间也很长。有时甚至需要一秒钟才能在显示屏上看到输入，这对使用键盘的有经验的打字员来说特别令人讨厌。同时，使用M-Pencil的输入延迟几乎不明显（华为规定的延迟为26毫秒），允许你流畅地做笔记，感觉真的像在纸上做笔记。

当然，华为MatePad Paper主要是为了阅读或做笔记或创建草图。如果你想做笔记，你可以使用随附的Note应用程序，但这时你只能用M-Pencil来书写，而不是用手指。手写输入的识别率出奇地高，即使你的笔迹非常糟糕，也能自动转变成文字。此外，你还可以录制音频片段并附上图片。

待机键包括一个指纹识别器，它需要一秒钟才能可靠地解锁平板电脑。当平板电脑被锁定时，你还可以用屏幕上的笔做快速笔记。

显示 - 不寻常，不适合每一种情况

很难将 E Ink 显示屏与其他平板电脑进行比较，看看我们的显微镜图片也可以看出这一点。没有彩色子像素的网格，但显示屏由包含黑色和白色颗粒的独立单元组成，这些颗粒具有相反的电荷。根据是否有正电荷或负电荷，你可以看到黑色或白色颗粒。下面的视频相当好地说明了它是如何工作的。

尽管目前也有第一款彩色E Ink显示屏，但MatePad Paper使用的是经典的黑白屏幕，能够显示16种灰色调。该显示屏提供LED背景照明，在我们的测试中能够达到69.5 cd/m²的最大亮度。虽然这听起来不多，但哑光表面和高对比度允许在明亮的环境中阅读而不需要任何照明。因此，你真的只需要在黑暗的房间里启动照明，在那里是完全足够的。

1872 x 1404像素，分辨率大约相当于全高清水平，4:3格式的显示屏在处理文件时效果非常好。然而，图像往往看起来分辨率较低，但这主要是由于在只有16个灰度级别显示时，阴影显得相当粗糙的事实。


56.9 cd/m²	59.4 cd/m²	56.9 cd/m²
60.1 cd/m²	61.9 cd/m²	55.8 cd/m²
62.9 cd/m²	69.5 cd/m²	59.4 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 69.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 60.3 cd/m² Minimum: 0.08 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 61.9 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.02

	Huawei MatePad Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00	Apple iPad 2021 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Screen		377%	366%	381%
Brightness middle	61.9	510 724%	491 693%	507 719%
Brightness	60	480 700%	473 688%	491 718%
Brightness Distribution	80	85 6%	91 14%	90 13%
Black Level *		0.49	0.87	0.5
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.1	2.2 76%	3 67%	2.4 74%
Gamma	2.02 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6848 ^95%	6907 ^94%	7182 ^91%	6923 ^94%
Contrast		1041	564	1014
Colorchecker dE 2000 *		1.8	1.9	1.7
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *		3.7	4.1	3.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度等级的低数量也导致我们在用光谱光度计进行测试时出现相当高的偏差。然而，当照明被关闭时，屏幕仍然成功地显示出良好的黑色，而白色区域看起来总是有点灰暗。

由于其技术的原因，该显示屏不使用PWM，一旦呈现出一页文字，就不需要刷新，直到你换到下一页。根据华为的说法，显示屏的响应时间是根据内容动态调整的，但在我们对对比度丰富的GIF的测试中，它们相当缓慢，这也解释了触摸屏的输入滞后。

不时地，也会有一些之前内容的重影留下，但你可以通过手动刷新屏幕来消除这一点。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 47 ms rise
94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 47 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
121 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 61 ms rise
121 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 60 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

如前所述，该显示屏非常适用于在户外使用，即使阳光直射当然还是会导致一些反射，因此应该避免。

视角非常完美，图像不会因为不同的视角而改变。

性能 - 绝对足够

华为使用麒麟820e作为MatePad Paper的SoC。它的最高频率为2.22GHz，其时钟速度略低于麒麟820.对于其价格级别，该SoC实现了平均性能值。然而，限制因素应该是E Ink显示屏的缓慢响应时间，所以更快的SoC在这里几乎不会带来任何优势。但大多数应用程序在平板电脑上都能顺利运行。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021	1328 Points +135%
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points +39%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad Paper	566 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	566 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	343 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021	3235 Points +75%
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points +27%
Huawei MatePad Paper	1853 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	1853 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1247 Points -33%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021	622382 Points +117%
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points +100%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points +58%
Huawei MatePad Paper	287379 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	287379 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	211417 Points -26%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021	842 Points +53%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points +22%
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points +15%
Huawei MatePad Paper	552 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	552 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points +43%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad Paper	3598 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	3598 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2134 Points -41%
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad Paper	5987 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	5987 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	4133 Points -31%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points +47%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad Paper	3930 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	3930 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2436 Points -38%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points +75%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Paper	5893 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	5893 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1786 Points -70%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad Paper	1209 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	1209 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1186 Points -2%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5	46413 Points +805%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	6865 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6865, n=6, last 2 years)	5427 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad Paper	5128 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	5128 Points 0%
Apple iPad 2021	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points +118%
Huawei MatePad Paper	4078 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	4078 Points 0%

Legend

Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e

Average of class Tablet

芯片ARM Mali-G57 MP6是一个中端GPU，对于游戏中的最高要求来说太慢了。但由于高端游戏在缓慢的黑白显示屏上无论如何都没有意义，图形性能在日常操作中完全足够。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1872 Points +207%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points +59%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	609 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	171 Points -72%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	1992 Points +219%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points +58%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	625 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	176 Points -72%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7858 Points +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points +82%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1886 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	691 Points -63%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	7457 Points +287%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points +78%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1925 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	687 Points -64%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6981 Points +63%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	5362 Points +25%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4281 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1355 Points -68%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	9773 Points +119%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8202 Points +83%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4472 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1875 Points -58%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4590 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3725 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2564 Points -31%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	2078 Points -44%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5000 Points +44%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3476 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1364 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6876 Points +78%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3869 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1197 Points -69%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2698 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2564 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2558 Points 0%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2571 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1384 Points -46%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2675 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1182 Points -56%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2587 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2262 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +460%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +200%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +95%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	307 fps +198%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +79%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	103 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +225%
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +200%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +5%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	167 fps +165%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +73%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps -62%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	57 fps +185%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	110 fps +150%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +77%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -68%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	43 fps +153%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +47%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	69 fps +229%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +124%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	35 fps +169%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +31%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	31 fps +210%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +80%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps -68%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	50 fps +163%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +37%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	82 fps +183%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +62%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -70%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	2965 Points +146%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1203 Points

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29.75 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34.85 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29.45 fps

Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33.39 fps

另一方面，MatePad Paper在上网时最好不要表现出任何弱点，因为这是该平板电脑的核心任务之一。基准测试显示，这款平板电脑的成绩略低于平均水平，在滚动时，你必须习惯略微卡顿的图像流。然而，页面基本上渲染得相当快，图像也加载得很快。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	142.2 Points +153%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points +51%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points +30%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	56.217 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	56.2 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	32.868 Points -42%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	202 Points +135%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points +40%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	96 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	86 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	86 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	46 Points -47%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	171 runs/min +401%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min +126%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min +80%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	34.1 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	34.1 runs/min 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	21.8 runs/min -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	47288 Points +152%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points +52%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	18755 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	18755 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	12744 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	3227.4 ms * -48%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -48%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	2174.3 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 820e ()	2174 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * +26%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)	545 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

UFS存储显示了自己的良好水平，能够快速提供数据，因此也可以认为是快速的。

	Huawei MatePad Paper	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	Xiaomi Pad 5	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-50%	51%	11%	26%
Sequential Read 256KB	880.1	393.23 -55%	1459 66%	758 ?(485 - 940, n=17) -14%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) -3%
Sequential Write 256KB	256.2	234.88 -8%	534 108%	400 ?(120.6 - 519, n=17) 56%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 108%
Random Read 4KB	145.6	75.12 -48%	208.7 43%	154.9 ?(88.5 - 220, n=17) 6%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) 15%
Random Write 4KB	183.1	23.97 -87%	158.9 -13%	176.3 ?(95.4 - 216, n=17) -4%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -18%

游戏--动作游戏几乎没有任何意义

使用没有彩色显示的E Ink屏幕和非常缓慢的响应时间，快速动作游戏几乎没有任何意义。然而，你可以使用该屏幕来显示更简单的游戏，如纸牌游戏，没有任何问题。

在我们对PUBG移动动作游戏的测试中，这款平板电脑的最高帧率达到20帧。我们用GameBench的软件测量帧率。.虽然这还只是勉强可以玩，但并不怎么有趣。

触摸屏的准确性是足够的，但你应该考虑到输入滞后的问题，这样你就会不时地不知道一个命令是否真的被执行。

Huawei MatePad Paper; Smooth; 2.1.0: Ø19.7 (10-20)

Huawei MatePad Paper; HD; 2.1.0: Ø19.7 (19-20)

排放--MatePad Paper没有节流功能

温度

即使在重载的情况下，平板电脑也只是在一些局部的地方发热，即使如此也只是在背部发热到40℃（104°F）。

因此，机箱的升温是没有问题的，3DMark基准测试的压力测试也表明，在较长的负载下保持SoC的性能没有问题。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)

Max. Load

Idle


37.7 °C	31.5 °C	26.8 °C
28.8 °C	27.1 °C	28.1 °C
26.4 °C	26.4 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 28.8 °C


26.6 °C	30.1 °C	40 °C
28.8 °C	28.8 °C	28.2 °C
26.8 °C	27.3 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 29.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

华为在其E Ink平板电脑中使用立体声扬声器。这些扬声器可以让你轻松地听有声读物，而音乐也听起来相当得体。声音被清晰地再现，如果你把平板电脑拿在手里，你甚至可以感觉到一些低音。对于一个中等规模的房间来说，最大音量是绝对足够的。

虽然我们在测试中无法通过适配器使用USB-C端口连接3.5毫米的耳机，但通过蓝牙工作没有任何问题。由于贸易限制，使用aptX编解码器是不可能的，但我们在测试中仍然从蓝牙耳机获得了一些好的声音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MatePad Paper audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--电池很小，但电池寿命很好

消耗功率

在激活背景照明和没有额外负载的情况下，耗电量自然低于竞争对手。即使在负载情况下，该平板电脑的耗电量也相对较小，但电池也明显小于传统平板电脑。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 1.2 / 1.7 Watt
Load	3.4 / 5.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh
Power Consumption		-121%	-136%	-254%
Idle Minimum *	0.6	0.94 -57%	0.99 -65%	1.3 -117%
Idle Average *	1.2	4.22 -252%	4.2 -250%	7.5 -525%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	4.37 -157%	4.22 -148%	7.58 -346%
Load Average *	3.4	6.12 -80%	7.88 -132%	10.03 -195%
Load Maximum *	5.8	9.14 -58%	10.63 -83%	10.91 -88%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei MatePad Paper: Ø3.43 (1.61-6.78)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei MatePad Paper; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.61 (3.13-5.18)

Huawei MatePad Paper; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.01 (0.644-1.696)

电池寿命

我们无法像往常一样进行经典的网上冲浪电池测试，因为它规定了150cd/m²的显示亮度，而华为MatePad Paper无法达到。

如果定期更换页面，该平板电脑在全亮度下可持续使用约8小时。如果关闭照明，时间大约增加一倍。

如果不刷新屏幕，只要背景照明和通信模块保持关闭，该平板电脑就不会消耗任何电力。因此，如果你做出相应的调整，你可以让平板电脑待机数周，之后继续保持几乎相同的电池水平。

该平板电脑的充电功率为22.5瓦，最多两小时就能将3.625毫安时的电池完全充满。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 03min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 9min

	Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh
Battery Runtime		71%	89%	70%
Reader / Idle	963	2373 146%	2641 174%	2292 138%
Load	249	239 -4%	257 3%	253 2%
H.264		1151	1000	898
WiFi v1.3		909	733	805

Pros

+ 文字的图像清晰度很高

+ 即使在明亮的环境中，也能轻松阅读显示内容

+ 包括输入笔和盖子

+ 高质量的扬声器

+ 快速的WLAN

+ 没有PWM闪烁

+ 日常使用时，电池寿命合适

+ Android 可以安装应用程序

Cons

- 没有谷歌服务

- 显示器的反应时间慢

- 耳机只能通过蓝牙连接

- 对视频或游戏的使用非常有限

- 材料选择不当

- 没有摄像头

- 没有定位功能

结论 - 不寻常的概念，有利有弊

华为MatePad Paper是一款有趣的设备。它提供了无可比拟的文本可读性，非常适用于明亮的环境，通过M-Pencil带来了一个伟大的输入笔，并提供了绝对足够的性能值来实现流畅的系统操作。电池寿命在实践中也是合适的，甚至相当长，如果用户相应调整他们的行为。另外一个优点是快速和稳定的无线网络。

材料的选择和明显的尖锐边缘有点令人讨厌，华为本可以在这方面做出更好的努力，因为你希望能够长时间地拿着一个同时作为电子阅读器的平板电脑。另一个因素是相对较高的重量，如果你想要一个大的显示屏，你可能不得不期待。

还有一个问题是，当图像被频繁更换时，E Ink显示屏的使用寿命有多长，目前几乎没有这方面的经验。制造商提到了10年的使用时间，但前提是它经常被用作电子阅读器，每页只刷新一次图像。

MatePad Paper是一款快速的E Ink平板电脑，适合所有在明亮环境中大量阅读，并希望不时在平板电脑上做一些笔记的人。不过，华为本可以在外壳上多注意一些。

那些不寻找经典屏幕的平板电脑的人也可以在其他几个E Ink替代品中选择：例如，亚马逊的经典电子书阅读器，如Kindle Oasis，可从 250美元。但它们没有笔输入的选项，软件也没有那么多功能。

凭借其Note Air2（可从亚马逊购买，价格为480美元)，中国制造商Boox提供了一个与MatePad Paper相当类似的替代品，在那里你甚至可以使用一些变通方法安装谷歌游戏商店。通过Elipsa (亚马逊售价350美元起)，电子阅读器专家Kobo也提供了一款E Ink平板电脑，但它是用专有软件交付的，不允许安装应用程序。

价格和可用性

MatePad Paper在欧洲的售价为499欧元（约合511美元），。.在美国，它可以从Good-E-Reader，起价719美元。.

Huawei MatePad Paper - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

72 / 80 → 90%

Pointing Device

80%

Connectivity

28 / 70 → 40%

Weight

85 / 40-88 → 95%

Battery

80%

Display

68%

Games Performance

41 / 78 → 53%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 81%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Average

68%

79%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 508 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MatePad Paper评测--E Ink平板电脑可以处理Android 应用程序

Florian Schmitt, 2022-08- 2 (Update: 2022-08- 2)