Notebookcheck Logo

华为 MatePad 11.5 评测--低价高效的平板电脑

和谐平板电脑 华为 MatePad 11.5 配备了大尺寸 IPS 显示屏，使用现代的骁龙 7 处理器，存储空间充足。华为还提供一支笔和一个键盘盖。虽然你不得不使用谷歌服务，但这对于一款高效的平板电脑来说并不是什么大问题。
Android Touchscreen Tablet
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

华为 MatePad 11.5 与 MatePad 11.5 相比，尺寸略大，价格更实惠。 MatePad 11.正如其名称所示，它配备了 11.5 英寸显示屏，还支持使用有源输入笔进行输入。两种机型的内部存储容量都是 128 GB，用户可以选择 6 或 8 GB 内存。基本版本的建议零售价为 299 欧元（约合人民币 323 元），较大型号的售价为 429 欧元（约合人民币 463 元），后者包括包装盒中的键盘盖。

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (MatePad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 644
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.50 inch 3:2, 2200 x 1440 pixel 229 PPI, capacitive, multi touch, 10 points, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.37 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Hall sensor, accelerometer, orientation sensor, OTG, Connector for keyboard
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.85 x 260.88 x 176.82
Battery
7700 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8, AF), Camera2 API level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, FF)
Additional features
Keyboard: Onscreen, 18W charger, USB cable, Harmony OS 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, fanless
Weight
499 g, Power Supply: 71 g
Price
299 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.5 %
09/2023
Huawei MatePad 11.5
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		499 g6.85 mm11.50"2200x1440
82.4 %
04/2023
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		520 g7.4 mm11.50"2000x1200
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2		508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
84.6 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		445 g7.05 mm10.61"2000x1200

外壳 - MatePad 11.5 铝壳

华为 MatePad 11.5 只提供灰色，采用哑光铝合金一体成型外壳。平板电脑纤薄舒适，重量不大，拿在手中给人一种高品质的感觉。

MatePad 的做工非常出色，少数几种材料的过渡均匀而紧密。我们尝试翘起它时只产生了极小的吱吱声，面板在受压时也没有任何反应。屏占比高达 85%，这也是一个非常不错的数值。

MatePad 11.5 的电池集成在外壳中，用户无法取出。华为平板电脑不提供任何特殊的防尘或防水保护。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
269 mm 169 mm 7.4 mm 520 g260.88 mm 176.82 mm 6.85 mm 499 g250.38 mm 157.98 mm 7.05 mm 445 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

设备 - 华为平板电脑没有带来任何惊喜

尽管 MatePad 11.5 在同价位产品中提供了非常扎实的基本连接设备，但它并不包括音频端口、可选的 microSD 卡存储扩展或 NFC。

USB-2.0 连接不支持有线图像输出，但在拷贝测试中达到了 37.1 MB/s，工作速度相对不错。此外，该连接还支持 OTG，可以顺利连接外部输入、音频或存储设备。在外部存储介质方面，支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。

顶部（横向）：音量、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部（横向格式）：音量、麦克风
左（横向格式）：扬声器、电源（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
左侧（横向格式）：扬声器、电源
右（横向）：扬声器、USB、扬声器（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧（横向格式）：扬声器、USB、扬声器
底部（横向格式）：键盘连接器（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部（横向格式）：键盘接口

软件 - 配备 Harmony OS 3.1 的 MatePad

华为 MatePad 11.5 使用基于 OpenAndroid 12 的 Harmony OS 3.1 操作系统。平板电脑上找不到谷歌服务及其相应的应用程序，华为使用自己的 AppGallery 代替。在这里找不到的应用程序可以通过 Petal Search 在互联网上搜索，然后通过相应的网站安装。不过，通过这种方式搜索不到的应用程序仍然会有一些空白，而且通过花瓣搜索进行安装对于技术水平不高的用户来说也不一定容易。

幸运的是，华为仍然为平板电脑提供了 DRM 认证，允许以高清分辨率显示相应的受保护内容。虽然这在 Netflix 上运行良好，但在 Disney+ 上，该应用却抱怨缺少谷歌服务而拒绝运行。同样可以通过浏览器运行的电视台或其他媒体内容则不受影响。

通过拖放功能将两个应用程序相邻显示，并在它们之间直接移动内容，这是一项提高工作效率的实用功能。此外，您还可以在可移动和可扩展的窗口中运行应用程序，不过前者只适用于经过相应优化的应用程序。

通信 - 配备快速 Wi-Fi 6，但没有全球导航卫星系统

华为 MatePad 11.5 支持快速 Wi-Fi 6（IEEE-802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax），这在（目前）这个价位的产品中并不多见。虽然与华硕 ROG GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接时数据传输速率并不总是很稳定，但该平板电脑的数据传输速率也相应较快。但由于下降幅度并不大，在日常操作中很难察觉。华为可能还会在未来的软件更新中带来一些改进。

两个麦克风和前置摄像头在视频通话中给人留下了良好的印象。在安静的环境中，我们很容易听懂，语音传输也很清晰。

MatePad 11.5 没有 LTE 或甚至 5G 选项，也没有卫星定位功能。

Networking
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
846 (min: 507) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
792 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
409 (min: 366) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
493 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
325 (min: 163) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
349 (min: 178) MBit/s ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
367 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼47%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø846 (507-927)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø408 (366-434)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø792 (376-968)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø493 (433-516)

超高清视频摄像机

用 MatePad 11.5 自拍
用 MatePad 11.5 自拍

前置摄像头的分辨率为 800 万像素，只能使用固定焦距。该摄像头非常适合全高清分辨率的视频通话。

主摄像头采用 1300 万像素传感器，提供自动对焦功能。该镜头非常适合偶尔拍摄快照或进行文档记录。 但除此之外，其功能非常有限，因为即使是 2 倍变焦的图像也不再具有吸引力，而且在光线不足的条件下，相机很快就会达到极限。

录制的视频最多只能达到超高清分辨率，也可以达到全高清或 720p。所有分辨率的格式比例均为 16:9，帧频固定为 30 FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light
click to load images

在可控光线条件下，MatePad 11.5 的主摄像头色彩还原相当自然，只有深绿色（dE 11.3）、深紫色（dE 11.4）和深灰色调出现了较明显的偏差。

我们的测试图表再现了中心区域的许多细节，而边缘区域的锐度则有所下降。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 11.5: 7.34 ∆E min: 2.84 - max: 14.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.1 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad 11.5: 47.01 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 - 还可选配键盘和笔

基本版本的华为 MatePad 11.5 随附一条 USB 线缆（Type-A 到 Type-C）和模块化充电器，充电能力最高可达 18 瓦。

您还可以选择购买有源输入笔（建议零售价 99 欧元，约合人民币 107 元）和键盘盖（建议零售价 129 欧元，约合人民币 139 元），后者也有捆绑版本。

华为为其平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

输入设备和操作 - MatePad 11.5 仅支持面部识别

华为 MatePad 11.5 拥有可靠的触摸屏，在我们的测试中运行非常准确，甚至支持华为 M Pencil 形式的有源输入笔。它可以通过蓝牙连接到平板电脑，据说延迟很低，支持 4096 级压力。遗憾的是，我们在测试中没有使用这支笔。

可选的智能键盘由一个平板电脑外壳组成，键盘可通过磁力吸附在外壳上。QWERTY 键盘布局与较小的笔记本电脑一致，按键大小舒适，键程较短。按键可被平板电脑可靠识别并快速执行，带来流畅的输入体验。键盘不提供触摸板。

MatePad 11.5 没有配备指纹传感器，但你可以使用人脸识别来防止未经授权的访问。尽管这样做不太安全，但也达到了目的，在我们的测试中运行非常可靠。您最多可以存储五个面部配置文件，允许几个人同时使用平板电脑。

显示屏 - 配备无 PWM 的 IPS 显示屏的华为平板电脑

子像素网格
子像素网格

华为 MatePad 11.5 的 IPS 显示屏尺寸为 11.5 英寸（29.21 厘米，391平方厘米），刷新率高达 120 赫兹。刷新率可以由系统动态调节，用户也可以将其固定为 60 或 120 Hz。在 HDR 方面，标称支持 HLG 和 HDR10。

在激活光传感器的情况下，屏幕中央的亮度达到 472 cd/m2，面板亮度仅比未激活光传感器的情况下（461cd/m2）略高。APL 测量值也处于类似水平。

一个积极的方面是，华为没有使用 PWM 来控制亮度。在最低显示亮度下，我们只注意到高频率的闪烁，完全没有理由担心。

420
cd/m²		446
cd/m²		406
cd/m²
437
cd/m²		472
cd/m²		413
cd/m²
443
cd/m²		447
cd/m²		408
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 432.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 472 cd/m²
Contrast: 1073:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.41
Huawei MatePad 11.5
IPS, 2200x1440, 11.50		Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.50		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50		Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Screen
-11%
-44%
17%
Brightness middle
472
423
-10%
368
-22%
418
-11%
Brightness
432
396
-8%
346
-20%
402
-7%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
91
6%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.44
0.29
34%
0.61
-39%
0.28
36%
Contrast
1073
1459
36%
603
-44%
1493
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.4
5.32
-56%
6.9
-103%
2.3
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.6
9.87
-50%
11.4
-73%
5.4
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
6.6
-38%
7.7
-60%
3.7
23%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.159 102%
2.16 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
7035 92%
7979 81%
8547 76%
6595 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 178800 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 178800 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 178800 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS 显示屏的黑度值还算不错，对比度清晰。不过 Tab P11还表明，它甚至可以做得更好。

为了获得尽可能自然的色彩还原，必须在显示设置中将色温设置为暖色调，但即便如此，仍会出现明显的轻微青色色调。在色彩校准方面，肯定还有一些改进的余地，但只有在并排观看时才能真正注意到目标色彩的明显差异。

灰度（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
13.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.798 ms rise
↘ 8.953 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.27 ms rise
↘ 17.43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

要在户外使用华为 MatePad 11.5，需要找个阴凉的地方。尽管面板在明亮的环境中仍可阅读，但显示屏很快就会达到极限，尤其是反光会让使用变得非常困难。

户外活动（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
户外活动（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）

华为 MatePad 11.5 的视角稳定性令人信服：色彩还原几乎没有明显变化，只有亮度在陡峭视角下略有下降。平板电脑没有明显的光晕。

华为 MatePad 11.5 的视角稳定性
华为 MatePad 11.5 的视角稳定性

性能 - 骁龙 7 代 1，6GB 内存

华为 MatePad 11.5 采用了 骁龙 7 代 1运行，配备 6GB 或 8GB 工作内存，我们的测试机是较小的版本。

CPU 速度达到了预期水平，系统运行非常流畅。只有在人工智能基准测试中，结果相当不理想。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (775 - 826, n=4)
793 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
781 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
558 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
490 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2854 - 3094, n=4)
2943 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2854 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1889 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
1797 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points -57%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1038 - 1119, n=4)
1068 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1059 Points
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)
812 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2601 - 3261, n=4)
2974 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2970 Points
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)
2287 Points -23%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (544011 - 593635, n=5)
568349 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
556242 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)
453858 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
316212 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
312314 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points -64%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (10389 - 12632, n=5)
11891 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
10389 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
9578 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9475 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points -28%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4784 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4296 - 4795, n=5)
4622 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)
3631 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2988 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
2855 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points -62%
System
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9716 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (8634 - 10067, n=5)
9335 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)
6543 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
6509 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
5261 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points -51%
Memory
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4970 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (3640 - 4970, n=5)
4468 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)
4284 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
3550 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
3454 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points -80%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7612 - 8150, n=5)
7760 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7739 Points
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)
6639 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2875 Points -63%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
2762 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points -74%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1330 - 1525, n=5)
1418 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1402 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
1325 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)
1205 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1201 Points -14%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (668 - 47384, n=4)
34697 Points +5094%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)
5325 Points +697%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
892 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
877 Points +31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
668 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7374 - 29413, n=5)
12886 Points +43%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
9218 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9213 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9027 Points
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)
8899 Points -1%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
 
Average of class Tablet

骁龙 644Adreno 644MatePad 11.5 中的 Adreno 644 确保了在我们的对比领域中具有较高的图形处理速度，尽管它仍处于中端水平。由于显示屏分辨率较高，屏幕测试结果比使用相同 SoC 的智能手机要低。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points -78%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points -59%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points -78%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3164 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1215 Points -62%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1109 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points -78%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3157 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1242 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points -77%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6367 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2644 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points -77%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7147 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2442 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points -82%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4608 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
150 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -56%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps -71%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -62%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -77%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps -63%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -61%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -79%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps -68%

华为平板电脑的浏览器基准测试结果相当不错，远高于同价位的其他平板电脑。我们使用微软 Edge 浏览器进行了测试，因为它的测试结果明显高于华为浏览器。不过，从主观角度来看，后者也可以流畅地上网冲浪。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (64.3 - 115.8, n=5)
90.3 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
86.231 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)
84.9 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)
55.947 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
55.842 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points -49%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
91 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)
85.7 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (58 - 92, n=5)
77.8 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)
57 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
56 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)
77.2 runs/min +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (61.5 - 87.4, n=5)
69.5 runs/min +13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
61.5 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
38.1 runs/min -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chome 112)
31 runs/min -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
30021 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (21143 - 34866, n=5)
29627 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
17557 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)
17239 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * -135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * -124%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
2443.7 ms * -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)
2268.5 ms * -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1208 - 2686, n=5)
1574 ms * -15%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
1365.8 ms *

* ... smaller is better

在这个价位的产品中，快速的 UFS 2.2 存储系统也是不可或缺的，其运行速度明显快于竞争对手的存储解决方案。

Huawei MatePad 11.5Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Xiaomi Redmi PadAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-82%
-16%
-42%
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
1037.71
822.4
-21%
255.1
-75%
976.9
-6%
706 ?(303 - 1038, n=62)
-32%
850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
903.32
490.6
-46%
101.1
-89%
883.6
-2%
513 ?(105.3 - 903, n=62)
-43%
532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Read 4KB
297.25
204.8
-31%
68.3
-77%
250.82
-16%
188.9 ?(89.3 - 297, n=62)
-36%
167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
418.84
201.3
-52%
57.5
-86%
257.02
-39%
180.6 ?(62.6 - 419, n=62)
-57%
150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years)
-64%

游戏 - 不可能超过 60 FPS

尽管Adreno 644提供了不错的图形处理能力，但它还必须处理相当高的分辨率。我们通过GameBench 进行了更近一步的测试。.

在《PUGB Mobile》射击游戏中，高清设置下的运行帧数稳定在 40 FPS，您还可以选择细节稍多的 HDR。如果设置较低，帧率还可能更高。尽管《地铁冲浪者》等休闲游戏名义上最高支持 120 FPS，但 MatePad 11.5 将帧率限制在 60 FPS。

地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11.5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø59.8 (55-60)
Huawei MatePad 11.5; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø39.8 (34-41)
Huawei MatePad 11.5; Subway Surfers; 1.11: Ø60 (60-60)

排放 - 华为平板电脑的四个扬声器

温度

华为 MatePad 11.5 的表面温度始终保持在一定范围内，即使在负载情况下，我们也仅在某些位置测得超过 40 °C (104 °F)的温度。

平板电脑的散热始终能够很好地补偿 SoC 的发热，在任何时候都不会出现值得一提的性能损失。

Max. Load
 41 °C41.2 °C32.8 °C 
 34.6 °C35.5 °C34.6 °C 
 31.6 °C31.6 °C31.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 35 °C
32.6 °C37.7 °C39 °C
32.1 °C34.7 °C35.5 °C
30.4 °C32 °C33.4 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.44-7.47)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.5 (4.94min - 4.96max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
99.2 (1.091min - 1.101max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
99.1 (2.05min - 2.07max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
97.9 (2.03min - 2.07max) % -2%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
99.7 (7.44min - 7.47max) % 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.7 (18.8min - 18.9max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
99.6 (4.25min - 4.27max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
99 (7.39min - 7.47max) % -1%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

华为 MatePad 11.5 的四个扬声器能够发出相当响亮的声音，在这个价位的产品中音效不错。

华为为这款平板电脑配备了自家的 Histen 8.1 优化算法，可以改善耳机的音效。您可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙无线连接耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203737.12527.629.23128.920.34021.328.45028.538.36323.124.68020.432.41002136.512516.845.116017.75620016.258.52501761.531514.46540014.969.250013.974.163014.77580014.776.3100014.978.2125014.580160014.279.4200014.679.5250014.477.2315015.673.6400014.267.4500017.264.163001570.5800014.274.31000014.671.71250017.657.11600017.956.7SPL27.288.1N0.973.9median 14.9median 71.7Delta1.58.339.242.334.437.930.825.933.432.93435.729.82928.920.119.228.421.336.418.24413.850.41457.813.359.11158.110.960.610.36515.869.416.17417.376.211.471.711.269.811.569.51267.412.969.213.573.314.172.4156515.863.316.562.517.352.426.182.90.754.7median 14median 652.57.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad 11.5Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 配备 7,700 毫安时电池的 MatePad 11.5

耗电量

在我们的测量中，MatePad 11.5 的功耗略有上升，尤其是 Tab P11。 平板电脑 P11表明，这一点也可以做得更好。

华为随平板电脑附送了一个 18 瓦的充电器。使用该充电器为平板电脑完全充电所需的时间略高于 2.5 小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.23 / 4.44 / 4.49 Watt
Load midlight 11.2 / 11.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
7500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
46%
10%
26%
Idle Minimum *
1.23
0.9
27%
1.19
3%
0.93
24%
Idle Average *
4.44
1.3
71%
4.63
-4%
4.02
9%
Idle Maximum *
4.49
1.5
67%
4.68
-4%
4.07
9%
Load Average *
11.2
5
55%
7.27
35%
5.52
51%
Load Maximum *
11.32
10.1
11%
9.17
19%
6.89
39%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1: Ø5.94 (2.11-10.7)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99: Ø5.24 (2.22-10.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.9 (5.47-6.23)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.61 (4.1-5.78)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.15 (2.11-2.29)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.063 (0.873-1.552)

电池寿命

华为 MatePad 11.5 的电池容量为 7,700 毫安时，可以实现超长的续航时间。比较电池寿命的最佳方法是在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）下进行测试。

尽管华为平板电脑的续航时间已经非常长，但联想和小米的产品表明，更长的电池续航时间也是可能的。不过，我们也不得不提到，这两款平板电脑的显示屏分辨率都较低，而红米 Pad 的刷新率也较低。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 22min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)
14h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 57min
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)
7500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
-4%
45%
Reader / Idle
1702
2096
23%
1973
16%
3640
114%
H.264
874
1002
15%
824
-6%
971
11%
WiFi v1.3
866
879
2%
679
-22%
1057
22%
Load
237
204
-14%
230
-3%
310
31%

Pros

+ 优雅的一体式机身外壳
+ 快速性能
+ 四个扬声器
+ 高分辨率 120Hz 显示屏

Cons

- 无 Google 服务
- 无全球导航卫星系统
- 无指纹传感器
- 更新时间不确定

结论：即使没有 GMS，也是一款不错的平板电脑

测试华为 MatePad 11.5。华为德国公司提供的测试机（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
测试华为 MatePad 11.5。测试机由华为德国公司提供。

通过 MatePad 11.5，华为成功地打造了一款经济实惠且极具吸引力的平板电脑。我们的主要抱怨是它无法使用谷歌服务。除此之外，华为平板电脑在生产力、娱乐、性能和电池续航时间方面都有不错的表现。

华为 MatePad 11.5 的价格不到 300 欧元（约合人民币 324 元），是一款极具吸引力的产品。

如此现代和强大的 SoC 在这个价位的产品中实属罕见，华为在存储设备方面也没有偷工减料。您还可以选配高品质键盘盖和有源输入笔。

在日常操作中，谷歌应用的缺失尤其明显地阻碍了美国公司的视频服务。但在工作效率方面问题不大，因为华为平板电脑仍可使用微软的 WPS Office 或 Office 365 等解决方案。MatePad 可使用的蓝牙编解码器也受到限制，但通过 LDAC，它仍然支持高保真编解码器。

这个价位的另一个有趣的选择是 联想平板电脑 P11在生产力方面也有不错的表现。对那些更看重纯娱乐性的用户来说，还可以仔细看看 红米平板电脑.

价格和供应情况

MatePad 11.5 可直接从各国的华为商店购买，如Huawei UK或许多亚洲国家，配件也是如此。华为全球似乎没有在美国提供该产品，但您仍然可以从国际供应商处购买，例如在 Ebay 上。

Huawei MatePad 11.5 - 09/04/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
90%
Display
85%
Games Performance
58 / 78 → 74%
Application Performance
81 / 92 → 88%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 91 → 86%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
77%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 MatePad 11.5 评测--低价高效的平板电脑
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-09- 6 (Update: 2023-09- 6)