Notebookcheck

MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/29/2019
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI

献给那些需要性能的创作者们。 MSI P65 Creator主要面向的是需要具有高性能硬件和功能的笔记本电脑的内容创作者。但是由于附带的RTX显卡,游戏玩家对这款设备也会感到同样满意——特别是因为它的设计比大多数游戏设备更低调。在我们的评测中了解MSI P65 9SF的其他信息。

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 (P65 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9880H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 300 MHz, Memory: 405 MHz, TU106M, GeForce 430.64, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4双通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 283 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Storage
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
, 880 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1个麦克风,1个耳机接口, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 357 x 247
Battery
82 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: 2, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Creator Center, MSI Driver & App Helper, Photo Director 8, Power Director, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.9 kg, Power Supply: 908 g
Price
3200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657

Size Comparison

386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 247 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼98% +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=133)
495 MBit/s ∼71% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
490 (min: 376, max: 596) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
650 (min: 629, max: 713) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=132)
473 MBit/s ∼69% -27%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø489 (376-596)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø650 (629-713)
444
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO41EB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 505 cd/m² Average: 461.9 cd/m² Minimum: 0.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 890:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
65%
79%
62%
62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51 (24, 27)
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
67%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
86%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
65%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
68%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
63%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
72%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
59%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
5%
2%
12%
Brightness middle
445
314.7
-29%
286
-36%
263
-41%
250
-44%
Brightness
462
312
-32%
275
-40%
264
-43%
235
-49%
Brightness Distribution
83
90
8%
90
8%
89
7%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.5
0.38
24%
0.37
26%
0.17
66%
0.29
42%
Contrast
890
828
-7%
773
-13%
1547
74%
862
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.75
2.56
46%
2.19
54%
4.45
6%
1.46
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.79
4.89
37%
4.4
44%
8.33
-7%
2.47
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.49
3.4
24%
2.2
51%
4.77
-6%
1.27
72%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.52 87%
2.4 92%
CCT
7374 88%
6435 101%
6405 101%
7767 84%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
60.7
-30%
59
-32%
60
-31%
60
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
94.6
-5%
91
-9%
93
-7%
93
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.71
2.27
1.93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 14%
42% / 18%
32% / 12%
37% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9451 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel Core i7-9700K: Ø1449 (1441.6-1465.07)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (183 - 197, n=5)
191 Points ∼94% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼86% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼82% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 196, n=359)
127 Points ∼63% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1401 - 1721, n=5)
1573 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼75% -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼73% -25%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼64% -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=375)
480 Points ∼31% -69%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1545 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9904 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
7161 Points ∼72% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼70% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼68% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=90)
3663 Points ∼37% -49%
Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼89% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼88% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼85% +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=91)
6089 Points ∼71% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5986 Points ∼70% 0%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10356 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼89% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
8961 Points ∼87% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼83% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 9360, n=91)
7374 Points ∼71% -18%
Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼82% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼79% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼78% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5211 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5358, n=91)
3889 Points ∼57% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points ∼100% +40%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼90% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼90% +25%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
4482 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=273)
4285 Points ∼68% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points ∼100% +56%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼79% +24%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼76% +18%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
3505 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4693, n=294)
3375 Points ∼62% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3505 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4482 points
Help
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Average 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-24%
-17%
-31%
-7%
Write 4K
105.6
93.88
-11%
97.04
-8%
129.9
23%
97.13
-8%
96 (86.3 - 106, n=2)
-9%
Read 4K
46.32
40.56
-12%
49.58
7%
47.15
2%
53.66
16%
42.9 (39.5 - 46.3, n=2)
-7%
Write Seq
2910
1468
-50%
1838
-37%
1840
-37%
1526
-48%
2886 (2862 - 2910, n=2)
-1%
Read Seq
2820
1540
-45%
2421
-14%
1775
-37%
2020
-28%
2858 (2820 - 2896, n=2)
1%
Write 4K Q32T1
545
293.5
-46%
326.9
-40%
294.5
-46%
285.6
-48%
425 (305 - 545, n=2)
-22%
Read 4K Q32T1
632.2
346
-45%
372.9
-41%
373.6
-41%
321.8
-49%
491 (350 - 632, n=2)
-22%
Write Seq Q32T1
3349
1941
-42%
1894
-43%
3295
-2%
1533
-54%
3395 (3349 - 3440, n=2)
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3333
3266
-2%
2828
-15%
3535
6%
2351
-29%
3435 (3333 - 3537, n=2)
3%
AS SSD
-4%
-24%
19%
-34%
-3%
Copy Game MB/s
1200.14
1042.83
936.25
Copy Program MB/s
525.53
452.13
362.56
Copy ISO MB/s
1974.98
2030.84
1863.91
Score Total
4411
4079
-8%
2896
-34%
5529
25%
2722
-38%
4267 (4123 - 4411, n=2)
-3%
Score Write
1762
2010
14%
1528
-13%
2590
47%
957
-46%
1660 (1558 - 1762, n=2)
-6%
Score Read
1759
1362
-23%
923
-48%
1953
11%
1180
-33%
1734 (1708 - 1759, n=2)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.033
11%
0.04
-8%
0.028
24%
0.034
8%
0.038 (0.037 - 0.039, n=2)
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.047
4%
0.08
-63%
0.031
37%
0.114
-133%
0.052 (0.049 - 0.055, n=2)
-6%
4K-64 Write
1401.42
1717.43
23%
1253
-11%
2190.3
56%
702.74
-50%
1299 (1197 - 1401, n=2)
-7%
4K-64 Read
1428.27
1125.76
-21%
623.93
-56%
1650.96
16%
913.55
-36%
1397 (1366 - 1428, n=2)
-2%
4K Write
100.19
110.72
11%
103.6
3%
134.74
34%
107.12
7%
97.3 (94.4 - 100, n=2)
-3%
4K Read
45.15
52.31
16%
48.32
7%
27.86
-38%
55.04
22%
43 (40.9 - 45.2, n=2)
-5%
Seq Write
2603.96
1822.26
-30%
1711.53
-34%
2650.29
2%
1471.06
-44%
2636 (2604 - 2668, n=2)
1%
Seq Read
2859.65
1839.67
-36%
2505.83
-12%
2738.85
-4%
2112.83
-26%
2932 (2860 - 3005, n=2)
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -15%
-24% / -24%
1% / 4%
-33% / -32%
-5% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 2646 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2859 MB/s
512K Read: 1792 MB/s
512K Write: 2635 MB/s
4K Read: 63.04 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 564.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
26975 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼90% +16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼84% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22089 Points ∼82% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 23819, n=14)
21516 Points ∼80% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points ∼77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=629)
2935 Points ∼11% -86%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
20759 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼92% +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼87% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
17598 Points ∼85% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 18443, n=15)
16803 Points ∼81% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=403)
2834 Points ∼14% -82%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
134326 Points ∼100% +104%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼81% +66%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼79% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 112480, n=13)
85155 Points ∼63% +29%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
73366 Points ∼55% +11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
65859 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=406)
16600 Points ∼12% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
19440 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36379 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14946 points
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.84 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 (min: 60) fps ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=12)
64.3 fps ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=93)
19.2 fps ∼24% -76%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
130.1 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
130 (min: 108) fps ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
128.4 fps ∼99% +10%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
116.53 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 130, n=10)
114 fps ∼88% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
86.5 fps ∼66% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=103)
28.9 fps ∼22% -75%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
223.1 fps ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
208.9 fps ∼94% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
205.84 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (145 - 209, n=9)
190 fps ∼85% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
144.9 fps ∼65% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=102)
43.4 fps ∼19% -79%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
331.2 fps ∼100% +12%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
295.68 fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (178 - 306, n=9)
256 fps ∼77% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
252.5 fps ∼76% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
177.7 fps ∼54% -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=106)
62.9 fps ∼19% -79%
Thief
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (99 - 103, n=2)
101 fps ∼100% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
99 fps ∼98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.2 - 99, n=86)
18.6 fps ∼18% -81%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
129 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
128.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.8 - 129, n=102)
29.1 fps ∼23% -77%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
132 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.6 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.3 - 132, n=93)
29.4 fps ∼22% -78%
1024x768 Very Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
135 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 135, n=90)
36.2 fps ∼27% -73%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
187.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
152.5 fps ∼81% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (116 - 211, n=12)
150 fps ∼80% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
148.78 fps ∼79%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
127.7 fps ∼68% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.62 - 149, n=216)
28.1 fps ∼15% -81%
1366x768 High Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
320.9 fps ∼100% +16%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
277.17 fps ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
246.1 fps ∼77% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (203 - 277, n=11)
243 fps ∼76% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
202.6 fps ∼63% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.3 - 277, n=251)
62.9 fps ∼20% -77%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
346 fps ∼100% +19%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
291.81 fps ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
260.1 fps ∼75% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (218 - 292, n=11)
260 fps ∼75% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
217.9 fps ∼63% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (43.7 - 292, n=241)
70.2 fps ∼20% -76%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
400.7 fps ∼100% +8%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
369.72 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (234 - 370, n=11)
298 fps ∼74% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
290.8 fps ∼73% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
233.9 fps ∼58% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.5 - 370, n=235)
108 fps ∼27% -71%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
117.4 (min: 102.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 117, n=2)
112 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.9 - 117, n=33)
54 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
122.9 (min: 108.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (111 - 123, n=2)
117 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16 - 123, n=34)
53.3 fps ∼43% -57%
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.4 (min: 115.6) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (117 - 131, n=2)
124 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.3 - 134, n=34)
75.4 fps ∼57% -43%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
142.2 (min: 126.5) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (127 - 142, n=2)
134 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.2 - 150, n=38)
86.3 fps ∼61% -39%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-83)
low med. high ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 369.72291.81277.17148.78fps
Thief (2014) 134.8131.6128.799fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 295.68205.84116.5380.8442.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 142.2131.4122.9117.4fps

Noise Level

Idle
32.8 / 32.8 / 33.6 dB(A)
Load
40.9 / 42.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.533.432.629.130.52531.830.328.729.731.83129.931.332.829.729.94028.428.830.225.928.45027.327.929.725.627.3632728.529.424.1278027.226.727.622.927.210026.226.525.323.526.212526.126.325.623.426.116026.626.325.723.226.620025.52623.922.325.525024.526.323.52224.531526.43021.92126.440025.928.521.720.825.95002527.921.519.92563024.629.320.920.424.680024.527.220.12024.5100027.330.520.819.427.3125027.53020.618.727.5160028.530.320.31828.5200029.631.820.517.829.6250030.832.520.517.430.8315032.433.820.91732.4400030.532.120.616.830.5500029.630.920.916.729.6630026.928.820.516.426.9800024.726.520.316.224.71000024.125.320.216.224.11250021.422.22016.121.41600019.720.319.91619.7SPL40.942.732.830.240.9N3.33.91.71.23.3median 26.2median 28.5median 20.8median 18.7median 26.2Delta1.521.52.21.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Max. Load
 45.7 °C49.5 °C46.8 °C 
 40.3 °C49.7 °C47.8 °C 
 31.3 °C31.3 °C34.9 °C 
Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
54.3 °C60.4 °C43 °C
44.4 °C47.1 °C40.6 °C
36.3 °C37.1 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 60.4 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203129.1312530.629.730.63130.729.730.74028.925.928.95027.725.627.76326.424.126.48027.622.927.610032.223.532.212534.923.434.916035.523.235.520034.622.334.625043.32243.331551.82151.840056.820.856.850057.319.957.363062.320.462.380071.52071.5100073.519.473.5125072.518.772.5160073.41873.4200077.417.877.4250069.417.469.4315072.91772.9400070.116.870.1500067.716.767.763006516.465800064.716.264.71000055.916.255.9125005216.1521600048.81648.8SPL83.530.283.5N49.71.249.7median 62.3median 18.7median 62.3Delta12.12.212.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 1.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.4 / 17.4 / 19.6 Watt
Load midlight 103 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
10%
-61%
-118%
-10%
-17%
18%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
10.4
-11%
24
-155%
35
-272%
16
-70%
15.8 (9.4 - 23.5, n=12)
-68%
11.6 (2.1 - 101, n=927)
-23%
Idle Average *
17.4
14.6
16%
27
-55%
39
-124%
18
-3%
19.6 (12.3 - 28, n=12)
-13%
16.1 (4.2 - 122, n=927)
7%
Idle Maximum *
19.6
16.3
17%
33
-68%
47
-140%
23
-17%
24.4 (16.3 - 33, n=12)
-24%
19.6 (4.7 - 181, n=927)
-0%
Load Average *
103
88.5
14%
129
-25%
117
-14%
88
15%
94.8 (83.4 - 107, n=12)
8%
59.8 (18.5 - 164, n=906)
42%
Load Maximum *
216
182.4
16%
216
-0%
299
-38%
167
23%
189 (120 - 229, n=12)
12%
77.9 (20.1 - 329, n=911)
64%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155.4
176
196
120

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 37min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 05min
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
20%
-27%
-31%
57%
0%
Reader / Idle
577
682
18%
353
-39%
194
-66%
549
-5%
405 (73 - 2085, n=886)
-30%
WiFi v1.3
357
387
8%
220
-38%
157
-56%
382
7%
356 (96 - 942, n=243)
0%
Load
65
88
35%
62
-5%
83
28%
174
168%
85.3 (32 - 238, n=886)
31%
H.264
154
364
352 (114 - 915, n=105)

Pros

+ 屏幕色域广
+ 窄边框
+ 轻量化
+ 紧凑的设计
+ 性能强
+ 雷电3
+ RAID固态

Cons

- RTX 2070 Max-Q TDP低
- 没有什么可维护性
- 没有读卡器

Verdict - compact multimedia notebook with a lot of power

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.

我们的评测显示,MSI P65 Creator 9SF是一款结构紧凑的高性能笔电。它的外观完全适合商务环境,做工精良。雷电3端口可确保用户能够继续满足未来的任何端口需求。

MSI P65 Creator 9SF以其迷人的设计和卓越的性能而引人注目。然而,制造商可以选择具有更高TDP的RTX 2070。

系统性能优秀,可以轻松跟上大多数竞争对手。然而,其他制造商却能设法从GPU中获得更多,P65 Creator则仅配备了RTX 2070 Max-Q的低TDP版本。与之前的型号一样,维护选项基本上不存在。我们的测试单元还继续采用集成在触摸板中的指纹识别器。后者比以前宽得多,因此为手势导航提供了更多空间。

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 - 06/03/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
0 / 81 → 
Weight
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Battery
88%
Display
89%
Games Performance
99 / 85 → 100%
Application Performance
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperature
84%
Noise
81 / 95 → 85%
Audio
74%
Average
83%
89%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测
Mike Wobker, 2019-07-29 (Update: 2019-07-29)