Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar微星P65 Creator 8RF (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, 512 GB SSD, 144 Hz)笔记本电脑评测
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator (P65 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1266 MHz, Memory: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, Nvidia 398.35, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, 1x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, 单通道, 共两个插槽, 最大32 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Storage
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB
, 512 GB SSD (M.2 PCIe Gen3 NVMe)
Weight
1.899 kg, Power Supply: 557 g
Price
16999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (484-680)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 249 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 235.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 238 cd/m²
Contrast: 1068:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.32 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE B156ZAN03.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | -0% | 0% | 2% | 31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.1 | 85.9 32% | 63.6 -2% | 66.4 2% | 66.2 2% | 86.3 33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.1 | 100 10% | 93.8 3% | 90.2 -1% | 92.1 1% | 100 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 99.1 50% | 64.9 -2% | 66 0% | 67.2 2% | 99.4 51% |
| Response Times | -141% | -4% | 38% | -13% | -238% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 44 ? -175% | 16.8 ? -5% | 7.2 ? 55% | 17.6 ? -10% | 61.6 ? -285% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 22.8 ? -107% | 11.2 ? -2% | 8.8 ? 20% | 12.8 ? -16% | 32 ? -191% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -2% | 18% | 3% | 13% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 235 | 357.6 52% | 313 33% | 271 15% | 254 8% | 396 69% |
| Brightness | 235 | 350 49% | 300 28% | 261 11% | 262 11% | 380 62% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 78 -8% | 86 1% | 89 5% | 90 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.35 -59% | 0.33 -50% | 0.32 -45% | 0.22 -0% | 0.28 -27% |
| Contrast | 1068 | 1022 -4% | 948 -11% | 847 -21% | 1155 8% | 1414 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.82 | 4.12 -46% | 1.29 54% | 2.61 7% | 2.37 16% | 4 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.82 | 9.91 -106% | 2.04 58% | 4.93 -2% | 4.71 2% | 7.6 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.88 | 4.23 13% | 2.33 52% | 1.84 62% | 0.9 82% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 1.8 22% | 0.69 70% | 1.97 15% | 1.58 32% | 6.1 -163% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.17 101% | 2.43 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6310 103% | 6613 98% | 6550 99% | 6398 102% | 6785 96% | 7786 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 87.5 48% | 60 2% | 59 0% | 60 2% | 88.5 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 100 9% | 94 2% | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 100 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-13% | 5% /
11% | 14% /
7% | 1% /
8% | -68% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø993 (983.33-1046.24)
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1039 (1027.64-1112.59)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1218 (1194.56-1224.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1065 (1052.44-1126.79)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1110 (1041.91-1133.72)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | wPrime 2.10 | Blender
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (7.56 - 9.55, n=5) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (396 - 486, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=93, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4446 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5264 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5651 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4910 points | |
Help | ||
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 33% | 21% | 42% | 35% | 71% | |
| Write 4K | 89.2 | 125 40% | 94.4 6% | 97.9 10% | 95.3 7% | 123.7 39% |
| Read 4K | 34.36 | 44.68 30% | 37.65 10% | 41.23 20% | 40.13 17% | 44.07 28% |
| Write Seq | 949 | 1059 12% | 1335 41% | 1852 95% | 1883 98% | 2215 133% |
| Read Seq | 899 | 772 -14% | 1404 56% | 1761 96% | 1322 47% | 2242 149% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 371.4 | 507 37% | 268.6 -28% | 297.7 -20% | 309.9 -17% | 313.9 -15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 399 | 614 54% | 332.8 -17% | 344.2 -14% | 353.7 -11% | 359.8 -10% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1035 | 1763 70% | 1375 33% | 1864 80% | 1919 85% | 2404 132% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1603 | 2171 35% | 2627 64% | 2738 71% | 2466 54% | 3333 108% |
| AS SSD | 72% | 19% | 83% | 72% | 123% | |
| Seq Read | 850 | 2099 147% | 2213 160% | 1837 116% | 1266 49% | 2703 218% |
| Seq Write | 869 | 1729 99% | 1163 34% | 1730 99% | 1834 111% | 2336 169% |
| 4K Read | 36.43 | 37.78 4% | 23.36 -36% | 53.3 46% | 48.94 34% | 56.8 56% |
| 4K Write | 84.4 | 100.9 20% | 80.4 -5% | 105.7 25% | 107.2 27% | 130.9 55% |
| 4K-64 Read | 839 | 1431 71% | 847 1% | 1305 56% | 1170 39% | 1805 115% |
| 4K-64 Write | 602 | 1273 111% | 742 23% | 1704 183% | 1760 192% | 1782 196% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.104 | 0.04 62% | 0.119 -14% | 0.049 53% | 0.073 30% | 0.034 67% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.036 18% | 0.046 -5% | 0.035 20% | 0.035 20% | 0.028 36% |
| Score Read | 960 | 1679 75% | 1092 14% | 1542 61% | 1346 40% | 2132 122% |
| Score Write | 773 | 1547 100% | 939 21% | 1983 157% | 2051 165% | 2147 178% |
| Score Total | 2233 | 4065 82% | 2536 14% | 4318 93% | 4122 85% | 5355 140% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
55% | 20% /
20% | 63% /
66% | 54% /
56% | 97% /
101% |
* ... smaller is better
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Sequential Read:
858 MB/s
Sequential Write:
879 MB/s
512K Read:
604 MB/s
512K Write:
796 MB/s
4K Read:
34.15 MB/s
4K Write:
85.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
354.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
321.9 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33475 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 44090 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14492 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 80916 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29275 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12573 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6589 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4763 points | |
Help | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (46 - 55.3, n=19) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| MSI WS63 7RF-290US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (32 - 153, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (58 - 61, n=3) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| F1 2018 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (70 - 76, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Forza Horizon 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (78 - 80, n=2) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q; FPS: Ø23.7 (22-27)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q: Ø49.9 (45-53)
MSI WS63 7RF-290US Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA Quadro P3000: Ø31.3 (29-35)
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 249.1 | 222.1 | 204.7 | 118 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 218.5 | 156.7 | 93.2 | 51.5 | 27.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 131.1 | 126.7 | 85.7 | 77.1 | 32.1 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 123.2 | 105.5 | 91.5 | 90.7 | 39.1 |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 70 | 64 | 62 | 53 | 26 |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 103 | 81 | 77 | 74 | 27 |
| F1 2018 (2018) | 163 | 130 | 100 | 76 | 59 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 91 | 65 | 62 | 58 | 20 |
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 127 | 101 | 95 | 78 | 43 |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 64 | 62 | 52 | 39 | 21 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 32.1 / 32.1 / 32.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39 / 40.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI WS63 7RF-290US Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 6% | -9% | -13% | -2% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 28 9% | 28.8 6% | 29 6% | 29 6% | 30 2% | 28.1 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.1 | 28.6 11% | 28.8 10% | 30 7% | 32 -0% | 30 7% | 28.1 12% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 29.9 7% | 28.8 10% | 31 3% | 33 -3% | 31 3% | 28.1 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.4 | 30.5 6% | 31.3 3% | 35 -8% | 40 -23% | 34 -5% | 32 1% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 42.5 -9% | 36.4 7% | 49 -26% | 49 -26% | 43 -10% | 38 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 44.8 -11% | 39.2 2% | 54 -34% | 53 -32% | 44 -9% | 47.2 -17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.8 | 36.4 | 51 | 51 | 42 | 35.8 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.6 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.9 °C / -23.3 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.6 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.9 °C / -23.3 F).
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI WS63 7RF-290US Quadro P3000, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 7% | -6% | -17% | 3% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.6 | 42.4 9% | 45.4 3% | 53 -14% | 55 -18% | 49 -5% | 46.4 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 56.6 | 50.8 10% | 53.4 6% | 65 -15% | 55 3% | 63 -11% | 62 -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.8 | 33 -15% | 26.3 9% | 26 10% | 36 -25% | 24 17% | 28.2 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 35.2 -24% | 26.2 8% | 30 -5% | 36 -26% | 25 12% | 28.8 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 1.35 / 1.5 Watt |
| Idle | 7.4 / 11.7 / 16.8 Watt |
| Load |
94 / 177 Watt |
   
| |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI WS63 7RF-290US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P3000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | 2% | -34% | -124% | -3% | -6% | -23% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 11.7 -58% | 7.6 -3% | 14 -89% | 29 -292% | 7 5% | 11 -49% | 11.4 ? -54% | 7.29 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 11.7 | 18.5 -58% | 14.8 -26% | 18 -54% | 32 -174% | 11 6% | 14.2 -21% | 15.7 ? -34% | 11.7 ? -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.8 | 22.8 -36% | 17.6 -5% | 22 -31% | 38 -126% | 20 -19% | 14.6 13% | 20.7 ? -23% | 14.5 ? 14% |
| Load Average * | 94 | 97.5 -4% | 86 9% | 91 3% | 100 -6% | 98 -4% | 77.7 17% | 98.1 ? -4% | 77.7 ? 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 177 | 111.1 37% | 118.9 33% | 173 2% | 217 -23% | 182 -3% | 161.7 9% | 173.8 ? 2% | 120.2 ? 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 102.9 | 85 | 142 | 170 | 132 | 89.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 23% | 54% | -50% | -2% | 64% | |
| Reader / Idle | 447 | 842 88% | 691 55% | 762 70% | 176 -61% | 507 13% | 933 ? 109% |
| H.264 | 353 | 371 5% | 504 43% | 150 -58% | 356 1% | 698 ? 98% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 375 -12% | 384 -10% | 513 20% | 146 -66% | 362 -15% | 569 ? 33% |
| Load | 85 | 76 -11% | 119 40% | 156 84% | 71 -16% | 81 -5% | 97.6 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 63 | 81.8 ? |
Pros
+ 144赫兹屏幕色彩精确且没有PWM调光现象
+ 比较安静
+ 窄边框
+ 指纹识别器
+ 可切换显卡
+ 重量轻
+ 尺寸小
+ 工具实用
+ 电源适配器很小巧
+ 外观设计很高端
+ 包装很上档次（木盒包装）
+ 赠送保护套
+ 高性能
+ 雷电3
+ NVMe的SSD
Cons
- 做工和坚固程度可以做得更好
- CPU睿频可以更高
- 键盘布局需要适应
- 键盘在低光环境下难以阅读
- 可维护性低
- 没有读卡器
- 指纹识别器集成在触摸板中
- 没有第二个储存选项
顾名思义，MSI的P65 8RF Creator是基于GS65 8RF而来的。但是，它的目标客户群体是使用Adobe Photoshop或Adobe Premiere等软件的创作者。限量版不仅提供白色外壳，还有着强大的GPU和包括保护套的高品质包装盒。此外，在微星官网注册产品后，可享受36个月的免费保修延期。
问题是，这个设备是为谁打造的？如果您正在寻找一款时尚且很稀有的设备，P65 8RF可能很适合你。P65外观非常好看，而且没有牺牲任何游戏性能，它在外观上减少了电竞元素从而使得外观非常稳重，这才是P65 8RF真正的魅力所在。
微星P65就是一台“扮猪吃老虎”的笔记本电脑，在白天，它是一台时尚的商务笔记本。在晚上，它可以拿来运行最高特效的1080p游戏。
外壳是在便携性和刚性之间做出的妥协。材料非常优质，但我们仍然希望设计的更加坚固。显示器把双刃剑。一方面，它提供144 Hz刷新率和快速的响应时间。另一方面，它亮度太低，几乎无法在室外使用。键盘也不是最好的，而且非常难以阅读，不寻常的布局意味着习惯需要更长的时间。
另一方面，性能毫无疑问是你在这种轻薄设备中想象不到的。英特尔的酷睿i7-8750H表现不错，尽管其性能受到一定程度的负载影响，但考虑到轻薄的设计，Nvidia的GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q提供了令人难以置信的性能。
售价达到了16999元，与GS65 8RF相当，但它提供了一些附加功能，如指纹识别器或延长保修。如果你不喜欢典型的黑色设计和RGB元素，你可以考虑P65。
如果您决定购买P65 Creator，微星将赠送一个价值超过300美元的软件包，以便开始您的创作（有效期至2018年12月31日）。
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
-
11/10/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
