富士通 LifeBook U757 (7200U, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Brand: Fujitsu

为了鼠标用户，第二波。 在刚刚测试了Lifebook U747之后，U757就已经进入了我们的测试实验室。请阅读我们的深入评测报告，来了解U757是否值得购买。

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 03/27/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu LifeBook U757 (LifeBook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM, 其中之一已占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB

, 2280 M.2 固态硬盘, 197 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳麦接口, Card Reader: 3-in-1 SD card reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, Sierra EM7305, LTE

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.2 x 378 x 256

Battery

50 Wh Lithium-Polymer, removeable

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD webcam

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6 排巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Recovery-DVD, Cyberlink YouCam 6, Lifebook Application Panel, McAfee LiveSafe, Microsoft Office (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.717 kg, Power Supply: 368 g

Price

1260 Euro

Links

Fujitsu homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Acer TravelMate P658-M-59J7 Graphics Dock DIN A4 ❌

Left: Power-in, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-C (with DisplayPort & power-in), USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard (absent in review sample)

Right: Combo audio jack, UBS 3.0 Type-A, DisplayPort, HDMI, Ethernet, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570	155 MB/s +109%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	74 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	73.6 MB/s -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	73.2 MB/s -1%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B	68.1 MB/s -8%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	89.5 MB/s +8%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	85.4 MB/s +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	82.6 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	561 MBit/s +7%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	523 MBit/s 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	522 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	660 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	639 MBit/s -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	588 MBit/s -11%


286 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	309 cd/m²
275 cd/m²	313 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
264 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	309 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP156WF6-SPP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 313 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 294 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 310 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.60	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B LG Philips LGD04D5 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-27%	-7%	-33%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	65.8	44.08 -33%	56.8 -14%	40.48 -38%	66.6 1%
sRGB Coverage	84.8	65.6 -23%	83.7 -1%	60.9 -28%	85.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62	45.66 -26%	58.7 -5%	41.82 -33%	62.8 1%
Response Times		3%	6%	-17%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(17.2, 18.8)	41.6 ?(22, 19.6) -16%	47.2 ?(26.8, 20.4) -31%	47 ?(22, 25) -31%	38 ?(14, 24) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8)	20.8 ?(6.8, 14) 21%	15.2 ?(10, 5.2) 42%	27 ?(10, 17) -2%	25 ?(6, 19) 5%
PWM Frequency		26040 ?(40)	199.2 ?(50)
Screen		-6%	-69%	-61%	-16%
Brightness middle	313	262 -16%	338 8%	228 -27%	308 -2%
Brightness	294	245 -17%	341 16%	236 -20%	319 9%
Brightness Distribution	84	89 6%	90 7%	90 7%	71 -15%
Black Level *	0.27	0.24 11%	0.81 -200%	0.56 -107%	0.61 -126%
Contrast	1159	1092 -6%	417 -64%	407 -65%	505 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	4.5 -0%	10.9 -142%	10.02 -123%	4.51 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.5	10.5 -0%	18.7 -78%	15.93 -52%	10.19 3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4	3.5 12%	13.3 -233%	10.66 -167%	2.91 27%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.48 ^89%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6387 ^102%	6524 ^100%	16030 ^41%	11800 ^55%	6740 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.3	42.04 -24%	53.8 -3%	39 -29%	56 1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.74	65.4 -23%	83.4 -2%	61 -28%	86 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-10% / -9%	-23% / -47%	-37% / -50%	-5% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.6 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.2 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U	124 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel Core i5-6200U	78 Points -39%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U	310 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel Core i5-6200U	219 Points -34%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3542 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3523 Points +6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3475 Points +5%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	3320 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP	3282 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3320 points
Help

	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		98%	34%	-26%	-20%
Read Seq	509	1318 159%	1245 145%	474.7 -7%	479.1 -6%
Write Seq	488.4	1166 139%	298.6 -39%	155 -68%	333.1 -32%
Read 512	414.3	933 125%	673 62%	393.6 -5%	418 1%
Write 512	321.7	860 167%	298.8 -7%	119.7 -63%	320.5 0%
Read 4k	36.43	56.6 55%	41.79 15%	34 -7%	25.66 -30%
Write 4k	88.4	130.6 48%	138.4 57%	96.6 9%	64.7 -27%
Read 4k QD32	402.8	510 27%	495 23%	383.3 -5%	226.2 -44%
Write 4k QD32	256.7	426.4 66%	297.5 16%	100.2 -61%	211.4 -18%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP

Sequential Read: 509 MB/s

Sequential Write: 488.4 MB/s

512K Read: 414.3 MB/s

512K Write: 321.7 MB/s

4K Read: 36.43 MB/s

4K Write: 88.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 402.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 256.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1431 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1417 Points +8%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1347 Points +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1309 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1296 Points -1%

3DMark 11 Performance		1436 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	41.62	24.13	19.76

Noise Level

Idle		28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A)
Load		33.3 / 34 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


37.8 °C	42 °C	25.1 °C
37.6 °C	33.5 °C	23.1 °C
23.3 °C	23.2 °C	22.1 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


25.4 °C	38.8 °C	36.4 °C
24.1 °C	30.2 °C	33.3 °C
22.3 °C	23.4 °C	23.5 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 28.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.1 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.3 °C / 73.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+4.4 °C / 8 F).

Fujitsu LifeBook U757 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.32 Watt
Idle	3.96 / 7.74 / 8.64 Watt
Load	28.8 / 32 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Power Consumption		-7%	6%	-1%	-36%
Idle Minimum *	3.96	3.6 9%	3.58 10%	4.5 -14%	6.6 -67%
Idle Average *	7.74	7.7 1%	5.97 23%	7.6 2%	10.4 -34%
Idle Maximum *	8.64	8.2 5%	6.81 21%	8.7 -1%	12.7 -47%
Load Average *	28.8	30.8 -7%	29.4 -2%	28.5 1%	36 -25%
Load Maximum *	32	46.1 -44%	39.7 -24%	29.2 9%	35 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh	632 min +44%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh	530 min +20%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh	512 min +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	454 min +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	440 min

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		7h 20min

Pros

+ 良好的IPS面板

+ 稳固且制作精灵的外壳

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 易拆卸的键盘

+ 总是冰凉而安静

+ 良好的界面多样性

Cons

- 触摸板差

- 网络摄像头差

- 扬声器太小声

- 固态硬盘干扰噪声

- 测试机没有TouchStick

- 保修期比竞争对手短（24个月）

- 浪费了大机身的内部空间

In review: Fujitsu Lifebook U757. Review sample courtesy of Fujitsu Germany.

我们所评测的这两个新的Lifebook U笔记本非常相似。U757在某种程度上可以说是U747 的一个尺寸更大的版本，因此它继承了原本型号的优缺点：良好的屏幕，舒适的键盘，优秀的外壳。触摸板变化很大。U757的风扇噪音对比尺寸较小的型号有所优化，但同时也可能会产生来自固态硬盘的噪声。

与较小型号相比，U757最大的缺点在于，富士通并没有真正利用这个机会让15英寸机型独特化，没有有效地利用更大尺寸带来的优势。数字键盘，一个可选的2.5英寸机械硬盘/固态硬盘插槽，另外一个HDMI接口和一个可选的（目前没有安装在任何德国机型上）的UHD屏幕：这些是U757与U747的差别。其实，在其他方面也可以做出改变：例如，对于15英寸商用笔记本电脑来说，两个USB Type-A接口相当薄弱，50瓦时的电池相对较小（与较小型号相同），鉴于拥有额外的空间，一个可以安装到U757中的专用显卡也应该被配备。然而，这也没有。

U757与其较小的原有机型没有做够的差异性。所以如果要在富士通的U系列中Lifebook中做选择时，我们推荐较小型号。其尺寸在日常使用中更加让人愉快。

因此，U757可以说是U747的加大版本。如果觉得LifeBook U系列的硬件条件有吸引力，买家应该选择U747. 更大的机型只的优势在于当需要数字小键盘和更大的屏幕。可选的超高清机型目前无法在德国获取。这个类别下，有一些设备也很有趣;特别是 ThinkPad T570 ，并且可能是一个强劲的对手。惠普Elitebook 850 G4 也是一个很好的竞争对手。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Fujitsu LifeBook U757 - 2017-03-20 03/20/2017 v6^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

79%

Connectivity

64 / 80 → 80%

Weight

66 / 20-67 → 99%

Battery

90%

Display

87%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 80%

Application Performance

84 / 92 → 92%

Temperature

94%

Noise

93%

Audio

43%

Camera

44 / 85 → 51%

Average

74%

86%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 富士通 LifeBook U757 (7200U, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-03-27 (Update: 2017-04- 2)