Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 EliteBook 850 G4 (酷睿 i5, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

有典型缺点的机器。 惠普更新了EliteBooks,以获取商业用户和大型企业采购经理的芳心。我们的评测将揭示EliteBook 850 G4是否能成功,还是惠普再次偷工减料,就像他们对该机前代所做的那样。
Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET (EliteBook 850 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2133, 1 of 2 slots in use, 32 GB max.
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO35ED, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, 2280 PCIe NVMe SSD
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米 耳机接口 (输入/输出), Card Reader: 3合1 SD 卡读卡器, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.8 x 383.6 x 257.7
Battery
51 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6 排巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Discover HP Tpuchpoint Manager, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Documentation, HP Sure Connect, HP Velocity, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office 365 Trial, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.883 kg, Power Supply: 324 g
Price
1437 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lid side view
Lid side view
Peek at the interior
Maximum opening angle
Front view (open)
Front view (closed)
Modifier keys: Wi-Fi and speaker mute
Touchpad made of glass
TrackPoint with two buttons
Bottom cover

Size comparison

383.6 mm 257.7 mm 20.8 mm 1.9 kg381 mm 254.5 mm 22.4 mm 2.1 kg377 mm 256 mm 24 mm 2.1 kg378 mm 256 mm 19.2 mm 1.7 kg365.8 mm 252.8 mm 20.2 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right side: USB Type-C Gen1, DisplayPort, SD-card slot, 3.5-mm audio jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, Ethernet, DockingPort, SIM-card slot, power adapter
Right side: USB Type-C Gen1, DisplayPort, SD-card slot, 3.5-mm audio jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, Ethernet, DockingPort, SIM-card slot, power adapter
Left side: Kensington lock, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard Reader
Left side: Kensington lock, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard Reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
 
155 MB/s +112%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
 
74 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
 
73.6 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
 
73.2 MB/s
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
 
68.1 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
 
89.5 MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
 
85.4 MB/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
 
82.6 MB/s -3%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
561 MBit/s +7%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s 0%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
660 MBit/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
588 MBit/s
342
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO35ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 364 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 417:1 (Black: 0.81 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
LG Philips LGD04D5 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.60
HP EliteBook 850 G3
AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-22%
8%
9%
-28%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
56.8
44.08
-22%
65.8
16%
66.6
17%
40.48
-29%
54.2
-5%
sRGB Coverage
83.7
65.6
-22%
84.8
1%
85.7
2%
60.9
-27%
79.3
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
58.7
45.66
-22%
62
6%
62.8
7%
41.82
-29%
56
-5%
Response Times
4316%
-25%
-23%
-39%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 ?(26.8, 20.4)
41.6 ?(22, 19.6)
12%
36 ?(17.2, 18.8)
24%
38 ?(14, 24)
19%
47 ?(22, 25)
-0%
46.4 ?(22.4, 24)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
15.2 ?(10, 5.2)
20.8 ?(6.8, 14)
-37%
26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8)
-74%
25 ?(6, 19)
-64%
27 ?(10, 17)
-78%
27.2 ?(9.2, 18)
-79%
PWM Frequency
199.2 ?(50)
26040 ?(40)
12972%
200 ?(50)
0%
Screen
31%
40%
20%
-5%
7%
Brightness middle
338
262
-22%
313
-7%
308
-9%
228
-33%
290
-14%
Brightness
341
245
-28%
294
-14%
319
-6%
236
-31%
287
-16%
Brightness Distribution
90
89
-1%
84
-7%
71
-21%
90
0%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.81
0.24
70%
0.27
67%
0.61
25%
0.56
31%
0.54
33%
Contrast
417
1092
162%
1159
178%
505
21%
407
-2%
537
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
10.9
4.5
59%
4.5
59%
4.51
59%
10.02
8%
9.7
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.7
10.5
44%
10.5
44%
10.19
46%
15.93
15%
14.39
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.3
3.5
74%
4
70%
2.91
78%
10.66
20%
10.83
19%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.32 95%
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
2.48 89%
2.91 76%
CCT
16030 41%
6524 100%
6387 102%
6740 96%
11800 55%
12761 51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
53.8
42.04
-22%
55.3
3%
56
4%
39
-28%
51.15
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83.4
65.4
-22%
84.74
2%
86
3%
61
-27%
78.96
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1442% / 825%
8% / 25%
2% / 12%
-24% / -14%
-8% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 199.2 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 199.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 199.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18090 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HWInfo
HWInfo
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
78 Points -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel Core i7-6500U
322 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel Core i5-6300U
310 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel Core i5-6200U
219 Points -34%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
38.24 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
330 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3542 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3523 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3475 Points -2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3320 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
3282 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4606 Points +6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
4467 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4330 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
4301 Points -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3542 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4330 points
Help
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
75%
-13%
-32%
-44%
Read Seq
1245
1318
6%
509
-59%
479.1
-62%
474.7
-62%
Write Seq
298.6
1166
290%
488.4
64%
333.1
12%
155
-48%
Read 512
673
933
39%
414.3
-38%
418
-38%
393.6
-42%
Write 512
298.8
860
188%
321.7
8%
320.5
7%
119.7
-60%
Read 4k
41.79
56.6
35%
36.43
-13%
25.66
-39%
34
-19%
Write 4k
138.4
130.6
-6%
88.4
-36%
64.7
-53%
96.6
-30%
Read 4k QD32
495
510
3%
402.8
-19%
226.2
-54%
383.3
-23%
Write 4k QD32
297.5
426.4
43%
256.7
-14%
211.4
-29%
100.2
-66%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Sequential Read: 1245 MB/s
Sequential Write: 298.6 MB/s
512K Read: 673 MB/s
512K Write: 298.8 MB/s
4K Read: 41.79 MB/s
4K Write: 138.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 495 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 297.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1431 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1417 Points
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1347 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1327 Points -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1309 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1296 Points -9%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7030 Points +3%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6963 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6840 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
6586 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
6303 Points -8%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
822 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
792 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
786 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
762 Points -4%
3DMark 11 Performance
1534 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5666 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
748 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.4 24.2 20.5
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 21.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 17.7

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load
31 / 33.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.533.234.32536.931.434.13137.832.933.24036.331.330.95031.328.328.8632927.626.78028.127.72710026.523.425.112526.825.327.116024.42323.620023.523.92425024.826.224.531522.622.423.240021.62122.65002019.721.16302018.722.18002019.623.9100020.319.824.512502016.923160019.714.922.5200019.614.321.5250019.714.120.3315017.513.819.7400017.314.119.2500015.514.118630015.214.115.780001514.114.91000015.214.415.11250014.614.214.81600014.614.114.4SPL312933.1N1.51.21.8median 20median 16.9median 22.1Delta3.63.9332.430.432.332.131.233.430.83231.929.631.232.728.531.630.626.32727.725.426.527.323.924.826.722.723.12421.523.423.720.922.523.52322.923.123.920.125.320.719.121.719.61821.3211721.819.717.620.221.917.822.82215.523.12214.522.319.414.42120.813.821.42014.120.218.91519.617.514.818.415.914.716.915.214.61614.914.615.714.514.614.914.414.315.132.228.1331.61.11.8median 20.7median 15.5median 21.422.52.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ETFujitsu LifeBook U757
Top (Idle)
Top (Idle)
Bottom (Idle)
Bottom (Idle)
Top (Load)
Top (Load)
Bottom (Load)
Bottom (Load)
Max. Load
 31.2 °C35.7 °C35.2 °C 
 28.7 °C34 °C37 °C 
 23.7 °C24.3 °C24.8 °C 
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 30.5 °C
41.1 °C40.1 °C31.3 °C
37.5 °C37.1 °C30.9 °C
27.8 °C28.1 °C25.1 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.8 °C / 76.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.9 °C / 5.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203432.22535.9353132.636.34034.535.95027.931.76326.931802732.610025.832.512525.537.116023.941.320024.448.625025.852.531521.860.440020.16250019.364.163018.864.180019.560.910002061.8125017.861.2160015.458200014.959.2250014.563.6315014.161.6400015.662.7500014.764630017.166.6800016.964.11000015.755.61250016.352.51600018.649.4SPL29.574.6N1.336.1median 18.6median 60.9Delta3.46.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ETApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.56 / 0.65 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.58 / 5.97 / 6.81 Watt
Load midlight 29.4 / 39.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, TN LED, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS LED, 1920x1080
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
6200U, HD Graphics 520, IPS, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
6300U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1366x768
HP EliteBook 850 G3
6500U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-14%
-9%
-51%
-10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
3.58
3.6
-1%
3.96
-11%
6.6
-84%
4.5
-26%
5
-40%
Idle Average *
5.97
7.7
-29%
7.74
-30%
10.4
-74%
7.6
-27%
7.8
-31%
Idle Maximum *
6.81
8.2
-20%
8.64
-27%
12.7
-86%
8.7
-28%
8.4
-23%
Load Average *
29.4
30.8
-5%
28.8
2%
36
-22%
28.5
3%
28.8
2%
Load Maximum *
39.7
46.1
-16%
32
19%
35
12%
29.2
26%
43
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 40min
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh
Dell Latitude 15 E5570
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G3
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh
Battery Runtime
3%
-17%
-16%
4%
-20%
Reader / Idle
1081
1167
8%
840
-22%
1231
14%
915
-15%
H.264
637
587
-8%
571
-10%
430
-32%
WiFi v1.3
530
454
-14%
440
-17%
512
-3%
632
19%
417
-21%
Load
160
201
26%
123
-23%
151
-6%
142
-11%

Pros

+ 高品质坚固的外壳
+ 几乎算是运行良好的输入设备
+ 非常冰冷和安静
+ 节能,电池续航长
+ 三年保修
+ 表现不俗

Cons

- 难以接受的TN面板,并且闪烁
- 没有雷电3接口
- 维护困难
- 比较贵
In review: HP EliteBook 850 G4. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HP EliteBook 850 G4. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

总的来说EliteBook 850 G4是难免令人沮丧。虽然惠普使用此设备配备了正确的配件,但仍然令人失望。外壳坚固而且制作精良,输入设备是不错(虽然不完美),散热出色,电池续航也非常好,考虑到电池容量。总而言之,除了雷电3的缺乏,难以维护和价格高之外,还没有太多的缺点。

不幸的是,所有这一切惠普传统上的高端商务本特质,都被劣质的TN显示屏幕所掩盖。毕竟,该机价格在稍微超过1400欧元(约合1491美元)的区间里,即使是在你以1700欧元(约1811美元)获取最高配置机,它的显示效果也是一样的。是的,屏幕是是明亮的,但除此之外,它显示了您可以从TN面板中预期的所有质量。笔记本电脑规格表中列出,在德国尚不能获得超高清IPS选项。

惠普采用了所有正确的配件......除了一个:EliteBook 850 G4的TN面板,它搞砸了原本可以非常好的印象。

但除这就是为什么尽管它的所有功能和质量都不错,我们还是不能推荐EliteBook 850 G4的原因。如果是在五年前,这是一个完全不同的情况:当时几乎所有的商业笔记本电脑配备了类似的显示器。然而,惠普似乎是唯一没有获得备忘录的人。如今,TN面板在价格相同的笔记本电脑中全部消失。其主要竞争对手在其高端业务设备中提供全高清IPS面板。 就连ThinkPad T570相当差劲的IPS面板都击败了EliteBook的劣质TN面板,更不用说其他高品质的IPS面板,例如富士通 Lifebook U757

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里


HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET - 03/25/2017 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
57 / 80 → 71%
Weight
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Battery
92%
Display
77%
Games Performance
55 / 68 → 81%
Application Performance
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperature
94%
Noise
98%
Audio
64%
Camera
27 / 85 → 32%
Average
75%
86%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook 850 G4 (酷睿 i5, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-04- 9 (Update: 2017-04-16)