KUU LeBook 12.6二合一敞篷车评论。一个更便宜的微软Surface Pro替代品
KUU LeBook 12.6是一款与Surface Pro系列相同的Windows 10可拆卸式。它的设计和功能显然受到了成功的微软平板电脑的启发，但为了保持价格的显著降低，它做了某些改变和偷工减料。这些变化之一是使用了较老的英特尔第八代酷睿U系列CPU，而不是目前市场上大多数PC上的最新11代版本。本评论将探讨用户在购买更便宜的LeBook而不是更传统的Surface Pro时可以期待的所有其他差异。
LeBook的竞争者包括其他Windows 10平板电脑或可拆卸设备，如 微软Surface, 联想ThinkPad X12，或 戴尔Latitude 12 7210 2合1所有这些产品的零售价格都较高。然而，LeBook的独特之处在于其稍大的3：2 12.6英寸显示屏，而不是通常的12.3英寸或12.5英寸屏幕。由于截至发稿时尚未广泛上市，制造商尚未最终确定LeBook的价格。
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U
Processor
Intel Core i7-8550U 4 x 1.8 - 4 GHz, 18 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Kaby Lake Refresh
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 1067 MHz, RAM: 1150 MHz, 27.20.100.8682
Memory
8 GB
, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Display
12.60 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 206 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, BOE TV126WTM-NU0, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Storage
KUU-512GB
Weight
859 g, Power Supply: 211 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 859 g | 9.5 mm | 12.60" | 2160x1440 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 14.5 mm | 12.30" | 1920x1280 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 796 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
| 89.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 850 g | 9.35 mm | 12.30" | 1920x1280 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.1 kg | 15.69 mm | 12.40" | 1536x1024 | |
| 77.1 % v6 (old) | NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500 | 1 kg | 15 mm | 12.50" | 2560x1440 |
案例
金属底盘是LeBook的一个亮点，因为它感觉接近于价格较高的Surface Pro的质量。然而，背面的金属支架本可以更坚硬或更厚，因为它有点容易变形。
底部由Alcantara和仿皮的底部纹理组成。虽然它看起来很好，有高质量的感觉，但它太灵活了，容易扭曲，对打字体验有负面影响。如果有一个更牢固的、更坚实的键盘甲板会更好。
尺寸和重量都比Surface Pro 7略大和略重，这与稍大的12.6英寸显示屏有关。不管怎么说，KUU的屏占比是比较高的。使用键盘底座使平板电脑的重量增加了约308克。
连接性
两个USB-C端口分别支持充电和外部显示器。不幸的是，与Surface Pro系列不同，没有集成的USB-A端口。
沟通
没有Wi-Fi 6支持可能是为了节省成本。集成的1x1英特尔3168提供的实际传输速率只有350Mbps左右，比配备英特尔AX200或AX201的昂贵笔记本电脑慢4倍以上。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (302-360)
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø271 (239-312)
网络摄像头
13.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括交流适配器、可拆卸的键盘底座和一支主动式手写笔。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备
键盘
打字体验比Surface Pro系列差，主要是因为一个缺点：底座不能完全平放在桌子上。因此，键盘底座的背面在打字时总是上下跳动，影响了键盘按键的反馈。打字时感觉很有弹性，因为你每按一次键都要把整个底座压下去。
键盘底座的左手掌托上有两个LED指示灯。这些灯比较亮，我们希望它们能再小一点，以减少视觉上的干扰。
触摸板
点击板比Surface Pro 7的点击板大（10.8 x 6.4厘米对10.2 x 5.3厘米）。然而，它的优势到此为止，因为LeBook点击板的其他方面几乎都很糟糕。它的表面在以较慢的速度滑行时很粘，导致光标跳动。多点触摸输入也很不稳定，反应迟钝，而且经常不准确。例如，当试图拖放时，系统会经常将我们的动作登记为放大或缩小。集成的点击板按钮虽然响亮，但需要很大的力量才能真正按下。最后，点击板不支持Precision ，这意味着任何微软Precision 的功能都是不可能的。
显示
12.6英寸的京东方TV126WTM-NU0 IPS面板是第一个出现在我们数据库中的。某些属性，如 响应时间和色彩覆盖率比Surface Pro略差，幸好在网络浏览时不会有太大影响。其他属性，如对比度和最大亮度是微不足道的，是预算面板的代表。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE TV126WTM-NU0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 269.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 256.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.33 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 269.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 586:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.72 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6910 K
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U BOE TV126WTM-NU0, IPS, 12.6", 2160x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 N123NCA-GS1, a-Si IPS LED, 12.3", 1920x1280 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus LG Philips LP123WQ332684, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Sharp LQ123N1, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, 12.4", 1536x1024 | NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Sharp SHP142C, IPS, 12.5", 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 4% | 4% | 0% | 12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 68.8 | 67 -3% | 66.9 -3% | 67.9 -1% | 64.4 -6% | 74.8 9% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 89.1 | 99.2 11% | 96.7 9% | 96.8 9% | 94.6 6% | 98.9 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 65.3 | 68.8 5% | 69.1 6% | 68.8 5% | 65.7 1% | 75.6 16% |
| Response Times | -29% | -11% | 42% | 15% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 42 ? | 63.2 ? -50% | 50.8 ? -21% | 29 ? 31% | 34.8 ? 17% | 37.6 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 33.2 ? | 36 ? -8% | 33.6 ? -1% | 16 ? 52% | 29.2 ? 12% | 31.6 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 199.2 ? | 1250 ? | 21930 ? | 198.4 ? | ||
| Screen | 70% | 45% | 38% | 44% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 269.7 | 419 55% | 408 51% | 380 41% | 354.3 31% | 431.5 60% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 256 | 406 59% | 425 66% | 378 48% | 353 38% | 406 59% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 94 8% | 85 -2% | 86 -1% | 95 9% | 80 -8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.46 | 0.23 50% | 0.34 26% | 0.31 33% | 0.29 37% | 0.43 7% |
| Contrast (:1) | 586 | 1822 211% | 1200 105% | 1226 109% | 1222 109% | 1003 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.72 | 1.1 70% | 1.5 60% | 2.28 39% | 1.41 62% | 3.56 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.49 | 2.2 79% | 2.5 76% | 3.93 63% | 2.96 72% | 7 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.27 | 0.5 61% | 1.4 -10% | 0.97 24% | 1.44 -13% | 3.34 -163% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.5 35% | 1.6 30% | 2.56 -11% | 1.2 48% | 2.9 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.06 107% | 2.05 107% | 2.32 95% | 2.26 97% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6910 94% | 6524 100% | 6432 101% | 6130 106% | 6600 98% | 6572 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 62.8 | 63.7 | 63 | 60.2 | 66.7 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 99.2 | 96.8 | 97 | 94.4 | 98.9 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
42% | 13% /
28% | 28% /
32% | 20% /
30% | 8% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间很宽，约为sRGB的89%，而价格较高的超极本和平板电脑的色彩空间则超过95%。色彩再现大致与Surface Laptop Go的显示屏相当。 笔记本电脑.
尽管起步价很便宜，但显示屏开箱后的校准效果还不错。色温略微过冷，但校准后就能解决这个问题，没有任何问题。最终的平均灰度和ColorChecker deltaE值分别只有1.5和1.27，比我们最初的预期要好。然而，品红色的阴影可能比其他颜色更不准确。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
户外能见度比大多数其他平板电脑要差，因为显示屏比较暗。在大多数户外条件下，预计会有很多不可避免的眩光。
业绩
处理器
CPU的性能大约比最新的30％和45％慢 酷睿i7-1165G7 在单线程和多线程工作负载中分别慢30%和45%。虽然很重要，但对于网络浏览或文字处理等较简单的任务来说，这种差异并不十分明显。当然，它仍然比赛扬或Atom系统好，在那里应用程序需要更长的时间来启动或浏览。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø450 (423.97-477.55)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø547 (525.27-680.19)
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø446 (440.95-506.36)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel Core i7-8550U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø454 (446.34-529.84)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (1118 - 1138, n=2) | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (383 - 394, n=2) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (841 - 937, n=4) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (3.77 - 4.43, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark的结果是我们所期望的，相对于具有相同Core i7-8550U CPU的其他型号。我们很欣赏这个事实，即该系统没有制造商的臃肿软件，可以获得干净的Windows 10体验。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2629 - 4072, n=31) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6628 - 9291, n=29) | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4889 - 7006, n=29) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1506 - 3160, n=29) | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3645 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时，没有重大延迟问题。尽管采用了过时的英特尔CPU，但在60FPS下播放4K视频也没有任何问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
内部存储的空间为512GB，传输率与大多数SATA III SSD相似。缺少SD卡读卡器意味着当内部驱动器像大多数笔记本电脑驱动器一样大时，这就不是一个问题了。
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U KUU-512GB | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus SanDisk DF4064 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 121% | 171% | 268% | 85% | -127% | |
| Seq Read (MB/s) | 503 | 1760 250% | 1725 243% | 2185 334% | 1347 168% | 154 -69% |
| Seq Write (MB/s) | 421.1 | 761 81% | 931 121% | 1731 311% | 491 17% | 102.4 -76% |
| 4K Read (MB/s) | 19.23 | 47.68 148% | 50.1 161% | 46.28 141% | 38.08 98% | 5.07 -74% |
| 4K Write (MB/s) | 78.1 | 176 125% | 136.9 75% | 161.6 107% | 98.2 26% | 8.42 -89% |
| 4K-64 Read (MB/s) | 133.6 | 581 335% | 870 551% | 1021 664% | 483.1 262% | 27.74 -79% |
| 4K-64 Write (MB/s) | 222.3 | 118.5 -47% | 762 243% | 1125 406% | 350.9 58% | 12.15 -95% |
| Access Time Read * (ms) | 0.091 | 0.155 -70% | 0.279 -207% | 0.069 24% | 0.057 37% | 0.747 -721% |
| Access Time Write * (ms) | 0.558 | 0.188 66% | 0.028 95% | 0.046 92% | 0.105 81% | 1.136 -104% |
| Score Read (Points) | 203 | 805 297% | 1093 438% | 1286 533% | 656 223% | 48 -76% |
| Score Write (Points) | 342 | 371 8% | 992 190% | 1460 327% | 498 46% | 31 -91% |
| Score Total (Points) | 653 | 1551 138% | 2616 301% | 3389 419% | 1458 123% | 103 -84% |
| Copy ISO MB/s (MB/s) | 433.4 | 1174 171% | 1555 259% | 765 77% | 119.7 -72% | |
| Copy Program MB/s (MB/s) | 365.8 | 262.8 -28% | 468.5 28% | 299.6 -18% | 72.8 -80% | |
| Copy Game MB/s (MB/s) | 409.2 | 562 37% | 841 106% | 371.5 -9% | 116.5 -72% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 98% | 156% | 211% | 93% | -77% | |
| Write 4K (MB/s) | 85.8 | 72.8 -15% | 165.3 93% | 182.7 113% | 87.6 2% | 7.837 -91% |
| Read 4K (MB/s) | 19.22 | 26.35 37% | 42.95 123% | 51.4 167% | 40.41 110% | 7.689 -60% |
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 412.7 | 823 99% | 955 131% | 1303 216% | 601 46% | 104.9 -75% |
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 518 | 1169 126% | 867 67% | 1450 180% | 1033 99% | 167.8 -68% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 201 | 112.6 -44% | 423.5 111% | 342.9 71% | 269.1 34% | 13.64 -93% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s) | 125.6 | 327.2 161% | 479.2 282% | 523 316% | 261.4 108% | 32.95 -74% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 451.1 | 1039 130% | 1060 135% | 1776 294% | 818 81% | 99.5 -78% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s) | 556 | 2176 291% | 2251 305% | 2378 328% | 2025 264% | 128.8 -77% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 110% /
111% | 164% /
165% | 240% /
247% | 89% /
88% | -102% /
-109% |
* ... smaller is better
KUU-512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
556 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
451.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
125.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
201 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
518 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
412.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
19.22 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
85.8 MB/s
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
GPU性能
的。 UHD Graphics 620以今天的标准来看是很差的，因为 Radeon RX Vega和 Iris Xe型号是最高的。对于4K流媒体或非游戏玩家来说，这不会是一个问题，但即使是最轻微的编辑或游戏，也会从升级到Surface平板电脑或任何其他配备AMD Zen或11英特尔Tiger Lake CPU的设备中大大受益。
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Teclast F7 Air | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1913 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8139 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1046 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 427 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 75.3 | 40.9 | 17.9 | 16 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 11.7 | 5.39 | 5.39 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 11.3 | 9.73 | 9.11 |
Emissions
系统噪音
内部风扇很吵，而且经常跳动。即使是简单的动作，如浏览网页，也会启动风扇，而在大多数其他平板电脑和超低电压笔记本电脑上，它将保持沉默。预计在大多数情况下，风扇的脉动在36至41dB(A)范围内，或者在运行游戏等高负荷时高达45dB(A)。
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 14% | 4% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.8 | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% | 26.4 -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.8 | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% | 26.4 -11% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.8 | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% | 26.4 -11% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 41.1 | 26 37% | 25 39% | 26.4 36% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 44.5 | 34.6 22% | 28.7 36% | 36.9 17% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 45 | 37 18% | 34.5 23% | 44.2 2% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 34.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 41.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44.5 / 45 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
温度
在桌面上空转时，表面温度比预期的要高，正面和背面的热点分别高达41℃和36℃。运行更高的负载会启动内部风扇，导致前面的热点温度略低，为37摄氏度，而后面的热点温度略高，为40摄氏度。在处理平板电脑时，温度很明显，但幸好边缘和角落的温度较低，不会让人分心。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
压力测试
当运行Prime95时，CPU会在大约30秒内提升到2.4GHz，直到达到77℃的核心温度。此后，时钟频率会下降，在1GHz和1.7GHz之间循环，以保持60℃至65℃的冷却温度。因此，Turbo Boost的可持续性在LeBook上是有限的，因为它毕竟是一个平板电脑。
用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上运行3DMark 11，物理学和图形学得分分别为6186和1689分，而在主电源上则为5384和1743分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 41 |
| Prime95压力 | 1.0 - 1.7 | -- | 60 - 65 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 600 | 400 | 58 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
在运行类似的应用程序时，该系统的耗电量比Surface Pro 7 Plus略低。然而，与微软平板电脑能够提供的比LeBook更高的性能相比，仅仅几瓦的节省显得微不足道。
当同时运行Prime95和FurMark时，我们能够从小型（约6.3 x 6.3 x 3厘米）的45瓦交流适配器中测量到38.9瓦的临时最大功耗，然后热限制就开始了。前面提到的Surface Pro 7 Plus由于其较新的处理器具有较高的Turbo Boost潜力，其耗电量可以显著增加到62.5瓦。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.8 / 1.05 Watt |
| Idle | 6.4 / 8.8 / 8.9 Watt |
| Load |
33.6 / 38.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, KUU-512GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.4" | NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4064, IPS, 2560x1440, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -18% | 19% | 9% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.4 | 4 37% | 5.5 14% | 3.2 50% | 2.8 56% | 4.7 27% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.8 | 5.9 33% | 9.1 -3% | 5.3 40% | 6.8 23% | 7 20% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.9 | 8.3 7% | 10.8 -21% | 8.4 6% | 8 10% | 8 10% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 33.6 | 30.1 10% | 39.2 -17% | 27 20% | 37.2 -11% | 14.1 58% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 38.9 | 59 -52% | 62.5 -61% | 46.9 -21% | 51.6 -33% | 27.1 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 30.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Prime95 Stress Test
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U: Ø27.9 (22.7-39)
电池寿命
电池容量介于Surface Pro 7和Latitude 12 7210 2合1之间。然而，无线局域网的运行时间在KUU模型上大约短了两个小时，总共将近6.5小时。
从空电到满电大约需要两个整小时。
| Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 48.9 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 39 Wh | NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 31.9 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 28% | 27% | 28% | 25% | 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 6.4 | 8.2 28% | 8.1 27% | 8.2 28% | 8 25% | 6.8 6% |
| Load (h) | 2 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 2 | 3.6 | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 13.6 | 22.8 | 35 | 11.3 |
Pros
+ 包括可拆卸的键盘底座和活动笔
+ 2个带DP和PD的USB-C端口
+ 有吸引力的金属底盘设计
+ 大尺寸点击板
Cons
- 打字时键盘底座弯曲太大
- 风扇频繁而响亮地跳动
- 图形性能缓慢
- 显示器可以更亮
- 键盘精度差
结论 - 预算内较好的Windows平板电脑之一
KUU LeBook的优势是视觉上的和有形的。它是一款坚固的平板电脑，可以作为价格较高的旗舰机型，如Surface Pro或HP ElitePad。我们还必须赞扬制造商坚持使用酷睿U系列CPU，而不是像Surface Go或其他许多预算范围内的廉价Windows平板电脑那样采用更弱的Atom、Celeron或Pentium部分。宽敞的12.6英寸触摸屏和相对较窄的边框有助于使LeBook更有吸引力。
它看起来和感觉上都像是一款高质量的平板电脑，其酷睿U系列CPU的性能令人尊敬。然而，弹跳的键盘底座和高亢的风扇噪音很难被忽视。
KUU的好处大多是皮毛，因为脉动的高音调风扇、较暗的显示屏、较短的电池和海绵状的键盘按键都阻碍了用户体验，尽管机箱可能是多么光滑和顺畅。虽然LeBook在这些特定领域无法与Surface Pro相比，但它总体上仍比其他预算的Windows平板电脑好，包括华硕变形金刚书或 笔记本特别是在显示屏尺寸和性能方面。
价格和可用性
LeBook 12.6尚未广泛上市，在发布时也没有确切的上市日期。
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U
- 09/04/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
