Huawei P smart
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 46 scores (from 61 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P smart
How exactly is the Huawei P Smart smart? Why did we not think of that? Choosing 'smart' as a name for a smartphone is just as in-your-face as naming a soccer team 'the team'. And it inadvertently raises the question: what exactly does 'smart' really mean?
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: What Mobile
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart is a fantastic budget smartphone. There is very little missing in the relatively small package when compared to a flagship and quite frankly the price is way too low.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThis new phone from the company that are making Samsung and Apple look over their shoulders does not have the eye watering price of some of the recent offerings in fact this is available on PAYG 1 from Vodafone for only £229.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSure, it may fall into the “mid-range” or even “budget” pricing structure, but we really shouldn’t equate that with a lesser handset any more, because this isn’t a lesser handset. It certainly shows that, for not that-much-money, you can buy a phone which is only a small really small down from the leading-edge phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 100% features: 84% workmanship: 94%
Source: Zdnet.com
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionReviewing the Honor 9 Lite, I said it set the new high bar for the £200 price point. That makes it a tough handset to beat, and the Huawei P Smart doesn't quite manage it: Huawei's budget brand definitely takes the plaudits in this particular head-to-head.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith a decent 18:9 screen, the P Smart is a fine Android phone that should appeal to anyone looking for a cheap contract phone. However, the fact it’s so similar to the Honor 9 Lite (which costs £30 less when bought SIM-free) makes it hard to recommend, especially as the Honor has a couple of extra features – dual SIM and a second front camera – which the Huawei lacks.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionJust a month ago, we thought Huawei has hit the sweet spot with the Honor 7X, with pretty much unmatched value for money on a global scale, not confined to Southeast Asia. But the leading Chinese maker has outdone itself with the P Smart. Thoughtful trimming in the right places made it possible to keep the package up to par and drive the price down a little more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionCompared to flagship phones, the Huawei P Smart leaves some things to be desired. Improvements are needed in the battery life and performance department to make it an easy recommendation. However, stood against other £200-£250 phones and it holds its own pretty well thanks to a nice display, subtle design and modern appearance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you’re in the market for a reliable smartphone that won’t break the bank, the Huawei P Smart is the perfect handset for you. It’s durable, fast and reliable. I mean, what more could you want from a £230 smartphone? But if you’re looking for something a little bit cheaper, the one-year-old Huawei P8 Lite is a fantastic alternative, priced at a measly £129.95 on Amazon. You can’t go wrong with either. There’s also the Moto G5. A fantastic budget smartphone that’s bound to impress.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 86% features: 82% display: 90% mobility: 73%
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2018
Source: PC Welt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 92% features: 92% display: 97% mobility: 99%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 74%
Source: n-tv
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/17/2018
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zona Movilidad
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/17/2018
Source: Putoinformatico
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2018
Source: Hipertextual
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Movil Zona
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Geek
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: Esperienza Mobile
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/16/2018
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2018
Source: Everyeye.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 72% mobility: 79% workmanship: 78%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 82% features: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 86%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: All About Phones
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: CNet France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Fredzone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2018
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Input
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 72%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 659: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.