Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 23 scores (from 44 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Source: Know Your Mobile
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionReally quite an impressive low-cost smartphone with a lot of bang for your buck. Arguably one of the best budget handsets on the market thanks to Samsung's mastery of Super AMOLED display technology and some sterling battery performance, both of which put it ahead of rivals such as the Moto G, while in other areas it's quite comparable with that very capable handset. The trade-off, however, is that the Moto G does get stock Android and timely updates, while Samsung's Galaxy J5 has TouchWiz on-top and requires a bit of extra fettling between software versions.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionBest in class of the budget Android category; you will struggle to find battery and display performance this good anywhere else at this price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith better performance and a longer battery life, Samsung’s updated Galaxy J5 is a low-cost marvel android 7.0 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung Galaxy J5 (2017) brings many improvements compared to its successful predecessor and this makes it more than accomplished model. First of all, the device comes with an entirely metal design which is not always seen in this price range. There is a fingerprint sensor built in the hardware Home button. It is quite surprising that we don’t find a USB Type-C port but this is a drawback which can be ignored.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung's alphabet soup is making less and less sense. Here we have the Galaxy J5 (2017) that's got a premium metal build, a frugal 14nm chipset, an excellent Super AMOLED display, and Samsung's latest software. How is that lower midrange?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Phone World
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSamsung Galaxy J5 Pro has 4G supported device with some mid-range features. The device is especially for Samsung lovers because other device lovers will have some issue with its price which is a little bit expensive compared to other smartphones.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIt has one of the best interfaces around: sleek and modern-looking, it has Samsung’s excellent apps, and it has a very solid battery life. But its camera and, most importantly, performance are underwhelming. The phone often feels stuttery and the camera lacks in detail and speed. And we know the terrible state of Android updates for phones like the J5 (2017). In such a fiercely competitive market, the J5 (2017) does too little to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 92%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Blick
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Media Trends
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2017
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2017
Rating: price: 80% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2017
Source: PC Guia
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Geek
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: 4G News
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 60% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 69% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 85%
Source: All About Phones
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: CNet France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Antyweb
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2017
Source: Yamobi
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: CZC
CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7870 Octa:
Exynos 7集成八个主频高达1.6 GHz的Cortex-A53核心,采用14纳米工艺制造。它同时集成ARM Mali T830-MP2显卡和双通道内存控制器(LPDDR3-1866)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.